#history
1 messages · Page 18 of 1
That means. Becoming US citizen only by abandoning your citizenship of other nation
Even then. They could be more biased for US born citizens
Me to Incomparable: "You are packing some pretty heavy artillery for your size boy. I am surprised you can even put two words together."
does anyone have some book recs on Italian ships?
@ivory ridge here's your man
About the ships or the whole navy
or like the whole med theatre
also i need to check if more stuff was localized in english
preferably the ships specifically
oh I'm italian you don't need to worry about that lol
even better
so first of all, the bible for the Littorio class
"The Littorio Class: Italy's Last and Largest Battleships 1937-1948"-Erminio Bagnasco, Augusto De Toro
then a similar book about the Cavours and Duilios
"ITALIAN BATTLESHIPS: CONTE DI CAVOUR AND DUILIO CLASSES 1911-1956" again, Bagnasco and De Toro
then there is a collection of magazines sold in newsstands called "Storia Militare Briefing", with multiple releases which you can either find on their website or in other online book shops
STORIA Militare BRIEFING n° 9 CACCIATORPEDINIERE CLASSE “NAVIGATORI”
STORIA Militare BRIEFING n° 12 INCROCIATORI PESANTI CLASSE “ZARA”
STORIA Militare BRIEFING n° 24 INCROCIATORI PESANTI TRENTO, TRIESTE e BOLZANO
STORIA Militare BRIEFING n° 27 CACCIATORPEDINIERE CLASSE “SOLDATI”
STORIA Militare BRIEIFING n°33 INCROCIATORI LEGGERI CLASSE “CAPITANI ROMANI”
iirc , they are currently working on a book that takes the Zara and Trento ones to make a single volume, also localized in english
thank you very much
do you happen to know of anything else on the capitani romani specifically?
"Italian Heavy Cruisers: From Trento to Bolzano" - Brescia, De Toro
apparently it either came out recently or it's about to
Specifically i dont think so, there isnt too much to say about them so even just the less than 100 books magazine says nearly everything
there is a section about them in the book about ALL italian cruisers but uhh
it's like 10 or so pages in a 600 pages hardcover book
oh lmao
tho the Capitani Romani magazine made us discover this thing which is just 👌
Just to clarify for those wondering what exactly in the hell they're looking at;
Though for pretty much the entirety of the design phase of the Capitani Romani, the RM was intended to use eight guns in four twin turrets, it seems that at one point in the late 1930s, being quite pleased with the design of the 135mm triple turrets to be used on the rebuilt Duilio-class, they decided to investigate alternative gun layouts for the ships.
Solution A is the one pictured above, which consisted of two 135mm triple turrets, and four 135mm singles - two superfiring over each triple, and two positioned amidships as wing turrets. Welcome back to 1908! Compared to the base design, this would have allowed for nine guns to bear 60° fore and aft of either beam, versus eight. 10° off the bow or stern would allow for the same four guns as with the base design, but between 10° and 30°, five guns could bear, rather than four. Solution B, for which no plan is provided in the monograph, was a much more conventional 3x3 layout, with two turrets forward and one aft. This once again allowed for all guns to bear in the same +/-60° arc off either beam, while the 30° arcs off the bow would see six guns (versus four in the base design), and the equivalent arcs off the stern would see three guns (versus four in the base design).Neither alternative solution was opted for, likely due to the desire to avoid any additional delays in the procurement of the ships - these were general plans for the arrangement, not complete designs, and such redesigns would have taken valuable time. It also has to be said, Solution A was very, very dubious, given the use of open-back single mounts, and Solution B, while very attractive, would have required the most extensive re-design, and allowed for a less even distribution of firepower - which was probably not ideal in a scout ship that may very well have to disengage rapidly from superior enemy forces once they were located.
that's some spicy shit
alright I think I'll make some more use of my culture bonus down the road and buy some of those recs, thank you again
If you ever want recommendations for less specific stuff just ask, i have a bunch of that as well
Why larger tanks always sexier
It's a shame i wasnt into this stuff back when i got my culture bonus years ago, i spent half of it on mangas, a quarter on warcraft books and a fifth on books for the uni entrance exam

Jesus christ it's been nearly 5 years 
looks at bookshelf
I don't have a problem I don't have a problem I don't have a problem
oh I mean don't get me wrong most of the bonus I've spent so far has been on manga and CDs lmao
God i will never find those books at decent prices 
thousand yard stare
I won't pretend that Le Torpediniere Italiane was at all reasonably costed when I bought it
But I also don't want to remember the exact price
some of this stuff looks very interesting, I'll take a better look tomorrow
I just wish that we'd get more books published now that go over the older stuff, in more detail.
Also can i just say how annoying it is that some of them are white author name at the top and red book name in the middle while others are rhe opposite
FWIW, the only ones I have where that's the case is the two-part SM 'Dossier' in the Cavour/Duilio-classes
Idk if that was intentional or someone just had too much grappa and got the order mixed up when they sent it to the publishers
god that is infuriating
regarding the KF51 apparently its gonna have a 20 round ready rack, guessing its going to be another leopard hull suicide rack situation since its still the Leo 2 chassis
tho makes me wonder where the 4th crewmen is being squeezed in there
so he's going in place of the suicide rack
guessing meaning there's hull ammo storage else where
or this thing is only running 20 rounds and 4 loitering munitions
20 ready rack? Sounds sus
I mean the bustle rack does seem a lot bigger than the leo 2s
tho I question the point in the 130 MM with only 20 rounds of ready ammo
it seems like the 120 would give you far more ammo while only being slightly worse performance wise
your also throwing 4 loitering munitions on the thing meaning you can likely just smack whatever the 120 MM can't kill with that
Rheinmetalls claiming 20 round storage rack, so yeah bigger than the standard leo
tho as I said I'm still wondering what its hull storage situation is going to be like
yeah
How curious indeed
Slightly?
Didn't they said like %50 better pen
according to the company, the increase of 8% in calibre resulting in 50% more kinetic energy over the 120 mm gun
Nvm it was energy
eh even then I'm not convinced for the need of a newly fielded higher caliber gun
none of the next gen armor threats have materialized
while obviously I think we should be developing such systems for a just in case scenario
I don't see the use for current requirements

I know that arrangement looks hideous Richy, but tbf you French have the Colbert
Surprisingly tanky if paired with sun yat sen
Who is now a tier 9 bb
With 6 18 inch guns
Literally sovetskaya Georgia sold to China
20 rounds without the missiles
It's 2x 10 round drums
Drones/missiles would take the place of one drum
RhM is just listing the maximums via "up to X" claims
And not telling the whole story
Oh ye speaking of which
Silver any blueprints for this abomination as well?

Literally a Soyuz that got georgia’d
Unfortunately Al convinced them to do a chinese pr bait
Then again, considering the factions involved, they might not even be pr and just appear in the story through sheer force
Im sick of this rock
Then again we already have yat sen
And it’s the same faction
not as easy to cram in as st. louis vs saint louis
Early Soyuz plans was a choice between 12 356mm, 9 406mm, 6 457mm. Soviets choose the 9 406mm.
This one seems what if alternative choice
Yt. Sen
she's gonna be shit in wows though
georgia but without most of the things that makes her good
i just want to stop wasting pr slots on factions that shouldnt have them
Bro I don't want to see this thing 
What’s that? 3 German prs?
the name 'brest' itself is literally c**mer bait
and then you shit on brest's stats
This isn't even Iowa hull anymore
It is
Qwerty tf you talking about
That bow is x2 size of Iowa
As I said in another chat these poor ships activate every maternal instinct in my body

qwerty is here to act like he knows anything about how the game works
You have no idea what you are talking about qwerty
They might be cursed ships with deformities, but they are still part of the eagle union and will be cared for as such
Now stay strong for mother
Social equity

like especially, compare brest to ply
No
Tier 9 vs 10 bruh
Kronshtadt v2
Who asked
Idc
She’s my bb anyways
it's also doubling down on how goofy it is to make her american when she was purely for soviet use too
I'm super hyped for Yat Sen. Soyuz sister in Chinese clothing 
Well Al made Milwaukee soviet
‘We will trade you a cl for a cv’
‘Cool, deal”
The cv:

At least we have another rs now, it’s still bad, but when it was the only representative of the entire class that was pretty oof
But
It is what it is
Soyuz one is Sun Yat-Sen
Not like RN needs it
yeah they literally just need to use the full name
Qwerty underestimates the wank
did you see them getting in pr5
Like Harbin?
Yes they had their pr now
most PR rosters after 2 have been like
No need for another
a flashbang to my brain
Rich IB will take a slot instead then stahp
First faction to get ships dead before ww2 time period, first faction to get ships past ww2 time period, already got a pr based off fake borrowing, you better believe they will get a tier 9 borrowed pr bb
Wish I was a white swan with Soyuz
Humans study shells, birds sometimes get hit by them
Goes broke in day 1
Waited 5 damn years for it ye
all this in the same year lmao
im not saying it was bad
it was just fucking weird
of course, ectl will say she's Tex
but like
why would i use her over agir
or kronk
Tfw Yat Sen would bring first Soviet UR gun in game but it would be Dragon Empery category like Harbin's 130mms
when i have both maxed already
waste of time really unless FS5 completely saves her (and fixes her ass gun problem)
hIsToRiCaL rEfErEnCe ok should nelson have secondaries shooting only backwards
Yes
She’s a french boat
The faction isn’t meta nor does it have a lot if ships
Feel free to use
Or piss off

The Nelson’s are already so trash it wouldn’t matter, but at least it would be funny
look all i'm saying is, if you want me to spend months grinding your new DR boat
at least make her better than the one i got in gacha 5 months ago
or the one last year
I know
I’ll enjoy Brest for the both of us ok
better than azuma, at least
How about we avoid power creep
i mean
the fact she has the reputation (apparently) of being bad is a good thing
she'll just get a fatesim that agir wont
ok, maybe i misworded myself
she's better than most ships
free buffs for shits and giggles
but for a DR 
agir broke CB balancing and it
no kron is better than brest most of the time
Not to someone like me that uses richie all the time
you can batter through literally everything without trying

you're literally handwringing over either a few seconds faster clears or slightly more health left over
you do you
it doesn't matter
Brest was smth i didnt ask for anyways
I accept her existence and welcome her as my beloved
the thing im more amgy about is representation
ply gets like a shit ton of them
you designed these two ships to be with each other
they're literally city sisters

it's not even like ply's tits are that much bigger
Are you done
no
Is that all it takes to be strong in Al?
I underestimate my power
I pinged silver over an hour ago, you guys think he's busy doing other stuff or busying frothing at the mouth at what pics i sent him
🤨
The man is a teacher and he's at work you spastic
It's 12pm in HK
South Dakota machinery against Japanese 36cm/45 APC Type 91 (aka WWII Kongō/Fusō/Ise gun)
Flat broadside-on, Kongō can achieve effective (fit to burst) penetrations of SoDak's citadel at 10k yards, ineffective penetrations at 12k yards, partial penetrations at 13k yards.
10 def off broadside (80 deg target angle) this drops to effective at 9k yards, ineffective at 12k yards, and partial at 12k yards.
20 def off broadside (70 deg target angle) this drops to effective at 6k yards, ineffective at 10k yards, and partial at 10k yards.
30 deg off broadside (60 deg target angle) this drops to effective at 0 yards (aka never), ineffective at 2k yards, and partial at 3k yards.
40 deg off broadside (50 deg target angle) nothing makes a hole, even at the muzzle.
Deck pen is possible at 34k yards and beyond.
How advisable is tactically flooding yourself to prevent deck pens with a list
Flooding to intentionally create a list during combat almost always sounds like a bad idea

Breh
laughs nervously
Had to get 3 massive wall shelves to contain the moonrunes and other english publications
The real payload is someone's online library though 👌
torpedo cutouts
Instant ban
Fwiw its on the weather deck I guess
That normalizes the angle of and increases the amount of surface area presented by your belt
So
Not at all
Clone her and make her wear Soyuz clothes
Literally copy and paste
Also, splendid, fake Soyuz
Take Soyuz head off and replace it with Yat Sen head
Lists also make shooting more difficult
Since you have to deal with trunnion tilt
When your ship is listing, your barbette is no longer level with the ocean surface
So when you want to aim at a ship 45 deg off the port bow and shoot with a 15 deg elevation, but you have a 5 deg list to starboard, you now have a more complex issue of adding angles together as your ship rolls
Skill issue
list compensation is fairly trivial
the training motor on the other hand might have different opinion
When you’re accidentally right but your reasoning for getting there needs some help
You see if you make both out of wood…
I was kinda making that post as a meme since yknow Texas flooded herself for gunnery elevation, why not for increasing deck thickness
Appreciate the thoughtful answers though
Where can I buy the substance developers of this thing used?
Oh yay.......Louisana......
imagine the conversation the engineers would've had behind closed doors
Love how they offered this to Soviets
When they were just wanting a normal BB
"wait why a carrier battleship?"
"dude they've hardly got much shipbuilding capability, it'll be funny as shit"
But US was going to build it
"US casually building their heaviest BB in existence for Soviets"
really hated bath iron works or whoever would have been contracted
Holy fuck the ADEN on a tank
how'd they manage getting the acronym to spell Venom
I thought this was some wacky 60s shit
Not modern

Military acronym creators are very proud of their jobs
i mean stuff like TUSK and HARM are pretty self explanatory
wait is it even an acronym
I'm not seeing a breakdown anywhere
and acronym creators always include a breakdown to show it off
Military acronym creators are like the coolest people
I kinda believe it
F-22 has more expensive RAM and ain't for export. There gotta be a reason US didn't do that
Tho F-35 is smaller which helps stealth so
F-35's on the export market because other countries like the UK, Canada, Italy, etc. all provided funding for the program
BOHICA's another one I keep hearing
incidentally M230 uses the same ammo as ADEN
which... makes that thing a bit redundant unless you're somehow so hard on the shitlist you won't even be sold a chaingun from the 80s

it's a chonker
The problem is that the Gibbs and Cox series came from Gibbs himself, a man who wanted nothing but perfection in his designs.
The Soviets called for a 35k ton design, Gibbs basically ignored it and designed what he himself wanted
In other words, the very foundation of this subline implies either the entire someone in or the entire BuShips ignores the pleas of BuAer, BuOrd, or whatever requirements listed out by the US Navy, inhales gibbium, and shits these impractical turds out
Gibbs is also the person who designed a DD with zero DP armament when the requirements were exactly that, so he's a pretty... amazing person.
where we're going we don't need logic
To be fair though, the soviet instructions were vague.
They wanted a "large ship with unique characteristics", so Design B does fit that aspect, I guess.
well it is large and unique
Yes, but also likely out of reach of Soviet Infrastructure.
Also, to this question, really simple answer.
Just ask WG to rename.
Not like they havent done it before for Pommern/Ludendorff.
I always felt Soviets wanted a US BB to reverse engineer purposes
Fix your steel production issues first.

And putting 70k on a shaft as well.
Chapayev: I have 62k

Also the reason Project 24 has 4 shafts
And Stalingrad
The both share same engines
Sanrui boogaloo
What is the armor
100mm belt angled at 20°
Material?
legos
Technically the armor question depends on which design you're looking at
the belt differs yes
100mm at 20° of 80 kg homogenous steel is true for the C5 designs, but for the later 'Saint Louis' nothing was settled yet
SL ver.4 belt has me down bad
It is quite possible (probable, even) that it was thicker than what was envisioned for the C5's
likely, given the displacement envisioned
but we really don't have a lot of info on her
Indeed
Homogeneous armor probably isn't the best for inclined belts, as opposed to facehardened
At 18k yards with the German 38cm, a KC type belt has a 23% effective thickness improvement against complete penetrations with a 15 deg incline for a 10% weight gain (from needing a longer height to cover an equivalent hitting space), a net efficiency gain of about 13%. However, a homogeneous belt would only act about 11% thicker under equivalent range and incline conditions, for a net efficiency gain of only 1%.
are you considering scaling effects with the 38cm shell here tho
This is chart is only accurate for a very precise set of conditions--don't go applying it exactly to shorter ranges, higher velocities, etc.--but it gives an idea of how homogeneous armor only really picks up in performance at higher obliquities, and thus inclining a homogeneous belt vs. just using a thicker vertical homogeneous belt of equivalent coverage is often not very effective
I’m not comparing inclined homogeneous vs. inclined facehardened
I’m comparing inclined homogenous vs. vertical homogeneous
(the sharp drop in the graph occurs due to cap edge effects)
does the SHS actually get the cap edge bonus
does richie's original APC get the edge bonus?
The -12% NBL bonus should be fixed, just the plate thickness needed to get it at a given obliquity as the cap edge angle changes. Note that several cap types, British post-1930 Hadfield (but for not earlier post-Jutland Hadfield APC shells that had caps much like US Navy WWII caps, and also not any post-Jutland Firth APC shells whose caps look like the German L/4.4 caps even in 1918) and, for the most part, any French Navy AP caps, for example, have "helmet" contoured caps with essentially no corner of significance between the skirt and the face edge, so they never get any notch bonus. This means that some British post-Jutland through the end of WWII APC shells get the over-45-degree -12% bonus when the angle and plate thickness combination allows it, but not others, simply due to the manufacturers using very different AP caps on the same shell type made by more than one company. Again, luck of the draw when going to the ammo depot.
Smoof
smooth, no wrinkles, smart
more aerodynamic, smooth
it has the same edge
but further up the tip
but no bonus

there's like a 5° difference
Eh, looks fairly smooth

it is there nonetheless
if anything french and US caps are a lot more similar than Italian anf German ones
yeah I mean
that cap does work
but was it in use during ww2?
I'm pretty sure the USN used that cap on the 14" shells much more frequently
I mean I'm pretty sure the french shell doesn't get the bonus because the angle is too high up and just not sharp enough
14 inch my beloved

ok now leave me alone in my sadness

no
this is why no
Seeing about 148 deg here
he just picked it because 180°-45° = 135°
so smaller angles "dig in" and larger don't
and applying it as a discrete modifier also is likely a simplification
How does cap shape affect this? Since the German simulation and the US Army/Navy caps gave virtually identical results, even though the German cap edge is closer to 95-100 degrees and the circa-140 degrees US cap edge corner was a much wider angle, I would venture to say the following:
(1) A corner width over 140 degrees probably leaves no deep-enough crease at any angle to work. Wider opening angles at the edge of the cap face, such as with most French AP caps of British Hadfield WWII AP caps, never have a cap edge effect. (This may be wrong, but not by much, since that corner is getting very shallow at 140 degrees opening angle.)
(2) The 12% drop in NBL when the crease is cut is a constant for any corner angle of a hardened AP cap.
(3) The crease effect only happens at over 45 degrees impact obliquity from right-angles. The US caps both had no crease effect under 50 degrees and only at that steep angle when the plate was rather thick and rigid so that the dent formed was minimal and the corner cutting effect won.
(4) As the angle of obliquity goes up toward 90 degrees (parallel to the plate face), the thickness needed to allow a notch/crease in the plate to get the drop in NBL goes down. (There is a table in HCWCALC for the US caps with 140 degrees opening angle at the face corner.)
He chose it because it worked for US 140-deg caps but not caps with bigger angles
it's his right to do it that way
as long as he has the ballistic tests to back it up
He says he’s working on version 7.0 of HCWCALC that will incorporate more fixes for cap weights and effects
So here’s hoping

I've always had my doubts on performance of shells at over 45° obliquity so I'm glad he's adressing it
Well such tests were common against homogeneous armor; every US AP shell lot from 6” to 12” was tested at 50 deg
no surprise for the USN
Likewise thinner Class B plates were tested up to 70 deg
Class B up to 7.5” was tested against 8” AP at 60 deg
Thick class B only up to 40 deg however
Uptake gratings (Class B) were tested up to 70 deg with 6” shells and 65 deg with 16” shells, interestingly enough
was it tested with the holes drilled in
Yes

if it hits you gotta make sure it parties
14” was tested against uptake gratings at 70 deg, interestingly enough
I wonder
what was the result of the tests
Sorry, not “tests” in the experimental sense
As in, every batch of plates has to pass these requirements
These are acceptance tests
Probably but they aren’t uploaded to Navweaps
big sadness
http://www.navweaps.com/index_nathan/bhnFormulaVsNBLResults.php
Oh here’s a bunch of Class B tests
Compared to HCWCALC 1.0
64.6 deg seems to be the highest obliquity on this table
At the moment I am not attempting to adjust for projectile nose shape under the AP cap. The blunt US AP shells have a small loss in penetration ability at low obliquity (under 30 degrees) compared to the standard US Army WWII 3" M79 AP Shot baseline projectile, but get noticeably better than that - that is, a lower NBL - as obliquity goes up above 30 degrees, being best at 50-60 degrees and then gradually going back up toward the standard NBL for the M79 nose shape, reaching it at 80 degrees, because the shells are all hitting first on their lower noses at such high obliquity and by the time the long slot being torn in the plate has opened up so that the nose tip can be pushed into the plate, the details of tip shape are not as important.
These two shell tests are against the same plate, with/without the Cap Edge Effect being applied in the British shell case (it always is in my computations with US AP shells), where the cap at obliquities above 50 degrees or so digs a transverse notch into the plate on initial impact and makes splitting open the slot being formed in the plate easier, in the US case by -12% to the NBL (from extensive tests with the US Navy 6" Mk 35 MOD 5 AP shell, using an AP cap with a hardness and face very similar to the larger US Navy AP shells). The Hadfield AP cap is contoured to the shape of the nose much more than the US cap, so the corner where the face of the cap meets the side skirt upper edge is not as sharp as with the US Navy standard AP cap design - US cap face is a 100-degree-wide cone with a rounded tip or a flat-faced plateau covering the tip (called a "meplat" after the French term). In these tests the British projectiles ricocheted with only a 4"-deep gouge (no through opening) and broke up, indicating that they were not making any kind of noticeable notch in the plate at the indicated striking velocity, so this effect is either not happening at all or is much weaker. Note, however, that these British projectiles are much softer in their middle and lower bodies than the US AP shells, so they tend to bend when put under high stress, especially sideways stress, as here. Thus, the AP cap shape may not be the cause of this difference between US and British AP shells.

what about the hardness of the british AP cap
compared to that of the US AP cap at the same location
hang on
I knew I had one
627 vs ~555
given, this is just a random british AP cap
no real date on it
I will follow his findings closely in any case
high obliquity still fucky
especially for thinner walled shells
Most non-USN shells should have a cap hardness that peaks above 600 BHN in this era
Tho for Japan it's like 601 or something
800
the issue with that AP cap is the sheer lack of material above the tip of the shell
same with the british one tbh

mfw the magnesium capped shell strikes the optic port
magnesium in saltwater environment 
Its a tank shell choom
I am pleasantly enthralled with the history of "Big J". One of my favorite battleships of all time, most definitely in my top 3.
USS New Jersey aquired the nickname "The Black Dragon" in WWII due to being painted a dark blue which made it very difficult to see in the dark. USS New Jersey participated in nearly all of the Western Pacific campaigns from her arrival in the theater in January 1944 until the end of WW II. Her first combat action came as a unit of the Fifth Fleet in assaults on the Marshall Islands. Next was the invasion of the Marianas where her heavy guns battered Saipan and Tinian. She screened carriers as American and Japanese pilots dueled in the Battle of the Philippine Sea, and then contributed to strikes on Guam and the Palaus. In late 1944, she was a unit of fast carrier task forces ranging the waters off the Philippines, Okinawa and Formosa. She shot down planes in the Philippines campaigns and continued to protect the carriers. New Jersey was directly engaged in the conquest of Okinawa in early 1945. She fought off air raids, rescued downed pilots, defended the carriers from suicide planes and shot them down. She provided heavy bombardment, preparing the invasion beaches for the assault. Following flagship assignments in Japanese waters in late 1945, she took aboard nearly a thousand homeward-bound troops for return to the U.S.
In 1946, The "Big J" returned to the Atlantic, making midshipman cruises to Northern European waters and operating in the western Atlantic. She was decommissioned at Bayonne, N. J. on 30 June 1948. With the outbreak of hostilities in Korea, she was recommissioned on 21 November 1950. During her two tours of duty in Korean waters, she operated in direct support of United Nations troops, interdicted Communist supply and communication routes, and destroyed supplies and troop positions. During her first shore bombardment mission at Wonsan, she received her only combat casualties of the Korean War. One of her men was killed and two severely wounded by shore battery fire. New Jersey made deployments to Northern Europe and the Mediterranean between 1955 and her decommissioning at Bayonne on 21 August 1957. Her third career began on 6 April 1968 when she was recommissioned in Philadelphia. Operating from her new homeport of Long Beach, California, she arrived off the coast of Vietnam in late 1968. For the next six months she fired against Communist targets, destroying gun positions and supply areas. New Jersey was decommissioned for the third time at the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard on 17 December 1969. New Jersey returned to the active fleet for the final time on 28 December 1982. After mounting a show of strength off troubled El Salvador, she rushed to the Mediterranean in the fall of 1983 to provide fire support for Marines in Beirut, Lebanon. For the next seven years she served in a variety of roles, including regular deployments to the Western Pacific. She was decommissioned for the final time on 9 September 1991.
Indeed, Big Jeffe had quite the explosive end to her career
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_battleship_Jaime_I
Jaime I was a Spanish dreadnought battleship, the third and final member of the España class, which included two other ships: España and Alfonso XIII. Named after King James I of Aragon, Jaime I was built in the early 1910s, though her completion was delayed until 1921 owing to a shortage of materials that resulted from the start of World War I ...
Jean Bart was a French fast battleship, the second and final member of the Richelieu class. Built as a response to the Italian Littorio class, the Richelieus were based on their immediate predecessors of the Dunkerque class with the same unconventional arrangement that grouped their main battery forward in two quadruple gun turrets. They were sc...
A pleasant read. Much appreciated.
Justice was a pre-dreadnought battleship built for the French Navy in the mid-1900s. She was the second member of the Liberté class, which included three other vessels and was a derivative of the preceding République class, with the primary difference being the inclusion of a heavier secondary battery. Justice carried a main battery of four 305 ...
What are the other two?
What's the most perverted warship name
HMS Sappho maybe
HMCS Wetaskiwin had "Wet Ass Queen" but that's a nametag sadly
USS Hoe
Not exactly lewd
But we had a Brig during the War of Independence that was named
"Palhaço"
Which means
"Clown"
We've an Island named
"Island of Hoes" 
Those days ago i discovered that those ships had the nickname of
"Fumando espero"
During WWII
Which translates to "Smoking i wait"
This was given due to the fact they produced a lot of smoke since they were coal fired
Which meant they were "Smoking while waiting to be torpedoed"
Any Musashi fans in chat?
She took a big L
Oh
How i wish we had one of those
I mean, an expedition to find a sunken ship
It would be quite nice.
In this case
Cruiser Bahia
Although she was sunk at around 4000 metres
Maybe i could shut up some conspiracy theorists who say she was torpedoed
I saw a lad in al-chat fawning over the amalgamation of Shinano in Azur Lane. I do not think he knows that the Aircraft Carrier, Shinano was sunk by the USS Archerfish. This is what remains:
No, most people know
I find the wrecks of ships in particular to be eerie.
Especially with archerfish having bits of shinanos rigging
I know that Vital de Oliveira was found when a fishing net went stuck on one of her cannons
The sheer size of these ships in the vast depths of the ocean are most definitely deserving of a horror movie.
I found this to be a rather pleasant read: https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/see-aircraft-carrier-it-died-horrible-death-one-important-reason-92301
it shits unnecessarily on japan for keeping their pilots in the front
the US could afford to rotate because they were large enough to support this cycle in terms of manpower
japan was not
japan also doesn't really have the luxury of time, they wanted to force a decisive victory over the US quickly almost constantly and force a peace deal,
and to maximize the chance of that you want as many of your best pilots at the front
National Interest
Oh I didn't see that Undie beat me to it XD
Granted, this is actually a better quality article than you usually get from them
Japan did not have the resources to last during the war. It explains why their strategy changed from "decisive" and "calculated" to "rushed" and "sporadic". The first years of the war brought Japan great success. In the Philippines, Japanese troops occupied Manila in January 1942, although Corregidor held out until May; Singapore fell in February, and the Dutch East Indies and Rangoon (Burma) in early March. The Allies had difficulty maintaining communications with Australia, and British naval losses promised the Japanese navy further freedom of action. Tōjō grew in confidence and popularity and began to style himself somewhat in the manner of a fascist leader. But the U.S. Navy had not been permanently driven from the South Pacific. The Battle of Midway in June 1942 cost the Japanese fleet four aircraft carriers and many seasoned pilots, and the battle for Guadalcanal Island in the Solomons ended with Japanese withdrawal in February 1943. A truly unfortunate fate for a nation with a staggering amount of military promise. However, for what the consequences of Pacific Imperialism had done to the world, you may say it was "Well Deserved."
Still would avoid TNI like the plague, though
japanese imperialism, its conflict with the US, and its collapse was an inevitability
imo
Indubitably. (Unironic use of the word).
Ah geez, another Kyle Mizokami article 
It's mostly okay at least, but the final few paragraphs are off
Notably, there was another support carrier built, and before Shinano

HMS Unicorn
She's considered a CVL in airgroup capacity but she's the displacement of a Yorktown class
She effectively acts as a mobile airbase, complete with repair facilities, in part due to interwar British procurement politics
The RAF and RN competed for control over the airwings of the carriers
Unicorn was a product of this, as she effectively had to act as an airbase at sea if an RAF airfield wasn't available
Shinano as a ship is similar to an upscaled Unicorn, but with a slightly different doctrine. Rather than a logistical and basing role, Shinano was also planned for a combat role, positioned with Taihō and other (planned) armored carriers closer to the enemy than the cheaper, unarmored and mass-produced Unryūs, which would have a greater aircraft carrying efficiency per ton since they would be largely unarmored
Thus the armored carriers would absorb US air attacks, and damaged Japanese aircraft could land on Shinano to be repaired rather than having to struggle on back to their home carriers further away
The US, of course, never gave Japan the time it needed to implement such a scheme, and the effective destruction of the IJNAF at the Battle of the Philippine Sea ended the combat utility of the carrier arm for the rest of the war
This was a foreseeable issue—after all, the USN had noticed from interwar fleet exercises that attrition amongst Navy pilots and airframes would be high, and they thus implemented a robust system to train new pilots. Both the RN and IJN failed to do so, though admittedly the RN was also under more political constraints.
Japan could have implemented such a system before the war, but was overly confident in their pilot quality over quantity to an excessive degree
Surely the air war in China could have clued them in—but the Army did more of the heavy lifting, and the Navy found excuses when they did suffer losses
So by the time war began, it was too late
This still does not excuse the Japanese decision to repeatedly commit their carrier air groups to land bases in the South Pacific, however, where the daily churn of bombing raids and duels with USAAF pilots wore down their numbers and fighting edge to the point where even a year and a half of recovery time between Santa Cruz and Philippine Sea was insufficient to replenish their carrier air groups in quality and quantity
Even under the Japanese concept of Kantai Kessen this was a frivolous waste of a valuable and, ultimately, irreplaceable resource in a non-decisive sector against forces that did not constitute the enemy's center of gravity
Imagine believing the Merkava is real. Smh.
This is whats inside of the rear
In a Merkava
Worse... your removing almost all the ammunition
Not suprised, Simple History screw up the M4 Sherman before the_Chieftain call them out.
Does Namer count as a Merkava ))))))
kharkovite nightmares beyond our comprehension
to be fair i cant blame them
there has to be some saving grace to why the merkava is as stupid and bad as it is
unfortunately there really isn't outside of putting trophy on it
I don't really get entire obsession with the rear compartment of the merkava being able to potentially carry troops
main logic behind the engine being in the front isn't survivability or transporting troops, its rearming the tank while under fire since the thing is meant to hold a hole for hours on end and be able to resupply while doing so
even with the flaws in the armor its not really like its ever been a issue for the thing, things still rather survivable especially considering the thing was able to eat kornets and keep going during the 2006 Lebanon war
@manic latch
Soyuz SAP 

the copper rings rest on top of the grooves of the rifling without engaging the rifling

Damage that a Fritz X bomb made to USS Savannah
Bourellets are basically soft(er) slippery metals for centering guide and gliding
The driving bands actually engage the rifling tho
@spring briar Did you know that in French
The only state of Brazil that is written differently from the others is Pernambuco? 
Not that different though
It's "Pernambouc"
that's what I said, no?
@manic latch it's done

At least we will see this shell in War Thunder 
In French
The only Brazilian state that is written different from Portuguese
Is Pernambuco
Which in French is "Pernambouc"
Lost promises 
why
All these shell development/research etc for Soyuz. All to be wasted because of ww2 
I mean, there's multiple "yellow" rings with different purposes 
In this video I ask the curator of the Tank Museum at Bovington David Willey what he thinks is the most underrated American Tank of the Second World War.
Cover design by vonKickass.
Disclaimer: I was invited by the Tank Museum at Bovington in 2022.
https://www.youtube.com/c/thetankmuseum/
https://tankmuseum.org/
»» GET OUR BOOKS ««
» Stukabo...
Yeah understandable
Sounds about right to me
Stuart wasn’t underrated imo, it’s not Overrated either and is treated right imo

Yeah I’d say the lee, most people are realizing the Sherman was exceptional
eh?
“ coffin for 7 brothers” and all
You speak like Lee gets special powers when US crew 
Tried a new kind of immune zone plot, this time including the fore and aft armored bulkheads (11.3” vertical Class A for South Dakota, steering gear protection ignored). Target is South Dakota and gun is Japanese 36cm with WWII shells (Kongō, Fusō, Ise). Also included is max gun range (38.8 kyds).
@maiden citrus @jagged monolith @spring briar @tough quail @eternal veldt @junior trench @ivory ridge
For comparison, contemporary battleship bulkhead protection
The data table
Didnt know you could make plots like that in excel
They’re called Radar plots
I actually used Google sheets for this since I couldn’t be arsed to copy paste into Excel
But you can’t do much to edit the radial “axis” in GS
So it’s a bit wonky
I have this 
I do find it interesting that only the later Iowas, Vanguard, and Yamato have thicker transverse armor bulkheads than SoDak
TNT bricks?
Nitrocellulose
Better than picric acid

Fragmentation was good but the chunks did not have the velocity to really penetrate deeply into bulkheads
All depends on dat bulkhead thickness
And fragmentation size and resulting velocity too
Not a single 40mm bulkhead in sight

tfw no BB caliber HEAT
everyone gangsta til the enemy battleship fires a sabot round at you
Listing Littorio's aft bulkheads as 2.36" on .39" is... Curious
babe wake up, new Potential History just dropped
Should be 11" right?
Depends on the height, but yeah
Once you get below the tween deck the aft bulkhead drops from 280mm to 210mm, and then below that where the bulkhead slops in it's 70mm
Granted, to hit the aft transverse bullhead, you have to either penetrate a 70mm OD plate (of you hit above the battery deck), or a 36mm on 8mm deck, the an a 90mm plate, before you hit the 280mm bulkhead or barbette
And if you want to hit the 210mm section, you'd first have to penetrate the 36mm on 8mm deck, then the 100mm on 8mm deck below that. At which point the 210mm bulkhead could be hit
It is quite evident that the KISS principle was not really a huge influence on Littorio's design
spaced armor
pugliese torpedo defense
No, they weren't trying to keep things simple
My brother in Christ im literally talking about it’s reputation
i mean it's an anachronistic dipshit mobile when it goes into service
i know it has good armor but it's nowhere near good
Does anyone have the pic of an Atlanta-class but with triple 5" mounts instead
Forgive me for asking this
the only triple 5inches ive seen on anything were on one of the cursed NC prelims
based*
Man, i thought i remember seeing one though..
Jesus christ it's a 35mb pic 
Funny comment from the thread this was posted in:
When she passed the Ionian coast my nephew started crying because he thought they were pirates.
Light off of Red Oak Victory boilers in the Summer of 2018 at the California Maritime Academy in Vallejo, California. As described in the video, we performed multiple light-offs to systematically ensure that the burners and boilers were functioning correctly. It turned out that the ship's steam plant is in great shape!
sometimes I wonder why amazon seems to fail so hard at moderating its platform
it was an edit, I don't have it though
also the tank was fine as the channel has been over a lot
M3 was a funny StuG in the CBI

In September 1916, Michigan conducted gunnery practice with the old monitor Miantonomoh as a target, including night shooting drills on the 18th. On 21 September, during another round of shooting at Miantomomoh, the shell in the left gun in Michigan's forward superfiring turret exploded. The gun was severed where it exited the turret and fragments from the shell damaged the forecastle deck and the superstructure. One man was injured by a piece of debris. Michigan returned to the Philadelphia Navy Yard for repairs, arriving there two days later.
no casualties, nice
@spring briar
Sovetskaya Ukraina's 406mm practice shell 
ya ik
650kg, 1.4m lenght 
this shell
Question rich. Is the first shell 406mm or 500mm
It is the 406mm SAP right
the shell I drew yesterday yes
China 8x8
How much stress would a design with 6 triple mounts cause on a hull
I'd be more concerned with the weight and protection of said ship.
stress should not be too big of an issue provided the ship is strongly constructed enough with sufficient strength.
Ntk
just combine the iowas and yamatos and you get the general idea
that's the most powerful use of the word 'just' I have seen in a while
Thats.. an entirely different story lol
lol
I intend to find the practicality in such a design in an original, and genuine way, and not through mushing 2 ships that happened to have a total gun barrel count of 18 guns
Combining 2 very big, and obviously distinct ships is just going to muddy the waters even more
Hmm
There was a Tillman with 5 triple irrc
Yeah man you will need a big ass boat
Now add more lenght for another turret
at that point you drop two of the turrets and switch to larger guns
drop 3 because ABQXY is really inefficient
Yee
dropping three would get you ABY
or AXY

Pats obtained #winning
Anyway, cool
But yeah 6 turrets is just inefficient
there are minor exceptions for very specific roles
Either you have 2 amidships turrets which are doing nothing outside of narrow angles or you have triple superfiring which on a battleship results in a huge top weight from those barrettes
Yeah on a cruiser specifically AA cruiser it makes sense just not on a battleship
tbf, you can Mogamoid or pyramid each end, which somewhat alleviates the topweight
still inefficient
Tone style with 4 turrets at the front

And tbqh if you're completely set on a single calibre just go up to quads
Rather than add more turrets

I'd only go for quads once you've exhausted caliber upgrades
i.e.
hitting 16-17"
Depends maybe you're British and the admiralty won't let you use any guns other than the 15in
they aren't going to let you use any turret other than an ancient 15" twin then, in that case
in which case you very well might have to go for absurd turret layouts if monsters like late model Yamato-class and Montanas are running around
Those 15in shells were very expensive and goddamnit you're gonna use them
choom why are we using 2 AP cap types on the same shell

and why are we using 2 types of rifling on the same turret
Because they're British goddamnit and nothing's gonna stop them from being that
well
except maybe
I suppose I as a Frenchman have no excuse
seeing as the 130mm vs 138.6mm war existed

I propose
you know
the 132mm
this
a compromise


Then why Alsace doesnt have it 
Tell me what went wrong with 130mm Rich
go read navweaps

This DP design was not successful, as the very complicated semi-automatic loading mechanism was prone to jamming. In addition, the very high weight of the fixed ammunition led to rapid crew fatigue and much slower rates of fire.
So where is the potential
Slapping autoloader?
then managed to unfuck the 130mm twin on Le Hardi and planned on using an improvement on the DP version of the 130 used on dunkerque on joffre
Go for 133
where Maka
You asked? 
WG should thank me for pioneering their Flandre
Flandre is a tragedy
game used to bring me a lot of joy, I assure you
no, 132 is 5.2 inches


and hey, Riche, want to know something?
depending on what it is ye
WG was not the first one to use Gloire's camouflage on a different ship.
I made that shit first on Dunkek. 
honoeur
very pretty
I have some other spicier screenies, which I'll put...you know where.
otherwise I'll have some ruffled mods on my ass.
Yamero
I've done shit far far worse 
🌕 
moonuz
Muz
The Soyuz 7K-L1 "Zond" spacecraft was designed to launch men from the Earth to circle the Moon without going into lunar orbit in the context of the Soviet crewed Moon-flyby program in the Moon race. It was based on the Soyuz 7K-OK. Several modifications reduced vehicle mass and increased circumlunar capability. The most notable modifications wer...

140mm ye
Can we talk about modern history
Or only the past
Well yesterday our world history has changed
oh but I don't know if we can talk about that
I'm not sure
We mostly stop around the cold war in general.
I had a hot dog yesterday, and cake
Which country is growing bigger?
If it's about current events, I highly suggest keeping it out.
did you read what I just said


Netherlands is in Western Europe
netherlands is in the atlantic ocean
Netherlands is Netherlands
In nether
Sanglune is Netherlands
... Is what I'd like to say, if he wasnt fucking banned
Damn your gaslighting and your waifus for ruining the fun
On September 30 2022
Out world history has changed and world map is changr
is it though

A annexation took place yesterday
modern politics is bonk worthy with good reason yeah
What about modern history
So Modern history is not History?
One will cause you get bonked by mod Alex 
there's a gag order on current events to avoid any politic shitstorms
I'm just saying that all 
also controversial in the last, like, decade or two iirc
what’s the reason for the twisty bullet
less penetration loss
because the bullet spins
so when the bullet hits a target the splines will nicely screw into the target (lewd)
Mykolaiv Port.. A photograph from a German aircraft, July 1941
The numbers in the photo are:
1 - hull of the unfinished battleship "Sovetskaya Ukraina";
2 - hull of the cruiser "Ordzhonikidze" (project 68/Chapayev);
3 - submarines S-36iS-37;
4 - submarines S-35 (above), L-23 and L-24;
5 - destroyer "Svobodny";
6 - unfinished leader of the destroyers "Kiev";
7 - icebreaker "A. Mikoyan";
8 - Project 30 destroyer
9 - launched cruiser "Frunze" (project 68/Chapayev)

Why do you mean stop
again
talking about controversial current events are against the servers rules
it's a hell of a hornets nest and also something a lot of people want to avoid
Le Molotov's? Rangefinder

Oh ye it's Molotov
3/10 not mounted high enough

nonsensical placement honestly
what's the range between me and the nearest hot dog then
0 if a gentleman brings one to you
true
swell
@rare anchor #server-news message
I already checked it

Good
Le hello
I wonder if these rangefinders are unique design
the rangefinder itself is only the tube
the housing is probably unique
I should look for a good book on the Kirovs
Krazny Kavkaz and the Kirovs my beloveds
Soyuz's rangefinder looks similar to it 
How big is it
Found the internals of this boy
I think 8 stands for 8 meter
8-m stereoscopic range finder
This looks triplex?
Huh
And this duplex
Ye
Any idea on magnification





























