#history
1 messages · Page 80 of 1
The rebels were defeated
Some consequences were like
The Marine Corps was extinguished for some time
@maiden citrus
wv44
WV '44: Secondaries with long range, improved accuracy and fast reload, improved heal (akin to Monty)
He knows
*she
Whoops
secondaries have improved accuracy, fast rld and long range
main gun sigma is 1.7 and standard usn dispersion
eh, colorado has 2.0
wv44 basically trades main gun performance for secondaries
Ship or Kansen
The lattice mast will break, not huggable
if the mast is sturdy, it will serve another purpose

Where i can find those photos from ships of brazilian navy?
Well
Usually the most commom source is the NGB website
NGB (Navios de Guerra Brasileiros [Brazilian Warships]) is a website that gathers info and pictures from the ships (it's kind of an old site still maintained)
But i've way other sources as well
That one of Aquidabã can be found on the Brasiliana Fotográfica
But recently i also have "befriended" a retired Admiral that have access
He have access to the DPHDM (lets say its the USNI of the MB)
And sometimes i can find "gold nuggets" pictures
Rare things
That's the case of that one
I dunno, but it sounds illegal. But it isn't
And there's some i found randomly out there
The MB have an Official Flickr account
Just found about how they modified the FREMM design?
yes
57mm 
I had already seen the FAB one. Awesome photos.
Thankyou.
The Army and Navy scrubbed their latest hypersonic test flight due to a battery failure during a pre-launch check, the Navy’s top officer for strategic programs said Friday. Vice Adm. Johnny Wolfe told the House Armed Services strategic forces subcommittee the test from the Cape Canaveral Space Force Station will get re-scheduled after the probl...

You're welcome
whats the fight of pearl harbour so famous about? i keep hearing abt it 
wait do you mean the attack on pearl harbour?
it's the attack which brought the US into the war
Surprised attack by the Combined Japanese fleet on the US fleet based in Pearl Harbor
eh japanese went and aggro us ppl? thats dumb tbh
You seriously asking that question?
There was a method to that madness
The goal was to damage the US Navy to the point that they'll take a while to rearm and built up
They stuck in a war with CN and in order to get more resources for war with CN, they go to war with US, Brit and dutch
While they do their version of blitzkrieg on SEA for their resources
whats blitzkrieg 
Lightning war
i have no idea whats that
Once they held these territories, they'd put up a defensive line to prevent the Americans from trying to recapture those territories
And the dutch rather burn their oil field than leave them to the Japanese 
is that why japanese ran out of oil
Ultimately one of their main goals for that defensive line is for the "Decisive Battle", where in one engagement they'll beat back the US Navy
Hence why the Yamato's were BIG, since the Japanese know they were gonna be outnumbered
Not really, USN subs intercept and sink many of JP oil tanker, like only 30-40% managed to get to the Home islands
it was worse than 30%
by 1943-1944 it was like more like 90% of the merchant marine for Japan
wouldnt it be better to build more ships rather than make 3 extremely huge ones
Japan again cannot outbuild the US
It still hilarious when IJN emphasize so much on attrition by sub but they completely neglected ASW
limited capacity
attrition by sub for main fleet but not for merchant marine lmao
They can’t compete on number so they have to rely on quality
i have no idea what attrition is 
weakening or exhausting the enemy
Slow loss of resources/life.
so basically picking the enemy one by one
It still isn’t an excuse for the complete lack of research or outright ignore asw
Slowly inflicting dmg on enemy overtime
Yeah it's stupid
then again, Japanese destroyers weren't "designed" or built for escorts
Mahanian doctrine and what not
i heard us subs done in a lot of japanese ships
Mahan will be the 1st to point out IJN completely butcher his teaching
only by around 1944
before then well
🚮
I forgot what the US Sub torpedo was but it was trash
something like less than 50% chance of actually working
When BuOrd finally get hard enough smack in the head and finally fix the torp, that when kill start racking up
whos buord
Mk14
Oh right
Bureau of Ordinance
Bureau of ordinance
aka weapons development and testing
Support on Patreon to help keep the videos coming https://www.patreon.com/historigraph
Videos on WW2 in the pacific: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLk2daSTx1RZuSj0Lg5wgLD75gXYGt44mb
Come join the historigraph discord: https://discord.gg/cjTaHFNAjS
Buy Historigraph Posters here! https://historigraph.creator-spring.com
Follow me on Twitc...
Interwar was underfund and staff by political officer who only want to win vote
this video summarizes it pretty well
ill watch it when i have time
thanks yall now i have to digest this like an actual lesson
Had IJN actually invest in asw and adopt convoy system, their merchant marine would have last longer
wasn't just not investing in ASW
as the video points out, Japan was running out of escort ships in general
they didn't have much ships smaller than destroyers and destroyers were too needed as escorts for the main fleet that they couldn't allocate them all
Also the fact that the destroyers that they did have were getting destroyed a lot
Well, running Tokyo Express is a costly affair
Oh, they did have light carrier for convoy duty and “escort destroyer”, problem is that they belong to IJA
Ah yes. IJA vs IJN classic rivalry
It also took them untill around the same time to learn wolfpack tactics.
Sheesh. I missed a lot. No, the IJN did not completely ignore ASW.
It's more that the combined fleet holds massive power in the "red bricked building" - Naval Headquarters, that the pleas of the smaller escort division tends to get drowned out.
More importantly, with the US industry spooling up to speed and advancing on the home islands - something had to be done to stop the US, perhaps inflicting enough to just get out of the war with a good enough deal.
With the defeat of Operation A-Go, Japan finally allocated more resources towards protecting its merchant marine - with limited success at times, and even managed to get a sub kill or two. Granted, that's a tiny drop compared to what the US is shitting out at the time. Hydrophones and radar according to the US Naval technical mission were already developed and used in training, and multiple kaibokans are being built.
It may be too late - as the US by 1944 is absolutely tearing up the merchant marine as said with up to 3,000,000 tons of shipping lost, but Japan is far from just "hurr durr muh combined fleet no escort needed" stereotype (that I often present as well).
Ultimately, if you don't want to lose the war at all, just simply don't attack Pearl Harbor. It was a limited tactical success,and in hindsight, a gross strategic failure that cemented the US' population's view to bring the war to an unconditional end, to the point of "hang the emperor".
They attacked the US because the Philippines held a key strategic position in SEA
Or, if you entertain that scenario, abandon the continental policy entirely (extremely unlikely given the rocky Japanese politics in the 1930s and internstional tension )
They assumed that if they attacked Malaya and Indonesia that the US would rush to the aid of the allies
By that time the US has switched over to the Island hopping strategy already
The fanciful notion of Zengen Sakusen (gradual attrition warfare) ala Tsushima is not going to work.
The poor conduct of the IJA towards US assets and diplomats, from the Panay incident to the Allison incident, also does not help Japan at all
Or really, the whole fucking IJA as the whole.
I forgot if it is Kaigun that argued it, Tsushima brought the Japanese navy to its most glorious peak, while also partly responsible for laying its foundations for its fiery demise 40 years later.
I think it might be, yeah
Go figure, I mention Tsushima and Riche shows up 
I can make a page long list of Japanese blunders at tsushima
Mostly gunnery related
I dont think the night torpedo attacks were that successful either
Also just sweep the previous Port Arthur oopsies under the rug
The mines did the heavy lifting
Ngl
Hatsuse and Yashima still afloat, yes yes
Mines were the least hyped part of the Russo-Japanese war at sea, and yet one of the most important new elements
Ikr
Mine warfare in a nutshell
Makarov dying to mines too
It’s saddening
In spectacular fashion
Not as glorious to drop a mine that'll sink something six months later as it is to exchange four or five salvos with a larger ship
Broke: deploy mines and sink a ship
Woke: load your ship up with mines and watch a CA blow your ship up with a couple shots
Always worth remembering that Japan needed to have two ACRs stand in for battleships because they lost a third of their battleship fleet to mines
You know who, sirene 
Izumo and Azuma?
Or Nisshin?

I only know the other way around, load a CA up like mad and then watch it explode after a dozen shots
Hmm
Nisshin and Kasuga were with the battleship line at Tsushima
Blücher, I'm guessing?
Nisshin got 3 of her 4 barrels sliced off by russian 12” shells
Yep
The ACR’s did well ngl
I forgot if its Hatsuse or Yashima that was nearly saved
One was blown apart quickly
This was the role that they were designed for, after all
The Garibaldi-class were intended to be halfway between a big cruiser and a small battleship, which is why so many had 10" guns
And no domestically built BBs at the time too as I recall
What saved the Japanese was the excellent build quality of their BB’s ngl
And this isn’t written about enough
For Italy or Japan?
Yeah
Wasnt until Satsuma they finally made their own
Interesting to note that in Kaigun, Evans & Peattie actually argues that one of the Japanese held out better may have just been that their foreign-built ships were simply built better than their Russian counterparts and were thus more resilient.
Tbh, Im not sure about the materiel situation of the second squadron at that point, and I dont mean coal dust everywhere or the exaggerated circus tales that were just straight up BS
What people think Tsushima was about: Japanese superior gunnery, skill and torpedo boats
What Tsushima actually was: waterline flooding, mines and the ability for IJN BB’s to absorb full order detonations
More on the seaworthiness of the ships - for a damn long voyage like so too, with no drydocking and the likes
oof
...odd argument
Going back to this, worth noting this arguably was rather important to Japan's success. They ordered mostly similar ships from the British, who could build them quickly (~3 years).
One imagines that if they had already been designing and building ships at home they'd have suffered from much slower build rates like Italy did - who laid down their first pre-dreadnoughts in 1893 and did not have them in service until 1901/02.
Id be concerned about their quality too, to be frank
Considering the later Fusos are...dunno, mediocre?
And not to mention Britian was already at the stage where building their type of pre dreads was perfected
Yep
Very high build quality allowed Japanese BB’s to absorb Russian 12” bursting behind their belt
Also worth noting that as soon as Japan does build their first BBs at home, the build time immediately gets longer (more specifically, the fitting-out process);
Ofc, this does show that build quality does not equal steel/armor quality
French armor on Iéna was tested against similar shells to those used by the Russians at Tsushima and the belt rejected penetration
Meanwhile in Italy;
But yea, going back even earlier, in general the Anglo-Japanese alliance was a great boon for Japan
Ofc in Italy's case availability of funds also tended to impact how much construction work could be done in a year and often helped draw out construction and fitting out proccesses
Designs, doctrine, training new officers, lots of things
Similar to French and russian shipbuilding
open NCD
they seriously believe germany will build a 176 VLS ship
How much did the Italians tinker on ships while under construction actually
I think it depends on the design, but usually not too much? There are only a handful of cases I can think of where designs changed substantially after they were ordered or started construction
The Garibaldi-class also let them experiment a lot with armaments
Open NCD
No IQ
The pains of laying down a pre dread in 1889, only for it to be commissioned in its final form in 1896
Hence why the early ships have a mixed battery of 152mm and 120mm, beyond the heavy guns, while the final form would use only a 6" battery.
I also remember the ruggiero di laurias having very long build times
While on topic,remind me how long it took to build the famous five predreads for France?
1890-1897
They were handed off to different firms as I recall, hence the drastic differences

Meanwhile french export ships built to the same quality being built in 4 years max

Yep, all the Italian ironclads had kong build times liks that
Gotta build them to the 1860 standards
I feel like people see the 5 Charles Martels and think they’d automatically lose to say, a Majestic
Come to think of it, Britain should have done the funny and ask France to send her four Courbets up to Jutland
Parry this now Derfflinger 
Shells that work and can actually burst inside derff
Imagine
Courbet might need a small elevation upgrade tho

Some delays 
176 (redditor double counted cells on the render)
(render is also unofficial, 2 years old, and NOT FROM TKMS)
Can i copy your last comment and post it under the one i screenshotted
Or you can do it yourself, same thread as comment you left
God fucking damnit I forgot that file was weird
This is what TKMS was showing off earlier this month
I'll hit it
Actually i just did it myself but i mentioned i stole the comment 
Plus i linked that image above
fair lol
Tho yeah i clearly remember that 2021 render from before
People were joking that that's where all the VLS from the last 30 years of german designs went

Yeah, it's from this article;
Die F 124 Fregatten der Marine sollen in Zukunft durch die „Next Generation Frigate“ ersetzt werden. Diese auch als F 127 bezeichneten Schiffe eröffnen zusätzlich Optionen zur Abdeckung weiterer NATO-Forderungen im Bereich der seegestützten Abwehr ballistischer und hypersonischer Flugkörper.
From JANUARY 2020

At least they didnt steal the Oto 76 for the brits again
Wait who's dis
Oh God
British super battleship Devastation and Soviet super cruiser Novosibirsk have been added to the game for testing.
British super battlesh
Project 25?
Hmm
Ok this is %100 percent comes from the projects that lead to Kronshtadt
Get Surfshark VPN at https://surfshark.deals/intelreport - Enter promo code INTELREPORT for 83% off and 3 extra months for free!
The Battle of the Bulge was Germany's last major offensive of the Second World War in the west. With the Americans caught completely by surprise, can the allied war machine rush enough troops to the area to halt the a...
Fucking
Quad 419s
When they add anson all the KGVs will do a fusion dance and become this creature
I wonder where that number came from. Were there some news/publications running with that number?
I swear it's far from the first time I see someone argue that she'll get 176 cells. Asked if they mistaken it with missile loadout (4pack ESSM?) or counting all kind of launcher (RAM?, decoys?) yet they're adamant it's VLS cell count....
It's because people were looking at this render and double-counting
That has 88 VLS cells
And has thus been haunting us for the past three years
That don't even look like Mk41
With so many of them claiming the same number I thought there were some mainstream media running with that number 
Or maybe just a weird ass echo chamber just like that two guy claiming Type 003 CV being nuclear
She be sexy
Lattice mast 
bruh
ngl that looked like some super stalingrad
Super Riga 
Italian supership never
yeah seriously this is getting goofy
technically if they count the release of the Soviet cruiser line and not Petro/the CAs specifically then yes that was before the Italian line
otherwise Petro was released like a year after
Euro DDs were also after the italian CAs
yeah pretty much
then again i would rather have a super DD than a super cruiser
frankly idek how they would do a super Venezia
going to 6 turrets or quad gun turrets would be goofy af and unlikely
and you cant really make a jump and slot like
5 Napoli turrets on it
and doing 4 Napoli turrets wouldnt fit how they do superships
203 to 254mm
I did
And I will do it again 
they could go the ushakov route
still 15 venezia guns but something fucking stupid
Tfw Ushakov actually has new guns but WG didn't bother making new shells
just slash the reload in half
like they attach an afterburner to it
or give it 30 layers of spaced armor so all the shells disappear to the pasta dimension
Barrels are /7 longer than Krem
ushakov is already broken as fuck
i mean i would rather have a super DD because the autoloaded 135mm is a fucking meme
you can just sit broadside in front of the whole enemy team and ignore them
venezia but with garibaldi's polaris missiles
Tanky ship is more tanky now ye
imagine Regolo but with half the reload and better ballistics
molest enough destroyers and you can nuke france with the f key
i think the italian super DD will actually lose a turret
and maybe base it off the refit CRs
isn't regolo's reload already like half of irl
using elbing for that piece of shit still hurts me
the only good ship class designed under nazi germany
lets put the name on the worst design they made instead
Which was for Tsar Russia 
Shit he means Type 39
can we get a french super DD with the quad 130s slapped on
like im giing to do in vb
based
If new Tier X Destroyer is Mogador with Soviet AA
Then make the Super a Kleber with Smolensk 130mm
kid named midway dive bombers
kid named thrasher homing torps
Kid named Trash
kid named i dont care
qwerty being as unwanted as usual
Unchained
does anyone know the history of the wows borodino (1950 small battleship) or what project number it was, trying to find more info on it
it's on her wiki page
Borodino World of Warships is based on Design III-III-3 by TsNII-45, a variant of a proposed “small battleship” project in the early 1950s.
During the development of the Project 24 battleship in the 1950s, the design work was handed over to TsNII-45, the Shipbuilding Ministry's warship research institute. This was to allow the previous design bureau, TsKB-16, to work on the Project 82 battlecruiser, a personal favorite project of Joseph Stalin. However, Stalin became displeased with the slow pace of the work and the increasing size of Project 24. On April 18, 1950, a revised TTZ (operational-tactical requirements) was approved for the battleship, which reduced the size to that of a “medium” battleship. The Ministry of Shipbuilding sent a copy of the TTZ to TsNII-45 for analysis. TsNII-45 criticized the design, stating it was one suitable for a World War II battleship, but not taking into account recent developments.
As a result, TsNII-45 put forth a counterproposal for “small battleships”. The idea was that two or three small battleships could fulfill the same role as one large battleship or several large cruisers. Aiding them in their role was the recent developments in radio communications and radar, allowing for effective “brigade firing” against a single target. Wargames showed that an enemy ship would suffer heavy damage before one of the small battleships did so itself.
In April 1951, a meeting of naval constructors was held by the Ministry of Shipbuilding to further examine the small battleship concept. The group proposed a 457 mm main battery, with a 180 mm or 220 mm secondary battery, which would fire high-explosive shells at long ranges, disabling enemy fire control or radar as the small battleships approached a target. The group also proposed a reduced number of main battery guns, to allow protection from up to 406 mm guns as well as a displacement similar to Project 82.
Finally, it was believed that enough small battleships could be built to allow for two or three for each theater of operations. The Ministry of Shipbuilding approved the concept, and TsNII-45 sketched nine variants of the small battleship project by the end of 1951. These designs were armed with 406 mm guns, as 457 mm guns were unavailable. The main battery was concentrated on the bow, to save weight. Accordingly, most of the armor was concentrated on the forward transverse bulkheads and turret faces, with the side belt armor reduced, as the ships would be fighting bow-on. In addition, most of the variants further saved weight by a reduced amount of heavy anti-aircraft weapons – only close-ranged AA guns would be mounted on the battleships. The belief was that the heavy AA would be more effective if mounted on the escorting warships.
The Ministry of Shipbuilding favored these designs over the revised TTZ for Project 24, however the Ministry of the Navy strongly criticized them. It was ordered for both the Ministry and the Navy to jointly study both concepts. No meetings to discuss the matter took place, however, and with Stalin’s death in March of 1953, all work on both the small battleship concept and Project 24 ceased.
oh thanks i usually dont read downwards because i dont find much helpful
awesome, project 24, thanks
Enjoy our video about the longest battle of World War II.
Check out our Patreon for a lot of extra cool Mitsi stuff and content!
https://www.patreon.com/user/membersh...
Subscribe to our channel and share our videos.
Follow us on our socials:
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/mitsi.studio/
Website: https://mitsi.studio/portfolio/
Behance: ...
nice animation
maybe not for kids though
@humble mulch can i post this
Several years ago, I gave a talk at the New York Military Affairs Symposium. It was a good talk, but it was necessary to re-record it. There's no Q&A, but the presentation has been updated a bit with more recent work and references.
The original, with the Q&A session at the end, is still available here.
https://www.c-span.org/video/?433629-2/de...
https://twitter.com/ConeOfArc/status/1636565888571670534
https://twitter.com/H00vJu/status/1636690969796984833
Go to https://curiositystream.thld.co/battleship_0323 and use code BATTLESHIP to save 25% off today. Thanks to Curiosity Stream for sponsoring today’s video.
In this episode we're talking about a frequently asked question, why is New Jersey longer than her sisters?
To send Ryan a message on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/RyanSzimanski/
T...
Watching it love the channel
No
Project 24 is Kremlin/Slava/Ushakov
Borodino's design family was a "medium battleship" as cheaper alternative to this heavy BB class
Concept was
Instead building 1 Project 24, you would build 2-3 Borodino style medium battleship instead
So when together, they would be strong as 1 Project 24
But this "medium battleship" designs were more expensive than a Stalingrad class while inferior to Iowa class, so the concept didn't lived long
Battlecruiser moment
"it costs a lot but still loses?"
is there a specific project number or name for this project?
im also looking around for the borodino that mounted 457s instead of 406s, not all that much info on that except that it was cancelled real fast when they didnt have 457 guns
Teddy leaves drydock
That's... an interesting angle to shoot the pic, trying to figure out in my head where that was taken.
Great shot of Mt. Olympus the brothers though.
it's not often you see flat on side profiles of CVNs, so i figured it was worth a post
Introducing the MCX-SPEAR, the civilian version of the U.S. Army’s new XM7 rifle. The MCX-SPEAR is available in 7.62x51 or 6.5 Creedmoor and coming soon in 277 SIG Fury. The next generation has arrived. The MCX-SPEAR by SIG SAUER.
Learn more: https://www.sigsauer.com/spear.html
SIG MCX-SPEAR FEATURES:
- Civilian version of the U.S. Army’s new...
killswitch is based
USS New Jersey (1944) vs Gloire (1860)
Despite occurring towards the end of WWII, the sinking of American Navy Heavy Cruiser USS Indianapolis is a harrowing and notable story from the war. Nearly 900 sailor's lives were lost due to the Navy being oblivious to the sinking, and the survivors were left adrift for nearly four days while fending off hunger, thirst, and curious sharks.
"...
such a sad tale for her captain
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Indianapolis_(CA-35)
That likely explains why every KGV class has different lengths, all longer than design requirements too.
Heres your plates, cut them yourself
this goes hard
oh look, found where the clownery started
Thanks Breyer ™️
pfffffft
The wonders of before the archives opening

@manic latch gaze upon your waifu's real form!
Did Germans assumed this from Sovetskaya Ukraina's hull they captured?
Breyer believed the positions of the hull and the heavy turret barbettes are correct
the rest are conjecture based on "eastern european sources" and aerial photographs over Nikolaev
presumably this
At least they have the sheer correct
Rest looks a bit....German/British.
Wish it was the Victory camo of Lenin but
She still manages to look sexy no matter what she wears
Ngl I find this secondary layout better 
Also, kinda sad to know that the magazine I used to read as a kid basically just took the images from this book, compress it to garbage and gave it shit proportions, then published it with multiple typos.
Still not sure where this clusterfuck came from, though.
GK looking mofo
Best part is that it is labelled as 1047.
Probably still better than the shitshow that is Gouden Leeuw.
No phallic-anorexic funnels. A bridge. Aircraft.
Yep, it's closer to P1047 than Gouden Leeuw.
It's #AwkwardMomentsDay. In 2014, the Portuguese Navy held a press conference with Portugal's defense minister to demonstrate their new drone. The event had an awkward moment when the drone was launched and immediately plummeted into the water.
713
116
I say the salvage operations after Pearl Harbor was a success
Nevada
🟠 ☢️ 
What’s the exp bonus
50mm main deck
Hey sirene
would it really be an american pantsir
it has those funny phalanx trucks, t-14s, lancers with nukes, absolute comedy all around
also no an American pantsir doesn't really exist
wiping lines with B-1 lancers
No one really goes with the same doctrine as Russia when it comes to air defense
lots of other countries have comparable vehicles the US just don't
CAS mad CAS mad
A lot of pantsir equivalents
It just made Soviet CAS more powerful
Obviously but gaijin needs to buff Soviets unnecessarily somehow
by making the best method to counter Soviet CAS much harder to do
In terms of actual pantsir talk
There’s not really any systems that offer a similar capability in a all in one system
yeah but the pantsir should be in, the actual change is they need to start shoving in those iris-t and mica trucks next patch
no CAS survives
yeah but those trucks
Are dependent on radars
And other systems than just the TELs
It's a twofold buff to russian cas
first all other cas get fucked, so it's a relative buff
Issue with pantsir is that it’s a all in one system
and other countries spawning in fighters to down them have to contend with a pantsir now

It can engage aircraft as they spawn tbh
also just realized you can kind of compare us spaa doctrine to us TD doctrine
Bad?
"make special thing to kill tank/plane? Nah, tank/plane can kill tank/plane"
Pantsir is obviously a precursor to HARM being added soon
that is not TD doctrine
my F-16 eating a pantsir missile only a mere 18 KMs away from the battlefield
welcome to gaijoob
idk gaijin just refuses to add things that make modern aircraft and helicopters actually survivable
it always baffles me why flares are locked behind a grind
Phoenix don’t really work too well unless your opponent is either in space or deciding they will fly in a straight line
that's like buying a new tank and the UFP is just gone until you grind that out
Pantsir missiles you can often dodge issue is having 4 of them flung at in rapid succession
but the meta is still "everyone hug the ground like you're lawn mowing in Kursk so the f-14s don't snipe you"
Why the tomcat isn’t 12.0 I cannot tell you
All I can say is if you have a bad KD in a tomcat uninstall
because Russian bias isn't a thing, it's just fotm milking
I’d be fine with pantsir as I said if they added the shit that makes aircraft more survivable
it's why freestyles can now out drag a mig-29, they're trying to set that up as the fxp whore
Such as EW/jamming, F&F capability for the AH-64D so on and so on
They probably need to eventually cut to the chase and just add early AMRAAM and R-77
pretty much
im not sure what the more grotesque air addition was
freestyles or the f-4s
f-4s just hordes every phantom toy under the sun while not going up in br because fuck you i guess
but freestyles have the most ridiculous energy retention known to man
I kinda want to grind for the Israeli phantoms
Since it’s rather clear gaijin will never give the US the systems they developed for their aircraft
Israel is likely my best chance for laser guided bombs
The Ford Aerospace AN/AVQ-10 Pave Knife was an early targeting pod developed by the USAF and US Navy to designate and guide laser-guided bombs.
Pave Knife was developed in 1969 to replace the original, essentially improvised Airborne Laser Designator (ALD) and TRIM pod (see A-6 Intruder). ALD was not a pod but a hand-held laser operated by the w...
The Westinghouse AN/ASQ-153\AN/AVQ-23 Pave Spike is an electro-optical laser designator targeting pod used to direct laser-guided bombs to target in daylight, visual conditions. It contained a laser boresighted to a television camera, which displayed its image on a cockpit screen.
156 examples of the original AN/ASQ-153 were used by USAF F-4 Pha...
LANTIRN (Low Altitude Navigation and Targeting Infrared for Night) is a combined navigation and targeting pod system for use on the United States Air Force fighter aircraft—the F-15E Strike Eagle and F-16 Fighting Falcon (Block 40/42 C & D models) manufactured by Martin Marietta. LANTIRN significantly increases the combat effectiveness of these ...
Literally never existed I promise
Isn’t American air defense doctrine just
“Well we’re going to have to bring the Air Force with us anyway so”
Plus systems like patriot and THAAD
THAAD isn’t really used for fixed wind shoot downs
Oh duh yea
As of late there working on expanding overall air defense capabilities with MML and other new systems
My brain included BMD in air defense
there’s also the like 4 iron dome batteries the army has
Holy shit Ryan is at carrier con
Then you’ve got the occasional phalanx
Since they are often installed at bases iirc
I’d roughly argue we should be equipping every air base in the pacific and Europe with a batteries worth of MMLs
I don’t know why but the table and folding chairs just cracks me up
Alongside picking up systems like SLAMRAAM/NASAMs
I forget, does the army operate that shorad variant of the Stryker?
yeah
My friend who’s deployed over in Germany is currently a crewmember on one of them
Nice
Yeah Osa should have been added instead Pantsir
I think China might get something Pantsir level tho
They do have many prototype of spaags
What about Type 625E
30mm cannon, 8 FB-10 missile
should of just given Russia a TOR
and called it a day
Yeah just copy paste it from Chinese one
"Prototype"
Not mass produced
ok ok
Coronet Bat was a 1995 U.S. Air Force exercise in which two B-1B Lancers flew around the world non-stop, dropping practice bombs on ranges in Europe, Asia, and North America.
A group of four B-1Bs was assembled for the exercise: the lead primary aircraft, nicknamed "Hellion" (tail number 85-0057); the second primary aircraft, "Global Power" (tai...
It's #AwkwardMomentsDay! During the National Day of Spain parade in 2019, a paratrooper carrying the county's flag collided with a lamppost. The paratrooper was left dangling for several minutes in front of King Felipe who is Captain General of the Spanish Armed Forces.
Admiral Togo with the Brazilian midshipmen of the training ship "Benjamin Constant" during the ship's stop at Yokohama in 1908.
#OTD in 2006, Somali pirates attacked the USS Cape St. George and USS Gonzalez. Pirate skiffs had chased a couple of small boats before opening fire on the ships with RPGs and small arms. The ships returned fire and set a pirate skiff ablaze with a .50 caliber tracer round.
944
166
Mitsi is fantastic.
Seldom does your humble scribe come away incensed from reading history. The saga of the World War II aircraft carrier USS Franklin constitutes an exception. We normally think of Franklin’s history as a parable about the importance of shipboard firefighting and damage control. It’s about materiel and methods, in other words....
Hey Krem, did the Russian Navy have any program to upgrade soviet era wake homing torps?
Type 53 is the common name for a family of 53 cm (21 inch) torpedoes manufactured in Russia, starting with the 53-27 torpedo and continuing to the modern UGST (Fizik-1), which is being replaced by the Futlyar.
With the exception of the UGST which uses Mark 48 style monopropellants, Soviet 53 cm torpedoes generally use electric power (since middl...
This girl will be replaced by this
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Futlyar
Futlyar (Fizik-2) is a Russian deep-water homing torpedo tested by the Russian Navy in 2017; it entered service in the same year. Developed by the Saint Petersburg Research Institute of Marine Engineering and produced by the Dagdizel Machine-Building Factory, it will replace the UGST (Fizik-1.) Futlyar is a wire-guided, combustion-driven torpedo...
gun
Knowing advances in sensors and electronics I'd be surprised if wake homing mode doesn't come standard (among various modes)
They are standard on Russian and Chinese one afaik, German and Turkey also have the same capability for theirs, not sure about US though
Since 2017 huh? About few decades late but at least something
Well I assume most torpedo development went to the Poseidon
what happened?
He berated the entire crew when he first take command in 1944 for failing to shot down kamikaze plane that hit the Franklin and killed many crewmen just days before, which make the bad morale situation even worse and give a bad impression among the crew.
When the Franklin was operating before it got dive bombed, the captain didn't order the crew to general quarter despite being warn by look out about approaching enemy aircraft. After it got bombed, he give confusing order about "non-essential" personel need to be move to the nearby light cruiser that was transfering damage control team and take in wounded from the Franklin, result in hundred of crew deemed themselves as non-essential and go to the other ship, while create confusion among the remaining crew, make them think abandon ship order was given. He then cancel the evac order and create even more confusion.
After Franklin limbed back to repair, he then round up the crew that "cowardly abandon ship", doing something akin to public humiliation to them. The navy did not buy his sham but they swept the matter under the rug and still give him a Navy Cross.
Ship surviving saved his ass
Yeah, had the Franklin sunk, he will be publicly flay alive
Tbf you can get a lot of shit going on as long as you don't get your ship sunk, or grounded, or running into shit, or making the navy looks stupid.
But the old 53 family still in production? Last I know, USN still consider them to be legitimate threat and develop CAT countermeasure against them.
Well Fizik-1 is their most modern variant ye
Fizik-2 will be the replacement of 53 family
He also refused the pilot's help upon return to Pearl Harbor and took helm himself, then ramming the ship into said dock....
amazing person.
yeah just gotta give it a kick
If it is NK then I could understand but why use Gyrocopter when you have proper Heli
One of the higher ups saw it in an old Bond movie
#OTD in 1945, USS Franklin was rocked by a series of explosions after two 550 bombs from a Japanese dive bomber crashed through the flight deck and ignited gas tanks and rockets. The carrier suffered 1,300 casualties but a determined effort by the surviving crew saved the ship.
it looks like a cool thing to go out joyriding with the boys
"Eh fuck it,It worked in the movies its gonna work in real life"-PLA higher up,probaly
Does anyone know why Takao's eyesight is said to be poor in game? I tried searching around but couldn't find any reason. She had radar (although Japanese radar, but still) and succesfully participated in night time battles, so her having bad eyesight does not immediately make sense to me
Maybe #al-lore knows
The single and twin mountings on Émile Bertin were all fed from the same magazine. This magazine had a single hoist that could supply 20 rounds per minute, an inadequate supply for even two guns let alone the four that she carried. This hoist ended on the upper deck and the rounds had to be carried by hand to the mountings. From the photograph above, it does not appear that there was any ready round stowage close to the mountings to supplement the supply from the hoist.

that explains why i need to take six years to remove the rof debuffs

Yall so like
whats the difference between all the F-16 Blocks n shit
like Block 10 and 20
Yes
F-16.net already covers all of them
In absurd detail

Kek
French AA in the 30’s moment
20 rds per minute for 1200 rds magazine, they really plan for an hour long engagement
yis
you see if you shoot very slowly but constantly you'll give the pilot anxiety
I will take all of your armor and shells away
I guess that's one way to do things
rich will strip your ship mid combat in a blur like a popeye cartoon
AA in the '30s is in general a very funny topic
Nobody really appreciated how aircraft were actually going to be used/attack profiles, and just how hard it was to actually hit the things.
For example, the HACS AA directors in use on Force Z had a ~250kt speed limit. The IJN attack planes quite literally flew faster than the FCS was even capable of registering.
n what is perhaps the best-known example of the state of Britain's pre-war anti-aircraft capability, in a 1937 firing exercise, a radio-controlled Queen Bee drone, a converted Tiger Moth, was able to fly straight and level at 85 knots around the entire Mediterranean Fleet for over an hour without being hit by a single shell.

Next step is to just dump fire control for the heavy AA guns, and eyeball the shots with tracers
Or what if
We put the aa gun on a plane and then fly that plane really close to the enemy plane and then shoot it

Norinco Next Gen MBT
A Slide of Presentation Disclosed Recently from an Open Speech. The Lecturer Discussed bt One of the Proposals for PLA Future MBT - Articulated ONE with UGV/UAV-assisted. The Head Can Carries Infantries & The Tail Also Carry Loitering Munitions/Missiles
348
121
ngl the blue sign with the pic in a circle in the middle made me think first of amogus

Land trains soon
Wait isn't that just a land train
There are no new ideas under the sun
Eh, at least Swedish one was arguably a single system
the multi hull platforms like that just seem like a absolute nightmare to maintain and transport
especially if your throwing MBT grade armor on them
like everything you want to do with the trailer you'd be better off just tossing into a French style scouting section alongside the tank platoon
ah he's finally getting what's coming for him
Yeah
Hopefully they get the rest of them too
They can rot in prison for what they did
What he do?

Is he even actually charged with warcrime tho?
From the description it sounds like just for a crime, during war 
Tbf the term "warcrime" has been conflated with a lot of unrelated things the term itself is probably already meant something else different in colloquial use
He apparently shot an Afghan civilian
Civilian itself is surprisingly a lot less protected under IHL
Not sure tho, been long time since I dive deep into it
The last time somebody from here committed war crimes, the whole unit they were in got disbanded compounded with a lot of other issues in the unit, but most of the perpetrators themselves got away relatively scot free
Pretty much, at one point I even think an individual simply can't commit a warcrime. It has to somehow related to how a war is conducted, which at minimum involves an unit
“Peacekeeping” mission
End up torturing a civilian and photographing it
Is it even peacekeeping if you're pretty much on one side
Don't give him the benefit of the doubt mate
He's SASR
There's a lot of stories about those guys and none of them good

TBF peacekeeping is just a term to make war palatable. It’s still war
There tends to be a distinct difference between how peacekeeping operations are conducted vs actual warfare
@eternal veldt USS Nautilus plans acquired!
the NA sent along other pages with interior views, and even the updates they did in 1943 at Mare Island
Man it's scary to drive this thing
Literally becoming deaf willingly
Apparently, they've been mitigated somewhat but 
#OTD in 1922, USS Langley (CV-1) was commissioned as the Navy's first aircraft carrier. Critics claimed that the carrier was obsolete because it was too costly and vulnerable. A century later, the same is being said about USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN-78). https://t.co/66LQhXezDX
Friend took this pic over spring break last week
Will take a long long years to scrap it all I guess
they should honestly just take out anything radioactive and keep it there
it'd be a cool ruin to explore for the future
main issue is there's nowhere to scrap her currently
I'm a proponent of making her a museum tho that's likely never happening
Iirc they'll have to cut a hole into her to remove the reactor hence why she can't be a museum ship
yeah
Flex tape
there should be soft patches that allow for easy refueling, can probably defuel the reactor, then cut up the remaining vessel, and lift out the pieces through the soft patch holes, then build a plug in situ
but alas, I think we are full of big ship museums and I don't think we need another yet
yeah you ain't pulling up an entire nuclear reactor thru those
I don't really think it would be economical to reassemble her after ripping her apart to remove the reactors for obvious reasons
combined with the costs of upkeeping a museum the size of CVN-65 would basically be undoable without government funds behind it
implying you didn't read what I said..
Soft patches aren't big enough to pull a reactor through, we know that.
but they can lift the fuel, and then cut up the remainder of it to pull through, like the egyptians stirring up a brain to pull it through the nose for mummification.
Yeah I read it. Cutting up an entire reactor inside is probably not feasible
and yeah, likely still radioactive anyway, all hypothetical 😛
I mean
You would need equipment to cut it
which would need to be brought into the ship
and into the reactor space
they're probably not cutting it up as well to prevent losing parts of the reactor
that might get unaccounted for
I don't think the equipment needed would be large enough for its size to be a problem bringing it aboard a CVN
losing stuff is also a good reason
Ah. Apparently they don't remove just the reactor itself
it's the entire room itself that's removed
the entire compartment
at least that's what the nuclear subs that get decommissioned go thru
that makes sense.
I spoke to one of Nautilus' crew once while I was visiting her, he told me that the sections aft of the control room that are currently blocked off for public viewing are actually ready for display, plexiglass installed and everything, but its still technically classified so until everyone they feel is a threat catches up, its closed off.
we take the fuel out
and throw a bunch of boom inside the finish the reactors
then just patch it up
and boom
museum ship
M14
heinous
Lets all appreciate the Beauty of the G3
Sadly i havent shot it yet
Can't own that stuff in Germany
We have the Chinese blackhawks, Hong Kong blackhawks and the Taiwanese black hawks
Where are Macau’s blackhawks is the ultimate question
G3>FAL
Sadly no
Which way western man
The new us rifle is also a good one
Mcx
the spear
Yeah
It can fire .308
6.8 was the main draw alongside bringing in new firearms technologies
6.8 
Main draw personally is the XM250
Idk If it's better
.308 should be more commonly available
it has advantages and disadvantages over the M4
In terms of 7.62 NATO I don’t think we should be going back to that
Much flatter shooting
The army should have adopted .50😂
Leads to much better hit rates at range
The addition of standard issue suppressors alongside the new scope is likely going to be the main benefits of the new NGSW guns
You should let go of your useless biases ngl
I don’t feel like diving in the 6.8 debate since that goes all over the place
Nah German engineering>>>>>
Technically the sig spear is german
it’s not
Switzerland speaks German so it counts
The MCX family of weapons was entirely made by SIG US
Technically the G3 is Spannish



Teutonic engineering
Swiss and German branches of SIG basically had nothing to do with it

It’s basically three brother companies operating in three different countries when it comes to sig
What now
“The American company is SIG Sauer, Inc. Its predecessor SIGARMS was founded in Virginia in 1985 to import and distribute SIG Sauer firearms into the United States: Its headquarters were moved to New Hampshire in 1990. This company was renamed SIG Sauer, Inc. in 2007, and since 2000 is organizationally separate from SIG Sauer GmbH.”
hope you look forward to being a SIG beta tester when it comes to their civilian products
Don't worry, the Allies left god knows how many bombs in Germany, so it counteracts
Pew
The more I think about AP shells, the more they weird me out
Here, have this 800-1500kg block of steel, yeet it against carbonated and/or heat treated plates up to half a meter thick so that it bends open the metal like a piece of tinfoil
It shouldn’t bend it open
It first makes a crater and then plugs it
Bending only happens in very ductile steels unfit for armor
Well, depending on what you mean as bending ofc
It's still a mind boggling amount of force at work there
I want to get an MCX one day
But velocities that shells experience are an order of magnitude bigger than most velocities you see on a day to day basis
Not necessarily the spear but one of their MCX line
On the other hand, the right-side hole made under identical impact conditions, except for a lower striking velocity just below the NBL, has the projectile imbedded in the plate with only its lower one-third or so still inside the plate and the upper end of the projectile, again minus its AP cap and windscreen, projecting out the plate back at a small angle. The bottom of the projectile is a couple of inches (~5cm) inside the hole from the front surface. The projectile is wrecked (that is the only word for it). The hard, blunt, oval nose has some chunks missing and large cracks radiate into the body of the shell. The ductile and very tough, middle and lower body of the shell is split lengthwise nearly in two with the opposite sides offset sideways slightly. The base plug is gone, having been spit out like a seed in a lemon wedge squeezed over a glass of ice tea as the lower body was crushed and split apart; it is missing from the display, possibly broken into pieces.
From an Okun piece
If humans could throw stuff not at 100 mph, but say 300 mph, we would be able to penetrate some armors

Of a 14in shell vs 457mm plate
And my brain doesn't really like to imagine what the fuck went on there
You got the picture?
Ah that one
I got here some Austro Hungarian tests
See how big of a difference tough steel makes
Where the broken chunks don’t break off
Yeah once the shell has enough energy left, that bulge would simply pop out like a cork
The steel having reached it’s ultimate tensile strength
To bend 30+cm thick plates like that just feels odd
Brittle steels break
Yeah but does it feel weird to dent a piece of cardboard when you hit it with a rock?
No, but that's what scale does to the brain
Also not everyone has a shooting range for BB guns in the backyard
But tossing a stone is ez
You would understand better if you shot some guns I feel
Gunpowders are not to be messed with
I do have my hunting license
And naval guns have a ton of gunpowder propelling them
Enough to get a few hundred kilo chunk of steel moving at two or more times the speed of sound
Over only a dozen or so meters
The powers involved are insane
Mhm
I enjoy making scale models of shells and launching them at a sheet of thick cardboard or wood
They give quite similar results
at extreme range, sure
but that's like
the least relevant range for a service rifle
All soldiers need exoskeletons so they can carry m2 brownings for their standard issue service rifle
I mean, sure
but infantry combat remains an average of 300 meters and below
and it's just... one line still at that range
What’s the name of that new optic that makes us rifles able to engage at much longer distances?
The one on the xm5
That’s it thank you
Needs a sawed down carbine and bullpup version for trench combat
I haven't seen anything saying there's issues with Vortex's FCS
all I can really find is a Armytimes article that only cites youtube videos regarding the XM157
https://www.armytimes.com/opinion/commentary/2023/02/28/the-not-really-next-generation-weapons-program/
The author disputes the reliability of the Army's newest rifle and light machine gun.
"There is simply no rhyme or reason to Army rifle procurement programs. Problematic programmatic choices do not stop here, however. Another problem is the weapon sight. The Vortex XM-157, which may have critical components made in China, is most definitely not an ‘auto-aiming’ sight. For guaranteed hits, the shooter still must manually ‘ping’ the target. This takes back usable seconds and makes shooting 100% accurately on the fly, as envisioned under the program to justify the reduced available round count, an utter pipe dream. The scope is otherwise a normal scope." it's just a "it might be claim" followed up with complaining that you have to laze the target before shooting
The US Army has selected the XM-157 to work along side many new weapon systems including the X-M5 NGSW. This new optic from Vortex has a feature that ranges and calculates your exact hold to achieve first round impacts. The hold is displayed within the optic. The technology is incredible and we're excited to bring you this review.
00:00 XM-157...
demonstrates how the optic works so easy to go to
“It might be claim”?
What is that
" The Vortex XM-157, which may have critical components made in China"
its source for this
was a youtube video
I love that they’re like
“Ackshually it doesn’t auto aim”
like they were somehow under the impression US had found a way to give every infantryman aimbot
who cares about battery life when you can just keep the laser on 24/7
And also like
Anything that is simple enough to be manufactured in China, is likely capable of being built in a U.S. factory too
its down to sourcing the necessary chips and other items
Especially as more and more us factories now shift to war footing for [current event]
if the claim is true its not the first time Chinese made chips ended up in US hardware
this is especially a issue for older platforms
sourcing a specific chip that may or may not be in production anywhere in the globe makes a prime market for knock off or recycled chips to get into the US supply chains
XM157 from what I've seen works and does what its intended to do
in terms of talks actually in the article regarding the XM7

they cited another youtube video for it tho I already know 6.8s struggling against level IV armor so I'll give them the benefit of the doubt
https://youtu.be/BGL9wP8_-LI (the video in question)
Deals and other cool finds https://linktr.ee/alabama_arsenal
"This video is for educational and entertainment purposes only. All guns displayed off the range are safety checked and only displayed pointing in safe directions. All footage at the range is private range and the gun is handled by a Range Officer certified by the National Range Off...
mongol hordes make conventional European defensive strategies obsolete due to employing significant maneuver strategies
Chinese solution
let’s build a giant wall
"Civilian testing problems have, or should have, sunk the program already. The XM-5/7 as it turns out fails a single round into a mud test. Given the platform is a piston-driven rifle it now lacks gas, as the M-16 was originally designed, to blow away debris from the eject port. Possibly aiming to avoid long-term health and safety issues associated with rifle gas, Army has selected an operating system less hardy in battlefield environments. A choice understandable in certain respects, however, in the larger scheme the decision presents potentially war-losing cost/benefit analysis." holy crap he even cites the madman himself
https://youtu.be/lhFjUliSvVc
InRange is entirely viewer supported:
https://www.patreon.com/inrangetv
Special thanks to @illumined_arms for providing not only this rifle, but the ammunition for this test!
You can find them on Facebook here:
https://www.facebook.com/illuminedarms/
In this video we mud test the new US Army contract NGSW, the Sig MCX Spear in 6.8x51, otherwi...
(inrange has gone down the tubes as of late if anyone knows the drama regarding WWSD)
I’d heard one of their guys started beef with someone
its also noted that these aren't using the Army's AP round either
ah even in the video it does better than about 60% of other rifles when it comes to the mud test
I don’t, do tell
he got angry at Ian over the entire what would stoner do rifle project falling apart
alongside a few other issues regarding him
they do have this point regarding the article tho
"The fundamental problem with the program is there remains not enough tungsten available from China, as Army knows, to make the goal of making every round armor piercing even remotely feasible. The plan also assumes that the world’s by far largest supplier will have zero problems selling tungsten to America only for it to be shot back at its troops during World War III. Even making steel core penetrators would be exceedingly difficult when the time came, adding layers of complexity and time to the most time-contingent of human endeavors. In any case, most large bullet manufacturers and even Army pre-program have moved to tungsten penetrators for a reason, despite the fact it increases the cost by an order of magnitude and supply seems troubled. Perhaps Army has a solution, perhaps."
I'm not really sure exactly how much tungsten you'd require to keep the army supplied with enough AP rounds
Whoa. So it's a simple ask and you shall receive?
Yup, I found the reference number in the archive database, saw that it wasn't scanned yet, asked for them, and voila, a couple days later and they were sent to me in an email.
It has a few different interior layout cutaways, as well as the booklet of plans from her upgrade in 1943
It helped finally answer the mystery to
"what in hell is that rectangular box they added to her in the 1943 refit behind the gun deck?"
The answer is "rubber boat stowage"
Also the foundations they built for the guns is pretty 
Always makes me chuckle that Nautilus is presented the way she is in the game but compared to other subs she's actually kinda friggin' huge, and older than the other fleet boat girls by a fair margin.
Sheesh, a 6"
2023 Chinese Balloon Incident in the style of Ace Combat - Ft. Wiseman
BGM: Ace Combat 7 - LRSSG Briefing I
Composer: Mitsuhiro Kitadani
@shrewd pecan
THE PENTAGON – After unveiling a budget that wants to decommission 11 warships next year, Navy officials are appealing to the public to allow the service to move ahead with their proposal. Officials last week reiterated the Navy’s divest-to-invest approach, which argues the service needs to shed older ships to invest in newer capabilities and …
Big Iron!
Man it's always trippy to read old us/european battles and it's like "this siege of fort x changed the fate of this entire region for decades to come and was a critical turning point in the war" and you get to the casualty report and it's like 20 people dead in 3 months
i'm pretty sure people died faster when disputing over land ownership with their neighbors at that time period
US army casually forgetting the last 100 years of firearms development because... they can i guess?
cant wait for it to inevitably fail
This isn't even a "globalization" or even supply chain problem
This is just system designers being lazy to update the BOM
I won't be surprised if it was something as silly as still specifying 74S logic instead of 74HCT or something
this was for a article citing purely a youtube making a claim I can't see repeated elsewhere
i'm out of the loop when it comes to that new us rifle, but iirc the issue is too much emphasis on fighting body armor and sig sauer being bad as usual?
rifle itself is fine
it performs just as well as anything else
complaints are mainly with it being arguably a sidegrade
hit seems to disagree
its battlerifle vs assault rifle
overall the differences between the M4 and XM7 likely aren't gonna really matter in the grand scheme of things
where it really counts is the XM250 and the XM157
since the XM250 is a actual upgrade over the M249 and M240
tho if it actually ends up replacing the M240 that's to be seen
since I think the M240 still has a better MOA
It'll replace infantry M240 for sure
I can see it going either way
M240s likely staying in the coaxial role
tho I don't really think the weight of the M240 really matters when there gonna be in the weapons squad regardless
That's what I mean, M240 wasn't even ever suitable for dismounts
eh
it fills the GPMG role well
again its being used by the weapons squad so, more accurate suppressing fires over the M249
I still have reservation for that claim, It's one thing being good as GPMG or traditional crew served weapon
But when one is "shoehorned" into regular infantry squad...
yeah I'm not talking about it in the infantry squads
last thing I want to see is British style squads where everyone is carrying the heaviest weapon possible
still wonder why the Marine Corps dropped their squad level M249s
that went from 3 m249s, one for each fire team to no m249 at all?
One fireteam still carry M249 I think
The idea was that M27 can function as suppression if needed
considering the pathway they went with the M27 as the new standard issue
I'm pretty convinced it was just a way of getting new rifles over a actual M249 replacement
Well, if you sell the concept as 4 rifle that can do some suppression
instead of one dedicated suppression and basically the whole team build around it
yeah but all 4 of those rifles are a sidegrade over the previous M4A1s/M16s, lack the sustained firepower of the SAW and you could argue the effect would be better with 1 SAW, 3 M27s
Tho I wonder if there are some much more fundamental policy change too
Considering that marines got into such heavy configuration due to its deployment loophole
the marines wanted to give every rifleman an automatic rifle that could perform suppression
a light, automatic rifle is something they've wanted since 1999
because m249s are kind of shit and it was a convenient thing to ditch to get 416s
on todays episode of well armored hulls
compared to the older Merkava's
the IVs hull armor is pretty comparable to other western MBTs
its able to take most HEAT rounds tho modern APFSDS its obviously going to struggle against
Merky Merk Model IV is a lot better than the earlier merks in hull armor (oh yeah, it's merking time) but it's not good.
IV improved the hull armor quite considerably yeah
I was looking at it the wrong way
which is more a suggestion for a round to stay out than actual armor
well, anything 120-125mm anyway
The earlier merks were a trainwreck
sheet metal.jpg
This is the fault of the intakes and exhoost
You can also see a little flap at the bottom here, it's this
this flap exists to allow transmission servicing, and locks the UFP module in place.
A shocking amount of the Merkava IV's design has made it past the IDF's normally incredible censorship
do we have an actual measurement of how thick that is
ofc no
well i mean has anyone done the math using other stuff for scale
oh sure, but it's not really thick enough no matter what it's made of to truly matter.















