#history
1 messages · Page 39 of 1
bing chilling
30 years ago so counts as history

doesn't the tier 8 also have a stupid derp gun?
Developer Diaries: China Heavy Tanks with mechanics: rocket boosters | WOT 2023
Сайт: https://wotexpress.info
Сообщество ВКонтакте: https://vk.com/wotclue
Яндекс.Дзен: https://zen.yandex.ru/wotexpress
Telegram: https://t.me/Wotclue
Подпишись на канал: http://www.youtube.com/Wotclue
_________________________________________...
yep, 160mm
did they put this fucking thing
on a chinese HT
that's the only 160mm artillery piece i can find in chinese service

except it's a mortar...
The fucks this
Oh wtf i didnt even notice the boosters
https://twitter.com/MON_GOV_PL/status/1599848915825827842
https://twitter.com/MON_GOV_PL/status/1599851790698221574
tbf, they are kind of overrated
the reaction on the wot subreddit was pretty extreme but it's not really that powerful
Bofors 57 mm Naval Automatic Gun L/60 (Swedish: 57 mm sjöautomatkanon L/60 (57 mm SAK 60)), also known as 57 mm/60 (2.25") SAK Model 1950 and the like (full English product name: Bofors 57 mm Automatic A.A. Gun L/60 In Stabilized Twin Turret), was a twin-barreled 57 mm (2.2 in) caliber fully automatic dual purpose naval artillery piece designed ...
this the new UR gun right?
Nope
V-280 fits easily within FM-57-38's guidance for distance between aircraft at an LZ
Yes

TL;DL: V-280 fits the same number of aircraft into the same footprint as with normal helicopters
I hope it's something to finally use UR AA BPs on?
yea ur aa gun crafted in gear lab
About time.
Aw man i had hopes for defiant or what was the big one called
Idk tiltrotors are speed but sometimes a more helicopter like form may be desired? Idk some low speed tricks or maritime asw?
Tiltrotor can do those too you know
Even better than a helicopter in quite a few cases
Like being able to yaw while hovering in both directions equally well
This one
smol gun
new UR gun?
yes
have i missed something?
oh
French gear lab tree
- georgia gun in it
plus they are adding
"timed fuse" AA guns
tldr
pog
new gear, french tree with UR gear
VT fuze to exisintg aa guns
pr2 gears coming
new opsi lore
az meta
yeah that's about it
also the flying pancake
and a british CA gun that im not sure of
it's a Mk10 version of Albemarle gun
so idk
So apparently Bofors 57mm VT was available from 1964. ~~thank god it wasnt a year later or I get warned for breaking the 20-year rule in here
~~
One day
Yes, I was talking about this yesterday of how france never got vt fuzes on theirs bc they only became available in 1964
When JB was a school ship
Though it should be possible that the T-47’s and T-53’s had em
bruh
i thought all this time that rio de janeiro was still brazil's capital
i play too much hoi4

Now tell me what Switzerland's capital is.
Béarn
Wrong 
Zurich?
Wronger 
it's Bern but it looks like Béarn
Switzercenter
but actually Switzerland has no capital
True, but also false.
The capital of Switzerland is S.



Bofors? I thought they only have the 40mm one
Is this a new gun?

Poor Bofors
People always think it's a gun and not a company.
I guess that's the price of succes
Honestly, I kinda forget the Bofors was a thing due to everyone using SAM nowadays
Bofors is split IIRC
bofors made quite a few guns
The only reason I remembered it because the AC-130 still using it
Eaten up by SAAB and BAE
Dorn, you can't build the Imperial Palace if you can't get the weapon emplacement right!
America so rich they can make a bunch of useless shit and still having a good time with it
Just use the Hydra guns
Big E should have give Perty the task instead

Nah, that little shit is a manchild
it got dropped
Remember Iron Cage?
Really? Are they finally replaced it with something else?
No
Bushmaster? Isn't that the main gun for the Bradley IFV?
variable time fuzes
25mm Bushmaster
they made pretty good destroyer sized guns too
Bushmaster II is 30mm
they explode when in close proximity with planes
and does this big funny
Orbital ATK MK44 30mm BUSHMASTER II fired from Kongsberg MCT-30 turret on GDLS LAV at Orbital ATK's BUSHMASTER Users Conference earlier this year. For more info: www.monch.com and http://www.monch.com/mpg/news/14-land/724-orbital-atk-progress-through-partnerships.html
"fuck your trench"
true, their 12 and 15 cm guns good
yes but you don't have to set the fuze

based off the laser rangefinder return

the VT
Air burst, not necessary use strictly in AA, really scary when use against infantry

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=of0fJYDAB00 @fervent wyvern
A brief explanation of the VT or radio proximity fuze, a secret technology developed by the British and US scientists during WWII.
To find out more visit:
http://www.jhuapl.edu/aboutapl/defining-innovations/
watch this
And the USN continues being fuck all important
?
Japan basically zero chance outside of doing kamikaze in late war
Like, I'm still not far in
so is that what all that flak like smoke is when you set priority sector
no
It hasnt been a month in the pacific and the USN is retreating as far as they could
no shit?
Just watched the movie Roaring Currents, admiral Yi Sun-sin is pretty badass, carrying Korea like some top tier player help a bunch of noobs in a LoL match
Flak is German for AA gun but is often attributed to the clouds of exploding AA shells.
There's 3 types of fuze common in AA.
Impact
Timed
And Proximity, also known as Variable Time (VT)
You know who should have been the biggest baddie in movie? Not the Japanese but the Korean royal court.
Like my dude Yi single handly holding back the Japanese and he have turtle ship but the court sack him and appoint an idiot that proceed to lose the whole Korean fleet in one single battle
The dude is basically General Flavius Belisarius of Korea, being stab in the back while still kicking enemy butt to protect his country. Those kind of man are rare, Konstantin Konstantinovich Rokossovsky is another person I could think of that is in similar circumstances

Imho, Belisarius get too cocky after he retake Rome, Naboo is much better general. Yi on the other is a more loyal man, dude got sack so many time that I won't fault him if he do some revenge shit but my man don't care about petty feud but only focus on beating the Japanese.
Man the USN 
"We need a unified command!"
"I refuse to take orders!"
Heck
Do you want to take order from MacArthur?
Ehhh, I won't said Belisarius got too cocky and more like Justinian listened to too much bullshit from the court about Belisarius being a traitor and stuff like that. Not too mention that while Narses have done an excellent job in the final part of the war, putting him and Belisarius together is basically waiting for a disaster to happen
McCunter hasnt shown his face yet. Though his idiocy has.
who wants some cope from the worst news site i discovered this year
Well, that Byzantine court for you, there's a reason why it become the meaning of cutthroat politic.
Constantinople politics is as messy as Rome back in the Augustus days. There is a reason why the Eastern Roman Emperor loved the Varangian Guard so much
Isn't they refuse to fight only one time bc the Emperor can't pay them anymore?
random question
in the 2 movies midway and pearl harbor
they both have the doolittle scene
but they both are completely different
in pearl harbor its like they are running for their lives to get ready to launch and the secondaries of the carrier are shooting at stuff and all that
and then in midway its just like oh no we were spotted time to go and then they left
which one is more accurate
did pearl harbor hype that whole scene up way too much or did midway just not put much focus in that scene

Midway is more accurate about Doolittle
Yeah, from what I remember that's more of the case
Well, the Emperor is only person who paid them so as long as he have money, they will neve betray him, their loyalty is a reputation of its own. Unlike the shitty Praetorian Guards that even sell the Emperor title like some kind lemonade on the street.

Once spotted, getting closer with a carrier becomes more risky so they launched a bit earlier than planned
I mean, if you let a japan patrol ship get close enough to the carrier task group then you have a real issue with recon.
the scene from pearl harbor was awesome
but yea i guess midway scene was probably more accurate
If you scout and your scout gets spotted its the same thing as having your carrier spotted when it comes to such an operation.
I mean, seeing Hornet secondary firing look cool but it really stupid if a CV have to use her secondary
They rarely ask for a pay raise but Varangian did have the right for the 1st loot, it is good enough for them. It also help that they are composed of so many aspiring viking and rus warlord that you don't get to worry about them unite to scheme against you.
does seem pretty inaccurate
perfectly clear sunny day
only saw the ship when it got this close (im assuming thats the enemy ship)
and theres no other escort ships

halsey ordering the cruisers to open fire
cruisers left the game
They don't have to ask but the moment you become a Varangian, you always gonna get top paid and lived in luxury. A lot of vikings even bring the wealth back to their homeland to become a local duke or rise up to be a king like Harold Harada
The Nashville get the kill iirc
what about the part when they were taking guns off the plane and replacing with broomsticks
is that accurate cause it didnt look like they did that in midway
They did modify the bomber by remove radios and belly turret for more fuel tanks. Maybe not improvise like in the movie but they were modified B-25

The guns were in fact replaced by wooden dummies
All to decrease take off length and increase range
Part of the modification I think
Part of the modification iirc, also the bombload was reduce as well.
No sane man would not modify a B-25 like hell before putting it on a carrier
Funny thing about Doolittle raid, without it, Japan military will still bickering among themselves about whether or not attacking midway.

It did set the IJA/IJN conflict straight...er... somewhat
Probably some china-shill or anti-US rhetoric.
This isn't quite true
Yamamoto's plan for Midway was approved before the Doolittle raid took place
To clarify:
VT (Variable Time) was the US designation for proximity fuzes.
Before VT fuzes, fuzes could be either contact or timed—either they only initiate after hitting something, or they initiate a set number of seconds after leaving the barrel. Note that contact vs. timed is different from delay vs. non-delay (or instantaneous) fuze, which is how long the wait between initiation of the fuze and the projectile exploding is.
VT fuzes added a new type of delay. They had a miniature radar in the nose that sent out radio pulses after being fired out of the barrel. When the radar return was sufficiently strong (indicating a nearby object), the fuze would initiate and cause the projectile to explode. The desired return was calibrated to have a high probability of damaging or destroying the assumed target (a metal monoplane within a certain speed range).
The USN considered the fuze to be 7 times as effective as the old timed fuzes for AA work, but they had their own caveats.
First, unliked timed fuzes, there was no way to tell how badly you missed so that you could correct your aim—so the USN eventually came up with a ratio of ~3:1 VT to timed fuze when firing AA, so that the timed bursts would give a visual indicator of how accurate the shooting was. This had the side benefit of also looking scarier to the enemy pilots, and hopefully making them less likely to press the attack home.
Second, VT fuzes had to be calibrated for a specific radar return strength and an expected target location at time of detonation, so stuff with a smaller radar return and going at unusual speeds could be much harder to destroy (until new shells with the right settings could be used). This allowed the Japanese in a few cases to use wood and cloth biplanes as kamikazes at night, as they were hard to spot on early warning radars and hard to kill with normal VT fuzes. The Japanese planned to convert hundreds of such aircraft to kamikazes for the expected invasion of Japan.
Third, VT fuzes are inherently more complex and less reliable than simple contact or time fuzes, meaning a higher dud rate (VT fuzes had a minimum 70% reliability rate for most of the latter half of WWII, though the average was higher. The comparable figures for contact and time fuzes was around 95%).
Fourth, VT fuzes rely on miniaturization of radar tech (specifically vacuum tubes), and those are vulnerable to breaking when fired out of a gun at enormous speeds. So only larger shells initially had VT fuzes (initially 5", but eventually down to 3" towards the end of the war), and only a nation with immense industrial capacity could mass produce them in sufficient quantity for them to become standard issue—thus the US's great industrial strength was just as important as the science and tech in turning the VT fuze from idea into a war-changing weapon.

By the way, while the fuze was considered seven times as effective as the time fuze, the number of shells needed to down each Japanese plane only fell by about half. The reason for this is that the increased lethality forced the Japanese to change their tactics, flying more evasively and often in smaller packets from multiple directions and hiding in the radar clutter of nearby land, as well as releasing weapons from further out. This (along with the deaths of more and more experienced pilots) contributed to falling hit rates amongst Japanese bombers compared to their early war achievements.
In the hands of the British, the VT fuze was also highly effective in defeating the V-1 "Buzz Bomb" attacks launched by Germany
The first live-fire testing at sea of the VT fuze was done in late 1942 aboard USS Cleveland (so effective was it that they destroyed all the target drones before they could complete all the testing), and the first combat kill was in early 1943 by USS Helena

To be fair, the F-35 underperforms in some roles vital to the RAAF
First and foremost is anti-shipping
Block 5 F-35s (the ones currently used by RAAF) do not have integration with current gen anti-shipping missiles like JSM and LRASM, afaik mass produced integration isn't scheduled until 2024 which will mean we'll need to upgrade our current airframes
We are planning on a squadron of these F-35s with that integration but at present we still have the Super Hornets to fill that role, overall meaning the RAAFs anti-shipping capability is at an all time low
Also there's some issues with operating out of some civilian airfields that the RAAF likes to use during interstate transit apparently due to it having a higher ground pressure than the old Hornets, although tbqh that's a very surmountable issue
F-35 wasn't a mistake but that reduction in anti-shipping capability for the RAAF would have been much better if it had been avoided
Eurasian times is a shitty website overall no clue where it came from it's just been showing up in my news feed the last few months
Eurasian times article seems to be saying broadly similar things to me although it heavily embellishes the language used
And also 2 of our planned 96 aircraft won't be able to be upgraded with better software? Wtf kind of point is that
Worst case scenario we relegate them to conversion training but I find it hard to believe they can't be upgraded at all
I'm trying to find a specific Eisenhower qoute. Been looking for like an hour and I'm starting to doubt if it was even said by him or anyone at all.
Definitely post war so perhaps during his presidency.
If I remember correctly it was during a speech outside and the weather was not so great. The qoute is relating to the weather and how he's not cared about the weather since June 1944 or how he considers every weather since d day good weather.
It's a super minor thing but I really want to find it.
Pretty sure the first time I saw that was in a video. But I've been looking for so long now that I'm starting to doubt if it's real at all.
Would appreciate if anyone could confirm that I'm not going crazy and that he or someone else did indeed say something along those lines at some point.
Where my fluid dynamic experts. I need to extend the data from Hoffmann's articles from 14 to 16k ton and 32 to 34kts. 
The review of data collected in the AJAX trials to test vibration and noise fixes proposed by General Dynamics has now concluded. The result was positive: noise and vibration levels remained within safe levels. AJAX will now progress to Reliability Growth Trials in January.
AJAX? But they canned that project 50 years ago 

It started and died in 1974 
https://twitter.com/MON_GOV_PL/status/1600052578208841728
https://twitter.com/MON_GOV_PL/status/1600071412013596672
I was going to make a joke about The National Intrest until I read "This year" carry on
Sorry for the exceptionally late reply as I have gotten very sick, that's a 2A7+.
Pretty predictable honestly, SB-1 while having things going for it was a far less well executed program (they missed several deadlines, V-280 was ahead of all of them), and this order is critical for keeping Bell in the military airframer business. Sikorsky won't be going anywhere, and while Boeing is in a very bad place as a company (it is honestly a gamble if they are still in business 10 years from now) - the problems are far deeper than winning this one contract could solve.
Defiant was worse in every performance statistic
In terms of foot print
Valor isn’t at all bad
Do hope the innovations made on the valor get moved over to some type of super osprey or osprey II
Valor winning wasn't surprising one bit even though I favor compound helos over tiltrotors
SB-1 has been a programmatic mess
Missed basically every deadline...
On top of being worse in every performance statistic
Since the valor can go further, while being faster and carry more
It honestly shouldn't be surprising at this point that a Boeing-involved program is a mess. Company is in shambles.
What happens when you have a company that used be ran by engineers ran by corpos instead
eh at least the F-15EX is still proving to be rather promising
Google images is fucking useless for finding pics of the 2a7+ with 122 roofs
Anyway
Look at this guy
The rotor turns into a wing
Dont call it ugly tho
patlabor helicopters
Allegedly the dragonfly had pitch up problems during transitions but that doesnt sound like something a little fuselage and engine placement modification cant overcome
All 2A7+s have the 122 roofs even if it is hard to tell, they are built using the Leopard 2 Improved hull & turret.
Say this model cover, i cant see it, maybe the extra turret side armour obscures it?
It is normally covered by the turret side applique, yes

There's people that are happy with that decision
Which i reached the point of constant stomachache fighting with those
Why did Hitler declare war on the United States in December 1941? The Red Army was counter-attacking on the Eastern Front, the treaty with the Japanese did not require him to declare war and previously he avoided hostilities with the United States repeatedly and instructed particularly the Kriegsmarine to "stand down". So why did Hitler declare ...
That was a rare occasion
Most cases were the opposite (X country declaring war on Germany)
Well
Probably there was another exceptions i forgot
Correct me if nedded
The Dutch declared war on both Italy and Japan first 

Although i was more thinking of a member of the Axis (germany mostly)
Declaring war on someone
I remember a case from WWI
Germany declared war on Portugal
Huh
You'd think that'd be because Britain was involved.
But Britain technically fought an offensive war 
There was already skirmishes between Portuguese and German colonial troops in Angola since 1914
And then tensions rose due to the unrestricted Submarine Warfare
The declaration of war by Germany happened after Portugal confiscated german and Austro-Hungarian ships in Portuguese ports
In 1916
I think that even if Hitler hadn’t declared war (which mhs suggests that wouldn’t have happened had the situation developed for a further one to two weeks) the involvement of Britain in the pacific war would’ve brought US fully alongside Britain, and consequently against Germany, especially since casus belli already exists with the Atlantic skirmishes)
The US was mostly fighting its own public opinion.
I doubt that if Germany didn't declare war upon them, the public wouldn't be too dismayed that the US also officially enter against the European Axis forces to which the Japanese were cozying up with.

By 1941?
No, not really
Then why did they deny arms sales to the DEI 
Also; wasn’t dei campaign after Pearl? What does that have to do with prewar America
Because the purchases were pre pearl
Yes because most were sold to other countries after being paid for already 
No?
So there wasn’t a denial of arms sales
Because they did sell planes

There was a denial of most sales. And the planes almost got denied as well because, amongst many reasons, the Americans weren't sure if the Dutch were Nazis. 
So then why were there 71 B-339s, 24 H-75s, 24 CW-21s, and 6 squadrons (58 aircraft) of Martin B-10s in the DEI?
Boohoo, those Americans only sold us hundreds of planes
whoops
Cleve, you need to let the wild Europeans have their daily dose of America bad
SMH
How would they live without it ?
Qwerty on defense of US 
oh shit im right on time for the counterjerking
Join the war when it starts next time
More lend lease, now

Chat got abandoned faster than the allies abandoned Poland
Oh wait
I only have the MLD data, not the LVA of the KNIL.
Of the ordered 36 Catalinas, 12 Amphibcal Catalinas, 48 Ryan STM-S 2, 24 Beechcfact trainers, 48 Douglas DB 7 C and 24 Vought-Sikorsky VS 310.
Of which were delivered to the Indies:
The 48 Ryan STM-S 2s and 18 (minus 2 lost in transit) of the 36 Catalinas
Ok?
the pinnacle of discussion as usual
I mean, when the starting point is claiming that the US was denying arms sales then devolves into counting up exactly how many hundred aircraft the USS delivered compared to what was ordered...
I dont exactly have the other data on hand. Just citations. And I'm not through the book yet either.
How did that go
France placed their orders late
Which resulted in the British needing to learn metric when they took over most of the orders
And also the funny French reversed throttles
(The US Congress allowed the export of Vought’s V-156-F to France, but blocked export of the bomb bay mechanism on national security grounds. The French were forced to make do with two external bombs.)
Sounds about something the US would do
didn't pretz literally debunk this
given it was just a shitty trapeze thing this is one of the strangest conditions ive
ever seen
Probably
I seem to recall that happening
something to do with the french having their own version they were going to install anyway iirc
as far as im aware the "security reasons" were the reason they replaced it
the original sin
While based on the earlier SB2U-2, the V-156-F featured a number of changes to meet the needs of the French Navy. The throttle was reversed so that it operated in the opposite way from U.S. standards (full power in the rearmost position) and metric instrumentation replaced U.S. instruments. French radio equipment was installed in place of American radios and French Darne 7.5-mm machine guns replaced the U.S. .30-caliber machine-guns. The French were not allowed to use the Vought bomb displacement gear (for security reasons) and it was deleted with the understanding that French Alkan equipment would be installed after the aircraft were delivered. By May of 1940 this equipment had still not been installed so most French V-156-F combat missions were carried out using only the underwing bomb racks. One other feature of the V-156-F was that wing-mounted fence-type dive brakes (rejected by the U.S. Navy) were installed on the V-156-F.
smacks the bofors with tf2 wrench
Reminds me of french blueprints that were converted to imperial for the US shipbuilders

Imagine still insisting on Imperial 
and it was deleted with the understanding that French Alkan equipment would be installed after the aircraft were delivered.
yeh
Too late to change now I guess
Y they so interested in feet ova der
meter is what caused fdg
Imagine having to change all those drill bit sizes
Imperial is based 12. So it's kind of based like that. It just has a less fancy arbitrary base unit of measurement.
my ancestors smile on me imperial
yeah but
Imperial is very handy for naval fans looking to buy a laptop
the previous part
US: We are free from Imperialism
EU: Why you still use Imperialist measurements
US: >:(
that just says they had an actual plan to replace it
so the plane wasnt basically garbage
What's " for 380
lmao
14.9?

POV: The La Gal’s on trial run doing 35 kts (designed for 31)
POV: USS Timmerman
POV: Zukhov in 1944
the sailors hitting full throttle with the expectation of middling speed:
every engineer spitting out their coffee upon hearing what happened:
In an alternative world 
God we love boats

Indeed 
I own a few boats, a few boat models, what makes you say I love boats
shows you a picture of Nevada
tries to offer it a hot dog out of instinctual affection

I have something to discuss
I'm listening
Fuck you
P-38ifies YF-23
impressive bow cannon
Saigon||deez||
I’m sorry
Model 2500 ye
for what? bringing heaven to earth?
Refurbishing boss: "Wow Sanglune you sure know your laptop screens"
Right... Laptop screens...
it matters little in this case, it's beautiful
manmade horrors beyond my comprehension
So they say
Like the meter was originally defined as the length of a metal rod made by the French. It's only recently that it was contorted to be a """natural""" unit based upon the distance light travels in an absurd factional of a second.
And the kilogram still isn't defined.
Didn’t they want to base it on a sphere of silicon
You could just as easily have ended up with a metrication of avoirdupois units
But we do
Only the French purposefully set out to divorce their new system from the British as much as possible
Tu as du pois
In "Storia Militare" n. 196 (January 2010) Enrico Cernuschi described the unknown project of an early Italian helicopter/VTOL carrier of 60's.
During 1965 the Italian Navy seriously considered the possibility to modify the proposed second "Vittorio Veneto" cruiser into a sort of small carrier, dubbed "Trieste".
The ship should share the same hull of Veneto as much the same engines and most of its armament, included Terrier missiles launch pad.The ship should be 190 meters of lenght, 20 meters of width and 9,000 tons of mass.
The ship should be also equipped with a couple of SPG-55C radars (as the Vittorio Veneto did), and with 4 OTO Melara 127/54 cannons and also other 4 ones of 76/62.
A relatively small landing deck would allows helicopter and VTOL fighter operations (most notably the VAK-191B for Italian Navy), with a lower hangar able to host at least up to 12 helicopters/aircrafts.
The island would be also small, at least 15 meters lenght and 8 meters width.
The helicopters would be the Agusta/Sikorsky SH-3D (as later embarched on Garibaldi).
The ship would have one only elevator placed backward, designed aroud the VAK-191.The project ended in 1966 since Italian Government decided to use the money allocated for the Trieste to build a new nuclear 18.000 ship dubbed "Enrico Fermi".
In September 1970 even the Fermi project was stopped and the funds were exploited to allow Italy to join the MRCA Panavia Tornado programme.If built and launched the Trieste would give a first carrier to Italy at least 15 years before the actual Giuseppe Garibaldi. With the end of VAK-191 programme, Italian Navy could choose between the Sea Harrier or the AV-8A (as already Spain did). Someone noted that probably the deck would be extended to the whole hull respect the original drawings (removing all the armaments) giving the Trieste much like a Garibaldi look.
Which is respectable
It’s a good system
based
Now I get to order in metric ounces and pounds.
Mig-29 and Su-27 mommy 
@maiden citrus ok hear me out
Where 772
You already do?
The US pound is federally defined as a value of kilos
Ayay
Ok but krem my plane is real
where is it
Smaller than it looks
A pound was 1000g de jure but now is 500g de facto. Not sure what an ounce was but now it's 100g here.

Fortunately I dont have to deal with the pre metric mess of Dutch units too often
I heard wonderful things
Grokhovsky G-38 
What about S-37? 
An integrated electro-optical system and defensive aids suite (DAS) were also planned, today technologies found on the F-35. Unlike the F-35 it also had 800kg of armour plate for the pilot and other sensitive areas. To reduce vulnerability on the ground it also, oddly for a non-naval aircraft, had folding wingtips allowing more to be packed into a hardened air shelter
Aids

Wat

Reread your first sentence
A defensive aide suite (DAS) is a military aircraft system which defends it from attack by surface-to-air missiles, air-to-air missiles and guided anti-aircraft artillery. A DAS typically comprises chaff, flares, and electronic countermeasures combined with radar warning receivers to detect threats. On some modern aircraft (Lockheed Martin F-35 ...
Sigh
Imagine
Frens
Fren

Thicker than she looks
You know what's thicker? 
my heart
Jesus christ what the fuck no
Now it's China's turn to make this picture real
Imagine
US actually uses the US Customary system and not Imperial
Some stuff is the same but some ain't
Both the British Imperial and United States customary systems of measurement derive from earlier English systems used in the Middle Ages, that were the result of a combination of the local Anglo-Saxon units inherited from Germanic tribes and Roman units brought by William the Conqueror after the Norman Conquest of England in 1066.
Having this sh...
Having this shared heritage, the two systems are quite similar, but there are differences. The US customary system is based on English systems of the 18th century, while the Imperial system was defined in 1824, almost a half-century after American independence.
Kinda like how humans and apes have a shared common ancestor but neither evolved from the other
Basically: the US uses an even older and crustier version of the British system
I must apologize, but whenever goofy ah French plane prototypes are shown off
The Coléoptère must be posted
What the fuck
Does anyone know where I might find the Aberdeen t34 report
all I’m finding rn are blogs talking about it
and I trust those less than I trust gas station sushi
Sorry I'm very late but
Can this help?
"In the T-34-85 the diameter of the ring was widened to 1,600 millimeters, which allowed to place three men and an 85 mm gun in its enlarged turret. In comparison, the diameter of the turret ring on the Sherman Tank was 1,753 millimeters. This provided its crew more than 1.5 times the ‘living space’ of the T-34. Thus, it is not surprising that the Americans did not understand how it was possible for the T-34 tankers to arrange themselves in it"
Meanwhile 76mm t34 was 1,420 millimeters
The Soviet report about the Aberdeen tests noted that they had never encountered more meticulous and pedantic tank maintenance technicians than the Americans. 
I used to think this kind of bombers could only exist in Wolfenstein for some reason

I think the most common explanation for T-34 low comfortability is due to the short lifespan it have where the tank was expected to lasted a few days at most.
Not sure how reliable that claim is though, I remembered Glantz didn't agreed much with that notion.
false notion. Tank building is expensive and lengthy no matter the design, making a tank that only last a few days is a gross waste of resources. This goes for everyone
the T-34 is uncomfortable yes, and early on many factories churned out examples with overall low qualities, but the design itself is quite reliable and longlasting
also @ivory ridge question, why does Italian ships rarely uses any Roman names outside of Caesar? I don't remember any ships ever being named Trajan, Diocletian or Didius Julianus
Today’s the day
oh shit yeah today's the day

Just gonna quote Phoenix for this one
Something something Mare Nostrum
oh fr shit i forgot todays the day lol
ah I see
so Mussolini's Romaboo tendencies is to blame
just use Frankish ones 4head
Merovingian has a good ring to it
Kinda weird that the USSR have the T-72B but then later Russia decided to named the next upgrade as T-90
in the end Russia kept upgrading both separately either way
Soviet Union collapsed at the stage where next gen MBTS were being tested
New Russia couldn't afford such programs
So yeah T-72 upgrade being T-90 is smh
It's like the Challenger 3
You know it's a Chal 2 as core
But got some new stuff and number for PR
the T-72B3 is from a decade after the first T-90 with the welded turret rolled out
the B3 obr. 2016 is from the same year as the t-90M
T-80BVM 
You either have models of many tanks or just 1 main tank.
Poland is doing multiple for example
While US sticks to Abrams only
With new light tank project as smh I guess
Sometime I think that while there are numerous upgrades now, the T-90 original design is from T-72 which is very old at this point, even M1 Abrams is younger than that
Which T-72 related to T-64
It's a fundamental problem ye
Soviets were going to replace that with 152mm MBT projects
Especially beings like Object 195
But well it collapsed before that 
Hold on, I thought the T-64 is a seperated program that end up as T-80? Or did I got it wrong with the T-62?
T-72= T-64 but actually cheap and more reliable
T-80= T-64+ T-72
the t-80 is directly related to the 64, same autoloader different engine
the t-72 is "based" on the 64 by being a similar concept made to be cheaper
Yeah T-64 was quality while T-72 turned it to quantity ish
Wait, so is the T-62 a seperate thing alltogether or did it come from the T-55?
T-62 doesn't have autoloader
T-64 Does
So T-62 is better T-55 and cheap
T-64 is much better T-55 and expensive
Only through this conversation, that I even remembered T-64 was a thing. I used to thing T-62 is the only mass produced tank in its generation
TBH, American tank is much easier to remember during the Cold War
Given 13k T-64 was build. Im surprised
What about their variants?
I guess because most games I played only included the T-62 but not T-64
World of tanks I see
Well, its got more complicated than that but hey, look at T-55 right now
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SNECMA_Coléoptère
It's a ducted fan VTOL.
Not shown: the fact that this is not a simple spool-down. They've basically torn down all the old tooling.
T-64 -> T-80
T-55 -> T-62 -> T-72 -> T-90
@delicate beacon 340mm Mle.1912
French guns 
I need SEM-30 
25mm hotchkiss AA


me looking for french 57 mm AA shells
(can't find em)
@delicate beacon
Jonathan Ferguson pulls another obscure weapon out of our stores, focusing this week on a Colt AR-15 variant sent to the UK for testing by the British Army.
Britain was looking to re-equip its infantry squad with a full package of AR-type rifles, with this example with heavier barrell and bi-pod likely taking the place of the squad support wea...
Okay I am having trouble finding it on the internet, maybe bad question for the system to find what I want
What time was TORA TORA TORA broadcasted to all the Japanese ships and crew?
What time did the aircraft take off?
What time did the Japanese start the attack on pearl,
What time did Japan declare war on the USA.
I don't think they "declared" war 
They intentionally delaying and blame it on decoding the message
They did but it was like an hour or 2 after the attack began
Yeah but I recall that being a partial declaration or something, not actually one of war. 
Peace and war is complicated
I feel like I need to watch tora tora tora to get my times
The Imperial edict of declaration of war by the Empire of Japan on the United States and the British Empire (米國及英國ニ對スル宣戰ノ詔書) was published on December 8, 1941 (Japan time; December 7 in the United States), 7.5 hours after Japanese forces started an attack on the United States naval base at Pearl Harbor and attacks on British forces in Malaya, Singapore, and Hong Kong. The declaration of war was printed on the front page of all Japanese newspapers' evening editions on December 8. The document was subsequently printed again on the eighth day of each month throughout the war (until Japan surrendered in 1945), to re-affirm the resolve for the war.
wouldnt recommend movies for times

Ye they all have stuff wrong but at least tora tora tora seems to be the most accurate of the pearl movies
This today's dev blog?
still would recommend actual literature
or, you know, the official declaration of war signed by the japanese
Should have add this girl instead. Since we already have too many T-80s in this game so just end it with adding the best one
No thermals will indeed hurt it alot on night battles too
Risky trade for aps
i assume it's just gonna get dumped to 10.0
so it'll just be a blind meat wall if you miraculously dont get uptiered
that and it wont get the gud™️ round the T-80U does, like how they balanced the T-80UK
uhm
armed with a punchy AP round capable of penetrating over 500 mm armor at all firing distances
that means it gets
the same 536mm pen round of the russian T-80Us
not the Mango from the swedish t-80U
also the UK also gets the 536mm one 
they just dont get the 580mm one
Centauro for Soviet tree since Russia tested it once 
T-80BVM, T-72B3 and T-90A get 3BM60, 580mm pen
T-80U, T-80UK and this new one get 3BM46, 532mm pen
the Swedish T-80U gets 3BM42, Mango, 457mm pen
and the last one is also 10.7, btw
i dont see the new one being lower than 10.7
No, the T90 was buffed
only the 2 top of the line vehicles used to have 3BM60
now it's those 2 plus the t90A
the T-80Us still both have 3BM46, but at least they still reload faster than the T72s and 90
Wonder if they will add T-72B3M 2022 version later
T-62M Obr.2022 
Rear has era, roof has era, and backside also has era instead slat
Manlet also gets era
Could be nice upgrade
Oh yeah front tracks also gets Era like T-90M
not sure if i can post this but it's about the tank upgrade so
T-62MV obr.2022
Hmm what BR tho
Thermals are really good advantage. Do they worth 1.0 BR difference?
Or smh like 0.3?
gotcha, thank
i mean im too lazy to get it even as a t-80u wanker
the most accurate T-80 series tank in war thunder
lol
Wait
Like i know one of the very late Us had thermals, so for some reason they added them on the base one
I suppose the T-80U's thermal upgrade is just making it a T-80UK tho if its meant to be the baseline T-80U
it shouldn't have thermals
there's also the T-80UM
A U with thermals
which does have thermals
tho the T-80BV
no idea why the hell that has thermals
like seriously that thing doesn't get thermals until the 2017 T-80BVM
Like technically the first half of the Arietes didn't have CITV
The latter half did
So ingame it does
I think T-80B had it
I mean there's a chance I guess that at somepoint there's been a retrofit
tho only thing I can see that for is the T-80UM
wait a second
nothing for the T-80BV or T-80B
Maybe it's up to which T-80U is?
that's T-80UM
wait
"The T-80U(M) of the 1990s introduced the TO1-PO2 Agava gunner's thermal imaging sight and 9M119M Refleks-M guided missile, and later an improved 2A46M-4 version of the 125 mm gun and 1G46M gunner's sight was used."
Doesn't B3 also become B3M with module?
Fuck variants are confusing
it does
Was always fan of major refits instead small by small ones
so T-80U having thermals makes sense since the thermal upgrade just makes its a T-80UM
for the T-80B/BV
no fucking idea why that has thermals
In 1992, some T-80Us started receiving the Agava-2 thermal imager, though not in large amounts because industry delayed the supplies. The images produced by the divice are displayed on a TV-set type screen in the fighting compartment. The developers of the system were awarded the Kotin Prize for their system. In addition to that the new assembled tanks were equipped with R-163-50U radio sets. With all additions and upgrades the vehicle recieved the designation T-80UM.
T-80UWU
knowing how stuff works in the Soviet tree it makes sense
since the retrofits will make the tank to a entirely new variant
tho I still have no idea what upgrade for the T-80BV would give it thermals since it doesn't seem to get them until T-80BVM
and T-80BVMs is its own thing ingame
black eagle
Especially Black Eagle having West style autoloader 
8 rounds

apparently it carried 35-40 rounds
tho I'm assuming only a fraction of that
were in the autoloader
eh nothing's beating the M1 Thumpers autoloader I suppose
since the thing was actually able to replenish the ready rack

we could of had peak abraham lincoln
God
we must agree that the bob semple tank was the best of WWII
Not enough MGs
is that one of those sebastopol tanks
yes
eh same thing
and gremyashy
mm myes grembles
8km torps because fuck you lol
yeas
LOL
Dude Odessa was an absolute fucking mess
But at least we stole their sex number
Fuck now I want to print one for my Romanians models

Didn’t know they actually captured any of the damn things
im hoping i pull gremy in this round of uber gambling too
at least i think she's included i dont remember
horse
imma listen to "the red army is the strongest - rock remix"
while clapping in my oktober revolution
based
god i need to go look up what all i got last year in the gambling run
it was uh
lucrative
mysore, ise, hyuga, west virginia, enterprise, agincourt, abruzzi, leone, yukon, strasbourg, lazo, enough coal to get mp, aaaaaaand
azuma, alaska, smolensk and salem
lmfao
nah imma just park near the caps
Man we still don't have a fucking Impretritsa Mariya class
no she sucks
New York is nice
I rekt a NY in a viribus
She does pretty well
texas is better
I had like a 65 winrate
better turret angles
*38s
strongest NY user vs weakest oklahoma enjoyer
...fuck me i just realized i
You play okie for secondaries
yes
genuinely opened 69 boxes last year

A German bb main
took you long enough to figure that out

weakest BB's
Secondary baboon
took germany until the bayerns to realise 12" is cringe
“Hello yes I would like to run straight at the enemy for low passive damage that doesn’t pen most shit”
-the criminally insane
Okhotnik
least insane russian bote
Fake
Tallest loli 
?
Show picture of her irl

Otherwise she’s fake ship
Agincourt HE spam time
Deal. But you have to show me Montana's picture irl 
Montanas a fake ship

Wtf are you talking about
Fake= WG design
No
Or Else Iowa is fake in 1930s
I play Exeter a lot in T5 ranked
easy wins
Which ain't logical
I’m saying okh was not built
Kirov 
nice velocity tho still
Exeter is citadels on every cruiser
Broadside and sap?
Noob
Like genova is pretty bad but sometimes it's just lmao
Genova
God's easiest cit
20s reload moment
Dd with a cit
39 kts
She’s good, but I’d still take a dd
hah
just island hug
God, send me your best DD
God sends Emile Bertin
40 knot bote
https://utreon.com/c/forgottenweapons/
http://www.patreon.com/ForgottenWeapons
http://www.floatplane.com/channel/ForgottenWeapons
Cool Forgotten Weapons merch! http://shop.forgottenweapons.com
The MSBS Grot is Poland's current military service rifle, and has gone through several iterations in the many years of its development that led to its c...

Pluton / 2400t (Bison) class?
So they just old baguette guns
The 130 mle 1924 is from the Adroit class torpilleurs d’escadre
Yee
And the twin 13’s are those on le hardi
But we will likely get those on dunkek instead
So with a different mounting and turret

No twin 138.6 because otherwise we’d have 2 new french UR gears
What about 12cm No. 9 

It's very true, but going into great detail would take a very long writeup.


Kanonneerboot
Maar ze is nederlands
En wordt niet gebruikt in duitse tech trees
And has her design No. 9s instead of No. 8s

the child
120mm full auto
Neat
Anyone know why the Sovier prefer the P-47 over the P-51 from the American? A lot of people stated that when the US start to send the latter, the Russian were not impressive in the slightest but show much interest in the former

Wait so at tier 9 we have
Battleships with 12 15 inch guns
And 12 8 inch guns
So this is literally fat Buffalo
Because it’s 65

no she is a BB
Does anyone what is the naming covention with the USSR/ Russia for their ships?
BBs are named after Soviet states if Soyuz class, or some battles
DDs named after cities, Cruisers after famous people
What about sub? I think they were named after some kind of number
the p47 was extremely durable and had high firepower, the p51 is primarily a long range high altitude fighter, which is not where most fights took place there, they loved the p39 for the same reason
The P47 is big
big, tough, could carry way more bombs
Isn't it also have something to do with altitude where most air battle in the Eastern Front took place close to the ground?
yes, though I did state that
Yeah, I just noticed that
the p47 does have good high altitude performance, just not as good as the p51, but it's also just tougher, has more weapons and a much higher bomb load
the p51 could escort bombers at heights enemy fighters couldn't compete while still heavily armed, but the p47 was just a flexible flying brick
I personally like the p39 and p47 better myself as well
the p51 is not particularly durable, breaking the mold some
First and foremost- they did not like the P-47 very much either!
While both aircraft are capable fighter-bombers, it's actually this quality that made them less palatable to the VVS, as it had no need for fighter-bombers when IL-2s (and later the IL-10) made up the brunt of the air to ground force, so their qualities as fighters mattered more
And in this regard, many pilots did not like the Jug (pardon typos, raw text from a forum thread):
"I have heard that some were used as inteceptors over Moscow-
A total of 203 were said to have been delivered to the USSR.
They were "ferried to Abaden, Iran, where they were turned over to Soviet pilots"
"Other online sources state that 195 "D" models went to Russia, who (the Russians) apparently did not like them that much."
"The Red Army Air Force gets 196 Thunderbolts P-47D-22-RE & P-47D-27-RE. The Russian pilots did not like it. They said that under 6.000 meters Thunderbolt was more like a flying heavy target rather than a fighter. It was probably intended to be a high altitude escort fighter but Russians did not have many heavy bombers to escort. So most Thunderbolts did not reach the front and served in the air defense units in Roumania, Hungary and 50 of them in the North fleet. In such way P-47 was not used in combat by Soviets."```
and a relevant snippet from a much longer continuation, if you wish to read it all (and more), you will find it here:
https://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?t=160342
Posted Fri February 27 2004 10:58
Translated from airwar.ru. I`m not the best translator in the world, but this will give you an idea.
"Year 1944 and 1945. The press-service of firm Republic very much frequently published a symbolical picture of four fighters Ð-47 "Thunderbolt" in colors of the Air Forces of USA, the Great Britain, Brazil and Soviet Union. But " group portrait " does not suffice only "Thunderbolt" with a cocarde of the French Air Forces. Within the second world war fighters Ð-47 consist in arcenal of the Air Forces of five states.
By quantity(amount) received "Thunderbolt" Soviet Union takes the fourth place. William Green in the fundamental work " Warplanes of the Second World War " speaks about 203 sent of USA in USSR "Thunderbolt" of variants P-47D-22-RE and P-47D-27-RE, 196 planes, according to Green, has reached the addressee. The information from archive of the general Staff of the Air Forces of the Soviet Army differs not strongly - 190 fighters Ð-47 is received in 1944 and five - in 1945. Probably, in the Soviet archive one more is not taken into account(discounted) plane - P-47D-10-RE factory number 42-75202 bought on collected American senators of means, this plane has received an own name " Knight of Pythias ". It(him) tested in middle of 1944 in scientific research institute of the Air Forces and ËÈÈ.
"Thunderbolt" has disappointed soviet pilots - verifiers. One of best engineers - test pilots Mark Lazarevich Gallaj said about flight on Ð-47:
" First minutes of flight I knew this is not a fighter! Steady, with comfortable spacious cockpit, convenient, but - not a fighter. "Thunderbolt" had not acceptable maneuverability in horizontal and it is especial in vertical . The plane slowly was dispersed - inertia of heavy aircraft had an effect. But "Thunderbolt" is wonderful for simple flight on a route without sharp maneuvers. It is not enough for a fighter ."
Not really different opinion about "Thunderbolt" from pilots had Soviet aviation ingineers. Not looking at the licked forms of a fuselage and apparent perfection of aerodynamics, factor CX at "Thunderbolt" appeared less than at main German fighters Bf. 109G and Fw-190A. Interest has caused not the plane, but turbocharger , the engine, the aviation equipment. The plane have disassembled "by bones" and have carefully studied in the Bureau of new engineering comission (ÁÍÒ ÍÊÀÏ). Experts ÁÍÒ have let out in Russian the full description on fighter Ð-47. Engineers have made conclusions also concerning quality and methods of manufacturing of units and units that flew American fighter, having noted, that on a technological level Soviet aviation industry lags behind from American.
Front pilots of Air Force have not estimated highly a transatlantic miracle. The escort of heavy bombers in 1944 at Soviet Union was not the slightest need - all weight of war was born(carried) on itself with front aircraft. Air fights on the soviet-German front were conducted at heights below 6000 m, just at those heights where "TBOLT" more all resembled a flying target. On small heights Ð-47 lost on all aspects to any Soviet or german fighter of a sample of 1944. The interesting fact - it is possible, that americans tried to improve manuevering qualities of "Soviet" "Thunderbolt", delivering them with already removed(taken off) external machine guns. Actually "Thunderbolt" repeated a history of soviet fighter MIG- 3 - outstanding at high alt and clumsy at the ground. This type of plane in Air Force during the war appeared dead.```
TL;DR: The P-47, like the previous MiG-3, was considered far too brick-ish at lower altitudes (where air combat mostly took place on the Eastern Front, often below 6000m) and being a fighter-bomber could not make up for it either as they did not want, nor need one (so it often served as long-range patrols in less important places)

i never read super far into this properly but this does match the impressive i'd gotten so far
As for the Mustang, it should be noted that they first received the Mustang Mk. I (or P-51A basically), which was before the P-51s got Merlin engines (which also did not help much as there was an emphasis on higher altitude performance with the Merlin), and were not satisfied with it
Despite the fact that the Mk.I did not impress Soviet pilots and engineers during state tests, three Mustangs were sent to the 3rd Air Army on the Kalinin Front for combat trials in the fall of 1942. Two aircraft were flown by the 5th Guards Fighter Regiment, which at the time was equipped with LaGG-3s. Among those who flew the Mustangs was Hero of the Soviet Union V.A. Zaytsev (34 aerial victories) and future Hero of the Soviet Union V.I. Popkov (41 victories). In his memoirs, Popkov gave the Mustangs a negative review. According to him, although the aircraft’s speed was sufficient, “it was heavy, like iron”. The Soviet ace also noted that the Mk.I’s maneuverability left much to be desired, and its rate of climb was poor compared to other fighters available at the time. Another five Mustangs were sent to the 6th Reserve Brigade near Ivanovo where they were used to help convert Soviet pilots to US-built aircraft, and the other two found their way to the Air Force Academy and the Central AeroHydrodynamic Institute. Although the Luftwaffe claimed that two Soviet P-51s were shot down over Karelia in late 1943, the VVS never used its Mustangs in combat, and the German pilots more than likely misidentified the aircraft that were shot down.```
From https://vvsairwar.com/2017/08/07/the-soviet-unions-us-built-mustang-mk-i-fighters/
Pretz 
bit of a shame tho, thunderbolts and sturmoviks flying together would be based
They would also receive the P-51B later, but likewise were not pleased with it's low altitude performance either
Here's the performance test in refence to the Mustang Mk. I though, comparing it to then-contemporary Fighter options in the Yak-7B and later production Yak-1s (i.e. Yak-1B) as well as the Bf 109 F/G
(Summary translation via the first forum link again)
Test results:
Date: June 1942
Engine: Allison V-1710-39
Take-off power: 1150 hp
Take-off weight: nornal 3880 kg
Wing area, squre meters: 21,98
Maximal velocity: at zero altitude - 459 km/h (483 km/h with boost), 557 km/h at 4400 meters (587 km/h with boost at 4600 meters)
Climb time to 5 km: 10,5 minutes (9,0 with boost)
Bank time at 1 km: 23 sec
Practical maximal alititude: 8 400 meters
Maximal range: 1 620 km in nornmal variant
Armament: 4 7,62 MGs, 4 12,7 MGs
The text says that after the trials which ended in July 1942 Soviet specialists noted that in such essential characteristics as maximal speed (in nominal regime), and especially climb speed and maneuvrability P-51 was inferior to Soviet and new German fighters. In particlular P-51 climbed to 5-km alititide in 9 minutes (using boost), while Yak-7B with M-105PF engine did it in 5,8-6,0 minutes and Bf-109F - in 4,8-5,4 minutes. In a combat turn (no idea what is the correct translation, it's a turn with simultaneous climb) P-51 climbed to 550 meters, two times less than Yak-1, Yak-7B and Bf-109-F/G. However, it's mentioned that perfomance of the new model P-51A with a more powerful engine was better, but it was still not a match for modern German fighters. I't's also siad that Soviet Air Forces didn't realy need fighter-bomber airplanes,and that partly explains the their lack of interest in P-51```
Additionally, for more logistical reasons, there was also the problem that most Soviet (and German) aero-engines ran on 87 grade octane, whereas US and British engines typically used 96-100 grade octane, so the heavier fighters may suffer from degraded performance in Soviet service
P-39's Allison really only worked out because they tuned it to have more power at the cost of engine lifespan (does it really matter how long that engine's gonna last if a performance difference means the plane gets shot down before you can even start reaching the peak hours?) in addition to removing a decent amount of equipment to lighten the plane, like part of the armor and (frankly useless) wing-mounted rifle caliber guns
Scheme g?
and no bofors lol

new to the party?
































