#history
1 messages · Page 98 of 1
How they even plan to balance that shit?
I mean she normally use a 130mm/60 gun
The barrel needed for that 100000++ PSI chamber pressure is going to be way heavier tho
What the fuck are those
Pretty standard looking shells
BC -> battlecruiser, pretty much a battleship with slightly different characteristics depending on the time period and navy in question
BM-> Monitor, smaller vessels armed with a single battleship caliber turret
Actually they don't need to be BB caliber but still
I think some south american navy still uses the term monitor for a ship armed with a
76mm

river monitor is a different breed tbf
at least they won't be "BM"
The British aircraft carrier HMS Prince of Wales, which broke down in October 2022, will leave the docks with a delay in 2024 due to improper repairs, the Daily Mail newspaper reports.
Earlier, the Times newspaper, citing the Ministry of Defense, reported that the aircraft carrier HMS Prince of Wales, the largest ship in the British fleet, since commissioning in 2019, was more often in the docks for repairs than at sea.

SpaceX is targeting as soon as Thursday, April 20 for the first flight test of a fully integrated Starship and Super Heavy rocket from Starbase in Texas. The...
5 min left
1 minute
Halt for 40 seconds

I hope it blows up
Highly possible
Good
💥
Slow
Apollo 11 was going at 122km/s at some point
Ok nvm 7 miles per second
But still fast af
7 miles is 11.2 km
I forgot a comma

Blow up

Trash
Get Entered to WIN this authentic 101st Airborne M17!
https://go.getenteredtowin.com/forgottenweapons
DEADLINE to ENTER is 04/28/23 @ 11:59pm (PST).
Social media is very excited these days about "exploding" SIG 320s...so let's consider what might actually be happening.
Of course, this discussion is invariably clouded by the fact that the P320...
That's three times solar system's escape velocity lol
Neil be like ends up in proxima centauri
I FORGOT A COMMA 
why are we hoping cool space engine stuff blows up
elon musk
Elon wants to use his cramped pointy trashcan of a ship to fly 100 people to mars (they would all die) and also use it for things like flying from say LA to Tokyo in 3 hours instead of half a day

There’s nothing cool about it
It’s a hyped piece of environmental terrorism
Cutting flight times sounds like something only the ultra elite would benefit from.
This is Thailand's only CV in the CVH type, and I like our CV, it's named the HTMS Chakri Naruebet
How long have we been doing and sticking to subsonic flights?
Our CV is small compared to USS Kitty Hawk (bottom)
Built in 1993, launched in 1996
I've been on the ship once and it feels great
I took these pictures in 2016, when I was on this ship
What a cutie
let me censor the faces
It's small, and it's the only aircraft carrier in the Royal (Thai) Navy.
Nevertheless it is a CVH class aircraft carrier
People would line up, buy tickets and tour the ship at their leisure
it's open to the public, but only while it's stationary and not in duty
It's still an active duty CV
Ever since we figure out that time doesn't really equal that much money for 99.9% of the potential passengers
@manic latch
F
God Willing one day it will be true.
just finished watching all Quiet in the western front,damm...
When is All Loud in the Eastern Front
lol
Why Richie hate Starship?
Elon
I like spaceship, purely so we can have a space navy and start shooting slug/missile/laser at each other.
Imagine 16inch gun but in space
Man, I want it so bad
You want wars I see
Not really, I want to see a good weapon system and space battleship
For what
Bc why not
Purely a child like dream of mine, been playing with model, reading novel and playing sim game, maybe in my life time I will get to see something like that become real thing
Wait, if weight in space is meaningless and the only limitation is propulsion, how realistically can you make a space battleship?
Like full on vessel of war, no shuttle conversion, completely armed with big gun, missile and CIWS.
Honestly I thought the movie was kind of meh, and the book was a lot better
Bruh, weight is maybe meaningless, but mass is definitely still bog you down
Good luck accelerating 100000 tons of anything
Now that in space propulsion reaction force is exclusively coming from your own fuel instead of the environment around you, the mass limitation should be even greater than on earth for a foreseeable future
the book made me imagine,the movie just straight up made me tear up
The things that bugged me were things like the fact that the German general just seemed like a caricature of mustache twirling evil, and they cut the scene where he went home
And the "score" just bugged me
So until we get a better and more efficient thruster, no space battleship?
We all know where this is going
Unless you want your battleship to be 90% fuel, sure
Where is Epstein drive when you need it
Epstein drive
Thrustintofrom minors?
Not that pervert, the Expanse one
We do have a wide array of electro/magnetic drives. Problem is that most of the designs are in some way a compromise between thrust (power) and specific impulse (efficiency), not both
None are scalable to large engines so far, tho that's partially caused by our reluctance to lob nuclear reactor into space
That looks like someone assembled a Schelde S.21 but mixed up the engine and cockpit.
Children of A Dead Earth is probably the best game that “realistically” simulates space combat.
Granted it has less a learning curve and more learning cliff (and has an annoying lack of gold-beryllium tampers for nukes) but it’s generally very good at depicting space combat.
Conventional space combat is all about kinetic energy missiles while with nukes it would probably devolve to Casaba Howitzers and Excalibur type X-Ray weapons sniping vessels from thousands of kilometers away.
Hypervelocity KEP is pretty much the game here
Thermoelectric junctions don't even "work" 
Also cheating the calculation with comically sized calcium pump impeller
@ivory ridge I think I have entered Turkish youtube
yes
that guy
I'm currently trying to research Ottoman ships and guns
it's...
weird
Turns out female pandas can spontaneously delete pregnancy of a baby of a male panda they don’t like

Krem
remember the Russo-Ottoman war of 1877?
Ye
They sank Lütf-i Celil with deck piercing mortars
Lütf-i Celil was built in France

friend hurt my ship
krem y
Sold her to wrong person
she wasn't sold to the Ottomans
She was sold to Egypt
but the Ottomans took Egypt
remember
what?
F
why the 
"I can't carry anymore"
Honestly I like the way clean F-16 without the enlarged spine looks better than the block 70s with enlarged spine and CFTs
Both look cool though cuz F-16 is awesome
it can always carry more
Sign up to War Thunder for Free! Dominate the skies get to smashing some tankies:
https://playwt.link/milaviationhistory
The Fiat G.91 is a hidden gem of the early Cold War period but its story, inspired through a quite rational NATO standardization program, is one of delays, compromises and ultimately falling far short of the initial exceptio...
Now I’m actually curious how much ordinance you can actually fit in the F-16
15k pounds

How did you find?
He searched your name
at one point I managed to break twitter into thinking I spoke French somehow
Twitter just thinks I speak Japanese and Chinese
Lepanto?
The Battle of Navarino was a naval battle fought on 20 October (O. S. 8 October) 1827, during the Greek War of Independence (1821–29), in Navarino Bay (modern Pylos), on the west coast of the Peloponnese peninsula, in the Ionian Sea. Allied forces from Britain, France, and Russia decisively defeated Ottoman and Egyptian forces which were trying ...
Why did you say Lepanto. There is Ottoman and Russian navy flags in art 
I not saw the Russian flags.

“Viper, it’s time for your weekly upgrade so I can post you on r/chonkers.”
“General Dynamics I am dying of airframe fatigue.”
Mfs wings boutta snap off
Saw a raptor today but I wasn’t allowed to take pics
Damn
Gun port was open
So?
So they don’t want people taking pictures of the hatch for the gun
🤤

They wanted to keep all that Gussy to themselves.
Plon
Ah
I thought so
I heard she was broken down by a Razor company
how true that is idk
or that’s where the metal ended up
Nah, that's a meme
she just got scrapped as usual
The likelihood of her survival as a museum ship is pretty nil anyways, with the damage she's sustained
How bad was she at the end?
I know she was bombed several times but I mean, even Avrora was literally sunk and fixed
I thought it was less her state of repairs and more of Lack of funding
Halsey wanted to save her
Some veterans were glad that she was scrapped though
@chilly flower is there any way to tell the difference between an A-36 and a P-51 besides the flaps on the wings?
the flaps are basically perfectly camouflaged into the wings if they're not extended

Well, how many times had that happened to Museum ships?
I mean, I definitely understand the sentiment
losing your friends on them just to see a kid putting gum there must kill people
That's the only instance that I'm absolutely certain of
The anti-air cruiser Colbert was a museum for a while, but then was scrapped about a decade ago
I find it ironic how Yorky and Hornet were saved through their successors
even before I had heard of AL, I always felt ships develop a sort of soul
or personality
The one other obvious external difference would probably be the nose-mounted .50s below the propeller, otherwise it is still very similar to the P-51A in most regards
warships are one of the more anthropomorphized objects
On 19 April 1944, the Royal Navy's Eastern Fleet carries out its first aircraft carrier strike, attacking the Imperial Japanese Navy (IJN) base at Sabang Island in the Dutch East Indies.
Spurred on by reduced activity in the Mediterranean and the IJN's Indian Ocean Raid, which we covered in posts on 1 and 16 March, the British Admiralty decided in January 1944 to dispatch 146 warships to reinforce Admiral James Sommerville's Eastern Fleet (EF), based at Trincomalee, Ceylon.
The US Navy also temporarily transferred the aircraft carrier USS Saratoga and three destroyers to Royal Navy command to free up British ships for Operation Tungsten, the raid on Tirpitz, covered in our 3 April post. Saratoga arrived at the EF base on 2 April.
On 12 April, planning was finalized for Operation Cockpit, a carrier strike on the IJN's base on Sabang, requested by US Chief of Naval Operations Admiral King to cover the US amphibious landings at Hollandia, New Guinea, planned for 22 April.
A genuinely multinational fleet of 27 warships departed Ceylon on 16 April. Aircraft carrier HMS Illustrious, battleships HMS Queen Elizabeth and Valiant, and battlecruiser HMS Renown, four cruisers, and seven destroyers were joined by USS Saratoga, three USN destroyers, French battleship Richelieu, Dutch cruiser HNLMS Tromp and a destroyer, the New Zealand cruiser HMNZS Gambia and four Australian destroyers. Under Admiral Sommerville's overall command, the ships are organized into Task Force 69 and 70, a battleship covering force, and a carrier force, respectively.
At 0530 hours today, 19 April, Illustrious launches 17 Barracudas and 13 F4Us, and Saratoga launches 24 F6Fs, 18 SBD Dauntless', and 11 TBF Avengers some 100 miles (160 km) southwest of Sabang.
At 0700 hours, the attack begins, surprising the Japanese anti-aircraft defenses and planes. The dive bombers destroy three of the four oil tanks and the harbor facilities, while the fighters destroy 21 Japanese planes on the island's two airfields. Only one F6F is lost, but the submarine HMS Tactician quickly rescues the pilot.
Picture: HMS Unicorn (I72, left) and HMS Illustrious (87) at Trincomalee, Ceylon, 1944
Source: US Naval Museum
what was the most damaged ship that made it back to port from battle? I couldn't find a answer on google
I would say Laffey for the US's side but im not sure

I mean she got hit by how many bullets bombs and kamikazes?
a lot
I would try looking into ships battle damage logs
If you can get em
Cuz some ships got severe hits and some bad damage but never got a lot of recognition simply because of the warship type, involvement, and the likes
where do i get them?
Like Laffey got pummeled to high hell but you reaaaaally dont hear her mentioned much
Not sure tbh
Try checking some museum websites and see if you can get them there
If not than check Wikipedia, then any .gov sites that might possibly have it

https://www.navy.mil might have some useful stuff but im too lazy to bother going into a full search at 23,32 lol
Keep in mind im literally thinking up an entire process at midnight just off of the top of my head so i genuinely have no idea if that would work or if its even related lol
Marblehead had a truly epic voyage
Today we examine the career of USS Marblehead, with particular focus on how her crew managed to coax a half-broken ship from the Java Sea to New York, with a few stops along the way.
Want to support the channel? - https://www.patreon.com/Drachinifel
Want a shirt/mug/hoodie - https://shop.spreadshirt.com/drachinifels-dockyard/
Want a medal? -...
But there would be a lot of different contenders for that award, depending on what you count as severity of damage.
Like there are a fair number of stories of ships getting their bows blown off and crap, some of which had to sail in reverse all the way to port
Uhh
Well say the most devastating damage in ways like, you should not have survived and its a god damn miracle
I personally think Laffey would take the title because of her being a thinskinned destroyer just tanking kamikaze attacks, bombs, unholy amounts of strafing, and similar
That’s not a very precise description
You could for instance, argue nawlins deserves the award since her bow fell right off
Or you might argue javelin because she split in fucking two and lived
Belfast got her keel turbofucked by a mine but somehow lived and got a refit

Which ship got the better blessing?
It’s really a subjective thing
Lol
There is no right answer
Guess so
Even if you were to go by a more solid metric such as “tons of water in ship as percent of ships overall displacement”
Yknow what fuck it
Well
Who got hit with more tonnage of armament lol
It’s pretty fucking hard to measure that
Well
Define tonnage
An AP shell or an HE shell can weigh the same and do vastly different amounts of damage
Fuck
Hey my Econ prof is Dutch and he’s a cool guy
Two ships come to mind for "most damaged"
Seydlitz, at 25k design tonnes, sucking up 5k tonnes of water at Jutland and making it home
SS Ohio, "back broken" and quite literally sank as soon as she limped into Malta and her precious oil was offloaded.
What was that uboat that had a big fuck off hole in the stern again?
I'd say jabbers might be the most damaged
less than 50% of her original hull was even on her
There was a photo of a U boat with a holr in the stern that was just
Blap
Huge fucking hole
And it made it back home
Huge hole in the stern, you say?...
Holes in the bow and stern are very survivable

well no water is flowing in so we good as new
Especially aft, where the screws and rudder result in a mostly empty underwater portion
Well and the fact that ships have watertight bulkheads running from bow to stern, which can all be closed so that water only gets in one or two compartiment. With breaches on the side this might be many more and the water will also be able to flood via the sides
Reno took some hefty damage and survived, ate a torpedo in the aft half of the ship and took on a few thousand tons of water
See SS Vesta surviving but SS Arctic sinking
See SS Andrea Doria
Etc
Tough as a brick
Similar with Leipzig, she also returned under her own power. For better or for worse
That’ll buff out
They didn't bother
Repaired the hull, but didn't fix the machinery, and pulled shitzig from active service

Fun Fact
the most successful Torpedo Attack in naval history was performed by the heavy cruiser IJN Mogami
with a torpedo salvo of 6 torpedoes as the heavy cruiser USS Northhampton
of the torpedoes, all Long Lances, five hit, each of them hitting a different ship, and each torpedo sinking said ship
as such, Mogami was successfully able to sink 5 ships with a salvo of six torpedoes
issue is, all five of those ships were also japanese, making this not just the most successful torpedo attack in naval history, but also the most successful multi-Teamkill in naval history
I'm honestly more impressed with I-19's spread which resulted in the sinking of a carrier (Wasp), a destroyer (O'Brien) and the damaging of a battleship (NC)
But it's not as meme worthy
France selling ironclads to the Egyptians in 1868
The Ottomans take Egypt and thus said ironclads
Greece buys new French Ironclads in 1885
Greco-Ottoman war
French ironclad vs French ironclad


That’s called a sustainable business model.
The last time the RAAF operated seaplanes was 1950, but is there an argument to bring back some sort of modern amphibious seaplane? FLGOFF Joakim Siira thinks there are several – from tactical concepts associated with climate change to strategic relationships with key partners in our region. Years ago, before I joined the Royal Australian Air Fo...
Interestingly the article says an RAAF purchase of Japanese seaplanes would be their first purchase from an Asian country
The 30s really were a wacky time

seaplane e2 hawkeye
source from different server
USS minneapolis with some damage
slighly damaged USS lindsey
Yeah
Javelin also survived since torps hit her bow and stern
If both hit middle it would be unlikely
Torpedo hits amidships are deadly in the sense that they knock out your machinery/power to the whole ship
Oh fuck, there goes our water mains
Or if your ship is hit in the proximity multiple times, you just die
See: Helena (and partially Littorio)
And possibility to breach two compartiments at the same time
Looks like my grandpa served in the Italian army in WW2. Not sure how I feel about that. Might invest a little more in my Italian fleet

Still afloat
Point stands
Losing the bow also means you lose the potential weight that would’ve otherwise dragged down the ship
You can’t really lose the side of your ship
Losing bow and stern aren't that uncommon, ngl
See: Suzutsuki
and my personal favourites: bent duck
or I-lost-half-of-my-ship-kaze

depends on your definition of battle and made it back
because Frank E Evans had a bad time
Don't worry, we're still sailing half a ship
Same thing
If you lose the flooding section and you can close the correct bulkheads to prevent any water from coming in the latter sections you can save your ship
But once the machinery gets fucked you better start planning shit
I feel like Japan shoot themself in the foot with Kamakizes
kamikazes made sense in Japan's situation actually
They bearly sunk ships and wasting aircraft.
T-95 is just a T-90 wearing makeup
What
Can you explain me how
Alright sorry about that
for the first few months of their employment, Kamikazes achieved disproportionate results, inflicting significant damage for a minimal employment of aircraft
it did not however, take long for the Allies to grow wise to the Kamikaze, leading to a direct and swift decline in their effectiveness
regardless, Japan did not have the instructors, nor the fuel to train pilots effectively, in order to create an effective aerial fighting force in 1944
as a result, the Kamikaze program was the single effective method the Japanese had of reliably inflicting damage against Allied task forces
Japan was facing a shortage of both aircraft and pilots
in a twisted sense the kamikazes let them conserve aircraft more than if they'd sent out squadrons of bombers with fighter escort
the alternative was to attempt to train pilots on complex and risky aerial attacks against an opponent with a quickly improving anti-aircraft capability, without the resources to train a substantial number of those pilots
Japan had the aircraft, it just had no one to fly them effectively
it was cold and calculated, but it worked, at least for a time
and even after the initial surprise worse off, the Japanese still managed some dramatic feats, such as against the USS Bunker Hill, which was crippled by 2 kamikaze strikes in may 1945, well after the Americans had supposedly defeated the Kamikaze as a viable weapons system

Would the kamikazes woulda been more effective if they had faster planes?
doesn't mean kamikazes accelerated their defeat
actually it kept them fighting for longer
The production power in 1944 was in full force. America just could replace the ships sunk
depends on the ship
Destroyers for sure
sure you could print a liberty ship in a week flat but larger ships take time no matter how good your industry is
I feel like Japan could only win in 42 to early 43
no
obviously, yes, but that makes no difference in the minds of Japanese strategic planners
The true mvp in the pacific war was submarines

what, for more penetration?
More warcrimes yay
what about the Catalinas who made their operations considerably easier?
kamikazes were already loaded up with explosives so its not like they lacked any punch
True
and they already gave allied aa more trouble than a normal aircraft
Not getting hit by AA
getting hit doesn't stop them
with a kamikaze you had to shoot the plane apart to prevent it from hitting the ship
it was afterall the RAAFs aerial mining operations that halted large numbers of Japanese merchants outside of valuable ports in the Dutch East Indes, allowing American submarines to sail in and clear the opposition
it obviously wasnt the entire war against Japanese shipping but it was enough to dedicate 1/4 of all American boats to Australian ports

hell there were even some raids against Southern China towards the end of the war
by?
the RAAF
the Japanese afterall occupied considerable parts of mainland China as late as 1945, even launching a decisively successful offensive against the Chinese
I like reading about other parts of history. Like the flying tigers
Japan was never going to win. Not unless everyone in the U.S. and Britain gains a room temperature IQ overnight.
That random brony
wha
twitter moment
“The Industrial Revolution and its consequences…”
What made Kamikaze's so effective is that they could saturate the USN's C2 networks.
The ability of a CIC to direct fighter patrols to intercept attacks based on what information came in via radar (and other means) made conventional attack tactics - generally concentrated flights of bombers - much easier to counter.
However, Kamikaze attackers were not deliverying standard payloads, and thus did not need to come in large groups. Rather, they came in lots of small flights, which overwhelmed the ability of the human staff in the CIC to keep up with. But, because of the nature of picture-centric warfare, CIC staff really had no idea how badly they were falling behind reality.
As this air-sea picture broke down, the effectiveness of fighter-vectoring broke down and they became much less effective. This also applied to gun-based AA and the ability of the CIC to assign targets to gun groups.
And then, when you combine with with the fact that these aircraft were simply trying to flying into ships, it meant that AA had to be able to actually destroy them rather than just deter and mess up the accurate delivery of ordnance.
This is actually more similar to missile attack rather than air attack and is why you can trace a direct line from the USN's experience off Okinawa to the development of AEGIS.
It’s really fascinating that we saw the first AWACs emerge from this with converted B-17s.
Other AEW platforms like the converted Avengers were eventually integrated via primitive datalink (though this wouldn’t happen until after the war from what I’ve seen).
Kamikazes are more analogous to modern ASMs in operation than even contemporary ASMs of WWII were.
The CAP, AEW, Air-Defense, and C2 elements that emerged as a result of them are still present in the fleet.
The Outer, Inner, and Point-Defense Air-Battles are still applicable.
Why Midway didn't had 76mm
I suspect that she was simply designed with the 40mm, and ships in service had the priority on 76mm gun fittings.
Hence, commissioned with 40mm Bofors, and then those get replaced by 3"/50 Mk.33's once there's time in the 1950s



Hit him with the hellcat kd
I've seen analogies of the Ohka being more akin to a guided missile rather than an aircraft, just with human meat inside.
nah thats just human guidance
Today’s video is going to cover the Saladin R concept from Alvis
This vehicle aimed at export for the middle east took the turret from the scimitar or fox and plonked it more or less on the Saladin. - armed with a 30mm Rarden gun with a 2-man crew it was designed for a variety of roles.
Although a nice shiny brochure was made, none were ever ...
Well because it basically is an ASM. It’s about as fast a Harpoon in terminal dive and while it’s not anywhere near as sea-skimming, there had to be several iterations of VT fuze for low angle fire.
FCS had to be updated to an 800 knot maximum target speed to compensate.
The Betty’s that carried them were the Backfires and Badgers of their day.
Do not consume the chocolate powder.
The missile knows where it is because someone is sitting inside of it
But how does the human know where it is?
SHHHHHH not important
I mean think about it, we know where we are because we see the area around us. IE: we know where we aren’t.
At heart we are all missile guidance subsystems.

We use electro-optical terrain-following with gyroscopic stabilization. What is hearing and touch but permutations of passive acoustic listening devices?
We have chem sniffers, both remote and for individual samples.
Can you see all that say for certainty that you are not a missile guidance subsystem, pursuing it’s own vector of approach?
Make the best of what remains to your Time on Target, when your journey finally ends. Do not fear it, rather embrace the journey that brings you there.
Datalink with the rest of the threat cloud and lead others down unique threat vectors. Force others to adapt, with those standing in your way launching chaff and decoys to bait you away from your final destination.
But do not be swayed, remember to filter your targets and utilize sensor fusion to see the true end-goal.
Be the VAMPIRE everyone strives to be.
Man just gave me a existential crisis
Know where you aren’t and you can find where you are.

How did you make Missile guidance and our own Senses so existential
He’s the sentient missile guidance system
It was revealed to me in a dream by our lord and savior Raytheon.
Lockheed mart gang
Nice

A prototype of the world-class ECRS Mk2 radar for the UK’s Typhoon fleet has been delivered to @BAESystemsplc flight-testing facility. The radar will undergo integration work & ground-based testing in prep for first flights next year.
@Leonardo_UK | https://t.co/5lz85dgqZl
156
No AESA for Typhoons till 2030


the goodest of content

Man homie roll up to me with this
Im runnin his shit
CHEETAH

snoop snoop
Europoors keep losing.
Cheetah 
The Atlas Cheetah is a South African fighter aircraft designed and produced by the aviation company Atlas Aircraft Corporation (later Denel Aeronautics). It was developed at the behest of, and principally operated by, the South African Air Force (SAAF).
The Cheetah was developed amid the Border War of the 1980s as a major upgrade of the French-b...
never really clicks just how well equipped the Chilean airforce is

Fascinatingly, I think USS Stanly managed to at the very least knock out/make the pilot of one of the Ohkas that was targetting her. If I recall, it hit the mast of the ship, took the flag down, and crashed into the sea.
That is after she ate one Ohka too and that earlier one overpenetrated.
(Stanly is underappreciated in AL, fite me)
you ever just
T-55 hull, sure
centurion hull apparently
I honestly have no idea the hulls i just know BMP turret
KHAAAAAAARKOOOOOOOVVVVVVVV
F35s probably next
Not enough ERA
(it is actually a kharkovite design)
in this case the batshit insanity is slightly reasonable
was a tender for a Jordan IFV as essentially a conversion of their swathes of old centurions they were replacing with challengers

Ah
They have a lower RCS.
A clean Superhornet is about as stealthy as an Su-57.
That says more about the “Felon” than it does about Rhino but it demonstrates the degree to which the RCS has been reduced.
The Block III versions incorporate even more features like that.
There’s a decent chance the Block III is stealthier than the Su-57 from the frontal aspect which is just… kinda sad TBH.
Yeah
True, but the Russians don’t seem to have S-ducting and RAM coatings down for whatever reason.
The Su-57 might actually be decent if they had committed to making a LO aircraft but they made too many half-way measures because they wanted it to fit in their WVR doctrine.
No budget?
Skill issue
whats the WVR doctrine again?
is the RAM coating about the rivet meme

Just having a greater emphasis on close-in dogfights and maneuverability.
The Soviets had a real winner in the R-73 missile with off-bore-sight tracking, giving them a distinct advantage at close range.
But with new western systems and with the budget cuts of the 90s, Russia didn’t really properly develop BVR beyond their interceptor force, meaning that it’s been atrophied.

Then Horsememe,spread your wisdom
its a weird logic trap people fall into when they think about the thrust vectoring gimmick, in that it somehow makes the jets worse at BVR
spoilerinos is does not

Leading edge slats on a LO aircraft does make it worse.
there is more to BVR than frontal RCS
its not a magical on-off switch and not the only thing that determines if you're BVR capable
Thrust vectoring is fine, see the F-22, but many of the design decisions to improve kinematic performance come at the cost of money, weight, range, and radar cross-section.
i.e the US generally playing catchup as far as radar missiles go given they were generally out developed in that regard
which is, err, a bit of an impirtant aspect
Number designations or actual names?
like Aim-9X and stuff
So let’s start with the letters
K
ok go on professor 641
The first letter denotes the launch platform, A for aircraft, R for surface vessel, M for mobile ground launcher, and U for submarines.
There’s some other like L for silos (used on ICBM designations) and C, which as far as I know only applied to the BOMARC SAM (as it was launched from a “coffin”) but the ones I listed first are the primary ones you see.
Second letter says what it does. D for Decoy, C for Transport, Q for targets.
Most of the time you’ll see I, G, and U for that. I stands for Intercept and is used on SAMs and AAMs. G is for ground attack, like a AGM-65 Maverick. U is for anti-submarine weapons like the RUR-5 ASROC.
The third letter tells you what kind of weapon it is. M is a missile. R is a rocket (unguided flight).
The number is the design number. These fall into a series shared by all U.S. missiles and rockets.
As for the final letter/Block designation.
Generally a letter designates a major upgrade while a block indicates a more modest change (though on some weapons like the RIM-66 this is stretched to the breaking point).
actually curious do we have any images of JATM?
since all I see popping up is the weird dual stage missile
I’ve looked and can’t seem to find anything that isn’t fake or a simulator
all we really have is Raytheon's LREW

Aim-260 JATM
Speaking of the RIM-66, it is also known as the SM-2MR, standing for Standard Missile-2 Medium Range. A Standard MR has just a body wheras a Standard ER possesses a booster.
Standard Missiles all possess a normal designation (see RIM-66) but are also known under their series.
SM-1MR and ER denoted the early versions of the RIM-66 and RIM-67 respectively.
SM-2 MR and ER denotes later versions that have datalinks for midcourse guidance (at least that’s how I understand the distinction).
The RIM-156 SM-2ER also falls into this though it’s far closer to the RIM-174 SM-6.
SM-3 is an Exo-atmospheric Ballistic missile interceptor though it’s designation was originally for an “Outer Air Battle Missile”.
SM-4 was able to be illuminated by an aircraft in the “Mountain Top” concept to combat sea-skimmers below the horizon.
SM-5 was the LASM, or land attack standard missile. Basically a RIM-66 without fins that could be dual packed into a MK-41 VLS.
SM-6 is the RIM-174 anti-everything missile we all know and love.
I could be mixing up SM-4 and SM-5 but both were canceled so it doesn’t matter too much.
There are no images of the JATM and I believe it is confirmed to be a single-stage missile (though with a pulsed motor).
That’s an image of the Boeing LRAAM, which is a separate concept.

ah I see
surprised we don't have anything of JATM considering its in the testing phase
and intended to hit IOC by the end of this year
IOC is?
initial operating capability
no tato no now the PLA knows what IOC means

My understanding is it has a boost for really long range then can use its pulsed motor for a high Probability of Kill at the endgame combined with potential divert motors.
It’s not just meant to have a long range but also be able to perform well at those ranges.
oh nooooooooooooooooooooo
I mean you wouldn’t wanna let your enemies know everything that you’re testing
anyway hope your ready for dual loads of AIM-120Ds and AIM-260s

There's no way that the 260 is on schedule with the 120D purchase ramp up and not a peep from even DOT&E on testing
Will notify
260s meant to exceed AIM-120 production by 2026
so I wouldn't be surprised if the AMRAAM production line keeps going as a stopgap

I mean we also didn’t see jack about the B-21 before it was revealed.
We had progress updates regularly.
There's nothing on the JATM.
Not even on aerospace industry scuttlebutt.
There’s also nothing bad about it.
all we know is that its achieved its first test target shootdowns
Congress would be kicking and screaming if it was really behind.

In the history of DoD procurement, limited news + ramp-up of alternatives is not a good sign.
Like bad as in bad for the US or
Congress only kicks and screams if they are fully read into the issues. How do you think the USN got congress to sign off on so many LCSes?
Bad for the U.S.

Fair point
So good for us got it
idk there's two alternative programs with meteor as a fallback option
I won't go into the politics involved, but in the history of procurement it's rarely a good sign and I'd bet money that IOC has slipped at least out of 2023.
JNAAM is better than Meteor.
yeah but that's also still under development
and that's also started development much later than the 260
Both AAM-4B and Meteor are in production.
I'm pretty much not expecting that thing to materialize in service until the 260 or LREW end up doing so
AAM-4 doesn’t offer appreciable advantages over the AMRAAM.
I mean JNAAM does
since it fills that long range class
but AIM-120Ds pretty much gonna be the king of the middle range missiles unless the super R-77s manage to make it out of their own development hell
tho that's only going by hard factors
We don’t know a lot about the actual benchmarks used so hard factors are generally fairly hard to nail down.
Like how is range measured?
Speed of launch aircraft? Speed and attitude of target? PK at that range?
generally people overlook crap like that alongside the US's advantage in datalinks, sensors so on and so on
True. Having 10 missiles is great and all. But if you only have 6 guidance uplinks then it’s not so hot.
Basically for midcourse guidance an Aircraft feeds information to its missiles via a datalink.
Adjustments and the like.
Same applies to SAMs. It’s why I think SPY-6 is pretty important as it almost certainly vastly increases the AEGIS guidance capacity preventing saturation of AEGIS ships.
the ultimate counter to swarm attacks is a SM-6 with a nuclear warhead
Nuclear Standard missile is the way to go.
Laser-guided rods from god
Yes
Lazer guided gods from Rod
How’s the SAL going to get through the plasma sheath?
true fleet defense will come to us from the atom
yea but like
TBF 6 links for 10 missiles is already more than enough. Modern AA missiles are smart enough to only need midcourse guidance at most which can be easily time multiplexed
Fair.
I mean 10-20 nautical miles is fairly far. Superficial damage maybe but nothing serious.
Didn’t we pull off something similar in the 70s?
AEGIS are rated for saturation attack with only 3 uplinks
With one of the Nike missiles
its a variable yield warhead that can go between 5-150 kilotons if we go by the W80 warhead
its not gonna wipe out the fleet if you're flinging it 10+ miles away
With the Sprint missile?
It used radio command guidance from a really powerful transmitter to get through the sheath.
Ah, gotcha
I’m pretty sure each SPY-1 panel can manage 6-8 uplinks when it’s in missile guidance mode.

You can theoretically pick nonatmospheric spectrum and scan it with noise-ignoring method like lock-in-amp or something
It's quite solved tech since 80s
Around 10 micrometers? You know, the thermal infrared area.
Because reentry vehicles are known for not heating up.
thermal heating would be broadband
Sure, but you need that laser designator to be pretty beefy to overcome the thermal IR because that thing is damn hot.
At that point you’re better off just zapping the target with the laser.
SPY-1 doesn't illuminate or datalink.
It doesn’t illuminate but it does datalink.
Standard missiles have an S-band datalink.
You need at least a C or X band radar for illumination.
I thought the datalinks were provided from a different transmitter. But for terminal guidance you have to have the good 'ole SPG-62
It dont need to be beefy, just need to be distinguishable
The technology is pretty much the same with how we can still discriminate signal from GPS down to -153 dBm when background system noise is -110 dBm!
imagine getting signal 43 dB down from noise baseline
There is a separate datalink assembly IIRC but the SPY-1 can operate in missile guidance mode to have more birds in the air.
Interesting. TIL.
TIL what IOC meant
The bottleneck on terminal illumination is why many of the Standard Missiles are being upgraded to Active Radar versions.
speaking in general
Is it bad having one single state owned company making all the equipment for a branch for the military
There's also the MHIP seeker on late SM-2s.
But yes, that bottleneck has long been an issue.
IIRC this was more to combat jamming by Soviet ASMs.
They’d bounce jamming signals off the water so you couldn’t just home-on-jam.
Generally yes.
Or at least that was a concern.

It more depends on how it’s run and the environment and work culture around it.
Norinco
defense consolidation is a real issue
when it comes to American procurement
with less and less companies competing and more and more companies becoming more vertically integrated

"Since the 1990s, the defense sector has consolidated substantially, transitioning from 51 to 5 aerospace and defense prime contractors," the report states. "As a result, DOD is increasingly reliant on a small number of contractors for critical defense capabilities."
Over the last 30 years, the report continues, the number of suppliers for things such as tactical missiles, fixed-wing aircraft, and satellites have all declined dramatically. For instance, 90% of missiles now come from just three sources, the report says. "
Didn’t realize until recently Leonardo’s also the one providing MSDs for the army
Leonardo is like
We need to have regular ass manufacturing companies whipping out units
Call Yamaha
everything at this point
Have them start making F-35s
man
I have no fucking idea how the fuck every instrument company managed to let Yamaha out do them
Skill issue i guess
Gibson can't even make a guitar that doesn't want to destroy itself slowly and Yamaha just shits out high quality instruments left and right for actually decent prices
(anyway enough of that)
generally we need to foster something equivalent to what Israel has where there's multiple defense start ups competing with the major companies
so what you're saying is that
the US should encourage companies to compete with the big shits like lockheed and Raython
yes
Problem is all the startups get absorbed
Aermacchi? under Leonardo
Otomelara? Under Leonardo
Agusta/Agustawestland? Leonardo
Selex? Leonardo
Wass? leonardo
Who owns part of MBDA (25%), Panavia (15%), Eurofighter group (21%), Thales Alenia (33%) and god knows how many other companies? you guessed it, also Leonardo
The way congress award contracts is inherently leading to few large "contractor" with huge amount of "suppliers" behind it
Case in point, look at Boeing Commercial Aircraft and who made each sections of their aircrafts
the only other big companies are Iveco, which is partnered with Leonardo, specifically with Oto melara, to build the italian ground vehicles
and Fincantieri, which builds ships
...which also use Leonardo systems
so yeah
Can't the government make a law prohibing that
the recent procurement talks are also partly aimed at making Leonardo move their asses
with talks of Lynx/CV90s and Leo 2A7s/MGCS

Tbf that's probably still ends up a pork barrel again
Italian CV-90s and Lynxs
i hate the 40mm in WT so i dont want the CV90 irl /s
spalling of Russian tanks will forever curse us
40mm need a new cartridge smh
Best reason to choose a design.
truly
Gn yall bye
the public extent of the design that has to fight the CV90 and Lynx for procurement is
a shitty 3d render
Isn’t the 50mm a necked-up 35mm?
that's the older one
The XM913 is an experimental American chain gun produced at Picatinny Arsenal. The cannon is a larger and more modern version of the 25 mm Bushmaster cannon. Although its shells, 50 x 228 mm, are twice the diameter of the 25×137mm M242 Bushmaster, the 50mm cannon is not much longer than the smaller weapon. The overall lengths of the 25mm cannon ...
50x228mm versus 35x228mm
The Bushmaster III is a 35 mm automatic/semi-automatic cannon designed and built by Alliant Techsystems, based on the 25 mm M242 Bushmaster. The weapon has been selected as primary armament for the CV9035 export versions of the CV90 infantry fighting vehicles (IFV) currently in service with the Danish, Dutch and Estonian armies. The Bushmaster I...
Centauro 2 when
I could be msistaken

but I swore the Bushmaster III 50 MM and the XM913 were different
I think they use the same shell but have different mechanisms.
Huh, what I remember was that SuperShot 50 is not 50x228
same
how old even is the cv90
I was seeing ads for it when I was paging through the 90s issues of Jane's
mk 0 is 93
Vaguely remember SS50 being semi telescoped full length cartridge
Pure sex
I'm still waiting for the entire another round of OMFV trials just for it to come to the same conclusion again
the consequences of reagan
TFW his term was 40 years ago but i could probably still get warned for politics by calling him a godless whore
I mean I got warned for saying a certain communist country and the soviets would of been capable of industrialization and mass literacy without a massive famine
Don’t insult Godless whores like that.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1RHPLeX5jJMzsoex3iyPGqvcjf9-H2rdULLJs1Xvw5Kg/edit?usp=sharing
hi here's a spreadsheet detailing everyone that was at the battle of okinawa and if they're in the game or not
USN
DD,CL,CA/CB,BB,CV
Subtype,Class,Name,Subtype,Class,Name,Subtype,Class,Name,Subtype,Class,Name,Subtype,Class,Name
In Game As Of Apr. 2023
DD,Fletcher,Stanly,CL,Brooklyn,St. Louis,CA,Pensacola,Pensacola,BB,Nevada,Nevada,CV,Yorktown,Enterprise
DD,Fletcher,Bache,CL,Atlanta,San Diego,CA,Pensacola...
bye
and 
If you see a picture of a bismarck class taken directly from above, it's probably neetpitz
Not quite. Bismarck was also photographed above Norway.
Can we get much higher?
kharkov out here adding full on barbettes to their SPAAs
bottom text
Huh
I just realised
B-2s are still grounded since December 2022 right
Since that crash
An utterly tragic mistake that was made worse by the escorts machine gunning survivours
As a result none of the prisoners survived
Rabaul was a fucking massacre
Caused by a near treasonous faith in British defence policy and the previous government being completely subservient to British interests
Funny J-15

when was the IJN Akagi launched?
the WW2 One?
Ja
Huh its her launch day today
bruh lol
Question:wat gift should i give?
no idea
Can you afford it
I advice 55 year Yamazaki whisky

Considering the size of the Aussie tank fleet that’s more than enough to equip their single armored brigade
tanks and IFVs are operated by 1st armoured, 2nd cavalry and 2nd/14th Light Horse
the remainder operate a mix of ASLAVs, Bushmasters and M113s
10th light horse is using Hawkei, 3rd/9th light horse is using bushmasters, 3rd/4th cavalry is using various stuff, mainly because theyre a training school, 12th/16th uses bushmasters, 4th/19th light horse also uses bushmasters too
nothing that isnt on Wikipedia, you're also a massive LARPer so i dont really give a fuck

i actually have a competent enough understanding of OPSEC to not be posting classified information in public discord servers
Who said I was gonna leak anything
like i give a fuck about you
i give a fuck about the dozen ASIO officers who just clicked into this channel the moment someone said the word classified
hi guys
Your credit card information.
you know my credit card information? bro so do I, you're not special
I…
I was referring to this part

To be fair, Wikipedia doesn’t do a great job at explaining things and it’s usually far from exhaustive.
i was using Armys website too
and i dont need to be exhaustive
i just need to say whose using what
in a very basic manner
if i wanted to go in depth about Armys organisation i'd be digging out the pdf folder
but im very tired
Damn y’all got a PDF folder of this stuff
i have pdfs of everything
I have my “homework” folder
Christ I probably have $10,000 of Janes and Friedman pdf rips.
As IBCS enters full-rate production, this year and next year will be crucial for the Army's Enduring Shield launcher. The Dynetics-produced system is the launcher component of the Army's Indirect Fires Protection Increment 2 system and will begin early testing live demo next year
126
you're under arrest for copyright violation

be a pal and pass them on
So like y’all just go a entire folder of shit y’all specialize in
I have uhhhhh
A site that isn’t pdfdrive.com certainly doesn’t have them.
i have a folder of stuff that interests me
assorted military balances from several different decades back when I was stupid enough to do nation sims
Same

i forget about pdf
I need me one of those
pdf is in collection, unread
I need to get all of the shit on my laptop onto my desktop now that I have the like 5+ TBs of SSD storage space
and all but one contains shattered sword because you never know when you might need it
and lots of fitzsimmons novels
he may not be the best historian and has an obvious pro-Australian nationalistic bias
but hes a very engaging writer

its ok I have a raging pro Australian bias as well
based but i guarantee you arent a frontrunner of the republican movement
nor married to one of Australias most famous media personalities/journalists
Minnesotan infiltration of the Australian upper classes
you will be shot
you cannot inflict more pain than working for Fed Ex has on me
Y’all just throw the packages anyways
probably my favourite extract from one of his novels
I don't respect you or your damn packages
my acc is frozen

Skill issue
unfortunately was not able to find that epitah myself, however i only spent a day on the peninsular so I wasnt able to visit all of the war graves or battlefields
I read most of the gravestones at Lone Pine, if I had to guess he misremembered or something or the stone was changed
thinking about it I haven't felt more malice in my life than that time I saw someone who covered their package with "please don't break my package Fedex" stickers
sadist
Very based
What the service sector does to a MF.
I understand why my packages get broke
eh least I'm not the one delivering the damn things
i pour beers with either too much head or completely flat when people are assholes to me
because im a cunt
We know
reasonable
As you should.
and i make sure to pour those wines spot on the line and enjoy their complaints when i didnt pour it over the line
want me to overpour your vodka? you better be hot or it aint happening
wonder if we'll finally get that Minnesota Nordic cross
https://www.twincities.com/2023/04/18/minnesota-house-passes-government-elections-bill-that-calls-for-redesigning-state-flag-and-seal/
Only if you start performing coastal raids on Michigan.
need Australian state flag redesigns but it wont happen until 2026 at a minimum
sadly
I'll compromise and agree to raid Wisconsin
You have a bargain.
But why
What do the current flags look like
Nevermind I see why
da jack wit da cross and da crown
the most politically influential states in Australia
and godawful flag design

at least WA has something interesting on it...
I meant to say state
and they arent getting changed until we're a republic
So
like 50% of US state flags are just this
2026?
blue background with the fucking state seal on it
the worst part is all of the states have interesting alternative designs but NO ONE HAS FUCKING ADOPTED THEM
Deep blue better
at the earliest assuming the ALP wins in 2025
Tasmania
which they will
Niceee
Just put a kangaroo on it
you know what one of the most recognisable tasmanian animals is
the Tasmanian FUCKING TIGER
Tasmanian tiger?
Ain’t that shit extinct
yes
I mean they killed them all.
but it wasnt when they designed the flag
Heh, at least it wasn't a heraldic lion
and QLD is just the Victoria and NSW combined because QLD is irrelevant and can't do anything original
and no one cares about SA
but like, Norfolk Island and the NT both have such amazing flags so why didnt the rest of the country do it
Boring politicans
even the cocos islands have an interesting flag
like its objectively a bad design, but far better than any state flag
Islamic Australia
the islands are right next to Indonesia so
Dar Al Austral
inshallah









