#history
1 messages · Page 8 of 1
Considering it’s performance in the conflict we can’t talk about yes
I mean shoot and scoot and still be done by SPGs, and arguably it’s ideal to have most of the artillery fleet be capable of it
any near peer conflict will likely be against a enemy with a large artillery army with plenty of capability to counter battery
They did show M777 in Army 2022 Expo. But Caesar wasn't around. So I assume 777 is more impressive. Or they didn't got one yet
I can’t talk about that here beyond no Caesar has been lost in combat in any theater or war

m777 is also a tad older and is a product of the US so no wonder you see it a bit more often?
And US has more money to mass produce them
It was one of the destroyed ones that got captured and painted up to look intact
enough about that
Then they did good work since it looks damn clean
generally put standard towed guns are far more vulnerable to platforms like Caesar due to taking much longer to become mobile
While centrally a role will remain for towed guns and I don’t think they should obviously be totally phased out
assuming something comes out of the shoot off
it will hopefully be the ideal direction forward for artillery branch
NATO standardization and no point in anything bigger
Soviets tried 406mm and 420mm but well its not very effective
ERCA is already gonna have a shell able to reach out to 100 KMs
No way, they'd rather use excalibur than increasing caliber
yeah
Tfw no 210mm again for US 
I mean
I do love M110 and a modernized M110 would be dope but
no real point
again NATO standardization
Army only has to play with two artillery calibers
that's fully interchangeable with the rest of NATO
I don't think 105 is still in widespread use
I'd have to double check but I believe infantry brigades use it standard
155 is a nice caliber
yeah
every infantry brigade combat team has 2 M119 batteries and a 777 battery
so even if something likely Caesar gets widely adopted and displaces 777 in the mainline army Infantry units would still have heli transportable artillery
hell pretty sure Hawkeye is meant to be heli transportable
I like Boxer
forgot the name of that system but if I remember correctly
turrets fully remote operated
has a surprising amount of ammo in it
tho considering PZH-2000s daily limit of 100 rounds a day
I doubt its reliability
caesar with da screw breech
Yeah...that one was surprising
I mean its German its not surprising
German engineering
somehow its not barrel ware that gets them
its the autoloader breaking if you go beyond 100 rounds a day continously

since apparently the PZH-2000 wasn't ever gonna get into a shooting war?
Dutch PzH went to Iraq FOB I think
I wasn't counting war on terror
Tho yeah, not high intensity, and mostly static
I was referring to high intensity you need to be sustainably flinging shells with the threat of counter battery yeah
yeah
barrel ware is something reasonable to expect and shouldn't really happen after a few weeks of firing
tho that 100 round a day limit is just not gonna survive any intense combat situation

Wonder if Leo 2 has a problem like this
Where it will only appear in a real conflict
didn't you see what happened to the Turkish leo 2s
Isn't that like Saudi Abrams. Where problem was more of how they used it
I mean if the abrams got hit in the same spot the Turkish ones did it wouldn't of been turret popped
Yeah...
I mean leclerc has a similar issue but its frontal ammo storage is more protected than Leopards
probably because leclercs were barely used
Lmao do you still believe the bullshit about the "sold" or "captured" Caesars and Himars
Why
They prefer using Abrams because?
Saudi Arabia was the main armored force
Ah
Well... looking at ARMY 2022, aside with the trophy room.
Its pretty meh all round.

I'm just in love with the new submarine 
that supposed new "Stealth" sub was it?

also pantsir will always be ass no matter how many missiles they put on the thing
With new propulsion and a drone submarine hangar 
Yeah that thing needs a rework 
thing getting smacked by basic drones
Does it need better radar or a jammer
no most of its issues likely boil down to lack of automation
main flaw with most Russian air defense systems is user fatigue and lack of proper automation
operators tend to slip up when there staring at a radar screen for hours on end
US for its naval and air defense systems have a high degree of automation in their operation
while I'm not quite sure on the specifics
Smoothtauro

Perfect for cooking egg
The Navy wants to shed 39 ships in Fiscal Year 2023, with the first ship set to depart on Halloween. The list, which includes five guided-missile cruisers and nine Littoral Combat Ships, was released Friday as an administrative message. However, the composition of the final list is far from a done deal. Included on the …
39 
How many US builds per year
seems to be mainly
LCSs and older resupply vessels
tho the Ticons seem to be towards the end of their service life sadly

Useless to keep ships in service if you can't deploy them
They're also big manpower sinks
There are more important things than just comparing raw VLS counts
Though congress seems to really struggle with that last part
But future 2045 force calls for a fleet of 373 manned ships
This thing doesnt make sense
At least the older soviet carrier models tried to copy the west
I need to brace myself for armchair generals here wanting those 39 ships
What the fuck is this
Although i'm almost sure there will be mostly people refusing that
And what's your point?
373 manned ships should be partially made up of non-operable ships glued to a pier?
The Tico's are going to be long gone by the time we get to the force level desired by that plan
So will much of the Flight I Burke's
DDG(X) is likely going to have Ticon levels of firepower regardless without the crew requirements
in terms of vessels again the LCSs and Ticons aren't long for this world
So I’ve reread this in detail now
And basically
Someone shoot me
LCSs were built for a world that never existed and got wrapped up in bad contracts that made maintaining them stupidly expensive
and Ticons are getting to their sell by date
More likely than not a decent number of the LCS's will stick around for the sake of MCM duties and generic patrols against pirates or the like
Not a lot but not a few either
there building like 50+ Constellations
At literally any piece of german equipment: “too advanced for its time”
if a LCS is gonna be as expensive as a Burke to run you might as well task a Constellation to anti pirate duties
unironically believes H-44
Me, a Le Fantasque connoisseur: “too advanced for its time”
The plan called for 56 Small Surface Combatants, not Constellations specifically. Though the Connies will certainly be the vast majority of those
At least 40
Wait this is the first time I’ve actually read more
It’s so bad…
800mm guns as rainbow gear
Depends on how many Independence's they junk, most likely
I mean considering the issues with the Independences
Since those are more likely to be kept than the Freedoms (which have had the vast majority of issues)
honestly they probably scrapped the wrong class considering the hull structural issues the Independences have
¯_(ツ)_/¯
Reminder that the first version of that garbage had 45

He also states “Scharnhorst scored a longer hit than warspite”
Source^
Oh god he included the 533
You know, the one thing I appreciate about people like that using KMS as a prefix for German ships
Source: “I did it in wows once but I lost the replay”
Is that I read it every time as 'Kill MySelf U-XXX'
Aye fuck you

'The most successful KillMySelf...'
Scharns shot on Glorious was pretty fucking far
I mean, it was, but it's considered pretty much the same distance as the hit Warspite achieved
Granted, it was a clean hit, unlike Warspite's, but Scharn also had a much bigger target to shoot at
I can live with that richy
though Montecuccoli tagging a minesweeper at 21 km with a 6" shell is arguably a much more impressive shot
personally regarding the LCS issue they might as well just put on a completion for a corvette that will hopefully solve the LCS design issues while being a more affordable small surface combatant
Warspite vs Scharnhorst hits debates
Italian cruisers long range hits on smaller targets
More like
Honestly it's less that the navy wants new ships for that job and more that they just want to find a use for the hulls they've already bought
But for the yards that were working on them, they either want them building FREMM or working on something else
shooting at a helpless carrier
shooting at your allies

mochi
I need to make a list like that but for the MN

And add Fritz X because stolen guidance system
That’d actually be handy bc I know jack about the MN
The worst thing is he just adds non navy related stuff to the list
There are many Carrier designs going around. I personally think Lamantin is best option here. Using Ulyanovsk carrier as basis but modern rework.
germany must be erased
Yes
Do you know of any good accounts of that battle? Most accounts I've read have credited the hits on Australia to one of the light crusiers present
But I don't really have anything that focuses specifically on the Dakar operation
good thing manjuu doesnt do captured or prize ships
A lot of conflicting reports sadly
Oh hell no
Elbe was also taken by HMS
Imagine they do
delete germany
Then its war
Would be equal to Sovetskaya Ukraina ending up in German refit
Manjuu gonna get KyoAni’d 
do you think hamburg ever escorted grille
Stalingrad
what
Yeps

All bullshit
Ayo come look at this
“too advanced”
just a few nukes please
What does that even mean
I just love how this makes it sound like Stalingrad was bigger than Soyuz
if that makes you ur can my entire navy be ur
too advanced in the sense that her worthless designers and constructors could only build gokarts and log cabins
Too advanced tho smh
by zichfried is probably all I need to see on that entire diagram
wait
UR retros for the entire Bismarck class
this means the new mexicos are ur
Fucking hell
germany and it's consequences have been a disaster for my blood pressure
🤓 someone unironically calling themselves Zichfried
They said the ho 229 is stealth bomber
Local redditor not understanding the difference between land-based aircraft and carrier aircraft
to be fair if a piece of paper bombed me I would not see it coming
More like land-cringe aircraft
First version of list 
by some, we mean anyone that knows about it
some people

Manjuu adding a ship named Fuhrer
kills a bunch of unprepared poles
UR

Did it do anything else
despite mikasa having more historical relevance than the entire german fucking navy over its history
She started ww2 
Sailed around northern germany a bit shooting at poles and norwegians
Wait was Holstein pre-ww1 and the Germans just got to hang onto her
or was she built interwar
she was a useless pre-dread they were allowed to keep
I'm looking at the Wikipedia page how can it be sunk then skuttled
Yeah I know she’s a predread. But with the restrictions Germany had after ww1 I figured it was a valid question
germany and being chronically over or underarmed
Ngl I would love to see the 800mm gun so I can mount it on Soyuz
Like with the other stuff they did to develop weapons and skirt the treaty, building a predread isn’t the weirdest idea
Because of tooling
Insert italian speedy bois with 2x12"

UR Diderot
swolium
frankly i still dont know how to feel, with the devs adding Pompeo as gold they are either categorically dumb or they have something else planned
because otherwise it doesnt make sense
ur keasarge, has a magical girl transformation mid fight into a melee unit in vanguard using the new system
I mean undie
We’re on KMS event #3 here
So they’re probably just categorically dumb
no ok but like
people are saying "Italy cant have URs because they dont have UR worthy ships"
I get what you’re saying
there’s no reason for them to do that unless they’ve got something up their sleeve
The funniest thing is that like… while he is coping on that list for ships because ib is already running out of real ships
Meanwhile:
how do you keep ships up your sleeve
(Same story for italy, rn, japan and us)
Like Soyuz class is gold because Project 24s are for UR as Manjuu planned 

Big sleeves
That sounds like a game steam would recommend me out of the blue
IB won’t even have the ship with the highest KD ratio 
'but we do have a ur left, this ship everyone forgot italy built'

honestly I’m just hoping September isn’t a third IJN UR
?
oh I mean just gacha
third gacha

Ayay 
Warthunder and AL: I’ll pretend I didn’t see that
adds kronshtadt


so you cant really say that
2 years later
so true
Huh. Do we know for sure if any of the destroyers fired on the British ships at Dakar?
I’d have to check
I can only really find information on their smoke-laying activities
Yeah you guys don't have navy in WT.
Italy still stuck with Dante

copium for cavour this patch but even then that would 2 BBs vs an average of 3-4
Le Hardi laying ALL the smokescreens
Yeah..

Moog and Volt UR
or the spahkrueser
the ship they're keeping up their sleeve
Keep believing
if those are UR but the CRs arent im gonna be even more mad ngl
Yeah Z-52 will be likely UR while Gearing SSR 

Cmon it's obvious from Allen
Look at Cooper
Gearing will be more HP allen
azur lane works in mysterious ways
Fekin elite
im not against gearing SSR
simply because there are too many
lol
and the US doesnt need even more UR candidates
Tashkent would be UR if she had dual purpose 
what
K
It's fast.
It's big
It got 6 130mm
It's cute
It's damn strong
But nooo we got Shima UR cuz fast and torp spam
Yeah Yuudachi become UR
Then like. It's forgotten
yeah no
yuudachi ur being forgotten is nature healing
Is that an ifunny watermark
Who
Honestly Gearing as a UR just doesn’t feel right imo
Since there were like
Close to a hundred of em
I'm mostly surprised they actually gave the ship it's aa it actually had
since wt engine can barely handle it

Imagine 2 Yamato side by side
End me
+200 25mm
Damn
they strip most of the aa off ships so I was just quietly surprised
I just remembered I still have an Alaska model I haven’t even started
Gotta finish Seggs first
got her hull primered, I just need to buckle down and tape out the dazzle pattern
also yeah what was that
that from BSN or WSG or something?

nice megaphones
that's a skin
Apparently WSG has her as a BC
with the best aa in the game
ah no wait that's not a skin, but she has a kai
Ah missile cruiser refit

open Hawaii's wiki page
that looks nice
Hawaii was considered under project SCB 26 for a conversion to an aircraft carrier, with an aircraft crane and twin aircraft catapults to be added on the stern of the ship. The conversion, as envisioned, would have looked similar to a completed Graf Zeppelin-class aircraft carrier. The ship would have also been able to launch the JB-2 "Loon" cruise missile from a hydraulic catapult installed on her forward flight deck.

no don't curse it
WSG has JB refit
what about iowa cwis refit
Monty 
BSN helena is even closer to our helena

the Helena constant
very based montana

Soyuz doesn't even have scrapping picture 
the historian agreeing france should've been a major
In a blessed world

o boy the Turks and Syrians are shooting at each other again


Garibaldi muse soon?
the image in question
pretty sure that's just a joke
it's not
Our humour level is reaching new lows
we will never again regain the height of tojokistan
that was the peak of this server
now and forever
rip maine you have not been missed
Giuseppe Garibaldi was an Italian Duca degli Abruzzi-class light cruiser, that served in the Regia Marina during World War II. After the war she was retained by the Marina Militare and upgraded. She was built by CRDA, in Stabilimento Tecnico Triestino shipyard Trieste and named after the Italian general Giuseppe Garibaldi.
Decommissioned in 1953...
rip berci you were never a lolcow
now and forever
ok
this is going somewhere interesting
The Italian nuclear weapons program was an effort by Italy to develop nuclear weapons in the late 1960s and early 1970s. Italian scientists like Enrico Fermi and Edoardo Amaldi had been at the forefront of the development of the technology behind nuclear weapons, but the country was banned from developing the technology at the end of the Second ...
well that's rather unique in terms of potential nuclear powers
they went with cruisers as ballistic missile platforms
Refitted Garibaldi is an aesthetic crime if you ask me
Just slightly below the Galvestons and Albanys
Do the new Japanese CLs count as tojokistan jokes
I’d call them IJN CLs if it weren’t for you know….the army guns
it's something that came to tojokistan citizens in a nightmare
Also, the USN put polaris launch pads on so many damn '60s paper designs...
'60s thinking was to simply put nukes into everything
At least the loaders aren't fighting each other
at least the drum elevator is rotatable
dp turret
only 50° elevation
might as well do the janky single 102mm HA gun thing again
"we finally made a good modern 4.7" gun with fires ammo which can still be readily handled"
rotating tipping drum > non rotating tipping drum
get fucked brits
imagine having to play twister with the shells and charges every time the turret turns
actually keeps using the old 4.7" LA and a 4.5" DP with the same problems as the 4.7" HA guns and 5.25" DP guns like a total fucking donkey
Mixed heavy AA battery on a destroyer
The thing Drach accused the Germans of, except, now on a ship he'd probably defend with his life

tfw a single 3" AA gun without fire control traded for an entire bank of torpedoes represents a drastic improvement in your AA
but don't worry, even if you did have an AA fire control director
it's barrage only
and can't account for vertical speed
or wind
and is non-tachymetric
🇬🇧
so
literally worse than the just newly installed mount on the rushed Le Hardis


this situation hasn't changed by 1945 either
the GRUB had no correction for wind speed, requiring that the control officer override its output in situations where the wind speed was at any level above a light breeze. The GRUB also assumed straight and level flying, but could be "spoofed" by the control officer inputting false speed and direction information which compensated for small angles of climb and dive. The control officer also had to inform the GRUB operators of any observed alteration of target's course, warning them that the handwheel settings on the GRUB had to be changed. Obviously, the control officer's skill at estimating such factors had a large bearing on well the ship could successfully engage the attacking aircraft. It should be seen that, even with these war-time additions, many of the inputs to the HA table remained still based upon guesswork and estimation and not upon measured - tachymetric - data.
poggers
I find it funny how some of the Ls had to use the 102mm over 120mm shortage
And then there's the whole ordeal with Scylla and Charybdis
"our AA fire control has literally zero provision for anything besides a slow moving straight and level target"
... a predictive or "tachymetric" anti-aircraft control system was ruled out as it was considered to be too costly to implement. This was three years after the United States had sent to sea just such a system, the Mark 19 director, which was the direct ancestor to the very successful Mark 37 Gunfire Control System (GFCS) which was used on almost all US warships destroyer-sized and larger (along with several auxiliary vessels) built in the late 1930s and 1940s.
Also pom poms jamming, feelsbadman
Almost all destroyers with 4.7-inch guns had the HE time fuzes set by hand. This affected the firing solution not only by the time setting itself, but also in that the fuze setter became the critical time factor. No matter how fast the guns could fire or how quickly ammunition could be supplied to the mountings, even a well-trained fuze setter needed about 4 to 5 seconds to handle the round and set the fuze properly. Faster speeds invariably resulted in improper fuze settings and loss of effectiveness. These factors encouraged the use of barrage firing as it meant that all fuzes were set the same, thus requiring less time by the manual fuze setters. Most larger ships used fuze setting machines, but all of these could only handle one round per barrel at a time, thus slowing the practical rate of fire. An interesting but unfortunate side effect of these fuze setting systems was that the "dead time" between the point that the shell left the fuze setting machine and the point it was fired out the gun needed to be calculated based upon the slowest gun crew on the ship. As the guns were fired by remote control, this effectively meant that all salvos had but a single time setting. Again, this slowed the practical rate of fire.
Can't be true, I'm sure Uncle Drach would've said so in his hourlong international AA guide

Something something, the single bofors was more effective than the octuple pom pom
Urgh
the British unironically are in the running for worst heavy AA gun direction at war's start and end based on technical features
... radar could more accurately determine range, speed and course of the target aircraft then could the control officer and was thus able to provide more accurate data to the table. However, the HACS Table was still really only able to calculate firing solutions for targets that maintained a steady course, height and speed; in other words, it was most useful for the least successful type of attacks that took place during the Second World War.
Would be funny if Berci is still h-
remember how much Drach wanked the 5.25" gun's range?
In an attempt to increase the chances of success, an Auto Barrage Unit (ABU) was added to the system starting in early 1942. This device was coupled to the Type 285M radar system and could automatically fire a barrage salvo such that the shell bursts occurred when the target reached a selected range - usually between 1,000 and 5,000 yards (900 to 4,600 m). Fire had to be held until the target was within the 5,000 yard (4,600 m) limit and there was only a single chance to destroy an attacking aircraft before it was able to launch its own weapon.
the more one learns of the royal navy the more one is disappointed, I repeat this often
May as well put up a blimp on a wire and shoot when the plane passes it
Im more curious what led to this
an aircraft flying on a circular course around your ship falls outside the parameters of the HACS' ability to compute
Lack of testing, complacency, or?
some really fucking brainy assumptions
gimme a sec
In 1931 there was a major review of anti-aircraft defense by the Naval Anti-Aircraft Gunnery Committee. This Committee reaffirmed that the primary method of air attack against ships would be by high level bombers and concluded that destroyers 'are not likely to be the object of high level bombing or torpedo attack' and that dive bombing was not likely to be much of a threat. These conclusions were supported by the RAF, whose thinking in 1931 was that dive-bombing was difficult with any but purpose-built aircraft and concluded that this meant that such single-purpose aircraft were unlikely to be used in large numbers.1
This Committee's major conclusion in regards to destroyers was that high level bombers would only be passing the destroyers on their way to strike at capital ships and that they would not be attacking the destroyers directly. An analysis in this report showed that attacking aircraft flying at a height of 5,000 feet and at a distance of 5,000 yards (1,525 m and 4,570 m) would only be 18 degrees above the horizon. For that reason, the Committee concluded that 'future destroyers should not be fitted with a dual purpose armament' and recommended a maximum main gunnery elevation of only 40 degrees.2Furthermore, the committee strongly recommended that long range gunnery should 'take precedence over . . . close range defence' as it was felt that close range defenses were only of use to the individual ship and were thus 'impotent against high [level] bombing aircraft' attacking the fleet as a whole.3 These conclusions led to all British destroyers built in the 1930s being equipped with LA (low angle or single purpose) main guns and in having few close-range automatic weapons for defending themselves against aircraft. Finally, a predictive or "tachymetric" anti-aircraft control system was ruled out as it was considered to be too costly to implement.4 This was three years after the United States had sent to sea just such a system, the Mark 19 director, which was the direct ancestor to the very successful Mark 37 Gunfire Control System (GFCS) which was used on almost all US warships destroyer-sized and larger (along with several auxiliary vessels) built in the late 1930s and 1940s.
"dive bombers aren't a threat"
"destroyers won't be targeted"
"long range defense takes priority, automatics aren't important"
"it's impossible to implement tachymetric fire control affordably"*
*USN and IJN laughing
Oh, and by accident, saw how HMS Glatton was lost the other day
so this is why uk dds aa is so bad
Cordite fire, unsurprisingly, but to make it even worse
Something about proofing, workers used folded newspaper instead of cork, and several rivets are missing
always wondered why they had like two 7.7mms and a single quad pompom or some bs as the entire ship's aa with no dp
Great stuff.
now, regarding dive bombers in particular
This thinking was not as wrong-headed as it may appear with twenty-twenty hindsight. To put this in the proper perspective of the time; since 1924 the USN had been developing dive bombing as a means of supporting Marine landing operations. This was mainly performed by fighter planes carrying only small bombs, which was correctly seen by the RAF as not being much of a threat to a warship. However, in 1930, the USN tested dive bombers which were capable of carrying a 1,000 lb. (454 kg) bomb, large enough to sink a destroyer and badly damage larger ships. In May of 1931, the USN started purchasing quantities of the Martin BM-series of dive bombers which could carry a 1,000 lb. (454 kg) bomb for about 400 nautical miles. A total of 32 of these planes had been delivered for service use by June 1933. This was enough planes to equip a squadron, Bombing One (VB-1), which was assigned to USS Lexington (CV-2). Not long after this time the German Luftwaffe recognized the potential of dive bombers and started large-scale procurement of these planes. The Japanese followed, beginning development of what would become their highly effective Aichi D3A "Val" dive bomber in 1936. So, although the RAF was partially correct in its 1931 assessment of dive bombers, it badly misread their future employment.
the same year the RN reached their conclusions dive bombing was impractical and no one would procure a lot of them
the USN starting procuring the Martin BM
in squadron quantities
because of course
the HACS did not employ reliable stabilization, Remote Power Control (RPC) nor automatic data transmission, but instead substituted guesswork and manual overrides in an unsuccessful effort to achieve the same ends.
a very good tl;dr of what's wrong with HACS in a nutshell
In what is perhaps the best-known example of the state of Britain's pre-war anti-aircraft capability, in a 1937 firing exercise, a radio-controlled Queen Bee drone, a converted Tiger Moth, was able to fly straight and level at 85 knots around the entire Mediterranean Fleet for over an hour without being hit by a single shell.

during the destruction of Force Z, both HMS Prince of Wales and HMS Repulse apparently failed to shoot down a single plane with their HACS-controlled guns. Interestingly, the first attack was by eight high-level bombers, the very threat that HACS had been designed to combat.
true wind speed and direction can be accurately calculated by a simple trigonometric formula using the ship's speed and course along with the apparent wind speed and direction - and instrumentation to perform such calculations automatically was readily available - yet the British designers opted instead to add yet another burden to the HACS control officer's workload, as if he had little else to do but to play guessing games while trying to keep his sights aligned on the approaching attacker.

but if you close your eyes
Can't blame PoW or Repulse, they probably believed that land based planes cannot threaten ships outside port, given their lack of success in a similar attack on a somewhat damaged Scharnhorst a few months earlier

I don't know if trying to make a judgment about the effectiveness of bombers when multiple of your bombers use bungee cords for their bomb bay control is the best way to go about things
namely
Blenheims
which iirc were the ones doing that attack

Years of shipbuilding experience and this is the result
Not sure what exactly attacked, but judging by the German report it was a mix of high altitude, dive bombers and torpedo bombers across multiple waves
Naval tradition can be as much of a shackle as a hindrance if you don't update every part of it as necessary
"what do you mean AP shells need to actually pass through plates now?"
"why did no one tell us?"
yeah, came to say that, practice doesn't make perfect, practicing things that work makes perfect
even long going problems like designing ship ss to make stack smoke hit the towers, or putting powder above the shells, they had a tradition of it, but these are bad, not good
meanwhile the us had neither of these problems even in pre-dreads
The bombs were released internally, then leaned against the doors, forcing the bungee cords to give way, releasing the bombs. The only thing that alerted the pilot to the bombs actually being away is the lift the aircraft got for being suddenly lighter. How long it took for the doors to actually open depended on the strength of the bungee cords, with pinpoint accuracy not even on the table. The bombs will go out when they go out and that's that.
That about sums up the Blenheim in WW2
With the level bombers getting forced above cloud level without any line of vision towards the target, I doubt that they had much of a chance of an accurate droo anyway
The Germans reported (but good chance that plane counts are not super accurate, tho general figures should be) one wave of torpedo bombers, one wave of a combination of dive and level bombers, one wave of dive bombers and then one wave of level bombers, totalling 28 planes (identified as Swordfish for the torpedo bombers, and mostly Blenheims for the rest)

'did'
checks lists of imperial wars France fought in Italy
All that effort to keep the Germans out and then the Milanese fuck it all up by inviting the French to invade...
:p
https://twitter.com/thegeneralboard/status/1559916420657549312
https://twitter.com/thegeneralboard/status/1559916424612691970
This is what happens when you forget the “Nothing” part of “All or Nothing”
Shows Montana
Doesn't show Soyuz

Find these babies in Serbia today
Try to Stealth deez Nighthawk
Try to stealth deez
Isn’t maximizing armor over a specific area a general design philosophy of any warship

Like
AoN is kind of famous for it but in general you still want more armor over the boilers than the superstructure

What is Soyuz's armor is called I wonder
More armor under magazines than belt
Is it aon as well
I think Soyuz had some weird bow and upper belt armor


the smartest of lads
Nicho
Dupuy de Lome my beloved
"we'll go into the future with a design from the past"
Making it a hovercraft is a nice touch at least
its the only way they'll learn to fly on their own
Cursed universe where Germany goes pocket everything, huehuehue
Oh yeah that paper's British
just curve the runway a bit inwards so centrifugal force keeps the plane on the ground
as for weight imbalance, just add 900mm of armor on the starboard side 
Now extra evil
and another evil extra
Apparently nuclear powered and can go up to 100 knots
now make it a submarine'
SALVATION
What's your opinion on the Ultra Carrier
better off just deleting the rear turret and putting VLS there
and add missile silos for Tridents
Reminds me of this i found somewhere
1990s kongo rebuild

Something something egg in a basket
Hey guys
Will wearing a third rich t shirt get me under fire from countries around the world ?
Like if I ever get a job in Google and they got to know about me wearing a third rich t shirt , will they kick me out?
Depends on the shirt in question, but chances are good, yes
If it's the motive is the Reichsadler on the Swastika, then yeah, expect the obvious consequences
Hiw about a t shirt with the sign of 7th panzer division?
The inverse Y with three dots?
Yeah
O was just looking for t shirts and then my inner whearaboo awakened

I will just go look for iron blood t shirt instead
This stuff looks dangerous
As much as I like the tech, I wouldn't even think about wearing something that'd associate me with the Third Reich
you are right
also 3R is not something anyone should strive to associate themselves with, but crap, politics
Back to precious bote
why would you wear that

hehe , was just wondering , 
please make sure to focus on yourself and check how you are doing
if you need someone to talk to I am willing to do that
thanks , i will remember
i think i just thought about that t shirt without fully realizing the gravity of situation i would cause by that ,
Weather Station Kurt (Wetter-Funkgerät Land-26) was an automatic weather station, erected by a German U-boat crew in northern Labrador, Dominion of Newfoundland, in October 1943. Installing the equipment for the station was the only known armed German military operation on land in North America during the Second World War. After the war it was f...
Pretty big beer cans for an unmanned base

Iron Blood and its consequences on its fanbase
“Guys wehraboos aren’t future neo nazis, they just like German stuff”
said wehraboos:
Like who the fuck even thinks about wearing swastika t shirts besides being a genuine neo nazi 
"No see, it's simply a reference to the hit chinese mobile game-"
"Sorry was I mistaken when I said you're fired and to get off the property before I call the police?"
man it’s some edgy kid with a hard on for Bismarck and sabaton who cares
“he just like me fr fr”
man hopped in here with some bait question and proclaiming himself a wheraboo at the same time
Oh fuck, the Vichy got Richy
"I swear i be not a scallywag i just be talking like one for the memes arr. i just be liking jean bart there be nothin' wrong with that yarr" 
the fact that not a single french king was named louis during the hundred years war amazes me

i see
What could smaller-intermediate caliber shells do (say 100mm-200mm) to hinder a battleship's effectiveness?
Could the only meaningful damage they do be hopefully hitting a superstructure's vital part like bridge, gun dirctor, aviation facility, etc.?
Depends on the era, really
If you go back to the pre-dreadnought era (especially the early pre-dreadnought era), these kinds of guns are often the ones meant to be QF guns that will smother the enemy under fire, destroying their upperworks and putting them out of action
203mm is more in the intermediate range, but at the ranges they were fighting in that era, capped 203mm shells could be effective against even battleship armor, depending on how thick it was and the quality of the plate.
Generally speaking, once you get into the dreadnought era, battleships are large enough to carry heavy enough armor to where they're mostly going to render such guns ineffective, especially as battle ranges got much long (as in, not 5,000 meters or less).
I check this channel for the first time in a while and the first thing I saw was somebody asking if they could wear a Nazi t-shirt
Inshallah the Wehraboo must be purged from the Earth
Now, that's not to say that you can't use such calibers as harrassing fire, but it's extremely difficult to do so on a practical basis, because what you're doing is harassing fire, and for the most part the battleship is going to be able to respond with potentially lethal fire, and starting at greater ranges
also does any of you have an image of a KGV 4-gun turret with all 4 guns elevated into different degrees
wanna make sure this image exist and i didn't see it in a dream or something
In the 20s-40s, you do get a point where you have modern 203mm treaty cruisers existing alongside WWI-era dreadnoughts that in many cases have less range than the 203mm guns, which made it possible for cruisers to try for harassing fire at extreme ranges - and 203mm fire could definitely ruin anything that wasn't armored
But, opportunities to do this were rare and typically relied on the battleship being busy shooting at something else.
Ex, see Italian heavy cruisers harassing Warspite at Calabria, or British heavy cruisers joining in on killing Bismarck
cruisers againts older battleships
i was gonna mention hiei but that was at katana range
Yeah that's definitely a unique circumstance
And also because Hiei was a battlecruiser, so her armor was light enough that at very close ranges modern 203mm APC could still punch through it
I need to read up on Kongo armor
Wait shit they all got the same level of armor refits, right?
Their deck armor was improved, and, iirc, main battery turret armor too
But that was pretty much it
Well I'm sure 8" shells could fuck the superstructure of most vessels. I gotta read up more on ammo, focused too much on planes...
Depends on the range and the kind of battleship.
Many carried fairly heavy armor around their conning towers, to prevent command spaces being taken out too easily. That said, many older battleships had this armor either heavily lightened or entirely removed during refits, to help save on topweight.
and also back to what i was asking for
For very early predreadnought era the "medium" caliber guns should really considered as the main armament while the large caliber one were the secondary armament.
and image similiar to this, but with a KGV class
Close enough?
juicy
I've a question on conning towers
While the towers themselves are armored, what happens if the exits from the tower get fucked, or worse, the damage to the superstructure is so severe that the tower is in risk of falling
wouldn't it make more sense to armor a pathway up to the tower? it wouldn't add too much weight, right
looks fairly plausible to handle dromaeosaurid like this
now I want one as a pet
The communication tube/gangway leading up to the conning tower is usually hella armored too
it is?

i was not aware of that actually, i always assumed (based in wows) the tower was the only thing actually armored
good to know the tube is armored as well, is it to the same extent?
Often, since it's such a massively larger target area, it's not as heavily armored
I mean...
But, it is pretty much always heavily protected
Ex, as seen on the Zara-class cruisers (which actually also includes an armored director)
it's all 17.3in?
16in communication tube, it's one of the thickest protection in the whole ship short of the turret face
and here something way off form the left field
what about fusou
rip, no full armored pagoda
Seeing that Littorio diagram and thinking about it, the damage is truly catastrophic to have the entire tower lean forward after the forward mags exploded on Roma.
It doesn't take much to buckle a tube especially if the joint isn't designed to take lateral load
There was extreme stress on the bulkheads overall from that, but I see.
Don't Forget Project 24 
An unusual overhead view taken from a crane during the fitting out of Volta at Ateliers & Chantiers de Bretagne in 1937. Note the cylindrical bases for the four torpedo tube mountings amidships. (US Navy NH 86547/NH 86561, courtesy of A D Baker III)

get back here
The maiden flight of the AW249 was originally scheduled to take place during 2020, but no news has been released on any flights to date.
Goddamn she is late
The first flight of the AW249 is scheduled for September 2022 or sooner
Didn't knew she doesn't use Italian engines.
Why was the T-34 so hard to drive? For this we talk to Francis Pulham inside a T-34/85 and he explains the various details of the T-34 control rods, transmission and other elements.
»» GET OUR BOOKS ««
» Stukabook - Doctrine of the German Dive-Bomber - http://stukabook.com
» The Assault Platoon of the Grenadier-Company November 1944 (StG 44) -...
Only Royal Louis was actually built; due to the huge costs of construction, the three others were replaced with smaller-sized ships of the line.

One day Santisima Trinidad will get attention much as Yamato 
140 guns of a sail ship> 460mm number
inb4 returned just for slight editorial stuff
I've past my thesis juggling days, but publishing papers are sometimes no less ridiculous

Feels like the better your papers are, the more ridiculous the excuses are
Of course I have the option shut the editor with $$$, but not like publishing fee for reputable journal isn't expensive enough already
Seriously, the system is broken. You pay to publish, you pay to read, heck, you pay to retract
I've always been surprised with the type of people this channel attracts
you never really expect the quality of people here with the sources and other materials they have access to
especially for the history channel of a big tiddy shipgirl gacha game
False bow wake
Congrats on getting it done! Hope all goes well
overlord moment
Where is that from
i dunno sadly
Wdym, Warspite was switched with Malaya to cover up
Ah yes
Fine and dandy until your crew is poorly trained enough and tried to surrender at Cape St.Vincent.
Only to have friendly ships threaten to shoot the shit out of you if you don't raise your colours back up.
Also, skill issue, now face 170 guns
Ahh what was her name
Duke of uhhh
Duke of Kent yes
You would expect her to have the most loyal crew
Getting pounded by several ships in a row and getting your entire crew killed by raking fire will do that
RN specializes "aiming" into the hull to inflict as much crew damage as possible
is soviet have connection with italia in ww2? because in AL we can grind chkalov exp with italian ships
Italy provided extensive foreign assistance towards Soviet naval construction
Tashkent herself was built by OTO in Italy, the Kirovs were a (initially fucked up) product based on Raimondo Montecuccolis, and while the Soyuzs were not built based on the Italian Exported UP.41 design, the design had some influence towards the overall design.
Chkalov is the odd one here, since the design is more US/British influenced more than Italian
Figures, I mention Soyuz and Kremlin shows up 
Yeah Chkalov is more inspired Ark Royal ish for being Project 71. But B version
I'm a "wife guy" as people say 
Pavlov's dog Soyuz Simp

And Gnevny class heavily reminds Folgore class
The Gnevnys and following subclasses were based on the folgore
The Kirovs on the Montecuccoli/D'Aosta
The Soyuzs and Kronstadts loosely on italian designs
Tashkent is tashent and the Kievs were based on her
if we go further back in time we have Cuniberti apparently working with the russians to design the Ganguts
while the leningrads were based on the french fat destroyers contretorpilleurs


aside from An Shan and Chang Chung, what are nations that developed Missile destroyers?
Pretty much everyone
They're called DDGs
And every navy worth it's salt has been operating them for decades now
I kinda want more DDG in AL, if only.
Kind of hard to count 'Soviet DDs we bolted silkworms on in the 70s' as 'developing DDGs', particularly since the 'G' indicator isn't so much used for SSMs but rather to indicate a serious SAM armament
Arguably the first true DDGs for the PLAN were the Type 051B's in the 1990s
If you're asking DDGs in general, everyone
If you're asking about ww2 Destroyers being converted into DDGs, then only them
Mostly because everyone else had the means to actually build new platforms

DDG-1 Uss Gyatt
Gearing class

Most of the first generation of DDGs were built in the late 50s-early 60s.
How many murms are there
Not counting dupes
my server has 96

thats fucking rad
no, you don't need rad with a turboprop
Thought those lights were some funky camo pattern for a hot second there
There's Taiwanese Sumners and Gearings that got SAMs and AShMs
Like
One of them in game rn
Can't recall exactly which one
But I was momentarily salty that she didn't get a DDG retro at the same time the An Shans did
Bristol?
Anyone knows if we have gotten any retrofit for ships that actually never gotten one historically ? (sunk early in the service, for example.)
I think so

No english page 




























