#history
1 messages · Page 49 of 1
the age of beauty
That said, it did come with a very nice booklet of general plan of 
Right, time to sleep after that clown show that is Stille's book
Good lols for the night at least
Typical that you have a picture of that
can confirm, a man dressed in red stole snacks from me two days ago
it must've been the KGB

Your hot dogs?
cookies and milk this time

Tfw British 17pdr shell caps are the same shape as those on their BB AP shells
Look at it
F6F-3 carrier-based fighter crash landing on USS Enterprise
Krem

Fine I will share positive things
Prayers on South Dakota
Soviet and American sailors celebrate the surrender of Japan

Issuing a salary on the flight deck of the USS Independence
Torpedo bomber Type 97 "Kate" sits on the deck of the aircraft carrier "Shoukaku"
The crew of the USS Lexington celebrate Christmas 1944.
In the decoration of the cabin improvised materials were used.
F
can't believe santa found the time to visit all the usn ships, he truly is amazing
Paris boner

Do you have a map like this for Belgium?
Should be hilarious
I have 2 european ones
Proof that Drenthe doesnt exist
Here are 2 with the whole of europe
I like that I live in a valley
Maas spotted
Mountains begone
Goed

We're gonna build a wall and make the fish pay
im surprised italy has so many people in the southern region
You thought it was a desert or smth?
Cranky old people needed some place to retire
Yes 
Sicily doesn’t exist
i have heard that italy has a more agricultural southern region and that the northern part is more business idk if is real
Puglia is ocean

Italian agriculture is in the north
The south has
Olive trees
ok
If it's in pizza then it's also in Italy
did italy really elect a facist or has the american news been lying to me?
@ivory ridge
oh
how many pugs live in puglia is the real question
9

I thought that was a pokeball at first
Spon is gone
"We do quite a considerable amount of mental trickery and mockery of those who are unfortunate enough to fall victim to our clever little trap of social teasing"
Dunkerque returning to Brest following the Naval Review of May 1937. The quarterdeck is dominated by the aircraft facilities. Two of the after 130mm quads are abeam the hangar with the third above it. (P du Cheyron collection)

the shape of dunkirk's hull reminds me of an improved admiral hipper hull
Wha?
here on this hipper class, you can see the hill curving back outwards near the waterline, where as the Dunkirk does not seem to have this
How are their hulls similar
the shape of the stern and the sides seem kinda similar

similar, except for the hippers silly thing at the waterline
ok ive always wondered why some ships fly the flag at the front
also why is there a russian ship with a messed up looking union jack on the front?
its the Russian naval jack
i thought that was the reverse scotland flag
whats the difference?
A jack is a flag flown from a short jackstaff at the bow (front) of a vessel, while the ensign is flown on the stern (rear). Jacks on bowsprits or foremasts appeared in the 17th century. A country may have different jacks for different purposes, especially when (as in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands) the naval jack is forbidden to other...
ok but why do russias naval flags look like reskins of uk flags?
it dates back to Peter I
The Russian Navy ensign, also known as St. Andrew's flag (Russian: Андреевский флаг; Russian Pre-reform: Андреевскій флагъ), was the ensign of the Navy of the Russian Empire (from 1712 to 1918), and is the naval ensign of the Russian Federation since 1992, and the banner of the Navy of the Russian Federation since 2000.The flag has a white backg...
but essentially
its St Andrew's Cross
Yeah Soviets removed it after revolution
Tho it came back after collapse
I honestly preferred Soviet one
Was more unique and cute
Cross flags are boring
Except British. They do have good coloring
war in the balkans war in the balkans
Which one
@chilly flower
My grandfather side by side with the T33 that is currently exposed in the Central square of Dumont
I liked last one
Few aircraft draw as much derision as the Fairey Barracuda. It was built to be "all things to all people" - a torpedo bomber that was also a competent dive bomber and reconnaissance platform.
But its development was troubled from the start.
It was originally intended to be the recipient of a new generation of Rolls Royce engines specifically bu...
When a ship is underway, you "break" the flag over the main gaff, i. e. On the main mast or other lines near that region
When a ship is at port, you hoist the colours on the "Jackstaff", usually located on the bow or stern of the ship.
i thought their developing a plane to replace the f22
they are
that ads over 20 years old
i didnt read the second part
lmao
also why are they even showing the mcdonnell and boeing concepts
its gonna be martin
The Italian cruiser Giuseppe Garibaldi, recipient of one of the wackier rebuilds in history, is the topic of today's video.
When commissioned at the tail-end of the 1930s, it is doubtful that anyone could have imagined what she would end up as. The entire concept would have seemed utterly alien.
Want to support the channel? https://www.patreon...
its always martin
its literally a image showing off of the program competitors
back when the JSF was still a competition
douglas doesnt have the tailfins so i doubt itll manuever good
boeing looks like a pathetic blob of steel
day 2 of posting underappreciated Cold War Vehicles, 2S14 Zhalo
how many mm penetration
+whats the armour plating like
its a BTR
with a 85
"The 2S14 Zhalo-S was built on the BTR-70 armored personnel carrier chassis, with a turret mounting an 85 mm 2A62 gun, which had identical ballistic characteristics and ammunition to the towed 2A55 anti-tank gun. The 2A62 was equipped with a muzzle brake with an efficiency up to 75-80%, able to fire 20-25 shells per minute. The 2A62 used armor-piercing composite-rigid (APCR) shells, which were exclusive to the gun."
did germany have any torpedo planes in ww2 because ive never seen one
They used HE-111 irrc
They messed with it for a bit with the Fw-190 and Ju-87 as well.
Germany primarily used sea planes for the deployment of airborne torpedos
the HE-115 was, other than the F-111 the main torpedo bomber aircraft of the luftwaffe
the ju-188 would also be used in the role heavily
F-111? I can't seem to search for an F-111. The only thing that pops up is the Aardvark
Or do you mean the He-111?
Browsing too much NCD, are you?
Was wondering "huh how did the F-111 become a torpedo bomber"
i simp the pig all days of the week silver
lazerpig?
ncd has nothing to do with my love of the aircraft
no
the F-111 was called the pig in RAAF service
Ah the vark
Thought you're going to go all "Vark" from here on out
Australian pilots considered aardvark to be too hard to say
also we dont have aardvarks here
so pig it became because it has a snout nose
lazerpig is a... poor content creator
bad piggies
wrong
excuse me?
almost all of his videos are littered with inaccuracies, falsehoods or exaggerations
one of his recent videos was based entirely on an unsourced, unconfirmed, pdf he found online
his video on the t34 was very good
his only videos with any substance are those tackling issues which are long-since resolved in most online forums and exist only to fellate those who already knew the content within them and just want to hear someone else say it to them
okay
but does anyone here watch squire? probably one of the most historically accurate ww2 channels out there tbh
his Boyd video was also... bad
ok
does more to attack Boyds character than what he was actually saying, and a lot of the time what he was saying wasn't wrong
I wouldn't call lazerpigs videos full of inaccuracies
but he does lay on the comedy to the point where it becomes the main drive of the video
and the actual substance is lost
he also rags on the fighter mafia too hard
they werent right on a lot of things
but they also werent always wrong
to be quite honest im of the opinion that just about anything he says that isnt about a tank should be entirely disregarded
but then as im not a huge tank nerd i cant fully verify what hes saying
He's good for entertainment
But as someone doing proper in-depth research and presenting unbiased results (in whatever form that works), he's not good
I really want him to shit on a British vehicle
So I can believe he is not that biased
Eh, that's not necessarily proof of him being unbiased
I have my biases towards German stuff, yet I will out-shittalk anyone when it comes to Shitzig
Hmm
I'm not a big fan of Gnevnies. I get the concept of being cheap and easy to build is nice but they really wasted resources for such ships instead building larger and more useful destroyers
They do serve as a case of a somewhat modern destroyer that snapped in two in heavy weather
Should have focused on Udaloi class earlier 
She was gonna have twin DP 130mm mounts too
Would be much more useful for ww2
wouldn't it be possible to give the Gnevnies 100mm single dp guns?
So where will you put them
instead of the main guns
the surface gunnery action of Soviet DDs during the war was limited, and even during those they didn't seem to make good use of the larger caliber
Well that's a hindsight
of course
If they knew that they would likely focus on AA
Smh like Japanese going 100mms earlier
them using a single 76mm gun per side was a waste tbh
another 37mm
the 76mm gun was used like a heavy AA gun, but with only one burst you can't do proper fire control
unless you have god tier tolerances
Tashkent and Ognevois gets the twin turret 76mm later
Turns to twin 85mms on Ognevoi later
that's better, but still not quite there
Yeah American way is better
127mm, 40mm, 20mm
Tho Americans have the 127mm
Soviets don't have the DP 130
So 76mm was coping way 
another 37mm gun, or something more imposing in the close range department, would have served them better against the usual aerial threats
Hell remove 1 torp launcher for more 37mm too
Why were the Japanese so reluctant on letting go casemates on their capital ships? Speaking of which, what even was the first capital ship design to not include casemates.
Yamato
Yamato ironic enough
Her earlier designs still had casemate
And I guess the casemate guns had some use during the night battle shenanigans
Kaga, Bearn and Zeppelin are only Cvs with casemate right?
Akagi
No, I mean inclusive of all designs, including paper
Even the Yamato preliminaries
I mean, with MHV you have the amazing benefit of knowing exactly where he got each point from

That's the great part.
1929
Hot damn that smoke stack
Thank you though
Yamato preliminaries look so jank, even the late designs..
Love those 203mms
I see you haven't seen the Kongo Daikan yet
What da helllll
You see sir, while you argue over casemates or turrets, you just need to use the big brained method of dual purpose casemates
I heard they attempted at those
14CM/55 TWIN DUAL-PURPOSE TURRET
They actually exist.. my..
Why tf is the breakwater so high on the top design lol
I get that you usually shoot broadside
tbh, those Kongou Kai designs are too whack, I don't see them having enough headroom for upgrades they'd need later down the line
God I love this girl
9 460mm 12 155mm
All diesel with 6 shaft. 33 knot speed
Iowa would shit itself

should ask the Germans
I thought they did
meanwhile the Germans having no trouble regularly exceeding their rated maintenance intervalls
Still have no idea what IJN Command is smoking with C-44
Suddenly go to three shafts from four on Agano
Maybe weight saving
Time to check the bible
With Yuubari being the lightweight of lightweights, and also using triple shaft
Soviets choose 3 shafts on Soyuz for belt protection or smh weird reason like that. Is that true for Agano? 
I could see that possibility
Were the Japanese light cruisers good at what they were purposed for?
for destroyer flotilla leading, I guess
but the moment they face something heavier, rip
japanese light cruisers are an interesting spectrum of ships which are designed to fulfil a certain niche role that they utterly failed at from the outset to somewhat more respectable, yet still less capable than their contemporaries
Oyodo for example was a mistake
Agano was the biggest mistake
agano was better than oyodo any day of the week
Yubari was good for when she was built
eh, unless we go for night battles I prefer the better artillery and AA of Ooyodo over the torpedo broadside on Agano
But Sirene
Ooyodo is heavier, yes, but as an individual unit she offers me more than Agano can
according to German wikipedia, they're gud botes
6 guns total on a 10'000t design
At least those six guns aren't shitty WWI thingies
true
Ooyodo was designed as SubRon flagship more than as your average light cruiser, I believe
I rather take an overweight but useful ship than a more tonnage efficient but utterly useless ship
designed 1908
The 15.5cm has, if nothing else, good pen
yes and that was a mistake
The 6" is just garbage
get rid of the submarine flotilla command bullshit and throw on an extra turret or two
agreed
but since this applies mostly to german ships
disagreed

noooo thats not what i meant
that's from Lacroix' book innit?
the bible, yes
I recognize the font
Hipper engages HMS Berwick
By the power of Drachinifel Berwick gets a handicap bonus for being the lighter ship
county always win 
Sure, Canberra
Ken't have a belt
Berwick ends up getting hit thrice, no hits on Hipper
yoink
But back on point, IJN command seems to realize SubRon flagships are bad at least
because both of those flagships are slated to become mega ducks
what's better
winning the war with a few hickups
or losing the war with every advantage imaginable
don't have to ask me twice
Yodo
she is a cute
Yubari
wait i didnt realise

what book is this?
yubari is 3k tons fully loaded
slight points to Tama for me
whose idea was that

being one of the very few IJN ships to use camouflage without being turned into a hulk
Yes, Yuubari was lighter than a bunch of DDs
anyway sendais my beloved
the bible
I hope you hate money
Ah fuck doesn't deliver to my country
Why Japanese ships have this "obsolete" feel on their superstructure designs
Except Yamato and Nagato
Also I have 0 money to spend on that so kek
yar har


I can send the PDF
Avast ye mates
dont advocate piracy friend

mods get mad
what can I do against you Richie?

rest in peace brave soul
But yea, you have your alternative way to get the book, you do you


don't @ me
66gb
🏃♂️
my books folder has some bangers
Daz a lot of books
Not just books, primary documents as well

@s
Including a massive inventory of Marine Nationale booklet of general plans
You need a cutaway of French ships, ping Riche or me, we got you covered
Wait what does the folder name mean? That's german right?
my folder is full of novel warship research
Send this file to Germany in 1935
Geheim oder nicht?
Folder name just says History
Ah
the decisive factor by air vice marshal Wrigley is one of my favourite books since it's effectively a deconstruction of interwar air-power theory and how air power doctrine should evolve
it's honestly banging
you know how awful it'd be to store 160GB on 1930s tech?
Yosh
Ok what if
You print it out as paper
Losing a turret to HE moment
You have the entire RM24 catalogued offline, have you?
nope
only those that I opened once after that one time invenio was offline for two weeks
and I regretted not saving anything
What's RM24?
correct
Reichs Marine 24
all my other books are on my (currently fucked) PC

pc fix yourself
German archive index for naval artillery for 1930ish to 1945
Bundesarchiv Reichsmarine 24 inventory, basically an inventory of untitled German equipment and their drawings
Twin 533mms 
So like drawings for the plan of the H class BBs and what not right?
the H-class drawings are very limited sadly
The O-class falls under the "Schlachtschiff" section too
Stuff like that
not even armor thicknesses
detailed turret armor blueprint for the Hipper class
Riche, I think the deck drawings are there for the H-class
or of course, the plan of all plans
Photo is not loading for me
that's how we came to the conclusion of a uniform 120mm turtledeck
it's 12MB, open it in browser
Still More popular than Project 24 despite she having more details 
and how everyone is wrong, including Garzke and Dulin
(and Stille still selling this bullshit to this day)
imagine having knowledge of your designs
and how we know H was meant to have a uniform 100mm deck
instead of this 100mm machinery and 120mm magazine stuff
You are wrong, good sir
Soviet BB development stopped at Soyuz, according to this book, you cannot refute it
I hate this book so much

Wait which BB had the thickest deck armor? Yamato had the thickest belt armor right?
do I want to know what they say about H-class?
Yamato had the thickest deck armor
Yami
followed by Richie and JB's 170 over the mags
200 on the flat, 230 on the slopes

Plus a wee bit extra on the backing
Don't pull a Jane's on me
But yea, I lost sleep last night
just to see "H-39 better than Lion because gERmAn AccUrAcY"
I can give a better rundown on the H-class than that, after drinking ten beers
Here's Montana:
Machinery Area ("Standard" comparison)
Vertical protection:
Main belt - 16.1" Class A @ 19 deg w/ 1" STS backing
Horizontal protection (Outboard):
Weather deck - 1.5" STS on 0.75" STS backing (2.07" STS equivalent)
Main armor deck - 6.1" STS on 1.25" STS backing (6.96" STS equivalent)
Third deck - 0.75" STS
Horizontal protection (Centerline):
Weather deck - 1.5" STS on 0.75" STS backing (2.07" STS equivalent)
Main armor deck - 5.8" STS on 1.25" STS backing (6.66" STS equivalent)
Third deck - 0.62" STS
Project 24 was 245mm 

Wait most BBs had inclined armor right? Which BBs didn't have inclined armor?
KGV, German BBs
sirene is slow
Soyuz 
Another question then: Why?
Vanguard as well
vanguard is not a BB
Why weren't they inclined?

Wanted more vertical height
the copium reason
German reasoning for that was that they wanted the belts to cover the waterline too
More slope means less space and lower height for weight
does anyone have that wonderful list from Mattzo where he compares vertical and inclined belt advantages?
emphasis on wonderful
I can find it
So something like Richelieu's arrangement was out of the question for them
well
you guys needed something deep enough to meet up with the bottom of the turtleback
The sloping position of the outer armor does not bring any significant advantages. The slight weight reduction for the same protection is outweighed by the vulnerability of the outer skin to even the lightest explosive shells, which can lead to considerable speed losses without affecting the vital parts of the ship in any way. If, on the other hand, increased penetration protection of the belt armor is to be achieved, it is suggested that a pre-armor of at least 60 mm, preferably 100 mm, be placed against the outer skin, and behind it, at a sufficient distance, a likewise vertical or nearly vertical armor of 250 to 300 mm be provided.
That was their stance on inclined belts
*Their stance on internal belts
Remind me where's this from? Garzke's US BBs? Friedman's values have some differences compared to what's listed (and on armour cross sections), not because of lb too.

Given enough time, even a Kriegsmarine engineer will re-invent Littorio

well, the inclined belt ships they had a decent look at as well as their own inclined belt ships (Deutschland class, Shitzig) had thin plating outside of the main belt at the waterline
Probably G&D
My Wifi is having a fit
Wait. Montana had 248mm deck armor then
That's 3 mm more than Proj 24 
Cope

also can we say the Germans would reinvent Littorio, when they had their hand in the development of Littorio's armor in the first place?

But no - doesn't check out with Jaba's figures
But Jaba said main deck is 5.8 not 6.1
look carefully, centreline and outboard

Oh
Forgot the # =mm conversion
Why outer has more armor
40# = 1" for US
Outboard has no superstructure, also usually has the 5" secondary mags underneath
cycle to prison
throw dynamite against SS officers
doesnt elaborate further
leaves
become mathematician professor and live until 2022
https://twitter.com/wrkclasshistory/status/1607406233312530433?s=20
#OtD 26 Dec 1943, communist partisan, Mario Fiorentini, cycled to the Regina Coeli prison in Rome and threw two kilos of TNT at the SS officers guarding the gates. Eight were killed, five instantly. Guards opened fire, but were unable to hit him as he pedalled away to safety
4117
639

This doesn't tell me much about the backing, though, or the weather deck values
Also outboard can be accessed by hitting the upper hull first, which is less resistant than the upper deck
Proud

Montana gained my respect more
SoDak also did this, though afaik Iowa did not
Well Iowa is not a battleship
it is the tried and true history of naval engineering that all will eventually return to the equilibrium of design that is Littorio
So Littorio is a crab
yes

🦀
do not quote stille
Who Inspired Project 24
Berwick describing how she drove off Admiral Hipper, 1940, colorized
Amiral Baudin inspired Brandenburg
Brandenburg inspired german pre dreads
leading to german dreadnoughts
leading to bismarck

I'm sorry
Fuuuu
stop being petty
It's hard to have a vs debates with her since other side will straight jump to armor quality
it is a pretty glaring flaw tbh
But it's still 60k tons of steel 
don't stoop so low Krem
atleast the KM and VMF get representation
Something something "Yamato had iron armor"
imagine
pft
1876 Inflexible fights Yamato
some ironclads could pen 1 meter of iron armor
Inflexible wins

Jane's Fighting Ships, 1942 edition
Because the Soviets bought the fact that Iowa has a 19" belt 
Yeah
For Soviets Iowa had
482mm belt
35 knot max speed
Higher penetration
So Project 24 needed to have
At least 30 knot speed
410mm belt armor with 20° slope
457mm/55 with autoloader and heavy AP was desired
Good job, Soviet Intelligence
I wonder how many teething problems that autoloader would have had
Soviet logic
So Iowa is a BB, which means she is designed against her own AP
Which means she must have amazing belt armor
But in truth. Iowa wasn't a true BB

Eh, give it enough time and they'll hammer it out....hopefully.
Stares at the British 4"-6" array
as with everything
Guess neither was Soyuz then 
It wouldn't be US level of reload of course
Weren't there only a few BBs able to survive their own shells?
Nah Soyuz had BB duties not a CV escort
Is this just referring to the DM 6 second reload 
I mean compare US 152mm with Soviet 152mm reload
Soviets were kinda jealous of US reload
I'll tell you a little secret
Like in war thunder you got
American 152mm having 10 round per minute
Soviet 152mm at 7.5
continuous chain hoists
And then along comes Nürnberg

Come to think of it, is Shitzig released yet?
no
or still in dev hell
In WT?
WoWS
Meanwhile Japan be like
Super spicy 15.5cm
But a ROF only slightly higher than a 20.3cm

What's the protection of the US 152mms?
french rof moment
6" at 45 deg iirc
Because the Japanese 15.5cm turret protection is very dame da ne
25mm, 32mm front

Per NavGleaps:
Turret armor thickness:
Brooklyn and St. Louis classes:
Face: 6.5 in (16.5 cm)
Sides: 1.25 in (3.8 cm)
Rear: 1.5 in (3.8 cm)
Roof: 2.0 in (5.1 cm)
Cleveland and Fargo classes:
Face: 6.5 in (16.5 cm)
Sides: 3.0 in (7.6 cm)
Rear: 1.5 in (3.8 cm)
Roof: 3.0 in (7.6 cm)
Wasn't it 165mm of turret face armor?
Brooklyn and St. Louis classes:
Face: 6.5 in (16.5 cm)
Sides: 1.25 in (3.8 cm)
Rear: 1.5 in (3.8 cm)
Roof: 2.0 in (5.1 cm)
Cleveland and Fargo classes:
Face: 6.5 in (16.5 cm)
Sides: 3.0 in (7.6 cm)
Rear: 1.5 in (3.8 cm)
Roof: 3.0 in (7.6 cm)
DAMMIT JABA
there we go, brain still at 12% capacity

Okay, protection is at least better than Mogami
face protection is wonderful on these
also wasn't the IJN turret 25mm all around?
most ships had their thickest armor on the turrets right?
Only 29 deg from vertical tho
If you're not British, yeah
All British turrets aspire to be a projectile
Why?
Why did the turrets have weaker armor?
Armor thickness for both twin and quad mountings as given in "Naval Weapons of World War Two" by John Campbell and ADM 234/271:
Face: 12.74 in (32.4 cm) (520 lbs.)
Fore Sides: 8.82 in (22.4 cm) (360 lbs.)
Rear Sides: 6.86 in (17.4 cm) (280 lbs.)
Rear: 6.86 in (17.4 cm) (280 lbs.)
Roof: 5.88 in (14.9 cm) (240 lbs.)
Floor 2.96 in (7.5 cm) (120 lbs.) plus 4.9 in (12.4 cm) (200 lbs.) sill plate in front of the gunhouse to protect the top of the barbette.
compared to 430mm of face armor on richie

457mm at 49.1 deg of Massy 

Project 66 with 9 220mm and 8 130mm DP guns designed to counter 203mm cruisers. DM was it's biggest problem and rival 


They trusted their flash protection
But yeah I never really understood it
choices
my bad, yea, 25mm all round
then comes to the Yamato modification and they got 32mm front plates and insulating panels all round
Mhm
still omega shit protection
Tfw the dud 5" shell still knocks your turret out
(and likely what eventually caused Yamato to blow up since a bomb hit there and set a fire)
Gangut good ending
I guess the British thought that with three quad turrets, loosing one turret still leaves you with eight guns
And then they cut two guns
The real "holy shit" moment for British turret protection is when you look at Nelson's scheme
none of the 152mm barbettes have any protection
weight, baby
so basically to try to go under the WNT, they gimped the armor of the Nelson?
Getting a 165mm deck for the mags was expensive
Either that or they're considered unnecessary
What about Warspite casemates
But time to remind Sirene of Bismarck's little 20mm pog hole on her 15cm turrets
Vertical belt enthousiasts mental gymnastics diagram

20mm pog hole?
take a look at this - what do you think is the problem?
only 20mm of armor on the lower barbette of the 15cm twins
The walls are 20mm, remember
very vulnerable to lolpens
huh
Fortunately only present on the forward pair of 15cm turrets
but still a very Bismarck moment
I wonder how this would read if it instead said
-Thinner armour is needed (say 11" rather than 14")
alongside the tomfuckery of her horizontal protection
Might get the point across better

I love being on the best team
france however did not know to join the internal or external inclined belt team
so they did the unthinkable and joined both
There was a half-arsed refute on that earlier, which I think Jaba saw already
I mean, besides Japan, didn't every country that did one do both
france did both at the same time
Hood and Nelson
NC and SD
Littorio and that dumbass curved cruiser belt
phoenix will be angry
Good
Here.
it's funny that Britain went for vertical belts for deeper protection
yet almost gets rekt when a diving shell pens under the belt
Luigi Amedeo Giuseppe Maria Ferdinando Francesco di Savoia, duca degli Abruzzi
thanks sirene 
Also, where is this insanity from?
Yeah, the Assbrushy
I imagine it got torn apart?
It's moreso a list of arguments the UK designers used
and Mattzo doesn't want to see the advantages of the inclined belts
Idk I just think "there would be trouble attaching framing to the outer face of the armor" is a funny one to include
Docking isn't exactly an issue if you just put bollards on the weather deck, is it?....
or if the situation calls for it, just....go Iowa's route?
Mattzo also made a list of issues with Richie
as far as the "richelieu on paper" vs "richelieu irl" argument is concerned I totally agree
The cable passage watertightness is a bit mean, since I think that was an issue everyone had
it's still an issue
Was about to say Littorio quite literally flooded to death via cable tunnels
as the sural boilers exist I'm sure france
or another navy
could've fixed cable tunnel flooding some way or another
Some of the criticisms are valid
Though the main point of "crashing the rate of fire" doesn't exactly ring to me - Generally, you need to observe the fall of shot, make adjustments, then open fire again anyway, at least in British practices when trying to do rangefinding
funny how "if she hit a mine" was a criticism to the engineering compartment though, because Richelieu did exactly that - the only negative effect is losing 3000 litres of wine
Overall, I think some of the criticisms here are partly because of "teething" problems of the main artillery
The more precise version of the objection would be to point out what % of the propulsion would be lost if a hit occurred at the transverse bulkheads between two machinery compartments—which is a valid point, and something that holds back, say, the New Orleans class with their grouped machinery layout instead of the prior and following unit layout
North Carolina also initially had serious vibration issues, and as far as I remember, the US went with different bladed props on each of the SoDaks until they arrived at the optimal solution on Alabama
"smokiness" is just a bit over the line though for the Sural boilers
Yeah that's nitpicky
with richie
we kind of got what we delivered
an unfinished BB
Honestly though, I'd probably add one more thing here though that's a bit more alarming
the ammo capacity for the 152mm guns

400 rounds per gun, for a total of 3600 is just.... over the top? 
Jean Bart was very lucky that the ammo storage was empty at the time
Nonsense, you can never have too deep of a 152mm magazine!
hides Boise taking a 203mm hit underneath the magazine belt into the 152mm magazine
Sodak had 152??

no, Richelieu
Oh ok
Yea, but you're still sitting on 62 thousand kg worth of powder, even Hood is only at 15 thousand 
yeah not sure what the idea there was
Probably to fend off smaller vessels from night attacks
but then again 150mm deck over it
You guys were expecting foes from all directions from the experience on the CTs, apparently
you don't always get to fight a BB with a radically new shell and gunnery doctrin compared to european BB's

Well, it was a response to Littorios
If it can pen that, anywhere else on the ship can be penned anyway 
not fucking Massy
So yea, understandable
The US BBs had hefty 5" loads too
But that makes sense because AA fire takes a shit-ton of shells and you need to Not Run Out Of Ammo While Being Bombed
glances at UK in Med
I remember British criticism towards the SoDaks on the Secbat
"oh, they're grouped together too much, that's bad"
yawn
2" armor, not like they're gonna sympathetic detonate from fragments
They ain't British casemates at Jutland 
Comparisons continued during the war, so that the designers of the final abortive British battleships in 1944–5 had to explain why their ship seemed to offer less on a greater displacement than the US Iowas. A British officer who visited the US Bureau of Ships in 1943 commented only that he could understand DNC’s comment and the perceived inferiority of US practices, but ‘their ships seem to sink no more quickly than ours’.
"US inferior lol"
Good meme
Ah, British casemates at Jutland, amazing stuff
cordite fire on casemate, entire starboard casemate battery knocked out and nearly blowing the main mags of Malaya
incredible

France was using rather thick strips of poudre B compared to british spaghetti cordite
we should've fought at Jutland

Franco-American alliance at Jutland against Grand Fleet

Nevada at Jutland
The French ships explode, the American ships can't kill anything, the British ships explode
let's go boys
French ships deflagrate
throwing turrets around
New york strips her left barrel
or was it her right barrel

Wyoming shoots at Lion but kills Queen Mary instead 
Beatty frantically signals the US squadron to stop firing, except confusing them and they fire harder

What have you done?
The curse
Daisen's just fucking weird overall, 1920ish look
40ish equipment with shitty homemade bofors 
Cursed
and half a takao glued to the side, I guess
there's one thing the French navy has that Germany doesn't in WW1
(gonna pause for a sec to get you guy's jokes out of the way)
let's see if this gets Hit's attention
other than HMS Incomparable, what Battlecruiser design was similar to Incomparable (large af guns but armor so thin basically paper)
Lex
Die-joubu
Just toss the whole British BC lineage in there
Aside from Hood ig
and G3, I think
HMS Incomparable was actually downscaled from 3x2 20" to 3x2 18"
and even a 3x2 16" if need be
Tru
Hood is a damn shame
because the rest of the Admirals would get the exchanged shell/powder room arrangement
just not Hood 
the 20" gun was simply a question by Fischer to Elswick as to what the biggest naval gun they could produce was
they replied a 20" gun of ~40 calibers in length and a weight of 200 tons
Speaking of British BCs, I have a Chinese book on British BCs, unfortunately bit of a shitshow
doesn't even show Repulse's fridge door torpedoes on the diagrams 
(Don't even ask about Renown, deleted entirely)
fridge door torpedoes?
Wait they had torpedoes?
Hood's torpedo tubes at one point was the leading theory to "why Hood was lost"
Torpedoes were common on capital ships up until about the '20s
ah
The USN occasionally did torpedo practice launches with the battleline
They usually went poorly
what was the last US ship to have torps?
Sometimes the torps even ran circular back to the battleline
US BB, you mean?
All the way until Colorado, the tubes were removed during refits
ah
German big brains still use torpedo tubes on H-39 though
Can't use too much ammo to kill those pesky frieghters
Like Jervis Bay
Soyuz had Hydro 
use more expensive and rare ammo instead
Save ammo, use an expensive device with motor strapped to it instead.
sang and I are one being
but only sang got emote


How modern ramming bow would look like
This is stupid but where there any dreadnoughts that had uh the same hull type as the Zumwalt destroyer?
We're just like reddit. The same comment twice but one gets upvoted and the other downvoted.
Zumwalt's emphasis is on stealth, and was based on an experimental hull earlier
Yeah I know but where there any tumblehome dreadnoughts?
I vaguely remember the pre-dreadnoughts have it but idk if there were any dreadnought designs that were tumblehome
plenty of dreadnoughts had inwardly inclined sides
I remember seeing some interesting charts with ships penning eachother range and torpedoes being used to cover the closer ranges.
actually most did
Wait, let me get that woke russian design
but there's a difference between a tumblehome and such inclines
so no dreadnought designs were tumblehome?
pretty much
like even planned/cancelled ones?
Not the internal vertical-sloped belt one right
is he getting Bubov?
da!
But yea, Sevastopol from a quick glance is also inwardly sloped, but not tumblehome
Yeah, that's just Michael Jackson
yeehee
Another question, why were some French pre-dreadnoughts tumblehome?
because it improved the firing angles of the secondary battery
I remember someone mentioning a specific reason for this layout
but mostly it is a result of them choosing for a lozenge style arrangement on their 2nd class of pre dreadnoughts
Being extra kind to those soft-capped shells that need under 20 deg obliquity to function
lozenge? what's a lozenge style arrangement
diamond style gun layout
T
T T
T
USS Brooklyn is a very good example of this arrangement
didn't dreadnought also have this gun arrangement?
Wait what was the last Dreadnought to have wing turrets?
also, on dreadnought those wing turrets were on a separate deck
might be Courbet or Rivadavia

Also why did earlier dreadnoughts have wing turrets
when the secondary battery of earlier pre dreadoughts was made into a uniform main armament, it meant that the sides of the ships which had the secondary battery was already adjusted to having magazines and barbettes
Bow needed to be tall and they also needed 4 guns forward
this allowed for quick transition to dreadnought style ships while retaining the engine and machinery layouts of prior designs
There were concerns over superfiring as well IIRC
South Carolina didn't give a shit, naturally
yeah it wasn't done except that one time with a secondary gun on Henri IV
so to suddenly go to superfiring main guns they'd need a more gradual shift
unless you're america
US also had experience with superfiring already with the silly gun mounts like the Virginias
The one with a smol gun on top of main battery?
Yes. Not sucessful.
It looks goofy as fuck
it did teach the USN a lot about hoists
and they used this in the brooklyns
When the superfiring tops fired, the shockwaves seriously impacted the crew on the bottom turret
Kearsarge
Hampered reloading rate and is generally more an obstacle
Wait were there any plans to have over and under main guns on a turret instead of side by side?
Break out the Japanese
Any pics of the ship or of the design?
This is what peak gunplacement looks like.
?
Okay okay... So I can't believe I even had this thought. I'm not really taking myself seriously here but...
RMS Olympic and/or Britannic...
I mean the al devs seem like the type to add joke ships
Not a 'real' design
wow, party pooper
Didn't Ansaldo make those quadruple turrets?
Italian and Soviet designs
Soviets had quad 100mm and 130mm for that
Italians gone bigger
fuck, I can't find the pic again
Ansaldo i mean as for Italy
that looks like a pain to actually use
sideways superfiring
based
There we go
These are the Ansaldo mounts I mentioned
or, Japanese. Not much information on them, apparently.
might be able to ID the origin by comparing the barrel construction with Japanese and italian practice
kinda screams Italian to me
specifically the 381/40
o..oh dear...
the 4 of them in a square look made me think that this was a gatling gun or smth
It's Hiraga's copium again

These are all 41cm gun designs
And for Kongo Daikan, apparently
so it gets wackier for that boat
And here is the Soviet 100mm BL-127 
I feel like someone is forgetting the Italian twin 76mm over under
Kongo Daikan is the opposite of Bismarck
in what way
looking at this makes me wonder, with today's technology is it possible to make like a 100+ mm rotary cannons and place it on a ship?
Redundancy is optional
And no not a CIWS but a gun like the 5in gun on US destroyers
Tonnage efficiency is all that a ship needs
Sirene you use that word so often nowadays
Hipper:



















