#history
1 messages · Page 72 of 1
the citizens will be more of a danger than the actual military
"ask not what you can do to the tank, ask what the tank can do for you"
the main threat are mainly the North Korean military, special forces and stay behind armies
a T-62 that underwent cosmetic surgery is better than nothing to be completely honest
no because that T-62s is now completely useless
the gunner and commander don't even have optics
how the fuck are they meant to operate
real
fuckers are more blind than a mark IV

when i'm in a blindness competition and my opponent is the crew of that new north korean mbt

for all we know, their soldiers all have knee problems from all that ceremonial marching, the moment bad weather happens theyre screwed
if north korea actually fights another war i bet they'll just spam chonma-hos and B-5s
i mean it works in wargame red dragon how much different is real life
in real life a B-5 doesn't eat missiles with the equivalent tnt mass to render them into individual pieces of scraps
Pvt. Kim of the ROK Ground Forces vs 4000 glorious chonma-hos of the supreme leader
25 point mbt spam enjoyer vs beta male 200 point super heavy fan
bonus points for spamming 5 point ww2 tanks
sorry but I'm BLUFORs greatest artillery spammer
⁉️ major skill issue on behalf of redfor
this match was just funny
scary
bro what kind of player loses a udaloy to land arty
need too much ridalin to stomach wargame, the pacing is awful
so this was in a 10v10 strait to the point match where I got bored
and just started killing ships with my Eurocorps support deck
one combined barrage of 8 M270s and 8 M110s is able to kill most ships
tho most of my matches just descend into this type of crap
god I love base rushing with rooikats
somewhere I have a screenshot of me killing ships with marder 2s
im so confused
really is the eugen systems game of all time
wheeled tank players spawncamping in the first 2 minutes
i wonder if the WMA301 is available in wgrd
It’s not
wma at 8.7 truly is a gaijin moment
You can kill that thing with 7.62
man the fuck are even my old ATACM kill logs
so many of my screenshots are just ATACMs kill logs
truly gods greatest missile https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MGM-140_ATACMS
The MGM-140 Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) is a surface-to-surface missile manufactured by the U.S. defense company Lockheed Martin. It has a range of up to 190 miles (300 km), with solid propellant, and is 13 feet (4.0 m) high and 24 inches (610 mm) in diameter. The ATACMS can be fired from the tracked M270 Multiple Launch Rocket System ...
ok, yknow what i wanna see
ww1 dogfighting games with semi auto pistols and rifles
One day, after our reconnaissance over Mons and Charleroi, Jackson spotted a German Taube machine. I had also seen him but we had done our job and I did not want a fight. Jackson was always bloodhirsty, however, and the following shouted conversation ensued:
Jackson: 'Look, old boy!'
Me: 'Yes, I know.’
Jackson: ‘I think we ought to go for him, old boy.’
Me: 'Better get home with your report.'
Jackson: 'I think we ought to go for him, old boy.'
Me: 'All right.' "
"I changed course for him and, as we passed the Taube, Jackson got in two shots with the rifle. We turned and passed each other again with no obvious result. This happened three or four times. Then, ‘Have you got a revolver, old boy? My ammunition's all gone.’ I, feeling rather sick of the proceedings, said ‘Yes. But no ammo.’ ‘Give it to me, old boy, and this time fly past him as close as you can.’ I carried out instructions and, to my amazement, as soon as we got opposite the Taube, Jackson, with my Army issue revolver grasped by the barrel, threw it at the Taube's propeller. Of course it missed and then, honour satisfied, we turned for home. "
an excerpt from what is probably the most appalling frontend i have ever seen in my life
Historic Arms Resource Centre facility for British and Commonwealth Enfield and other Miniature calibre training and small-bore TARGET RIFLES
(BSA- Birmingham Small Arms Co.), conversion units and accessories with representation of other nations' training rifles, plus Postal League competitions for those collecting and shooting such rifles
even fully zoomed out, there are some sections of text not readable
training zeppelin targets for rifled airmen
yea bc it’s a 20mm grenade launcher with a rifle bolted on underneath
900 dock space 
Nah
It's a....lengthened T-72 with lot of cosmetics
Wish they didn't put the smoke launchers there since it shows that "Abrams Cheek" is hollow at back
they don't really have that many T-72s compared to their T-62 developments
additionally it wouldn't be the first T-62 they modified the running gear first
That makes sense too I guess
the Ch'ŏnma-ho has one less roadwheel compared to the 6 on the standard T-62
lemme correct myself (I woke myself up after I got like 20 notifications for bidens surprise visit to Ukraine)
its the other way around
Wrong. Teamkill is disabled so Javelins can't hurt Abrams 
Ch'ŏnma-ho got a additional one in later versions
Yeah more wheels
Nah Man White house can't lie. Surely it's Poland 
no he's in Kyiv
tho the M2020s just
all over the place
in terms of influences
as I mentioned earlier
the gunner and commander literally have method of looking outside of the tank
I thinks optics are fake
Wish they didn't close those
If they are real of course
they don't have a visible way of opening
and like if there unwilling to show off the optics
what is the bizarre ass steps of
"we have APS before we have thermal optics!"

Kinda curious they choose outside ATGM instead barrel launch variant, tho I guess it's stronger when it's not barrel launched one
multiple reasons
such as the kornet being actual able to kill most tanks in the South besides the like M1A2 SEP VIII and VII


tho for all we know there just plastic tubes but who the fuck knows since North Korea was able to produce a S-300 copy out of nowhere
I think these were the smokes?
yeah
now again
this is a tank I am convinced is fake
tho its notable how they manage to make most of the details look correct while not managing to make the gunners dog house and the commanders CIT actually look correct
🤨 also how the fuck is that RWS meant to work
New model but weaker than it promises
shits just a box with a AGS-30 on top
CIT also just seems off
in terms of placement
its right behind the gunners dog house
I can't actually tell how many people are meant to be in this tank
since it looks like a 4 man crew if the CITs right there
since the CIT is almost always placed on the opposite side of the gunners dog house
and I don't know why they'd double them up beyond the commander being there
are you saying that they're still making martini henry rifles in 2007?
https://utreon.com/c/forgottenweapons/
http://www.patreon.com/ForgottenWeapons
http://www.floatplane.com/channel/ForgottenWeapons
Cool Forgotten Weapons merch! http://shop.forgottenweapons.com
During World War Two, both German and Russian soldiers often thought that the other side's weapons were better than their own. In particular, both sides...
@maiden citrus
oi silver
you didnt ping me you bitch
thats Sydney harbour
Implacable arrives in Sydney in 1945 with 2,200 Australian Army personnel on board, having transported them from Borneo. (Author’s collection)
I see we follow the same guy
dont blame the messanger
Funny french man In DMs has spoken
this looks so much like a model kit
Btw this is for Tato
From deck?
Gojira awakens
Man’s the aftermath of a encounter between the USN and a alien cargo ship, XCOMs about to dive deep
Standards detected
does look to be the case based on bofors placement etc
Mercury 
Oh God
Saw the video of A-6's "crew sucking" incident of USS Theodore Roosevelt from 1991
Jets are scary
Yeah uh don't stand in front of the intake
Still fucking impressive he survived
Italian 75mm M 1912, IJmuiden
Looks sad
Well the Germans brought it over. Seems like it was treated like yunk
you know what's crazy
we still barely know anything about the helo the seals used to dome Bin Laden back in 2011
Whomst
It does remind me a Hawker Typhoon but it's not
fairey firefly
nah rockstar games ahead of the pack 🤑
just noticed the fact the stealth annihilator is marked both "MARINES" and "UNITED STATES ARMY" simultaneously
i had literally never noticed that before going on the gta wiki for my shitty joke
R* please fix
THE MOST UNPLAYABLE VEHICLE IN GTA ONLINE ‼️
Oh damn it was the Firefly indeed
But I'm curious about those barrels sticking out
Since some variants don't have that
probably 20mm guns
looks like a radar

most good fighters these days you run for the rockets
Hispano V has shorter barrels which don't protrude
@eternal veldt i recall there being a claim somewhere that buord was responsible for the battle of tassafaronga because they claimed that japanese couldn't build a better torpedo than the USN
i recall reading about it somewhere, but i can't find it now

or do you think jaba would know more about this?
closest thing i found was this
but i recall there being something about racial discrimination in that argument
which is the more important part of what i'm looking for anyways
Odd take, since responsibility of Tassafaronga also fell on the cohesiveness of the units (i.e. the Desdivs not working well with Crudiv)
But I dont remember that argument. Sorry.
well, tassafaronga was a multifaceted disaster
but one of the reasons was basically buord saying "those stinky japanese could never build a torpedo as good as the US! you're ok"
and then the captains proceeded to full potato
yeah but what i'm specifically looking for is a series of times the US's racism towards the japanese blew up in their faces
Complacency was what led to Savo, to be honest
"wHo HaD rAdAr"
And to nobody's surprise, McCunter was involved
dw i brought up dugout doug plenty of times in my writeup 
problem is typically the problems with US racism is limited to discussions on blacks, and the japanese internment camps
it's understandably a bit harder to measure such effects in wartime, but i'm 99% sure
That's obvious
what i'm looking for is times in which that racism had dire consequences for military actions
hard to say conclusively as it tends not to uh, end up in an after action report
im sure the baffling response in the phillippines at the start of the war had a lot to do with disregarding stinky asians being a threat
The entire Malaysia/Singapore campaign especially the loss of Prince of Wales and Repulse
basically im trying to prove to somebody that american hyper racism in ww2 did cause fuckups
godspeed
Well the war in the Pacific was started by the US so it's obvious that it was their fault
tassafaronga, i think, is one of the more provable ones since you have buord going "bro it's fine, stinky nippons cant build dildos for shit"
chad
something something brewster buffalo
u see
the us was actually going to back japan
but they're racist and figured chinese dudes were the same thing
and sent them all the fun stuff instead by accident
the japanese wanted to emulate american colonialism and to do that they massacred every buffalo they could see

"we heard you were fighting the fucking redcoats over something opium, here's a fuck ton of fighters"
"ehh...xie xie?"
eh, i'll just halfass and go with that usni link if ound

woke up at 3 today can't be arsed to stay up much longer
The Townsville mutiny was a mutiny by African American servicemen of the United States Army while serving in Townsville, Australia, during World War II.
About 600 African American troops from the 96th Battalion, US Army Corps of Engineers, were stationed at a base outside of Townsville called Kelso Field. They were a labour battalion and their m...
@frigid karma you may find this interesting
race riots, ofc
The Americans were security mad. Every dockyard worker on board had a rating allocated to watch him full time, and if he was welding on a bulkhead, he had two. One in the compartment he was in, and one in the compartment which backed on to it, both armed with fire extinguishers. As there were a lot of them, and they worked right through in shifts, they put quite a stain on our manpower.
The American Naval Authorities could not do anything about this arrangement as it was a civil law, and out of their hands. After much argument’ it was arranged that they would supply working parties to help with the handling of the re-armament stores And when they did, that started a real fire storm.
Remember we were in West* Virginia, the birthplace of rabid segregationists and the Klu Klux Klan, who were still, apparently alive and well. We had already found that public transport, restaurants, and every other public facility were plainly marked, ‘Whites Only’ and ‘Others’. So when the first working party arrived at the gangway, it was not surprising to see they were negroes, escorted by four white naval NCOs complete with side arms and batons.
When the O.O.W. refused them permission to come aboard carrying arms, in which he included the batons, he was asked, in less than polite terms,” how do you expect us to keep these black ‘B’s in order without guns”. The O.O.W. was adamant, and it finished up with a big con-flab between Capt. McIntosh and the base Senior Officer, with I believe, signals to and from Admiralty. They must have backed McIntosh, because from there on the work party arrived at the ship, complete with armed escort, who then turned them over to the O.O.W, did an about turn and departed, no doubt spitting and spluttering about the damm limeys giving the F**** black B*** ideas above their station.
These working parties worked with however many of the ship’s company could be mustered, but it took them a while to feel at ease working alongside, and doing the same jobs as ‘you mad whities’ as they called us. And they did work, hard. Perhaps we sowed the seeds of a cultural revolution, This discrimination caused quite a few fights ashore, and as the American Naval Police were so bigoted, we instituted our own shore patrols to work with them.
Jim I. Gallie, RN, (HMS Victorious from Mar. 29, 1941 to Sept. 12, 1945): Manuscript

Albert Einstein’s 1943 letter to the Bureau of Ordnance telling them their torpedo contact fuze doesn’t work and how to fix it
If you have to convince them, they're beyond the point of no return
Most operational failures, at least as far as Guadalcanal is concerned, were mostly due to captains still figuring out how to actually use the tech advantage they had afaik
like, having better radar but assuming its range is longer than it is, or not factoring in ships with newer SG radar into your strategy
BuOrd destroyed
Supports Healthcare= communist 
Correct
being charged over 1k for a emergency room visit right in the middle of changing health insurance makes you the type of person who want's to do a Johnny Silverhand against a healthcare company
Communism is when the government gives people healthcare and the more healthcare the government gives people the more communister it is. My plan is to use this money to give healthcare to every man, woman and child in the world and therefore force them to adopt communism. I will ensure that the government takes every toothbrush, every iphone and every stock market and burns them along with every starving Ukrainian. Once the Soviet Union stands supreme as leader of the worlds nation and the top provider of healthcare I will rename the earth to Venezuela and inflate our currency to the end of time. To destroy all of the small business owners and mom and pop landlords, I have my shagohad tank which will reign a nuclear fire on a new, red world.
The fact this is not a copy paste meme kinda worries me Spon 
most eventful day in townsville history
Least crime filled day in Townsville
this is probably the best place for this, anyone else see the news about Albacore?https://www.nbc15.com/2023/02/21/us-submarine-lost-during-wwii-found-nearly-80-years-later/
The Naval History and Heritage Command confirmed the identity of a wreck site off the coast of Hokkaido, Japan.
Yes
mhm, been out for a few days
Does Taihou have a bad damage control?
Inexperienced crew, yes
But they were not oblivious to the issue, and the crew was frantically trying to get the gas away from the ship as soon as they realized the avgas is spreading across the ship
People were shouting that avgas is everywhere, and the crew was desperately smashing portholes open to get as much fresh air in as possible
Though, it was allegedly a boot's contact with the floor that created sparks that really blew the whole ship apart.
The next itteration of the design came with bootless crews. Issue solved.
Other popular theories are plane landing sparks, sparks from smashing shit, or wire sparks
Ultimately unlikely to be ever 100% properly determined, much like Hood, due to catastrophic casualties
World War II or the Second World War, often abbreviated as WWII or WW2, was a global conflict that lasted from 1939 to 1945. The vast majority of the world's countries, including all of the great powers, fought as part of two opposing military alliances: the Allies (led by the Soviet Union, United States, United Kingdom, and China) and the Axis (led by Germany, Japan, and Italy). Many participants threw their economic, industrial, and scientific capabilities behind this total war, blurring the distinction between civilian and military resources. Aircraft played a major role, enabling the strategic bombing of population centres and the delivery of the only two nuclear weapons ever used in war.
Or just simply...train your men.
Oh wait, they're all dead.
It's almost inconsequential figuring out where the spark came from. It's a ship, there will be sparks from random things. You don't suppress the spark. The problem was that the fume is allowed to be in such concentration to be explosive.
Or, if we dive deeper, how the leak occurred in the first place
as there are some peopleTaihou's designer himself admited in a post-war academic conference at MIT that the welds around the avgas tanks may be faulty
oh, and before shitting on damage control, it should also be noted that Albacore's torpedo jammed Taiho's elevator; with avgas leaking, the utmost urgency should be venting that gas asap, but, in order to quickly get the second wave into the air, orders were to use emergency planks, tables and even chairs, whatever they have on hand to uh....seal the gaping hole shut so the second wave can take off.
Taihou effectively cornered herself into that perilous position.
lung cancer, anyone?
Is for me?👉 😯 👈
Thanks..?
You're welcome
Always learning new things every day
In 1939 things did escalate to becoming a World War in the sense of the word, even if things were happening before that
So it's... kinda correct? Ish?
Kinda how sometimes people argue about WW1 only getting the WW title when the US formally entered, because it started as the biweekly European head bashing
'war is cool, it lets you become an adult!'
“You're inches away from death every time you go on a mission. How much older can you be at your age."
1939 works best as a date because that's really when things kicked off into a high-intensity war fought across the globe
Otherwise, if you include localized conflicts, you end up with a series of escalating conflicts that bring you back to 1914.
i.e. the 'it was just another 30 years war' thing
Ex, if we count the Second Sino-Japanese War, then we can push the start date back to 1937 - but that was also local to Chinese waters and the Chinese mainland. And we may as well at that point push the date back to 1936 or even 1935, with the Axis involvement in the Spanish Civil War and the Italian invasion of Ethiopia.
Both of which were still pretty localized.
But 1939 is pretty clearly the point where the war goes so global that it's being fought pretty much everywhere.
And then there’s the fact that prior to 1941, the war in China and the war in Europe would be considered separate

Yup
The biggest relation between the two is some German support to China
Though the 'European' War already stretched as far east as the Indian Ocean and Pacific anyways, particularly after June 1940
With Speeeeeee doing her stuff, South American waters were also involved
And quite sure the raiders also went to the South African regions
Yup
Also after June 1940, the British are fighting the Italians in East Africa and the Red Sea through to the spring of 1941, and then you have Italian submarines circumnavigating Africa - and a surface ship escaping to Japan
Oh, yes, and then there's also the brief Anglo-Iraqi war in May 1941
🥞
Scheer gave the Dutch quite the headache.
78 years of the conquest of Monte Castello 
https://twitter.com/exercitooficial/status/1628026765296672770
This remember me of a story told by Lieutenant Cardoso de Castro
In 1939, he was embarked in Jaceguay (a hydrographic survey vessel)
They were surveying the Búzios Sound, and near Cold Cape, in the dawn quarter, the officer on the watch reported seeing a figure that initially resembled terra firma but as time passed, seemed to be a large warship, navigating on blackout.
The ship interrogated "What ship?" via signal lamp.
Jaceguay answered: "Brazilian Navy hydrographic ship Jaceguay"
But also asked "And your name?".
The warship didn't gave any answers, it changed course and disappeared
A few days later, the Battle of the River Plate happened
Cardoso ends the story with the question
"Who Jaceguay could've met? the British, that made that question with purpose of finding possible enemies, or the German, fearing that Jaceguay could be one of its hunters?"
interesting
And not so related
Could be very related, I'll look into Spee's diary later since I assume it's related to her, and see if they make a mention of that
Alternatively, the German ship met up with Altmark every now and then and she would definitely not want to get unwanted attention
I was going to talk about another thing 
That is not related to this story
But related to Spee
When Lieutenant Leôncio Martins was ferrying riverine monitor Paraguassú from Rio de Janeiro to Ládario (1940)
A journey that starts at Rio de Janeiro, goes to the mouth of the River Plate and goes up into the Paraguay river
Paraguassú made a stopover at Montevideo
Where HMS Ajax was also docked
Martins had the chance of visiting Ajax
I talked about it here
It's on the same book i took Cardoso's story
Brazilian Naval Tales
And here as well
Cabo Frio is on the red pin
oops fuck
wrong tweet
Gloire
razzle dazzle
i wonder if anyone is actually gonna buy those
it's a possibility
Egypt's considering the K2
with South Korean licensed production agreements there's plenty of potential buyers in the ME
K2 vs merkava?
more like K2 vs whatever war crime adventure the Saudis pay the Egyptians to go on
ah
"but it differs from the original version, among others: longer hull length, addition of another, seventh pair of road wheels, ammunition storage isolated from the crew, additional armor of the turret and hull by adding detachable panels of layered armor, and in the case of the drive compartment, a mesh and bar armor, designed to protect against HEAT projectiles."
they really are getting Poland the best K2

much needed reinforcements, thank you
there's not a lot of critical thought in that video but also
not a lot of critical thought in who i'm arguing with rn tbf
now a similar video on Otto Von Bismarck and how he paved the road for the destruction of the German Empire 👁️
Say
Why did Bismarck go this way despite experiences from Scharn sisters
They make the freeboard higher on Bismarck after Scharn experince but I assume it wasn't enough
Something something Austria something something concert something Africa
Did I get most of it?
throw in his hatred for the French and constant attempts to alienate them
the reliance on Prussian militarism
Redundant and pointing out the obvious
etc etc
You may as well point out he was from Prussia
true
Turns out rabid militarism whether under Wilhelm or Bismarck is a
Bad
Idea
Bismarck sadly got away with it and has his dick sucked because France went full pepega
Bismarck was just your typical setup of German Overengineering by overlooking the most basic flaws here and there and just making it end up into a paper tiger of sorts that only got a lucky shot on the Hood
@maiden citrus I've seen the R-class talk elsewhere, not sure if you have seen this gem yet.
poggers
Also, the British two-tone scheme on the R-class is fucking deadly. exceptionally good looking.
correct
http://www.patreon.com/ForgottenWeapons
Cool Forgotten Weapons merchandise! http://shop.bbtv.com/collections/forgotten-weapons
The US Army ACR (Advanced Combat Rifle) program was an effort to find a new type of infantry rifle which could increase the practical accuracy of the M16 by a whopping 100% in the early 1990s. Building on a legacy of s...
My first book is available for pre-order; check it out!
https://www.headstamppublishing.com/french-rifle-book
http://www.patreon.com/ForgottenWeapons
Cool Forgotten Weapons merch! http://shop.bbtv.com/collections/forgotten-weapons
The SPIW program began in 1962 with entries from Colt, Springfield, AAI, and Winchester. The first set of trials ...
In the side protection system, the empty bulge was outboard of the ship’s double bottom, which formed a water layer. Inboard of it was an oil tank, then the torpedo bulkhead, then an inner oil tank and then either an air space before a boiler room or a wing engine room without an air space. Water protection compartments were full, so in theory the ship’s side protection system was as effective as it could be. Oil fuel compartments were nearly full. Because no underwater attack was expected, side scuttles were open for ventilation, with light-excluding ventilators to maintain blackout conditions. Watertight doors were generally closed and clipped, except for some left open for normal harbour work.```
The third hit was abreast the boiler rooms. It collapsed the inboard oil fuel tank (inboard of the torpedo bulkhead), causing a flash visible at the funnel casing. There was no evidence, however, that the torpedo bulkhead itself had been defeated. The fourth hit was probably at the starboard wing engine room. It defeated the torpedo bulkhead there, probably because the oil tank there was full. It created a fine spray of oil, which vaporised and ignited, venting through the engine room hatches. It burned Marines in their mess. It appeared that this was the most severe explosion and that it may also have broken through the centreline engine room bulkhead.
The ship sank twenty-five minutes after the first explosion and thirteen after the second. The Board did not consider that closing the scuttles and deadlights would have saved the ship, although it would have slowed her sinking and thus probably would have allowed more men to escape. In retrospect it seems likely that the crucial factor was the presence of longitudinal bulkheads dividing up the engine room, so that a wing compartment could flood rapidly to create not only a sudden list but a considerable momentum. The official summary of war damage added that the incident emphasised the need for ships to be kept watertight up to about 8ft above the deep waterline.
The experience of HMS Resolution confirmed that a single torpedo would not have been fatal. She was hit abreast the forward boiler room off Dakar on 25 September 1940. The full depth of the bulge structure was wrecked over a length of 50ft; bulge compartments were flooded over a length of 80ft. The forward boiler room and some other compartments flooded slowly and initially she listed 12° (corrected by transferring oil and portable equipment). The main battery remained intact, but the secondary battery on the damaged side was damaged by the column of water created by the torpedo explosion. Forced lubrication failed 4½ hours later, temporarily immobilising the ship. The main lesson was that secondary flooding much increased the effect of the torpedo. A similar hit to Malaya (20 March 1941) just abaft the forward bulkhead of the forward boiler room destroyed 35 ft of bulge and flooded 100ft of bulge but caused less of a list (7°) and was repaired more quickly (thirteen weeks rather than six months, both in the United States).```
Something something centerline machinery death bulkheads
A 2022 ramp strike aboard the carrier USS Carl Vinson (CVN-70) that injured six sailors and resulted in the loss of an F-35C Lighting II Joint Strike Fighter was due to a mistake by the fighter pilot during landing, an investigation into the Jan. 24, 2022 incident determined. The junior officer had performed a specialized …
HMS Barham was hit by a spread of three or four torpedoes in the Mediterranean during a sweep by the battle force, 25 November 1941. The torpedoes hit between the funnel and the after turrets, causing the ship to list rapidly. Four minutes after the hits, with the ship on her beam ends, there was a heavy explosion, probably between ‘X’ and ‘Y’ magazines. The Board of Inquiry concluded that the torpedoes had blown in the side of the ship, causing such rapid flooding that she quickly listed to 40°, paused slightly and then rolled all the way over. The Board could not be certain of the cause of the explosion, but suggested that it was due to a fire started in the port 4in magazine, which spread to the adjacent 15in magazine. By the time the ship exploded she had already capsized. The officer of the watch on nearby HMS Valiant stated that all observers agreed that there had been three torpedo explosions, one and then two in quick succession, all amidships between funnel and mainmast. The general opinion at the time was that the big explosion was the 6in magazine rather than ‘A’ or ‘B’, as the centre of the explosion was abaft the bridge; the officer thought it was forward of ‘X’ and ‘Y’ magazines. ADO/PCO of Barham felt three torpedo explosions and then a fourth abreast the mainmast.
Mucho texto
Y u asking him? I made that vid
Literally using the worst sources
If you are referencing the seakeeping thing that shitpost is talking about, the Bismarck's were described to have good to excellent seakeeping. Not sure where or how the creator came to that conclusion
what guns would best represent the brits during the troubles
Sirene i used the most garbage source
if ira has their ar-18s
But I have to ask that for most of the things that meme is trying to tell, since the majority of the points are either false or cases of "so what"
Namely axishistoryforum
It crosses like 80% of my Bismarck bingo
That was the point

If I wanted an accurate vid I’d have come to you
i typically throw it against wehraboos because le flashy colors and meme music
I have to thank you for the headache it caused?
are more convincing to them than actual writeups

I made that shit in 1939
Please don’t watch it sirene
I had a stroke over it
God knows what the creator thought
Me?
But people in pop history love to think that it's all true
You, you probably thought of Lorraine
Ofc
But I will repeat
Most stuff in that vid come straight from one post on axishistoryforum

Quora version
Doesn't surprise me
Though that fella probably had quite some night when they wrote that post
Besides I no longer get enjoyment from bashing ships in history
These days I spend my time procuring rare pictures of lesser known ships
Like Rostislav with her office block
Also sirene pls forgive me


Primarily the L1A1 SLR until the SA80 shows up in the late 80s early 90s
If they do not have time for articles, they are not worth the brain particles
counterpoint
watching them cope is funny
Whatever floats your boat.
@chilly osprey https://twitter.com/RID_Difesa/status/1628305479683264515?t=DQN5SCe1EJrNZ6Wf91p4Lg&s=19
https://t.co/sOew8G3tSa
Sta prendendo progressivamente forma il design dei futuri cacciatorpediniere DDX destinati ad affiancare in seno alla Marina Militare i classe DORIA/ORIZZONTE attualmente in servizio.

13.5k tons with 96vls?
Lol
Post-war Britain gave us angled-deck aircraft carriers with optical landing systems, but also whatever the fresh hell this is.
162
96 is overkill but I hope it works out
Personally I'd drop to 72 and use the displacement for a better radar tho
That would require a better domestic radar to exist
Because i doubt they are buying from somewhere else
And frankly I'm clueless about radars so i have no clue on how good the Leonardo stuff actually is compared to others

Why not just buy SPY-6
American export controls
Buy CEAFAR 
Germans are already looking at widespread CEAFAR adoption
They've even got a testing radar set up
Domestic industry >>

CEAFAR is the world's best radar not because of its capabilities (which are exceptional) but because it's name is a double pun

you are nerfing the ship tho but fine
Holy shit
Tbh I'd buy American or CEAFAR if you want a modern DDG radar everyone else just isn't worth it and developing your own domestic radar design capabilities probably isnt necessary unless you're looking at fleet wide adoption
And export potential
Which is why Italy has their own 
I don't see Italy with its own active phased array systems

Yeah selex is under Leonardo
b-based?
this shall come in handy soon ™️
Nevada my beloved
okay so
TIL that the RN cancelled their CATOBAR carrier program in 1966 because the RAF convinced the government that it could cover the fleet globally using friendly airfields
and in order to demonstrate this
they moved Australia 300NM in their calculations
which was the only way in which they could make their point somewhat viable
genuinely the greatest UK moment to have ever happened

Budget slashing?
well it was basically budget slashing
RAF wanted the money that the carriers were getting
so they got the program cancelled
And RN didn't point that out?
I would imagine that RN would vehemently defend the program and pointing out that friendly nation can turn hostile real fast
of course they did
it led to the resignation of a lot of the Royal Navy's senior brass in protest
still didnt fix things
even first sea lord resigned
Oh, yeah, no, Italy is pretty set on the radar front
Ex, on these DDGs, the multi-function radar is Kronos Dual Band, which is a combination of Kronos Quad (C-band, AESA, subarray-level beamforming) and Starfire (C-band AESA, not sure what beamforming is like on that) with the Kronos Power Shield as the dedicated long range volume search radar (L-band, AESA, element level beamforming).
I just skimping over the 1966 thing, apparently RAF also lost bc they can't have new aircraft, the whole thing basically a sign of how much UK influence was lost during the time with general withdrawal from East Suez. That and the gov at the time was Labour.
yeah i didnt realise the Italians had an equivalent for AN/SPY-6 or anything similar
Common Italy W
Carabiniere and Grecale after WW2
Even more interesting is the second post war for Carabiniere, where she became a test ship and received one of the first models of the oto 76mm
Cute vehicle

It's centauro 
They also took a Gleaves-class destroyer as a testbed, the ex-Aviere, aka, ex-Nicholson
The rooikat is the south African one
Best 5" gun ever mounted on a US destroyer, even now

arent those the british heavy tonk
That's centurion
b o a t
So is this the same as well
Based
127/54 Compatto on the bow, 76/62 Compatto aft super-firing over a 5"/38 single
Never seen this

Or we modified it or some shit
Oh, it gets worse. In 1972 they removed the 127/54C to test a new ASW mortar. And then also put an Albatros launcher amidships for testing.
I douno
10/10 most bastardized American destroyer ever

What was the original MURM before the lend lease
Uss Milwaukee
They didnt gotta yeet her after the war
It's Omaha class
Destined to scrapped
How many light cruisers US has now as museum anyway
I actually don't remember...
CLG-4 - Little Rock only.

Most of the Clevelands aren''t worth the upkeep compared to the Baltimores in a missile age, and any 6" gun cruisers left were either sold or mothballed to death
Honolulu got it especially bad, since she only has a grand total of 2 pictures in her new 5"/38 twin configuration before sold for scrap for good

Even in the gun age the math didn't work out
The Clevelands had similar manpower requirements to a Baltimore, so they were about as expensive to man, but had inferior firepower and less reserve topweight for upgrades.
Hence why they reactivated the Baltimore's over the Clevelands for the Korean War
On the other hand, it's actually worth noting that technically more Clevelands became CGs than Baltimores in the Cold War.
For the Baltimore's, you have Boston and Canberra from 1952 to 1955/56 as testbeds for Terrier, but then in 1957 you get six Clevelands's converted into CGs - two with Talos, four with Terrier (completed 1959/60). This is followed up by three Baltimore's converted from 1959 to 1962/64 into Talos ships.
Beyond that it was all dedicated ships - Long Beach being the only 'true' cruiser, laid down in 1957 and completed in 1961 with Talos and Terrier - and then after that, all the 'Guided Missile Frigate' classes with Terrier that eventually get re-rated as cruises in 1975.
Stupid Ideas:IS2 turret on a patrol boat or Gunboat
This week Jonathan Ferguson examines one of several prominent female gun manufacturers present in Britain in the 19th century. Ann Patrick was known for high quality firearms, with this pair featuring a fascinating lock system that was ultimately made obsolete by the percussion cap.
Chapters:
0:00 Intro
1:30 A closer look
9:30 History
14:40 D...
Nationalist pride: +10 morale, -10 intelligence
I’d take it

check the funny shit I've sent you qwerty

I thought US killed this program
Or did they put on hold
to win de supah war de us needs uber space science
that intro line is so deranged it might as well say
"Winning could be just what's needed to win a future war in the air"
100 Morbillion $ project 
if victory is sure to result in victory then you must fight
Sun Tzu said that
And I’d say he knows a LITTLE more about fighting than you do, pal
because he invented it
Sun Tzu quotes are very amusing to me
Remember that his audience isn’t very
Bright
That’s why it’s funny
It’s the art of war not AP War
is that what i think it is?
Wow that looks amazing and like something wows should do
true
and even in their text they're still beating around the bush
ah yes it set the standard for all subsequent american battlesh- no? literally every bb of all nations after they figured out how this ship was built used this scheme
except a couple oddballs
being the first american warship to adop-
no
first ship period
Is this the all or nothing scheme?
Ok Maka saw the Nevada now delete the pics of the ex us dd used as test ship before she sees that too
all it serves is to make it seem less impressive than it was
What makes all or nothing good anyway?
More efficient with weight
Here
focused combat effectiveness by prioritizing certain areas and designing around others not being important to protect (don't put anything critical here, put it in the max armor areas), efficient armor weight and manufacturing (less thickness amounts), a bunch of different things
Thanks!
but yeah this reads incredibly downplay-y weird
like 'yamato had the biggest guns put on a japanese ship in ww2' style writing
The Type 93 had the longest range of any Japanese torpedo during WWII
Type 93 is the Long Lance right?
Yes
HMS Agincourt had the most main battery turrets of any British battleship
Today's video is a bit of a special one, it’s the FV201 Universal tank
The FV201 came about due to arguments and problems in WW2 around the infantry and cruiser tank issue, tracing its roots back to 1943. Immediately after the war, the first of the vehicles would be built and was revolutionary for its time, offering the protection, firepower, an...
Play World of Tanks here: https://tanks.ly/3jIOR9H
Thank you World of Tanks for sponsoring this video.
During registration use the code TANKMANIA to get for free:
7 Days Premium Account
250k credits
Premium Tank Excelsior (Tier 5)
3 rental tanks for 10 battles each: Tiger 131 (Tier 6), Cromwell B (Tier 6), and T34-85M (Tier 6)
In this episode w...
With the war in Ukraine showing both old and new vulnerabilities to the tank combined with multiple armies for various reasons additionally dropping their armored capabilities, while I think we all know the obvious answer to this question, honestly it’s a pretty worthwhile discussion of the evolving nature of the tank and how it copes with modern and old threats
(I’m not going to touch on politics here it’s just inherent you need to bring up armored warfare in Ukraine for this discussion) In terms of old and new vulnerabilities the war in Ukraine has shown the continued vulnerability the tank has to artillery and standard infantry anti tank weapons even with tanks that are suppose to have active protection systems (T-90M being knocked out and destroyed by a M2 Carl Gustaf)
And hundreds of Russian and Ukrainian tanks alike being destroyed by both gun and rocket artillery with artillery proving crucial in stopping armored offensives
Then you have the “new” toys on the block with drones, top down attack missiles, smart anti tank artillery rounds, and loitering munitions similarly proving their effectiveness in knocking out tanks in the hundreds
Now both sides are either improvising or adding in modifications to deal with these threats with additions such as heavier side ERA, Cope cages so on and so on
Overall making the experience in Ukraine more similar to the last time the necessity of the tank was questioned heavily the Arab-Israeli wars where both sides took atrocious losses from ATGMs and new infantry anti tank weapons
i mean the question is a nonstarter
this is just how protracted conflicts work
you... lose things
fucking shocker that
in ww2 you couldnt sneeze without finding a dead tank, or a downed fighter
or dozens of destroyed carriers and god knows how many destroyers
we uh
didnt stop making those
I mean its a given you will take attrition regardless but you had both sides in Ukraine taking heavy tank losses early on
compare it to other conflicts like the Gulf war were you had Iraqi armored forces taking massive losses while coalition forces took barely any
now there's always the argument of comparative troop quality, coalition superiority in technology, fire power, and well everything else
yeah that's why I was comparing it to the Yom Kippur war initially
since that was a conflict were both sides took heavy tank losses due to new anti tank weapons and changes in tactics
the concept itself is flawed, though, because replacing tanks with infantry instead doesn't really help even if anti-tank weapons exist
because instead of needing a several hundred thousand dollar missile
you can just take 9mm to the face
I mean I was more curious in discussing what's lessons are likely gonna be taken out of the war in Ukraine
fair shout
since in the Yom Kippur war despite the heavy losses tanks proved to be decisive for Israel
and you had both the East and West innovating things like the modern IFV, modern protection schemes, ERA and improvements in armored training
similarly in the war in Ukraine you have tanks proving decisive in multiple engagements and battles despite taking heavy losses
and you have Russia and Ukraine both responding to battlefield experiences with modifications to existing designs, field improvised armor packages and curious things like camo nets stopping loitering munitions
I mean just look at the T-80BVM 2022 where you have the dropping of the side ERA bags for proper ERA on the sides
or the use of anti drone nets in protecting equipment
similarly we have the M60 ERAs due to the Yom Kippur war
or the invention of the BMP-2 and Bradley due to the need to counter ATGM teams
I assume companies and militaries are looking at how to counter top-attack munitions
its going to be interesting what routes people go about dealing with it
whether that’s with a rcws like Rheinmetall’s KF-51 or some other form of APS
while APS is a obvious one the issue is dealing with the attack angles of missiles like Javelin
additionally relaying on just APS likely isn't the best idea so I imagine reinforcing roof armor is likely gonna have to be done as well
It would be interesting to look at the types of scenarios where Javelin isn’t hitting and killing
since obviously there’s gonna be a failure rate
there's some notable examples
I've seen footage of a BMP-1 eating a javelin and multiple other ATGMs and keep running despite being heavily damaged
additionally there's examples of post javelin hits not fully destroying T-72s and other tanks
I can see designs like the STRV-2000 where the crew is fully separated from the ammo and the gun being potential solutions
Then there’s also NLAW
So far stuff like the kf-51 and Abramsx seem to be taking the “just increase the arcs of the existing aps” approach
or using an rcws
and yeah while it’s likely neither of those tanks will go into full production, they do kinda serve as an indicator as to how the industry is thinking about these issues
I'm not sure about the RCWS solution
since that's going to need a lot of automation combined with potentially the addition of a radar
to where you have a entire CIWS on your roof essentially
personally its going to have to be APS systems combined with automatic smoke dischargers and some form of method detecting ATGMs in flight
since laser warning receivers aren't going to work against things like Javelin
tho regarding the drone and SHORAD issue
personally I think something akin to French style tank platoon organization might offer a solution
Pairing something like a Abrams platoon with something akin to a investigation group equipped with either AMPVs or JTLVs
with one or two of the JTLVs either having a protector RWS able to equip Stingers or the straight up 30 MM RWSs with stingers certain defense companies have been showing off
might be a potential solution
I think ERA bags will be just replaced with box ERAS as it should have been
Since those bags are very easy to get ripped
Just make robo tanks
no crew
yeah but that has a multitude of its own issues
What got me wondering on T72B3 2022 is those new manlet ERAS as number 2
Isn't it's very hard to hit that spot?
Kinda easy on War thunder but Irl it should be very hard
I'm assuming its likely from battlefield experience
Just cast a single giant ERA brick and put it on the roof
nothing really tells you where your tank is likely getting hit at than watching get hit in the middle of battle
'cannot be penetrated'
-photos of the tank being penetrated in that exact spot-
we knew it was bad, but not how bad
thats my point
oh yea
some of the IS tanks have holes in their damage model lol
Who would have thought
Anyway Now I finally get to see how Chals 2 will really perform
they shipped some?
They have this annoying reputation of resisting morbillion RPGs in Iraq
Will see how they will handle deadlier atgms
Imagine telling a time traveler that in the 2020s, T-62s would be fighting Bradleys
from the past or Future?
considering that was some of their historic targets
they'd probably think the US was invading another third world dictatorship
What's even maximum armor of Bradley
depends on the armor package
Best one
if it has the BUSK package decent for a IFV
not enough to resist any KE weapon, or many CE weapons
yeah but what IFV besides the ones converted from tanks or Puma are going to be doing that?
I assume m113 losses were mostly from Artillery
the problem with BUSK is that the coverage is truly appaling
Somebody explain to me what are KE and CE weapons
I mean the Bradley additionally is going to be more resistant to artillery splinters compared to the M113 or the BMPs running around right now
APFSDS and HEAT
But it only covers like a third of the side? Including the upper and lower skirts which are the main places that will be hit (from balconies or basements) in urban combat?
APFSDS is a kinetic penetrator and HEAT is a chemical penetrator

BUSK isn't terrible given the bradley's design, but it's still not good.
Also, BMP-3 is a lot more artillery resistant than the Bradley is - has much thicker aluminum all around.
yeah but there aren't many BMP-3s left running around
Isn't there like...
I was about to say
60 Bradley
Ah pledge
What’s the maximum size an auto cannon can be
additionally the Bradley's are a step up from the BMP-2s, BMP-1s and other IFVs ukraine is currently fielding
whatever your dreams desire
i know the exact one you're talking about and you uh
57mm?
you know whats with ammo that isnt in WT right
Or maybe you can push 75mm
do you count the HSTV-Ls 90 MM proposal as a autocannon?
also im pretty sure that spot is just a case of hyper super tight angle fucking with the pen
If it ain’t made it ain’t countin
the joke being we knew wt was trash for things like that
The Des Moines can be an autocannon if you think about it really hard
just not how trash
since if I recall the 90 MM and its autoloader were actually made
it was just never mounted in the HSTV-L
Ok so hear me out
then again, I forgot about bomber models
Stupid ideas:152mm auto cannon Bradley
bomber models are so atrocious it's hard to beat that
the biggest the Bradley has received is a 105 MM
ah yes I too remember how b17s snapped in half to 30cal
thanks wt very the accurate
The biggest autocannon is in 155mm
I though all Bradley had 105

i mean russia put a functioning 125mm on a bmd and put it into active service
you could probably like
The crazy mofos at Bofors have the record for both the largest autocannon ever built, and the second largest.
bodge on a fucking 6" gun from the mbt-70 onto a bradley
you could make a low recoil 120 MM work probably
The PE-8 taking 340 20mm rounds and bring fine
if you give enough of a shit to try
You vs the mpf she told you not to worry about
Sprut as 125mm?
Fair
yes
The 155mm artillery piece on the Bkan is a recoil-driven autocannon feeding from an En Bloc clip Garand style.
Alright new stupid idea
The turret looks like it’s from an early-war German tank
Or maybe that’s just the camera angle
the turret itself isnt terrible but the hull slopes do not work with that style of turret
me bolting the 8'' gun from uss hull onto a mustang convertible
which is a shame because they usually look great
Bkan could fire 15 shells in 45 seconds
We build a big ass grand of 400mm plus caliber
At maximum range, the entire clip would be fired before the first shell landed
Here me out maka
Take a Des Moines Gun
put it into a comically upscaled M3 Lee in the hull gun position
I like Mjolnir with twin 120mm
anyway here's why we need to make a fully automatic M110 for reasons
The second biggest autocannon is the Bofors 120mm L/46, used on both land and sea mounts
Coob
It looks like wallle hiding inside
and then place a worcestershire gun on the top, uniting the guns in holy matrimony
Alright guys hear me out again
(Other 'automatic' naval guns are in fact not autocannons. They are conventional QF artillery, that simply has an electric or hydraulic autoloader attached.)
We take a Nimitz class and we take most the shit out of it
We build another Gustavo
And put it inside
wave motion gun surprise nimitz
It’s called stupid ideas for a reason
What have I walked into
a lot of things
You know how the midways had a dummy secondary battery yea
Midway was going to have 203mm before they remove it for weight savings irrc
take a ford and give it a shit ton of zumm guns
Take a raptor and strap a 45mm for balloon hunting
Ram the raptor to balloon
nah you just add the naval laser for balloon hunting
Raptor already has a 20mm
stinky balloon skin will never stand up to laser focus
im still reeling from the fact the raptor balloon hijinks actually happened in real life
That’s some ace combat shit right there
you heat the air inside the balloon with the laser
Imagine you train your whole career to prepare for Russian Su-57 and then your only kill was a Chinese balloon
Su-57?
F22 wasn't for Su 57 lad
No the F-22 was intended to take on hordes of Soviet fighters
Raptor can have a balloon kill every now and then as a treat
why would they prepare it to take on a "fifth gen" with the RCS of a 4.5 gen
No idea
??
Never read it’s purpose
Plan you ok
During Vietnam the Air Force realized that statistically, the plane that saw the enemy first typically won
No
Tbh real preparation was Mig 1.44. Tho it doesn't look stealthy by looks so not sure what was the full plan for her approach. Things collapse before fruition 
I don't think
the MIG 1.44 would of had the best RCS values considering the RCS values of the much modern Su-57 aren't all that good
didn't it get revealed it has the stealth of like...
non stealth us fighters
tho of course the USAF was likely planning for advancements in Soviet Stealth technologies
Ye as I said. Really not sure what was the point of Mig 1.44 if it was created as answer to F 22
We steal it instead of making it ourselves
only real competitor out there is the Chinese since at least the J-20 can manage good RCS values at a front aspect
400,000 documents and help from B-2 engineer does help
oh god not genuine stealth jet discourse
the theft of technologies while it plays a factor
personally I think it underplays chinese domestic capabilities
It does help
I miss her 
steal good planes designs
and improve
🤨 if theft was enough China would already have a operational B-2 equivalent
and so far they have
Isn't H-20 can be revealed soon
Hey Im working hard on steal em rn
one good stealth interceptor
I wouldn’t be surprised if stuff like analyzing the (remaining) bits of nighthawk helped with developing their own RAM
and one rather mid looking fifth gen fighter in the works
its almost like the J-20 beat the J-35 in the JXX competition for a good reason
wait we calling it J-35 instead of J-31
%100 this guy helped alot on RAM https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noshir_Gowadia
Noshir Sheriarji Gowadia (born April 11, 1944) is a former design engineer and convicted spy for several countries. He was arrested in 2005 and later convicted on industrial espionage-related federal charges.
Gowadia was accused of selling classified information to China and to individuals in Germany, Israel, and Switzerland. On August 9, 2010, ...
As a design engineer, Gowadia was reportedly one of the principal designers of the B-2 Spirit stealth bomber, who conceived and conceptually designed the B-2 bomber's entire propulsion system and billed himself as the "father of the technology that protects the B-2 stealth bomber from heat-seeking missiles
thank homie
brb tech issues
Gowadia was also charged with helping to design stealth technology for Chinese missiles, and with money laundering.
the other issue is uhhh
you can't really reliably maintain your technological development on IP theft alone
since eventually your victim is going to grow wiser
Ye
and start punishing you for it like China is being punished for rn
Yea but we could use it to start off ye know
yeah same buddy
Ain't point is more about catching up however
It is funny though
I fully believe China has advanced capabilities and is a valid threat etc etc
watching the Chinese bomber renders start to look more familiar after the B-21 reveal
tho they're rn on the back foot when it comes to multiple key technologies
its probably worth noting that a lot of these technological gaps are
very overstated in their actual practical difference

Tho they do have unique stabilizers that can fold. If they keep it
the chip gap and other similar gaps are pretty major
I don't know if I'd say that, some are wider than people realize
the lack of serious air to air combat has turned the jet discourse into
the chip gap is huge
unholy rivet counting
or rivet-spotting in the SU-57’s case
The chip gap is not that huge, but I will not say more as we are quite firmly into non-history discussion
Someone correct me if Im worng
wait nvm those were wood screws
but
Canard frens
I remembered China got the Mig-21 from NK since the Soviets refused to sell after the Sino soviet split
and we reverse engineered it into the J-7 and later J-8
Correct me if im wrong
J8 is obese Mig 21 yes
How is the Agano's 6 incher comparable to Mogami's 6 incher?
o I love the J-7 with the pure amount of dumb things China has done with it
ancient jet fighter that has no right being modernized to the point China has modernized it to
Copium + being very desperate
yeah want a MIG-21 with Chinese AMRAAM equivalents? we gotchu
putting the technical in "missile truck"
hear me out

we Take a Decently sized ship
We stuff VLS inside
wait
nevermind
ranout of stupid ideas
Maka help me
I can't help you with that one friend
you get people who aren't politically charged
or are politically charged in the crazy way
but thats less ideal
👁️ I've showed admiration for both the J-7 and J-16
I think I fixed it
Why J-16
Wait I can't send wtf
being the best Su-27 variant tbh
Man the recent news with Poland reminded me that the Grot exists

“Fuck you”
Bullpups your Gro-wait what the fuck
Now Su-57 F-57 will be adored 
getting people to like something ussually entails hyping up a relatively unique or silly feature
something that makes it stick in the mind as entertaining or cool
fr tho what was the logic behind
Su-35s similarly makes pretty good upgrades on the Su-27 tho no AESA
“Hey we want a service rifle that can be set up conventionally or as a bullpup”
the export Su-30s are also pretty interesting especially the one with French avionics
Not in a nagging way I’m just genuinely curious
Su-57? what's even the point of that thing
It's hot. And has AESA
why does it look like a moldy steak
Fine I will get better graphics one
DCU on a Su-57
La creatura
la creatura
more scars for the scar god
MAY THE AR-18 AND ITS CHILDREN LIVE ON!













