#history
1 messages · Page 89 of 1
Some, I noticed are likely from Navweaps, like metacentric height and stability
And wasn't most of what was Austria-Hungary not even Austrian nor Hungarian?
Radar, beaten to death
yup
nationalism is a powerful force
it is what united germany
and what destabilized autria-hungary
And I still dont exactly understand the "cabling outside citadel" argument to this day
And these duchies, kingdoms and such in fmr HRE see themselves all as "German," no?
Like, if you argue the Littorios were crappy because the diesel generators were outside the citadel, sure
Cabling, though...what ship doesnt have cabling out of its citadel?
well, they had a united german culture
you could say that
I see where this is going
idk
That list, besides one or two points, is either false, semi-correct (technical part is true, but it didn't cause the issues described) or a case of [citation needed]
im not familiar with hre and how the german states saw each other
im still reading stuff about that
so if you try to balkanize a region where the culture is all pretty similar
what's to stop it from re unifying

Like I never heard credible sources describing vibration issues
probably trying to find who would get to lead the states
also weren't the german wars of unification just 60-70 years prior
fighting over who gets to rule over the others
Like
Just over 50
ie relatively recent in cultural memory
And Im more curious how the centreline shaft affects buoyancy
unification happened in like 1870 or something
1871
Or the no override stuff, not exactly sure where the source is , or how badly it affects the ship
bro edited a telegram and started a war
yeah so I doubt dividing up germany would've done much
given the people would still remember fighting to unite just a few decades prior
Also wouldn't some states just have
No industrial base
To speak of
Since
Most of it
Is in
what would stop them from fighting eachother on which state gets to rule over the others
The ruhr?
culture?
remember pan-arabism?
they all agreed on a united arab world but cant decide on who gets to lead
my guy
then it all fell apart
you do understand there's a difference between
But wouldn't Prussia
a bunch of theoretical small states that had been united, then forcibly separated
and
"why won't the middle east unite"
fair enough
Again?
Austria and Prussia were really the only ones with any huge amount of power
Is kinda false anyway, survivors stated that they did manage to decouple the rudder (likely just one), and somewhat countersteered with the propulsion
like if you're gonna compare it to pan arabism
the arab world's history is just war after war against one another
religious conflicts, territorial conflicts
But with trimming being all over due to the fourth or fifth breech of the hull now, and the poor weather, it only sufficed for ~8kn against the weather
and so did the german states back then
a bunch of small states who until 15 minutes ago had been united
Muhammed did United Arabs best as he can tho tbh
but we're not talking about europe overall
neighbouring german states were fighting eachother too
bavaria and brandenburg-prussia
The Arabs can rally against a common enemy
But
They don't really
Seem
To hold after
They defeat that enemy
Israel would be main focus
Germany was able to stay
my point is that's a shitty comparison to make
So maybe instability actually helps them alot 
because it's far easier to take states that had previously been together and get them to unite again
than it is to bring peace to the middle east
That's what my dad believes. They're so busy tangled with each other that they make themselves easier enemies
unless you're soviet of course
What about the AA? You cant deny about the 37mm being a bit of a meme though.
Rome 
where your former territories aren't gonna want to go back to that abusive relationship
Also
Former areas of the German Empire
Are pretty
Well
Industrialized
Like in Poland today
When that part was under German control, a lot of industrialization and mechanization was established
i like how wilhelm 1 styled himself as the german emperor instead of the emperor of germany so that it would not sound like he's ruling over the other kings and their superior

Do cultures unite people or Conqueror
we can all agree something about the little german states unifying
cartographers breathed a sigh of relief when that happened

I say Conqueror
conqueror
US Civil War is good example if you ask me
Conf states want to seperate, attacks Fort Sumter
Union brings the weapons to prevent it
Now those states are together for a long while
"United" thanks to Union's decision of war
Thus Conqueror unites people AND keeps them together
Yea
Since as Japan says
“The nail that sticks out gets hammered down”
Where are you from
Nobody knows really
that's not really how the ACW worked but I'm not exactly an expert on the topic myself
I'm a guy who likes to listen to what people say
I mean you can say Confederacy started everything with them seizing US forts within their borders
But Union was willing to fight against separation
separation for what purpose
this is a conversation between two individuals who are wholly unqualified to discuss the topic
by extension nothing can realistically be gained from it
Call in those CSS Alabama fans, I'm sure they have great opinion on the matter 
boat
HMAS Yarra btw
It's so easy to think the Leanders/Rivers were so much bigger than they actually were
shame we never kept one of the rivers as a museum they put a lot of good service in
kept Vampire tho
and 2 of them are dive wrecks
HMAS Stuart in HK
showing off her Ikara
also the sinking of Torrens is used by foreign propagandists on a rather comedically regular basis
NK, Hezbollah, etc
Hezbollah actually claimed they'd sunk an Israeli ship using the footage
Nugget and Kaoshiung Middleschoolers 
Won't deny the state of the 37mm beyond "could still be worse" and "better than nothing", but the talk about the 105mm is false (was still well fast enough to track aircraft at ranges that one would fire at), and 15cm AA talk is more of a meme than 37mm C30 AA talk
Though I do feel obliged to state that all BB AA in early 1941 sucked ass
To the topic of culture and the ACW. Yes the Union won the war but the South fought hard after to keep their culture alive. Even to the point that Hollywood in its early days was painting the South as a noble force. Watch a lot of the old cowboy movies it usually has a former southerner fighting against either still in or was in the Union corrupt and only wanting money while the Southerner is just doing what he can to live a simple life. So was the South culture conquered?
The NorCals were still running around with 50cal machine guns at that time, and would not get 20mm weapons until ~ a year later
the sons and daughters of the confederacy have worked tirelessly to ensure that the South and its ideas of the war can survive
Don't remind me of RN AA...
the lost cause myth isnt going away any time soon
HACS
Ah Birth of a Nation movie yeah
Queen Bee drone above the entire Mediterranean Fleet for one fucking hour with nothing stopping it
Man I hated watching that movie.

Was our first movie for my America in Film class.
And caused a lot of change in the US. KKK back and accepted by the masses.
It's a little surprising at times that the US hasn't had a 2nd Civil War. The US is so divided on many issues and yet it still works.
Tempting the devil? 
Could be. I do wonder how the late 2010s and early 2020s will be recorded in history.
RN AA, aka, we can't be bothered to use fire control, let's recommend tracer rounds for the heavy AA and then Mk1 eyeball it
Please don't tempt fate like that
the end of the post cold war period
in terms of dividing history into periods, I always find it interesting that the 90s are in this awkward, in-between spot
cold war ends in '91 and the gwot starts in '01
in between you have somalia, kosovo
INTERFET:
My early childhood. It's this time where the world seemed safe. The fear of war was over. We were on the fast track of advancing as a society as technology was exploding into everyday life.
can't say I relate
early 2000s kid
I don't think any of us realized how little time separated the end of the cold war and our birth
Best times to live was 1960-70s
hell I was born 2002
I'm a 92 child.
I only remember 2000s as pretty hard time
the gwot was already underway by the time I came along
Ok maybe not
mmm asbestos
it was just something we accepted as a fact of life
Not a a best time for Vietnamese that one
I remember still when 9/11 happened. Was sitting in class and the teacher turned on the TV. Saw a tower on fire. Then another tower with a fireball coming out of it later on.
personally I grew up with images of Afghanistan and constant fearmongering of South East Asian immigration
the GFC, terror threats, etc
what I always find interesting is
the textbooks and curriculum of our history classes barely pushes into the 90s
you hit the end of the cold war and then it talks about globalization and technology
The 90s is wild, I tell you that
our text books ended at like... WW2 or early Cold War
Good thing about USSR fall is that the hardline Vietnamese communist get their power challenge and make way for reformer
but it must have been just recent enough that new books had yet to be published
or they had but the school board didn't think it was important enough to replace
tbf I was going through early high school during the whole 100 years since WW1 thing and basically the whole country was caught up in it so a solid year of high school history was just WW1
then i had a year of WW2
tbf, how do you teach about the balkan in the 90s, it so chaotic that it nearly impossible to make a coherent text
and I dont even remember what the other year was
It depends. The education system has to deem it worth adding in. Which wars and conflicts does seem to be more removed from k-12 schools. Be still talk about the main ones but the little ones they won't.
it's always interesting though
My history class was repeat 3 time for 3 levels, it teach the same thing, just more detail overtime
growing up it always felt like most conflicts were behind us
I remember doing ancient China in primary school tho
Francis Fukuyama:
then you realize the soviets fell only 11 years before you were born
If I recall for school was like up to 5th grade be a mixture of home state and US history. 6th was world history. 7&8th US. 9/10 world. 11th US.
ayyy good old 02
and that 4 years before you were born your dad was in kosovo
and a year after you're born your country's troops were rolling into iraq
What was the longest "peace" period of US?
I remember waiting for Iraq to happen. Had that one space shuttle disaster beforehand so when the TV went to breaking news for that we thought it was war with Iraq.
I was born mere months before the Bali bombings
so a good chunk of my childhood was all about that
Bombings & mass shootings was a lot of my 2000s I recall.
Ah early 1800s
there's been about 15-20 years total in US history when we haven't been at war
Yeah greens are no war
usually because we're involved in multiple that overlap
the revolution, the indian wars
Bali was something else
We've always had an idea of national invulnerability probably to an even greater degree than the US
Yes, America being the War Hawk of the world since 1776 
only once in our history has a foreign enemy actually attacked mainland Australia
so when Bali happened it kind of brought the war on terror all that much closer to home
my favorite US war has to be the second barbary war
It's crazy how fast that sense of safety could be gone.
which lasted 3 days
Meanwhile France. Since 1337, there were 174 years without a single war where France was involved.
since it was clear that this wasn't just a far away conflict for Americans and everyone else to deal with

We just took over France's job there mostly
and then basically nothing happened until 2014
but there was a lot of racism so yknow
good times i guess
"so you're an american? name every war"
Mexico next 
Indian Wars. That covers most of them.
Ironic that hardest battle US ever fought was the Civil war
Having most deaths to it
I mean you count both sides so easier to do.
yeah the civil war was a boiling over the slavery debate
Wikipedias judgement of what counts as a war is a little dodgy truth be told
since on the Australian page it lists the Berlin Airlift as a war
the founding fathers hadn't really been explicit about slavery in the US
About 2% of the US population gone in 4 years.
since they needed states to actually ratify the constitution
This was the peaceful war plan but Lincoln didn't choose to fully follow some reason. Only blocked the shipping routes
they'd assumed slavery as an institution wouldn't survive much longer but then along comes eli whitney
And the culture that slave owners had. Owning a slave was status.
I mean it was the cotton gin that made the practice actually economically viable
Union blocking cotton trade was a big blow to their economy
the gov isn't able to rule one way or the other so they kept kicking the can further down the road with the missouri compromise and kansas-nebraska act
kansas-nebraska act ends up causing more political turmoil
The South had nothing else really on the foreign market to offer aside from cotton. Which while the war was happening Egypt and India had booms as their main rival was gone.
finally lincoln gets elected
Ah the burning of Kansas.
South had no Industry for things like navy as well. So they tried to buy ships from Royal Navy but British seeing Union winning didn't allowed to not ruin relationships
with the british it was also
they didn't want to be seen as supporting the slavery side of the war
The South was mostly just a Plantation type of economy since most of the industrial setup was in the Northern States at that time
they'd abolished slavery in the 1830s
They got what CSS Alabama and another from the UK? And that was it.
I mean some folks tout the whole "states rights" line
and I guess to some extent they're not incorrect
as you can form a historical narrative
The Civil War did cause West Virginia to become its own State from it
but that wasn't the reason why the war was launched
I'm talking about the ship 
it did however see a shift in how the country was run
Also, back then it was more States First, and Country Second
"These United States" became "The United States"
Virginia and Monitor fought for 3 hours without sinking each other
so in a sense, if you're writing a book you could make a point that the period had an underlying theme of states v federal gov
but to say that's what the war was about is dishonest at best
Chad sloped armor vs chad turret
I feel like it was either poor aimming, or then using the wrong kind of ammo against their hull type
the "right" kind of ammo didn't exist yet
During this era
Hits are very hard to get
Reload takes minutes
Penetration is trash
They hit each other alot.
you were still throwing cannonballs at one another
And it would just be like a minor dent or something in the hull right?
Practically
when was the first shell gun invented
Reminded of this now
Wow, is that the Monitor?
@spring briar
Yup
Both ships also got a lot of angles so it was hard actually get it to soild hit on each other to not bounce.
Hey Krem, I give you steampunk US navy
1820s? it looks like
Based
Have you heard of our good friend USS Wolverine?
first adopted by the french in the 1840s
Dystopian war game
Paddle boat CV.

USS Vesuvius, the third ship of the United States Navy named for the Italian volcano, was a unique vessel in the Navy inventory which marked a departure from more conventional forms of main battery armament. She is considered a dynamite gun cruiser and was essentially an operational testbed for large dynamite guns.
It's not Scythe is it?
No
Wish they kept one of those around. Be so cool to see.
first breech-loading, rifled naval gun was 1850s-60s
The Paixhans gun (French: Canon Paixhans, French pronunciation: [pɛksɑ̃]) was the first naval gun designed to fire explosive shells. It was developed by the French general Henri-Joseph Paixhans in 1822–1823. The design furthered the evolution of naval artillery into the modern age. Its use presaged the end of wood as the preferred material in n...
A couple wooden ship of the lines were used as targets against the 22cm Canon-obusiers invented by Paixhans in 1824
Wait what?
The ships did not fare well.
Uss Wolverine
There is aso USS Sable.
wolverine was a steamer on the great lakes
the navy bought her and gave her a flattop to train pilots
Runways was shorter than the escort CVs navy figured if pilots can fly off of them then they'll be good everywhere else.
Oh, training ship
Also Krem, "USSR" steampunk carrier task force
It came out about 5 years after the ship.
I don't know why but I just love the steampunk-esque design
Nah I'm speaking about the Montana and Midway's /54
Midway use single Montana would used twin
ironic since they, off of paper, did for cheap economics, the 1833 british law also ended slavery over time, not abolishing it, for example slavery was still legal in british india after that
though for kremlin's credit, one of the nations that supported the union the most was russia
weight most likely, ships like montana and midway are very large and the weight mattered little
Calculation was shit I forgot alot but
6 5/38 weights much as 4 5/54
What make /38 great was actually its weight if you ask me
Which also makes traverse easier
yeah, it was a very sweet spot, you could make it more powerful for either aa or surface, but it sacrifices
Dats a flat lookin deck
One can say "unification", another "Prussia establishing their dominance over the Germanosphere"
(It was called Prussia rather than Germany not without a reason)
And specifically because it was only less than 50 years prior, and also internally there were still administrative separations based on some of the previous duchies/states/entities
(only during Hitler did the last of those were actually removed)
There could be still a chunk of older nobility and leaders that would know of the time before Prussian overlordship
And there is hundreds of years of "Germany" functioning as not-Holy not-Roman not-Empire loose federation
They have more history as autonomic smaller political entities than as a singular country at that point in history
And for Prussian re-establishing dominance, part of their rise to power that put them in position to expand their control over the western German states was 1. Getting a significant part of Poland during Dissolutions 2. Getting Upper Silesia from Austria in a war.
And after WW1 they would lose both
They would probably still retain their major position they worked for for the past 2 centuries, but I just think it is not as cut and dry and re-germanising german lands isn't totally improbably for the times
which was the true best IJN ship?
there's people that fanboy over Yamato
oh yeah, by the way, the Yamato and Shokaku class were actually part of the same ship construction programme of somesorts
anyways
what I think the true best IJN was, is Zuikaku
one of the best service histories I've read through
Are you sure it isn’t just you simping for her?
This guy speaks like AI
Yes.
I say Haruna was best for IJN
Haruna fought in almost every major naval action of the Pacific Theater during World War II.
Very experienced and useful

I say "best IJN ship"
Kaga was slow
Soryuu and Hiryuu were, small compared to the Shokaku class
Akagi is uhhhh
Yukikaze and Shigure, for sinking every ship she escorted 
in a nutshell, I like the Shokaku class
Great contributor to the war effort
fast and big
34 knots for an aircraft carrier quite crazy
the average is around 30 knots
Not really. The Essexs were capable of hitting this high speed as well.
some 28 knots
yeah, the essex class were marvels aswell
Kaga was the slowest of the entire Kido Butai. The only merit she has going is plane capacity.
Everything else about her is very no.
Most carriers are absurdly tall.
yeah true
By virtue of a two storied hangar.
Unless you are Shinano, who is so far into the construction that adding a two storied hangar will just make her die.
What would you like to know?
I heard.
Personally, ignoring all the concerning stuff they've done, I personally like the smaller ships these days - the true overworked bunch of the navy.
Being expandable makes them most effective
Capitals can only do so much if your logistics and its escorts commit harakiri
The Ises are the ones I love to mock about
Ah yes, Aviation battleship? Right. No planes for you. Now shut the fuck up and carry as much oil as you can from the SEA back to Japan like a glorified oil tanker you are.
Fusou has the issue of literally the first homemade dreadnoughts with very little deck space
Ise just kinda fucks it up even harder with crew accomodation
Japanese ships in general were rather poor on accomodation iirc
IJN just displays yamato to scare the US,failed by helldivers
Sang, spartan, sure, but not inhospitable or extremely cramped level bad
except a few
"For financial reasons more powerful engines could not be ordered so the new design was lengthened slightly and the boiler rooms enlarged to increase speed by 0.5 knots (0.93 km/h; 0.58 mph) to 23 knots (43 km/h; 26 mph). To save weight the forecastle deck was shortened so that the lower midships gun turret was lower than in the Fusō class. This reduced the crew's accommodations despite a significant increase in the crew's numbers and naval historian Fukui Shizuo believed that these ships had the worst habitability of any Japanese capital ship."
You know it's bad when Kaga's fucking 40 degree celsius crew space doesn't get to be the #1 in Fukui's list
Or Jun'you's "no tables, bring your own mat to dinner lol" fireproofing rules 
Wrong
Yamato is kept secret from US long as possible
US didn't even know she had 460mms
Hmm she was found heading to Okinawa right?
For defense of Okinawa yes
Compared to the Dutch the amenities are terrible though. Not to mention the lack of tropical suitability.
Dutch liked comfort I guess
Well, like I said, spartan
was Missouri perhaps,in Okinawa?
They had rough estimates by 1944-1945.
Turns out if your crew is healthy and energetic they perform better 
health and comfort? Ew, filthy western imperialist
Just beat your crew harder for every minor infraction they did, not like they can blow up your ship or commit atrocities or anything!
Flogging continues untill morale improves.
120 lashes for you
....That said, the officer quarters of Yamato are well known to be comfortable, and Nugget's mess is....alright, I guess?
Welcome to The IJN Yamato hotel
IJN copy RN draconian discipline but miss out on the humanitarian part afterwards
Can someone direct me to the website that has these crisp drawings of US ships?
Crispy critters
Wat dat ship?
North Carolina
didn't recognize the bow

How crisp do you want? I have an entire folder full of several US ships.
If you are curious what's inside the ship, you can also see it right there.
Enough details to make a man bust a nut.
oh fuck, I forgot to add Helena's into it
Mmm
I specifically want those of this style
If it's not too much of a favour too, preferably DM me, if there are any, of other major navies too (KMS, IJN, RN, RM, MN)
Also, Haida's booklet of general plans, if anyone is interested.
sorry for ping.
Thanks 👍
Don't mind the ping (oh and I appreciate the booklet collections, they're a god send)
If you really need a certain fixed style
then I suggest finding Conway's 1922-1946 All the World's Fighting Ships
standardized to a T.

Just finished WW1 
Kinda sad ngl
Though I did like how Franz Ferdinand knew that the Serbia hated him and he still decided to visit
Not the smartest idea but hey it's whatever he wanted I wonder how different things would be if he didn't die and still was the leader of Austria
Looks like Jane's
Jane's a bit more shagged - was thinking ONI.
Neither of which are credible with the knowledge of hindsight.
The kriegsmarine has a ton of paper plans for ships
It's all die-joubu
Bruh why does it look like a Japanese toy product description
Prob keep the empire alive for few more decades, the Balkn still gonna be a mess though but unless something too drastic happen like after his death then Russia don’t have much reason to declare war and drag their allies into war with them.
On that alternate history note, brit and german naval arm race prob still gonna happen regardless but they prob will reach something like the London naval treaty after realize how costly the race is becoming
I dunno maybe the black hand would still try to get him
None, they all sunk
Define best.
Akagi's torpedo squadron was excellent, and so was the 2nd CarDiv's dive bombing squadrons.
Them together as a cohesive unit was why the force was destructive.
true, it does depend on your stand point
Probably, they still will do assassination to the Austrian higher up but with the right policy then the extremist cause will alienate the public at large
I'd say Akagi and Kaga were the best in terms of air superiority, they were the original after all
Most English pulbications I've seen credit Hiryu with the destruction of Arizona, but others credit a pilot on Soryu instead.
though, I'd say the Shokaku and Zuikaku were the best in terms of design
Zuikaku probably had most, interesting service history of them all
the Shokaku class was much superior to Akagi and Kaga imo
...Two were literally built from the keel up as carriers
in terms of design that is.
the other two are conversions from existing hulls
indeed
Of course the one designed from the keels up are better.
though, the 1st carrrier division had better pilots
The four earlier carriers had enough time and space to train while operating off the Chinese coast.
Even then, their initial operations were not that impressive until later stages.
also, what would the war have been like if Shinano and Taiho were both actually reliable?
Zuikek had a couple workers die inside her due to toxic and dark working conditions, and nearly drowned from a typhoon, if you want interesting tidbits.
what if Zuikaku had managed to successfully sink enterprise?
Taiho maybe but shinano was a bad investment from the start
Irrelevant. Taihou's air group got chewed up anyway
horrible damage control
By 1944, the aviators of the IJN are simply not going to stand up against the US counterparts.
Tbf, new and untrained crew
Shinano is debatable. You have a 50% complete hull sitting at your dock.
You can either convert it, or take it apart for scrap metal.
The former route is faster.
Scrap it to make more AT gun
Hull No.111/Kii, however, was a braindead choice. 30% complete.
Scrap it, use it to feed the Unryus.
guys wats the best rations
Russian mountain MRE
Overated
and I'd argue that poor damage control was the second poor decision that sealed Taihou's fate
in the haste to launch the second attack squadron, the commander ordered the broken elevator deck be sealed up with whatever materials are available on hand, while avgas is spreading throughout the ship.
Depend, I like the Pate and my pallet is relatively similar to russian anyway
design kinda flawed and is a termite
They did exactly that, and you have the fans running at full speed spreading the gas everywhere.
doesn't seem like a smart decision to me
Likely not, tbh. The Germans actually gave up on trying to match the British before WWI, because it became clear to them that British construction was going to keep outstripping them by a significant margin.
it's because Russian mre ain't thesame
In hindsight, sure.
If you want to create a massive air attack to oversaturate enemy defenses, then a second attack squadron underway as soon as possible would be ideal.
I like US MRE somewhat more but I can’t stand their vegan menu
Seriously though, what with US MRE and burito, and gulasch as well
If you want to play blame games, then perhaps the first place should be given to poor ASW of the Japanese and allowing Taihou to be hit in the first place.
Yikes,il go peel some potatoes instead
or, if you're more a tinfoil hat conspirist, blame it on the poor welding of the avgas tanks of Taihou, which the chief designer himself admitted may be a possibility during a lecture at MIT.
Beat Chinese MRE anyway, a bit too bland
As for Shinano, she was not even complete when she was sunk.
Nor was she your average standard fleet carrier. Like many said here before, the concept of her is a "floating airbase" - something more akin to HMS Unicorn.
Does shinano can even work as a fleet carrier, she is just a glorify aircraft transport
she could carry ~120 unassembled plane kits, but with only 47 planes ready to go.
Granted, she could assemble them on the spot, but that's not her main thing.
Pretty small air group for her tonage
She also carried aviation armament in her barbettes - those were not removed.
ahh don't start with dat rice;-;
Well yea, like I said, 50% complete, up to the main deck, I believe
Rice is fine, it is army standard
with the war rapidly deteriorating, no time to do any kind of extensive work
just glue a single-storey hangar and a massive fuck off flight deck on it, it'll be fine
send her to the frontlines ASAP
then Yukikaze kills her
Man, IJN and their inefficient system
I don't think efficiency has anything to do here
Midway was quite a blow that the Japanese sought to recover from hard
Didn’t shinano was hastily convert after midway
I'd say resources
and midway
And even if they have carriers/planes, they simply don't have the men
three nearly completely Unryus were shoved into reserve because there are no aviators to crew them
And it circle back to their pilot program
Fucking with the US long term is just not going to work
the 5th carrier division had Good ships, but less experienced crew.
not especially when the US basically shits on your entire merchant navy as well
doubly so when they finally unfucked the Mark 14
IMO, what fucking them up the most is IJN tendency to drawn up complicated plan and their rigid adhere to doctrine
Tbh I like how Germany does all this cool regain stuff and Russia is just sitting in the chair doing nothing
They did have they're problems but weren't hit
tfw you want a kantai kessen
"Ok, here's Midway"
"I said the REAL kantai kessen"
"Ok, here's Phillippines Sea"
"Really?"
"Yea, here's Leyte too."
Kantai is kinda mid
Great Depression hit Weimar hard, USSR at the time was so cut off from international trade that the crash doesn’t matter much to them anyway
Lore wise
This is partly due to Tsushima.
Yeah lol
An exhausted enemy moving into positions easily predictable and interceptable.
We got our great success that way, so it shall work for all of our upcoming battles.
HEY WTH
Mahan advocates for decisive battle to control the sea, IJN think they just need to win one great battle to force US into talk
Well, the decisive battle was expected to break enemy morale and convince the enemy that further conflict is ineffective and should not be done.
Slight issue: The US wants the emperor hanged after they did the funni at Pearl Harbor.
oops.
Which work for the Czar bc it was his private war but dif when you anger the entire nation
Don't want to lose, don't bomb pearl harbor.
Hey no spoilers
I'm not there yet silver

We're barley learning how it was resolved
Should have hang the entire royal family, fucking McArthur
goodnight history Fam!
no, hang McCunter first
Man's incompetence was crucial in the rapid falls of the Philippines
Basically being unreachable when command was needed from him
Reeeeee
Read about him blame the USN detachment when they literally fought tooth and nail to the sea, bloody cunt
Then draw and quarter him for his treatment towards PoW
"I will delay the rescue of PoWs because I have a massive ego and I want all the media attention of the surrender ceremony"
die.
At least Halsey was competent
By marginal luck imo
Samar could have gone very very wrong
and his little Typhoon accident
Halsey greatest sin will away be Taffy 3
Don't worry, it's just a storm
Wait, it's a typhoon
oh fuck 3 DDs capsized
RIP Spence
Patton has that Biscari thing and slapping for me, certainly not a fan of him for me
On the contrary, perhaps we should talk about some praiseworthy ones, but I don't have any on mind right now.
Langsdorf on Spee IIRC was a good fellow, but I don't know him much other than sparing the crew of any further bloodshed at River Plate, and actually following prize rules.
more Sirene's territory.
I think Teddy Jr, both him and his father seem to love being soldier and love their unit
given wrong data, don't really think it was his fault at that point
I think he still persisted in ordering ships to stay in formation until quite late?
further combat will only be ineffective when our navy so eclipses yours they cannot find targets

just stan spruance

When New Mexico was struck by two kamikaze on the night of 12 May 1945 a hasty search by Spruance's staff found the Admiral manning a fire hose amidship. Determining that New Mexico was not too badly damaged to remain on station Spruance kept her as his flagship for the rest of the campaign.
Gahd wtf this maintenance is long asffff
@manic latch Oi. For you. 
Holy fucking Kron
Thank you
Didn’t her hull almost get done before they scrapped her
Scharnhorst but with Bismarck seconadries 
Is this an O-class 
looks like general had a history session
They usually have an alternate history session.
Ye but i prefer this one
No, it's Soviet Gouden Leeuw.
wat ship is dat?
Kronshtadt.
looks like soyuz
Not quite. Kron was only 5% complete.
For comparison, Soyuz was around...20%?
I
do not know what to say
WAT
Shinano was a luxurious tanker.
Russian navy "and then it got worse"
%10*
Your joking right?
Kronshtadt construction was kept slow since
They were waiting the guns from Germans
The 380mms
google pulled this up on me
Lies
she was an aircraft carrier
i don't see what's wrong
the worst one that is.
Google just looks for the biggest one and calls it a day
It's just that the answer isn't for the question posed.
It was the US Naval Attache's estimate, but fair enough.
Yes, its possible Soviets did this to cause more confusion on enemy. Similar to how Hipper looks like Bismarck from far
Taiho just had a fatal flaw and bad DMC
It's more convergent design than confusion.
lol from hipper class to H class
Shinano on the other hand
still, no good.
Well hood and pow shot at Prinz Eugen first, thinking she was the Bismarck, so.... I guess it worked
Sevastopol (Kronshtadt class No.2) was even more lol,lmao.
well its the silhouette the same right?
She was scrapped by Germans
"The lead ship has to be the Bismarck!" iirc
The main reason why Hood engaged Prinz Eugen because the latest intelligence reports indicated that Bismarck was leading the squadron.
The two swapped places after Bismarck's gunfire disabled her forward radar.
This was not relayed over to Holland.
well wat was better other than shinano?
Did you know Bismarck's guns were so powerful they disabled her own radar! 
Holland?
Still most hilarious design flaw imo
Holland the person. Not to be confused with the ship or county.
Lancelot Holland, the commanding officer.
The shockwave cut the wires
Also not a flaw inherent to Bismarck only.
of hood right?
Massachusetts and New Jersey both disabled their own radar by their own gun fire at some point. Do you call it a "hilarious design flaw" for them as well?
Yes.
They didn't do it every single time they shot tho
wait wat happened to the other hipper classes
Are you aware of how their radar gets disabled?
Bismarck was firing "over the beam" - at extreme angles.
i know wat happened to blucher..
Early electronics are very sensitive and radars being disabled by shock is not uncommon at all
Most of the time, ships tend to fire directly broadside, contrary to what a video game will tell you.
When they don't do that, things get damaged.
During many naval battles radio would just stop working every time a gun was fired.
or worse, people get injured.
Yep
Ayy maintenance about to be over
Hipper - crammed by glowworm
Prinz Eugen - survived and turned over to the Americans, getting nuked
Blücher - sunk by coastal artillery
mostly one certain video game
Rodney broke every lightbulb and allegedly every fucking forward urinal when she commenced fire on Bismarck.
and even then, sometimes it's better to fire flat broadside
Her teak plating was also found to be in shambles.
Nelson, during gunnery trials, broke a lot of the bridge windows when firing not directly broadside.
To be fair, that's what 9 16" guns in the same location does to a ship.
Shockwaves are bad, and as Phoenix said, electronics are sensitive.
Heck, big guns and modern radars don't mix to well either. This is why they couldn't give the Iowa's anything better than Stingers for air defense when she was modernizing in the 1980s
The types of radars needed to guided SAMs could not deal with the shock from 16" guns
Or worse, you're a Yamato AA crew on an unshielded 25mm near the turrets
and you didn't hear the alarm for main guns going off because the ongoing action is too loud
wouldn't be the first time 46cm guns for aa purposes committed friendly fire

Skin tearing Pressure ye
It collapses your lungs
But yes, Bismarck in that case was telling Norfolk to piss off - who wandered too near while shadowing the squadron.
Hence firing at extreme angles, and disabling her radar. Not exactly an inherent flaw, rather an unforunate incident.
even in a video where an abrams is doing nothing more than shooting T-72s at night without them firing back, the crew voices alone make it more immersive than any other tank simulator
imagine this but for a warship
I don't really think
you could pull off the gunner heat PC voices
with naval combat
100 AA gunner yelling
maybe you can switch between positions and hear the voices for each one
Just put conning tower voices
i.e. you can switch directly to the AA crewmen but you lose situational awareness of the rest of the ship
be me
stare at PC for 6 hours, watching my ship get to the small waypoint at a godawful 10 knots
suddenly shells in the dark just straight up trash your ship and you can't fight back, go back to the dockyard
epic simulation
or you see planes appear on the horizon and can do nothing as they slowly approach you at 100 knots
Qwerty ASMR
yes hearing people slowly burn alive in the fighting compartment
very relaxing
"oh my god, the tank is on fire"
You're probably going to hear muffled screams if anything
those voice tubes get busted
This game is very promising, I really can't wait to see it's full potential in the futur.
The tank crew voice available for the M60 and M1 is so good, this is way better then the "yEs, a hiT!" we're all used to.
I'm planning to make more vids on this gem, and if you want to test it out they have a free demo and a patreon.
Check their site: ht...
context for anyone who hasn't seen ghpc
I really could just play GHPC over WT and be much happier with my life
Break free from the snail
I don't have to deal with KA-50s dumping 6 VIKRs at me at once in GHPC
I am the F-14
Turkish Pantsir for US tech tree 
T-80U and Abrams
Hold on so I'm reading rn on the sinking of Edinburgh and I'm wondering why the ship never just fired back and actually casted away her tow?
I'm trying to get it, but My PC is too Low-End for it
"Although her guns were in disarray, she fired on the attacking German ships. Edinburgh's second salvo hit Hermann Schoemann, leaving her in a sinking condition"
I can run it im just too poor
Yeah but why did she have to cut her tow as well?
yeah wouldn't going in circles like make her more vulnerable than doing a steady course?
Nah
Japan carrier avoiding bombers for example

wait which carrier was this?
have you tried dive bombing anything before
or torpedo bombing anything
even in a game like wows
nope never played any of those games at all
Soryu
it's pretty difficult to hit anything turning
general rule
when dive bombing you want the target to be head on to you
when torpedo bombing you want them to be broadsiding to you
Going straight is one dimension calculation. Circle wants you two dimension
if you're turning, there's only one moment when you'll be broadside on/head on to the plane
which means either the enemy plane has to turn with you to find the optimal attack heading (no small feat given you're under constant aa and fighter attack and you're likely carrying hundreds to thousands of pounds of bombs)
or wait until you're at the right position (again, no small feat)
It's a heavy bomber
i suppose you can dive with it, probably not for long
either you pull up pretty early or you keep dive bombing and you give up on the chance to pull up
didn't the germans want to make a heavy bomber as a dive bomber
to put on my richie hat
germans
i'm sure it's very different
didn't edinburgh sink to mines?
no. sub attacked her, tried to limp back to port and got caught by destroyers and bombers
He-177 yes
She can dive bomb as I know
Why
You mistake with Tu-4 I think
Why did Germans make almost all their bombers dive bombers
oh a tu-2, yeah probably
Doctrine
Dive bombing brought quick results early
And turned out to be something British Naval AA was utterly inept against
Because dive-bombing offered better accuracy during this period of military aviation (and German bombsight technology was limited heading into the war)
it just seems funny to me that the Germans made everything a dive bomber, even their largest bombers
Ju-87 experience
Dive bombers are accurate
That's why naval doesn't use carpet bombers
Usually
Allows near pin point accuracy
They saw the concept in Spain, and then adopted it for their doctrine
The result worked very well in Poland and France, so they stuck with it
It also worked well against ships, they got two Tribals in the first months of the war with dive bombing attacks
Tribals?
Tribal class destroyers
i see
Gurkha and Afridi?
Honestly, if there's one thing the RN is good at most of the time, it's picking names 😛
...Ignoring conventions and all that.
It has ups and downs.
the US system is easy enough to recognise and figure out a pattern.
RN.....fucking good luck with that, minus the ABCDEFGs.
I like china's way of naming capital ships after provinces
Is it the Oto or the Israeli one 
dutch kremlin strikes again


Lay thine eyes upon xi’s towel and plate
amog
why the removal of the crane
No boats
its the Israeli one
at least the vehicle is the Israeli one
Yeah thought so
Then again the 60mm kinda started as a join project
Iirc
I dont remember the details
its the Israeli M113 with the 60 MM so its safe to assume its the Israeli one
Bruh why tf did they collect this
and then learned absolutely nothing from it because a T-80U is still better than any challenger variant

Also,QWERTY in the PLA museum?

Elaborate
's what it says on the tin
they probably did, but britain be britain
especially post 45 britain
better gun, better protection, better weight and mobility
i guess chally's got better thermals later
but thats basically it

tbf this is a more recent british thing
the last time the british got a gotcha like this was the t-54 in hungary
which led to gods gift to NATO the L7
How long would it take to reverse engineer a type 2 civilization spaceship
Chally 2 vs a T-80U no beyond the weight part
in terms of the British rifled 120 MM and the 125 it’s a toss up
tho the British gun doesn’t really have the same limitations as the T-80s autoloader puts on the gun
If it’s going to crack a chally 2 it’s going to crack a T-80U
challenger 2s are fat, slow barges with terrible protection schemes
CR2 has no hull armor at all lmao, and no mantlet. The turret cheeks are the only good parts of the scheme.
nope, it's just a T-80U
and I'm personally involved in the CR2 leaks so I'd know about that mantlet issue
🤨 the T-80s mantlet isn’t even that well protected either
its less huge
the tank by large is much lower profile and has actual hull armor
especially bad if we keep in mind not all ammo in existence is built to get through K5 either
then it's just sad to be in a challenger
British still pissed about selling Rolls-Royce RB.41 Nene engines to Soviet Union?
tfw I put fake declassified stamps on my document
the infamous
I’m just of the opinion I’d rather be in the Chally 2 than the T-80U
Dunno man. Chal 2 doesn't have blowout panels
While stronger turret face its bigger
I don't have one for CR2... but here's CR1's weight breakdown. CR2 uses the same hull and a heavier turret made of worse steel.
Historically chally 2s have had far less of a tendency of having the turret go to space
I also have actual fire control systems to work with
Hmm
all the rigorous protracted combat challenger 2s have been in like
that was the tank being scuttled
five minutes of jihadi plinking
So flying turret is fine when it's scuttled
wasn’t that the bulk of the T-80Us until recently as well
tho I would rather be in a T-80 than a challenger 1 to be fair
stand by for my hip tank girl gacha tier list
i mean dont get me wrong, i like chally 2s because they're incredibly
Once the T-80 gets actual fire control then my opinion switches around so T-80BVM > chally 2
incredibly aesthetic
best looking mbt in service atm by a mile
probably my third favorite tank in general
but i know when to say it's shit next to its competitors
and boy howdy does it suck ass compared to a T-80U
During the great dig on challenger info, even went down to metallurgy.
idk I’m just of the opinion that I’m more likely to win in a chally 2 than I am in a T-80U
unfortunately that's not the truth
I've got pages of this stuff in my DMs with Korv.
and there's much more to being a good tank than "can i win this 1v1 joust"
as in I actually have modern fire control systems to usually get the first shot off and actually win the engagement
Real man use T-80 with 152mm if you gonna do 1v1
Wikipedia is often the first place people check to find common information, such as the flag of a country. While usually accurate, Wikipedia has on occasion gotten national flags completely incorrect, leading to these flags propagating across the internet and real life.
Timestamps
- 00:00 - Introduction
- 00:51 - Austria-Hungary
- 08:56 - Co...
oh wow that's war
not a wikipedia page
again Id rather be in neither if I’m getting hit
Object 490 is perfect choice for you 
no kremlin not the forbidden dong t-80
I’d rather be in a standard T-80 so I have actual ammo capacity
You'd be amazed at the stuff that leaks through censorship over the decades. (This isn't a Chally but it's not hard to figure out what it is...)
Why you need that much ammo in 1v1
man I’m not even speaking 1v1

It apparently only won over the Leopard 2, the preferred option, and Abrams because of lobbying from what I've read
I’m just thinking the chally 2s gonna be better for going into combat with over the T-80U
it wont
It only one because Thatcher put her foot down that the tank had to be domestic.
especially not a 90s ch2
I miss Object 477 
(I have more photos, but those wedges are hollow and just used for routing things like cables)
Common Mantlet shots can be real or myth
Regular version or TES?
Iltam zumra rashupti ilatim
PLAGF Abrams when
if you mantlet any tank odds are it’s gonna end being combat ineffective
Ehhhh
@tough quail
real and true
3500 bce moment
i mean the leaks dont really matter practically speaking
Gotta win those internet brownie points somehow
nobody is out there reading the WT forums and then trying to aim for the mantlet
man it’s the tank that’s being re turreted right mow
what if I told you that soldier, who was part of ADTU, didn't get more than a slap on the wrist for it?
alongside the tank that’s probably gonna end up having a few destroyed in combat pretty soon
i wonder what happened to the guy who literally did a recording of the turret traversing with a stop watch
Fucking finally Arena-M appears again for water proof tests
"The Arena-M active defense complex on the T-72 tank has successfully passed tests not only with Russian anti-tank missile systems, but also with foreign, captured ammunition (likely Javelin and Nlaw). We were informed about this in the holding "High-precision complexes" of the state corporation "Rostec".
In the future, the Arena-M active protection complex is planned to be installed on T-90 and T-80 tanks"
sure i would
someone could leak how shit the ufp is
it doesn't really matter because everyones aiming center mass anyway
If it’s on war thunder forums it’s probably already in the hands of intelligence agencies
also that
Why not T-72s?
there's probably a dude in china who can hand build CR2s out of clay as of a decade ago
I’d assume they’d want to install them on their best



as well, I suppose






