#history
1 messages · Page 14 of 1
French scout looking absurd, what's new? 
Good question
You vs the guy your girl tells you not to worry about
shame honestly, Vextra is a extremely nice looking vehicle
8 wheels >>>> 6 wheels
Never liked the IFV variant tho
12 wheels>>>
always disliked how the French designed their wheeled IFVs looks wise
They smack these extremely small turrets in them that just look awkward
Isn't small turret good thing
More space for crew
I see
Tho if your making a vehicle capable of carrying a entire squad yet maintaining a auto cannon it’s a workable solution
oops that 2nd image was the VBCI
Sensible turret for APC tbf
never really liked it on the VBCI either
such a small turret on such a big vehicle
again design wise it’s perfectly acceptable
looks wise it just looks wrong to me
Is portholes useful
Looks aside, didn't French mechanized infantry squad recently changed into 8-person unit
Wait, that's the entire reason for VBCI isn't it?
or was it the other way around 
VBCIs carry 8 dismounts, 9 if you count the commander
tho that's the same amount as the AMX-10P
Unless you have artificial air ventilation or intend to suffocate your crew to death, yes.
(Or turn your ship into a giant floating gas bomb, in the case of Taihou and Lexington)
What period we're talking about? Imagine not CBRN-proof in 21st century 
M113AS4s having a turret so small the commander can't fit in with anything on their plate carrier
Damn this place is bombing
Bombing Belgrade yes
Dinosaur time
found a rather blatantly pro-Imperial Japan movie about the Indonesian Independences @royal quail @gilded girder https://youtu.be/vWQx1I2MTjE
among the hilarious shit I find:
the Japanese are potrayed as benevolent saviors of Asia
omitting the multiple anti-Japan rebellions in the Dutch East Indies by 1945
no mention of atrocities like the Romusha or the Pontianak Masssacres
the fact that the red-white flag was not allowed to be flowned by the Japanese administration is seen as a positive thing
then there's a scene where some PETA soldiers talked like this:
"Kami tatakau sebagai Indonesia guntai melawan rengougun. Taichou, tatakatte hoshii bersama kami!"
Merdeka 17805 atau Murudeka 17805 (Bahasa Jepang:ムルデカ 17805) Merdeka 17805 atau Murudeka 17805 (Bahasa Jepang :ムルデカ 17805) adalah film drama perang yang dirilis tahun 2001. Film ini adalah film hasil kolaborasi rumah produksi film dari Jepang dan Indonesia. Cerita dalam film ini dibuat berdasar kisah nyata tentang perjuangan sejumlah personel da...
the Japanese, back in 2001

honestly that dialogue is the worst thing about the movie because it sounds like a terminal stage weeb

"Kami tatakau sebagai Indonesia guntai melawan rengougun. Taichou, tatakatte hoshii bersama kami!"
I... what?

inb4 P&W getting it again 
With the next update on the Ukraine war delayed on account of the the Kharkiv counter-offensive, I thought it would be good to return to some defence economics with a study of global military ship and submarine exports.
When we think of major naval powers, we usually think of the big players. The USA, the USSR/Russia & the PRC - but surprising...
Subscribe here: http://9Soci.al/chmP50wA97J Full Episodes: https://9now.app.link/uNP4qBkmN6 | Sea King Down (2006)
It was a terrible mistake, a terrible, terrible waste, and only now can the true story be told. It began as a mercy mission; an Australian Navy team overseas, saving lives after the tsunami. It ended a year ago this Sunday, when th...
@remote monolith some indonesian history from the 2004 boxing day tsunami
"Anakin is gone. I'm what remains."
The Savannah is assisting the Allied amphibious landing at Salerno on the Italian mainland, firing on enemy tanks, and conducting counter-battery fire on a railroad artillery battery. It is targeted by a German Do 217 bomber, which releases a Fritz X and guides it towards the Savannah. Unable to evade this guided munition and it traveling too fast to be intercepted by the onboard anti-aircraft guns, the Fritz X slams into the Savannah’s C turret, crashing through multiple decks before exploding.
The entire turret crew is killed immediately, and the damage from the Fritz X spreads to the lower ammunition handling section of the ship triggering follow-up explosions. In all, 206 sailors are killed in the attack, and 15 more are seriously wounded. Though damaged heavily, Savannah’s damage control crews contain the flooding and the fires, stopping the ship from sinking. While still afloat, the Savannah requires heavy repairs. Though this is the first time a US ship has been struck by a Fritz X, it is not the first time the Fritz X has been used in combat.
The Fritz X made its combat debut this past summer, and notably a few days ago back on 9 September the Italian battleship Roma was hit by multiple Fritz Xs as it was on its way to surrender itself over to the Allies. As a result of the extensive damages sustained, the Roma sank off the coast of Sardinia, taking 1,253 of her crew out of 1,849 down with her.
Picture: The moment a Fritz X slams into turret C of the USS Savannah, 11 September 1943
Source: U.S. Naval History and Heritage Command - #NH 95562```
@tough quail Look at this beauty
It was an experimental project. Soviet M-62 Diesel engine on MZKT chassis
Sadly this baby barely has any documentation. It's unknown if she still exists today
Irrc. This design was for transporting workers to locations hard to reach
So why build railways when you can give wheels to the train
bote
fast bote
I can’t believe it
This passage is from Alamein by Jon Latimer. “The Principles of War” podcast has a 4-part series on the use of artillery at 2nd Alamein, in particular the crucial role of the Australian gunners and commanders (episodes 88-91) for those interested in hearing more.
Hey y'all, we're back with our first video walking around the dock floor. Here Travis is going to explain some of the work that's been going on as well as what's to come. Of course, if you have any questions, feel free to ask!
One thing we would like to say is that due the huge amount of support y'all have been showing us, we are completely in...
US Navy UCAV is looks like.........
Lookin like those paper airplanes I folded in primary school
Probably slightly more expensive, though
I know at least that top pic is a few years old
well it actually looks like MQ-101 from Ace combat 7
yep
sadly the X-47B and the X-47C are likely never gonna see the light of day
priorities got shifted from surveillance and strike to purely refueling
in terms of carrier UCAVs
look towards the Turkish
with the USAF and Aussies looking into similar systems as well
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kratos_XQ-58_Valkyrie
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_MQ-28_Ghost_Bat
The Kratos XQ-58 Valkyrie is an experimental stealthy unmanned combat aerial vehicle (UCAV) designed and built by Kratos Defense & Security Solutions for the United States Air Force Low Cost Attritable Strike Demonstrator (LCASD) program, under the USAF Research Laboratory’s Low Cost Attritable Aircraft Technology (LCAAT) project portfolio. It w...
The Boeing MQ-28 Ghost Bat, previously known as the Boeing Airpower Teaming System (ATS) and the Loyal Wingman project, is a stealth, multirole, unmanned aerial vehicle in development by Boeing Australia for the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF). It is designed as a force multiplier aircraft capable of flying alongside manned aircraft for suppor...
ghost bat isnt planned to have carrier capability currently
probably should of specified that there similar non carrier systems
for the XQ-58 and MQ-28
Ariete AMV prototype PT2 with the improvements in the turret
The two British gunboats engaged the Germans with their 6 in (150 mm) and 12-pounder weapons, but the enemy fire was so accurate that they were forced to withdraw. USS Endicott, with only one 5 in (130 mm) gun in operation, opened fire from within 1,500 yd (1,400 m) of the enemy ships. The Germans switched fire from the gunboats to Endicott and hit her, wounding one man, the only American casualty. Although a dud, the shell tore a large hole in Endicott's side. In an engagement that lasted just under an hour, the Americans and the Germans dueled at close range until both the corvette and the yacht were sunk. The Allies then resumed their bombardment of the city. When later asked why he engaged two enemy vessels, Captain Bulkeley replied, "What else could I do? You engage, you fight, you win. That is the reputation of our Navy, then and in the future".
tis but a scratch

interesting
btw, I have something to ask:
Does Attack Aircraft basically become a catch all/umbrella term for planes other than fighters and pure bombers post-WW2? I'm asking because by the time the term went on vogue, previous aircraft such as dive bombers have become obsolete in their role
Shout out to @chilly flower
I think it should be strike aircraft
I figure it's a bit interchangeable? but yeh you get the gist.
strike aircraft is the catch all for basically all multirole aircraft
attacker is mainly just for the dedicated CAS platforms
technically you can fit aircraft like the F-111 and F-117 into the attacker role
Tho the F-117 was more a bomber than anything
and the F-111 sorta just covers multiple bomber/attacker roles
A-10/Su-25 
more like MANPAD bait
He did asked about dedicated Cas 
tho I suppose recent conflicts kinda prove that dedicated attackers can survive in contested air space environments just with a less than ideal survival rate compared to other types
Well they do fly low
Got armor compared to other
And usually has an ideal target
just throw a tarp over them while they're in the air so the enemy cant tell what they are
I mean long range SAMs don’t really matter if you’re basically hugging the ground
This is why A-10 and Su-25 will stay based and in service no matter how many haters they have
again the A-10 is a aging platform with a no longer active production line
So when it will retire? 
hopefully soon
Surely not before the F-22
again I don’t believe the A-10 is useless I just believe it’s past it’s prime
Prime of dedicated CAS. Oh boy we can even go back to ww2
Il-2 my beloved
A-38 was too good for this world
Only two build but
Can't go wrong with 75mm
Using B-29 engines too
A-10 should definitely be gone before the F-22 imo
since the F-22's replacement is still being developed
B-52 with new engines 
whereas there are already other platforms to replace the A10's CAS role
mixture of light attack craft, multi role fighters and likely drones could easily cover its role
Drones already have the loiter time USAF just needs something with equivalent payload
Remote-controlled Super Warthog 
the only remaining reason the A-10 is in service is its payload yeh.
IIRC even as way back as 2001-2002 Predator drones can be equipped with light CAS, but on the level of A-10 payload, not yet.
I mean the primary issues are payload and responsible response times
The General Atomics Mojave is an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) capable of short takeoff and landing (STOL), being developed by General Atomics Aeronautical Systems. First unveiled on December 9, 2021, General Atomics states that it is to fulfill the roles of reconnaissance, close air support and armed overwatch.
The Mojave might have potential
tho I suppose conventional aircraft could response timely
"responsible response times" So input lag apologies for the lame joke.
Nonetheless, I would say that regular aircraft will still have place.
If the airframes weren’t 40+ years old I’d argue converting the A-10 into a unmanned platform wouldn’t be the worse idea
tho I don’t really think life extension is the best idea for the A-10 fleet
agreed. unless there was a recent branch development of a new airframe with the A-10 platform (which it wasn't), it quickly becomes obsolete.
So apparently
The Soviets had a full auto battle rifle by the winter war that wasn’t the federov
The AVS-36
Select fire too
If there's one role that benefit the most from unmanned platform, it would be CAS
High risk environment
yeap
was canned in part because the soviets realized full auto rifle caliber was awful for standard use
which is why the succeeding svt from tokarev didnt include it
lady & gentlemen
the quora post to rule them all
"why didn't they just rush B[ritain]???????"
submarines not part of fleet actions?
what if submarine was fleet
we will meat you in north atlantic tommarow, be there or be square
When the Bantai Kessen theorist has a child with the wehrb:
But eh, this joke doesnt quite work, they shouldnt procreate
huh? it's fine, the japanese are honorary orions
HE?
Even the SAP and AP tbh
When the first British investigation team examined the wreck of Tirpitz on 21-22 May 1945, they noticed a huge dishing of the hull above the bilge keel. The dishing in the outer bottom plating extended over an area of 15 x 5m, the maximum inboard deflection at the center being about 83cm. They naturally assumed this damage had been caused by a near miss Tallboy.
However, when the British returned in September 1945 and spent 40 days on a thorough survey of the wreck and the surroundings, they found on closer examination that this damage had in fact been temporarily repaired. The bomb had caused splits in the welding over a considerable area and these splits had been made watertight by driving in steel liners and welding on patches under water. The repair had been continued from inboard after pumping out the compartment.
Damage to plating and frames was extensive, and no attempt had been made to alter the shape of the bulge in the bottom plating. Instead, fabricated transverse frames had been built around it on the inside. It was concluded that this damage was the result of a near miss during the Fleet Air Arm attack in Kaafjord on 3 April 1944 (Operation Tungsten).
Picture from the first investigation team’s report. The boat and the sailor in the picture are German – part of the German salvage team.
points at faulty double bottom
@spring briar Any info on if the APC M1924 was actually issued to ships?
If so, why modify the M1912-1921 to use K dye bags in 1940?
Wait, misread that

Second question still applies tho
That would imply using the Bretagnes together in a fleet
I’d have to check chambers on the BB barrels to see if it would fit
But I can’t concretely say it was used on the BBs
The modification of the Mle.1912-1921 would suggest that that was used over the mle.1924

But it could also just be to bring the older APC up to modern MN standards
Not quite sure how a normal double bottom ship would have handled a 6 ton bomb exploding right next to it
which kinda applies to a lot of things that happened to Tirpitz

like I don't think any other battleship had four tons of explosive go off underneath
Terre Neuve was actually right next to Dunkek
and we see what that did
not trying to dis tirpitz here
just showing that the double bottom failed exactly where the fault is
Hmm, a Tallboy would have 2.5 tons of Torpex, which would be like 3.8 tons of TNT equivalent
I'll dig through the diaries
oh hey, there is a dedicated report for Operation tungsten
Trust me bro
W/D³, Post Dreadnought AP
[SAP or Common used when indicated]
18" Furious (8crh) - 0.569
16" Nelson - 0.500
15" Queen Elizabeth (early) - 0.569
15" Queen Elizabeth (interwar) - 0.574
14" KGV - 0.579
13.5" Orion (early) - 0.515
13.5" KGV (early) - 0.569
12" Dreadnought (early) - 0.492
8" Kent [SAPC] - 0.500
7.5" Hawkins [SAPC] - 0.474
6" Tiger - 0.601
6" Leander [CPBC] - 0.519
16" Colorado (early) - 0.515
16" Colorado (mid-interwar) - 0.547
16" North Carolina - 0.659
14" Nevada (early) - 0.510
14" Nevada (mid-interwar) - 0.547
12" South Carolina - 0.503
12" Alaska - 0.660
8" Pensacola - 0.508
8" Baltimore - 0.654
6" Omaha - 0.486
6" Brooklyn - 0.602
18.11" Yamato - 0.542
16.14" Nagato (mid-interwar) - 0.535
14" Kongō (early) - 0.510
14" Kongō (mid-interwar) - 0.541
7.87" Furutaka - 0.497
8" Takao - 0.542
6" Agano [Common] - 0.463
6.1" Mogami - 0.543
14.96" Bayern - 0.494
14.96" Bismarck - 0.527
12.01" Helgoland (early) - 0.515
11.02" Nassau - 0.495
11.02" Lützow - 0.494
11.02" Scharnhorst - 0.544
8.27" Blücher - 0.420
7.99" Admiral Hipper - 0.527
5.91" Königsberg - 0.486
14.96" Richelieu - 0.582
13.39" Bretagne (early) - 0.496
13.39" Bretagne (early interwar) - 0.509
12.99" Dunkerque [SAPC] - 0.563
12.01" Courbet - 0.545
8" Duquesne - 0.576
6.1" Duguay-Trouin [SAPC] - 0.549
6" Emile Bertin [SAPC] (late interwar) - 0.583
15" Littorio - 0.578
12.6" Conte di Cavour - 0.578
12" Dante Alighieri - 0.577
10" San Giorgio - 0.500
8" Trento - 0.539
7.5" San Giorgio - 0.475
6" Condottieri - 0.509
noone:
Jaba: 13.39"

ohno
after 1934, when dye bags were being added to french shells in service, they also looked into powder visible at night
which contains phosphorous

Powder visible at night?
yes
As in, on bursting, or muzzle flash, or glow-in-the-dark?
glow in the dark
they scrapped that and went with the contact detonation method instead as you can see on richie so no
Okay good
kekw
why would that be so oh nyo

hol up
French 340mm coastal batteries had an option to fire the shell to a height of 22km to encounter minimal drag
look at that juicy elevation
love my french radar fc 340mm high elevation coastal artillery

USN 16" coastal batteries were also radar FC by 1943 i guess?
or 1942
idk
dunno
by 1943 there was like 0 threat of a japanese invasion
Yeh
and radars are still needed by the fleet
Also turns out mainbat RPC didn't get put on the fast BBs until starting Feb 1943
And for various reasons NC only got hers in 1944
The 5" batteries got them right away tho
people forget the USN in practice became what they think it was in 1937 only in 1943

farragut in 1936 with radar FC bro
Mostly because in wartime you only give stuff to ships when they are back in port for repairs


otherwise they are doing cool warship shit yo
that's when the dunkeks alledgedly got their delay coils
donut disturb
Of course Tirpitz took two underwater near misses around that location (assuming it's starboard that you found, but there is no mention of notable portside damage in that region)
One during Tungsten, but no mention of that bulge, just the holes in the hull
And one from the first Tallboy attack
actually two bombs during Tungsten
why do french documents list the 240mm mle 1906 at 950 m/s and navweaps at 800 m/s

am I missing smth
Operation Tungsten didn't involve Tallboys though?
Correct
Nine of the Barracudas were to be armed with 1,600-pound bombs and a further 22 would each carry three 500-pound semi-armour-piercing bombs that were capable of penetrating the lightly protected upper decks of the ship if dropped from above 2,000 feet (610 m). The remaining ten aircraft would be armed with 500- and 600-pound general-purpose bombs and with anti-submarine bombs intended to inflict casualties among the battleship's crew and cause underwater damage if they exploded in the water near her hull.
but as I wrote just now, the first Tallboy Strike had a near miss around the same location where two near misses happened during Tungsten
the most likely culprit in the 600 pound depth bombs
sounds more reasonable
also Rich's post notes that they thought it was a Tallboy near miss
only to conclude that it definitely wasn't and was from Tungsten
anyone want to know the price per kg of french AP shells in 1911?
oh, I see where I confused myself
it's 500 and 600 pound GP bombs with unspecified depth bombs
not 600 pound depth bombs
And I look at the German damage assessments, see no mention of a 15x5m hull deformation in the aftermath of Tungsten and then a month later a Tallboy strike around that area that caused major hull deformations above and below water
And say maybe, maybe, the British assessment is wrong
I'd expect a tallboy exploding that close in shallow water next to tirpitz to do the same as the explosion of Terre Neuve did to Dunkerque
were tirpitz' mags full then?
Should be
oof
Not full full, but definitely not empty
wonder what that would look like
that being said I did find a rather amusing hand of god depth charge that's somewhat close in weight
a 745 pound depth charge with a 600 pound TNT charge
💀
though nothing can compare to the early attempts of converted naval mines
actually
it seems there's too many gun cotton and low filler weight for total weight mines
for that to hold true
Also amusing to see the ammo consumption of Tirpitz's long and medium AA during Tungsten, she fired 8% of her heavy AA ammo (506 rds) and 1.2% of her medium AA ammo (400)
Both in absolute numbers and in relative numbers the heavy AA pumped out more
well
how high were the planes flying
More about Fjords being absolute garbage for medium AA usage
especially when there is heavy fog usage
the targets only appear briefly, and then like right on top
smiles in Austerlitz
so the 20mm carried most of the weight, and the 105s were doing barrage fire at the sectors the planes went through during their approach into the fjord
Navweaps: doesn't state that french 340mm rifling went from 4° to 6° at the muzzle


centrifugal fuze
very cool
@spiral cedar
from 1909
chrome-nickel shells for better oblique performance
what say

sleepu
france seems to be the only country that receives its shells in oblique hits
which is weirdly worded
shell comes home
In actuallity, in France, APC shells are through their requirements capable of piercing cemented steel armor of the same thickness as their caliber under 15° or 20° oblique impact
for SAPC shells this would be about half their caliber
I love obliquity requirements
🇺🇸 🇫🇷
Carnot vs Dreadnought
the dreadnought vs the all big gun bb project she tells you not to worry about

I prefer KOR-2 
Noice
🇫🇷 🤝 🇬🇧
http://imstuck.wix.com/imstuckgcserevision
Battle of Jutland - The Main Sea Battle of WW1 - GCSE History
IN this video, we look at the main battle of WW1 - The Battle of Jutland. In this battle, there were 25 ship casualties and ended up playing an important role in the result of the battle.
thanks jaba

Use this to bleach your eyes
I wish they had gone through with the further modernization project which would have replaced the twin 57's with 100mm mle 1953's

Should have been moved to Scotland while he thinks the Scots were sus.
OOC, but Peak English thinking there.
more peak English political thinking 
tho to be fair, if they allow Edinburgh to safekeep it it would be less of a hassle back then
friends
why is there a saint chamond just chilling with the germans
i don't think the germans used captured saint chamonds
there's literally 3 of them standing still while their comrades are getting barbecued
are they on strike again
merde petain isn't even on duty today
they're getting into very deep cover
also i like the idea that like
eight guys with glamethrowers would get this close
wait uh
before one of them gets popped and sets all their friends on fire
...
none of them have the spiky helmets
french didn't even use flamethrowers
bruh
i mean this makes sense
in another scene we see the chamonds bombarding the shit out of that very same trench
I misread that as salmon due to splatoon 3 and was looking for it
fellow splatoon gamer
weird looking turf war though the ink color is nice

turf war is for casuals
bursting blood vessels over clam blitz is peak splatoon gameplay
'I'm not a casual I play salmon rush co-op' - person playing splatoon with joycons in handheld mode
those are french troops tho
like
look at the helmets
clearly an adrian
yea i acknowledged that
the thing is they all had flamethrowers, something the germans not french used
And here we have French troops using flamethrowers in WW1
They also had single man portable ones like the Germans
And they used captured German ones
where is this from btw
probably all quiet on the western front
Netflix teaser for all quiet on western front
gotcha
On yt
local german horrified after learning other countries use flamethrowers too
more at 11
@『DEATH_PENALTY』#0406 What did Dunkerque have for backing of the main belt and main armor deck? Jordan isn't quite clear; half the time it's just the 225mm of KC on 60mm of teak backing, but on one page there's also 16mm of unknown backing material (HT? MS?) on every frame with a belt. Which is correct?
ah, ping broke
@spring briar
225mm armor steel + 16mm structural for belt with 60 mm backing
125mm armor steel + 15mm structural steel for deck (dunno if there's teak backing here)
these are the numbers given on the plans
Dumas mentions that all backing is 60mm of teak for vertical armor but doesn't mention backing for decks
but why teak
RN fans when they realise their ships use teak backing instead of oak backing /s
RN in shambles
Does MS or HT make more sense for structural steel here?
constitution stole it
if MS means mild steel
well you're st steel
special trustee
We talking HT or D steel?
I'll look for it
Was D steel used in other areas of French ships?
ok it should all be HT steel
Any info on the thickness of the weather deck or outer hull?
any armor steel should be 80 or 100 kg steel and the 15 or 16 mm backing should be 50 kg steel
basically as in Algérie
the outer hull should be 10 mm thick
Thought Constitution had some douglas fir?
Or am I confusing myself with US flight deck material
jaba do you copy
yeah the 18 mm was inside
Any idea on weather deck?
constitution is pine and oak iirc
12 - 5 mm for the top
22 + 12 - 20 mm for the one below
on this diagram
I'll edit it gmm
mkmk
yes
Want it to be extra splinter resistant
Muchos gracias señorita
did any USN ships experience cable tunnel flooding issues
me going to bed at night, thinking of montana's armored tubings
seems to be the shared experience of all nations in ww2 when it comes to navies
flooding through cable tunnels
- Progressive flooding of compartments through bulkhead stuffing tubes for electric cable has long been a serious nuisance to ships receiving underwater damage. Leakage through bulkhead stuffing tubes, however, rarely has permitted complete flooding of a compartment. The most serious cases of such flooding occurred on DENVER (CL58)* and INDEPENDENCE (CVL22)*, where the damage control problems were complicated by such leakage. A complete discussion of the improvement in packing stuffing tubes and in watertight construction of electrical cable is included in the War Damage Report for the above vessels.
same reports on richie and dunkek
sadly it was never fixed on the dunkeks because you know
- Compartment C-408-L. Note door 4-113-2 shored. Water on deck was from leaks through electric cable stuffing tubes and leakage at base of doors 4-113-2 and 4-113-1.
- Compartment C-408-L showing electric cable stuffing tubes in bulkhead 113 which leaked.
- The ability of these ships to absorb damage and withstand flooding from torpedo hits reflects the high standards of the basic designs with respect to strength, stability and subdivision, as well as many improvements which have been made in systems and equipment. These two cases, however point up the importance of the need for constant vigilance with respect to matters of detail in design and construction. The most important lesson from these two cases is that in both ships open piping systems and electrical cable bulkhead stuffing tubes contributed to the flooding of compartments and spaces beyond the limits of structural damage. Changes have been authorized and completed in the majority of the ships of the two classes to correct the deficiencies uncovered. Improved methods of construction also have been developed and where practicable have been applied to existing ships as availability permitted.
- Compartments C-404-M and C-507-M flooded full through electric cable stuffing tubes. The flooding of these spaces was not immediately detected because of their somewhat remote location relative to the scene of damage control activity. C-408-L flooded to a depth of about one foot through electric cable stuffing tubes and also through a faulty arrangement of the non-automatic fixed fog system.
- All radio transmitters went dead when the radio motor generators, all of which were located in the after gyro room, were flooded out. Water reached the forward and after main distribution boards via electric cables, but these quickly were disconnected and the boards were cleared before any serious damage was caused.
Second platform compartments C-504-M, C-506-M, C-507-M and C-508-M flooded to a depth of about 6 inches through electric cable stuffing tubes.
- On both of these ships water traveling inside the cable sheaths of individual cables caused a great deal of trouble at various switchboards and panels. This has occurred in many other cases of damage. Since 1 January 1945, all electric cable produced for the Navy has been watertight, in which the cable is sealed throughout its length to prevent the flow of water under pressure through the cable core. Cable-end sealing, in addition, still remains mandatory. Sealing of ends of important power cables also has been authorized for ships in service, but the repair workload in the various yards has precluded large-scale accomplishment of this very desirable alteration. The most important circuits, however, should be protected, even if all cables cannot be sealed.
Photo 12: Compartment C-408-L. Note door 4-113-2 shored. Water on deck was from leaks through electric cable stuffing tubes and leakage at base of doors 4-113-2 and 4-113-1.
Photo 13: Compartment C-408-L showing electric cable stuffing tubes in bulkhead 113 which leaked.
E. Ammunition Behavior
-
In reference (dd) the Commanding Officer of DENVER pointed out the excellent resistance of 5-inch/38 service ammunition to extreme crushing resulting from battle damage. The point of impact on DENVER was located about 8 feet from the forward lower corner of C-405-M, the projectile stowage and lower handling room for 5-inch mount No. 5. There were about 1000 projectiles and possibly one or two 5-inch/38 cartridges in tanks in this compartment.
-
The outboard longitudinal bulkhead was blown violently inboard and the compartment reduced to half of its original volume. Several projectiles were thrown, nose first, against solid structure with great force. Several of the fuses were pinched between metal objects or were almost destroyed by impact. There is evidence that a sensitive element of one fuse may have detonated. There was no detonation, however, of any of the main explosive charges. Photo 26 shows the condition of compartment C-405-M after damage. Photo 27 shows projectiles recovered from this compartment. Powder tanks illustrated were recovered from compartment C-403-M, the 5-inch powder magazine directly inboard of C-405-M. This compartment also was severely damaged. Cartridge cases were thrown violently about and battered. A few tanks and cases were broken sufficiently to allow powder to escape, several pounds being found in oil tanks below the magazines. There was no evidence of detonation or fire.
- As stated in paragraph 101, there was no evidence of any fragment attack on the interior structure of the magazines or on the projectiles in the magazines. The liquid layer between the torpedo detonation and the magazine (approximately 7 feet) appears to have been sufficient to stop fragments or at least reduce their velocity to a harmless value. Damage to the ammunition in compartments C-405-M, C-403-M and C-503-M was due entirely to shock and the crushing action of structure. Against this type of damage, the projectiles showed excellent resistance.
- In reference (b), the Commanding Officer of INDEPENDENCE made particular note of the fact that "7 fully ready torpex loaded torpedoes within thirty feet of the explosion did not detonate". The torpedo warhead magazine, C-506-M, was empty. The torpedoes referred to by the Commanding Officer were located in racks on the hangar deck between frames 104 and 116 on the port side. These torpedoes were about 38 feet from the point of detonation. In this location, they were not subjected to blast, fragment attack, crushing or fire.

not worries
Dumas mentions that all steel that isn't cemented is either high tensile steel for backing or special armor steel for bulkheads and internal armor
don't even want to think about using ducol for bulkheads
can't weld that shit
In my notes I have 36 deg from vertical listed for the deck slope, but these two diagrams seem to depict 34 deg from vertical
If you happen to have an exact figure, ping me

Of course it does
so what would you like me to give you
Amidships or abreast machinery
then the angle on Jordan's diagram of frame 96.5 should be correct
mkmk
Dunkerque Immune Zone
Machinery Area ("Standard" comparison)
Vertical protection:
Outer hull - 0.39" HT
Main belt - 8.86" French KC at 11.5 deg w/ 2.36" wood & 0.63" HT
Splinter deck - 1.57" French NCA at 34 deg
Horizontal protection:
Weather deck - 0.2" HT
First deck - 0.79" HT
Main armor deck - 4.53" French NCA w/ 0.59" HT backing
Splinter deck - 1.57" French NCA
Strasbourg Immune Zone
Machinery Area ("Standard" comparison)
Vertical protection:
Outer hull - 0.39" HT
Main belt - 11.14" French KC at 11.83 deg w/ 2.36" wood & 0.63" HT
Splinter deck - 1.97" French NCA at 34 deg
Horizontal protection:
Weather deck - 0.2" HT
First deck - 0.79" HT
Main armor deck - 4.53" French NCA w/ 0.59" HT backing
Splinter deck - 1.57" French NCA
@spring briar Final confirmation this is correct?
oh no he's gonna shoot them
Don't worry, they'll get to shoot back
We live in an estate
Three of them to be fair
33 - 1334, 54.3 - ncp
34 - 1338, 52.7 - ncp
35 - 1344, 51.1 - 341, 29.0
36 - 1351, 49.5 - ncp
37 - 1359, 47.9 - 216, 20.9
38 - 1370, 46.3 - 442, 25.9
39 - 1384, 44.8 - 552, 27.7
Sometimes it do be like that
@maiden citrus @jagged monolith @spring briar @tough quail @eternal veldt @junior trench @ivory ridge
Dunkerque machinery immune zone against Scharnhorst 28cm/54.5 SK C/34 APC
SUMMARY
**Immune zone - 19000-37000 yards (18000 yards wide)**
"Completely" immune zone - 21000-34000 yards (13000 yards wide) [no holing of main belt or main armor deck]
Strasbourg machinery immune zone against Scharnhorst 28cm/54.5 SK C/34 APC
SUMMARY
**Immune zone - 15000-37000 yards (22000 yards wide)**
"Completely" immune zone - 16000-34000 yards (18000 yards wide) [no holing of main belt or main armor deck]
(up next will be Scharn against Dunk 330mm)
that's quite the difference
Keeping in mind of course that this is at 90 deg target angle, and thus a "best case scenario" for belt penetration
right, just I knew stras had improvements but that's quite noticeable
Yeh, just adding context
General rule is an extra 1" of belt gets about 2k yards on inner zone for zero to low inclines
hehe

Now to make a scale model 16”/45 Mark 6
just need to paint it and add driving band
Scharnhorst machinery immune zone against Dunkerque 33cm/50 SAPC
SUMMARY
**Immune zone - 12000-28000 yards (16000 yards wide)**
"Completely" immune zone - 27000-28000 yards (1000 yards wide) [no holing of main belt or main armor deck]
Advantageous ranges, broadside-on:
(effective penetrations only)
Dunkerque v. Scharnhorst
>37k - neither (Dunk deck, Scharn deck)
29k-37k - Dunkerque (Dunk none, Scharn deck) [9]
20-28k - neither (Dunk none, Scharn none)
13-19k - Scharnhorst (Dunk belt, Scharn none) [-7]
0-12k - neither (Dunk belt, Scharn belt)
Strasbourg v. Scharnhorst
>37k - neither (Stras deck, Scharn deck)
29k-37k - Strasbourg (Stras none, Scharn deck) [9]
15-28k - neither (Stras none, Scharn none)
13-14k - Scharnhorst (Stras belt, Scharn none) [-2]
0-12k - neither (Stras belt, Scharn belt)
This last past is just a bonus, don't complain about the questionable assumption of 90 deg target angle hits
it would be interesting to check underwater pens of dunky on scharn


and what if I deliver you the velocity of the shell after traveling in the water for x distance tomorrow

I’m probably gonna take it easy with muzzle energy tables ‘tomorrow’
If I have time I might check out the Cavours
Oh yeah, funny thing
KGV pens Scharn’s sloped deck at a 90 deg target angle at 8k yards
Rather than 11k by Dunk
mass difference?
KGV is 1590 lbs with 1399 lb body; Dunk is 1234.59 lb with 1111.13 lb body
(1595 with K dye bag)
Mm don’t think so?
Yeah, but that might be the largest change we’ve seen between those two figures
Nah, the biggest is probably when the Brit 15” is hitting Bismarck
Because inner zone is 0k
Oh true since that’s a meme
If you assume a long range fight
that's a given
the whole reason behind the 33cm is long range stuff
you just need to have an actual opportunity for that
Now, you can probably make a strong case that each yard of immune zone beyond 30k yards has much less importance than, say, in the 15k-25k yard band
I have my own ideas on how to weight those, but that’s ultimately a matter of personal preference
Because I reserve the right to dimiss engagements beyond 30k yards
since those... rarely happened between battleships if at all?
true
not to mention Scharn has actual AP, Dunk has SAPC and that will affect the numbers shown here by Jaba in Scharn's favour
Oh right, I need to make my graphical barbette comparison at some point 
You know that I will face another brainlet that will tell me that French battleships win anything by going bow in
because bouncy bounce
poggers
Ah but don’t you see, Scharnhorst goes bow in and bounces everything to her bow
And then of course it’s a torpedo fight

I wonder what your opinion is in the difference of filler weight between the two shells and how this would affect the outcome of an engagement, Jaba
If we're going to that level you'd want to start adding in expected hits per minute, etc.
Which is a more complex problem
La Tomatina?
how to become a christmas battleship:
let strasbourg and dunk shell you for a bit
how to become a submarine battleship:
let wahshington shell you for a bit 

roundabout
got a bit heavier over time, since they added lotsa AA and some radar and stuff
also that entire rear superstructure that was modified
say
any reason you retrofitted her bow to an atlantik bow but it really didn't help much in the end?
nono I mean IRL
oh, well, I didn't do stuff to her, wanna be clear about that
tho from what I read it helped a bit
and a bit is better than nothing

and not much else they could've done, you can't just raise the weather deck by a meter or two
have you tried it
I find it cringe when people talk as if they did anything during WW2
same with dunky and stras
they died a lot
and revived
and then died some more

you went with 110mm?

Time to fix
it's 105
80mm

same as most of the horizontal deck
should give Scharn a better window in case she stumbles into Dunk during an Atlantic storm
sirene where is Strasbourg in AL
artist still not sure what fetish to go for

jaba requires some sleep
Clearly


jaba go to bed
Am in
Kinda like imagining what Yamato would do to Scharnhorst
yamato has garbage shells
M
But still big and gonna hurt

32mm bow weak, Yamato will destroy everything with the famous and historical overmatch mechanic.
That is why Richelieu is tier 8 and Musashi is tier 9, check fucking mate.

[Unobtainable]
but hey fuck this radar bs
Irrelevant, /s
Just... French ships darting around at 54 knots, no shits given, and landing most shots perfectly is irritating enough
Vibing hard
I oddly have a lot of bones to pick with how WG depicted the MN
From MBRB to turboboosting
Guess Phoenix is also reeling from the SAP BS from the Italain cruisers.
the turbo is understandable, but not to the degree it is shown in wows
SAP just doesn't act like actual SAP
Remind me, how should it act? Like the AP in game?
armor schemes are null

ap with less pen breathes in at oblique hits
and slightly less pen at perpendicular hits
and higher burster ofc
SAPC exists so yes
it helps
that's why british common pointed shells didn't work as well
MBRB is bullshit
You know what is BS
No listing mechanic
Ship literally eats shit from 3 torpedo hits, bow and stern completely severed from the explosive charge, turret crew entirely dead
no flooding from underwater hits
getting hit by a full bb salvo under the water line would flood atleast a dozen compartiments on real botes
Just very no, as much as
and many others were saved
Also no cruelty that is a machinery hit
Shell enter, explodes, blows steam lines
Everyone in the machinery compartment dies from scalding high pressure steam
sounds like dunkek moment
Taffy 3 too, IIRC
WoWs: A BB broadside of AP into a DD does nothing
IRL: one BB AP sinks a DD
At 0940 a 16-inch round fired from 12,000 yards crashed into Fougueux. This, the first direct hit obtained by an American warship, crumpled the destroyer’s bow up to the quarterdeck, drove the stem underwater, and set the bridge afire. Fougueux rapidly flooded and Commander Sticca ordered the crew to abandon ship.
Yea, electricity was knocked out too IIRC
Oh right, we solced the Fougueux mystery

bad
It wasnt Wichita or Brooklyn that killed her
It was Massy
The third (wo) man
Detective novel material
Now give me skin Manjoob you shits
I have several questions
Funny thing, there used to be a time where if an AP shell enters a DD longitudinally, the shell will arm and... What you described happens.
It was actually stunning at deterring destroyers from making suicidal torpedo runs on battleships.
Alas, "balans" for braindead players
french dd's getting hit by 16" shells

Fougueux, Milan, Le Malin
who else
hmmm
Not a DD, but didnt Primaguet beach herself then burned to death?
dunno if the shell on Le Malin even armed
yes
Primauguet got ganged up on by the whole US task force and burnt out after beaching

Primauguet how would you like to fight Wichita, Augusta, Tuscaloosa and Brooklyn?

massachussetts's hit on Milan followed up by 2 8" hits
26-28k yds
however, Primauguet showed how though she was despite the many hits and the fire
A less significant victim of this engagement was the boat in which General Patton had intended to reach the beach from the flagship Augusta. The boat had been swung out on davits in preparation for launch when muzzle blast from the cruiser's 8-inch guns blew out the bottom of the boat, causing most of Patton's luggage to be lost overboard.
@eternal veldt
have a video of me one shotting a dd as arizona this way
I delete those for a living back then
Imagine my anger when they said calibers of 280+ gets slashed anyway
mass with the longest range hit irl and in azur lane
of course, they're cuties
They aligned with P*tain
That's clearly history dont you see
Lmao
Shit freeaboos say
Okay
Now this better
Also I can’t believe this aircraft almost be build
But it’s true
No way
There is no way that thing is structurally reliable
Essex, Centaur and Victorious after refits
I find TFX designs interesting though
to commemorate the event, anything interesting to know about musashi?
Musashi used no cemented armor
@spiral cedar how were the Yammies' guns' rpm?
As richel said. Yamato class used non cemented armor
War thunder is adding SMS Ostfriesland
I'm sorry Rich
Germans win again
I know
I think the fastest achieved reload was 28s, at normal engagement ranges 45s
Yikes
The official figure is 40s at max (45°) elevation
I'm the galloping ghost of the Japanese coast.
You don't hear of me and my crew.
But just ask any man off the coast of Japan
If he knows of the Trigger Maru.I look sleek and slender alongside my tender
With others like me at my side,
But we'll tell you a story of battle and glory,
As enemy waters we ride.I've been stuck on a rock, felt the depth charge's shock,
Been north to a place called Attu,
and I've sunk me two freighters atop the equator
Hot work, but the sea was cold blue.I've cruised close inshore and carried the war
to the Empire Island Honshu,
While they wire Yokohama I could see Fujiyama,
So I stayed, to admire the view.When we rigged to run silently, deeply I dived,
And within me the heat was terrific.
My men pouring sweat, silent and yet
Cursed me and the whole damned Pacific.Then destroyers came sounding and depth charges pounding
My submarine crew took the test.
Far in that far off land there are no friends on hand,
To answer a call of distress.I was blasted and shaken (some damage I've taken),
my hull bleeds and pipe lines do, too
I've come in from out there for machinery repair,
And a rest for me and my crew.I got by on cool nerve and in silence I served,
Though I took some hard knocks in return,
One propeller shaft sprung and my battery's done,
But the enemy ships I saw burn.I'm the galloping ghost of the Japanese coast,
You don't hear of me and my crew.
But just ask any man off the coast of Japan,
If he knows of the Trigger Maru.

Postwar USN analysis and Japanese survivor testimonies indicate that in her final battle (at the Sibuyan Sea), Musashi sustained 6 US aerial torpedoes without serious threat of sinking, and was eventually brought down by 4 additional torpedoes striking at about the same time
#OTD in 1944, USS Shangri-La was commissioned. One of the few Navy ships named for a fictional location, the name was chosen after FDR slyly told reporters that the Doolittle Raid had been launched from Shangri-La—the secret paradise in the novel "Lost Horizon".
There we go
She was also sponsored by Doolittle’s wife
FATO
Long cap
yes
see this?
It corresponds to this

also found information on French super long range guns tested in the late 20's
will get to you with it when I'm through the info
it includes a 5.3 caliber long 224mm shell
and a 5.0 caliber long 224mm shell that had a confirmed range of 127800 meters
Firing a shell on the 21st of November 1929 from Saint-Pierre-Quiberon to the bay of Audierne
it was fired by a 150 caliber gun
I'm pretty sure I've posted pics of it already
just not of the range it shot at
was one of a long list of long range artillery pieces france made to test hyper velocity ballistics
sadly finding any pictures of the shells will be near impossible unless I go dig in an archive

incredible what training your bloody people will do
More of a having time to get all the systems up and running correctly issue
I still don’t get what the Independence class was built to do
They were supposed to be multipurpose, and have different modules that could be changed out for different missions
also the navy was just bored
A lot about the LCS was also forced on the navy by OSD
Rumsfeld, damned be thy name
But, fundamentally it was this ship type that would somehow have to be light, cheap, and yet basically fill every task the higher-end elements of the fleet weren't going to be doing, plus ASW, and it also had to be able to do everything while operating in littoral enviroments. Oh, yes, and they wanted them to also go 40 knots on top of this.
They decided that all this could be achieved by mission modules that could be 'easily' swapped out based on the mission the ship was expected to perform.
Some of the concepts of the LCS may have worked out if they had offloaded many of the tasks onto another ship design, simply by designing an actual class of frigates to replace the OHPs, but that never happened.
So the entire thing became a mess, and then also most of the mission modules failed to appear when planned because they kept not funding their development, among other things.
The design requirements for the LCS also resulted in mission bays that quite simply were either too small, too light in load rating, or both (looking at you freedom class, independence at least has large bays!).
But yes, they wanted every capability for littoral warfare imaginable, on a 40+ kt ship, with at least 3000nmi range, and it had to have a small crew of ~50 along with small size and low cost.
They determined this could be done by looking at a ton of studies for various capabilities and seeing they had a (very small) window where they all overlapped. Of course, studies aren't totally accurate and the ships ended up impossible to build.
Freedom of course, was the bigger failure of the classes. Too undermanned, overweight, can't meet most KPPs even with all of the work poured into it. Actually delivered, loaded freedoms can't make 40 knots as they are too heavy to fully plane, and they can't get anywhere near the 3000nmi range requirement unless you cheat by burning all of the mission module's fuel (and even then it just barely creeps over the requirement).
nice
An SB2C damaged the barrels of Turret 1 during Sibuyan Sea. Musashi decided to open fire with her well-known Type 3 shells in anti aircraft defence. Said shell exploded in the barrel and forced the turret to be evacuated.
And if you're interested in tidbit details, Musashi differed visually from Yamato from details such as the type of shielded triple 25mm AA carried, main mast, and ladder arrangement.
Ain't also 127mms being non armored in Musashi on second floor
Wait. She had 25mms instead there?
Ooh
Musashi's hinoki deck was also stained with soot and tar to darken it against aircraft by Leyte Gulf.
Yeah it was the reason she was chocolate in KC
And for this...
So sad that I didnt find any good book to read about Musashi. So have to read about Rodney and her sistership lol
Brits actually planned on using oxygen 622-mm torps but at some point decided not to
Anatomy of the Ships - Yamato and Musashi by Skulski and Draminski
Capital Ships of the Imperial Japanese Navy, 1868–1945 The Yamato Class and Subsequent Planning by Lengerer
“Yamato” by Dickson, Warship International 1975 No.4 (p. 294-318)
“Loss of Yamato, Musashi, Taihou, Shinano” by the US Naval Technical Mission to Japan
I have a 900 pages book about japanese battleships but its in japanese
The first two are books so you’d have to get them yourself
But the second two are article PDFs so I sent them here
Yeah thanks, these ones are more about ship's deaths though
the best books on musashi and yamato are unfortunately in japanese
Just be a weeb
Is that…1906?
and also another model that can be set from 0 - 0.25 s

ye this is pre ww1 stuff
for railway guns sadly
the marine stuff seems to elude me
Ah
marine fuse should be in the range of 0.025-0.03s tho
What do railway guns need delay fuzes for anyway, bunker busting?
penetration into the ground
Yes but why
So bunkers
yes
0.25s is a long time…
yes
it's adjustable between 0 and 0.25s via a special wrench
same as in the navy but there the range is much smaller
I also found that long boy from yesterday
or atleast a newer version of it
oh ok its just 600
Probably has every minor detail but I am way too lazy to translate it somehow

HOOOW HOOOW
also found the SAP
but not really


I thought them as just faster Gangut shells
Damn
ok actually i won't make an HD model yet
Well I mean I have it too, I am just saying that kinda lazy to translate the most of the book to actually go on and read it
Would SU-10 satisfy you
The first prototype was completed and ready for flight tests when the OKB was among many shut down at that time and all work stopped. The Su-10 was sent to the Moscow Aviation Institute for use as an instructional airframe.

Also cursed fact
The more you research SU-10 the more cursed it gets
See what I mean?
It's that cursed that discord things design is NSFW
Sigh
Wonder if I can post other one
Yep I can post the six engine
And then there is this one
There was a British fighter with 2 jets as top
What was it's name
Ye
























