#history
1 messages · Page 50 of 1
You say I should use that word more efficiently?
Largest quad Soviets designed was quad 450mm
Tho Even that was a proposal tho
as a rescue engineer you should know redundancy does not mean safety, preventative or mitigation

it is a crucial step tho
if you correctly implement it in whatever scenario you think might take place
forgive my lack of jargon
thinking of how much heavier turntable ladders get when you apply the desirable redundancy

for the older ships, I presume?
What about coastal guns
well that's what I'm trying to find out
Shikishima's still around too
Kawachi blew herself up conveniently in 1918
Russian Battleship Orel took a hit on her 5.75-inch (15.8 cm) belt from a 12-inch (30.5 cm) shell which failed to penetrate```
A movable object meets a stoppable force
A movable object meets a very stoppable force
when a not so good thing cancels out an even worse thing

this feels like early shonen manga chapters
unfortunately said movable object is not in the best shape and flammable
I'd say the blackpowder fillers of Japanese common shells also had a say in that
Wait I asked this question yesterday but nobody answered: Why does it look like that US BBs have like flatter sides than other BBs that follow a more concave shape
She does look like Stalingrad hull so 
Rich
Speeds are written near it 
now give me medium battleship
Your choice goes at 36.2 knots
Does have higher velocity than Soyuz I think
Should be improved for sure

Okay... This is much better... I can actually read people's messages without having to scroll back up constantly XD
We get in the mood 

Anyways, the original Yorktown CVs (Yorktown, Hornet, Enty) we're all exceptional in each their own way... But they stood no chance of making it to the modern day as museum ships.
Why? Because just as it is today, aircraft carriers require a SHITTON of capital to maintain and with the US economy so focused on producing and armament, saving a ship rather than recycling it was just not an efficient way of doing things
And unlike say... Battleship Texas, which managed to go above and beyond what it was ever meant to do, The Yorktown carriers while the last of their kind, had the misfortune of being around the same time the ESSEXS we're being pumped out
It was built as a dreadnought... Even by ww2 metrics it was ancient
All battleships after HMS Dreadnoughts are dreadnoughts tho
She's in good company then, not the only dreadnought that was around in WW2 that was reduced to a coastal bombardment vessel

So the mighty Missouri is a dreadnought? I don't think that's correct
Yes it is

Dreadnoughts are just BBs with a large all main gun
Not a large mix of intermediate calibers
Yeah true
A dreadnought was SPECIFICALLY any bb designed around namesake
I still don't see Texas going above and beyond
South Carolina was not designed around dreadnought
but she still is a dreadnought

By ww2 most Navy's had far surpassed and changed their designs to suit their own naval doctrine
It's American
They are all still called Dreadnoughts
But did it flood it's TDS?
Well albeit Super-Dreadnoughts
just waiting for the bulge meme
you didn't have to wait long
More range reference incoming
All ships are extremely costly to maintain once in the water
The traditional saying is that "It's not the initial cost that breaks you, but the maintenance"
Okay have you looked at a side-by-side of Mi' and the Texas? They look absolutely nothing alike
USS The Sullivans is in an absolute shit shape, as you've likely seen on the news
They just like not called them dreadnoughts and just BBs because after ww1 all in commission pre-dreadnoughts were decomissioned
We got reports of a crew dropping a wrench and it punching it clean through the bottom of the hull
A dreadnought by its definition is just a battleship with an all big-gun armament
Due to battleships before Dreadnought having a mix of intermediate calibers
As to the fate of Enterprise, it's a simple case of:
- There is not enough public interest/fund to privately buy the ship off the navy
- Enterprise is 20+ years old, battered, and incapable of opearting larger, later aircraft
- The Navy has a massive surplus of vessels
- Some of the crew wanting her scrapped
In short, she gets the blowtorch
Getting damaged a lot in wartime reduces the chances of museum quite a bit
since the repairs will aim towards "just enough", not towards 100%
praise be the Spee museumites
Something something Theseus' ship
and if you wanna preserve the ship for 70+ years, you will have to finish those repairs, all of them
I mean... Technically you can say that shipwrecks can make just as much tourism... As ari
What BB is this again?
cheaper to start anew
Not really
her ugly ss can never be allowed to resurrect
For ships like Nachi, they're a navigational hazard

For wrecks like those in Toulon, they're obstacles to shipping lanes
and when you start anew, you might as well build them on land as a fancy looking building
Or is that a cruiser?
and save yourself the hassle of maintaining a ship
bismarck is a source of iron for anaerobic bacteria
circle of life
That's why the Philippines made sure Nachi's wreck was blown to kingdom come to make sure nothing bumps into it and make yet another shipwreck
one bacterium feeds another
Lol, imagine someone without a clue asking "Japan should refloat it's old CVS"
good night, princess
Weird you don't know about Graf Spee
And then there's just some convenience of shipwrecks, like Scheer
Oh i didn't know that was the Graf Spee
Salvage what you can, bury the rest, then build a car park on top
bye to you too
or, if you're really short on materiel
they make for excellent breakwaters
What's funny is apparently it's cheaper to build a mockup of a million dollar government property than to save the real things (cough cough- space shuttles)
things you can find in car parks:
- Cars
- Asphalt
- People
- King Richard III
- A german heavy cruiser
- traffic signs
Tirpitz's wreck are famously used for Damascus knifes and less well known, infrastructure improvements
And yes, I'm being serious. NASA straight up built a mock up shuttle to display at the Johnson space center in Houston
Of course a mockup shuttle is cheaper than a real one
isn't it Australia?
No need for instruments, no need for the shielding, give me some money and plywood and I'll build one myself
All 3 space shuttles are being preserved tho?
We had more than 3
the 4th one Enterprise wasn't really space usable
thing with spaceshuttles is
they're on dry land
also all 4 of them are preserved
But did they preserve Challenger?
6 total if you include the destroyed Columbia and Challenger
bits and pieces of it, maybe
Okay, sorry for that
Being spaceworthy after the program was canned shouldn't factor into it's worth as a museum
I only counted the spaceworthy Shuttles initially but if you want to include Enterprise then yes it's still in preservation
If I remember correctly, there's very VERY little of Columbia left
It's on top of Intrepid close to a Concorde
found it, not mock ups, my bad
I remember my parents saying how they saw it practically disintegrate
thanks to hit
It re-entered at 20,000mph
also, speaking of replicas
None of it would have survived intact
thx austria
Wait what ship is this?
Some old merchant ship dressed to mock up the 136-gun Nuestra Senora de la Santisima Trinidad
nowhere near the real thing, of course, I hate it
she sank in the storm the day after trafalgar right?
Yea, after the prize crew was overthrown

Oh, not her. The brits set her loose to sink.
it's one of those French SoLs that had a uprise, but then also sank.
When did prize ships really stop being a thing?
mfw one U-boat surfaced, surrendered, the prize crew boarded, and they found the sub to be literally drowned in rotting potatoes and floating shit
What was the largest prize ship?

what U boat was this?
HMS Graph (pennant number P715) was a German Type VIIC U-boat that the British Royal Navy captured during World War II. Commissioned as U-570 in Nazi Germany's Kriegsmarine in mid-1941, she was attacked and captured on her first patrol.
She provided both the Royal Navy and United States Navy with significant information on German submarines, and...
The submarine was then lying broadside on to the surf and listing heavily to starboard... The interior of the submarine was unlit and was in a chaotic state; leaks of oil and water from the broken gauge glasses of internal tanks had combined with vast quantities of provisions, flour, dried peas and beans, soft fruit, clothes, bedding, and the remains of scores of loaves of black bread to form a revolting morass that in places was knee-deep.** It was subsequently discovered that in this ship the crew's W.C. had been converted into a food locker and overturned buckets of excrement added to the general noisome conditions.**
Most hygienic U-boat
something something subject to the requirements of the service
This sounds exactly like a sub that Al should have
They did often convert one toilet into food storage
Just curious, any logs of U-boat available by chance?
I recall going through Archerfish's logs, went as detailed enough to count how many sailors had constipation 
rather have constipation than diarrhoea
From what I've been told 2nd hand, working in modern submarines is hellish
Imagine what it was like for those sailors back then
modern subs are already quite nice
you get modern stuff like refrigerators and air conditioners
on these older things, you're stuck with a noisy engine, even more narrow walkways, and canned food
no air con too IIRC
and when submerged, do a miserable 8 knots
Yeah but with all the same risks and dangers, and all that new tech makes up for the bigger area, so I'd imagine the modern subs are still hella cramped
And that's not even mentioning the sailor's who work on nuclear powered subs
Speaking of old submarines, anyone ever heard of the CSS Hunley?
H. L. Hunley, often referred to as Hunley, CSS H. L. Hunley, or as CSS Hunley, was a submarine of the Confederate States of America that played a small part in the American Civil War. Hunley demonstrated the advantages and the dangers of undersea warfare. She was the first combat submarine to sink a warship (USS Housatonic), although Hunley was...
I know that every single torpedo firing document has been digitized
And is just waiting for you
Otherwise, UBoat logs are few available
Just like the DDs, not high profile enough to get digitized
When my best friend showed me his dad's scale model, the first thing I saw was the long ass harpoon sticking out this things front
Does anyone know where exactly Shimakaze sank?
I know it sank in Ormoc Bay (just kilometers from where I live) but are there like coordinates to where exactly in Ormoc Bay?
Yeah thought so
Because they're afraid of illegal salvagers
Most of Java Sea's wrecks are gone already
And both Prince of Wales and Repulse's wreck sites are heavily damaged
The less publicly known the coordinates are, the better
Aight then
How's Prinz Eugens wreck doing over by the bikini atoll?
Not touched that much, it's not as close to major settlements, nor is it low background steel
Was just asking because you know how there are people who do some weird ass rituals before pulling on the gacha? I want to do that by facing in the direction of Shimakaze's wreck if her event ever reran
Both of which applies to these aforementioned wrecks
Dont be weird my guy 
Unrelated to warships but they're saying the Titanics not much longer for this world because of the rate at which it's rusting
Plus salinity
Currents are not helping her
And the currents are slowly bringing the dunes of the NA shelf to burry her
On the Pacific side, most of the deeper wrecks are very well preserved
Hornet is the deepest wreck ever found right?
Samuel B Roberts
Oh wait it's the Samuel B Roberts
It's good to the point that you can still see Nevada's hatch numbers scribed clearly
And Indianapolis' ammo locker numbers
Most of the kido butai CVs are so deep and that's what preserves them right?
And most importantly for me, the bloody paint is untouched
the deeper, the less oxygen and the colder the water
oxygen and heat rust steel
so the deeper the wreck the better preserved
RV Petrel surveyed Akagi and Kaga
Petrel's RoV did a bit of funny and rammed Kaga, necessitating repairs too
The 2nd Cardiv remains unsurveyed
It's hilarious that Japan's carriers made better submarines
Have Shoukaku and Zuikaku been discovered?
You want a giga take
Most warships serve better purposes when sunk than they are afloat
depends on the depth silver
Well... If war should be avoided then yeah
The largest shipwreck is USS America right?
Fair. Can't see it good if it landed right in the middle of a coral ecosystem and fucking it up.
A government isn't intending to profit monetarily off any individual warship
and gotta make sure that fuel is gone
same with any nasty chemicals in electrical components
Iirc wasn't the Brazilian carrier not scrapped much earlier because of the Asbestos and shit in it
Well many shipwrecks become ecosystems... The deeper ones not always... Tho I do remember as a young boy reading how the Titanic does have a sort of micro-ecosystem
asbestos can't be that bad, considering how the British museum ships still have tons of it on board

Bismarck and Titanic are very big algae and anaerobic bacteria farms nowadays
so wholesome
That reminds me
It's still life and that's always a good thing
There's an ongoing tinfoil hat about how it was Olympic, not Titanic that sunk
Devolved into some nasty arguments and fighting over the algae-covered nameplate of Titanic 
Bruh, all contherories are ongoing
insurance fraud
Some wild shitflinging between whether that's an O, that's a T, yada yada
Over basically brown shit
A big ass ship sunk

Lots died
Ooh, actually, hang on, got a good pic
it was a white star moment
luckily almost noone was on board her since she was a hospital ship
not as sad as the Collins line moments
Also unlike the big T, the crew of the Britannic we're good at their jobs
Okay that was me being a little harsh
Stupid ass question: What would be the major cons if let's say a TI-Supertanker was converted into an aircraft carrier
But the circumstances were FAR far better and the Bs crew were able to actually handle themselves accordingly
it would probably cost about as much as making a brand new carrier
Carriers are probably the MOST expensive ship to build nowadays
Let's just say cost is not a dealbreaker.
first of all
the oil tanker bridge
What would be other cons of making a large oil tanker as an aircraft carrier
is in the way
It's one reason you don't see every seafaring nation building a ton of them
so you have to remove the existing bridge and then put one on the right side
then find some way to counterbalance
then
That and CVs are really not defensive tools
now you basically have a 300 meter long empty stretch of ship
which you have to fill with decks
for plane storage
So building one or more when you have no plans to use them offensively is seen as a waste
you'll have to add a flight deck
I can't imagine how awful this conversion would be
Germany for example doesn't have its own CV of any kind... Because it doesn't need to project power of such scale... Yet
The day Germany wants to build a CV, is not a day anyone looks forward too
Given minimalist efforts of Germany on military projects
they're dependent on the welfare of Europe
Doubt they will do funding for a CV
And well. Germany already has great power
With economical influence
Its harder to see compared to military of course
top 10 wehrb quotes
Why give Germany CV's when they are having issues maintaining their land forces
British people say it too.
Like wasn't their news recently that 18 Pumas became out of service due to maintenance issues
Yeah in one training exercise all the Pumas in that exercise broke down
It's a demigod in War thunder still
I expect at most 1/3 to 1/2 of all the vehicles to be down due to maintenance
Not like all of them
Guys the whole point is that a CV for a nation is seen as a show of power
To put shit in perspective, the US is able to project it's might so handily, unlike any other nation... It has dozens of carriers...
When the world is 80% ocean, having a mobile airport is quite useful for a nation wanting to project it's might
When was it commissioned? Is it just the one and why was it built?
It was build to replace the 2 Clemenceau class carrier that France had before
Also because France is still pretty involved in its past colonies
Lost the pic, feck
replacement of Foch
So having an aircraft carrier makes sense
Guess I'll try later
My logic still makes sense then
yeah but the carrier isn't used for that
Ah aight then
In geopolitics, there's a lot to be said about what people CAN do and not just what it actually does
France has carriers for multilateral and cooperative defence with its allies
especially the US
isn't France planning to make a larger carrier?
PANG
To replace Gaulle
It will have EMALS
So it's building carriers to add to it's collective power
Nuclear power too
not sure if PANG will replace de Gaulle or if they will still be using her until another PANG is built
i can already see the result
QE-class tonnage and size
izumo class hangar size
Ain't Gaulle will reach her life in 2040?
France and the UK both have good reasons to build CVs. They are still regional great powers with a need to project their influence among allies and others
She's to replace de Gaulle circa 2038
Nuclear reactors ain't good with prolonged age ye
Not even just that, but also designed hull life
Gerald Fords should reach their hull life in 2070s
Wait speaking of hull life, is there a dockyard in Pearl Harbor big enough to handle Missouri just in case they need to fix her like Texas?
In any case the MN would be looking to integrate newer aircraft in the 2040s - ex, whatever FCAS produces
Like Foch and Clemenceau, De Gaulle was perfect for anti soviet trollege
and PANG will be too

sorry krem
Super Rafale 
And it would be better not to limit FCAS by the power of de Gaulle's shorter steam catapults
In any case
I believe so, otherwise the MO would be shit out of luck on such a secluded part of the world
Germany really doesn't have any kind of need or ambition for carriers
Yeah Germany doesn't need naval fcas
Texas on the other hand had to move because of something to do with needing a new dry dock
Pretty much
Since Japan and Italy needs vtol
No
Tempest is replacing Typhoon, not F-35

Yup there are 4 dockyards in Pearl Harbor, some of them big enough to handle MO
Germany prefers to use it's power within the eurozone to influence it's allies
They will be functioning alongside each other in the future, rather than filling the same role
bro at this rate they wont even influence Poland anymore
I've been, im aware. PH is still a naval/AF base after all
We never closed it like the Brits did to scapa flow
Was wondering because aren't most US CSGs based in San Diego or smth
Germany's naval concern is basically the Baltics, and supporting NATO allies in the North Sea
god, the germany economic influence argument gets me every time
considering they had to rush building LNG terminals to provide enough NG to provide heating for their citizens

truly mindboggling
such global impact
They're just not a country that bothers to defend their SLOCs because it's covered by other countries
Shouldn't bother France much given they have 56 reactors
we like
export most of that power sadly
F
so France is still somewhat dependent
one of the few things Trump said that made sense were about germany's energy independence, but that's modern politics
Granted, their ability to focus their spending on purely European concerns... Has not exactly worked out brilliantly in execution, despite the amount of money they have to throw around
said money is rather frozen
I believe your talking about the major naval port yes. If I remember correctly, that port is WAY bigger but because it's not as fine a strategic waypoint as Pearl, it's not the main base for the Pacific fleet
Pearl ironically isn't very big, yet it's the HQ for US pacific fleets, so ships tend to go back and forth between it and allameda in California
btw phoe, didn't you ask for French ship costs?
And yes, the US has TWO SEPARATE FLEETS
I remember something about the only forward deployed CSG is in Japan right?
Ronies in Japan
Most US CSGs are home ported on the east coast
But, yeah, there's one forward deployed at Yokosuka
used to be kitty hawk
I believe so, Reagans patrolling the seas between Korea, China, and Japan because of tensions arising from the region
Were there any CSGs homeported in Subic Bay before that base was shut down?
I don't think so
Otherwise, one at Bremerton, three in San Diego, and the rest are all at Norfolk
I did, yeah
which ones?
Was looking for the costs of the interwar cruisers
Though if you have the costs of the modern battleships that would be great too
I'm also missing the Mogador-class
The hilarious thing I've noticed is, our eastern fleet has little excitement other than playing hide and seek with Russia in the north
Yeah, I mean, the North and Atlantic were always the main naval theater for the Cold War, WDYE
The Pacific was always smaller scale
The PLAN only started becoming something to worry about in the 2010s.
I might be wrong on this one but if history serves me well, then one big task the US Atlantic fleet has us monitoring the Denmark straights... It's a vital seaway that Russia can use as a way to get to the rest of the Atlantic
That kind of collectively falls to the USN, RN, MN, and Norwegian navy
Denmark straits suicide run
But the Soviet strategy was never to try and fight a third Battle of the Atlantic
Though the US did spend a lot of the Cold War thinking that
The US being the biggest of those 3, probably puts forth the most
isn't the main target the GIUK gap?
The Denmark Strait is one part of the GIUK gap
Biggest but also least local
Even if it wasn't the soviets plan, it's A plan. Prepare for every possible scenario
Ah wait whenever I hear Denmark Strait I keep thinking about the Baltic sea connection thru Denmark
I've honestly not mapped the deployments over time so I don't know how much time they spend up there versus the other navies that deal with it
Though obviously you can't really account for submarine activity
I'm ashamed of my high school because I thought the same thing until I actually looked the battle uo
It's called the Denmark straights because... Greenland is a part of the kingdom of Denmark
Or at least it was
Don't know if it still is
But, anywho, US CSGs from the east coast deploy in the North Atlantic, North Sea, Mediterranean, and also the Indian Ocean whenever CENTCOM was crying for a carrier
Thank God that stopped
Ah ok ok. The strait between Greenland and Iceland is called the Denmark Strait. The one in between Denmark and the Baltic sea is the Danish straits
Duguay-Trouin: 26.1 million francs
Duquesne: 24.3 million francs
Suffren: 26.8 million francs
Dunkerque: 229 million francs
(values in 1914 francs)
can't find Mogador cost rn but will get back to you
Then there's a Danish Strait off the coast of Canada
They just commissioned one, yeah
Aren't they building its sister ship as well?
That'll hopefully give lots of their people jobs
Finished Vikrant
There was supposed to be a larger follow-on in the 2030s, but it's not clear if that's happening anymore
Might be a smaller carrier
INS Vishal, also known as Indigenous Aircraft Carrier 2 (IAC-2), is a planned aircraft carrier to be built by Cochin Shipyard Limited for the Indian Navy. It is intended to be the second aircraft carrier to be built in India after INS Vikrant (IAC-1). The proposed design of the second carrier class will be a new design, featuring significant cha...
Thanks, that's a big help
note the cost jump for Dunkek
Aren't they also planning a 2nd carrier based on Vikrant before going for Vishal?
I want 2 number 9s
A number 9 large.
2 25s
Dunkerque is still in 1914 francs, right?
Why was Dunkerque so expensive
yes
I mean, it's a battleship versus 10,000-ton cruisers
Seems like India is gearing up to be a huge influence in the region
Ofc it's going to cost far more
Ah wait the others are cruisers
Most likely against china
Though 10x as much as a lot more of a jump than usual
Dunkerque was
- a battleship
- uses two types of quad turrets
- uses much newer materials
Dunk is a BB?
Yes
Is there a price also of the Richelieu BBs?
India wants to be able to be the foremost naval power in the Indian Ocean, so that's kind of the end-goal they're aiming towards.
Some reason I can't accept Kongos and Dunks as a BB 
how many baguettes did a French bb cost?
Ok why Dunk is a BB
Because it was designed as such? It's quite heavily armored for its displacement.
Look beyond sheer belt thickness
I also discovered that the Sautter-Harlé workers were on strike when Dunk was made in 1936
and that company was responsible for RPC
It says 225mm but am I missing smh?
so I wonder if the strikes have some hand in the dropping of the RPC
Though even the belt isn't bad for a ship of her displacement
The deck armor, main battery and secondary battery protection, CT protection, torpedo defense...
When people talk about how weird some bbs are... I just remind them the Nazis wanted to build cruisers with big ass Bismark sized guns
O class and Kronshtadt class of Soviets?
Dunkerque technically boasted better deck armor and better main battery protection than Bismarck (though, I would note Bismarck's turret faces were still 30mm thicker - though Strasbourg did match it)
The French built a cruiser gun on one of it's subs
Man no wonder Kronshtadt cant beat Dunks in war games 
skill issue
also, the high cost of Dunk might be inflated due to France not having built a BB since Normandie
india is going through a more reasonably paced naval expansion compared to china
and the technological shift between 1927 and 1930
Never compare Vikrant's construction time with Type 003 
Speaking of French bbs... Of all the research ships... I have enough faction points for everyone except BREST
i just like looking at the self defence armament of the indian carriers
Tbh, I think that's more a case of the Chinese have far more money and shipbuilding capacity to actually expend on building large numbers of ships at once.
once china deals with itself im sure india will pull away from the west though
Though tbh China has also far outstripped India when it comes to domestic development of naval systems
👁️
God I fucking love seeing West and Soviet equipment together
lol
makes sense tho
Wait which carrier is this?
vikrant
Wait it was the Kuznetsov right that had ASMs in VLS cells on the flight deck?
kek I found the cost of the french 25k t battlecruiser projects
It's a weird chain of issues for China.
They have a navy, but Taipei has a navy backed by the US

plan has a variety of issues and the usn is certainly one of them
Ye
biggest issue though is recession
"I have 99 problems and the USN is a solid 80 of them"
These are what missiles again. Granit right?
P 700 ye
Makes her a cruiser
economics is the fundamental biggest killer of naval armament programs since the dawn of time
and china is starting to encounter one hell of an economic fiasco
i guess they can spend the next 20 years selling off the giant navy they just built for pennies on the dollar to whoever wants themselves a brand new DDG to try and keep themselves afloat
She also have these SAMs in corners but they are less known
those are the same SAMs as in the TOR right?
I would guess that recession is going to slow the rate of naval expansion, rather than kill it
Kinzhals yep
They're still working with a very underwhelming navy relative to their economic weight
economic weight is hardly helpful when theres a huge famine on the horizon
mmmm critical water shortages thanks to decades of mismanagement
One of the main issues for the Chinese carrier force would be the lack of actually using Carrier borne aircraft right?
Given how gigantic China economy is. I doubt they will reach THAT poor level tho
Though, in light of economic difficulties, I do have to hypothesis that perhaps this bite is why they haven't started building any new Type 055 yet.
Not that I have much evidence to point to other than the absence of new 055's (so it is nothing more than a hypothesis), but...
im gonna be honest the chinese economy is a solid 10% smaller than what they claim it is at a minimum according to independent research
and its shrinking a lot faster than they say it is
Oh, yeah, that goes without saying
They are developing J-35 fighter for Type 003. But use J-15 for current carries
china isnt like the US that is literally too big to fail
J-15 is a copy of Su-33. Which was designed for carrier operations
Chinese GDP figures (and population figures) have a lot of smoke and mirrors going on
China is very much able to fail and we are witnessing its failure
mfw lowest fertility rate on the planet
mfw massive water crisis
mfw construction industry crisis
But, personally speaking I've seen enough pronouncements of the doom of China over the years that I'm basically preconditioned to never jump on the assumption when it's presented.
Don't they also have like a power crisis
Like their electric grid is very fragile as well
Never plan on your enemies falling apart
Because of Australian coal?
yep
almost as if stopping imports from your number 1 supplier of household and industrial energy isnt a good idea
Wouldn't that also kind of hurt Australian exports?
end of the day Chinas probably going to be mostly fine but the next few decades are going to be very bad
and thus the Australian economy?
that was the plan but it didnt work
other people ate up all of the Australian exports
the thing is that Australia doesnt just have a lot of coal it's that its coal is of very high quality
Anthracite?
unlike say Indonesia or even China itself which also has a lot of coal but mostly of poor quality
so there's always buyers
idk I don’t think we’re ever gonna see a Chinese state failure what I’m mainly thinking is that they’re at the end of the era of unimpeded economic growth
India and other developing economies snatched up the opportunity at buying Australian coal for cheap
thus our domestic supply chains have shifted away from supplying to china
a few industries are very china specific and have been suffering but it's nowhere near as bad as a lot of the apocalyptic reporting from overseas and domestic media was predicting
wine is probably the biggest loser of the sanctions along with a few other alcoholic beverage sectors
agriculture suffered a little bit but that sector has far bigger problems to deal with rn
Tbh isn't whole Asia at its worst for fertility?
just China and Japan afaik
Mostly the major economic countries such as Japan, China and SoKor
Korea 
also South Korea
other countries have a pretty good fertility rate
i was under the impression that SK was still a fair bit higher than japan even if it wasnt at replacement rate
There at .84 babies per women
Nope below the 2.1 replacement rate
In fact
Even worse than Japan actually
Japan has a higher rate
damn .84
Japan is at 1.3 while SoKor is at 0.84
fuck i thought they were at like 1.5 lmfao
fertility rates are falling globally anyways
we made fun of japans fertility rates
its a bit of an issue
0.8 Korea
Yet watch them end up with the highest in developed Asia
Abes dream fulfilled
It seems to come inevitably with development
I'm honestly surprised that the Philippines only has a 2.5 fertility rate
thought it would be way higher
Honestly expected it to be like 3 or 4
We're probably going to hit peak global population only in the 2090s, and it will be between 10 and 11 billion
Doesn't ban Anime
idk regarding birth rates you have to solve the societal issues combined with the economic issues for it to go back up
Very hard when Japan hosts one of the largest incel populations in the world
What’s that going to do to solve the issue of people spending far too much time at work
yeah its not incels or anime its worker abuse
A lot of Japanese corporations are starting to change their work culture iirc
Mostly the bigger corps

👁️ at least you have shit like spy x family which is encouraging people to have kids
work culture change is worthless from the top down
real change comes from workers and unions
You gotta convince people that the future isn't shit so they would have babies
main issues is affording children combined with having time for children
combined with making people actually meet each other
tho japans probably better off in that regard since they aren’t in car dependency hell
Yeah isn't the dating culture in Japan kind of toxic?
it can be, tho they’re better set up for that type of thing because people aren’t tied down to the suburbs
Honestly dating culture has been ruined by social media
There is a dating culture?
Yes?
Huh
I mean, think of it like anything else. There's a culture of norms for interactions, just like, say, you might have a 'work' culture or 'sports' culture or anything else like that

These can vary by country and time period
not particularly no

Sad gun
happy gun
sappy gun

that wording sounds so weird
Conveniently, as part of working on that, you can also encourage immigration
Which is something Japan is horrible at
@alpine onyx finally found some concrete info on SMS Thüringen post-1918
Trying to look for the test results
strangely, even mine has one key difference, 6.2'' instead of 6.1'' for main deck
Montana's deck armor mystery
Bill Jurens stated that Montana's weather deck was supposed to be two 45# plates
without backing
Maka where did you get 6.2" from?
battleships illustrated
dangerous
and it might just be rounding, mine also has 2'' sts weather deck instead of 2.1'' like jaba's would round to
Cutie
since at that point you're trying to decide on 0.1'' thickness differences, which is like 2mm
derrflinger do got some nice side protect tho
derfflinger actually extends the belt to cover the turrets
and has actual barbette armor
the price?
a deck
clearly she has a lower freeboard
I do like how this implies you can shoot a shell through tiger and never hit the turret
sadly this would be in the pre-1922 era
corditus
explodus
derff's upper belt is 1mm thicker than Tiger's main belt
well her upper upper belt

Derfflingers are cuties
Seydlitz
actually I find most WW1 BC's to be cuties
looking at Tiger and Derff side by side, and looking at the area of armor on both ships, you can see why Derff could be uparmoured compared to Tiger

Jane moment
12" CT is actually 266mm
I'm going to make a nice armor diagram for Courbet and Bretagne
and Danton
especially Danton

Found some new info on Lyon
Supposedly she’d have had an 80mm anti torpedo bulkhead which also needed to protect against underwater hits
not bad
When Nevada and Lorraine engaged with the Saint mandrier battery with its two twin 340mm guns, they would be engaging it at the edge of their firing range (about 30k yards)
But the Coastal battery turrets had a 270mm roof meaning they were impervious to this shelling
Allied warships fired 1,532 shells from 8" guns or above : 880 against Turret C (K-20) and 652 against Turret F (K-21). USS Nevada contributed a total of 260 x 14" shells (188 AP rounds + 72 HC rounds), all of them presumably against Turret F. Lorraine fired a total of 128 x 340mm rounds.

Tough little turrets
that's a thicc roof
Sexy
How many did it hit
Lorraine that is
No direct hits by Lorraine, Nevada or Ramilies
But the turret was hit by a 2000 lb bomb which knocked out one of the two barrels for a while
This is the aftermath
Bruh
Direct hit would probably be unpleasant for the crew
Not as unpleasant as turning into ground meat, but a concussion should be free of charge
Shouldn’t be too bad
Ringing ears and daze
Saint-Mandrier Battery is the only battleship-type turret coastal battery to see heavy action against aerial bombing and naval gunfire. Battleship-type turret coastal battery combines large-caliber guns, heavy armor protection and small size.

I fucking love barrels
Wish they build more
Well there were two
Why are these listed as Germany coastel gun
They are French built

I miss big cannons
Hold up
57mm Mle.1947

This is the predecessor of the 57mm Mle.1951
It existed!

thicc smol box
but I have been here
"Capitalist fairytales begin with, 'Once upon a time there was...'"
"Communist fairytales begin with, 'Someday there will be...'"
— Soviet joke
Hence the reason 
520mm AP shell

Regal's leave reminded me the future where one day one of us won't be in this server anymore
So I will miss you in that future Maka 
I don't intend to leave server, so no worry about that friend
Leningrad
can we accelerate that

where is that is it just on a random street?
Aww I would never leave you Reina 
In front of a French artillery school
Together with the 520mm HE
In Leningrad they would have used the HE
Why not AP for Marat?
Out of range I assume
does france just have things like that in places in cities?
Every country with a long military history has old large caliber shells in specific locations
russia has t-34s on large stone monuments from the great patriotic war but im not going to russia
It's called being proud of your nation's enthusiasm on using avaliable balistic research and material science for creating such advanced weapons of destruction
It's harder to make a +500mm shell than a +300
Russia peaked at 500mm
on a ship right?
Russia build 500mm land cannon
oh i was worried they made 500mm tank
Max for navy was 406mm of Soyuz
Bulgaria, Poland, Hungary should have them as well
Actually. Many nations have T34 in tank museums
does belarus? i know ukraine used to have some but some of them got taken down
If it's Ex Soviet they likely have few around
day 3 of posting underappreciated Cold War Vehicles, Unknown North Korean MLRS
obscure as fuck
this was an interesting design, too. tbh not sure why it didnt work it seems pretty good
Oh, Ekranoplans
lovely
nothing beats the soviet hydrofoil ferry though
Minister Ustinov died in 1984, and the new Minister of Defence, Marshal Sokolov, cancelled funding for the program. Only three operational Orlyonok-class ekranoplans (with revised hull design) and one Lun-class ekranoplan remained at a naval base near Kaspiysk.
as far as i know, there are close to none pictures of this thing
we dont know its name
we dont know shit about it
the coolest looking thing to come out of the soviet union
Cutie
they are my favorite non military boats ever
and sadly almost no one knows about them
Well it's Soviet
Soviet projects are generally known much less compared to American or German ones
Yes, Friedman says 6.2 outboard, not 6.1.
I don't think the SHIPS-19 archive has the Montana plans digitised too.
Lol, nope
Imperial metrics and its consequences
didnt Thüringen survive the war?
if anything, things like that happen either due to rounding (british method to look more impressive) or putting it in a different system it wasn't made in then back
put any language through google translate and back a few times and it's nonsensical
I guess
I dont think this is the case here, especially over the weather deck.
Diagram I posted earlier suggests 1 60# STS, but Garzke and Juren both seem to look differently.
Hmm
you could have plans for ships made in measurements of legal sized paper, as long as the builders understand it and the size of legal paper is defined it's a nonissue
both common systems of measurement are arbitrary and do not change math
Top part is conspicuously missing compared to the NC/SD/Iowa diagrams.
So where does the #45 claim from Juren come from is...?
Which ship is this from?
Montana
Ah ok
Go to https://bit.ly/Historigraph for a free 14 day trial and 50% off subscriptions with My Heritage
Check out the raid on Kronstadt poster here: https://historigraph.creator-spring.com/listing/raid-on-kronstadt-1919
In the early hours of August 19th 1919, a handful of small British torpedo boats snuck into Kronstadt, the most heavily defende...
It's a topic that kinda came up earlier in gen
But are there any ships worthy of UR rarity based on real history and not just stats
Like for example Johnston and Sammy b would be UR because of their history not because of how strong they are
@spiral cedar Bill Jurens nailed the Montana's armour scheme, backing it up with SHIPS-19 as a source (which is where I found Alaska's cross section)
The detailed armor plans for the Montana class are very complex, making it nearly impossible to provide a complete and accurate description in secondary-source schematic form. There is just no real way to do the arrangements justice on a scale of 1:1000 or so, so working from these sorts of documents, though not entirely futile, will inevitably lead to some apparent discrepancies.
There is a good deal of correspondence on file describing the evolution of the armor arrangements of these ships, and it remains difficult -- at least for me -- to determine with certainty exactly what the final finished' arrangement was when the ships were abandoned. No Booklets of General Plans would have been prepared insofar as these documents are usually only done for ships already completed, or nearly so. In any case, Booklets of General Plans omitted armor by regulation, making them (usually) not very useful for interpreting the details of armor design.
In any case, the contract plans show the following, rounded off to the nearest inch or so, except of course for thicknesses.
Forward Transverse Bulkheads: 18" Class A from 2nd deck down about 19'-0". 17" Class A from the bottom of the 18" belt above down another 11'-0". 16" Class A from the bottom of the 17" belt above down to the Upper Inner Bottom. After faces aligned.
After Transverse Bulkheads: 15.25" class A from 2nd Deck down to a point about 3 feet below the 1st Platform. 12.75" class A from there down to the upper inner bottom. Forward faces aligned.
The Main Deck: 45# STS over 45# STS. This was, technically, not considered armor.
Garzke is off
if history were a determining factor for UR status then Shimakaze would be purple at best
Shimakaze's a fucking R at best
Unremarkable service with the exception of her own boilers exploding from a riddled hull
Then finished off after left crippled and dead in the water, just about the fate of a fuck ton of IJN DDs
Yea that's kinda what we were getting at
I said UR french in Feb and then someone said french ships didnt do anything and there wouldn't be a french UR
Like shinano had one job of moving from 1 place to another and sank
But she is UR

clem is a possibility
basing on history alone does make it kinda weird in its own way though, since often that is down to how often the ship was used or even pure luck
Rarity has proven time and after time to be irrelevant to rarity
Hutten is at 760 tons, UR tier
yeh
if it were historical id be getting my UR Sydney next week
and not impressice specs wise either
so there does need to be a combination of both history and capability the ship would have, but often we end up with neither
Cool
Remind me in January when I can use my computer again
sydney really should be UR tho
But like I now just kinda wanna know what ships would be UR solely based on history
Enterprise and Nevada are easy picks
Warspite is wanked to hell, and for good reason
texas would be nice
Like Jervis bay taking on Admiral Scheer to save the rest of the convoy
Even tho all they did was buy time and didn't land a single hit
That kind of UR worthy

nc and mass too, mass destroyed multiple enemy ships, nc was in practically every pacific battle
Mass is just being very based

Possibly the longest hits from a BB too
I'll also give a shout to USS Borie
Boarding action with a uboat and using coffee mugs as weapons
kongos for UR
omaha would probably be ssr or something, since she actually captured a german ship

fuck yamato floating hotel lookin ass
kongos were the real work horses
im not biased at all
Tfw Kongo and Haruna are considered a lucky pair
like how many ships can say they captured an enemy ship lol

Stord is also probably UR worthy, if the tale of launching torps 400m (!) away from Scharnhorst is credible
shouldnt have left her best sister alone
all the kongos are great and its a damn shame they dont have the stats they deserve being the only japanese capitals to do anything of note
Aka "Every ship we escort will die"
certainly more active than nagato
The Kongos have a good virtue
And they are British ships
Which maka will reject

Spid
I mean they also look nice
Alright, I'll say it
Haruna'a funnel is the least appealing of the four Kongos
Shorter fore funnel and taller back funnel is very no for me
hm, that's valid
Hiei's got good looks, but eeehh history, I suppose
Got fucked by San Francisco, Enterprise and another k/d ratio tally for Yukikaze
hiei was a meme
diejoeboo
why yes of course this battlecruiser with all of its guns and armour removed is just a yacht dont ask what we did with the stuff dont check the warehouse no stop we're treaty compliant
Also, if we're going by history as rarity
Yudachi, Hatsutuki, Murakumo, Arashi, Makigumo, Chikuma, Tone, Akikaze, I-8, I-26 all goes to below common for me
The dog ought to be tried and executed
poi
I cant believe she said "It's poiing time" and "poii'd all over those drowning survivors of USS Little"
Fuck her.

Nearly forgot Akikaze
Probably one of the worst
"Between Manus and Rabaul each of the adults was strung up by the hands on a gallows in the stern of the vessel, shot dead by rifle or machine-gun fire, and thrown overboard. The two Chinese infants and the European baby were thrown over alive."
The Bushido demands it, I assure you
the what and the what
The babies were not being honorable
I
I guess so
which destroyer threw gaido and his pilot overboard at midway?
cus they were drowned alive
Arashi
With a fire axe to the back of the head
Makigumo commited similar atrocities and was not shown on screen in Midway 2019
But yea, every ship here did a funny one way or the other
Instant shit tier for me
yeh
Stanly would be SSR
To survive not one, but two baka bombs, that's quite an achivement
that was osmus, but i cant find anything about gaido and o flaherty
Makigumo
After an interrogation, the crew tied weights around the feet of O'Flaherty and Gaido and threw them into the Pacific to drown, instead of keeping them prisoner until they reached Japan. Makigumo's crew thought of it as payback for the loss in the battle of Midway of the aircraft carriers Akagi, Kaga, Sōryū, and Hiryū, which had formed two-thirds of the Kidō Butai Pearl Harbor attack force.
doesn't this also count as war crimes?
Yes
No, because he likely perished in action
would make sense
Or if he didn't, commit seppuku like I-8's commander
Pieces of shit
Oh, right, Aoba belongs on that list too
midway 2019 was also much more positive in their portrayal
For ordering Tone to do the funny
they did not show the two pilots being beaten the shit out of
then again, at least it isn't bridge on the river kwai
Of course not
"yes we will build the bridge as good as possible because muh british pride :))))"
comedy on the level of monty python
The ending credit actually made me furrow when I saw it in the theatre
the one in midway?
"This film is dedicated to all US and Japanese sailors that lost their lives in WWII"
Sure buddy, gotta give dedication to those war criminals, especially after you showed what happened to the Chinese civvies in the aftermath of the Doolittle Raid
yeah, interesting choice on the director's part 
still, despite all the inaccuracies i liked the film
It's okay, but falls flat on portraying the Japanese dilemma imo
Especially making Nagumo look like an actual moron
most paciifc war films do
can't forget the infamous "sleeping giant" line from tora
The real atrocious example here is Bay's Pearl Harbor
F-86s in 1942 :^)
i must confess i've never watched that film
ive heard its terrible tho
tora tora tora had an actual runway accident happen
WHAT the hell
Good, stay away from it
modern films man
Watched it too many times as a kid












