#history
1 messages · Page 11 of 1
in the helicopter the size of a house
and by house I mean the average American Mcmansion
Hey its not a Mi-26 
And like
People LOVE big stuff
Bv-238 was purchased for size memes mostly
the BV-238
has bombs
and enough self defense guns to make anything that attacks it to fuck off
the CH-53
is a flying bus unable to do anything
living with pain Ch-53 and Mi-26 will never come
yeah lemme airlift the HSTV-L into combat
Which means the USAF is soon to begin fielding a 300+ km, Mach 4+ air to surface missile which can be internally carried by F-35

Wait what if
You use Ch-53 to carry your ally tanks to flanks
With both passive and active radar seeking modes
and the two wiesels
Indeed. Perfect support vehicle
actually no you can't even airlift the HSTV-L
Like I also want recovery tanks so they can give repairs or performance boost to allies
the gimmick no one asked for
The early game Russian Mi-26 rush to B point
https://youtu.be/DRgkbImM-AM
This is one of the best scenes in Halo 3 in my opinion.
I feel such a rush would only work in like a 3rd world country
Ok what about V-12. She can carry Abrams for example?
o in top tier it would be funny as shit to watch
Just cause you can doesn't mean you should
but everyone involved in it is gonna be massacred
since these helicopters are massive targets
I assume they aren't all that maneuverable either
Empty weight: 69,100 kg (152,339 lb)
Gross weight: 97,000 kg (213,848 lb)
Max takeoff weight: 105,000 kg (231,485 lb)
Exactly. That's the fun part
Everyone would try to spawn as AA
Since they knew these girls coming
Wouldn't even need to be AA
Yeah anything can kill that
Under the constraints of the setting MGs and main guns would down most of them
Proximity fuse shells 
yeah
This sounds familiar

reacting the battle of Hostomel airport
fine. Guess I will search other games to use Mi-26
Or wait for custom mission to appear
eh if they ever make a gamemode that makes infantry a thing
transport helis and APCs would have a actual purpose
tho I doubt that's ever coming
Game companies really fail to understand the potential
They either focus on too much machines or infantry
I guess Arma tries to be both?
Arma is more a straight up milsim game

So it's going for something entirely different
arma is a meme
Oh christ please
Not the fucking Arma A-10
Got the angled tail fins too
Oh ye

I mean talking arma
Mi-26 Chinhook Fren
Tato
Was this a super clever joke
Since Nato reporting name of Mi-26 is Halo
See, if AL had Texas right now, imagine how much money they'd make from people buying rings today
Texas, Arkansas and Lorraine mini event when
the milf update
Neat
Have an event on Texas in Galveston
The live stream has some shikikans watching lol
Proceeds go to restoration
restorations also known as Texas wild hog hunting association adding Texas to their ranks in killing feral wild hogs
feral wild untamed hog boar
Europe finally produced a dinosaur bigger than 60 feet in total length


What unbuilt battleship projects that if finished theoretically would be the most powerful warship ever grace the blue ocean?
Jean Bart BBV
None because missiles exist
Battleship and most powerful warship ever can't be in the same sentence
Unless you count missile battleships

tea I read that

I know you do
Kentucky would of been the one with the actual ability game end a entire country
Tho you could also throw in nuclear shell Iowa
Couldn’t all Iowas use those shells?

So Kentucky could have them too with her missiles
Yeah
you wish you were right
USS Enterprise
especially with phaser banks
I don’t think that’s the most powerful warship tho
missile battleship
So basically modern Kirov Class
Cause like I personally would include nuclear subs which generally are just “end the world” fish
But even then, a modern destroyer with both better strike power and anti air capabilities is better
If we include nuclear in the mix then lmao
With no thought to the incongruity, GM2 Tooker trained the mount to port and awaited the order to fire on the oncoming target—Hiei.
But no such order arrived.
“I request permission to fire torpedoes." Hank immediately replied, "Permission not granted." He had received no authority from the flagship and apparently felt he could not yet take matters into his own hands. Crestfallen, Lieutenant (jg) Evins nevertheless ordered his director operator to keep his sights on the target; he knew he would receive the desired order in moments.
But no such order arrived.
Sterett's four 5-inch guns and eight torpedo tubes had been tracking the Japanese flagship since the first fire-direction radar contact, but to no avail without orders to open fire. Lieutenant Calhoun was straining his eyes for a direct glimpse of the Japanese behemoth when she finally loomed into view. Surely Sterett would break her rigorous silence now that the best target in the ocean was in plain sight.
But no such order arrived.
It was Spadone's experience that it would be impossible for the fourteen 5-inch guns Atlanta could train to port to miss any target only 2,000 yards away. Everyone in the U.S. column—and particularly everyone aboard the five leading warships, which all held ample targets in their sights—was awaiting Admiral Callaghan's order to commence firing.
But no such order arrived.
Kirov class mfers when you tell them that there are multiple sea skimming anti-ship missiles flying directly towards them and their decades old radar and combat coordination system has no chance of detecting and engaging them in time
Okay okay hear me out
Suppose there’s also full nuclear broadside Montana as a choice
Montana Class + Reagan era Retrofit program
Just load up a DDG with nuclear Tomahawks
no I’m going with Kentucky for having literal nuclear IRBMs
inb4 alt timeline where the Italians convert Impero's hull into a guided missile battleship with double-ended Talos and polaris tubes for shits and giggles
POV: you are Phoenix's psychiatrist looking at his brain scan
Giuseppe's big sis then
But seriously
Is there any big pepe guns for battleship larger than 20" at least in project only
TL where Australia converts HMAS Australia (1911) into a missile battlecruiser (removing her wing turrets in place of VLS)
TL when Germany went bonkers and putting 800mm Dora on a battleship
timeline where im happy
good luck fixing that keel
I want to mention Tallinn but she fared better than Amagi irl
but why Tallinn
No particular reason
i am in fact seething
that impact
kekw
explain to me again why the hell she lost to a raider even if said raider had 6 149.1 mm guns
“Attack effectively first”
extremely short range
First mover advantage
Lost to armed merchant ship
the first few German salvos likely wiped out a large portion of the crew


as a result Sydneys ability to respond was hampered as she dealt with multiple fires, a decimated crew, at least 1 knocked out turret and attempting to increase the range
I can imagine this was like L'Audacieux when she suddenly turned up in front of HMAS Australia
her amour was almost entirely ineffective at such ranges and her fire control advantage was moot
getting jumped is never fun

even despite that she managed to land a number of crippling blows on the Kormoran, only to take a torpedo hit that would ultimately doom her
if it weren't for the decimated crew she probably could have survived

other ships of similar size took similar levels of damage, and survived, but they had enough crewmen to deal with flooding and fires
Sydney simply didn't
losing her bow was survivable, but she was simply so short on crew that they couldn't close the forward bulkheads and pump out the flooding
still very big oof
and even despite all that she was still trying to make it home, staying afloat for at least 6 hours before finally going down
she likely sank at some point after midnight and before dawn although the exact time will never be known
it is however clear that she had engine power and was trying to make it home
was she hit under the waterline?
not sure i'll have to check the damage report which i dont have access to right now
According to wiki, german crew aimed for below waterline after taking out the turret
i dont have wifi it would take hours to download
quite honestly im not sure how trustworthy the German account is
The Germans could probably not believe their luck anyway
again, the post-war report written by the RAN published about 5 years ago details basically every hit on the ship they could find
Has to be said, regardless of the range that turret wasn't going to resist a hit
but i dont have it rn
To trade evenly in that scenario was already a major success
the Germans got immensely lucky thanks to complacency and poor decision making on the part of Sydney's captain
Ah now this reminds me of Battle of Sunda Strait
here @desert agate
I mean, with only a 25mm faceplate, even destroyer SAP is going to penetrate that at combat ranges
I actually get a 404 when I click on the link
Ah
So doesn't seem to be available atm anyways
but yeah no one was seriously expecting a German raider to pop up off the isolated North-Western Australian coastline
Website restructuring
Agano can get pounced on by most DD's at 15ish km

Every IJN cruiser has turret faces just as vulnerable as a Leander :p
Unlike German U-boats that frequently visits Jakarta or Singapore, no one expects German surface ship made as far as Western Australia
I mean, yeah, there's that too
the area is simply devoid of shipping traffic
the posting only really existed as a stepping stone for rotation to the Med, as ships would go to East Coast for refit/repair, Fremantle/Western Coast defence, Med and then back again
I just remembered that USS Houston is hella lucky avoiding torpedoes fired from IJN destroyers and the torps sank their own troop transport ships instead
and Fremantle wasn't seriously under threat until the Japanese came knocking a mere 3 weeks later
The Germans who have been involved ... [in 'harassment' from those seeking 'the truth'] have developed a great contempt for the mean- spiritedness of those Australians who are not mature enough to accept an unpalatable truth (namely, that the captain of Sydney blundered), and who therefore seek to blackguard others.
Can a single AGM-84 Harpoon sink a WW2 Era BB (Iowa Class BBs) 
Mogami: destroys 4 IJA transports and an auxiliary ship with one 6-torp spread that missed the target
Also Mogami: It was Fubuki, Fubuki did it
it wasn't until the Japanese began their Southern thrust that Fremantle was determined to have been under sufficient threat to put a permanent posting there, that being the obsolete HMAS Adelaide

From a single Harpoon? Unlikely, though a mission-kill is quite possible

Unlikely, she's built to endure severe punishments

If you had time to swap out your Harpoon's warhead for something designed to penetrate armor, then you might raise the chances of doing something nasty to someone's magazines, but otherwise it's using an SAP-HE warhead of about 220 kg
Which is still nasty as hell, just, unless you can get it into a magazine, not liable to sink the ship in one hit

So one isn’t enough eh?
How about 5 
Japan's new Aegis equipped ship will have a standard displacement of 20k tons
Too much?
USS Langley delivered P-40 fighters to the defence of Dutch East Indies but before she arrived at Cilacap port in Java, she was bombed by Japanese medium bombers and had to be scuttled afterwards
you've likely increased the small chance by somewhat more than 5 times
but the question is
why
ugh… you want to sink the ship 
no
I mean, do we have to limit ourselves to Harpoons?
Chances are launching five at an Iowa will gurantee a mission kill, though, again, sinking it is very much up to chance and less likely with your typical Harpoon. They're just not meant to take down targets of that size and degree of protection
There are plenty of larger missiles, however, that are meant to take on large surface targets, where you can fit them with warheads that both create one hell of a bang and can also penetrate >1 meter of steel
And those kinds of missiles absolutely have the ability to sink an Iowa in 1-2 hits, though if they do so is still going to be somewhat up to chance as to where they hit
Admiral Nakhimov is getting refit at least 
Should get new radars as well
Operating from the aircraft carriers Yorktown, Independence, and the Essex, nine aircraft strike groups attack the Imperial Japanese garrison and airfield on the small coral atoll of Minami Tori Shima, also known as Marcus Island. The Hellcat takes part in this attack but it does not score any aerial victories on this particular raid. Still, it is an impressive display and this combat mission comes only a mere 18 months after the prototype stage, and production of the easy to build fighter is in full swing.
Originally the design of the F6F was meant to improve on the F4F, but as the design process unfolds it becomes an entirely different aircraft sharing no parts with its predecessor. It boasts a powerful 2,000 horsepower 18-cylinder radial piston engine, heavy armour, a self-sealing fuel tank, and an impressive armament of six .50 caliber Browning M3 machine guns. It also has a load capacity of 2,000 pounds to carry bombs or unguided high velocity rockets to provide support to soldiers on the ground.
On top of all of this, it is also an aircraft that is fairly easy to become proficient in during a short amount of time. This is ideal for an air force rapidly expanding in size and recruiting new pilots left and right. Lieutenant Will Carroll recalls his first flight in an F6F back on 15 April: “There was no instructor. At runway’s end, you were cleared for takeoff. You pushed the throttle forward and the airplane threw your head against the headrest. That’s the kind of plane it was.”
All in all, from a production and performance standpoint the F6F Hellcat shows an enormous amount of promise.
Photo: Lieutenant Commander Flatley’s F6F Hellcat on the deck of the USS Yorktown warming for the attack on Marcus Island, 31 August 1943
Source: US Navy```
Lucky that Japan couldn't build enough N1Ks to counter her better
it's good ye
This picture is actually from 4 months ago
Didn’t the captain blame Houston
Despite her not having torps
Someone did yeh
take my money
@spring briar Fren 
Here better 

Dis one is 406mm



oh dear
is .280 Brit still around or did .556 kill it entirely?
Huh
Didn't knew they were still using it
Interesting
So i need help with something
I'm trying to make a consultation on the archives of The Milwaukee Journal
Specifically in the edition of November 26th, 1934
The link to google News is only giving me the 404 error
And the link in Wikipedia redirects me to Wayback Machine
It keeps loading forever
The only thing i found is like
A consultation at the MPL (Milwaukee Public Library)
But it seems to be something to do in person
And... it seems to be paid?
Still using those old 100mm guns

Still using that old turtleback
Not sure if I'd call it old, since they basically got back to it after going in a circle through other options
Maybe shouldn't have gone with those requirements

Even little sacrifices could've allowed for stuff like steeply inclined belts
But, wasn't allowed
At least I can still pat the long 105s


Hell no
To the no no nooooo
Look, French smol with 105s
The extend of those rebuilds be like, why not just build a new ship?
Moving the entire main battery into a superfiring arrangement
That's expensive
You basically have to redo the entire citadel for that
Perhaps
It makes my Scharnhorst upgrade look like a sunday afternoon job
Soyuz with
Gas Turbine
British Cemented for side armor
Class B for horizontal armor
40/70 bofors in a sextuple mount
Twin 57mm bofors on top of turrets
Italian dual purpose 135mm/45 as secondaries
American radars 


Actually nvm could be problematic with gas Turbine
That is IF they actually changed anything
I mean
He is right Rich. There is a reason why most of this kind of refits don't go through
I can’t say until I see what they actually did
I think Stalingrad's missile conversion plan was damn expensive as well. So might as well build more Sverdlovs instead
You have to cut large holes into the decks, seal them elsewhere, fit magazines where there were none, move whatever was in there before into the now empty spots, probably rearrange the machinery now that you got room, and fit the structural support for the freshly placed barbettes and turrets
Basement in Saint Petersburg museum.
Wonder why they don't show it in museum but thrown into basement instead 
Again, that would be a headache if they actually did all of that
I was specifically referring to this one
And you need to do those changes, unless you plan on slapping the turrets onto the deck without a direct line to the magazines
Which would be an equally big ???
Nono

What about dis
Of you prefer dis?

My main gripe is the turret move
Off memory I cannot come up with dreadnought+ getting an entire turret moved like that
Removing a turret, sure
But taking it off of the deck and reattaching it like lego? No
Especially with all them boilers everywhere on that ship
use the main engines from the Italian light cruiser "Eugenio di Savoia" with a capacity of 2×55,000 hp.
If you insist, you can salvage the turrets and reuse them
Now I'm not sure if this was always the case tho

rips it out
Mine now
The Italian refits of the Dorias are probably the closest to this
And even then, not as extensive
And were already deemed way too expensive to refit
happy dunkeke noises

Italians just went right for the money without a smol bb
Bubov boy
Vanguard 

Former USS Mississippi (BB-41) as a training ship (AG-128)
medium is premium 
though those aft launchers? makes her look like she went on a very strict diet 
two Sea Slug SAM launchers were mounted, each with three missiles
76mm/60 Mark 6 secondaries
40mm Mark 4 AA mounts
type-965M radar mounted on the aft mast-tube
Type 278 and 974 at front.
Two type 901 to guide those launchers
Sea slug was ass
British moment I guess 
yeh I'm so used seeing the 15 inchers big British BBs with 8 turrets so that's my first impression 
and agreed with Richie, Slugs don't even compare to Tomahawks that Mo carried 
And of course Sea Cat anti-aircraft missile system
Ok what about
During 1980s
She will change 40mms with Goalkeeper ciws
Sea slugs with Sea Wolf launchers
And slap Sea Eagle anti ship launchers
Nevada refit

I have seen things you people wouldn't believe 
Can cursed ships be posted here or they have to be somewhat historical? 
sometimes I do wonder what the power and propulsion boys are smoking, pun intended.
basically as long as it has historical basis in her, she's fair game
Yes. But try to be let's say more original
Like not the typical H-45 or Habakkuk spam
I see thx
Hmm
You know I never learned if this was offical or not
But it's the only Soviet Battleship I ever called ugly


Seen this thing plenty of times on yandex
Biggest sin is the front funnel

Not sure who looks worse Nelson or the G3
Yeah
Weird thing my beloved


at least the Proyect J3 looks more normal
I also favor Nelson over G3
🤝



Your brain on WOWS gunnery



Iirc this is an ancient forum post
By God Tengu himself
Literally who
There’s someone malding in my DMs 
He’s saying that i’m a “Salty Shitcat” Fanboy and that a Mig-17 can shoot down an F-14 
Lmao?
sure buddy let's get you to gulag
Also ed
wat
I can’t confirm nor deny that allegation
Po-2 is still the only biplane with F-94 kill 
Swordfish only biplane with BB kill
Just like how the CIA says it

would the anti ship bombing test of mitchell count as a bb being sunk by biplanes
Against oldenburg?
against indiana
Let’s change to combat kills then

🌭
🥖 

What happens if your Aim-54 accidentally tracks a ship and slams into it 

Sudden loss of career
How would that happen
Also you sure he said mig-17 and not mig-27
Yes he said Mig-17
Mig-17: Let me solo her 
Miggen ring
Rich
Is it true French had difficulty on mass producing good armor
So used inferior armor in 1930s
In the early to mid 1920’s for warships yes
No wonder F-18 overtook her
Hornet and Phantom look better than Tomcat imo
And F-111
Why u ask

F-14 over F-111 personally

🚪


Time to search up some Bismarck
How original
Its all Azur Lane 
Who’s the most capable Iowa of the 4?

F-111 supremacy
Aardvark boy
New Jersey or Wisconsin
I’m trying to learn about the ship and its capability. Only problem is that every search result is AL related
Ed you ok
Ed is in denial
I see a fellow VARK enjoyer 
smol Texas
I’ve heard of stories that F-14As can split throttle. Can F-14Bs and Ds do the same?
...
I actually wonder if there's multi engine aircraft that can't split throttle
I thought you can’t because the Bs and Ds use F110s and not TF-30s
Brainfart moment 
Consult ze German archives, you'll find most of what you seek there

Also Wikipedia is a thing
How off were speculative ship performance (measured in training) compared to actual performance (like loading rate, speed seaworthiness, etc.) on ww2 ships?
How did it vary between nations?
well he "was" a massive bisko simp so

I dislike betrayers
Hope he doesn't leave Vanguard for Yamato months later
training is a factor, but you'd also have to account for equipment malfunctions and other unforseen factors
cough shell jammed in gun cough propellant charge broke and requiring 30 minutes of cleanup cough seawater entering your barrel, flooding your mags or just outright destroying the barrel
referring to bisk?
(Common issue for most nations, Richelieu, Renown at Lofoten, Littorio at Sirte)
Stuff like rate of fire in practical terms often depends on doctrine over sheer technical limits, particularly as you extend the range
In gun fights beyond 20,000 meters you will rarely see battleship guns use rates of fire greater than 1 rpm
The salvo rate is what might hit 2 rounds or more per limit
something something the Royal Navy believing that their long service requirements will make the guns fire faster so 10 guns is OK on KGV
First Sea Lord (Chatfield) opted for this ten-gun design on the grounds that the greater efficiency of the Royal Navy (due to its unusual long-service system) ‘will enable us to fire quicker and more accurately than our foe even if we have slightly fewer guns; but no efficiency or courage will save the ship if she is insufficiently protected and is put out of action’.
Thank you, Sir Chatfield
A 203mm is more likely to sustain 2-3 rpm, and a 152mm, 4-5 rpm
you scuffed up that design, let's be honest
Didn't US had same problem with their 356mm
Or maybe German 283mm was too large again
Yeah I'm aware
But 356mm also looks cramped 
The USN encountered the same issue with dispersion, but not the turret itself being too cramped to operate
Being that it was designed as a triple turret from the start
Yeah like it reminds me of 180mm by the looks
Rather than what the Soviets did, which is try to stick a third gun in a twin turret design

Just because of tight grouping doesn't exactly mean it is cramped
Just like how the Italians squeeze the guns together on a common cradle on their CAs
i see. cool
MK-1-180 single mount
Designed: 6 round per minute
Practical: 4 round per minute

MK-3-180 triple mount
Designed: Designed: 6 rounds per minute
Trials: 5.5 rounds per minute
Practical: 2 rounds per minute

Could be worse, sorry Riche, have to shit on the ACAD 37 for a bit here
Super high RPM
Barrel: I die
The Modèle 1925 was a single gun mount while the later Modèle 1933 was a twin mount. Both were hand-loaded, semi-automatic guns with a low rate of fire compared to their clip-fed contemporaries. A combination of low rate of fire, low projectile weight and small numbers of guns per ship led to a reputation of it being a poor anti-aircraft weapon
Well, with two/twin you can always work the gun from outside and use however much space you want for that.
With triple you always have problem with center gun. you can't increase its working space without extending barrel baseline
Gotta play the devil's advocate sometimes.
Why they put this thing on Richel wtf
Barrel die before shootdown of plen would statistically occur
When the choice is bad medium AA or no medium AA
You choose former
Unless you are Japanese
Imagine if they got Bofors instead French 
Then, no medium AA, and act surprised when your small AA can't fill in for medium AA
Mm, due to the delays with the 37mm ACAD they were forced to make do with the older 37mm up to the war (worth noting that they originally wanted to use the ACAD on the Dunkerque-class, adding it to the design in February 1935)
Enough to arm the entire fleet, who'll even manufacture that?
No I guess 
Reverse engineering seems to have been a bad option
Given the rather sad attempts they made during the war to get those Bofors going
Damn
The original 40mm Bofors, it has to be noted, was a solid AA gun but also not a great design
The Americans entirely re-designed it before they mass-produced it, as it quite literally couldn't be mass-produced to the orignal Swedish design
For the nippon steel folded 100 times crowd it would sound good though
Pretty much, yeah
t should be noted that the USN considered the original Bofors Model 1936 design to be completely unsuitable for the mass production techniques required for the vast number of guns needed to equip the ships of the US Navy. First, the Swedish guns were designed using metric measurement units, a system all but unknown in the USA at that time. Worse still, the dimensioning on the Swedish drawings often did not match the actual measurements taken of the weapons. Secondly, the Swedish guns required a great deal of hand work in order to make the finished weapon. For example, Swedish blueprints had many notes on them such as "file to fit at assembly" and "drill to fit at assembly," all of which took much production time in order to implement - there is a story that one USA production engineer remarked that the Bofors gun had been designed so as to eliminate the unemployment problems of the Great Depression. Third, the Swedish mountings were manually worked, while the USN required power-worked mountings in order to attain the fast elevation and training speeds necessary to engage modern aircraft. Fourth, the Swedish twin gun mounting supplied to the USA for evaluation was air-cooled, limiting its ability to fire long bursts, a necessity for most naval AA engagements. Finally, the USN rejected the Swedish ammunition design, as it was not boresafe, the fuze was found to be too sensitive for normal shipboard use and its overall design was determined to be unsuitable for mass production.
For ammunition, the fuze designed and produced in Britain was adopted as an interim measure by the USA, but this was considered to be of an unsafe design and unsuitable for mass production techniques. Fortunately, this fuze was almost immediately replaced by one designed by R.L. Graumann of the Naval Ordnance Laboratory. This fuze was simple in design and "ideally suited to mass production." The new fuze, designated as the Mark 27, was found to be 99.9 percent efficient in ballistic acceptance tests, a record not equaled by any other fuze of the time. Both the US Army and the British adopted this fuze for their own production lines. The USN estimated that the adoption of the Mark 27 saved some $250,000,000 during the war.
Thank you, Pretz
Metric is non negotiable
One day 
the 37 mm acad gives me so many questions
only 600 rounds barrel life with 3000 kg/cm² pressure and 825 mps mv
I honestly find it mystifying
There must have been something different about the barrel construction
Because otherwise it would be quite reasonable to assume a 4,000-8,000 round barrel life from such a gun, just based on the ballistics
Soviet single 37mm 70-k was air cooled. So had 150 practical rpm with 1.500 round barrel life.
Twin barrel 66-K, and quad barrel 46k(for Kronshtadt, Soyuz etc) were water cooler. But invasion ruined their development, only build 46k was put on Okto.
Tho later V-11 appeared as twin 37mm mount. And Soviets used that one till 1955
And V-11 is also water of course 
inb4 it's French 1920 bad steel industry problem again
For the French to get a figure as low as 600 EFC is another matter
Please don't kill me
The article specifies 600 rounds with all possible metallurgy efforts so????
40mm bofors had 80-90 practical.
Why 37mm with 150 is bad 
I was referring to the barrel life, not the rate of fire
Ah 
Either one of the data points shows on navweaps is wrong or france is using mild steel or smth
37-40mm guns of this era usually vary from 5,000 to 10,000 rounds
This task falls to you now that you have graduated
go forth and seek us the answer

This could also be fully due to not cooling
Since very long continuous bursts were fired through it
And normally effective barrel life is now measured like that
Air cooling lowers it like Soviet one
Did it use air cooling
Since Soviets gain 500 more barrel shots by passing to water
I think the French were investigating into water cooling by the time of Fall of France?
and generally other methods to extend barrel life.
ACAD was air cooled, they were planning on exploring water cooling prior to the armistice
the 37mm acad data on navweaps seems to be based on continuous fire
can't say what it is for other 37mm guns
but with ~8000 rounds of barrel life?
once again licking a cactus here

I mean, do we even know for sure what ammo was used for ACAD?
not exactly
usually barrel life is correlated to chamber pressure
but it is only slightly higher than that of eg. german 37mm guns
which have in the region of 8000 round barrel lives

Which German 37?
I'd assume excessive RoF hurt the barrel life as well
Also day 462 of navweaps giving wrong RoF figures for the German 37mm M42
But what do primary sources know anyway...?
only at extreme ranges (near range limit) in the /50, and they were easily rectified in modifications to the guns, the turret worked well, as did the /45 as a whole
(which is the turret pictured)
the turrets were not considered cramped in fact, but the ships rather luxurious and comfortable

Damn
Ah Project 1123
She turned to Moskva class later
this really is some red alert shit
Literally 2 ship hulls welded together. They do love their double-hulled subs though
What if catamaran
They turn into an LCS and get grounded indefinitely like the Liberty class
chonk subs cool and good
do you not like the o b e l i s k
14,000 ton displacement chocker subs
That bridge is like if Yamashiro became a Zumwalt
It ain’t a SUPERstructure for nothing
Same energy
Not entirely, if you ask me. The fighting tem's going to meet her maker;Texas's just getting a checkup.
Or is she 
But, since we're on the topic...
Mate, Texas is not getting scrapped.
If she is, it'd be quite the shame, since the last surviving (super) dreadnought would be gone.
I dont think she's reaching Olympia/Orleck level bad.
Nor parked in a shit spot like Fr*nce did with Colbert.
IJN Texas
state literally just spent 35 million on repairs
she’s getting scrapped
Sure buddy
the US has done goofier shit, even if I doubt it
Texas has done immeasurably goofier shit
Even so, with the amount of public hype around her moving it’s totally infeasible for them to just decide to scrap her
Unless they discover that the ship’s structural interior is actually supremely fucked
It’s also owned by the state of Texas
Iirc at least
I don’t think they’d let that happen ever
Well
About that, i ended discovered this: 
So it seems i'll have no access to that newspaper
Since it's only available at the Milwaukee Public Library
And seems you have to pay to go in there (like, a fee for consultation)


Why he would be banned for that? 
See: Sanglune
Weird thing is
Sang can easily come back through an appeal
Since it was rather very odd ban indeed
Can explain that he was trying to show the Plymouth's content as the older Edinburgh class design
I guess he doesn't want to appeal
Shitzig
Hand it over
That thing
Your HD model
For my lady Soyuz
i forgot leip wasnt in wows honestly
Nurn is in it already so no real reason
leip has a funnier sounding name though
let'spig for wows
the sisters of nortburger and letspig
hotdog bote
born of the wiener republic

sounds like a noble and based country, what comes after can't possibly be that good
the downfall from hotdogism to
looks at notes
yeah this thing
see the weiner republic knew how to make boats
the notes are a mile long
boat made in weiner republic

maka gets me, even in these trying times
Reich stole my Soyuz from me 
wasn't only Deutschland made in the wiener repubic
or are you just referring to the design of the class
in which case
yes
wiener ships better
the stank reich can only pretend to grasp the greatness of the doucheland class
the prowess of those that lived in a hot dog country could not be grasped by their descendents who had lost the art of dog
true
All three were laid down by the Weimar republic
super good ships come from those countries, can't explain that

Ich Sehe
Danke firebirdo

Clearly wiener republic is better than sauerkraut reich

the world would be so much better with Lorraine, Le Hardi, Suffren and Duquesne were in any game
We have Lorraine 40t in a land ship game

i have now been informed of froggo trailer
watching that directly after the new top gun is wild
@tough quail could I have the source for the panthers getting skullfucked by Stuarts at Kursk
Danke
The heavy losses were in part due to improper use of the tank. The Panther had a very tough front, but the sides were no problem at all for 76 mm guns or higher. The Panthers took heavy losses from flanking fire. There were cases of Panthers being knocked out by even lighter weapons. In one of the battles in the evening of July 5th, a group of 7 Lend Lease M3 light tanks managed to knock out 5 Panthers, losing only 2 of their own.
Skill issue
"Entrance of the Gladiators" op. 68 or "Entry of the Gladiators" is a military march composed in 1897 by the Czech composer Julius Fučík.
a reminder that this is a marching theme for the austro hungarian army
oddly appropriate

HAH
Turkey getting their T-129
In WT
With CIRIT missiles
Laser guided interesting
10km range
For Italy of course
Good news?
French did get Mirage 2000
Bad news?
No navy news still
Here is Alaska AP
Seems reasonable
One sec
Yeah looks fine
Hey krem can you get me the WT 305’s from Kronshtadt and Gangut too please
I just found out that this North Korean shitbucket has a longer range then the Schwerer Gustav. further adding proof that if North Korea were to be isekai'd to 1940 they'd be able to beat Nazi germany without nukes
true plus the M-1987 Koksan (rustbucket in picture) uses rocket assisted shells to achive it's longer range
Yeah but it has ass dispersion
it only really exists to indiscriminately shell south Korean back line in the hope to actually hit something important
Pretty much, North Korean artiliery doctrine is just "point at Seoul and fire"
Any RAP without guidance bounds to have terrible dispersion tbf
gyrojet moment
Because it sounds like circus music at 0:16?
Alright let's see
Here Kron
And here Kommuna
RN Eugenio di Savoia — 5.3 => 5.7 (RB)
Kerch — 5.0 => 5.3 (RB)
I swear to god gaijin
Didn't top tier ships become 7.0 as well
yes
but those 2
are the SAME SHIP
actually, the Kerch gets higher secondary ROF thanks to sekrit documentz
Are both of them Prem? 
Exactly
Kronshtadt shells feels like Gangut shell but fires at faster velocity
5.5" gun taken from Almirante Oquendo after the Battle of Santiago de Cuba. The hit is probably a 6-pounder or 4" shell from USS Iowa (BB-4)

Sounds like skill issue


seems sus
when even normal documents are sus, sekrit ones are just entertainment
The only documents you can trust these days are the ones on wt forums
stolen right from a countries national archives
TOP SECRET
WT players: "that sign won't stop me because i can't read!"
well I mean
it was also made after
Type 055 DDG 102 ‘Lhasa’
Gawd she is so clean 
Wish they keep the yellow deck instead painting over it
looks fake
there were guns made before 1920 that had 3 times the range
but ok

healthy mentality
Thanks to Established Titles for sponsoring today's video. They are now running a Labor Day Sale! Go to https://establishedtitles.com/THEOPERATIONSROOM to get an additional 10% off on any purchase with code THEOPERATIONSROOM
A convoy sets sail for the Soviet Union. The feared convoy raider Scharnhorst comes out of the Norwegian Fjords to hunt,...
Operations Room 
I couldn’t believe that the Tomcats managed to keep up with the Top Secret MiG-28s
https://youtu.be/X7HOOLd_Sto
13th May 1986 - the USS Enterprise is rushed to the Indian Ocean to provide air support to the rescue of a communications relay ship that is adrift in enemy territorial waters. F-14 Tomcats are scrambled to face the deadly new enemy fighter, the MiG-28. Very few have seen it close before, and faulty intelligence ill-prepares the pilots for a sho...
In this I ask the curator of the Tank Museum at Bovington David Willey what he thinks is the most underrated British Tank of the Second World War.
Cover design by vonKickass.
Disclaimer: I was invited by the Tank Museum at Bovington in 2022.
https://www.youtube.com/c/thetankmuseum/
https://tankmuseum.org/
»» GET OUR BOOKS ««
» Stukabook - Doc...
tfw you attack an enemy who thinks the war is over and wasn't even at their positions and take crippling losses
feelssovietman
Caring safety of your allies 
Buddy, if you think telling someone to take hostages is a sign of care… 
FeelsTarawaMan
"Its just business"
Some rich British Captain
qwerty already reposting my stuff, lol
I'm just wondering how your inflection when you say 'teacher' would sound like
lewd


I would if she wore a Native American warrior outfit like in wows
God it looks so cool
true, I use that skin
Anyways when do we get biblically accurate anchorage
I want a version of her with like 500 floating eyes around her
anchorage, with 500 eyes, she can see russia from her house
Where is my premium T6 Lorraine
ijn izumo raising the us flag to enter a us port after searching for german submarines
wouldn't lorraine be t5?
Lorraine had pretty decent AA and was generally upgraded compared to the Bretagnes
but had a gun less so T5 is possible too
could make a full dragoon div
yeh
sadly have to substitute oklahoma
since nevada is not in the game but oklahoma is
tru
Lorraine and her gf Nevada vs Yamato
with the power of friendship
with the power of underwater shells
and ice cream
(did nevada have an icecream machine?)
probably
we just need to magic texas up to t6 with some funny gimmick so we can run them with warspite too
'the 3''/50 dp is now considered a long range aa mount, deck armor is now accurate'
Gone smexual
gone right
Texas ‘22
She can make a dry dock whenever she wants
tiers are honestly kinda easy to bs whenever you remember how poor some of them are
like how musashi and h39 are the same tier
Yeah I mean
Tromp tier X
or hipper being t8
Tier 10 large DDs are just tier 3 cruisers?
Always has been































