#history
1 messages · Page 100 of 1
rip
also no it was out like a decade early at best
Good old 70’s
one of the biggest gun launcher issues was literally just putting the missile in a metal tube to not foul the barrel
which they had working on fucking t-55s
goompy
admittedly it's overall a good thing it failed
even if you got everything working the mbt-70 spaced armor became obsolescent very very fast
it would age like milk in the sun
splendid
Imagine if
M1 Abrams insisted on 152mm launcher
“The Justice in 1909. Detail of a 194mm turret. The shape of the boat crane in the background is characteristic for the ship.”
As something to carry on from Mbt 70

Mind if I post IJN Fuso?
nah
wouldnt be as enormous a disaster as the armor situation really
swapping the gun to a smaller sane one is easier than unfucking the entire protection scheme
IJN Fuso
Do correct me if I type something wrong here
First composite armor: American T95
First mass produced composite armor: T-64
First APFDS: T-62's 3VBM-1
First APS: Soviet Drozd
First MBT smoothbore: T-62's 115mm
for tanks or?
as opposed to the APGSDS on ships
first APFSDS
and the composite armor on planes
nevermind
QLZ-04 best anti infantry weapon
Your tank (weak) vs my gun (strong)
Headshot the mf on top
Rifled is good for HE and HESH
Smooth is good for HEATFS and APFDS
Si i know
Actually HE loses some energy from rotation in rifled shells
Richie is gonna shove krem into a sabot
But it's spinning so spreads around more when it hits

For HESH yes
Riche does it?
Yes

For HE it will waste energy by spreading the blast more
is it true that APFSDS preforms worse when fired from a same cailber arty gun\
Less energy in places you want to be damaged
but good for anti infantry

No cause energy will still be wasted more

Rifled guns have the advantage of firing full caliber shells
So that they carry more mass
But in terms of efficiency a smoothbore wins
si
HESH and HE thrive from the volume of explosive so they are better in rifles guns
Riche
But HE loses a very small amount of effectiveness from rotational effects
is it possible to dive bomb a HE or HESH shell from a plaen and break the roof
and HESH is going to do uh
nightmarish things to any tank roof in the world
or ever to likely be put in service
Wish I can Hug Soyuz like how Hesh sticks to flat concrete
Krem
real
bless
WG done her refit cool
Massive [CENSORED]
god i hope VB gets the funny quad 37mm
The zenithaux?
Ye
The quad bofors french cousin
With hyper rof
1200 rpm
Imagine that on a tank chassis
I am erect
Remember when there was an option to upgrade your Humvee with 4 Kornets
thats rad
Some countries use it
also i dont think im familiar with this one actually, do tell
im thinking of ganguts armored 37mm
MG turret Humvee better
oh jesus christ is that a quad ACAD
Ye
I expected to see her before twin 57mm in AL
is it true that german u-boats in ww2 were horribly constructed?
Yes honey
Who said it
the later u-boats got pretty dicey
It depends on time ye
i wonder if i could get the devs to put that quad in too

though god i dont want to pick between the two
they're both such cool mounts
what the fuck is this
Warship girls r?
Yeah WGR
tf is WGR
“Based”
Twin 533 is UR
Quad 37 is SSR
Pla just read
Tf
boat game between KC and AL

for having it at all i mean
Im richie
baaased
me in vb be like
Soviet 500mm gunne
Quad 37 acad
How long would it take me to Navalize
Some years

soon™️
Yeah I will use you as Ammo
Is ok
you can use deez nuts as ammo
Ok PLA
what
so true
You know it choomfy
Sheridan saw pretty heavy use
niihau incident is some hollywood shit
and this incident basically influenced all of the japanese internment policy in the US because three japanese americans immediately defected to the japanese side during this
What is that?
japanese pilot from Pearl Harbor crashes on an island in niihau
PVA troops at the battle for Triangle hill
Battle for what!?


what do i say
The IJA earned a rather amusing nickname for themselves thanks to their relentless plunder of wood, often from houses (they dismantled the houses while people were inside).
皇軍
Huángjūn
Imperial Army
蝗軍
Huángjūn
Locust Army
I though that nickname came from something else
What is the earlier convo?
thirsty

Abrams looking thingy
Not really history related but i thought it better here than in al-general at least:
So i understand CVs have been the dominant naval unit since ww2, however it's occured to me that they haven't been the ONLY ship to see more focus and development over the years...
I'm led to think Destroyers then are the main Frontline naval ships... But it's so jarring to think about that when my concept of an average DD is "light armor-goes fast- lots TRP and tiny main guns"
then it should drink
But it's not even using it's built in STRAW XD
Real talk, the engine in most tanks is in the rear right?
there's only a few with the engine in front
most developmental
while a couple like the Merkava have it in the front
They must have some BEEFY armor if they designed it like that
engine doesn't really provide much
tanks like the Merkava have to sacrifice a great amount of armor protection for a frontally mounted engine
main trade off is the ability to replenish ammo while hull down
Hull down?
during the Yom Kippur war Israeli tanks were running out of ammo and being unable to replenish ammo mid combat
Tho in my eyes such tanks would only be viable in hilly terrain and probably best for sniping
Merkava's rear door allows it to replenish ammo while still being mid down
Yea, not quite. Destroyers have been on thr naval forefront for almost any role since WW2.
"bonjour"
Not quite what? As in DDs are used more than cvs?
hilarious facebook meme from a totally not biased person
they're the most likely to decide a engagement, its not like your gonna be having more CVs than destroyers
man's just jealous of tanks with actual reverse speeds
I wouldn't really call
WW2 era frigates proper surface combatants beyond ASW and convoy escort duty
But what about them as they are today?
Has their role changed since then?
massively
I'm legit curious about this i wann aleeeearn
considering we have everything from the dumpster fire Baden's that somehow weigh up to 7.2k tons https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baden-Württemberg-class_frigate
to the actually good air defense frigates such as the FREMMs https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FREMM_multipurpose_frigate
The FREMM (French: Frégate Européenne Multi-Mission; Italian: Fregata Europea Multi-Missione), which stands for "European multi-purpose frigate", is a Franco-Italian family of multi-purpose frigates designed by Naval Group and Fincantieri. In France, this surface combatant is known as the "Aquitaine class" (17 units planned, of which 9 were late...
Hot damn the FREMM looks seggsy
The Constellation class is a class of multi-mission guided-missile frigates under development for the United States Navy as a follow-on to the modular but problematic littoral combat ship. The U.S. Navy announced the FFG(X) frigate project in the United States Department of Defense Request For Information (RFI) on 10 July 2017.The U.S. Navy sele...
most navies these days operate primarily guided missile frigates
But wait, how does a modern frigates role differ from modern DD role?
for most navies they cover the same role
in terms of navies like the USN
Frigates primarily function as escorts
they're able to provide both ASW and anti aircraft capabilities to the fleet
with ships like the OHPs having a rather long service history with a reputation for being able to take a beating
The Oliver Hazard Perry class is a class of guided-missile frigates named after U.S. Commodore Oliver Hazard Perry, the hero of the naval Battle of Lake Erie. Also known as the Perry or FFG-7 (commonly "fig seven") class, the warships were designed in the United States in the mid-1970s as general-purpose escort vessels inexpensive enough to be b...
Well I've seen the "frigates are just damage sponges" so that checks out
"He look at that frigate! He's doing his job" says as said frigate is on fire and dying
Wait... So frigates sound just like what we think of as heavy/light cruisers?
its hard to really put them into traditional classifications
i wouldnt really say that most they cover the same role in most navies
in the USN they serve primarily as escorts tho are intended to operate in conjunction with larger vessels
in most of the big navies the frigates will be mostly ASW
in the japanese navy the "frigates", aka the non-aegis "destroyers" are ASW vessels
with some self defence
Sorry, something came up. What I wanted to say was that DD development is also equally emphasised upon nowadays, as are CVs.
I'd imagine Japan's navy is going to be set up a smidge different from everyone else considering they have to think in terms of defending ONLY
Mostly since their displacement bloated massively.
Well... Kinda
doesn't really help that Japan classifies most of their frigate sized vessels as destroyers https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asahi-class_destroyer
The Asahi class of destroyers of the Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force is optimized for undersea warfare. The class was initially designated "25DD", referring to a date on the Japanese calendar, specifically the 25th fiscal year of the Heisei period (2013).
The lead ship, Asahi, is the third ship to hold the name after the Asahi-class destroyer ...
not exactly
they dont
not officially
An Arleigh Burke now weighs what? 10k tons?
yes
idk how many times i posted this
but
いずも型護衛艦, Izumo-gata Goeikan, the STOVL carriers
ひゅうが型護衛艦, Hyūga-gata Goeikan , the helicopter carriers
まや型護衛艦, Maya-gata Goeikan, the guided missile destroyers
あさひ型護衛艦, Asahi-gata Goeikan, the escort destroyers
もがみ型護衛艦, Mogami-gata Goeikan, the new frigates
あぶくま型護衛艦 Abukuma-gata Goeikan, the older destroyer escortsdifferent from what they used in ww2 for the destroyers
秋月型駆逐艦, Akizuki-gata Kuchikukan, for example
Miles away from the 2,500 tonners we had back in WW2.
ah
And yea, I was about to say Frigates are now back on the centre stage, a bit closer to the "DD" we had back in WW2.
Arleigh Burke's are still in service??? Aren't they all old AF?
Flight 3As are just recently laid down and launched, I believe .
Flight Is are old, yes.
tho Burke herself is about 32 years old
USS Arleigh Burke (DDG-51), named for Admiral Arleigh A. Burke, USN (1901–1996), is the lead ship of the Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyers. She was laid down by the Bath Iron Works company at Bath, Maine, on 6 December 1988; launched on 16 September 1989; and commissioned on 4 July 1991.
Arleigh Burke's designers incorporated many le...
USN has trouble building anything actually new due to the usual congress meddling
ah
Jesus i remember reading about the Burke's when i was still in elementary. And they're still building more? Reminds me of how the US milked the ESSEX Cvs
If the design is great, there is no need to change it.
True
there reaching the end of their growth room
I don't remember who said it, there were a couple designs based on a Brooklyn hull quite recently.
But u can always improve as tech improves
there's.. a fair bit of reason to change it
but it should be able to hold over the USN until DDG(X)s start showing up
And eventually, were going to be stuck with a shit ton of outdated ships
Sure, a new platform is needed at this stage, but of course time is needed to develop it
blame Congress' obsession with the ten carrier fleet basically
It's not entirely the same, but basically, think the Sherman
And it's 999 variants
Is it obsolete now? Yes. Was it highly modified and constantly modified? Also yes.
I actually like the Burkes design overall, i just always imagined we'd move on as tech in recent years has exploded in progress
its long lifespan came from foreign users
even then it was obsolete even with the M51s
yeah
I was going through my Grandpa's stuff and found these. US Navy binoculars from WW2
in terms of Burke
as soon as the Pershing's were rolling that was the death knell for US Sherman development
her designs still more than relevant
Fair enough, was thinking more about the overall lifespan, not just US use.
issue is just her replacement taking forever
Pershing took quite some time if I recall.
Do u think the USN will give any Burke's to museums?
He wasn't even old enough to serve in WW2 but served post-war in the British Army and later the merchant marine. Not sure where he got them from but he loved the sea
And even then, had a couple issues until M46 hammered it out.
you dont mean the CGX on the wooster hull right?
I think that's it.
the m46s were still kind of shit but that's another topic
They look cool. Can we agree on that?
With SPY-6 being integrated on Flight III and backfitted to Flight IIA they have a good deal of life left in them.
That Skirt and Torsion is seggs
But M48...eeeeh
i love Egg Lord
T-55, also great
alright, valid
Just not so sure on M48 with that muzzle brake
What's funny is the OHP replacement is as big as a Burke and the Burke replacement is the size of a Ticonderoga
The Burke's to me: "ship wants to die but can't because he's too cool"
its because the navy has no budget to replace it
OHP replacement you mean the constellation?
Are we going to get a Tico replacement the size of a heavy cruiser??? 🤔

Yeah
the strict adherence to the ten carrier fleet and sloppy project spending basically hamstrings them
congress wont let them scale back to 8 or 9 carriers and their programs they do run turn into shitshows
Honestly, DDs now are already kinda cruisers
10k tons, treaty compliant /s
like lets not get it twisted
Woah woah woah, are you saying budget cuts... good?
its no veneration for the arleigh burke or anything
the navy wants to be done with them a decade ago
they just cant
Disgraceful kill him to death from shooting him in the crotch 2000 times with a paintball gun
US naval budget cuts and hamstringing resulted in the Standard BBs, therefore budget cuts good
it also forces them to cornet cut all over the place
Also yeah the Fords have spare space for when they put lasers and shit on them where Burkes are out of space
like the first batches of virginias being made out of shitty cheapo titanium
or the virginias kind of existing period as much as i like them
or the fact they cant invest in any infrastructure and US shipbuilding is basically being smothered in the crib
sometimes I just wonder
how the fuck the navy keeps putting itself into this position of being fucked over by congress then wasting their little spare funding on stupid procurement and budget choices
like god forbid a war starts and newport news gets flattened
the usn just kind of
fucking
dies
such as wasting their entire aviation development budget on the A-12 for the entirety of the 90s
or the LCS program that they have to keep alive so the shipyards don't die
so there ending up with a bunch of hulls
they don't have the numbers to crew
at this point im kind of of the opinion they should just
If war breaks out, i imagine the US will go into overdrive
To get to your original question the roles they fill differ between navies.
To the U.S. a CV is their primary offensive weapon. It’s why most U.S. surface combatants have few ASMs (though their SAMs can pull double duty).
The destroyer and cruiser are meant primarily as escorts to the CV. Cold War doctrine was one nuclear CG per CV (a practice that can actually date back to aspirations of assigning one Atlanta or Juneau per CV in WWII)
With the proliferation of Aegis among the fleet destroyers (and for a time the Tico was considered a destroyer) became the primary defensive assets.
Frigates were viewed as escort and ASW vessels while DDGs and CGs were for air warfare.
They operate as a system, each covering different roles to differ capacities.
give the entirety of the army's budget to infrastructure building
Wars where that might be an issue would be too short for it to really matter.
they're doing nothing of actual value with it while the actual important service branch is committing die of old age
I'm expecting them to just dump it all into one fucking program that fails or produces a medicore platform
they dont have the budget they require and when they get their budget they spend it like they just got done slamming down a gallon of glue
navy lucked out with the Burke since that program worked out and gave them a world class destroyer that everyone copied
i mean the virginias are great
they've just also fucked up so bad there's one place on earth to properly service and build them now
Under budget and ahead of schedule
see above
I mean submarine procurement has its time to time issues but it usually goes down fine
the platform itself is fantastic
the procurement and the infrastructure is depressing and awful
🤨 generally the LCS program had potential and they smothered it and keep procuring more of the damn things despite it already being a dead horse
and now its gone so badly i think i could convince the usn to give me one for $200
They should’ve picked one design, taken the STANFLEX concept and done that.
there's also the matter of the US doing the smart thing and buying FREMMS
except they need to complicate it by making them shittier
should of just double downed with the Independence and made a flex hull version with actual VLS cells to make them useful post module cuts
I mean they fucked themselves over
by choosing the shipyard in Wisconsin
I think there’s room to fit in the bow but weight issues mean it was never utilized.
Probably a single Mk-41 unit.
If your implying nukes, i don't think they have any place in a discussion about conventional warfare...
If someone throws nukes, were all dead, end of discussion.
either gut the army budget or slash two carriers and put all those funds directly to infrastructure
and literally nothing else before thats done and dusted
🤨 generally we could of had one of the best anti submarine and anti mine platforms and now its been left to rot
in terms of just navy infrastructure issues
its hard to say since I don't really think gutting the army is the best idea
Well yes but no. I’m talking about the pace of an extreme intensity conflict.
Even if conventional you have to consider the political aspect, which nukes are a part of.
Hypothetical “Long wars” with the Soviet Union were measured in a couple months.
With how long it takes to build ships you could maybe get a couple out of mothball within a massive conflict.
also the us can't go into "overdrive" period
like
the infrastructure literally doesnt exist
they can't do the ww2 thing even if a protracted war started
its a matter of rebuilding infrastructure that decayed or starting anew
This tool allows the user to see the effects on the Department of Defense’s total operation and support costs and on the size of the military of adding or subtracting tanks, ships, aircraft, and other units.
Compared to WWII the production facilities have become incredibly specialized.
You can’t build a SPY-6 radar anywhere.
Oof
a lot of yards died post cold war
They’d go nuclear.
that's not the point
It’s escalation dominance.
It’s how extreme intensity wars are likely to be fought.
tho
How are we somehow spending all the moneys on our military but at the same time not spending money on military infrastructure?
dumb choices and the revolving door nature of our government
when you actually adjust for spending as ratio to GDP
its comparable to most other nations
we spend the most because we have the biggest economy on earth
WOW SO IVED BEEN LIED TO XD
Also personnel are very expensive, especially with U.S. rates.
the US is still near the top in % GDP spent
Doesn't help that inflation is absolutely tanking the value of the dollar
Dollar’s doing better than a lot of other currencies.
on top of that you have to factor in due to the Federal nature of the United States a lot of spending is offloaded onto the states that would be central government spending in other nations
a strong dollar is not a good thing for how the US economy works fwiw
what did i miss
What didn’t you miss?
talking about the decrepit hulk of the arleigh burkes and why the usn has no infrastructure
Anyways, I'll be back in like... 45-ish minutes?
anyway blame reagan and bush
3.2%
I do that already.
iowa is just the tip of the ice berg
The more you learn about american history
reagan basically fisted the entire world economy
the more you can connect literally anything wrong in modern society to reagan
the consequences of electing a californian to the white house
my blame range goes all the way from Nixon, skips Carter goes to Reagan to Bush to Clinton then to george bush again
😔
you could argue the man did more damage to the world than the entirety of the ussr
which is fucking hilarious
carter is a gigachad honestly
too bad everyone blames him for opec using the testicular torsion beam on the us
I mean Carter was a good man but also a bad president.
(which was a thing since nixon)
I mean
Carter tried to improve the country
then got fucked over by a mixture of international pressures and events out of his control
Fair
honestly on a larger scale a lot of the problems does really boil down to the revolving door government
if it wasn't for the entire oil situation its likely he would of been remembered much better
revolving door has its own trade offs and benefits
especially for the last two decades
eh, i can imagine there are worse possibilities to
holy fucking shit its so bad
8 year terms
main issue is just people don't like to actually look at context or look back at recent history
the problem is the combination of revolving door and
2 week memory spans in the public
if even that
atm US politics largely boils down to "spite"
it's always been that
Reminder that people in the 60s are like
well
yeah
at least they have to pretend to be not open about it these days
It’s not the best system but it has its moments.
the whole reason any civil rights bills were passed was because Johnson had to tie all of the southern senators up in his bathroom and intimidate him with his lil' Johnson
but yeah its kind of hard to keep things running smoothly when every four-eight years a new guy comes in hell bent to kick down the sandcastle of the last guy
eh its something where despite everything happening you can see signs things are slowly getting better
and upends basically every focu
even if it doesn't seem like it
President Johnson did not mess around. He was constantly on the telephone, making dozens of calls every day, and was known for using more than one phone at a time. Apparently he wanted to get some serious talking done, because nowhere was off limits for conversation. Rather than put a conversation on hold, he would have reporters and aides follow him into the bathroom where the dialogue was supposed to continue. Needless to say this often inspired discomfort.
Johnson is reported to have had conversations while exposing his genitals, urinating in the sink, and sitting on the toilet, but as far as the observers could tell, it never caused him any embarrassment. Some presume that his actions stemmed from a desire to show his power and to put others in an awkward position so that he could better control the conversation. Possibly he simply didn’t want to stop talking.
mixed in nicely with extremely subdivided tribalism
The B in LBJ stands for "BIG DICK"
it doesn't help the cold war involved the US deciding that they needed to be the exact opposite of everything soviet
including the uh
"collectivist" part
but yea, us politics has always and will always be turbofucked
the founding fathers kind of
I mean
intended for that to be the case
LBJ gave us High Speed Rail in america
Thank you LBJ
its not really like the anti collectivist part was unique to the cold war era
oh god dont bring up trains
Seeing that only hurts me more.
before we get another spon-maka boxing match
Trains are very based
nationalize the US rail industry
Oh god
It was a peice of shit but it could go like fucking 120kmh

down with UNION PACIFIC!
help
Except the PRR/Penn Central tracks were so shit they couldn't go 120kmh
I want to open more inland waterways as well.
its always been like that but the cold war REALLY hammered it deep into US cultural identity
toot toot
I mean even during the coldwar
Make the entire Columbia River Navigable.
you see, it's kinda ironic
you had some successes with LBJ's great society and other political movements
because there was all that hippy and counterculture movement stuff in the 60s
and then
counter counter culture!
Jesus Christ and his hood this is turning more sour than that expired ration I ate for shits and giggles
yeah sure there were bright spots
BACK THE BLUE
BACK THE BLUE
Were they Chinese MREs?
CONRAIL! CONRAIL!
Nah. Ur mom lul gottem
but overall the USSR existing basically cursed the US into cutting off the nose to spite the face
because fucking commies and DoNt TrEaD oN mE
I mean
Friedrich de Grosse is a figment of your schizophrenia.
its not really like a lot of the conservative reactionary movements during the cold war were unique to the US
Massive 
stupid be stupid, you can't fix it
opposition to the Soviet Union while it was a factor isn't really the sole cause
it became the national identity
Also, this kinda glosses over detente?
like
people in the US were cheering gorby when he came to manhattan
Good Lord where are the 
spoon, this is >20yr ago
Seeing Dr. Seuss anti Nazi Propaganda is weird
since those reactionary movements were a global thing that persisted into the 90s in other countries as well
we're good
spoon this is incredibly obnoxious
Dr Seuss when racism towards African american and antisemitism : 😠
Dr Seuss when racism towards Japanese Americans: 😀
real
Fine I'll just leave
Interesting fact about the US burning japanese cars in detroit
the Chinese also did
Nonsense! I was just about to start talking about conrail again
the US, in an attempt to one-up the competition, proceeded to burn Chinese people!
(they actually beat him to death with a bat)
Japan laughed, sold more cars to both, and then economically collapsed in the 90s
This picture unironically makes me sad
sounds like a 3 stooges plot
RIP
I was actually going to post a lake freighter video but apparently people were already having a battle or whatever.
✊
Speaking about trains
Then they became part of Norfuck Southern and Crash Smash Xplode
Please. I love navigable waterways.
I loved reading about redditors bitching "the media is covering this up! no one in msm is covering this" about east palestine
and the comments are under a post with the link to
the NYT
This is a story of how one ship became two totally different worlds after breaking in half during the Lake Superior storm of 1905. For the 15 crewmen in the front, the Mataafa was a shelter—for the 9 crewmen in the stern, she became a death trap.
BIG shoutout to The Great Lakes Maritime History Project, State of Wisconsin Collection for all of ...
saved
Bless
stole this from undie lol
thats a good one
the stream is tomorrow at 5
what do yall wanna cope about
we know there's something new, and something about "alpha"
"Why is the media not talking about this???"
My brother in christ, how did
you find out about it
The White Hurricane left a trail of death and destruction in its path, claiming the lives of some 250 sailors. To this day, it remains the deadliest natural disaster to ever occur on the Great Lakes.
Sources:
November's Fury by Michael Schumacher: https://www.amazon.com/Novembers-Fury-Deadly-Great-Hurricane/dp/0816687196
The Witch of November
the media always hides everything
until they are not, then they are lying
until they are not, then they are biased
or smth, im not a conspiracy theorist
Or talking about how it's a conspiracy when railroaders have been talking about derailments for years but nobody has been listening
Only until the horse (not you @tough quail ) fucks it all up and released a massive fart cloud over Ohio did people notice and then "its a conspiracy!"
the deepest i went into the weird train conspiracy hole
was they they kept doing the stupid balloon shoot downs to pull attention away from it
not that it was some actual disaster or anything, just because it was embarrassing
seeing the highly positive response to that update
you literally cant change my mind about the fact this was the first devblog just because of the ERA memes
they're doing it again with the most popular nation
alright get in the fucking jet so people stop bitching at us about bumfuck nowhere ohio
germany
panzer iv h vismod, at 3.7
It's a panzer iv disguising itself as a leopard
Why repost
it funny\
because as soon as people stopped giving a shit about the train they stopped doing the balloon stunts
The fucking moronic takes are all I remember.
the takes on social media about both made me realize
man
maybe oppressive totalitarianism isnt that bad an idea
no because that just descends into the people making such conspiracy theories being in even more positions of power
the like one weibo comment i've ever seen was like
There was some dipshit on Reddit that managed to convince thousands of people that a balloon 60,000 feet in the air was carrying ground penetrating radar.
Because ground penetrating radar famously works from high altitude.
"the great firewall is for your protection, not ours. you haven't yet seen the actual meaning of cyberbullying" to some western dude
and that was funny as fuck
He's not immune to propaganda
Oh but it gets better. Supposedly this was to find ICBM silos or something.
Because you can’t see our ICBM silos from fucking Google Earth.
I fucking hate the average understanding of nuclear strategy.
Well you can't see inside them and from what I heard the previous administration had a informal agreement that they let them balloon in exchange for allowing for information exchange if you know what I mean
the balloon was an attack by the bloons administration
GPR isn’t going to see inside them.
the average war understander™️ is fucking hilarious on social media
looks at michael tracey
👁️
I don't know enough go make a comment but i do know the shitposts were fantastic
And to even work on soft ground it would need to be maybe ten feet above it.
Maximum.
i mean what even is the point of targeting ICBMs on land?
even you develop a magical stealth icbm to knock them all out first
subs exist
Taking notes for your Sims 4 house build of course
Half the point of Silos is to absorb nuclear hits.
It’s why China is building so many.
The missile fields are meant to be targets.
The point of MAD is not to target silos so that's kinda pointless
Most of the reason is because you might get some of the missiles.
Counterforce versus countervalue
There’s scenarios where you hit them and scenarios where you don’t.
True
China likely doesn’t target them because their arsenal is too small.
But Russia likely does.
If an enemy wanted to take out their nuclear arsenal then the more silos the better, more things for the enemy to worry about
That’s what China’s doing. Build a ton of silos and only fill some of them, forcing disproportionate targeting.
The U.S. probably has the most capable Counterforce arsenal in the world since the Tridents on the Ohios can target hardened silos with the W88 warhead reaching a 99% PK on one.
U.S. nuclear doctrine is meant to “win” a nuclear war (whether you can actually win one is not the point, the U.S. arsenal is geared to attack hostile nuclear arsenals).
Wasn't that the deal of star wars
Partially
It was also because of Reagan’s personal beliefs.
Part of it was he viewed that the U.S. could achieve a conventional advantage over the USSR.
And he also disliked nukes in general.
Reagan: This space weapon is defensive and will stop your nukes
Ussr: what prevents you using it as a weapon
Reagan: hmmm
Holy Kashino guys i was gone for less than an hour XD
My opinions on Reagan’s intelligence are better left unsaid.
While I do have personal connections in my family to the Star Wars program, I view it as a pretty stupid move.
Undermining deterrence makes the game theory calculation all the more unstable.
Reagan was lucky that Soviets trusted US technology alot
So while %50 of Soviet scientists said such lasers are too advanced to be reality, rest of scientists and mostly government thought they can be real
wasnt
Mig 25 was an interceptor lol its Us's fault to assume she was a fighter
Reagan also the one who said hed tag team on aliens with the soviets
YES
Additionally the U.S. way overestimated the ABM defenses around Moscow.
Wasn't that CIA
I thought thats why he wanted the star wars program thing
He ask Gorbachev if they would side with the US if aliens ever attacked and Gorbachev said he would
Purging the xenos scum with a comrade.
XCOM if it was epic
The moment US underestimated Soviet technology was the moment they lost a U-2 so likely why they never put a SR-71 inside Soviet borders irrc
SR-71 was never meant for overflight.
It used side-looking radars, ELINT, and Cameras.
Makes sense
MS Estonia Mayday Call With Subtitles, Tribute
R.I.P. ESTONIA, 1980-1994
Estonia was sunk in the september 28th, 1994 at 1:50 AM. (GMT +2)
At the time of the accident there were 989 people on the ship, of whom 852 lost their lives.
The wreck rests in about 80 meters of water.
The wreck is located approximately 22 nautical miles (40 kilometr...
The A-12 (similar to SR-71) was used for overflights
It’s pretty hard to tell the two apart but they did have vastly different roles.
Although originally designed to succeed the U-2 overflying the Soviet Union and Cuba, the A-12 was never used for either objective. After a U-2 was shot down in May 1960, the Soviet Union was considered too dangerous to overfly except in an emergency (and overflights were no longer necessary
Ah
Man wish they tried to make A-12 fly over Soviet Union
Really wonder the result
missile launch
accelerates
Kinematics is a bitch.
Flying spy/recon jets over Russia doesn't seem like something anyone should just do on a whim
Apparently almost anyone Scandinavian (specifically Finnish, or Swedish origin) knows of someone who was here. Anyone here with such origins that can confirm it?
I've read many books and statements online that state almost every family in the region knew of someone who was a survivor or perished
You might be able to get it with an ABM missile but I don’t think much else could get something going at Mach 3 at 85,000 feet.
During that day and age.
It isn't that much of a stretch. The probability of anyone having something like three degrees of separation or less to at least one of the 800+ victims is almost 100%
like three degrees of separation or less to at least one of the 800+ victims is almost 100%
What do you mean by degrees of separation?
Everyone is connected to each other at mostly 3 people's length of connection
As in people who know a someone who knows a someone?
The common linguistic theory is that everyone has at most six degrees of separation
yes
Yes
apparently it's now down to three
For example, I myself is connected to a a high ranking government official in just two connections
(for my safety, I shall not reveal more)
Thanks to the internet, I bet.
probably
I only knew about the six degrees of separation due to that one tv show
the one where 2 hosts try to connect 2 things in 6 degrees of separation
sentinelese
*almost everyone

Also worth pointing out the amount of alarms you can hear when Estonia is heard on the radio
Well, yes and no, you may be associated with someone who had studied the sentinelese, and therefore, be connected with them
I guess the keyword here is know or not
oh, "connected"
that's a lot clearer, yeah
but of course the definition of 'associated' or connected' can get pretty vague
There's a reason why its a framework/theory only, and not a formula
Difficult
there are massive bottlenecks
and the one to last interact with them is 800% dead
It’s like some kind of fucked up version of the Erdos number.
In the Cold War most B-52s were based in the midwest right?
I have not seen this anywhere.
If anything it is likely greater; the original 6 is based on the US.
specifically which bases were most of the B-52s based
Fairchild AFB in Spokane Washington had a lot of B-52s.
Barksdale still has them.
What's the nearest commercial airport to Barksdale
I pick three because original question was about the population of a region's relation to disaster that affect mostly populations of that regions, which mostly culturally related in the first place
Even if you're limiting it to familiar relations, three is about right
Shreveport Regional.
Under 10 miles away
Hmm lemme check if my KSP mod has SHV as an airport here
I wanna see how far my bombers can reach flying from where SAC was supposed to be based from
Star Wars was meant to be a complete defense against a nuclear strike on the US
Minot International is also less than 10 miles away from Minot AFB.
Nope this mod doesn't have SHV as an airport
any other larger well know airport close to Barksdale?
Try Spokane
while the US does have the means to intercept a nuclear ballistic missile strike, it's only really rated to handle a handful of missiles
I'm asking due to KSP. I have the Real life Solar System mod and I'm wondering how far my planes can reach from irl bases the B-52s were supposed to be based on
There’s nothing else really close to Barksdale
also that's not really true
well sorta
Like I said in the convo above it really depends.
you can undermine MAD if you can strike first and eliminate the target's nuclear weapons
There were B-52s based in upstate New York near Albany?
a bunch of IR scholars freaked out in the early 2000s bc they realized that at that point, the US basically had that capability
“Super Fuzes” go brrrrrr
The combination of a lack of Russian situational awareness, dangerously short warning times, high-readiness alert postures, and the increasing US strike capacity resulting from a new fuzing system for submarine-based nuclear missiles has created a deeply destabilizing and dangerous strategic nuclear situation.
Good read on the topic
the one my prof had the class read was this https://www.belfercenter.org/publication/end-mad-nuclear-dimension-us-primacy
Can the United States destroy the long-range nuclear arsenals of China and Russia ? Keir Lieber and Daryl Press argue that not only does the United States have a potent first-strike capability, but that the nuclear balance will continue to shift in its favor, creating significant implications for international relations and U.S. foreign policy.
Plattsburgh
ah 2006, a simpler time
Right. @thorn trail looking up stuff about pre-1991 Strategic air command would get results
B-52s are based mostly out of Louisiana, North Dakota, Guam, Florida and California iirc but there was many more bases during the cold War that were closed down after the fall of the soviet union
Defence Strategic Review dropped
very interesting just read it
ADF to see a fundamental restructuring over the next decade, with some urgent restructuring to occur in the next 2 years, which are a danger period for the Indo-Pacific
I wish certain countries in the region also come into sense and start bolstering their naval and air defense capability instead of only the armies
everyone is going to focus on ADFs desires to acquire new capabilities but I think that that's missing the point
who?
New Zealand?
Nah, the "barrier"
indonesia?
No B-21s though, which is a little unfortunate
the biggest two recommendations made by the review are thus
firstly a shift away from the Defence of Australia doctrine and towards a strategy of National Defence, with capabilities that reinforce this doctrinal shift, this is Australias largest doctrinal shift since the 1976 white paper
secondly ADF will shift away from being a balanced force towards being an integrated force, meaning ADF intends to reduce or lose some general capabilities which ADF does not consider necessary for the National Defence strategy
nuclear submarines are a far better investment
our whitepapers are boring
I’m not familiar with the Australian side, but the US is pretty open to selling
just “we will procure high-effectiveness hyunmoo missile” over and over
We know you’re procuring high-effectiveness Hyunmoo missiles
ADF will also stop producing white papers and begin publishing National Defence Strategy on a biennial basis
now explain why the TEL has 10 axles
Stop calling unrelated missiles "hyunmoo" as a start
Fair enough
Oh it’s a comprehensive review isn’t it
I’m too used to reading it done service by service
no
We will call everything Hyunmoo
ADF exists at a scale where comprehensive reviews are not only possible but also advisable
it confounds everyone
also, Australias purchase of K9 will be cancelled in favour of HIMARS
Second purchase.
you're right yes thats my bad
The first one has a contract signed, and if Australia goes back on that we’re going to demonstrate our missiles go 50% further whenever we feel like it.
Guess that makes sense, HIMARS has been getting some good advertising recently
oh you guys are going for a land-based maritime strike capability too
that’s what the marines are pivoting to focus on
Australia was already a major investor in developing the replacement for ATACMS (Precision Strike Missile) and this development will be accelerated with increased funding
Need to develop our own PrSM.
Army is shifting towards a force structure that will resemble the USMC
Peddle it with Chunmoo.
Makes sense. I mean, where and how else the fights will be fought realistically
well this is the whole idea of shifting towards a strategy of National Defence rather than simply Defence of Australia
Unlike the marines though, I assume you all will be keeping the Abrams around
Defence of Australia was always focused on internal defence, protecting the major cities and potential terror attacks, whereas National Defence is about protecting the nation as a whole
All Australian involvement in any conflict will almost certainly expeditional in nature
I can only assume the Abrams program will be going ahead as planned, as the DSR makes no mention of it
that’s what I’d guess too
We got what we wanted with Redback.
The marines dropped tanks bc they knew the army could do that job for them
Besides, the amount of foreign tech in that thing’s insane. No biggie.
If you’re talking the main army then it’s a fair assumption that they’re staying around
this has not necessarily been the case in the War on Terror, but the DSR is a fundamental restructuring of ADF away from a force for fighting the post-cold-war conflicts and towards a peer opponent conflict
Only thing that’s left to do is to develop a missile more fit for TEL.
given that DSR recommends accelerated development of LCM and LCH, I would presume Army wants greater capability to deploy its M1s rather than reducing its investment in tanks
LAND400 will be reduced from 400 to 129 vehicles however
What was LAND400?
No mention of seabasing?
none
Disappointing, but only a little.
ADF will also be shoring up its communication lines through the interior, with explicit mention of the Indian Ocean Bases, and fuel storage and logistics towards the interior bases will need to be dramatically enhanced, and government intervention will be necessary to support civil fuel storage which is about to be decommissioned, in support of ADF operations
RAAF in particular needs greater capability to disperse and harden
DSR recognises that while a direct invasion of the Australian mainland is a remote possibility, the primary threat to Australia and ADF assets comes from long ranged strikes and incursions into our EEZ
far northern australia is ADFs largest strategic asset but also its greatest strategic liability
Just gib big enough hyunmoo to bonk tasmania already
so we can also whack most of Central Asia
Let central asia alone, lol
Not like anyone even remotely know wtf they're doing anyway, much less what they're up to
Osborne shipyard must immediately start expanding its facilities for the construction of the nuclear submarines
Henderson does not have enough work to sustain the number of shipbuilders at the facility, as it is a major base for maintenance and upgrade, government intervention must ensure its long term sustainability
the shipbuilding sustainment program must be enhanced and expanded to provide Australia with a persistent shipbuilding capability
By God I will drop two dozen 1-ton thermobaric bombs on Beijing with one missile
Isn’t there a proposal to mount LRASM on HIMARS?
Nice
screaming
Meanwhile I’m just here waiting for OMFV news like
You guys should buy the Nimitz.
I think that’s a great idea.
We need to sell stuff
Nah Nimitz’s time has gone
do you think we can just shit out personnel or something?
HOMARS must rule
Isn’t that how people are born?
Angus Houston can't just look at a man and within minutes have him in uniform
She was designed for 50 years of operation and she’ll be hitting that mark right before retirement
it isnt 2013 anymore
New coat of paint and she’s good as new.
(no she isn’t)
If Australia likes having an immobile derelict hulk it is a good purchase.
another recommendation made by the DSR is that ADF needs to immediately rectify its personnel retainment and recruitment issues
Conscription
Conscription
Navy in particular, has the greatest challenges in this regard
I feel like every military around the world just nodded in unison
conscription is not only a very bad idea for ADF (it's a bad idea for most militaries) but is also politically impossible
recruitment and retention’s been tough the last few years
Recruitment’s been tough for the last few years
Skill issue
conscription is excellent for large forces which operate very basic and simple heavy equipment
that equipment is however, less capable
you cannot train a conscript on HIMARS in peacetime
(yes you can)
Simple. Conscript only college grads.
This is a financially smart move.
Conscription’s not something you’re really meant to take out of the toolbox often, if at all
ROKA runs on barrel-scraping conscripts and it’s doing just fine.
they are specialised pieces of equipment and require years of investment to create professional personnel
there is a very good reason why the ROK relies on guns rather than precision strike
(man freezes to death)
I said it’s fine!
an unprofessional, conscripted ADF is an ADF that cannot defend Australia
I’m sorry I can’t hear you over the sound of 10,000 Chunmoo rockets per year
3000 Chunmoos of the ROK
Australia must maintain a professional corps of highly trained personnel
HIMARS don't need the entire crew to be NCO
Most complex systems don't either. That's realistically how any conscript-based military will operate
a large pool of untrained and unmotivated personnel will only degrade capability
There’s a reason why most militaries run on the professional model
I have yet to witness a modern expeditionary force that uses conscription
Using conscript for expeditionary force is how you lose support fast
all conscript forces rely on their armies for internal conflict, or short distance land conflicts with bordering countries
or any offense for that matter
if ADF is to shift to a National Defence Strategy, it must maintain a professional corps of highly trained personnel
ADF is also to reintroduce a ready reserve force by 2025
Buying Nimitz is a scam now 
Reactors don't go well with age
One of their downsides
Can't use them long as normal propulsion ships
QE may outlive Ford
elaborate
I'm not too knowledgable about aircraft carrier reactors, but regular reactor lifespans seem to be doing fine
Carrier reactors have a very specific designed life.
After this, they must be thrown away.
In theory, it is possible to replace many of the components which are designed with limited life (all of them) and continue operating, but this would be prohibitively expensive; the reactor was never designed for such a thing.

the great thing about land nuclear reactors is that you dont need to take apart an entire ship to get to them
Let's say if you design your nuclear carrier as to operate 50 years
It will go long as that
Trying to milk it more will make her worse
Land reactors also have life-limited components (again, all components are), but they can be replaced relatively easily and they have greater margins for error.
Also the reason nuclear ships are hard museums to become
You need to rip out the reactor from inside
Then either close it again or left that hole there
Yeah
They undergo a refueling and refurbishment period midway through life
Then once again near the end.
It is designed to be RCOHed once.
Some of the life-limited components can be replaced in that time.
Not all of them.
Wonder if we will live long enough to see her replacement
Design likely pop in 2060s
was more referring to lifespans
Ah
but in any case, obsolescence is defined by capability, not weakness
A ship that cannot move is obsolete.
Or dangerous to itself
Can i finish?
Nuclear carriers are bought so they can immediately get going to wherever they need to go, without having to refuel
having a shelf life on their reactors doesn't directly impact this capability
and said capability is a rather important one to the usn
British chill with Diesel
when dongfengs can come flying around at disturbingly often times
being stuck refueling is not a good idea
You still need to refuel for plane fuel and crew food but ye
For example:
People say the horse became obsolete in ww1 because machine guns; not true. They were still used a lot on the eastern front, and the germans brought MGs there
the reason is there's a lot less trenches and barbed wire on the eastern front, which prevented the horse's capability of flanking the enemy quickly







