#history
1 messages · Page 54 of 1
350, no? As the usual erroneous figure
350, my bad.
The gunhouses on the Montana model look like 5"/38 gunhouses because they almost ARE 5"38 gunhouses. The gunhouse is, within an inch or so, exactly the same width. The guns are mounted at about the same distance above the deck, and are (again, within an inch or so) exactly the same distance apart. The main differences revolve around the positions of various sighting ports, etc., and the fact that the Montana gunhouse is about 23 inches longer than that typically used on a 5"/38 twin mount. Overall length, muzzle to rear face of the gunhouse on the centerline is about 414" on the Montana mount, and about 319" on a 'regular' 5"/38 twin mount.

Literally speer himself
idk who speer is but he seems crazy
if you want a plane with a prop in the back, use P-55
also if the pilot bailed out wouldn't they just be fed into the rear propeller?
i guess the pilots just relied on anime logic 
I recall that there was a thingy that allowed the rear prop to bye itself
Quick, crude, check, there was an ejection function that'd blow off the rear prop and that upper fin as well
should have just invented the ejector seat like sweeden smh
You're speaking to a nation who thought rudder scuttling charges are a good idea
what does it do, just nuke the rudder?
Yes, on H-41.
what is the point of that
did the germans develop a swordfish fetish
why wouldn't you just scuttle the whole ship rather than just the rudder
Honestly, just learn from Italy
Triple rudder, if main one is jammed, the two auxiliary rudders can counteract
Oh wait, Italy cannot war amirite
On Bisko they were preparing to blow off the entire stern
But cut short by British battleships arriving
She managed to overcome it at the end, tbf
Just not exactly helpful anymore at that stage
Should've just done it like Eugen, and remain perfectly steerable despite a jammed rudder and a dropped stern
Have to consider that oigen is much slimmer than Biscuit
and I forgot the diary excerpt, how long did it take Eugen to steer herself
because one of the main factors for the rudder to fuck over Bismarck was short time and distance from Tovey's forces
Don't have it on hand, I'd say an hour or two until she got underway properly
Also Bismarck had awful weather, so I'm not being fair anyway
Bismarck was able to steer to an extend, just not into any direction with the weather present
EJECTO SEAT CUZ
Do-335s have ejection seats for that reason
i thought only sweeden had ejector seats
While SAAB did develop ejection seats during WW2, Heinkel did as well
They tested them on the He 280, and the first (and one of the only to during the war outside of one-off tests and aircraft that saw very limited service) aircraft to use them operationally was the He 219 on account of it's canopy placement
It's... a pretty standard destroyer
Very similar in overall size and design to the Type 052D/Luyang III DDGs the PLAN have been printing in absurd numbers.
Yes but 8 is a big number for a country like turkey
The original plan was for 4, with 2 more optional.
For a country where their biggest surface combatants are modernized OHPs and the rest is mekos...
Lmao
Anyone got any schemz of the Riche turretz? 
@spring briar

One more turret for my Dutch blueprints


There we go.

Cool monitor

79 years ago, RIP KMS Scharnhorst

Precious bote
Ugly
Heretic
Ugly not-so-ugly sisters
Play Crossout for FREE on PC, Xbox Series X|S and PS®5: https://playxo.link/theoperationsroom
Follow the link to download the game and get your exclusive bonus now.
During the allied counterattack to push the Bulge back, Easy Company, 506th PIR, 101st Airborne Division, must assault the village of Foy, but there are doubts about Easy Company's ...
How has popular culture affected the general public's understand of The Battle of the Bulge? Do excellent works like Band of Brothers risk enforcing myths that the battle was just the 101st at Bastogne?
Bibliography
Ambrose, Stephen E. Band of Brothers: E Company, 506th Regiment, 101st Airborne from Normandy to Hitler's Eagle's Nest. New York, ...
Smartest idea ever
Why not Flores or Soemba
The T88 HMC was a prototype SPG placing a 105mm howitzer into an M18. This survivor is at the Fort Lee TSF, the Ordnance Collection.
Financial donations:
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/The_Chieftain
Direct Paypal: https://paypal.me/thechieftainshat
Utreon: https://utreon.com/c/thechieftain
Merchandise
https://the-chieftains-retail-hatch.cre...
I love it
you've never heard the whirlwind quote?
search it up
yeah like all things considered
bomber harris' whirlwind bit is just the primordial "fuck around, find out"
nuts is an alright quote for ww2, but not the best one
Before we’re through with them, the Japanese language will be spoken only in hell.
this is the halsey line i'm referring to btw
nuts was the original "go fuck yourself"
thats fucking rad
you just need a special type of bomb
I think it was "What, again?" after the English commander heard that Van Brakel managed to damage the Thames' boom defences.
i guess they wanted to dehumanize the enemy
makes it easier to wipe out a tenth of the population
you can do 50% if you have Nuclear weapons
lemme guess, you consider dresden a war crime?

i knew the axis said things like that
what is dresden?
american air bombing of the city
i know its a city but what happened there
You never studied ww2?
internet says that dresden was a millitary target
Good
so i dont think it was a war crime to bomb it, yeah sad the civilians died, but they worked in factories that produced things to kill allies, so it was a target
Feels like the reason they say "history is written by It's victors"
its a matter of prespectives
@manic latch Happy new year.
Was browsing Warship International index, you probably already know this stuff but here.
It's the thought that matters 

Fisher been busy
wait wtf
Why is R.F. Scheltema de Heere under D
who the fuck does indeces like that
I have one question regarding this map. What's with the tiny US occupation zones on the British Occupation zone near Wilhelmshaven
Hamburg eh
Oh nvm
Bremen and Hannover
But yeah I guess they needed supply hubs since no land border.
And the Donau is rather... Curtained.
day 5 (akshually 7) of posting underappreciated Cold War Vehicles, VTT 323 with a 107mm type 62 MLRS
excellent
I've just discovered there is a "Germany" topic in Quora.
It's about as much of a dumpster fire as you'd expect.
Uh wha
Probably americans who didnt pay attention in history class lmao
I bet there is probably questions like "why didnt Germany mass produce the E-100 heavy tank?"
confirmed hitler supporters
well now, that's easy enough 
please tell me this isnt real please
i know it was never built, but i want to know if it was ever proposed
Why does that look like a b-29 body with 2 tails and props at the back of the wing
it is a heavily modified Me-264 I think, looks closer to a b-36
most normal nazi delirium
yeah lmao
i wish i could say that was their dumbest plane design, but i would be lying
Volksjaeger was a elementary school project
So little 5 year olds designed a plane for the luftwaffe
???
no i mean it was made of wood and glued together
i wish i was joking
Why don't you try Halsey's much more stronger line?
"KILL JAPS. KILL JAPS. KILL MORE JAPS." a banner literally flying high at one of the docks. 
Certainly some very colourful language from the man.
Well, I might get whacked for saying slurs
Yes it’s part of a quote, but mods are known to be trigger happy
Oh that’s……. Really crap
yeah they wanted a cheap plane that did not use up resources, and boy did they get a cheaply built plane
scrolling up and sees...
typical Quora moment...
yeah
I love the mosquito.
A medium-heavy-blitz-interceptor-bomber-fighter
RAF procurment after de Havilland told them what sort of plane they can build: We want all of them.
yeah the mosquito was really good, especially given englands past with inventing all purpose planes
Though my fav RAF prop plane is still the Hornet.
Mosquito's stream lined and lighter little sister
It's blackburn. I have nightmares of their planes
firecrest isnt too ugly, but not what id call cool looking
There is the bad, the good and the ugly of Blackburn planes.
And then there is the Buccaneer.
My second fav British jet plane after the Avro Vulcan
canberra is coolest
i dont like cold war bomber designs because lots of them are either shaped like dorito or b52
i like Canberra and gloster meteor designs more b-57 is cool too
But everyone got caught out by the speed of the early ones and high speed for heavy cruisers stuck, hobbling the balance of firepower and protection badly. The Pensacola to Northampton classes were disastrously unbalanced; proper glass-jawed heavyweights as Savo showed.
Ah yes, Savo Island, where famously the…Pensacolas and Northamptons were sunk…??
Moreso the issue is that the Astorias were sunk at Savo
the Pensacolas, known for being speed demons
they're just so unprotected at 102mm belt compared to the japanese 102mm belt
I also learned earlier today that Cleveland’s belt actually inclines outward at 6 deg
Not a huge difference, but something at least
interesting
anyone knows BB/C with three twin main battery?
renown class
Warspite post Fritz X

Richelieu after blowing up her two starboard guns in Turret II


ohno...
that's not even the right person, who's graysonic 
Can we get the rough parameters of P1047's guns from the 250t recoil value 
fun fact: in case B-29 adaptation failed, Lancaster was considered backup choice as forst nuke bomber...
Happy Holidays and News Years postcard for 1942 featuring "Minas Gerais" battleship
presumably something to do with the 65mm machinery belt and the 25mm machinery deck
or the barbettes made of sandpaper
unless you're actually talking about nawlins and in that case you know my glowing praise
nah, the pepsis, which do trade barbettes of sandpaper against turrets of sandpaper
but point being they're... not exactly made of glass compared to other cas built around them
iirc the turrets were also 25mm outside of the face plate, and the rear being a smidge thinner
which isn't really a knock against the usn
more just nearly every single pre-mid 30s cruiser kinda sucked
some suck more than the others
Deutschland my beloved
points at K
I want this, but worse, and make sure to claim it's an improvement
redeemer of Germany
Shitzig arrives
And then Spee
spee tho
Spee gud, but a tad over 10k

it's goofy as hell but it grows on you
slaps hand on Trento's 100mm faceplate
This bad boy can stop so many 6" shells
Would have likely gotten replaced with the tube, but well
Well, you can thank Langsdorff
I thank him for not going the Prussian way and burning the 1000 dudes below him with a futile way-home trip
Just saying, Im aware he's a good captain overall
And took the consequences for it
Even towards prizes
Opening up a copy of Jane's is like watching youtube without adblock.
100 pages of advertisements before you get to the actual content
You get some good advertisements sometimes though
interestingly, seems like the Japanese are content to follow this tradition - because some of my Japanese magazines are plastered with Tamiya's advertisements on the last page
Thanks for reading - Ya wanna buy a model?
No? Are you sure?
No
0/10 no advertising from Mitsubishi to sell me a Mogami-class frigate
wait harder Riche.
I love how there are two horrible tanks next to the best one in the world

Bt-7 wasn’t a particularly bad tank for its time
It just wasn’t used right during Barbarossa, since it effectively had to act as a defensive vehicle when its job is to exploit breakthroughs and flanking
Even so I don’t think it’s reputation is all that bad with the speed memes about it
Bitch why are they horrible tho?
Likely the view comes from the large number of bt7 losses in Barbarossa
Because putting a light tank in a defensive position with a 37mil is not advisable
Not sure why pz1c is considered bad
It’s a panzer 1

Not much to say there, just an early German tonk doing German things
the suspension of the bt-7 made it horrible to ride in, especially at max speed
i am not even sure what the panzer 1 was meant to be used for
It was germanys first mass produced tank as the name implies
It has machine guns as its main armament, it’s just meant to roll around and shoot at infantry
For an early 1930s tank, it did its job well enough imo
especially considering it was built with parts that germany was allowed to buy
I don’t think anyone would consider the bt7 or pz1 tanks bad at their intended jobs unlike latewar German models which shit themselves 30 times getting to the front only for a lend leased Stuart to shit on them in the side
was the panzer 2 any good?
why use stuart when you can use the best tank tetrarch light tank
no its just a meme tank because it destroyed the germans
strange definition of horrible
as long as you consider their service date anyway
yeah but the bt-7 was not very comfy to ride in ive heard it was horrible
most tanks of the time weren't
its got plenty going for it over contemporary tanks though
The real atrocity is the BT-42
Stop being a werhb and using really fucking weird metrics for what defines a good or a bad tank and then arguing on said metric
Elevated to meme godhood because of funny animay
well, no
he had thr panzer 1 in there too
Panzer 1 is basically a tankette
Yeah, like they had specific roles
So argue on the roles
Not like, how comfy their seats are
Comfort is a metric, but not the ultimate metric
You try something like the A38 you'd rather shoot yourself
Ones an Infantry support tank to fuck up people who don't have tanks, other is more a breakthroughs and harassment
it is a valid metric yeah
its just in a time oeriod where like
most suck ass at it
Like, your arm getting stuck in the tranmission level bad on the A38
dont get me started about the panther loader again
And the commander bumping his neck over every tiny slope
Based Czech tanks win again
tea ive told you about that right
loaders dont get a chair, and the station is shorter than the average german height
so
you know
I only like Panthers cause they look neat, I know they were incredibly bad designs
have fun being hunched over the whole time
think i'd prefer getting shot by an IS-2 at that point, at least its quick
Hell I only have a panther model just for show, I've never actually used it in my wargaming
Fifth gear popped out with tremendous force and could break the driver’s wrist against the steering leaver.
With an exhausted driver at risk of injury, the officer in charge called an end to the trials before they had even properly began and recommended that the tank be abandoned.
Tfw the brits went from this dogshit to Centurion in the span of 4 years
I have a Lee and a Stuart model that I'm gonna make this year and paint up as soviets ones so I can let my Romanians have them as captured tanks
That thing looks nightmarish to sit in
Oh it is
i mean
lee to sherman
its a running theme
who needs a pak when you have glorious 2 pdr 
also goofy shit like SMTs and T-35s into the KV-1
lads on tour
Bro I wanna do that with the boys
no clue where it was taken but if i had to guess its either 8th divvy in singapore or 10th on home defence
or possibly militia
Where are the Kangaroos?
shot
i should make one of those slander memes but with AIF divisions
yee i think i was tbhe first guy to point those out
its dope as hell
like honestly fuck the girls
fuck the lore
these sprites are the main event

i feel like the Churchill was the british version of the Sherman in a sense that there were many different variants used for different things
Cromwell is what you're looking for, mainly
matilda
Matilda gang
i heard that the matilda was the most survivable tank of the war is that true?
No
It had good armor compared to its contemporaries in the desert, but wasn’t too much trouble to pen for anything above a 50
Sherman is a really easy tank to survive in, but it depends on what you mean by survivable
Most heavily armored would be something like a jagdtiger
the Japanese soldier preparing to defend his homeland from the enemy invasion in one of the most extensive bunker networks on earth when some Australian guys with a fucking anti-submarine weapon strapped on the back of a tank detonates him half a kilometre in the air
matilda was excellent for 1940
in europe
by 42 it was very obsolete
20% of jagdtigers were scuttled because of breakdowns
fortunately it was just fine in the pacific
late war Germany moment
dont google matilda reliability rates
ive heard the matilda was the most reliable
matilda was unironically the allied tiger
wasnt it fast too?
very slow
oh
it's basically a fucking brick
and its reliability was very much overblown post-war
oh a guy called Tiger88 just liked my tweet im sure he's a very wholesome lad with normal political opinions
it seems any german vehicle produced in 1945 had a fair chance of falling apart, just looked at the reliability of the king tiger and... wow
youve got the explosive mass of a fucking pencil
even shitty HE helps, just wouldn't be a godsend
I’d rather have a 2 pdr he shell to fire at a gun shield rather than an AP shell that goes through and does nothing
couldn't the char b1 blow up any german tank of the era?
theoretically yes but the commander was too overworked to efficiently find targets
also why could the hull gun not move sideways at all?
seems like it would be a pain to aim
You gotta consider the range of targets that the 75mm could handle but the 47mm could not
what was frances tank for fighting other tanks?
Ft-17
(not really(
that thing looks like it is from before they even had tanks
Came after mki
And it’s technically the forefather of all modern armor
Yeah, the FT-17 is essentially the first blueprint for actual tanks instead of huge casemate monsters
also known as based
matilda-34-76
Rad
Captain D Michelson with a turtle named Tim. This turtle was the mascot of the 2/2 Australian Battalion
6th divvy gang
Sir please do not paint the tutel
🦆
So is the STAAG and the hazemeyer based on actual bofors mounts? can't find anything
ah
nvm found it
Thought it was american
No, please do
so this is a brazilian anti drone weapon
it basically shoots scrambling signals at drones
it's quite sexy
comment made
(scope is weird)
@delicate beacon
Hazemeijer Signaal was a Dutch company that did fire control and was the only among two exportin tachymetric directors. They were also responsible for converting the Swedish Bofors mounting into a triaxially stabilised mounting (Dutch no. 3) and later gave it fully independent firecontrol (Dutch no. 4).
Britain copied this mount in the Mk IV "Hazemeyer". The US only copied the Swedish mount (and later made a quad version).
The British first ordered 200 Mk. IV Hazemeyer mounts, and Vickers started with Dutch research assistance on a BUSTER mount. The British, upset that their best mount wasn't a native design, had their version of Bureau of Ordnance start on the STAAG mount. Initially this wasn't very succesful and way behind the BUSTER. What happened from 1942 - 1945 is a mystery to me but they both got delayed and BUSTER was almost entirely cancelled. Then postwar the STAAG showed up using the Anglo-Dutch RDF 262.
Speaking of AA, what was the idea for the sextuple bofors design? It looks so weird craming 6 guns in that much space
More Dakka is better, I pressume
Guys I found a cool water tank
wait this Castle Bravo or smth?
i found a cool water tank aswell
#OTD in 1962, the U.S. Navy SEALs were established. The SEALs were an extension of the Underwater Demolition Teams that were created after submerged obstacles had caused heavy casualties during the amphibous assault on Tarawa in 1943. Now, even sea lion pups want to be SEALs.
Then what bomb is this?
SHRIMP
No i mean the one you sent at first
The first one I posted was mk.41
The B-41 (also known as Mk-41) was a thermonuclear weapon deployed by the United States Strategic Air Command in the early 1960s. It was the most powerful nuclear bomb ever developed by the United States, with a maximum yield of 25 megatons of TNT (100 petajoules). The B-41 was the only three-stage thermonuclear weapon fielded by the U.S.

i cannot think of a single American football skin in any gacha
the lack of European ones is weird tho
Yes sang?
Cute shells
I'm afraid I will need to start touching grass for more info 
Why can't everything just be online
Need to get a good summary on the Bofors and Krupp companies and their activities with the Dutch navy first so my book is somewhat presentable
Yes

French ships
Ah ok
scope is backwards
cricket event theme for RN when

make sure vanguard is always complaining about losing to shrop and vampy too
Today we commemorate the 80th anniversary of the fall of Buna. This evening at 4.45pm the Last Post Ceremony will commemorate Private Sidney Thomas Duckett who was killed in action at the fall of Buna, 80 years ago today. https://t.co/2fKNieqPQx
Are these seriously just redone Shokaku/Yamato models or?
Scratchbuilding/kitbashing, not hard when you have the plans on hand
Though, I don't remember any Yamato preliminaries with casemates
Not sure if the carrier is Shokaku though
But i suspect the models are just done up for the sake of the film
Because they are.
Id rule it out as fake
The IJN was not insane enough to place 20.3cm mounts next to islands like the Lexingtons
This 76mm mount
Is peculiar
The fact they like
Cut the bottom frontal part of the mount
Makes it look weird
Also I discovered it's the only japanese warship class that uses a stealth mount instead of the old round cupola
This is an swiss soldier in an restaurant with his rifle and uniform
J-35 with Aerial Refueling Capability
so your telling me
it didn't have that capability until now for some godforsaken reason
Well maybe for being prototype models
Hmm
I don't think
35 on the tails aircraft means its the J-35 officially
tho
I suppose the US does that all the time with its prototypes
nah I'm just being dumb
👁️ I just hate there being multiple aircraft with the name J-35
J35 Draken
The Saab 35 Draken (IPA: [²drɑːkɛn]; 'The Kite' or 'The Dragon') is a Swedish fighter-interceptor developed and manufactured by Svenska Aeroplan Aktiebolaget (SAAB) between 1955 and 1974. Development of the Saab 35 Draken started in 1948 as the Swedish air force future replacement for the then also in development Saab 29 Tunnan dayfighter and Sa...
The aircraft looks pretty dope tho
I don't like it
combined with the fact
It would look better if two engines
Still not as cool as Viggen tho
its not the only aircraft in Chinese service that's marked 35
The Sukhoi Su-35 (Russian: Сухой Су-35; NATO reporting name: Flanker-E) is the designation for two improved derivatives of the Su-27 air-defence fighter. They are single-seat, twin-engine, supermaneuverable aircraft, designed by the Sukhoi Design Bureau and built by Sukhoi.
The type was originally developed by the Soviet Union from the Su-27 and...
....Is J-16 Su-35?
Ok
Su-27 is J-11
SU-33 is J-15
Fuck what was J16
There's no recent military channel?
no
Is using this channel as recent even allowed tho
it all gets directed here
just don't dive too much into recent politics
everyone got warned over the Ukraine when that was first kicking off
tho it was funny to see multiple people fail to see the obvious happen I will not dwell further from there
What is the best non-stealth multirole fighter and why is it the F-15E
I mean the F-15EX can actually
face off against the F-35 and F-22
and have a chance while doing it
F-15E possess the ability of both Su-35 AND Su-34 at the same time
It's crazy how all rounder yet effective that aircraft is
basic multirole capability go crazy
And here we are, still waiting PRC to make their own strike fighter
no reason why she can't pull off that mission set
Ok so
F15EX came to War thunder and you will load her with anti air load
What's your pick as numbers?
I don't even think
her full anti aircraft loadout
would be practical since I'd have more missiles than players in the match
J-16 is a Electronic warfare fighter-
Wait..how many hardpoint she had. 12?
kremlin she has 22 AMRAAMs
Isn't the J-16 the Chinese equivalent to the F-15E?

some hardpoints can carry up to 4 AMRAAMs
👁️ the F-14s full phoenix loadout is stupid since by the time you get them all off you're already in the middle of a fight with no maneuvering missiles to actually fight with
F35 can also do that I think
there mentioning Warthunder
most US strike aircraft can
and like
In the 1960s when the Soviets threated china with nuke and stuff
they decided to strap nukes on to the Q-5 attackers
👁️ do you really want the Q-5 as anything beyond gods most soulless to play premium
yes
The new F-15EXs boast updated cockpit systems, an enhanced sensor suite and data fusion capabilities, and the ability to carry up to 29,500 pounds of ordnance split into 12 air-to-air hard points or 15 air-to-ground hard points.
thats not what i meant
the A-5c is the premium
the Q-5 can be researched
nuke aircraft don't matter honestly
So it is indeed 12. But hardpoints can carry more than 1
Its historic
and I have no idea why anyone would willingly play any form of Q-5/A-5 that isn't the A-5C
B R O K E
12 AMRAAMs
F-14B, C or D?
They can be 22
yeah give us another tomcat
I need to be even more powerful in this godforsaken aircraft
Nope
We need J-11
@shrewd pecan help
F15 Ex has 12 or 22 Amraam?
It could carry only 4 if you want to go stealthy
D
In 2018, the USAF and Boeing discussed the F-15X, a proposed single-seat variant based on the F-15QA to replace USAF F-15C/Ds. Improvements included the AMBER weapons rack to carry up to 22 air-to-air missiles,
This come from the Air Combat Command web
Where H-6
What BR would she B. Given bombers are a death wish higher BR they go
8.7 or 9.0
usually whatever aircraft in war thunder has the most missiles ends up dominating so
Amber racks huh
you can probably imagine what the F-15EX can pull off
Yeah F16 dominating with 6 Aim-9L
Not really practical IRL, but it'll be dominating in game
your range and endurance tho would be severely limited
Chinese aircraft carrier when
Get a navy tree first
I mean, F-15EX is a strike fighter
There's no way in hell they will carry either all-AAM or all-air to ground ordinances unless they're fucked
it makes sense of interceptor duty but for no fly zone enforcement I have doubts on the endurance of a max armed F-15EX
remember the USAF's tanker fleet
They will use F-35 instead for full AAM loadout
Oh right
B-52 literally flew from USA to Iraq
her mission set isn't going to be the traditional F-15Es
Thanks to the tanker fleet
Hehe Boi
Yeah 400 KC-135s and 60 KC-10s
400 KC-135
since the F-15Es ability to be a deep penetrating strike fighter is becoming less relevant by the day
That isn't even the longest ranged use of the tanker fleet. That was the flight of B-2s to Afghanistan
F-15EXs main duties are going to be air space defense and cruise missile delivery
which went the long way around thru the pacific instead
USAF
Hobby: keeping old aircraft like KC-135 and RC-135
I mean
they are getting replaced by the KC-46s
tell boeing to actually make their aircraft functional
Isn't Boeing nearing bankruptcy
Yall saw a few days ago A J-11 went 3 meters close to one of the RC-135s in the South china sea
no
I honestly wished that the A330 MRTT was chosen isntead
there just struggling for a multitude of reasons
Well they did lose F35 and now black hawk replacement programs
"its planned service life, keeping some jets in service to at least 2050"
I mean I would of preferred the USAF would of just bought both KC-46 and lockheeds Airbus variant
KC-10 were made by McDonnell-Douglas
isn't the B52 fleet planned to be until 2070s?
Upgrade should take her 2050s easy
that Boeing-McDonnell-Douglas merger really fucked Boeing in the long run tbh
B-52 be old as fuck
No replacement was ever made weirdly
for B-52?
Ye
what is there to replace
Exactly
B-1A
There is no attempt
It's cancelled
But i don't think they'll make another subsonic tube bomber
XB-70 was too damn expensive
I don't really know why they went to produce B-1B instead
the B-1A was a high speed high altitude bomber
XB-70's design was inrelavant for the type of threat the USAF was seeing
the B-1B is kind of like the strategic version of the F-111, penetrating air space by low flying
and baseline lancer A was made redundant by the AGM-86
USA after they realized that cancelling ADATS was a grave mistake
they removed the back turret after a US HARM locked into the radar of the gun turret
iirc back in the Gulf War
That war proves that SPAAGs are still relevant, and even more than ever
I mean the biggest issue with ADATs is
what is it going to shoot at?
UAVs
The bloody autocannon
the 25 MM
that doesn't have proxy
that you also have a cheaper vehicle as a air defense platform
as a alternative for
like don't get me wrong I think ADATs makes sense for a Cold War Soviet confrontation mindset
Or else just change the SHORADs with less expensive ones or outright removing it
There's already M1097 Avenger tho
but for a post cold war budget and the global war on terror
Welp, at that time the UAV threat wasn't really proven tho
it looks like it built outta legos
So it's logical at that time
I do not think she would be at all relevant
for UAV or modern SHORAD work without a crapton of modernizations
Why people forget Leonidas
is this a bradley?
Why is there a gap near the tracks
Cool
Why is there a gap here
I ate it
Yeee
the lego brick fell out
Could the Bradley autocannon shoot UAVs properly if they run out of Stingers tho
the bradley has optical tracking for aircraft
that looks like a mobile radar system
its a anti drone system
idk probably within the next few years
Stryker Dragoon made it pretty quickly into service
same with the SHORADs
actually lemme get the picture my friend deployed in Germany sent
In a nutshell, it pretty much shoot "lasers"
Microwave
Yes
Yet
Considering it's already shown to public while still under budget is very cool
Imagine if it's the LockMart
Gib china naval tree
it could be like the israel tree
Does War Thunder still use ROC flag for ROC subtree?
yes
I mean last time I checked it still did
thoI could be wrong
idk the new F-16 in the China tree has full blown ROC Markings
This a Stryker right?
what else would it be?
Idk I suck at identifying vehicles at first glance
For sure
Stryker SHORADS
Indonesian-style Vietnam Gun Trucks
turrets are under the covers
Wtf is that a transformers logo on the front? lmao
Yes
Papua isn't considered as a military operation zone so it's basically cops kitbashing a civilian 4x2 truck
What Indonesia purchased last year
Hmm
You guys can get a vehicle for WT
I'm thinking the Harimau
Variant of Turkish Kaplan or..collab work?
👁️ generally put
I don't think warthunder needs any new tech trees
that aren't subtrees
since it takes one look at Israel's tech tree
yeah
I hope you like magachs
never seen em
because no one wants to play the same tank copy and pasted for a entire tree
God I wish IS-7 was mass produced and Israel had them
They would turn that beauty to next level
🤨 kremlin that is literally the worse part of the fucking Israeli tech tree
it is mid tank after mid tank
n o its beacuse i play tier 3
Upgrade J-7 into drones
A-10 too then
I took down a bunch of A-10s with My Mig-17as
there should be no more new trees
True
Next world war should Be chinese civil war
since no one can actually make a playable tree that's not just copy and paste vehicles
even like a pan Korean tree
is just gonna be fucking
copy and paste T-62s and M48s forever
To be fair China was dirt poor in the early times
Imagine South Korea air tech tree
Copy paste until KF-21
I mean
South Korea actually gets unique versions of the F-16, F-5 and F-15 at least
North Korea tree would just be pain and misery since you don't get a tank with thermals until what would essentially be its 10.0
tho
The P'okp'ung-ho, officially the Chonma-215 and Chonma-216 are North Korean main battle tanks (MBT) developed in the 1990s. The tank may incorporate technology found in the T-62, T-72, and Ch'onma-ho MBTs. Outside parties codename the tank M-2002 because the tank went through performance trials on February 16, 2002 (therefore being officially co...
kornet and MANPAD slinging would be funny
kinda useful in WG:RD
A2A refuelling has always been a neglected capability in Chinese and Russian militaries
Because We were Broke af
biggest countries on earth
Wonder if it could actually shoot
neglects air refueling
I mean if Palestinians in basement can make grad rockets
North Korea probably can
tbh i think its less a monetary issue and more an institutional experience + only become relevant in our doctrine recently issue
For russia, even their AWACS are as old as E-3
its been a major thing in the US since the 50s/60s
yes it's pretty important when you need to project power over huge oceans
also its inherently more relevant to a country thats fighting overseas than a country whose only real interest are direct neighbors + a fuckbillion air bases in range
not that it still isnt important
I mean its not just crossing oceans
cross-country transfers are a waste of A2A refuelling resources
its also amassing for strikes and other shit that need large amounts of aircraft in the air at once
Institutional experience is huge, Chinese and Russians previously only used a handful of modified IL-76s for A2A refuelling, Russia has never really expected to be operating far beyond the maximum range of its air bases thus a small unspecialised tanker fleet was considered useful since you had it when you needed it but you didnt need it often, and the army would just capture airfields as it progressed in an offensive campaign, and the Chinese generally followed this with some additional caveats since their main anti-shipping capability (a pretty important capability for a country with a coastline as large as China's, unlike the Russians whose maritime boundaries are quite localised) came from the H-6 which already had enough range to touch enemy task forces and didn't have A2A refuelling capability
Chinese Air Doctrine 1950's Be like:Run out of Ammo,You are the Ammo now
we aren't talking about the 1950s PRC
Chinese doctrine only really caught up to the modern extended-range strikes that have dominated Western doctrine for the last 40 odd years in the last 5-10 years thus they've been putting far greater emphasis on the tanker force which has expanded massively, they introduced their first KC-30 equivalent airborne tankers in 2016 but they still need to gain that institutional experience that the West gained over decades
On the tanker thing,They are converting a few of their Y-20s into YY-20 for air refueling
Y-20 already has an A2A refuelling capability afaik but a dedicated airframe will be better
so the modified YY-20s are definitely a step in the right direction
it's definitely a KC-30 equivalent in all respects being multi-role and having similar MTOWs
but they've still got to climb that learning curve
The US has that as well for the Hornet as a buddy system but found that it exerts a lot of stress on the airframe and drastically lowers the lifespan of the plane
give them 10 years and they'll be in a significantly better position in terms of A2A refuelling capacity and capability
Something like 1hrs of flying as a buddy tanker is about 3hrs of stress of flying normally
yeah theres a reason the US invested in the S-3
and then retired them without replacement
and then realised they needed the capability and tried to bring it back but by then it was too late
and thats how we get the funny stealth drones
I've read that at any given moment about 1/5 of a carrier air wing is dedicated to buddy tanking
which is a lot of planes
afaik a lot of the S-3 airframes were still below their max flight hours too
Wow then why the heck did they retire them
Even if they were kind of obsoleted as an ASW platform, repurposing them as a tanker would make sense
they were repurposed as a tanker
they retired them for a few very silly reasons
cost of maintenance was starting to bite
work to extend the service lives was not free
there was a replacement in the works (it never materialised)
the new stealth drones are gonna be cool when they enter service tho
Arsenal Bird when
still waiting on that first MQ-25 squadron

Unde, I need sources on the 76/62
The one that was on the frigate lend to the Dutch
which?
oh the SMP3
I live
holy shit
Did you not?

oh made by our resident phoenix
o/
depth charges can still hurt a submarine on the surface right?
Yes
Scroll up a few messages and answer my question I gave unde. 
They can hurt anything on the surface
Especially sailors.
Depth charges can hurt the dd they launched from so DDs go full speed
Hence why depth charge dropping at slow speeds was not a thing
*stares at Japanese destroyers Depth charging stragglers*
Infamously, at midway hamman’s depth charges killed many of Yorktown’s crew
do only destroyers carry depth chatges?
Nah
Light cruisers do too
Even some capital ships
Some cruisers and even less BBs did too
It's just impractical
But you don’t assign those to asw
BBs call in a magical asw flight that spawns a few hundred meters behind them

Anything can Carry depth charges. Its up to navy to decide on who
Bismarck irl had depth charges on her stern
Only a few but still
so could you put a naval gun turret on a submarine and go close enough to a ship to where its guns cant get you (because of gun depression) and just fire away?
What kind of information in particular are you looking for?
Unfortunately I only really have data from secondary sources
In modern times depth charges aren't used that much anymore right?
There are still some ASW mortar systems in service, but, they're not really that relevant anymore
Bro why not just use torps
Been mostly replaced by ASROCs and such?
The kind of role they took up is now mostly taken up by ship-launched lightweight torpedoes
Particulairs of the gun (twist rate, lengths, weights, projectiles) and possibly the story you had on the gun killing someone of the Koninklijke Marine
Also submarines are slow. I don't think there was a ww2 submarine that could catch up to a destroyer
And if you need to throw the torpedo out further, stuff like VL-ASROC or MILAS is a thing.
Not to mention your helicopters!
i was meaning to intercept it ik they are slow
They can't catch up to +20 knot BBs too
Or +25*
it's hard to intercept if you are slower than the thing you are intercepting
Yes, but most naval guns on subs are small
Think like AA missile. AA has to be faster then the target missile for a good chance to intercept it
And getting to that distance is suicidal
And also likely impossible
Since the ship is faster
this may be a dumb question, but if you saw a torpedo, could you shoot at it in the water with an aa gun and hope to hit the explosives?
Also didn't like Submarines have naval guns early on
The crew will also probably hurl live grenades onto your hull
Yes
Depends on depth
If it's surface level it's possible
One of taiho’s planes suicided into a torpedo to stop a torpedo
Ok this is something I've been wanting to ask for a while now but Ark Royal's slow skill ingame is a reference to the torpedo that slowed the Bismarck right? If so is there an irl reference to the time stop thing of Formi?
are there any times where someone actually managed to destroy a torpedo with one of the small caliber guns on a ship?
was bismarcks speed dropped significantly by her torpedo hit?
Idk that's what I thought the slow was referencing
Yes, actually
Irrc Formidable disabled the engine of Veneto
With torpedo attack
The first torpedo hit had only minor consequences
The second/third one was what reduced the speed from 24-27kn to like... eight
Since she was forced to try and steer with her propulsion shafts after the torpedo hit aft, and as the weather got worse this hampered her speed
Shortly disable*
aight then thank you
Engines weren't disabled by that torpedo hit, Krem









