#history
1 messages · Page 34 of 1
I mean the main cost there is the mass of missiles your dumping
so sometimes it may be more appealing to just fly a C-17 or something just outside of an enemy’s range and launch their payload
tho thing I'm most curious about
is this gonna end up phasing out the B-52 as the missile bus
I doubt it
At least, not immediately
but in terms of missile busing
its about as good as a B-52 in terms of payload
on a much newer airframe
I’m not up to scratch with their carrying capacities but I’d imagine the B52 can carry stuff more efficiently than other aircraft
The B-52 is probably still going to be the statement bomber for those extra spicy fuck-you payloads
is a JASSM roughly the same size as a tomahawk or nah?
just about
B-2 (soon B-21) will be for discreet delivery
The hope for B21 is that it becomes the mainstay bomber
Oh, it probably will at some point
tho if there's anything I'm willing to bet on B-52s will probably be flinging missiles at the covenant over New Mombasa before its ever retired
honestly the B-21s likely will
B-52s are nice for when you want to carry a ton of shit and you don’t have to worry about being shot down
I've had some initial worries about it taking over the lancer role
tho upon further pondering it likely won't matter
the other question I’d have is whether rapid dragon is something intended for wide adoption or if it’s just another tool in the toolbox
Probably both
Inb4 the B-52's life is further extended by shoving some more engines into it
idk the main use I can see out of the concept is in the long run deploying decoy munitions and loitering munitions
B52’s are being re-engined afaik
I'm largely guessing we're gonna end up with some cursed 747 conversion or some shit for that in the 2050s
B-52 has survived far longer than it should.
How long can the B-52 airframe hold on till again?
But it seems the end is in sight.
Nah not yet
F-15: Air Superiority Supremacy
F-22: Air Superiority Supremacy fuck you
and its getting engine replacements along with a lot of upgrades in its next set of rebuilds
NGAD: speeeeeeeeeeed
F-35: Air fuck you
the F-35 is less fuck you than F-22 tho
depends on your opinions on IRSTs
no
F-22 is just for the air, hence why I crossed "air" out for F-35
I remember something, Michael Bay didn't use the B-52 in any of his Transformer, not it mission profile or something else?
A rifle behind every blade of grass and a tomahawk behind every 747
Didn't the US military actively promote stuff there?
a few of the movies
have used actual Abrams and other shit provided by the military
I'm honestly surprised LockMart allowed Starscream to become an F-22
one of the more recent ones was just downright NASA porn for 15 minutes straight
A lot of times, their contracts stipulate their planes can only be flown by the protagonist
The military’s got some requirement when they let people use equipment for films
Usually it’s “don’t make us look bad”
starscream is very popular, and the captain of the seekers through performance
Which makes me wonder how that one scene in Iron Man got greenlit
but is he forklift certified?
Probably, let's be real
Yeah it’s CGI
The scene in 1st movie?
anyway
Still uses the F-22
and?
Yeah, Iron Man 1
iron man had more trouble playing around with the f22s then entire regiments in the middle east scene
I don't think "wing sheared off by a flying tin can" satisfies "don't make us look bad"
the iron man suit even at that point is probably the most advanced thing on the planet
Short of whatever Hydra was dicking around with back in the 40s
shearing off a plane wing is not impressive considering it later gets hit with a tank round and it dinks off
god I forgot even marvel went wehrb there for a bit
The B-52 is one of an illustrious club of aircraft that have been in service for the majority of aviation.
Still amaze me that USN got the carrier concept mostly right with they barely miss the carrier task force right before the war
Don't forget the AN-2, the ugly thing still flying in some place
How fiction sees the nazis: obsessed with Norse mythology, mere steps away from technological domination
How the nazis really were: “maybe if I get funding for this I won’t get drafted”
MiG-21 is the only real competitor for being upgraded so heavily.
F-5 and MIG-21
Too much "History channel"
Basically becomes a contest of "how many times can this thing be taken apart and put back together before it breaks"
MiG-21 derivatives upgraded to ludicrous extremes are in production right now!
has gotten the stupidest amount of upgrades
and then you have Thailand smacking modern radars and AMRAAMs on their F-5s
Let me guess, NK?
F4: “was I a good multirole jet?”
More than B-52 can say!
Well, someone have to sell stuff to those poor 3rd world country
Nein, Pakistan.
when we’re already comfortably within spam-bombing requirements
Pakistan and China
PLAAF still use the J-7 in large numbers
and they have some rather
heavily modernized versions
B-52s sending a personal “fuck you” from the US to Iraq in 1991
Jeff: What are "generational boundaries?"
tbf, why would thai's military need top of the line aircraft when their chief enemy are insurgent in the south and whatever civilian goverment that run the country
its bordering multiple countries it has tense relations with
and half of its arsenal is stuck in the 1960s
the F-5 modernization is occurring alongside procurement of JAS-39s
and a bunch of Chinese Anti Aircraft systems
Well, most of them are in ASEAN and Cambodian are not really a military powerhouse
JF-17 doesn't care what aircraft designers think is impossible.
Cambodia and Burma are the primary concerns
that coupled with the Thai military being well
rather powerful in the nations politics
this is the nation that bought a aircraft carrier to turn into a royal yacht once its harriers service lifes ran out
Well, they do have rep in the region for questionable military purchase
Case in point, they're buying Gripens.
F-5s still valuable to nations like the ROC, South Korea due to their short take off distances and readiness rates
Hey, they make questionable decision most of the time but it doesn't mean there isn't someone who have a right mind
combined with still being used by a lot of poorer nations
idk the Gripen purchase made sense
since its politically neutral
Which surprisingly one of their good decision
there trying to balance American and Chinese influence
JAS-39 is a good choice for them since its politically neutral while still being capable with their US made shit
Politically neutral for now.
purchasing from a EU supplier is more neutral than purchasing directly from the US
same way how buying from South Korea is more politically neutral than buying from the US
they might be US aligned countries/blocs but they still maintain close relations to China
Oi
B-52 and TU-95 as grandmas of modern bombers 
Gripen C made sense, it's Gripen E that takes the butt of NCD's joke
wouldn't it be b29 then
Perhaps. TU-95 likely shares lot of blood from TU-4
I'm sure Undef agrees
italy: italy

eh
found what that one platform in Ace Combat 7 Fleet Destruction mission was based off of
Gripen has critical US made components subject to US export controls, as well as the usual British export controls via the ejection seat
Like, "plane will not fly without these" critical parts
Incidentally I had an interesting run through the parts suppliers of Eurofighter and Rafale and found the same situation. Just the parts of more mundane and normally wouldn't be thought of.
that is true
Can't they buy such parts from France?
Or does France have same problem
but its still more politically neutral
Question: What is a Battle Monitor
Sure. But you need to now totally redesign and reprogram the plane.
Because the engine has changed
And the flight computer has changed as well
Among other things
When you get down to what parts are important in a modern fighter
Gripen is borderline a US fighter in a bodykit
Which is why it's been incredibly unattractive for export
Because you're getting less than you would compared to going straight to the source if you're able to pass those export restrictions
And if you can't pass then you can't buy Gripen anyway
Also Sweden's politics until relatively recently were more toxic for a potential buyer than being seen aligning towards the US because Sweden's policies regarding why and when they'll refuse to continue exporting and providing support were perceived to be simultaneously more restrictive and less defined
Aselsan 25mm STOP remote weapon system
It's for use against small craft approaching the ship, for the most part - this one covers the bow arcs

future of conventional war https://vxtwitter.com/RikeFranke/status/1595027119217803266
Holy sh**!
(Is my expert opinion)
#AI #drone
Omg new R6 gadget
yeah your gonna hunt everyone to death with your loitering micro drone
Omg they made the c4 drone from war zone 2 into a real thing

Couldn’t you hear that thing unless you’re sitting next to a firing machine gun tho
‘Arrows vs Armour’ is back and we are shooting medieval war arrows at the top half of an armoured knight using armour and arrows that are correct in every detail. The main film shows exactly what happened to the armour and the arrows.
Of course plate armour could be made from a variety of iron and steel types – they are not all the same, there...
Finally
‘Arrows vs Armour’ is back and we are shooting medieval war arrows at the top half of an armoured knight using armour and arrows that are correct in every detail. This film shows exactly what happened…….
Thousands of knights were slain by the English archers at battles like Agincourt, even though they wore full armour; we just didn’t know how ...
God dammit drach
There is nothing that can't be replaced easily by other suppliers. Hanwha Aerospace produces critical parts for GE but they could find new suppliers in a week.
Our post on 10 August this year covered the two incidents and immediate aftermath, during which Eisenhower asked correspondents to refrain from reporting on the story. Fast forward to now and the story is public. Newspaper columnist and radio talk show host Drew Pearson goes public about the event, which he was informed of by his friend Ernest Cuneo who worked for the OSS, on his radio show, on 21 November 1943. He excitedly talks of Eisenhower reprimanding General Patton and states confidently that Patton would never be used in combat again.
On 22 November, a spokesperson for Allied HQ in Algiers will go on to state that ˝General Patton has never been reprimanded at any time by General Eisenhower.˝ The Senate Military Affairs Committee will request a report from Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson on 24 November. Stimson will explain that: ˝It was considered necessary to immediately and categorically deny the false implication that a change had or would take place in the command of the Seventh Army. This may have been an error from a public relations standpoint, but it was eminently sound from a military standpoint.˝ (Daily News New York, 14 Dec 1943).
The story going public will prove to be more of an issue for senior leadership than for Patton professionally. Time Magazine will write on 6 December: ˝On the people's mind was, as grass-root William Allen White's Emporia Gazette stated in plain singletalk, the question whether they can "believe the reports and statements of our leaders ...in this war." The people did not shout for General Patton's scalp. There were editorial shouts and much dinner-table clamor… Newspapermen began to reconsider whether they should go on complying, as they did in the Patton case, with a commander's strongly worded proposal to keep from the U.S. people facts that the people are entitled to know.˝
From: Patton and Truth, Time Magazine, 6 December 1943
Picture: Lieutenant Colonel Lyle Bernard, Colorado, 30th Infantry Regiment., talking with Lieutenant General George S. Patton. Near Brolo. 1943.
Source: National Archives Catalog, 531335```
it works great up until the moment someone turns on a stronger transmitter than what you're using
nevermind an actual jammer
🥱
also
you know
you're emitting
Spread spectrum is a thing
thats also just assuming it works as well as its shown even in ideal conditions
i mean
haven't we seen this being used in current events?
and even with a low rate of success with interference, the threat alone would be extremely beneficial
but..why tho
this is a country that didnt get akatsiya exports isnt it
@tough quail YAK-141 tests 
India did not
They used the M-46 catapult instead
It's a locally made Vickers MBT with a fixed superstructure containing a 130mm M-46 field gun.
i forgot to reply earlier but good yak
They did the same thing with the arjunk
Would have probably been the best use of the arjunk chassis they have built
yeeeeeeeah
I feel countermeasures will likely catch up
tho I do have to say the entire idea of your jammers/SHOARD failing and having a entire horde of loitering munitions descend upon you does sound rather terrifying
It kinda blanked on me that 130mm field guns are still pretty much in widespread use
Always thought they got phased out by 122m/152mm howitzers


Evans: Pathetic.
Bison: Also pathetic.
quick delivery guns
unannounced surprise retrofit
oopsie
what can i say im a fan
@spring briar very subjective but

Bro what the fuck is that
Which one is China
The glassed bit of the southern warlords, the also glassed bit puppet state of the central dynasty, or something else
What even qualifies as a victory
Greece 89 is a big ???
Shit chart is shit
on an accurate chart
would france still be top I wonder
definitely top 5
at least
Napoleonic wars:
but defining what country is which at every point in time is gonna be hard
For China? 100000 civilian got eaten alive, Tang strategic victory!
Wonder if Roman Empire would be number 1 in list
Indian victories 
like are they counting all the massacres?
Pleasd, eating people is the least insane shit here

Popular folklore suggests a local warlord just strolled into a city, took everyone and just beheaded them
Reason: humans do not contribute to nature
Allegedly a plaque marked with "kill kill kill kill kill kill kill" was erected
this is why you just look at the major wars and how many a country participated in and how many they won
in which case france is doing great

Zhang Zhongchang is the most utterly spastic Chinese warlord ngl
Lets be honest, how many of those victory are of royal French house vs their vassals
There are some pretty crazy ones
quite a few
but then again we also did so many wars against others
What would be the kingdom name of America
we literally fought everyone
British America
Goujian lost to Wu, became a prisoner, literally ate the shit of Fuchai of Wu to gain his trust and return home
Then literally deployed horny bait to ruin Fuchai harder
why would they make a monarchy after becoming independent from another monarchy
And then raising an army and curbstomping his kingdom entirely after 3 years

Persistence, if not based
Because it's their monarchy 
Fun fact the word president as in national leader comes from cricket club presidents
no
it comes from the latin princeps

actually president is from the latin praesidens
which is literally 'to preside over'
Bergführer 
prince comes from princeps

prince alexei
the tsesarevich

that moment when Russia switched sides and joined Prussia in the 7 years war
WHY

you were the chosen one!
Yes that's the etymology but John Adams used the word to describe the national leader from cricket club presidents
oh
that's cute
anyways the 7 years war pisses me off


you had them krem
FdG was almost destroyed

The carefully coded word in the agreement proved no less catalytic for the other European powers. The results were absolute chaos. Empress Elizabeth of Russia was outraged at the duplicity of Britain's position. Not only that, but France was enraged and terrified, by the sudden betrayal of its only ally, Prussia. Austria, particularly Kaunitz, used this situation to their utmost advantage. Now-isolated France was forced to accede to the Austro-Russian alliance or face ruin. Thereafter, on 1 May 1756, the First Treaty of Versailles was signed, in which both nations pledged 24,000 troops to defend each other in the case of an attack. This diplomatic revolution proved to be an important cause of the war; although both treaties were ostensibly defensive in nature, the actions of both coalitions made the war virtually inevitable.
...
never trust the Prussians
nor the Hannoverians
FdG must have some ridiculous luck, dude make war with almost everyone, beat back to almost lose his kingdom and still somehow turn the whole war around
Britain now threatened to withdraw its subsidies if Frederick did not consider offering concessions to secure peace. As the Prussian armies had dwindled to just 60,000 men and with Berlin itself about to come under siege, the survival of both Prussia and its king was severely threatened. Then on 5 January 1762 the Russian Empress Elizabeth died. Her Prussophile successor, Peter III, at once ended the Russian occupation of East Prussia and Pomerania (see: the Treaty of Saint Petersburg (1762)) and mediated Frederick's truce with Sweden. He also placed a corps of his own troops under Frederick's command. Frederick was then able to muster a larger army, of 120,000 men, and concentrate it against Austria.[84][page needed] He drove them from much of Silesia after recapturing Schweidnitz, while his brother Henry won a victory in Saxony in the Battle of Freiberg (29 October 1762). At the same time, his Brunswick allies captured the key town of Göttingen and compounded this by taking Cassel.
that's because Peter III was a prussophile
he literally joined Prussia the second Russia was able to deliver the decisive blow
Some say it actually inspired Hitler
Since he had his Portrait in his mansion I think
He likely believed he would have similar luck in the end
Nah, it lure the whole Germany into thinking that a short and decisive battle will win them the whole war
What? Sedan?
?
oh well
our loss in the 7 years war was only the beginning of the best story ever told

And that’s story is?
never heard of the war of american independence?
Let me guess, the American
Man, that must be a very expensive payback, enough to bankrupt the National treasury.
which caused another great story
etc
there is beauty in loss
for all that ends begins anew
Ah, the French. Always find a way to rock Europe and screw with the British.
where you from
Vietnam

So you can say I have some natural affinity against you French
Personally, I blame the Nguyen royal house, their stupidity land us on the French sight in the first place. About the 1st Indochina War, the French. 2nd Indochina War, the American. 3rd Indochina War, the Chinese.
Haiphong incident and the complete farce that followed I completely blame our government for
Well, I always feel like there is some sense of saving face for why the French reinvade us. Ho Chi Minh did offer to keep Vietnam in sone sort of Commonwealth with France but if Vietnam got our independence then the rest of the colonies would follow suit. I kinda understand but not justified in anyway.
Tbf, the only one in my family could claim grievance against the French is my Grandfather but he was too much of a good Buddhist to hold grudges for that long.
listen
sometimes it's better to simply accept the humiliation
refusal to do say has lead many to ruthless bloodshed
it isn't the first time France was forced to give up colonies
It is in the past now, I feel like people question why I don’t hold grudges against France or American is meaningless. I would take a jab or two at their nation but mostly no harm feeling.
sadly a lot of people don't see it that way
The chinese on other hand. Well, that is more recent and I would admit that I never like them, not one bit.
Not to say I don’t enjoy their culture, I love them. But I never like their gov and they hardly give me any reason not to.
China is a weird one
massive population
divided by geography
but always authoritarian rule
You have to, it is the only way China won’t dissolve along theirs ethnic line
such is the way for countries that once ruled a vast empire
their people expect to live by those standards
You see, the thing about China in their history is that it is a necessiting matter for a form of authoritarian rule.
of sorts.
population dictates that sadly
otherwise china would simply fall apart into smaller countries
Last time they tried any form of meritocracy, civil war or internal strife ensues.
Kuo Min Tang learned it the hard way
Sun is always a dreamer, he can talk about dream but reality is harsh and unforgiving
I wouldn't think of Yat Sen as a visionary. A renewer, perhaps, but his ways were way off to be considered a visionary.
Sure, he did brought ideas of a new government after taking over from Qing, but the fact that he didn't get that message across the mainland took a big bite to his spirit or rather, ego.
In turn, he just revisited old histories indirectly by splitting his nation into the north and south.
Well, to most Chinese at that time, they don’t know him, the only reason they would follow him is bc they hate the Qing.
Any Chinese civil war and rebellion can be sum up as hate and frustration of the lower class toward the ruling class and then they got exploited by anyone who got the crave for power, some genuinely want good for the peoples but in the end, nothing changes.
Late reply, but overall I enjoyed the whole presentation despite some points. Also choosing mild steel as the plate material, while approximate to the wrought iron that was historically used, kinda jumped it to at least a century forward 
in context of Agincourt
eh
The thing about previous Chinese revolutionaries, with the exception of some key people in the dynasties, is that they tend to lack either, a, major influence, or b, understanding of the way the people think (at times in the middle of their campaign so they tend to shift their end goal)
mild steel and wrought iron have pretty similar yield strengths
like there's a lot of overlap
wrought iron despite containing little carbon can still be very tough and is very work hardenable
because the Si sort of substitutes the C
very crudely said ofc
the video shows that armor was absolutely effective
and that agincourt wasn't just a glorious longbow >>>>>> knight
like some like to say
like that french knight survived all the shots in the video except maybe that one shoulder and one belly shot
Yeah, but Mild steel as a armor plate material wasn't really a thing until the mid-to-late 15th century when armorers/armorsmiths can get their hands on better quality materials. Even then, the Helmschmieds and Missaglias were already working on medium-carbon, heat treated plates at that time, but they were, well, expensive to make and took a long time to fashion into a full suit.
Well, the English archer have Bills, combine it with their arm strength provide a deadly combo. The French knight did have to charge through rough terrain which slow them. The English Archer dismounted them by killing horse and then have to engaged dismounted knight in melee. The question should be how effective was the polearm are.
That being said, wrought iron can still shatter when not processed correctly, but against iron bodkin arrow that the English used at the time, it can still work surprisingly efficient to deflect it (provided you have enough size and form to ensure its strength). the ones that got this material in the battle on their gear were mostly man-at-arms, so go figure
and um, the Frenchies being a bit unorganized and lacking effective woodland tactics played a factor too. I would say that should they figured out the way to outflanking the archers, the battle would at least go into a more of a pyrrhic victory.
there's a lot more reasons why agincourt failed
a lot more.
One major reason you could say, because they’re French.
it truly does suck to be one of the most militarily, culturally and economically successful countries in history
Tbf, I understand you hate the white flag trope as much as I hate the vietcong joke.
Seriously, they always bring up the stupid pictures of a dude wearing farmer outfit with an AK whenever they mention Vietnam.
Lmao tree memes
At least French people hate the fact they being the butt of the joke while so many of my countrymen buy into the meme like it some kind of fact.
Amazon nation ruled by big muscular women 
Speaking of which
Did Child Kings had any authority at all
Ivan VI, Iván or Ioánn Antónovich (12 August 1740 – 5 July 1764) was an infant emperor of Russia who was overthrown by his cousin Elizabeth Petrovna in 1741. He was only two months old when he was proclaimed emperor and his mother named regent, but the throne was seized in the coup after a year. Ivan and his parents were imprisoned far from the ...
God speed Ivan 6
Child ruler never have power, it was the regent who calling the shot
Yeah makes sense. Tho what prevents mother killing the old brothers and keep the young alive she so can rule
Didn't the Swedish have a child king who did stuff?
Charles XII, sometimes Carl XII (Swedish: Karl XII) or Carolus Rex (17 June 1682 – 30 November 1718 O.S.), was King of Sweden (including current Finland) from 1697 to 1718. He belonged to the House of Palatinate-Zweibrücken, a branch line of the House of Wittelsbach. Charles was the only surviving son of Charles XI and Ulrika Eleonora the Elder....
Yeah him
Pu Yi has entered the chat
15
One of the few exceptions I can think of is Louis the XIV, his regent were either loyal or too busy fighting each other that he managed to reach adult and reclaim his power
Aisin-Gioro Puyi (Chinese: 溥儀; 7 February, 1906 – 17 October, 1967), courtesy name Yaozhi (曜之), was the last emperor of China as the eleventh and final Qing dynasty monarch. He became emperor at the age of two in 1908, but was forced to abdicate on 12 February, 1912 during the Xinhai Revolution. His era name as Qing emperor, Xuantong (Hsuan-tung...
2
Yeah the swedish one is the youngest I've seen who did stuff and wasn't more or less a pawn to a regent or faction
Lmao
Oops
Yep Calorus Rex is one of those few born in a life time
Was emperor from 2-6
Poltava 
incoming Sabaton intensifies
Come on, his enemy was Peter, dude literally survived the cutthroat politic of Russian court. I think he ain’t nobody.
Through a number of successful wars, he captured ports at Azov and the Baltic Sea, laying the groundwork for the Imperial Russian Navy, ending uncontested Swedish supremacy in the Baltic and beginning the Tsardom's expansion into a much larger empire that became a major European power. He led a cultural revolution that replaced some of the traditionalist and medieval social and political systems with ones that were modern, scientific, Westernised and based on the Enlightenment
So Peter I was likely the best Tsar Russia had
@humble mulch Soyuz's love for technology by like 
I would argue Alexander II come second bc of his reform but sadly, Russian ruler have a nasty habit of dying from assassination so it is hearsay of what he might do if he live.
In search of replacing their 'absolutely useless' percussion cap pistols, the British Lancers put in place a sequence of events that would lead to the development of the Enfield Revolver. A strange looking design, Jonathan examines why this pistol failed to impress its buyers and users alike.
Subscribe to our channel for more videos about arms...

The Novgorod Republic was a medieval state that existed from the 12th to 15th centuries, stretching from the Gulf of Finland in the west to the northern Ural Mountains in the east, including the city of Novgorod and the Lake Ladoga regions of modern Russia. The Republic prospered as the easternmost trading post of the Hanseatic League and its Sl...
There was an alternative once
Then uhhhh
Yeah...
Moscow was stronger
eh
Kudos to the Swedish
they had an awesome run
Good runners usually have this uncontrollable urge to attack Russia
only the best take Moscow
You know taking Moscow is a curse
🇩🇪 Wtf
^noob
wehrbs: boohoo the russian asiatic hordes
actual history: soviets outnumbered until 1943

has 4 years of full military production over the allies
Part 2 (by @MattBroAnimations : https://youtu.be/LRoaNxQumhU )
3 and a half months in the making, and its finally done! As you can see, within this 3 months I have improved alot, and as you may notice, some of the earlier scenes looks like shite compared to the later ones.
Music used (in order + timestamps):
(/0:00 - 0:04) ...

my favorite thing is still the notion that everything the allies built was a ripoff of german tech, like the ol' ak
but nobody mentions uh
germans directly copying and producing the yuge soviet/french mortars and svt-40s like five minutes into barbarossa
or fritz-x
aye
or ships
Peter Ulrich of Schleswig-Holstein-Gottorp is not a biased name at all
or bellless torpedo launchers
my most irrational rage over german pseudo science is the praise for them inventing "universal machine guns"
Peter III died in captivity soon after his overthrow, perhaps with Catherine's approval as part of the coup conspiracy.
absolute seething anger

Bro Axis copied Soviet mortars so hard that Romanian straight up just stole the license for their 120mm mortar, and used said mortar to replace howitzers cause they didnt have any
yeap
I hope he suffered

Fucking insane shit lmao
y'all didnt invent shit you just put a belt feed on a fucking terrible lmg and deluded yourselves into thinking HMGs arent real anymore
“Hey their mortars are fucking us up. Why can’t ours be like”
Romanians stealing tooling equipment and hundreds of them: Soon brother they will be ours
the only thing universal about it is how universally shit mg-42s are
Iraq 
This server still has the funniest take I have seen
"Soviet ship quality in 1940s is bad because Chernobly."
-Latias
well no that would be a good thing
that means the heer gets onto the british shore
that's when the fun with the home guard begins

Bro home guard actually getting to use their funny toys would be a good thing
HAHAHAHAH
That's actually a meme
holy fucking shit
Behind every rifle is a flamethrower
@tough quail quod erat demonstrandum
remember these

lmfao
I hate it when media makes redcoats look cocky
it's almost the opposite of what they actually acted like
the british fully knew how good their enemy was
and acted on it
why else did they introduce the new army standard
smh
also thank you jaba i was looking for that
British home guard did not play games
“Home Guard is just a bunch of geezers without their weapons”
Yes, so they made their own. But with more fire.
Come to England, they said. ‘All they petrol you’ll ever want, Jerry,’ they said.
jerrycan't
Tens of thousands of flame fougasse barrels were deployed. Almost all were removed before the end of the war, although, incredibly, a few were missed and their remains have lasted to the present day.[45]
germany and japan waging their warcrime olympics while the homeguard waits in the rafters
waiting
aching in excitement for their chance
all the delights they had to show them
you guys are very eager about petroleum
but also talk about their crimes
HMMM
ooh, baby, do you know what that's worthy~ ooh, hell is a place on earth~
benzene does not react with phosphorous to form phosphorus pentoxide
phosphorus reacts with oxygen to form phosphorus pentoxide
benzene does not contain any oxygen
and the pentoxide does not contain any carbon

Richy my dear
Why do you speak with such words
I cannot comprehend
Fire go brrrr and sends the Germans away
How does this even happen

it's not a war crime if no one has legislated it yet
I don't know the background but I know that the phantom landed on a US carrier accidently or otherwise leading to the Americans vandalizing it
Im just wondering how the pilots didn't realise that they were landing on the wrong ship.
and it was 3 pilots as well..
Iirc one of them had an emergency and the other two followed so they didn't run out of fuel
ah ok

Comparison video of the rate of fire and loading mechanisms of the XM2001 'Crusader' with the M109A6 'Paladin' Self Propelled 155mm Artillery systems. Crusader was cancelled in 2002.
shame what happened to the crusader
the more I learn about the thing more I realized we could of been ahead of the curve in terms of SPGs
meh
at the end of the day the way the artillery parks have worked out around the world results in parity at worst
like AS90 and PzH2000 are cool and all, but the forces which initially fielded them have brought them into service in a way that makes them an inside joke
Which warship has the longest name? 
Probably Abruzzi? i cant think of a longer one
I think so yeah
Some Soviet/Russian ships are probably close there somewhere
Theres a couple of Dutch ships were there's a longer name if you use the whole name but I cant think of any.
Probably take the name as it's appear on the naval register (if available)
Some take the abbreviated name as the proper name
Abruzzi is 34 characters with 5 spaces

then there is her half sister Duca di Savoia with 31 characters and 5 spaces
err
3 spaces
@manic latch any soviet ship with a very long name?
Kuznetsov is like 40 chars 4 spaces
Admiral Flota Sovetskogo Soyuza Kuznetsov

Imagine naming your boat foch
Focher
foch u


Uss Shithole
reminds me of one rtw2 run where I had the same naming scheme as irl cruisers, but I specifically chose cursed cities for every name
Based
my first armored cruiser was USS bacon level
Wonder if you made a nuclear balistic submarine name category of irl mass murderers
Oh
Uss Jack the Ripper
welcome USS state of surprise
Remember when Ukraine made rocket propelled bullets
hms fucktropolis

ukrainian future science
Can't you see this is the land of confusion?
This is the world we live in
And these are the hands we're given
Use them and let's start trying
To make it a place worth living in
Gyrojet my beloved
What was Stalingrad’s special shell weight?
230.5kg
Muzzle velocity?
1300 mps
What
Something is not adding up here
How many atmospheres does that thing fire at?
Soyuz was going to have a similar shell but invasion stopped its development
So only SAP and AP was developed in time 
I wonder if the soviets considered the barrel life
Cause the chamber pressure would be ridiculous
300 for Stalingrad
Sadly lot of things are unknown. We know they build 12 of these guns. And tested in 1949-1951
But yeah most details are hidden 
300
fires a shell with 4 times the normal muzzle energy
i presume barrel life wasnt much of a factor because you'd very rarely be using that kind of shell
Even then
or its a ww2 situation and you're firing inland from port
which is
probably the actual idea
It would in one shot lower the barrel life by like 50
How are you getting any range tables
Here all
Long range is almost x2 of HE lul
Its probably a calculation
Wonder what they "tested" in 1949-1951 tho
The rivets
So you got 12 guns of a canceled project now
*flees*
- lot of German engineers were captured in 1945 and Soviets got advanced knowledge on welding technology
- Sverdlovs were build heavily on welding style
So yeah rivet deal doesn't apply anymore in this time
Last I heard about the K-class the Germans weren't that great at welding.
I will have to check if that range is feasible with Stalingrad’s special shell at that mv and shell weight
And taking into account her max elevation
50°

In today "Cooking with Drachinifel", we will learn about Byzantine barbeque technique and recipes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2KFIZk7wK40
Let Audible help you discover new ways to laugh, be inspired, or be entertained. New members can try Audible free for 30 days. Visit https://audible.com/drachinifel or text drachinifel to 500-500.
Today we take a look at that great mystery of the ancient past, just what was Greek Fire and how was it used?
Sources:
The Alexiad
The Chronicles of...
Welcome back
indeed, been a long while
you're still active here in some capacity earlier this year no?:
Yeah, just had a lot of issues to deal with
This 224mm projectile was designed on March 26, 1931. It is 5 calibers long (i.e. 1,120 mm), with a mass of 142 kg and an explosive content of 9.7 kg. It features 7 driving bands rather than pre-machined grooves in order to minimize barrel wear issues. To ensure proper functioning upon impact, it has two fuzes.
It was fired in 1932, achieving a muzzle velocity of 1,566 mps and reaching a range of 121,600 meters. It wasn't considered entirely successful since some of the driving bands were stripped during firing (around the bourrelet in particular).
I also matched the colors with the period correct color scheme for this type of shell
well, for as much as I could speculate ofc
@unkempt jungle british incendiary balloon article
off to go take part in Australias first naval victory
shame that she and so many others were never preserved
- 25% OFF -
Use code MILAVHIS to receive 25% OFF: https://www.usni.org/press/books
My reading list: https://www.usni.org/press/books?f[0]=subject%3A1959
The Schweinfurt (and Regensburg) raid was a debacle in many ways but it was also inevitable. Since the 1920s, the USAAC/AAF launched itself upon a trajectory that made a mission like this ...
Super Monitor
Armament:
3 x 350 mm rifle in triple turret "E", 30 degree elevation
16 x 57 mm automatic guns in twin turrets.
Protection, Armor:
Conning tower, 400 mm sides, 200 mm roof
350mm turret, 400 mm front, 100 mm sides, 200 mm roof
Barbette armor, 400 mm
Side armor, 400 mm
Armored bulkheads, 400 mm
Machinery spaces, 80 mm sides, 200 mm roof
Weather deck, 50 mm
Main deck, 200 mm
No sad 

I SAID NO SAD
The archer was quite popular, it was more well liked than Challenger or Firefly.
It may not be fast or have a turret, but as a self-propelled AT gun that's pretty irrelevant. See also: the enduringly popular M10... which did have a turret but was basically used as a casemate vehicle.
Help
I'm browsing a forum and I need to search by date.
Their date feature is a month calender and I have to click to browse months.
The post I look for is from 2006.

It's Dutchfleet . nl
I need to enter the secrets of the French language sources.
Oh no, Richie has been GEKOLONISEERED
There's actually two things I want from French language sources.
One was the mention of a Dutch dreadnought, which was probably a mistranslation by someone.
These are just generic Armstrong designs IIRC
The other thing I do want to know more about is good old D'Adda.
I believe he published in ... hm... what was it called again
want me to find that?
The magazine in general might be of interest to us all.
Oh yeah
a monitor
Hr Ms Schorpioen was based on a French blueprint 
Her Sister is in Den Helder right now
And you can visit her
We desecrated her though.
Installed a single Krupp gun in her turret 
ohnoe

anyways I also drew the alternative possible shell color scheme
since it is an experimental shell
elp, need to find this photo's source
good luck
What the fuck
?
I mean, if you know anything about Dutch gun manufacturing industries you'd be surprised about it too.
good
to note, the guy isn't even certain to be a Roman emperor, we only know for sure that he exists and operated around Dacia between 240 and 275
he's just as likely to just be a local commander who got cut off from the rest of the empire and tried to kickstart an operation before someone or something stopped it
@tough quail
name me a historical admiral of WWII that you don't want to fight against in all situations
aka if you see him any of the ships, you would surrender or defect to him
Raymond Spruance
if I had to surrender
definitely to an allied admiral
aint got no time for getting decapitated on a japanese cruiser or being sent to germany hell nah
also miss me with the soviets
I'd be terrified of fighting against yamaguchi
because it means i'm fighting the ijn pre-midway
and those usually don't end well for the allies
i wouldn't be lining up to surrender to him tho
for me it'd be a tie between Chink Lee, Cunningham, or Nagumo Chuichi.
im having a real brain fart right now who is Chink Lee?
Willis Augustus Lee.
yup. big brain fart still dont know who it is
imma search him up
for Nagumo, that means I'm gonna face the full might of the Kido Butai, and that is not a good thing
Its Ching Lee
just found him
Didn’t he live past midway
Are you referring to yamaguchi
nein
yep, only as far as Saipan tho
I find it weird that his Meowfficer is only purple but Yamaguchi is gold 
(in case you're wondering, it's Jiroumaru)
Surrender without fighting: You're not courageous enough, therefore you should die
Surrender after a bloody fight:
You have harmed too many Japanese people, therefore you should die
Infallible logic.
Dishonoru
You'll regain your honour by getting decapitated by a proper soldier
Be thankful
If there's a big red cross on the uniform, that means aim here
Or force them to run across a minefield
Or rape them
Fuck the Japanese empire.
Why not both?
no wonder modern Japan gets depressed rather ez
Line up the civilians on the quarterdeck one by one, execute them, throw them overboard, let the spray wash off the blood
And yeet the children overboard, not worth the bullet
Execute them, waste of bullets
Throw them right into a submarine's spinning propellers and let it do its job
I guess that was I-8?
You know, for being such an honorable warrior culture, many IJN and IJA choose the pussy way out by offing themselves.
rule 1 of WW2
do not surrender to the axis
they will kill you
Or they still have shoe leather around
and or torture you

At least the German will feed you if for only to work you to death.
What if they have a hot anime version tho
Not sure about the Italian though
In the German case it'd depend on who you are, and when you surrender
Soviet or Jew or some other deemed-worthless group? To the camp you go
until they find out your uncle twice removed had a jewish wife
Yeap
Technically shot and beaten through a gauntlet before, but the main thing is to throw them through the prop blades for instant meat paste
I know they treated the western allies a lot better but
still
eugh
I-8's history is just nearly full war crime
labour camps aren't fun in any case
yea, not nice
but if you get sunk and picked up by a German ship you don't have to expect getting decapitated
which is a low bar to meet
but it's met
sure
that's one thing
Ah, iirc the I-8 captain during the incident kill himself right after japan surrender. Should have hunt down every sailor who involved
Hulk Hogan?
You cannot say they all get raped and murdered on day one
Good meme, look at how much of a shit show Class A criminals are
That’s not interesting enough
To the point that it becomes modern politics
Ah, MacArthur
I blame MacArthur for that shitshow
And, more relevantly, how AL's VA got yeeted
They should’ve just executed the Japanese scientists right after they got what they wanted anyways
also wouldn't want to get captured during the seven years war on north america by either side
especially france
since the indians were scalping
a lot
and france had a ton of indian allies
He right there on top of the list of cuntish Generals I dislike
They fully deserve to be fucked out of their “”promise””
Another McCunter appreciator, nice
France should have sent more colonist, England at least sent their undesirable
Hopefully they won’t
France had a religious dilemma when it came to settlement
france did the right thing by not waging all out economic war in the americas
we needed money to beat prussia on the continent
Britain’s fucky wucky religious situation encouraged a lot of settlers
(europe)
France set up catholic settlements but Catholics were already happy in France
So why go to America
And Protestants certainly didn’t wanna go to a Catholic settlement
and we were doing quite well until russia switched sides to Prussia because Peter III was a prussophile

Remind me again why did the Brit involve themselves with a Prussian king?
the 1750's make me puke
the british house
was house hannover
It’s the British
The British also love to ally with one part of Europe to fuck over another part
so it was an obvious alliance
They do that quite a bit
france allied spain but spain literally failed to conquer portugal (which was england's ally)

and austria was being austria
If it mean no one dominate Europe and challenge their navy then I guess the Brit will ally with anyone
🇦🇹
britain bankrupted themselves
and made everyone their enemy
which france gladly used to fuck with them
helping out the 13 colonies
Ah, politic. It all boil down to fucking up the other nation shit.
in any case
prussia was allowed to live and was eventually the dominant german culture (austria lost)
which is fine honestly
Prussia didn't become cringe until 1848
ask sirene
he'll know
Curious, why no meme about Austria military incompetence?
Because Eugen is based
because austria wasn't denmark, france, belgium, norway or the netherlands in WW2

they just anshlussed and provided 2/3 of the SS's officer corps

So the French technically got beaten by the Austrian?
?
It was a poor jab
ironic because the french army was the one that retook most of austria with a bunch of americans too
eh it's fine
it's not on the "they just surrendered" level at least
Didn’t we start this about which WW2 admiral we don’t want to face in battle?
yeah
To me it will either Ching Lee or Halsey
which is an irrelevant question because not every admiral fights in the same way they did IRL if put in a different situation
Lee bc he is so good at gunnery and using his BB, Halsey bc he is a bull that defy normal thinking
Tbf, Halsey operate more on a strategic level while Lee very much a battle admiral
puts Kohlauf onto the table

Halsey is fine, tho my only main is his Bull's Run.
Lee and Spruance missed the OP to massacre Yamato early 
All's good and dandy until the world wonders which typhoon he led the fleet into
be careful where you put that Schwerpunkt
(pun intended)

Horse here has a massive issue with Spence getting sunk in Cobra under Halsey's command
And, slightly off tangent, forgot which French commander was literally tossing shit at Bucentaure, screaming epithets and all kinds of foul language at Admiral Villeneuve over his incompetence before Trafalgar
Had to be physically restrained
Demasting is the least of Bucentaure's issues at Trafalgar
not being able to move sounds pretty bad
Curious, have you play Ultimate Admiral: age of sail?
... I don't think that compares well to having your entire stern getting raked by a double loaded broadside from Victory in her opening salvo.
raking is pretty horrific
Haven't, sadly.
did they ever try to put a wooden bulkhead in the cross section behind the stern gallery to prevent raking?
I don’t think they did, I only know of some experiment in rounding the stern to angle it in case of raking shot
I mean, some captain may have tested using the bulkhead option but not sure about their effectiveness.

Thats precisely what you dont want
too heavy ig
you can stop cannonballs if it's thick enough
Bulkheads separating the cabins are unhinged and stowed away upon beat to quarters
Yea, but spalling
More splinters
then just put a thin wooden bulkhead behind it
wooden splinters don't pierce that
but we have hindsight ofc
mostly the issue ye
Yeah, not so sure about multiple bulkhead
they definitely added them to modern ships
i can only imagine the destruction of a BB caliber shell raking the stern of a DD
Well, modern ship can afford extra weight bc they use their own propulsion, not rely on the wind
no need to explain



















