#history
1 messages · Page 83 of 1
Millions of people try to reach America every year
some people here have chronic grass is greener syndrome
this was 1890s korea
It was with no exaggeration a shithole of zero value
Whatever they saw in the hermit kingdom of Joseon, I do not understand. Even less, their willingness to stay and die in such a place. But they did die and they are buried here in the land they wanted to be in, for whatever reason.
That is more than I can say.
I love shells
Well, missioner back then was true believer unlike now. I can have my disagreement with Christianity but the willingness to spread what they believe and place themselves in danger make them admirable
Sea shells or 380mm naval shell?
I love armor

Armor is overated, no armor is best armor

oh no
How did they enact the test? Using less powder to simulate the impact?
Yes
What I will say is that they followed the commandment of Christ, even for the least of peoples.
I do not think more of them because they placed themselves in danger. Dying is easy. I think more of them because they lived for Joseon.
That's why no armor for over pen
sometimes all glory to massive warhead
God bless Anti-Ship Missiles.
the defense offense competition makes better examples of both
God bless ECM
Gun wins most of the time
The golden age of armor was at the turn of the century 1800-1900 when armor was gigachad
And most shells broke up on it
For a short time until the brit introduce bigger gun with higher muzzle velocity
When tho
The first thing they did was make warrior
And her 68 and 110 pounders could not pen gloire
Nor could most irinclads in the 1860’s
Ironclads back then were only good for nuking wooden ships of the line
And by the 1870’s everyone was making new ships
And the US made this
Maka explain

everything is a shell if you believe
Didn't someone try a Hexagonal naval gun?
Yes
There was a big competition of whitworth (hexagonal) vs french vs scott vs blakey rifling etc
Hexagonal rifling did not make the cut
@spring briar Do you know anything about the exterior ballistics and body weights of the Emile Bertin SAPC?
https://twitter.com/RyszardJonski/status/1640418700552699904
https://twitter.com/RyszardJonski/status/1640418704734273536
Early bronze rifled gun
Rifling was invented by a Belgian in 1824 ish
But it took until 1859 for it to really take off

1860’s US rifling

Back when noone really knew what the twist would have to be
Krem is that from sniper ghost warrior
Why is the case rifled???0
It's just paint
@delicate beacon
Is that a cased canonball? 
How thick do you want the driving band to be?
Yes.
Well that’s 1860’s tech for ya
No better alternative before multiple copper driving bands
Well except studded shells ofc

These have their own disadvantages ofc (needs to be muzzle loaded)
So for land warfare the lead sheath was better (rof advantage) and for naval purposes the studded was better (better shell)
Not sure if that's supposed to be extreme taper or extra long shoulder
someone in another server claimed Japan built some 400 Tiger tank copies for the defense of their Homelands
anyone got a sourcely that remotely corroborate this?
IJA did buy Tiger and plan to license build but as far as I know, the Tiger they bought was conscript back into the Wehrmacht and the license build plan never go anywhere
Tornado?
SU-24
Gives off Mig-23 vibes
It was back when everyone was mad about sweep wing aircraft
I see
No tiger tank but they did upgrade the Chi ha to Chi nu with 75mm gun but that's thing never seen action outside of Home Islands
At best they realistically might use Chi-To/Chi-Ri, but even that already have production issues
this tracks with what I know about Japanese production
Using tiger for defense would be peak noncrediblility
just flabbergasted by the 400 Tigers of Hokkaido thing
Just drop another nuke in said tiger formation
That is some serious weeb copium
Not only the Tiger but where you gonna find the fuel and spare part to running those tanks
Also
not weeb, the guy who said that simply tends toward weird takes on certain historical events and assertions without proper sourcing
Wasn’t there a instance in the normaandy landings where a USN ship blew up panthers n shit using its main gun
Texas iirc, she intentionally flood on one side to raise the gun up and shoot farther
That why I love Texas so much
Here we go again
Well, there was some guy who said IJN could have invade Hawaii right after Pearl attack so I am not much of surprise

There were a lot of ships involved in Normandy landings

Lots of ships were involved at Normandy - Rodney was the one famously halting a battalion of Tigers - so basically any naval ship, really
coastal bombardment = bad for your health
Not saying Tex definitely get the kill, just saying why I love her
I'm more focusing on the Texas flooded her thing
It's repeated ad nauseam, unfortunately
Also, a destroyer might arguably be more useful when it comes to continued supporting bombardment
You need the big guns for heavier fortifications, sure, but sustained and unironically raining hell constantly, you'd probably want a DD instead
Da
Remind me of some USN cruiser that provide shore bombardment during the later stage in the Pacific
Probably why Grom became one of the most hated ships by Germans in the Norwegian Theatre
Which one was it that intentionally come closer to bait out Japanese shore battery again?
I only remember Colorado getting too close and eating a bit of shit.
Birmingham?

Yeah, it was Birmingham
Yeeeap, 22 hits, 43 dead, 198 wounded
Trap shots?
Tbf, it was 6inch gun battery
Still unideal imo
Though I can't think of anything better to do, considering the effect of bombardment with cases like Iwo Jima and so on forth
Something something Saipan ratio, Okinawa ratio
the centenary of the Italian Airforce is today
https://twitter.com/NichoConcu/status/1640652721475710977/photo/1
8 Eurofighters, 6 F-35s and 8 MB-346
sadly i couldnt go to any of the open days so im only stuck with the videos and pics posted by other people 
A former Australian special forces soldier who was charged with a war crime related to his deployment in Afghanistan has been granted bail, after a Sydney magistrate accepted he was in a potentially dangerous position in custody. https://t.co/t0EyAcKfAO
Was bail like
You pay money then
You are free until court makes a decision
After that you have to come to court
Bail is when you pay up to be allowed out of custody until your trial date

@spring briar
The 152-mm Modèle 1930 gun with a 55-caliber barrel could fire semi-armor-piercing projectiles weighing 57.1 or 56 kg at a distance of 26.8 km at an elevation angle of 45 °. Also, these guns, due to the maximum elevation angle of 90 °, could theoretically be used for anti-aircraft fire with an altitude reach of 14 km. But due to the impossibility of loading at an angle of over 75 ° and low elevation speed, as well as the practical rate of fire of 6.5 rds / min. they could only conduct barrage fire on the barrel

“Potentially dangerous”
What, was he gonna get shanked in prison?
Oh noes

Wait, what kind of base is that
There’s supposed to be a thick lead driving band around that
Oh yeah @manic latch do you know if there are any range tables out there for the 152mm/57 Pattern 1938? And ditto for the 180mm/57 Pattern 1932 
If he dies in prison it does fuck up a potential prosecution and therefore any future cases
I will search. But current stuff i know about 152mm of Chapayev/Sverdlov are
Max elevation is 45°
Range 30.2km
950m/s
I have data about all shells and I think I might have some for the ballistics
@gusty nest
The big three

Looks like HE
it is yes
but there's like 7 different kinds of soviet 152 mm HE
and all look very similar other than the nose fuze
if ya want any specific data I can get it for ya jaba
I mean, I’ll take if it’s not too inconvenient, but I should preface by saying I’m mostly looking for AP and SAP type projectiles for my purposes
I have AP and SAP type projectiles of soviet make
I have a whole book full of them in fact

just look at some of the 152's
pages full of them

so if you need specific info, hit me up
Range tables pls 
jaba do you want to make a range table tool
with me
that has as input: shell shape, weight and V0
and that gives the trajectory?
because we both need plenty of range tables that we can't access

just a suggestion
Richel using quantumcomputer to print 3d BB shells
Check that pinned comment tbh
Music: Red Alert ost remastered
https://ko-fi.com/oxideyt
Gondola: https://www.redbubble.com/shop/ap/58883651
Also consider funding my next projects: https://www.patreon.com/Oxide1
Discord: https://discord.gg/FKNpTQC
Shirts: https://www.redbubble.com/people/Smertnosny/shop
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/oxid...
neat
mp7 pens more because it's a full steel penetrator
neither do more than dent soviet armor at the time
what's the armor level in nato equivalent
turns out even an m16 with green tip couldn't get through the 80s ceramic
3?
so uh anyone in the backline was absolutely fucked
556 green tip isn't anything to go off ngl
and I'd add those 4.6 and 5.28's are best against level 3a soft body armor
aka without plates
rather sad innit
What is that
found a 1895 article on French shell caps
they are and are very good at that

its more addressing the whole doctrinal use of
"hey! we can give these to backline personnel to defend themselves from paratroopers!"
p90 round bounces off of a vdv helmet
"FUCK"
hell yeah
ok imma start printing out these articles and putting them in a binder
Sounds about right.
UK/US be like: cannot be made fun of for surrender if you retreat from every battle 
🦅 True
Surrendering gives the enemy all of your resources and hands you a major L
A retreat denies them that, and depending on the situation can be a victory
Fair, but losing ground and bases is also a form of ceding resources. Especially when it's the oil Japan desperately needed and you based your victory partly on.
The Finns have been fighting the Soviet Union since the Winter War. But now, Marshal Mannerheim and Prime Minister Risto Ryti look like they might pull out of the Eastern Front commitments they agreed upon with their Axis allies. German-Finnish relations seem to be at breaking point, and Red Army troops are threatening the borders. How long will...
Lapland 
This Tone or Chikuma
think TOne
https://twitter.com/NavalInstitute/status/1640820899526868996
https://twitter.com/NavalInstitute/status/1640820901196230657
Does it count as retreat if practically all but one ships were blown up? 
Sorry for ping @strong plank . But months ago you asked me about did Soviets laid down CV around ww2 or not. Seems naval historians had no clue so just assumed Kronshtadt was a carrier, this is a writing from 1966
Only by "recent thinking" they started to think it's a Scharnhorst like
do Bradley and humvees get something like the TUSK?
i see
uhh
did any other tank/armored vehicle get something like a upgrade kit
this shit making me curios

Kronshtadt of the Treti International class (known as Project K-1000) was a triple screw 60.000t aircraft carrier with 3x3 406mm guns and 420mm belt. She was launched 16th March 1954 as target ship.
Was my intelligence correct?

rad
What engine is that
I think Klimov VK-1?
It's a gun!
Ah shit
You know how Soviets thought Iowa had 482mm belt?
It seems there is another
They thought Des Moines had 203mm belt

you see the soviets had my psychological profile analyzed
they just take chunks of the belt off and cram it into the gun barrels lol
btw, was this pre reagan or post reagean
Hmm 1950-53
because i know reagean boasted a lot about how the iowas are invincible
what if I pour hot chocolate into Jet engine fuel
tastes funny but still good
What if I pour molten lava into your mouth
What if you didn't
What if I pour soviet copium into your eyes
You dare to use my own spell against me potter
depends, condiments? bun type?
I am the CCP,I specialize in Stealing soviet stuff
Liu sha bao style


no idea

danke
I come back here after like what a year and you guys are actin all crazy
Anyways here's a C-130A
There it is Maka, Jane's fighting ships on Iowa in 1950 
19"-16" belt armor Iowa
it's beautiful yeh

HMAS Sydney is a case of a warship that is, perhaps, more famous for her sinking than her service. This in spite of having a very successful career up to the point of her sinking. A shame, then, that it had to be overshadowed by the end of the ship.
Her sinking is one wrapped in controversy, not least because we will never know the full story o...
woe
@round moth what an interesting reaction to the deaths of over 600 men
Do you mean the Australian ship?
yes
all 600 men aboard Sydney went down with the ship, bar a single survivor whose corpse washed up on Christmas island 3 months later
hardly joyous i'd argue
Most moral Roon fan
I mean it's kinda funny when the Australian make the ship
And I don't even know that
Sorry
what
what
What
Australia had a sizeable navy if that's what you're surprised about
Australia still has a decent sized navy
Yes I knew that
Least deranged IB fan
i genuinely dont know
i feel like theres some sort of insult here but im not confident enough to say for sure
Spon. Just trust in Hanlon's razor
like i dont want to be unnecessarily mean
so im giving benefit of the doubt
but i really dont know
He probably watched like one kormoran video without thinking about the context idk
It's times like these that I really hate having this color with my name
Least deranged Roon simp
Lmao didn’t even see undie’s comment before this
qwerty failing to understand the english language again


No no I read that
I just
Didn’t care
I haven’t dabbed on a red name for being stupid in weeks and I need a fix
you are not funny

Did you know about the cook in Moby Dick novel?
He preaches the sharks at night and says "How angelic beings you would be if you could just control your hunger" but sharks wouldn't understand him
They do
Big version
Those stud thing, for the rifle groove I assume
Apparently even Singapore is building 10 k ton vessels
Welcome to the new Naval arm race in SEA
Not enough top mast for you, Krem?

Sides will be flat af as tradition now
Isn't sonar more about vibration and engine
You mean Sub?
Is it possible to shape a keel to be harder to detect via sonar
Either quieter or smoother running engine
You could coat the hull in Sonar absorption material but it is expensive and redundant outside of sub
Lockheed had some ideas
I’m honestly not sure but idt it’s viable
There's active and passive sonar too.
Armed with this knowledge, Lockheed's famous Skunk Works set out to design a stealthy submarine using this principle. The idea was to be invisible to the active sonar used by enemy submarines, aircraft and ships. And incoming torpedoes
Knowledge was
While developing the stealth aircraft which we know today as the F-117A Nighthawk (aka Stealth Fighter), Lockheed chanced upon something. It turned out that the faceted sides of the aircraft didn't only deflect radar, they deflected sonar too. They found this out because a polaroid camera couldn't focus on the plane. This was because it used a form of sonar to measure the distance
Yeah, this likely wouldn’t do much against passive sonar
Krem, did the Gepard Class Frigate use towed sonar array? They tend to gloss over those in news article and I only know that Gepard have modification for ASW.
MGK-335EM-03 with under-keel antenna
Ok this picture is 05 not 03. Tho I don't know their difference
76 
right Singapore uses a different mount
76mm is a good caliber
Or 100mm
US: Not anymore
chooses 57mm for Constellation
@spiral cedar sorry for the ping but do you have immune zone data and range tables for cruiser on cruiser action
Ah, they have to justify for Independence class and LCS system somehow
Yeah..
Remind me of Soviet ASW escort ship with twin 57mm back at the stern
@frigid karma here's one
Justification is
"While the 57 mm cannon may not seem as powerful as larger naval guns, such as the OTO Melara 76 mm, some of its performances are comparable; given its rate of fire and amount of explosive per shell, the Bofors gun actually achieves a higher amount of "explosive fired per second" than the 76 mm."


So more shell weight throw down the range, I prefer the individual Shel performance than dps
@frigid karma Another
By range tables, do you mean you want like X angle of fall and Y impact velocity at Z range?
Here, list of almost all real and designed Soviet naval guns 
Probably but you have no idea how fast it'll go so your tables are moot.
Also most shells come with different casings.
You can put a 12.7 browning in a 12 gauge
If that’s what you mean
But like sang said, casings
Same reason why you can't use the shell for Panther 75mm in pak40 75mm, dif shell casing and pressure
Casings aren't part of the shell. Casings are part of the round
Ah, I need to update on the terminology again
M2 shell in a DSHK? 
I wonder how many instances of extreme temperatures warped shells so they don’t fit
Probably extremely rare, but I’d be surprised if it never happened
friend
Max ranges under ideal target angles at which various CL-caliber guns penetrate the Zara-class main belt. Note the second US shell is not introduced until 1944
So
If a tank and a ground based gun have the same gun
Can it’s shells be used interchangeably
Well duh
Also they may want to share the same type of shells.
Wait, why do Britain and Japan have no EFF pen?
This is facehardened armor and they are firing shells without proper AP caps
130mm/50 is super based 
The ijn gun didn’t have proper AP caps?
The British CPBC has only a thin mild steel hood, and the Japanese AP has only a sub-caliber cap head
Huh, til
The Japanese 15.5cm and 20cm AP had sub-caliber cap heads
How big of a gun will a T-34 need to have the recoil filp it over
The BB caliber APC had full AP caps
T-34-85 tank
Type 1 is just Type 91 with a dye bag and slightly more streamlined ballistic cap btw
Diving shell memes
You can see the BB caliber shell has a true AP cap covering the body across the full diameter
She can handle 100mm, so likely 122mm or more is her limit
But the cruiser caliber shell only has a sub-caliber cap head
Which won't poke a big enough hole in the armor plate to let the shell body pass through without breaking
Like when i shoot it it goes and filos backwards
Filps
Egyptians put 122s on them
What
So
Then 152mm I guess
No
Rare ASPI W
tfw it's 1942 and your shells are still as shit as they were in 1905
just in a different way
What caused stagnation of Japan's naval technology?
British stop helping?
limited resources and probably limited competition with other sea faring nations
kinda turned japanese shell development into an echo chamber
Aren't those IJA patrol craft?

Two shots. Field "secret" bronze howitzer of the 1753 model of the P.I.Shuvalov system. Firing range 532 meters. Actively used during the Seven Years' War. The barrel is made in order to increase the dispersion of buckshot along the front of the enemy. To keep the secret, the tip of the barrel was always covered from prying eyes. After Zorndorf, when a number of guns fell into the hands of the Prussians, King Frederick II ordered them to be displayed in Berlin under the motto "Russia's Big Secret".
@manic latch
Shotgun
sadly they didn't use it to finish off prussia
Does it actually help though
How effective was explosive shell during the American civil war?
10pdr Parrott?
Field gun then
Is there written document on how Civil War artillery unit was organized? Are they attach to infantry brigade or Corp level?

funny story, the US was still using napoleon style artillery throughout the 1870's-WW1 era
atleast in the army ofc
the brunt of artillery developments went to naval guns while the US army was vibin with napoleons
and ofc various early rifled guns like the parrot
but by ww1 the mle.1897 existed so the US army went to town on those
good investment
Americans did like their French artillery

can't blame em
it was really nice
🇺🇸 🤝 🇫🇷
all ya need to conquer the wild west is a parrot
And barbed wire

The Gloster Meteor was the RAF’s first jet fighter, bringing Britain into the Jet Age. At the same time, engineers of the German Luftwaffe had been working on developing their own operational jet fighter, and the Messerschmitt Me 262 entered service a few months before the Meteor. However, these early jets were relatively underpowered, and while...
so cute
Don't have particular optimism about its stability
should be alright
as long as the barrel isn't too long
I'm more afraid of the shell starting to yaw inside the barrel
it's very short and almost a sphere so there's a good chance of that happening if it isn't properly seated
thankfully it's so short it doesn't need a lot of rotation to stabilise
Ah, that makes more sense
To keep shells like that centered inside the barrel they added two studs atleast
Ideally a bit more
And then there’s this

Drill bit looking shell
Spin faster

Spinning a shell too fast will make it land on its side or base when fired
Fucking knew it would happen
Chal 2 and Abrams next 
its gonna be the BMP issue
where the armor isn't thick enough to sustain it
it does but I still don't think it can sustain kontakt
there are specialty kits for ifv ERA but I don't think russia ever exported it
the funny kaktus stuff
yeah thats built specifically to not explode it
Nato MBT fans the moment they see ERA
I mean they slapped the ERA where the tank most likely is going to need it
Chal 2 %100 gonna get it then for lower glacis
not sure if the combat ready Ukrainian chally 2s are gonna have the British add on armor added or not
changed out the A2s for A1s since apparently it's going to be faster
suspecting the marine corps M1A1s might be the ones being sent
Era on warships when
In 2012 a rouge team of navy seals tried to take over USS Nevada (SSBN 733) the crew of Nevada stoped them harmlessly
Cost: yes
"The layout of the M2A3 Bradley is similar to the standard version of Bradley M2A2. The hull and the turret of the Bradley are constructed of welded aluminum and supplemented at critical locations by spaced laminate armor. In addition, Bradley M2A3 has appliqué steel armor which can be fitted with additional passive armor or Explosive Reactive Armour (ERA). The ERA consists of 96 tiles fixed to the sides, turret, and front of the vehicle, which enhance protection against a variety of anti-armor munitions including shoulder-launched Rocket Propelled Grenades (RPG)."
ERA seems to go over where the armor has been previously reinforced on the Bradley so
Everyone gangsta till you put them on port
TikTok brainrot moment
They shave up to half a year off the delivery time
Believe the difference is mostly in stuff like fire control, sights
Articles are saying it’s the M1A1 SA variant
int e re sting
Richel's hideout
Its where he keeps his broken down Panzer 3s and 4s
First one is tomKat?
Mig-29?
No

Looks like a mash up of a bunch of different planes
hmm
It’s a single tail F-14
The 2nd plane is a German MIG-29
It was a mock up by Grumman
Originally the tomcat was only gonna have one vertical stabilizer
I’m scared of that thing
cursed bmp
Nah cursed one use 125mm
British: Yeah I know right, stashes this under rug
that looks like an ifv with a challenger turret strapped on top 
It's a Bradley hull yes
the bradley we have at home
man the path to the sprut was a fucking nightmare
Wanna see the cutest Soviet helicopter?
hit me
It was designed to be launched from Submarine torpedo launchers
You take it out from the tube
Then bam
Ka-56 is ready
thats adorable
Only problem it never got a piston engine small and strong enough. So it never fly 
it continues to be a nightmare considering how badly sprut procurement has gone
Tomorrow we will have either, Diet Abrams, Abrams Mini, Abrams Lite, or nonfat Abrams
waiting for the legendary double barrel widebrams
interesting how the predecessors to the current chinese type 15 and the american MFP
are both
from vietnam era

light tanks are truly the most oppressed group
and i mean
even these days
it's mostly just "hey we really really want a 105 in a fucky wucky muddy or wet place"
even though there's nothing stopping you from fitting a 120/125 on the same weight class
it's goofy
yeah modern light tanks in general are just

for the most part just
get a ifv with some missiles on it
you can scout, you can knock out tanks, you got your own infantry
you can't knock out fortifications but a 30mm is plenty good enough for infantry support
but i guess that last reason is why countries are still trying to build them
holy fuck it's 130 i need to sleep
with how enormous newer IFVs are becoming you could probably just fit a full gun on them with a troop compartment if you got creative
yeah same buddy
yeap
You could also use light tanks for providing support in places where MBTs would have trouble getting to
well, yes, that's the main reason why countries are still building them
4:30 am, time to go home soon from work
mfp is almost certainly designed to help amphibious landings and whatnot
the question is
why not just use an amphibious IFV
MPF isn't meant for amphibious landings
nor is it meant to exactly replace a Abrams
ok poor wording on my part
its meant to be a air transportable fire support platform for infantry divisions
it's meant to waste money because they went with incredibly flaccid requirements
so, supporting infantry, destroying fortifications etc etc
its something the army has been wanting for a long time
nvm it is
but budget cuts keep preventing it (XM8)
it can't be parachuted but it needs to be able to get shoved into a plane
Griffin considering its about 30 years newer than XM8 is the better platform of the two
even though you could do both with more firE POWER WHY IS IT SO MID
mixture of a ton of 105 ammo being in storage, higher ammo capacity and access to HESH for anti structure work
also its not really like the infantry units don't already have plenty of tank killing capability
well, recently there's been a drop but there'll likely be a surplus of 155 in the near future
not 105 howitzer ammo
still the correct answer
light tank with the full length MBT-70 gun capable of firing APFSDS
also I don't really think air droppable capability is worth it considering the trade off of armor
since uhhhh
when are we even going to actually air drop
it was a interim tank meant for high mobility in mountain terrain
that ended up not being a interim vehicle due to the cold war ending
in terms of air droppable capability I'm actually serious
when are we ever gonna air drop into combat in sizeable amounts
The Moon
Actually now that i think about it lunar armor would be dope as fuck
Half the gravity, half the restrictions
Operation Northern Delay occurred on 26 March 2003 as part of the 2003 invasion of Iraq. It involved dropping paratroopers into Northern Iraq. It was the last large-scale combat parachute operation conducted by the U.S. military since Operation Just Cause.
"During the next two weeks at Bashur Airfield, all supplies arrived via the airlines of communication (ALOC) on C-17s and C-130s from Ramstein Air Base, Germany through Constanta Air Base, Romania. During an average 24-hour day of operations, more than 40 Air Force 463L ALOC pallets would arrive. Each pallet then had to be downloaded from the plane, transported to the SSA, processed and finally issued either to storage or to customers.
Some of the C-17s carried huge M1-A Abrams tanks and weighed from 250,000 to 300,000 pounds when they landed. After two weeks of use by heavy cargo planes, parts of Bashur's 7,000-foot runway crumbled, forcing the closure of 2,300 feet."
like every modern combat jump has just been securing a airfield from a opposition with greatly weakened air defenses that allowed for the airlifting of armor
Operation Rhino was a raid led by the United States Army's 75th Ranger Regiment (Regimental Reconnaissance Company) and (3rd Ranger Battalion), who were led by Colonel Joseph Votel, and other SOCOM units on several Taliban targets in and around Kandahar, Afghanistan during the invasion of Afghanistan at the start of the War in Afghanistan.
With surface orbital velocity of only 1.6 km/s you can even shoot yourself on your back with your own gun 
This post has been updated with a statement from Newport News Shipbuilding. Production of the Navy’s first-in-class Columbia-class ballistic missile submarine – District of Columbia (SSBN-826) – is 10 percent behind schedule, Secretary of the Navy Carlos Del Toro told a House panel on Wednesday. Likewise, the production of Virginia-class attack ...
%10
Yeah because there's currently a Los Angeles class sub named Columbia already
Considering the building cadence of Virginia-class, 688i Columbia will probably already getting decommissioned by the time DC getting into service
Just keep her in Galveston holy shit
It's already a major beach resort town
And it has the actual fucking drydock
Ok, just some fun questions but what do you guys really think about Zheng He ships and his expedition? I try to read about them but either I get exaggerated number and some really flying colors comments or some consider the trip to be of little impact and doesn’t contribute anything.
imo, a great prestige achievement for sure, but relatively small actual economical value. I know that it does results in multiple Southeast Asian entities doing frequent kowtows to the court, which is a nice power projection value for the Ming
- 25% OFF -
Use code MILAVHIS to receive 25% OFF: https://www.usni.org/press/books
My reading list: https://www.usni.org/press/books?f[0]=subject%3A1959
Strategic bombing to win a war doesn’t work, we’ve figured this out after about 50years of trying to make it work. Whether the United States Air Force (USAF), the Royal Air Force (RAF) or ...
those australian virginias are looking very likely

worst case we get them second hand
Harold Holt is undoubtedly amongst Australia's most famous prime ministers purely for his mysterious disappearance in 1967. However, when he died, the Liberal Party would still be in power for five more years before the rise of Gough Whitlam.
In this video, Mr. Mitchell will look at the adminsitration that Harold Holt ran including his key poli...
👁️ US navy please invest into improving your shipbuilding infrastructure challenge impossible
the more I look into the BMD series of vehicles the more I ask, why the hell do these things exist
wheeze
like
the BMP-2 and BMP-3 are within the weight class to be airdropped
and are only 2-3 feet longer than the BMD-4
yet with the BMDs your sacrificing both dismount capacity and protection
upper limit for air drop ability is around 42k IBS or around 21 tons
BMP-3s about 20.6 tons
BMP-2s 15.6
BMD-4 is 15
even height wise the BMD-4s taller than the BMP-3
US INDOPACOM declaring Singapore a monarchy
I mean it basically is one with extra steps
anyway back to bashing the BMDs
you have a airborne IFV that's as heavy as the BMP-2, only slightly smaller, sacrifices 2 dismounts and sacrifices a large degree of protection as well
It isn’t?
I lived there when I was a kid and I’m pretty sure the government 1984s everyone
there is uh
a lot more to be considered for parachuting something than just air lifting it
especially for something you can parachute actually crewed
its not just "alright its light enough chuck it out the back"
You can’t air drop a BMD crewed
yes you can
the later ones at least
but crew or not the point remains
wiesels weigh like five pounds and they tried parachuting those and they just destroyed themselves hitting the ground
I don't think you can even air drop the BMD-4Ms crewed
ok nvm you can
I was thinking of the dismounts
🤨 tho personally I wouldn't want be inside of the vehicle being air dropped
Wiesel was designed for transportability by the CH-53 so not surprising
in terms of the BMDs themselves
that's the point
you have a air droppable IFV
you have to develop something specifically to not commit die after being parachuted
you do not have the capacity to air drop in large numbers
a bmp will dismantle itself
this IFV additionally sacrifices multiple important things for that air droppable capability
in terms of the BMP-3 and BMP-2 yeah obviously a standard BMP-2 isn't going to be air droppable
but again for the weight class you can have a far better vehicle
that sacrifices less things
combined with the other issue of actually having the capacity to reliably air drop more than a couple battalion of VDV at a time
The Russians have 4 VDV Divisions, and 4 VDV brigades but only around 132 IL-76 and AN-124 cargo aircraft to deploy them
leaving us with "There are other problems. Optimistically, Russia’s military transport aviation (VTA) is at best able to deliver between one and two regiments in a sortie. The aviation park of Il-76 heavy transports is simply not big enough for serious airborne operations, and certainly not in a contested environment. Given that Russia’s VDV trains to force generate as battalion tactical groups, more than likely the maximum air lift capacity is for two or three such formations. In practice, this means that Russia has one of the world’s largest airborne forces (approx 45,000 strong), but without the air lift to use them in their designated role. Indeed, according to Russian defense journalist Ilya Kramnik if Russia wanted to deliver its airborne in the initial period of war it would have to increase the air transportation park four-fold. This is simply impossible given the current rate of Il-76MD-90 modernization and aircraft production. At best the VTA is likely to tread water on the number of currently available aircraft in the strategic airlift role."
and the other issue I should probably mention at somepoint
"Second, despite its service record, and esprit de corps, the VDV can be seen as an anachronism: yet another piece of Soviet inheritance that Russians might qualify as a “briefcase without a handle”. Rather than parachuting into battle, in practice the VDV has spent most of its time in the role of motor rifle units on lightly armored vehicles. Allegedly, at one point during the New Look reforms, then Minister of Defense Anatoly Serdyukov and then Chief of General Staff Nikolai Makarov even considered cutting the entire combat arm and handing it over to the land forces"
Remove the Z from your username
there
it's a bit contradictory to the not a weirdo part

Thx 

also gib answer pls
Depends on the size
DDs
Burke?

Burke will surpass Perry numbers around this August
Yeah the burkes have been building up for a long time
It's all we really have anymore
That said in terms of production rate the 052Ds are getting turned out like sausages
we call em dumplings
also saw a group of 5 054Bs being built

Wuz that
a leo 2a4 decked out in kontakt-1
chonked
dammit
i thought it looked off but dach told me it was an actual thing
its coming though
god help us all, its coming
MLC70 L2A4 
Kontakt Plane
No way Korea offload their backbone
speaking of korea
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
When did they reattach the Indonesian flag decal? 
recessed pylons until block 3 has actual internal bays
sweet jesus this flayed my brain
y'all have meltdowns when felons have rivets exposed for maintenance in pictures but this isn't what gets laughed at?

Weren’t they wood screws
And this is a weird altitude to be performing maintenance at
probably because its not meant to be a fifth gen
4.5 gen since its best described as inbetween a fifth gen and a fourth gen
typically you only bother actually filling the gaps when on actual deployment
not fucking around in airbases/prototype testing
Idk what's with wood screws, that's just standard countersunk screws. A lot of aircraft use them 
Unless there's someone actually showing them using self taper screws
theres no point even really like... trying to pretend to be a stealth jet at that point
or going with the early production at all
I mean compared to like
because they're just comedically shit compared to the later ones
every other 4.5 gen its gonna have the best RCS values
i cant wrap my brain around
generally KF-21 is lacking in quite a few areas
"lets do two batches that cannot into stealth and then actually do internal bays after"
why are you wasting money like this 
such as you know
what the fuck
no internal weapons pod
and no internal loads
same time its a 4.5 gen not being marketed as a fifth gen
for what it is its gonna likely have the best RCS values for a 4.5 gen
Also last I checked the South Koreans aren’t going around yelling
“THE KF-21 STRIKES FEAR INTO THE HEART OF THE WEST”
probably because there still perfecting the bays
But can the kf beat a tomcat

internal bays can be problematic at times so not surprising
Yeah the fuselage is literally
if you haven't perfected them then DONT START SERIAL PRODUCTION 
Designed to be able to accommodate bays later on
I'm pretty sure
the Koreans would want KF-21s with external hardpoints
over F-4s and F-5s
alright gotta hop into a call now, so gotta cut my mental breakdown short
Also horse it bears in mind that like
idk the YF-23 had nightmare level issues with its internal bay so
Wasting money
Is kind of incentivized in any military
Not just the military, in fact
its down to getting a aircraft into service as soon as possible that you can add additional capability to later
I mean it actually does make sense to go
Militaries love wasting money
“Hey we haven’t worked this out yet, but we’re working on it and it’ll be incorporated into a future upgrade”
That’s most military projects though isn’t it?
“In the meantime let’s get a base model into production to start warming up the production lines and get something into our hangars”
B-21 ahead of schedule and on budget
Building local production capability is valid reason tbf
For example I also laugh my ass at Arjun, but it isn't a bad project for India
Minus the ultranationalist wank of course
Also yeah again the KF-21 isn’t claiming to be like
Convergent design
the super ultra mega 5th gen killer that will have all the west shrieking and crying
Not reflecting radar
Demands a certain shape
like the felon and femboy are
Surprising how hyping yourself up 3000 times a day has consequences
You either make it like F-22 or B-2
The latter won't happen on fighter any time soon
idk I like treating the crap like the Su-35, MIG-35 with some level of respect
And your wunderwaffe has like 5 units total
And you never even bother deploying said wunderwaffe
Wunderwaffle
Because you might lose it
I burst out laughing any time I see someone unironically pull out the
Like an rpg player hoarding his elixirs
F-111 unstoppable
💀
welcome back to: how the germans could have won wwii
well remember this is a country trying to pump out like
I heard something similar
But about the Embraer Milleniunm
Key word on
Trying
that budgets getting a beating
Also the cv dream I think is in the shitter by now
"The Millenium is better than the C130 Hercules because its worth 3 Hercules"
Because 130x3=390
Maybe they can grab one of their ten billion container ships and put a helipad on it
welcome back to the 15043254th discussion about this topic
Seriously, how does sk make so many ships tho
affordable costs with smaller ships making the bulk of navy
They perfected the modular shipbuilding, and mostly cheap labor too tbh
that as well














thanks for quick response







