#history
1 messages · Page 38 of 1
I wanna see those Chinese horses with anti radiation gear
The great horde cares not for atomic weaponry
To be fair, it was a little more than that. Churchill want to governed Britian like he used to it in the war and nobody like that. To make it worse, he make a smear campaign that compared to the Larbor to the Gestapo which really ticked the majority of the British citizens at that time. Again, while Churchill was focus on the war, it was Clement Attlee who feed and take care of the people.
Oh certainly, was not saying that was the sole reason
Just an amusing anecdote
I certainly have my share of issues with Churchill as a wartime leader
He is a little complicated in the end
🥬
also regarding why they don't just continue firebombing Japan, aside from what Jaba said I believe there was a degree of uncertainty regarding how long it would take until Japan actually gives out from blockades or bombings, and post-war materials reveals that Japan could have survived well into 1946 and possibly more with what stocks they have. Prolonging the war to potentially another year isn't something anyone was willing to entertain by that point, especially since you still have to put large amounts of men and material to ensure nothing slip past the blockade and giving more time for Japan
this is assuming they would rather try starving them out rather than doing the all-out assault that was Downfall
Every month the war went on cost the lives of at least 200,000 Asians, according to UN estimates
So if the nuclear bombs shorten the war by even a month (let alone the expected year+ a ground campaign or blockade would take) it’s already a net savings in lives
Does that only count the soldiers or any citizens that the Japanese want to have some 'fun times' with?
Civilians too
Even the Soviet entry into the war probably killed more people than the nukes—Japanese and US historians find that probably at least 300,000 of the captured never returned
(mostly because years in Siberian POW camps is not good for health)
Once you go into the Gulag, you probably never return
I believe the wartime average is that 1/3 of Axis POWs never returned from Soviet captivity, compared to about 2/3 of Soviet POWs in German camps, 1% of Western POWs in German camps, and a bit less than 1% German POWs in Western Allied camps
Interestingly, when we start counting the POW number on the Eastern Front, the number can be very skewed due to German methodology in counting and their policy which often have a mixture of practicalism and 'exterminate the sub-human'.
Yeah, the POW numbers don't include the German habit of shooting surrendering Red Army soldiers instead of taking them prisoner
(But it does add to their "kill ratios")
At one point, Glantz did stated in his Operation Barborassa book that a lot of time, the German lumped both POW and soldier who still fighting at one so when you looked up to 4 mil casualities in the first 2 years of the Eastern Front, you could see that it is most likely 60 to 70% of these 'casualities' are probably POW and the German just shoot to hell and back or being put in working camp where they would be forced to to work till death.
A similar problem was seen with US back in Vietnam too
As Tato said. Soviet fleet was under their own construction plan to have a much larger navy. We are speaking of more than 300 ships under construction here. That's why Invasion really ruined it all
Those steels would probably be more productive for new T-34 and KV-1 tanks, not to included rebuilt the air force which basically gone back to almost zero.
%100 for sure yes. But that logical choice is the reason why people mock Soviets not having ships. Soviets did the right choice for them still. But well it wouldn't hurt to have more cruisers and destroyers tho. Since Leningrad and Sevastopol siege was focused on naval artillery too
And using destroyers more for escorting like Gremyashchy 
No one mocks the Soviets for not having ships
Everyone knows the ussr was primarily a land focused power in ww2
Hence why resources were diverted
People mock NP for getting 3 events and a UR before French and England
Despite having a minor navy
yeah, it's more overrepresentation
It’s the same reason why Germany is shat on
Leningrad could certainly use some more ships. Espeically with the Siege which is as brutal as Stalingrad itself or even more
it's also linked to jokes around WoWS

Everyone knows the German navy was small, that it was second fiddle to the army, and that many of its ambitious plans are cut short by war
People hate the fact they get 5 events and a trillion rainbows
Oh yeah Leningrad had large starvation problem.
The Kriegsmarine is small?

Compared to its rivals yes
Tiny
yup
because WoWS did a """naval legends""" video about Soyuz, which never was built, and compared it favorably to the likes of Montana and Yamato, and a submarine, which is """famous""" for missing its shot
According to Phoenix's data. It was just 60k tons more than Soviet navy
like the soviets it's highly overblown
And some random fuckoff “carrier killer” missile boat that did nothing pass its trials
"our famous submarine which claimed to have torpedoed Tirpitz"
The Kriegsmarine lost 50% of its operational DD fleet in 1940 in one fjord
"it missed"
For info on how she would’ve done I refer you to another carrier killer called - (dragged off stage)
Didn't they make a shit ton of submarines to fuck with the British convoy?
Never sank more than one percent of shipping
So
Yay
Also 25% death rate
Yeah, a bit over a thousand U-boats. But other navies made thousands of small boats and patrol craft
Yeah but subs arent surface ships
Highest death rate of the war
70%
Damn, fucking Sabaton give me an image of super German submarine
survival rate

they did pressure the british a lot early, but nothing like the ww1 capabilities of the overall german navy
much like in ww1, the us kinda came in and uboats became coffins
U-boats dropped like flies the moment the CVE hunter killer groups started roaming the Atlantic
there are cvls with a dozen uboat kills under their belts
Fun fact, Outbound North 92 (second from top) got a Sabaton song about it
The long route back, Convoy 92
Bury, Gleaves and Ingham leading
Tankers to the west
And upon the North Atlantic
Lies the silence of the sea
And on the quietest night in the darkest hour
The Kriegsmarine appear```
The Sabaton song “Wolfpack” is about that convoy
You might remember these lines:
Bury stands in flames
Half the convoy sunk or disabled
Heading back to shore```
Convoy ON 92 was a trade convoy of merchant ships during the Second World War. It was the 92nd of the numbered series of ON convoys Outbound from the British Isles to North America. The ships departed from Liverpool on 6 May 1942 and were joined on 7 May by Mid-Ocean Escort Force Group A-3.
The convoy was discovered by Wolfpack Hecht on 11 May; ...
Yeah, really make me think German submarine being badass and shit
I would not recommend sabaton for serious historical analysis
Literarature is better
Creative math there
it was also a westbound convoy
so "heading back to shore" in this context was

arriving at their destination

Interesting
If you want to read more about the U-boat war, there's an old conversation up here about the myths
Sabaton is biased for German stuff which makes the Wehrbs believe their lyrics as well.
Like "She was made to rule the 7 seas" gives you impression that Germans designed Bismarck to be strongest BB ever. While that's not really true especially with arrival of H designs
I guess German submarines was much cooler back in WW1
Eh
german fleet in general was much stronger in ww1
eh
with more peer to peer equal designs too
even at their highest success rate, the u-boats never really got close to actually starving out Britain. There were over a thousand US boats yes, but many of them were made past the fleet's fun times. As far as I know Donitz himself knew he was nowhere close to having enough subs to do it in 1940, and by the time he think he does, the Allies already put effective countermeasures
I think it was more about hyping through the song than really biased. You should have heard the Winged Hussar or Seven Pillar of Wisdom.
Their WW1 album are pretty sick though
The WWI u-boats actually stood a chance of bringing Britain's merchant fleet to its knees, as Jellicoe himself confided in 1917. The switch to the convoy system later that year drastically cut losses, but U-boats were never truly "defeated" in WWI the way they were in 1943
🔨
sad my images from then are gone, some have a ton of reactions and were probably funny
Howard please no dinosaurs 
They didn’t have enough hms dreadnought to ram them all
submarines were a pretty recent development in WWI, and much like tanks and other new developments nobody were quite sure how to to deal with them initially, though unlike many land developments anti-sub countermeasures were fairly slower to come
As an example of the importance of the convoy system, in WWII, a majority of ships lost were lost out of convoy, despite the vast majority of Atlantic voyages being in convoy
Back when using ships with big guns are considered meta.
Now everyone just throw planes out like freaking shuriken.

I don't know, it seems CV are still king of the navy
If missiles weren’t invented BBs could’ve stuck around a method to bring a lot of boom to one place
Missiles kind of took that
CVs stole the flagship role mid war
CVs never roam around alone tho. They also need missile defense shield
But BBs still had a job latewar and postwar
bbs were king of the night even late war
Oh yeah, the Iowa-class was actived back during US invasion on the Middle East
uh
A single hit will fuck all your systems
Qwerty
also there are some overrepresentations on convoys that did fail, eg PQ-17
you are aware that the RN attempted a design study against the kind of guided AP bombs emerging, right?
and they basically concluded
"lol no"
Does ships even have considerable level of armor? Didn't All or nothing method became the main stay for all ships since WW2?
I was talking from a mission kill perspective
Didn't early anti ship missiles had more penetration than modern ones?
so to some people it may look like the system isn't effective, even when the reason it fails was that because it splitted over faulty intel
lolno
A missile can pretty easily damage all your electronics
so can a bomb
How. Armor was still valued I think 
and planes can fly a lot farther than shells
Missiles still had more to do with the death of BBs than planes
not really, no
all or nothing was adopted by navies outside the us immediately post ww1, though modern ships have little protective armor in the same way those did
it was more the combination of planes carrying missiles imo
planes themselves got weaponry that's not very... applicable to anti air
as it was simply too far away to be realistic
Nah I'm with Qwerty on this one
Khrushchev also believed missiles were the end of artillery and battleships
In Azur Lane, why are Kaga and Akagi sister? Aren't they different class of ship?
Nowadays ships are not heavily armored, no. But splinter protection (e.g. Kevlar) over certain vitals like magazines is still common, and flight decks that can handle jet aircraft have to be thick enough that they already provide a bit of HE bomb resistance. But the old concept of armor as a way to reject projectiles and prevent damage is mostly dead due to the increased lethality and accuracy of modern weapons, and now active defenses (hard and soft kill) are the primary defense, with "armor" just being used to reduce the odds of the worst damage
Kaga used parts of cancelled Amagi
Smh like that
So it's less about survived a hit but more about prevent from getting hit in the first place? Gotcha
artillery after a certain distance is simply too small an angle to hit a target reliably, or too far away to hit in any real time, in pinches
bofors were already quite good at killing planes and things like the 3''/50 rf make bofors look terrible, and could hit planes at much further range
then the planes gained range, they didn't have to come in to bomb or torpedo, they simply had missiles themselves for that scenario, and then it's aa vs a missile swarm from planes that can circle you outside standoff range
so you need missiles yourself, but then what type of ship is best for that
Surviving hits still matters, but often more in "soft" factors like improved firefighting systems rather than armor specifically. Not getting hit is of greater importance in relative terms, though, yes
so they become siblings because Kaga have parts of Amagi on her body?

This is some Space Marine shit here
Manjuu's wish
because early AShMs aren't running around with options for 5-7x charge diameter warheads which open a hole to deliver a totally intact warhead through?

actually here's a little thing I've been pondering, so realistically speaking, what would be the procedure to engage something as big as a kaiju in modern ground combat? Let's leave aside the matter if the attacks damages it or not, just want to know how it would be done according to current practices
Modern warfare in a nutshell
Shoot it with increasingly larger projectiles until it dies
I don't think there is any "meat" that stop AP weapons
I guess a analog for this is me having a heart surgery and the family of the person who sacrificed his heart to me suddenly become my family too
I don’t think soldiers like in the movies will continue to pump 5.56 at the walking mountain if it doesn’t do anything in the first ten seconds

for starters, practically anything thrown at it will be from a range it can neither see or comprehend in the case of missiles or artillery
And also probably a lot more jeeps with bazookas
none of the japanese movie 'the helicopter flies up to its face to shoot it' nonsense
Anti-Bunker bombs with planes should do the trick?
like, 15" diameter BROACH warhead is looking at 1000-2000mm RHAe penetration at the lowest end of possibility
You probably just fire a tomahawk at it
If that doesn’t work drop a nuke before it gets to a city
they even use those to kill godzilla in one movie iirc
Calm down McArthur
they did it in Shin
Mass using jeeps with Bazookas in war is basically UNSC tactics from Halo
and it did damage Godzilla
What Godzilla re we talking about here?
problem is Godzilla responded by point defense lasers with ranges of several dozen kilometers
but yeah that's the first thing you'd notice is it'd probably be mostly artillery, and missile spamming platforms for a target that large, there's no need to get close to it
Most animals
The lizard American one or the one that said 'ouch that hurt' to a 50 megaton bomb?
Godzilla's plot skin armor
figures that'll be the case, but its fun to to ask it anyway
Or the one that 300 meters tall and shoot down a giant ass meteore with laser breath?
oops sorry, was supposed to respond to Maka

Historically speaking Akagi is part of the Amagi class Battlecruisers.
the two were meant for carrier conversions due to WNT, but Amagi was damaged by 1923 Kanto earthquake beyond repair, so Kaga from the "adjacent" Kaga/Tosa-class BB was chosen as a replacement.
They're often referred to as "half-sisters" especially since the Amagi and Kaga class designs were somewhat related
I see, so their definition of 'sister' is more on the role rather than the structure, like adopted vs blood sisters
like I doubt there would be any people on foot, or even tanks, they'd probably try a few potshots with something like an a-10 in visual range before confirming it needs more firepower
Adopted yes
which is why most kaijus were given physics breaking regen rate; one version of big G was being explained as all the missiles and bullets does damaged him, they just grew back all the damages in nanoseconds
I dunno. ~120mm AMP/MPHE and other penetrating HE rounds vs flesh would be pretty amusing.
sorta. also they were experimented a lot during the interwar period.
A-10 is basically the prime example of America having way too much money for its military. That thing should have been phased out 40 years ago but the only reason it doesn't because any enemies US fought against was basically goat herders with AK and nothing more
British: Oi use HEAT 
That is why AC-130 work in the first place too
why would the British use HEAT
realistically probably even a few a-10s would absolutely rend an animal of even that size, but it's an example opener before moving on
it's airborn and can retreat from the super plodding building monster
🅱️ESH
tbf realistically they would just
collapse
from physics
the moment they set foot onto land

I mean even if they somehow had the biology to do it
people forget that jurassic park could've been avoided with a single bmg
something something snk titant biology
Godzilla tips over and dies from falling over, and the town feasts on its meat for months
I would still said that it depends on what Gojira are we talking about here. The 50s to 60s Godzilla could be put down but anything from that on is a little difficult to determine
would a kaiju even have the metabolism to be able to move without the support of buoyancy in water
Heck, Earth Godzilla even have a bio-shield that protect it from projectile and it can released supersonic soundwave that strong enough to flatten trees make of steel
Remember, bipedalism is restricted to a few meters in height because beyond that you die if you trip and fall 
nuclear radiation solves everything
Oh yeah, the same Godzilla who punch a hole onto the middle in Earth to fight giant MONKE
the problem with monsters anymore is we are too strong for monsters that even remotely make sense
Can Nimitz's deck even handle Godzilla tho lol. Should he just collapse to bottom again
that would require such a short half life from the relevant isotopes that the creature wouldn't live long enough to grow to such a size
ergo nuclear radiation explains how something smaller than modern buildings can level the entire Himalayan range with 1 shot
Yeah, I noticed. Japan seems to have the tendency to create individual carriers or class of carriers that only have 2 or 3 ships at most compared to America who have like 24 Essex-class ships alone
Remember when dragons were the most strongest of Middle age 
9mm fodder
.22 bait
which is why kaijus these days grow more eldritch in nature
Not a suprise there, if you watch the movie, in later part, Kong can jump on top of buildings without collapsing it so the physics is kinda wonky there
heck, Godzilla turned from just a normal mutated lizard to either a super organism or a billion years old meteor tanking god
also apparently the nuke they used in KOTM was 1 gigaton in strength
Aliens are our new enemy since their super tech makes them more scary foe than big monsters
yeah, of course I just wish it was more realistic, but it's hard to have a hero monster instead of like a bunch of super monsters and have it be combat realistic
Pacific Rim
even pacific rim is very unrealistic

none of the monsters there are worth more than one or two missiles
But robot vs Kaiju is pretty sick though so I give it a pass
admittedly the allure of giant monsters are ALWAYS that they don't make sense and we just watch them to see military pew pews
If you want realism in your entertainment just go watch yukikaze
pacific rim is very much what the transformers movies wish they were
Kinda misleading because those are wartime production, and as Normal Friedman says, the ironclad law of mobilization is that you produce the design you have. US carrier classes prewar were in ones and twos (even Hornet was a one-off extra order to bridge the gap until Essex); had the war not started you might only see a handful of Essexes before a new class was designed and built. Hence why instead of a bunch of medium size DD class batches, you get 175 Fletchers, and why you got so many Clevelands rather than many smaller classes with minor upgrades
Normal Friedman?
Yeah, also known as Orthogonal Libertymale
Does anyone know why Sovetskaya Belorussiya is not on the PR ship list? It seems she got scrapped before her hull even completed.

Because she doesn't have WG modification
WG designs or design modifications becomes PR
While laid down or planned ships, likes Brunhild, Belo, Heinrich etc
Are offical designs of their nations without WG touching them
So normal construction
I'm personally of a huge fan of the other direction of monster movies, the hfy kind where the enemy just gets roflstomped
The Japanese themselves planned for 16 Unryū class carriers, though in reality they never had the industry to achieve half that
but then we won't be the underdogs 
people loves underdogs
power trips are just as fun
You guys could try Shin Ultraman, quite a fresh take on Kaiju style movie
and even more, people loves military hardwares being annihilated
Why Japan attacked without finishing important stuff? Like waiting for 5 Yamato to be finished instead going at early
too many underdog stories is boring and depressing, and you get tired of the plot armor
ah yeah, you'll love Shin Ultraman then Maka
6 months of oil
I have been recommended it before, but know little of it
So if they had oil, they would wait like 5 year more?
Just have the chance to watch a week ago. Japan military kinda doing pretty well until Mefilas decided to ramp up his Kaiju power and forced Lipiah to intervene.
nah that's where I boo in the theater
And modern military being helpless against Ultraman and Mefilas actually make more sense, in some way
Avatar movie 
Maybe, or not go to war with the US at all. But it's tricky, since the US also was the main supplier of steel to Japan, and ships do need steel
yeah, fricken BOOOOO
nonsense
Is that why they need to get China?
Fleet will be useless after 6 months since no oil
China started in 1931 and picked up in 1937
1940 France goes down, and shortly thereafter Japan occupies French Indochina
Interesting, I though Japan attack European colonies in SEA are mostly to buy more time for new ships to be construct or something like that
That causes the US to impose the asset freeze and oil embargo, which starts the ticking clock
Paradox 
The navy has 6 months of oil, the army maybe 1-2 years of oil
So why they attack China in the first place? I doubt it is for 'living space' like the German on USSR.
it is about that, funnily enough

Aint also Resources ?
Well, they haven't go on full exterminating scale on Korea yet so I don't think they are fully committed on that idea, maybe not yet.
The 1931 Manchurian invasion was actually started by Japanese mid-level officers, not the leaders at the top. They staged a false flag railroad bombing (with a pathetically small amount of damage to the tracks) and used that to launch an invasion, and achieved such success that the Japanese public or military would have assassinated any Prime Minister who tried to pull out and end the war
kremlin bringing up repressed memories of me renting that like 15 years ago and as soon as it gets to the combat scenes where they're fighting like space age era weapons and aircraft etc with their bare hands and winning with the power of friendship I was like mannn this is such bs
And I do mean assassinated—Japan by the 30s was government by assassination
the right wing elements of Japan had been propagandizing China as the wild west of Japan in the 30s, they saw how the US gradually pushed more and more west to Indian lands and saw parallels for Japan to do it in China, and there were initial plans to colonize Chinese lands with Japanese colonists. Which didn't pan out because a large chunks of the places they did own were dirt poor grasslands
Here's my recommended videos about the Japanese decision to go to war
The first link in particular is probably the one you want
Did Japan leaderships even account for the chance that they would bog down halfway through? The coast is easy games but when we start to get inland, the difficult go from 1 to 100 real fast there.
They didn't think there would be a full scale industrial war in China
The 1937 Battle of Shanghai escalated into a full scale war instead of police actions and punitive raids like they expected, since they were facing a United (ish) China for the first time
It became full scale war the moment Japan start to treat the Chinese the same way they treated a pig. I'm suprised no one in the war cabinets have realized that yet.
They had kinda gotten away with a "colonial war" mentality in mainland Asia for a long while
true
BTW, is it just me here because I feel like several ships in AL are not even related to history but rather some kind of bizarre crossover with World of Warship?


Not just you
it is a crossover
the pr system is entirely a crossover
I knew it
There is a pinned post by Silver that is a description of which ships are fake
Here
(wows has azur lane skins and commaners in return)
Although some of PR ships may have some historical relation, like Saint Louis
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint-Louis-class_cruiser
The French Navy (Marine Nationale) created a series of heavy cruiser designs in 1939 to follow the Algérie but free of the limitations imposed on warship construction by the London Naval Treaty and Washington Naval Treaty. This series was designated C5. At the outbreak of Second World War, all ships under construction that could not be finished ...
Check Silver's doc
cool
It goes over how historical and how paper each one is
will do
by 1940 the entire war cabinet were in sunk cost mode, as their own propaganda which generated popular war support more or less killed any notion of pulling out from the war without massive public face loss, eg operational consideration(we NEED to win the China War) outweighing strategical consideration (We actually don't need to get into war in the first place)
anchorage is also a monster
the city?
the ship
oh
would be funnier if Anchorage is really a living abomination ngl
anchorage has extremely heavy armament and ridiculous armor protection for the ship type
Anchorage was pretty pleasant when I visited
in wows terms anchorage would be easily one of the stronger tier 10s
the fact she's not is hilarious tweaking and fudgy game mechanics
but anchorage still classic using chicago piano than quad bofor
wows makes up what damage aa guns do anyway (and if actually built she'd be refit regardless)
@spring briar
Question
Can we find even better materials to use for armor in space. Or does the solar system knowledge already gave us idea on all materials in space?
deflector shields
Huh
I know this guy named Worf that has access to some real good deflector shields
It would be quite interesting if we have a crossover with Halo or WH40K
Imagine those Kansen would look like
love me some halo
also speaking of Alaska
boom
polar dinosaurs my beloved
It's so weird that their ship design is putting the MAC gun at the front, basically making the ship a flying cannon
but yeah for reference anchorage has
around 8 inch belt, 3 inch deck, 9 inch turret faces, even something like zao would get crumpled
the entire ship has the gun run through it, ala barbette
for the largest gun possible to destroy covenant shields and ships
Yeah, but it usually for ground-based MAC gun, most MAC gun for ships are struggle to fight against the Covenent till the Infinity
they probably didn't anticipate getting so outclassed in space
the unsc obviously has a huge investment in troopers and the logic would be to support them with huge mac rounds on enemy installations in time of war, while fighting above
just unfortunately they had trouble not getting shot up and destroyed or forced to retreat
I remember eps 3 on planet dinosaur showed arctic life in cretaceous period
and it was based
Iridium will be interesting
The entire war basically boil down to holding long enough for the Prophet of Truth to have some genious idea in betraying the Elite in the middle of a freaking war
The ground force did better though becasue Covenant don't considered war as numbers but as art.
unsc had a ton of investment in ground forces, their weak link was certainly their spacefighting capability
they could definetly swing with the covenant on the ground
and it was glorious
just when the covenant will... glass your planet, and your ships lose to theirs
yeah
the weakness in unsc doctrine got exploited all the way to earth
lately we're seeing increasing evidence of dinosaurs being able to survive in polar conditions with the necessary adaptions to do so
The SPARTAN are basically the main way to deal with Covenant in space till admiral Cole think of something new. But then the UNSC make a mistake and put too many SPARTAN together in one operation that one time and this end up with them being butchered to hell and back
Still, Halo and 40k ships design are very interesting because it bring back projectile weapons rather than utilize missiles almost purely like 21st century ships
Well, it helps there is no horizon in space
projectile weapons do have a place I feel, I very much like the clash and doctrines that use certain weapon types
hell, we've found antarctic dinosaurs, some of whom were fairly large
High velocity kinetic weapons definitely will have a place
spartan armor was extremely resistant to energy weapons, it's why even elites are no match for them
Punching holes in the pressurised hulls
the Elvis lizard
reject projectiles and missiles, embrace phaser banks
I mean the MJOLNIR Mark V to Mark VII basically incorperated Covenant personal energy shield after all
yeah, they went and stole the tech and incorporated it for an even further boost
it's why if I had to really choose between a ground force I'd pick unsc
dirty Romulan smh

and the (sadly kinda dubious) Antarctosaurus
in some verses I do, in others I stay with projectiles
stellaris I had a hard time debating over if my other oc's race in space tech age would stick with battleship projectiles, or be on phasers
as they are playing with energy weapons already in their 1920s ish equivalent
Phaser bank, isn't that Star Trek and Star Wars stuff?
Trek stuff yea
Federation warship my beloved
I'm personally prefer the 40k and Halo projectile style more
combination between super heavy and ultra fast projectile guns with laser batteries
ds9 not being remastered in hd yet is tragic
1 nuke in the middle of this
what being developed using technologies that doesn't leaves behind negatives does to a mf
a nuke would barely shake navigation shields
^
Not the shockwave
proper Trek shields shrug off shots that melt continents
The X-rays
Would Azur Lane incorperated more on ships from WW1 and before that or their 'limit with WW2 ships' policy still being the main priority here?
they're defo gravitating towards WW1 more
yeah cosmic ray filtering is standard even on the spaced armor hull platings
How tf does communication work if almost all light spectrums are blocked by the shield
Space pigeon?
I noticed that, I think they mentioned the High Sea Fleet being involved after Operation Siren storyline

use weird bands for it that are modulated in ways you know
in fairness when you have one species being able to survive the full force of the big bang, punt a ship halfway across the galaxy, and manipulate the fabric of reality as they please, anti-nuke shield is the least of your problem 
star trek is an extremely weird hill to die on for 'tech that doesn't make sense' regardless
Eh
Not really
If you’re willing to fight that battle atleast
Since star trek atleast does a good job in basing things on science
Or pseudo science
the only science in trek is the science of Ferengi economics and how it is better for our society
that's why I said it's a really weird hill
🌭
🌭

Maka your emote looks like Ares here


I tend to wonder if these are just doodle or from an actual historical manual.
cause if they are, then Germans clearly has a particular sense of humor.
someone doodled these, regrettably
rip
not actual designs, which I would have liked
I mean
I studied Liechtenauer, Ringeck, and Talhoffer (with a bit of Fiore) and for the life of me, I find this rather... genius
@delicate beacon

Do you realise how often I have found that imagine due to the lack of online presence of anything related to staag?
Why are Sweden and Sitzerland in here
This wasn’t wrong tho

Can confirm, Britain was evul 
was?
leurope
L'hotdog
Bro whoever designed this is fucking lit
It's like Soviet YF-23
which has already flown
That would be If a 3rd gen and a 5th gen fighter jet had a son
i feel like top left should also apply to britiain in some ways
The death chonks
we stan death chonks
Time to surpass Metal Gear.
outh dakota-c
What is the Outh Dakota-C anyways?
just like in Zanzibar
vampire

By the time STAAG shows up, the quad Bofors is radar directed as well
It just uses an off mount director
So the person aiming the system and the radar itself aren't being buffeted and shaken by the recoil and muzzle blast
Which was the primary failing of the STAAG and Hazemeyer mounts
And remains the most common failing of gun system with on-mount radars
Hazemeijer started with an off mount directer but on-mount FC became more important for small ships
This predated Radar and even when radar was a thing there was a push for self-contained mounts in case of power loss
On mount direction really isn't worth the trouble
Darling harbour
Need to head over East again and climb aboard her
Lost all my photos from last time I was in Sydney
At least I have HMAS Ovens to entertain me
have you visited any CVs before?
Buddy, Vampire, Oberon and Diamantina are the only botes I got on
Endeavour and James Craig as well, I guess 
if you ever find yourself stateside, the bigger ships are definitely worth checking out
it took me the better half of an hour just to explore the hangar of hornet
and then there were so many layers jfc
there's also that warship smell which you find on every warship you go to
yup
found it on intrepid, hornet, midway
like someone just re-finished the floors
no kind of like
rust
and something else i can't put my finger on
i bet if i went on massa i would've got it
Not travelling anytime for the forseeable future 
i was actually undecided on who to oath, then i was driving by massa and decided "fuck it lmao"
nice paint job
Going for the fake model to match the fake ship are you
Get dabbed on
(Yes I know it’s not the same)
absolute chad
I have in mind to scrap the whole model and do it again, actually
as in to design or shell acc?
oh yeah that reminds me
a recent patch note said they changed some details on renown's model.
did they un-fuck her?
model wise, look close or correct to model rendered in wows
recent as in like last few months
- Nagato bridge, exact replica, unlikely given the continuous improvements over each BB of the IJN
- Retention of all 152mm casemate guns, despite more Type 89 12.7cms added on.
If I had to guess
Funnel is a also in the sussy zone, but it's a pass for me because it looks damn good.
Both Renowns are fucked.
Repulse is fucked, too.
Any post-1941 portrayal of Renown would have 4 torpedoes only - the amidship torpedo section was blanked off and welded shut during or before her refit at Rosyth during 1942.
Portholes are inaccurate when cross examined with photos of Renown at Trincomalee (1944) and Devonport (1945).
Likely just referring to the lod models
Ah, and forgot, both Repulse and Renown's main turrets are wrong.
Right now, they're using the "edge faced" turrets used on the battleships, whereas they should have a smooth curvature front face.
Likely due to asset reuse, so I'll let it slip.
Also noteworthy that Vanguard's turrets are smoothfaced as they were stolen from Courageous and Glorious, and improved upon.
And before someone posts War Thunder's Renown, theirs too is wrong, with shitty "fridge doors" on torpedo tubes, which only existed on Hood and Repulse.
random question... so vanguard was supposed to be outfitted with triple 406s iirc.. but ended up getting outfitted with 381s due to the time it took to get her 406mm turrets would said 406mm turrets be similar to those of Nelson and Rodney?
I hope not
no, the Lions would have had different 16-inchers than Nelson and Rodney
iirc that's why they would've taken so long
ah
Vanguard was never slated for 406s
silver can explain better than I can
Vanguard was an "oh shit, we need a BB fast" and was derived from Lion
The Lion's 16" guns are of an entirely new construction, and would resemble the KGV's flat faced turrets more
Trials were underway as of 1942 before the project was canned
yeah basically the admiralty figured that they couldn't finish the Lions in time, but what they could do is modify a Lion design and give it guns that they already had in storage
and then as the war went on they slowed her construction to incorporate newer lessons
ah okay..
This is Vanguard, as designed
As well as eventually coming to the realization that their opponents are losing their BBs faster than they can build them, so it wasn't that urgent to get a new one
The lines scream Lion in all aspects until the funnel tests in 1944
(which a certain youtube historian magically puts on a refitted Hood, sure buddy)
Not only that, but British shipyards are basically overworked to death
They have to keep pumping out escorts, the WEP destroyers, etc.
interesting... and the Lions would've been three turreted no? or am I just taking the WOWs model of the Lion as the "fact" when it could be turbo inaccurate
Which meant that the R class, Barham, and Malaya would never receive their due refits and are second rate by nature
As of the finalized design in 1938, yes.
But by 1945, they are looking at two turret variants, including ones with autoloading variant that can trim reload down to around 20 seconds.
WG Lion's main issue is the lack of a rear director (which would be mounted on Turret 3), and a fucking Hazemeyer AA mount on Turret B
Which is basically "please kill me" for the Hazemeyer
With how effect wows aa is, there probably isn’t even a gunner for that haze

ontop of turret 2? that exposed?
No, kill as in blast interference and the likes
ah
Cleve described the Hazemeyer a few hours ago, so I'm not going to discuss it in detail
minor earth quake wdym
Short is, powered mounts dont go on turrets
sounds about right
It was fine for the US quad bofors and the oerlikon galleries)
US mounts didn't have super fiddly bits on them
hooman man power to move the guns
If I recall, the US never mounted the Mark 51 directors directly on the turrets either
the super fiddly bits called gun directors serving automatic weapons on a USN vessel are positioned as far away from blast/shock/vibration as best as possible
which is sharply in contrast to whatever the fuck the RN got up to
and was an issue entirely foreign to the IJN

the IJN had gun directors for their heavy AA, yes
arguably better ones than the RN ever had
for automatic weapons on the other hand...
I am more thinking about the Germans never noting issues with their automatic fire control equipment for the automatic AA, even tho they were all too happy to throw them onto the turrets as well
Im guessing it had to do with how finnicky the Hazemeyer is compared to other constructions
Just like the Le Prieur sights on the 25mm guns of Yamato
"Remove them before the main guns go off, or they die"
Never read about Hazemeijer having trouble in Dutch service. They had more trouble with pom poms
And they're expensive
The Hasslemere story may be overembellished base on poor maintenance from some crews
I'm thinking more of high caliber naval weapons' interference
Thus why the RN never mounted them on the turrets and chose pom poms instead
It's also weird how the British refused Dutch fixes of the early design.
The brits are quite... Arrogant, shall we say
Quite so yeah
"our guns are 14", but we have 10 of them, and the long service traditions of the men of the Royal Navy shall ensure superior gunnery to the enemy"
Something to that extent to justify the KGVs
Would be funny if they jam- oh fuck.
fire control was similar between different guns, tho best to see here, an on mount computer that you feed the data, and then it transmits it to the holosights for the gunners. Same system was on the 20mm quads, which were mounted on various turrets, and a similar one being probably on the 40mm singles which also made their way onto turret roofs
iirc they did, didnt they...
tfw your fixed guns are operating at ~70% availability vs an average of ~90% in all other navies
They did, yes
Because of copious amounts of flash protection
Can't have Jutland 2 boogaloo
Hazemeyer also has this little problem where powered automatic control is limited to 10 degrees per second
which is
less than ideal
Also, toilet TDS on KGV never ceases to be not funny
What's that, you ate a torpedo?
"the toilet shits back when torpedoed"
toilet explodes
Get water spray to clean the butt
Who would win, explosive diarheaa or explosive torpedo?
It really do be a case of the more you know about the RN the more you facepalm at it
the British were so obsessed with trying to field an on-mount directed twin Bofors they they developed a 20 ton mount with a more advanced director than that used to direct the heavy AA guns
Mmm yas, "AA magazines next to machinery, diejoubu"
The Buster (Bofors Universal Stabilized Tachymetric Electric Radar) twin was another World War II attempt at a self-contained mounting, but at approximately 20 tons (20.3 mt) this weighed far too much for only a twin arrangement and the project was canceled. Used the Mark VIII gun.
yes
it's extremely incongruous
yes
Still looking for reliable data on it
that's heavier than an RN 4" twin mount
the USN Mark 4 Quad Bofors is heccin' SPEEN
the ww2 proliferation of the pom pom basically exists because the British couldn't field Bofors fast enough and were also absolutely neurotic and kept lines open for obsolete weapons for no real reason
"I say chap, we have a new 4" gun to replace the 4" Mk V, should we close down the Mk V line?"
"No, let's keep it open for the whole war and keep making new ones"
They were... Kinda learning in 1945.
Howe was slated to get 14 single bofors at Durham in Sep 1945.
Oops, war ended.
also
pom-pom did have tracers
the RN just didn't check that they worked in the tropics
which is

Not on the Prince of Wales at least.
where a lot of their empire was
The tropical question.
Oops, the lone 40mm single bofors at the back is better at scaring the bombers off when the power switch went off
so you know how the US will test equipment across conditions ranging from say, Southwest desert, to North west rainforest, to Alaskan tundra, to Rocky mountains?
apparently the RN just kind of... neglected to do that kind of thing?
Just ditch fire control, give tracer to the heavy AA and walk the shots to the target

"this territory belongs to us and we might have to fight for it some day"
"should we test equipment under the conditions there?"
"preposterous, we're the british"
"Just hold the line until reinforcements arrive in Hong Kong, say, around 3 months"
Neglects defence, little manpower, gets overrun in just 3 weeks
Pain
though I guess it's a tradition
stares at Type 45's problems with...

warm water
like how germany still builds overweight ships with funny weight distribution problems
Do we have a new Rommel ship yet 
It was 5 x 8 + 4 on Turret B, IIRC
Then reinforced with a measly 2 x quad bofors around 1944
"yes, we absolutely should have multiple types of 40mm aboard the same ship"
then again... there's...
3 different non-interchangeable 37mm AA cartridges used by germany simultaneously
and...

4 different non-interchangeable 20mm in the luftwaffe alone
Should see some of the late war improvised AA fits on certain botes
Those were messy
One 40mm Bofors they "borrowed" from the army, four 37mm Bredas, and a mix of Flak38 and Breda 20mm guns, and I think they also had some captured Oerlikons on her (below the third gun)
Just whatever you could find laying around
Belfast wasn't easy to get around lol
Finally the HMS Glasgow is in the water
holy shit it finally is 
Now have to wait 6 years to be fitted out
And then another year to commission it ;-;
Strong American ship 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 💪 💪 💪

Fuso is back baby
The AK-47 is easily both the most famous and infamous firearm in all of the world’s history. With over 100 million made, its appearance in over half a century of cinema, and its place within the hands of players in hundreds of video games, the Avtomat Kalashnikova model of 1947 is undeniably the most recognisable weapon ever made.
With the help...
i assume it has something to do with the fact there's so many of them i could go dig around in my back yard for a few hours and find six of them
55 votes and 7 comments so far on Reddit
I had a brainthought about countries using replacing older military tech
It's like the fire department, the leather coats, open topped apparatus that firefighters rode on the back
They are really cool but theres a reason why they were replaced
y...yeah?
https://twitter.com/CiroNappi6/status/1599371946793136130
https://twitter.com/CiroNappi6/status/1599371952418086915
https://twitter.com/CiroNappi6/status/1599371958591684608
Am I the only one who gets Avro Vulcan vibes from this one?
man’s house is built on top of a ancient AK burial ground
her majesty's ASS talwart
ASS 
Ass 
Does anyone know why America can throwing out hundereds of aircraft carrier back in WW2 like free cardboard boxes but now 10 aircraft carriers already considered level 100 mob boss even compared to other rich European countries.
?
first
count the number of full sized carriers actually involved for each navy in WW2
What is 'full sized' here?
Isn't any carrier that can carry more than a dozen aircrafts are basically aircraft carriers?
no

So what is the actual numbers then?
the wiki said the US have slightly over a hundred carrier and they're still pumping out more for the war
Most of those carriers can't handle modern planes
There's 2 factors one should consider:
A) The level of conflict in the world and military spending
B) The size (i.e. displacement) of the carriers
The so-called “weekly aircraft carriers” in WWII were escort carriers, converted merchantman hulls with a flight deck on top. Too short to handle high-performance fighters, mostly relegated to land bombing, ASW patrols, and convoy escort (which is all they needed to do anyway). The fleet carrier (CV) and even light carrier (CVL) numbers are much smaller
Also, normally you don’t increase the national debt several hundred percent for naval construction in peacetime…
his majestys im afraid
gonna need some time to get used to that still
also the first Charles since some 3 centuries ago, with the first with that name losing his head and the second going into exile before ultimately coming back and be remembered as at best, lazy and indolent
firstly theres a noted difference between a fleet carrier, an escort carrier and a light carrier
fleet carriers are massive ships, mostly weighing upwards of 20'000t, designed to be fast enough to keep up with fleets and operate a large combined airgroup, consisting of bombers, torpedo planes and fighters, with the smallest fleet carriers having an airgroup somewhere in the range of 60 aircraft typically, generally with a top speed of around 30kn to help them to launch aircraft in even the poorest of wind conditions (exceptions exist), they are costly ships that take years to build and require the combined investment of a insignificant part of a nations economic output to produce and maintain
During WW2 the US Navy operated approximately 30 of these, 24 Essex class, 3 Yorktowns, 2 Lexingtons and Wasp
the IJN operated approximately 11 of these types of various classes
The Royal Navy operated 10 fleet carriers including 4 Illustrious class ships
an escort carrier is the smallest of ships, these typically are little more than a cargo or passenger ship that's had its superstructure ripped off and replaced with a flight deck and some hangar space, ships like these would weigh less than 10'000t and were very slow, around 18kn for the Bogue class owing to their civilian heritage. These ships aren't designed to fight other warships but instead carry a small air wing of anti-submarine aircraft and some fighters, to protect convoys from threats at range, but without the ability to seriously hurt an enemy fleet (that's not to say they couldn't do it but it wasn't typically their role), they are exceptionally cheap ships that can be readily mass produced to fulfil their required role of escorting the countless convoys flowing across the Atlantic
These ships were built in their hundreds by the British and Americans, and were also interestingly operated by the Imperial Japanese Army (thanks inter-service rivalry), they were small cheap and narrow in capability, but good at what they were designed for
light carriers meanwhile fit in the middle of these two extremes, typically in the range of 10'000t, they are significantly faster than escort carriers, but typically slower than their fleet carrier counterparts, allowing them to launch modern aircraft but not necessarily keep up with a fleet, allowing them to fulfil supplementary roles where an entire fleet carrier would be a waste of resources but an escort carrier would be incapable, such as providing air defence to a landing site while the fleet carriers are off chasing down the main enemy task force, or simply supplementing a fleet carriers air-group allowing for additional aircraft to be deployed
The US Navy operated 11 of these ships in WW2
The British built 20 of these ships in WW2, although not all were completed before the end of the war, most famously the Colossus and Majestic classes would sold off and become the backbone of many navies world-wide
Japan would build 7 of these ships, however many of them were so lightly built their actual combat utility was often limited
Modern American super-carriers are the evolution of the fleet carrier concept, they are designed to be the centrepiece of their task forces, able to deploy an air wing larger than the entire air forces of most countries, they are such a gargantuan investment that very few countries are capable of or willing to make such an investment, and those who are only do so because they have global power projection requirements
Also note that the CVE role is somewhat displaced nowadays since helicopters have proliferated and overtaken most of the ASW role
amusingly some CVEs had exceptionally long service lives... as helicopter carriers
💀 just realised i forgor midway class
tbf so did a lot of CVLs
the Spanish had an Independence in service in the 80s flying Harriers and Sea Kings
worth noting that RN CVLs are also a bit special in regards to their build standards
as the state of British military yards meant letting the civilian yards build them, and there wasn't time to bring them up to military spec
well, either of the two military specs
the normal and the discount
why was accepting parts below standard at reduced cost to the British government even a thing anyway
yeah HMAS Sydney had to be withdrawn from service early and modified as a troop transport as her superstructure wasnt capable of withstanding the force of aircraft landings without a very expensive rebuild due to degradation over time, and it was determined to be simply excessive
HMAS Melbourne meanwhile was purchased well before completion and RAN had to spend the better part of a decade not only modifying her design with an angled flight deck and other modern ammenities but also shoring up the superstructure and overall strengthening it to allow the ship to stay in service for longer
some of the 1942s were better than others build quality wise but the ones that were bad didnt stay in service much after the 50s, especially not with fixed wing operations
Karel Doorman/Veintecinco de Mayo basically only stayed in service because she was gutted by a fire so the Argentines bought her for cheap and did a full rebuild, the Dutch were just going to scrap her because it just wasn't worth it
Vikrant needed an entire rebuild to keep her in service beyond the late 60s too
if you want to add extra confusion there's the fleet carriers which were liner conversions in the IJN
the
the 24kn fleet carrier
the slow conversions and the fast conversions
And somehow people still have the gall to call Wasp the "worst carrier"

wasp was a good girl and she tried her best
Wasp trades protection to keep up to a speed and offensive standard
the liner conversions trade all of these
in exchange for being easily converted

In exchange for avoiding treaty limits

and then the pilot pool is too small to fully man every carrier anyway
oops, all your intended pilots died flying long range escort missions at the limit of their endurance against an enemy with constant early warning

b-but muh spirit of the emperor
"why are we getting dived on by flying barrels?"
and other questions to ask yourself before bursting into flames
my soldiers were all so courageous and forswore technology in favour of their indomitable human spirit and belief in the emperor how could they possibly have lost
they had such manly recruitment ads
and then the absolute slaughter that happened when USN and USMC Corsair units got pushed forward to land bases in the Solomons
🤌
(which is where the in-game VF-17 "Pirate" Squadron gained its reputation, for those of you in the audience)
Why does British conflict with Germany on Atlantic Ocean is called Battle of Atlantic?
Shouldn't it be considered more as a campaign due to the length?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_the_Atlantic
The Battle of the Atlantic, the longest continuous military campaign in World War II, ran from 1939 to the defeat of Nazi Germany in 1945, covering a major part of the naval history of World War II. At its core was the Allied naval blockade of Germany, announced the day after the declaration of war, and Germany's subsequent counter-blockade. The...
On 5 March 1941, First Lord of the Admiralty A. V. Alexander asked Parliament for "many more ships and great numbers of men" to fight "the Battle of the Atlantic", which he compared to the Battle of France, fought the previous summer
Churchill claimed to have coined the phrase "Battle of the Atlantic" shortly before Alexander's speech, but there are several examples of earlier usage.
TLDR its the Brits that coined the term
Did the Brits or German used any aircraft carrier on Atlantic Ocean btw? Are their tactics similar to the ones in the Pacific if they did used it?
German
Using aircraft carriers
They didnt even have a single one operational
the entire concept of an escort carrier was to protect the Atlantic convoys from German submarines
the British first tried to escort their convoys with fleet carriers
but then they lost a couple to submarines so they started shitting out small cheap escort carriers instead
There's also the successful MAC ships
and in terms of tactics well
there werent any fleet carrier battles in the Atlantic because only 1 side had any carriers
the Mediterranean was a more active theatre for fleet carrier operations but again, no one except the Allies actually had any carriers
The Germans didn't have much surface presence either.
in the Mediterranean both sides more frequently uses ground based aircrafts anyway given that pretty much the entire are are close by to at least one Axis/Allied base, with maybe the Eastern Mediterranean being off limit to the Axis
Isn't there also disagreement in Italian military about whose authority it was over aircraft for aircraft carrier? Like the Regina Aeronautica don't like the idea of Regina Marina have their own air force and the reason above about how the entire Italian Penisula can provide long range air cover.
Slight elaboration on the CVE part, a rough third of these "hundred" carriers are the "Casablanca" class carriers, with a short enough flight deck that FM-2 Wildcats are often deployed on them rather than the F6F.
Many of the US CVLs are also "conversions", as the Independence and Saipan class would show.
Finally, there is the interesting case of the Japanese Hiyou class carriers, built from the keel up as Ocean Liners but with conversions already planned ahead, as the funding of the two ships were provided by the military.
more or less. I'm not the go-to guy for it, that'll be Undie, but my understanding is that the Italian high command has very complex arrangements regarding how to procure and direct aviation assets for navy/ground needs which limits flexibilities and response time, even when the hardware and servicemen are generally competent
And I forgot to mention, CVEs later into the war also get turned into assisting with picket duty
USS Shamrock Bay's FM-2s helped in Laffey 724's struggle against the 52 kamikazes.
the RN only built 6 CVEs
the other 38 were all lend lease from the US
34 of which were the majority of the 45 Bogue class CVEs
split into the Attacker and Ruler class
3 more were US built Avenger class
and the final was Long Island's sister
We even received one of those bogues (hms biter) Dixmude in french service
Forgot the US name

Ok nvm it was an avenger class cve
on the US side there were:
1 Long Island (2 ship class, 1 to the RN)
1 Avenger (4 ship class, 3 to the RN)
4 Sangamon
11 Bogue (45 ship class, 34 to the RN)
50 Casablanca
19 Commencement Bay

Goddamn
born
Jason Bearn
for some daft reason the wiki page for "list of escort carriers by country" counts all 45 RN CVEs as built by the RN

Probs counts MACs and stuff
Ass 

ye
looks like RAAF is helping train the RAF on their Wedgetails
senior MoD personnel arrived in Canberra today/yesterday
guessing we'll do the same for the Americans
Besides the differences in carrier types, modern fleet CVNs are utterly massive - at around 110,000t (a late retrofit nimitz or a ford), it's about three Essexes or about 2.25 midways. Not to mention the cost of being full cats & traps, nuclear power, complete radar and and battlegroup command....
*Regia. 'Regina' is 'queen', whereas 'Regia' is 'Royal'.
The issue for carriers in Italy ran even deeper than that. In WWI the Regia Marina had raised its own naval air arm, which filled basically every role - recon, ASW, fighter escort, torpedo bombing, etc - and this continued into the 1920s. Keep in mind that at this point in time there was no air force, there was only the army (Regio Esercito) air corps and navy air corps.
However, after the fascist takeover, an independent air force was created, the Regia Aeronautica. This branch of the military was well connected to the fascist party and was intended by Mussolini to act as a political counterweight, along with the blackshirt militas, to the army and navy. Over the course of the 1920s, they slowly took more and more control of the air arms of the other branches until finally decreeing that all fixed-wing avaiation belonged to the air force alone, and then went even further by limiting the allowed role of the navy's hydroplane/flying boat squadrons.
From this point on, the air force did pretty much whatever it could to prevent the navy from having an argument for reclaiming it's air arm. This included doing things like denying the need for an aircraft carrier (and making claims like the 'Italy is a massive aircraft carrier' that they knew perfectly well were false), and rejecting torpedo bombing as an anti-shipping method in favor of level bombing. This situation persisted up until the end of the 1930s, with the air force only relenting on torpedo bombing in 1939 (but that still remained under the air force).
Throughout this period, it was generally agreed upon that authority over the aircraft on any potential carriers would belong to the air force, even if the navy operated the ship. However, the difficulties the navy had actually getting the air force to work with them on a carrier pushed procurement back further and further (the navy made requests every year for a pair of 15,000-ton ships in the late 1930s). This situation also appeared about to work itself out in 1939, but the outbreak of war, and the air force's chief of staff changing from Giuseppe Valle (who was finally coming around on the carrier question) to the 'air power for air force only' hardliner Francesco Pricolo killed the effort.
The Vought XF5U "Flying Flapjack" was an experimental U.S. Navy fighter aircraft designed by Charles H. Zimmerman for Vought during World War II. This unorthodox design consisted of a flat, somewhat disc-shaped body (hence its name) serving as the lifting surface. Two piston engines buried in the body drove propellers located on the leading edge...
How OP this plane will be if it enters AL?
Would this powercrept the current strongest?
if
Aaaaaaaa
The US Asiatic fleet is just why
And I thought the CIC Signapore was bad
as far as AL goes its pretty standard
57s 57s 57s 57s
It's gold in game so
Don't expect much power
There's your French UR, now stfu
Next update is French tech centric and I can already feel the insufferable "Bonjour" vibe from Richie half a way across the globe.
drown in it
Vive la Marine
Hey y’all I’m at the library y’all want anything
projectiles
You have a nice library 
Ikr
I need to go to Amsterdam and the Navy Museum to get a collection that good
maybe it's bc we're near norfolk and all that but we've got a ton of military stuff
even booklets from the army war college
What model is this
Pics say thats 2a7 but what is that turret side armour
Man
Imagine if Norfolk looked like Yokosuka
Yokosuka got drip
Norfolk looks boring

College of William and Mary

Bro holy shit
I turn around and there’s books on fencing right behind the navy stuff

Fencing is crucial for the navy
Stops the sailors from going overboard
I’m excited because I fence and I’m trying to do a project on it, and haven’t found many academic sources yet
I was about to ask if you fence in archaic or modern terms 
are you going for the good ole foil or full blown HEMA?
I do Foil
Noice
Soviet Naval Strategy 
I do Longsword, mostly self-study on Ringeck and Talhoffer.
A bit of Hutton's sabre as well.
You obviously shouldn't arm yourself untill you are invaded
The damn Venezuelans
excellent
Project 1961 
Fun fact: there's THREE entirely different 2A7s
Because Germany
Actually, there's four come to think about it...
Anyhow, that's a very rare 2A7 vanilla
Those were Dutch 2A6NLs loaned to Canada and upgraded to 2A6M CAN standards. They got returned to Germany (when Canada bought brand new ones), and used to demonstrate a major electronics refit and some other changes. There's 20 of them.
(To make things extra confusing, there is 2A7(V), 2A7+, and 2A7A1)
hmmm . . .quite interest
The 2A7A1s are 2A7(V)s fitted with Trophy. 2A7(V) is the new standard production variant for the Bundeswehr and virtually all earlier tanks including the 'vanilla' 2A7s will be updated to it. It includes the 2A7 vanilla upgrades plus some extras.
When all tanks are finished being rebuilt to 2A7(V), the (V) will be dropped and it will just be 2A7
The 2A7+ are new build vehicles, with all of the upgrades of the 2A7(V), some extras, and built on the Leopard 2 Improved hull & chassis like STRV 122, 2A6HEL, and 2A6E.
Clear as mud? Leo 2 subvariants is a nightmare.
With that said when its done the 2A7(V) program will massively simplify things - there's like 6 configs of Leopard 2 being used just in the bundeswehr
For example this is a Leopard 2A6MA3, and yes that is a real designation
Bro every time I hear a7v I think of the ww1 tank
i do into a blind rage because im thinking about germoney
yos
Puma captured by Libyan rebels
counter strike car
With a 4500 dollar skin
Kmw said this was a 2a7 but i dont recall any 2a7 with the strv-122 turret roof
ayo?
Nooooooo
Fuuuck
Invictus was better 
invictus is for the Future Attack Reconnaissance Aircraft program
Raider!
That's right Raider
It was Raider who fought against V-280 right
Or did Raider try to do both as Attack and transport variants
the black hawk replacement bid was between the Bell 280 Valor and the Sikorsky/Boeing SB-1 Defiant
curious to see how this choice will pan out
Ok ok yeah Defiant is transport variant of Invader
the Osprey's shown the merits of tiltrotor aircraft so its a decently safe choice
the Valor has good speed, but being a tiltrotor it'll need a larger landing footprint
Bell reminds me Mi-30. I'm glad she won then 
From the classic AK-47 and AKM rifles through to reproductions like the Chinese Type-56, our favourite shooters have featured plenty of the iconic Russian firearm. In this bonus episode of Loadout, Keeper of Firearms & Artillery Jonathan Ferguson breaks down and compares a variety of different AK rifles.
In this episode of Loadout, Dave Jewitt ...
found in a 1981 report on the Forger
or wait not the forger itself
actually I'm not sure what aircraft this report is on
maybe the Su-27?
the report's from 1981 and it's talking about a new twin-engine fighter, possibly from sukhoi, that they believe is being developed for carrier operations
they call it RAM-L
so mig 29?





🤝 





