#history
1 messages · Page 6 of 1
12 rds/min 120x1200mm

It's cus tracks aren't the driving surface
The road wheels are
With all the implications about traction that brings

All I want for sprocket is working machine guns
And maybe way later down the line specialized items like flamethrowers
the finest file fuckery
https://utreon.com/c/forgottenweapons/
http://www.patreon.com/ForgottenWeapons
http://www.floatplane.com/channel/ForgottenWeapons
Cool Forgotten Weapons merch! http://shop.forgottenweapons.com
The Browning High Power story begins with a French 1921 request for a new military pistol. FN engineer Dieudonné Saive developed a double stack, single ...
H-39(Hutten/FDG) 406mm P.Spr.Gr. L/4.4 :
Velocity: 810m/s
Weight: 1030kg
Lion's 406mm
406mm AP MkIII
Velocity 747m/s
Weight 1080kg
Nagato's 410mm
410mm AP/APC Type 91
Velocity: 806m/s
Weight: 1.020kg
Iowa's 406mm
406mm AP mk8
Velocity: 762m/s
Weight: 1225kg
Soyuz's 406mm
AP model 1937
Velocity: 830m/s
Weight: 1.108kg
Now I'm wondering
Why British kept the Lion guns on that kind of performance
Why not go heavier shell like US or higher velocity for more pen

China’s Xiangjiang General Aviation Development Company signed a contract for one #AW139 and one #AW109 Trekker, which will be utilised performing public #HEMS, fire-fighting and public security missions. Find out more: https://t.co/YUal7HdzHV
cant wait for the "totally not a copy" version of these helicopters in a couple years
Wise decision 
One wonder they only wanted one each 
oh wow the 139 is used by a lot of countries
Makes sense I guess
Interesting that those gun got that performance number with quite large chamber volume and pressure
Ik cordite was quite hot load, but I don't think it was that hot. It should be about comparable to other nations by that time
It would likely be for comparative trials, they have no need to copy the 139 or 109. The Chinese were co-designers of, and already manufacture, the Airbus Helicopters H175 (as Z-15 in military service, and AC352 for civilian service).
They also have the AC313A (Z-18/Z-8L in military service) as the bigger brother, which can trace its origins back to the old Super Frelon.
I figure with the British having enough experience with cordite that they can reliably reach that performance numbers.
There's also the notion of using what older British BBs used as super charge as the main propellant but I'm not sure if they can make Lion's proposed barrels last enough with that kind of load.
slower and lighter than us shells simultaneously, a winning combination
16'' uk shells are cursed
uk shells are cursed
eh, fair
le cannonball at jutland meme
and somehow, warspite turns her own fuckup into a glorious action

the power of being the best
can't destroy the gun barrels if they are hidden from view because I'm doing donuts while reloading

this is your artillery on cordite
This is damn cursed
Florida-Brasil Federation
Eh, I guess I wasn't clear enough. Should be "Why the performance numbers was so low despite the huge chamber volume and high pressure?"
Burn characteristic isn't exactly the easiest metrics to search and compare ig
eh never realized I can carry both Mavericks and Walleyes on the F-4E
Additional delays resulted from incompetent and obstructive Russian inspectors, who refused to use Winchester-made test gauges despite no Russian gauges existing, insisted that test ammunition be shipped from Russia (instead of using readily available Winchester ammunition made on Russian contract), and often rejected rifles for irrelevant flaws such as wood grain in the stock being insufficiently straight.
What were the main issues of carrier operation during ww1-ww2?
I don't about anything on WW1 carrier operation
That's because as far as i know, there was little to none carrier operations in that time 
I do remember of a planned operation by the RN to raid the HSF with carriers carrying a new torpedo bomber
The Sopwith Cuckoo
there was some flying off platform fuckery to bomb some zeppelin hangars iirc
It was ultimately cancelled, btw
speaking of Zeppelins, if you think Zeppelin carriers in WW1 as a carrier op, I guess you can count Strasser's suicidal zeppelin bombing mission as one.
Ah well, in case there was any significance of carrier use during those times that I may not know of, I thought that I might as well consider ww1
Langley and Hermes (and Argus, or what the name of the other RN experimental seaplane tender was) were built and experimented during and post-WW1 so I don't think carrier doctrine was fully established at that time.
as for ww2, then it's a lot.
uhhh for main issues
not leaving a ton of bombs and fuel lines laying around in the hangar
I see, aight
What were those other than preventative measures? How was cooperation between the pilots and the carrier crew, and cooperation between each plane division?
they're not preventative
leaving scattered munitions and fuel hoses when refueling and rearming planes fucked the IJN at Midway
Carriers in general were quite weird going into ww2 as well, as the nation's who had them all more or less used them in very different manners just due to the war they were facing and how they were jammed into naval doctrines and made their own
You have the British who more or less had CVS operating alone with a very small escort until that went down hill
Japan used wave tactics, and the US had some very fucking weird interwar naval exercises and also grouped up CVS, which the RN would also do
Each nation also did weird shit with pilots and carrier standardization
In ww2 the US would use warehouses and stuff to train deck crews on launching getting planes, where as the IJN has a totally different plan of operation on each CV and pilots would have to train if they got put to a new ship
I'm not sure if this is within the scope of your question, but In terms of carrier designs that affrct flight ops, we also have some weirdos going on the Japanese side.
Hosho, for example, had a deck island as built. That was seen as obstructive to flight ops, so Japan was fixated on small islands or even flush deck carriers for a while. There is also the well-known triple flight deck configurations on Akagi and Kaga, which are basically "fuck you" contests between two designers and end up being absolute failures.
There is also Ryujo, basically a design that tries to "cheat" over the WNT and wasn't very successful overall.
Carriers were very much in there infancy going into ww2 lol
Ranger wasnt also very good either IIRC.
Yeah was gonna bring her and wasp up but that's not their fault iirc
ranger is astoundingly mediocre
Trying to get the biggest bang out of their tonnage and shit
which means for the time, honestly she's fine
Wasp had tonnage limits, but brought a major innovation at least
Deck edge elevator
float like a wasp
And then we reach 1930s Germany... wheeze
German naval design moment
Had a few great ones
But goddamn some of that stuff is bad
Doitzs and Elbings were gud
are you telling me a kraut made this sour
b o t e
wasn't it more like
the US trained aviators by aircraft, while the IJN trained aviators by squadron
so its aviators were more skilled and worked together better
but it took longer to train new pilots
ijn ships also varied a lot so you had to train for each ship

the newest gunner
what the fuck lmfao
most likely being loaded into pensacola's turret to test the protection the turret armor would have during crossroads
What were the specific uses of the No. 69, No. 36 Mk1 and Type 97 hand grenades? For example what I mean is the Stielhandgranate 24 and Einhandgranate 39 were optimized to provide a blast effect and only to a lesser degree fragmentation damage. A source from 1940 stated, “The hand grenade is used in close combat at distances up to about 40 m, against opponents in or behind cover or when the rifle cannot be used for other reasons…Strong moral effect…Several hand grenades as a concentrated or stretched charge: strong blasting effect (wooden pillars, railroad tracks, etc.)” (Kühlwein, Fitz: Die Gruppe im Gefecht. (Die Neue Gruppe). Elfte, völlig neubearbeitete Auflage, E.S. Mittler & Sohn: Berlin, Germany, 1940, S.61)
Or would the better question be how were they used?
For some reason this pic gives me "so you're telling me a shrimp fried this rice" vibe
1st Eurcopter tiger
2nd Z-10
3rd AH-64D
pretty sure the Eurocopter tiger one is the older display
tiger lol
looks funky compared to the rest of them
US did that too, but end of the war they were training navy crew in ware houses and stuff on how to do carrier things so they wouldn’t be like the ijn when they got put on the cvs. I recall reading this very specific thing in the book about Midway as some of her crew was trained in this manner before being sent to her and stuff
the RN were kind of stumbling around
the IJN was grouped up even when detrimental
the USN had managed to realize that until you have a critical mass, dispersing your CVs means you're more likely to dodge losing them in multiple
FHCAM does reenactments of this battle at skyfair
They have both a L-4 and a Storch to do it with
Didn't Prinz Eugen nearly split Leipzig in half by accident ?
yeh, mostly because of visibility reasons because of heavy fog by the time the two were in contact with each other.
@hallow vine ok so
Yep
Wasn't that also cause Leipzig drifted in front of prinz while changing her drive shaft to diesel or something
Odin has
35k tons weight
9 305mm guns
320mm belt armor with 105mm turtleback
Kronshtadt has
9 305mm
230mm belt
41k tons weight
But Odin is a battlecruiser in AL
While Kronshtadt is a large cruiser
So in the end. It's all about armor I assume
with odin it's also about whatever weegee calls her
Early design of Scharn or smh
But yeah she is in BB slot
While Kron,Agir, Alaska is cruiser slot
It's all about what the wows devs said
Lol

Doesn't krons Wikipedia and shit not call her a CB
Yeah
CB is large cruiser for America no? 
It says she's a battle cruiser on Wikipedia
Because reminder, she is literally heavier than the american and French treaty BBs
CB is wanna be BC but legally cannot be one and other bullshit


Yeah it's Kirov class moment
BC is fantasy beyond 1920
In this case, soviets had a metric fuck ton of bb/bc plans
"Battlecruiser"
So AL made her not that
Meh
I mean Alaska’s basically just a Super Baltimore

Yeah or a small Iowa
No
Both view points work
No
Cute
Bote
Alaska is Alaska
Pocket carrier
Harriers too
Ok simple Soviet thing for you
Izmail class? Bad armor for speed and good firepower.= Battlecruiser for Soviets
Kronshtadt class? Similar armor with Alaska, similar firepower, almost same speed=Heavy cruiser

This falls flat on its ass the moment you have eyes and look at kronstadt
Kronshtadt is literally same with Alaska except 9k tonnage difference 
Fucking more tonnage then normal BBs from less then 10 years ago?

I’ve had it with people calling her small Iowa or big Baltimore just because USN aesthetics remains similar throughout classes

Lmao
That's understandable
But what else are we gonna compare her to that people will understand
Alaska is heavier than Colorado isn't she? 
Probably
Super Baltimore is a gross oversimplification, but her design is derived more from the Baltimores (with a little bit of Portland sprinkled in) than it is from the Iowas or other USN fast battleships
But Alaska also is fought over for if she's just a BC
People forget it but the super dreads are actually quite heavy ships
Like fuck kron is how many thousands tons bigger then nagato
that too. tho for the most part it was the fog that caught Eugen's crew off guard and didn't notice that Leip was already in front of their cruise line.
Alaska is just a small fast battleship

A QE is 33k tons, not far from treaty BBs
Kronshtadt is likewise a fast battleship
Kron is 4k tons lighter than Nagato I think 
Ain't Kronk 41k and Nagato is 45k
Hold up is this launch nagato or refit
kronk was 42.5 k standard
Nugget was 39k *standard after refit
so ye
Lmao
Yes Nagato was 45.950 tons in 1944
Krem
That’s a fucking BC

For the love of god
weegee moment
You’re just coping trying to use full as well
Cause Kron wasn’t actually made so she doesn’t have a legitimate Full load displacement
No

When people speak of Yamato's weight. They say the 72k tons. Not the 65k Tons.

but but mah 57.5 k ton Honey
By wrong people
Because full load is preferred
Sure, if you accept that one of them is wrong

You use full load to laugh at bismarck
You use standard to win a bb vs bb argument
Glad Jaba is here
Tea I swear to god
What
when I am about to answer a deleted post 
Sexy
Yeah, it was the OP (read: origina poster) who deleted it
and to answer that deleted question, I believe the Kawasaki Ki-147 I-Go ASM was a huge cope as it was a very late war addition.
kinda ironic that the IJA was the one operating it.
Undef 
le cursed missile superdread
Sverdlov vibes 
Ok and

@south forge it looked like the IJA just copied the V1 buzz bomb and added their own flavor with it.
Don't think so
They did trials and while it was suggested that it would work well, in reality no actual launch were done because they figured that the aircraft carrying it would be too vulnerable due to the short range.
JB-2 was pretty much a Paperclip product before the operation was actually authorized
, and I don't think they ever used it in actual combat.
I mean
they were the American copy of the V1 after all
Magic Carpet?
Operation to bring US troops home from abroad after the war
Hold up
I mixed up Paperclip with Magic Carpet 
Was about to say how would the JB-2 Rocket have brought American troops back home after the war?
in case you're wondering
What was Operation Paperclip though?
Paperclip was the operation to recruit former German engineers to design and build American rockets and missiles.
you probably have read Wernhard von Braun, the "father of rocket science".
Well it’s not the most pleasant experience but…
I mean, the munies were better when they got in so it's a win-win for them? 
lmao
you ride them like a cowboy
a Texan sailor went on top of these JB-2s before they were launched from the USS Nicholas YEEHAW
Deserved 
I doubt space race would cool like it was otherwise 
Swiss moon landing

I mean you’ve seen Dr Strangelove
Nah not that


no
correct, it's a cruiser with certain characteristics embiggened and the rest left alone, built up, not cut down
So
For how long P-40s operated in the USAAF?
Since i got someone saying that by 1940 those were already obsolete
Kindaaa ish
The P-40 saw the most front line use in Soviet hands in 1942 and early 1943.
Then replaced by La-5s
Well
Let me give the full sentence
"By 1940 those were all obsolete, only Brazil to buy that crap"
Yeah that's someone who hates Brazil
From the same place i got this
Netherlands operated P40 till 1949 as I know
That's what we call a street dog here 
Which is a national person that hates its own country
Ah a classic
P40 wasn't the best for certain especially after 1942-43. But it's not a bad plane
as completed, yes
colorado eclipses her after the bulging
alaska at standard is around 30k
colorado is around 33k
you might be thinking of nevada and penny, who were somewhat lighter at around 28k and 29k respectively
I think there was even a Soviet modified version of the M or E variant, wasn't it?
Soviets loved to remove the wing guns from lend lease planes. It made plane more agile and pilot to focus on more accuracy since all guns at nose
Their own planes as well mostly of course. Guns are mostly at nose
Nah i mean
With a different motor
Likely

Its positive accomplishments in Somalia have been overshadowed by the torture and murder of Somali teenager Shidane Arone by CAR soldiers, which became known as the Somalia affair. In the wake of the Somalia affair a number of videos became public showing members of the regiment participating in brutal hazing rituals, and displaying white supremacist symbols. The unit was subsequently disbanded.
commonwealth airborne and being war criminals, name a more iconic duo
That’s what happens when you use a unit as a dumping ground for the worst troops in the military
And some idiot fucking deploys them on peacekeeping
Isn't the airborne supposed to be an elite infantry? 
elite is doing a lot of work in that sentence
britain: hmm the french have their cool foreign legion, i will try something similar and oh god oh fuck oh shit
Depends on the nation
While yes, generally they are more skilled due to what's needed to be done by airborne troops, some times they aren't at all used as elite units, given special missions, or treated any better then a different part of the army they are apart of
and by the way, the Frenchies use their FFL as mostly shock troops these days, ala some particular branch of the American Armed forces.
read: Marines
Canada, France, Denmark and the US heading to the Arctic for the cooperative Operation Nanook 2022
HMCS Margaret Brooke, HDMS Triton, FS Rhone, HMCS Goose Bay, USCGC Bear and CCGS Leonard J. Cowley
not for long tho
marines finally doing marine stuff again
And umm what’s that
not being army #2
and refocusing on maritime/amphibious stuff
instead of being a second land army like in iraq and afghanistan
Yeah
They’ve been doing that for one hell of a time tho
Reminds me of the Romanian paratroopers in ww2, literally just used as assault units when swapping sides and not getting to combat jump or anything before the Soviets got pissed scared and canned them
but yeah that shift back to their amphibious duties is why they've been getting rid of their tanks
part of the broader pivot to asia
yeah and the whole decision has been immensely controversial
the decision to abandon MBTs without any sort of effective replacement does nothing but hamper the USMC's ability to conduct amphibious operations and realistically should be reversed until a new light tank can be acquired
direct fire support from an armoured vehicle to deal with fortified and/or armoured threats is invaluable to any fighting force, the USMC cannot simply abandon that without any sort of viable replacement
what good is an amphibious force which cannot capture the facilities required for army deployment because the enemy has MBT's present?
and what of opposed landings? yes those are rare, but you still need direct armoured support when you encounter one
i see crayon eating has extended to the top brass
there's a lot of discussion within the USMC as to where to go in the future, this whole tank abandonment is just another step in that discussion
Counterpoint
You can't even deliver the MBTs amphibiously anyway
And opposed landings are more than rare
They're utterly suicidal and are a last resort option that MBTs don't turn into a success by their presence
If you're actually in such a position that you're able to deploy amphibious forces to a beach from their ships and aren't getting absolutely shit on, then any opposition is going to be subject to fire from naval and air assets
Amphibious operations also one of the only cases I'd say with a straight face that ATGMs would be a good replacement for tanks
I mean if the Marines need tanks
the Army is fully able to provide
I doubt with the type of amphibious fights the marine corps is planning for tanks will be all that relevant
Also
There's some very notable cases of hostile armor charging recently landed forces without armor
They resulted in the hostile armor getting fucking pasted by naval and air power
I mean if the assault gun requirement is absolutely needed the solution is pretty easy
why even bother with light tanks or MBTS when you can just smack a 105 or 120 MM on the ACV
hell a 90 MM would probably suffice
Exactly
any massed landing needing armored support would likely involve the army regardless
the army’s also been looking at what it can do to operate in the sort of pacific battlefield that everyone’s anticipating
Marine Corps is there to simply secure the beachhead while Army's the exploitation force
Hence programs like FVL
The marine corps attitude is more or less
“if we need tanks, we’ll call the army. No need to dedicate a large portion of our budget on a capability that another arm can readily provide, at the expense of something we’d actually need”
generally put the Marines also have a lot more tank killing platforms as well with Switchblade in service and the ACV likely getting CROW-JS and Javelins on its 30 MM RWS
the money can be put towards more equipment for amphibious operations, or for more mobile antiship capabilities for A2AD
I wouldn't be surprised if the LAV replacement gets spike or some type of loitering munition carrier variant as well
Tanks are defined by their role which is to safely deliver a big gun that kills stuff to any position
If you’re talking about amphibious operations a warship can provide that role
I mean as cleve said actually getting the tank ashore is a entirely different issue
The decision to remove MBTs likely comes at some benefit
What this is, I don’t know
freeing up budget and space for other platforms
But the marines can rely on army tanks if conducting inland operations and navy gunfire if amphibious
Marine Corps is skimming down to focus towards island hoping campaigns on relatively small islands
Most likely this
anything there gonna face will likely be perfectly thin skin enough to kill with a 30 MM
any actual tank units on said islands would be small and inbetween
Like, during the amphibious invasions in ww2, most marine assaults started with LVTs, not Sherman’s, right?
yes
And at d day, the Sherman’s famously bogged down and led to the bloodbath at Omaha
if you need the assault gun just smack a 105 or 90 MM on the LAV replacement or the ACV
I mean the marines say it best themselves
** MARINES ARE NOT ABANDONING COMBINED ARMS**
The Marine Corps of the future will have a well-trained, well-resourced, and lethal infantry capability. Organic precision fires will provide multiple echelons of the infantry battalion with a loitering, beyond-line-of-sight precision strike capability. In combination with T-UAS, it will provide a hunter/killer capability at the tactical level to rapidly engage an enemy beyond the range of direct fire weapons.
if they urgently need tanks they can either have army units attached or retrain for the capability ahead of a campaign
I'm not saying the marines should keep MBTs by any means I'm just saying they need to have a replacement for an amphibious capable direct fire support vehicle
Like say, a light tank
Don't we have warships for supporting amphibious operations
and deeper than inland, probably army tanks will become available
I mean they do
its just a 30 MM instead of a tank gun
why is the wheel looks so tall anf the vehicle looks so narrow
wouldn't that mess with stability
its just the angle of the image
aah ok, trick of the eye
MRAP in general looks like that
and will be for a long time until we find better solution than using a wedge
@spring briar Ramjet 155mm 
ye
solid fuel jet 
https://utreon.com/c/forgottenweapons/
http://www.patreon.com/ForgottenWeapons
http://www.floatplane.com/channel/ForgottenWeapons
Cool Forgotten Weapons merch! http://shop.forgottenweapons.com
Designed by Piotr Wilniewczyca and Jan Skrzypinski starting in 1936, the Mors was Poland's first domestic SMG. Polish police forces had purchased Thomps...
I miss AHED 
@ivory ridge
bote
It's Mini Trento
Yoooo the Aliens tonk
A really stupid thought.
Could you slap 1 Des Moines gun on a tank (including at the loading system, and at least 1 projectile ring), or at least 1 Worcester gun.
(Ignoring other factors like the purpose it would serve, I just wanna know if it's possible)
not without making the tank absolutely enormous
the caliber would already necessitate a tiger 2 style chonker tank, but the autoloading mechanisms would be much larger still
you'd likely be look at 100ton+ monstrosities
Of course. As expected.
Would it be in-between Maus-sized and Ratte-sized?
Wouldn't the loading system make it disproportionately tall?
i dont think you'd get quite to maus size for a wooster gun but i dont know the particulars very well
might be more viable as a casemate
Worchester used 152mm guns, the Maus was a 127mm. I think that says enough?
Nice to know.
Tf 16" land gun-?
nah not really
given maus was also very overweight and had a stupid coaxial gun
an is-2 is tiny in comparison with a 122mm
iirc someone did the math and the maus weight is basically as strange as hipper's weight but in the opposite direction, as it has so much armor (even in places it doesn't need it) that it couldn't possibly weigh as it does
Think that was the Ratte
it'll work, trust
the viability of the maus and ratte is one thing, but the range vs fuel capacity of the maus is what really makes one sure germany was crazy
710 gallon internal fuel tank
39 mile range off road
even in the best case scenario of on road, the maus gets 0.14 mpg
just what germany needs right
so
the thing you can't move with train cars
that can't go across almost every bridge in europe
39 miles of range
I mean they could of just not overamored the maus
There's still the fuel problem
shaving off like 28 tons would do quite a bit while maintaining a mobile platform
tho end result would still be insanely impractical
And they kinda did it
Several times
Classic Germany
But a few nations had large train guns
the 128 MM would of been pointless since its a tank gun
ideally your trains wouldn't be that close to the frontline
I DON'T WANT MY LOGISTICS LINES ON THE FRONTLINE
So true king 🛐
it gets 99 miles on road at least
which is less than any version of the sherman
128 was insane overkill regardless
0.14mpg vs 0.9mpg, which nation is swimming in gas and which one has none, vote now
only platform I can think would of been practical for it was if they made some type of unarmored/lightly armored gun carrier
armored trains are based
Germany was too much of a noob to last long enough for that to happen
Yeah they trusted the Romanians lmao
Them swapping sides iirc ended the war in Europe by 6 months, so had that not happen would we have been able to nuke them?
Idk the surrender dates
I don't know about the Hindenburg line
but Berlin would get glassed
which is the original usage plan anyway


How structurally vulnerable is WoWs' Yodo's hull.
And is there a reference for the Japanese 6" DP guns that Shimanto, Takahashi and Yodo use (or would the turret design be logical to some extent) ?
???
I know those words but not how they're arranged
in any case, I'm just going to guess
Oh no, not the Mogami guns. Im saying whether or not there was a base or reference to these other Japanese 150mm big bois that WoWs introduced in the new Japanese CL line
what the fuck is a Shimanto
it's wows' sorry attempt at figuring out what Japan would do with future CL designs
Japan also never used a 15cm
which is stupid because they modified the Mogami's to use the twin 203's like the other heavy cruisers
not make them*
*as remotely conventional CLs
so you'd never see japanese light cruisers with 18 guns like some of these have
Oh wait, u didn't know-
Yah sorry, it's a rather fictional line
I stopped trying to play WoWS when I stopped seeing any historical names in battles
yes yes
so like

stuff like Gascogne, the O class etc was alright but nowadays it's just a circus
Sorry for bringing this up lol
but to answer your question
no
there's references at all
it's totally fictional
Understandable. How disappointing..
and it's a crime that WG dares to put a date of design or whatever the fuck they do for the info cards for this shit
doing more damage to people's ideas regarding ship design than Tzoli
which is saying something
Light Cruiser in nothing but gun caliber
lmao
anyways if you want to read about the japanese 15.5cm cl's
go read Lacroix' book on japanese cruisers
Aight
for specific data on guns
Lemme guess, Mogami is the dead end to the Japanese' attempt at making conventional light cruisers?
just use Navweaps for guns
Man, I wanted to see that there was at least an attempt to make an 18 gun cruiser, just like how Zao was based off a rough 4x3 8" design
Mogami was Japan trying to make more heavy cruisers
Sure.
Japan basically stopped designing light cruisers that were even remotely conventional after Agano
Zao is based off some modeling magazine's made up shit
After the 4th fleet incident (lmao) and them leaving the treaties, they modified them from "B class" cruisers to "A class cruisers"
Agano is indeed the "dead end" as far as actual IJN light cruisers go
Right, the Japanese just slapped 155mm on he Mogami to pass it off as a CL 
their other "light cruisers" are barely light cruisers to begin with
Yubari has only a 6 gun broadside

Just larger DDs with aviation facilities, and negligibly larger guns
the DD leaders are just slow and big DD's with less torps than DD's and easier to hit
basically emden
but with some torps
and less guns
sigh
Did the space spent for equipment on Japanese CLs provide any edge over American CLs, or were the Japanese CLs just that old?
or are their roles just too different to compare at all
Oyodo (Just taking a rough example)
The Aganos are best ignored
yeah Oyodo is a submarine squadron flagship
and was modified for flagship duties of the combined fleet
because lmao the war isn't going our way guys
Oyodo is anything but old as she was literally commissioned in '43
and by then her role shifted from submarine squadron flagship
to carrier escort/combined fleet flagship
with half of her deck taken up by aircraft facilities, giving her only a bit of AA on the front which is taken up by guns that will not shoot at anything regardless
so no, rather have a CL with actual AA to escort your carriers
in the end she got bombed by USN aircraft
like the rest of the remaining IJN


Still has decent AA for IJN standards
oh so this toddler has a strong punch by toddler standards
I'm sure he'll do fine against this UFC fighter
#YouTried
By late war it's basically impossible for any ship to have sufficient AA
And when in port, that's even more fun
Oh boy, we're back on Japanese CLs again, are we?


Let me tell you about the Aganos, as described by German wikipedia
That one, surprisingly, has a basis.
Roughly translated:
"The Agano class may seem underarmed, but only when compared to almost twice as heavy and complicated ships such as the Clevelands. A proper comparison would be two Aganos on one Cleveland. A more suitable comparison would be against Atlanta or Dido-class which noticably lag behind Agano, who with similarly heavy firepower can offer a stronger torpedo firepower, can move faster and has an aircraft."
Of course there's no citation anywhere
As for this: T5: Real. T6: Actual paper. T7: Fake, but still in the realm of possibility. T8-10: IJA Copium + fake.
Oyodo was such a trash concept lmfao
cant believe they ever bothered trying to build it
same, the one I posted that was on sale
well yeah, how would you cite a lie
"It was revealed to me in a dream"
wrote it in the margin of this book
suddenly remembering how i had a dream last night that japan used caged lattice masts
i dont understand what it meant
As for Yodo, I guess very small credit can be given to this insanity
Agano can't even keep out 5" SP Common very confidently
meanwhile Oyodo should really have some more AA instead of those 6.1" guns
wtf are you doing getting into LA 6.1" gun range of anything with your flagship/submarine squadron leader
Omaha looking at Agano: pathetic

shhh, might have night battles any moment now
especially with her Agano armor
This is such Japanese thing to do. Thought out a super complicated niche concept and go all the way with it. I mean, look at what Yodo was supposed to lead...
If the design wasn't crazy enough, then the "expected typical mission profile" surely will
floatplane scouting for submarines with single engine floatplanes from a cruiser
unless you want to get utterly fucked you're going to need some sort of escort for this aviation unit
Yes
And names that
Based off
Actually nevermind
Are they just ww1 crusier names
I forgot them already actually hold on
River names, standard stuffs
Yeah they're all rivers looks like
Thought I'm gonna be hearing some names from the really early 1900s
Have not checked on wg until like, very recently
I see a British Battlecruiser line now
I'm early access
Which I think is neat
they tend to reuse old names, or if unavailable, mimic the naming convention
Yup
Shame Admiral Ushakov didn't got cool name like "Iron Curtain". Since WG sticks to old names
and
Uhh
Those near top tier French cruiser like thing ?
"cruiser"
I'm still confused on what they are supposed to be
They make people who cried about Stalingrad being in cruiser slot see the true horror
Thus I am happy for their coming
eh things like the Kronstadt counts as cruisers here
nm sure
Gaijin added a Kronstadt not too long ago
which was marked as battlecruiser soo
But I'm pretty happy seeing the British Battlecruiser tree
other than indefatigable
the G3 inspired ships of course because of their unique turret layout
g3 best girl
based

exits NATO
attacks US, triggering NATO response
Yeah like. Waging war on US while in Nato would be better option if you really have to
It's the same party that wants to leave NATO and EU in current situation
So lmao
its not so much pulling out of NATO that's bizarre to me than
why the fuck would they want to attack the US at the tail end of the 90s
UK: yeeees leave the EU 
like yeah the US is stinky but im trying to grasp a reason for that specifically from an italian pov
No Soviet Union to aid as well
Likely the worst time possible
It was a feint so they could invade us and we become the 51st state /s
honestly with the amount of italians in New York i think they would've just been absorbed into New York as one of its districts
https://twitter.com/CrazyItalianPol/status/1554884679718912001?t=PLs1z4YzvK5s0_YmqDlYQg&s=19
Friendly reminder
Imagine watching the Gulf War go down and thinking “yeah we can take that”


From the great Roman Empire to this 


Hi jaba
Hello
tug friends
I think French designed a special tug for PANG
the tugs nuzzle into the mother
Wish I was the tug 
"The tugboat, for its size. It's the most powerful craft afloat"
the art of emulating tugboats as warships
What if we made a tugboat
But bigger
And armor it so much that it’s immune to torpedoes and ASMs
Stick phalanx on your tugs so they double as AA screen
why would you introduce a weak point like that into your shell construction on a shell that's allegedly good against sloped plates
The recent droughts in Europe once again made visible the "Hunger Stones" in some Czech and German rivers. These stones were used to mark desperately low river levels that would forecast famines.
This one, in the Elbe river, is from 1616 and says: "If you see me, cry"
34740
9003

Flat head shell best performance against sloped plate comrade, but I like pointy shell so we must put pointy shell underneath flat headed shell blyat
BR-412b and d my beloved
except they aren't the best
it's almost like the Soviets went back to heat treated sharp nosed shells ASAP post war for a reason
Homogeneous armor is very weak to hard nosed pointed shells
Almost like special common vs agano

yeah
and uh
even the Germans went all in on homogenous for tank armor
after the first year or two
the only thing which saved Soviet shells was that German plates were heehoo
Hehe hardened plate ja
so the flat nose still worked*
:Normal_German:
Ja
Krupp harden it more
Make it glass so I chuck a rock at it and break it
Go on, actually
I heard about this topic briefly before
But I wanna hear both of your thoughts on the topic
I'm not 100% on the details, but during the war, soviet shells were not that hard (250-450 bnh?) whereas german armor was usually very hardened deep into the plate.
This means that soviet sharp nosed shells failed to penetrate the plates but flat nosed shells could plug the german armor really well
so the german failure of thoughening the armor negated the soviet failure to properly heat treat their shells
so they stuck with those
but when armor got better those weren't working either anymore because you defeat homogeneous with hard and tough sharp tipped shells
don't quote me on this though

Hey, btw..
You got anymore of these blueprints 
(Or maybe just the sauce)
Check the Hiraga archive
Aight cool, thanks (sorry for pinging)
Historical documents left by the 13th President of the University of Tokyo and Vice Admiral Yuzuru Hiraga(1878-1943)
You might need to google translate some terms to navigate though
She's a hybrid, yes. WG provided to remove that and fuck everything up.
but 18 guns is already bad - the IJN are not idiots, it wouldn't pass for fire control.
I want whatever he was smoking with his kiseru pipe ngl.
(granted stuff like Oyodo exists)
please shoot me
that as well

silver you gotta embrace the memes
it still looks more realistic than a ratte tbh
low bar
if i shot one of their ammo racks it'll be a chain reaction of different shell sizes detonating
beautiful
During the battle, several Japanese shells hit the Russian destroyer, one of which damaged the main steam pipeline and steam boiler, causing the ship to lose speed. All attempts to close the hole were unsuccessful. The destroyer lost its course and turned into a stationary target. Hot steam quickly filled the engine room, but the hold watch - six sailors led by mechanical engineer Zverev - did not leave their combat post and continued to fight for survivability. Superheated steam, they "cooked" alive. Senior mechanical engineer V.V. Zverev tightly closed the hole with his body, sacrificing his life, returned mobility to the destroyer "Strong".



good name for a sub tender
Need a sub tender named M.I.L.F
Maintenance and industrial longevity fosterer 

Oh man I love history
well you're in the right place
"I love history Charlie, I LOVE HISTORYYYYYYYYYY"
Anyone have good sources to read about Charles Ausburn, the ship?
USS Charles Ausburne / Fletcher Class Destroyer 1942-1967 by William H. Cracknell
Welcome
Goes over the origins of the Fletcher class design, DD-570 herself, and her most important battles
She was the most-decorated Fletcher right?
That title goes to O'Bannon, in terms of battle stars.
Ah, the ship that scared off a Japanese sub with a bucket of potatoes. Of course.
This is likely an embellishment.
Accounts remark that the sub was "within a potato's throw".
Desron 23, of which Charles Ausburne was a part, was the only Desdiv to get the Presidential Unit Citation
a potatos throw is a remarkably specific and yet undescriptive unit of measurement
She and her surviving sisters also became members of the (Federal) German Navy after the war
Charles Ausburne herself became Z6
It was a remark from the cook, if I recall.
I find it hard to believe that a ship at general quarters would have potatoes handily laying around, uncooked and in bins at that.
cooks are well known for their potato throwing skills
gotta keep hungry LTs out of the kitchen afterall
Warspite (or another BB at Jutland) having bread flying out of the bread locker is surreal enough, I guess.
Still, uncooked potatoes on deck, yea, nah.
for a ship like o'bannon?
that's an irish name if i ever heard one
you gotta have fries on hand
I don't think high-explosive flash fried potatoes are particularly healthy or tasty
yeah this was unveiled earlier this week
(deleted a comment that was me misreading something)
i can definitely see other militaries world wide looking at this specifically for the viability of their own projects
ok there's nothing backing up that claim I saw about it being able to go 1,000 KMs
oil fuel will for the most part die out eventually and as it dies oil prices will only get higher, militaries need to reduce operational costs
I mean
standard bushmasters only have a range of 800km anyway
they have to get passed the issues with charging times, getting sufficient charging capacity to the front and the potential danger from battery fires
in its current form it only has 300 KM range
its all electric
the ePMV is expected to enter the field eventually employing a hybrid electric drive for 140kW power and 480Nm continuous torque, with a diesel engine that acts as a range extender.
the one that has been built is a battery only concept vehicle
I can see hybrids being fully serviceable
main thing about all electric is getting past the challenges involved
(that 1,000 claim claim was the hybrid one wasn't it)
we're probably a good decade away before we see militaries go serious on full electric
probably what ADF wants from the hybrid
probs
since the hybrid isn't actually built yet i dont think we'll know for sure
ADF is usually pretty tight lipped about project development in general
I feel like
if they can get electric vehicles in that high of a range range
you can likely make the charge times more manageable
300km range isn't that bad for most militaries anyway
since you just charge the vehicle when the unit is resting
ADF? absolutely not, with the distances involved in Australia 300km is far too short
tho the issue is still getting enough power to the frontlines
but in densely populated Europe?
portable battery banks transported in from charging stations behind the lines
you'd probably have a HEMTT or something
with a massive battery in the rear with a generator
tho the power generation requirements still remain on top of that
standard fuels just make more sense militarily right now
since in the field generating enough power would likely be challenging to keep a armored unit moving
I don't think we'd see electric vehicles in logistics for a while anyway
I can see limited use cases for special forces
Indeed but not even the military can escape global economic trends
I mean
oil is going to likely be produced regardless for a long time due to other requirements
with military size budgets you can likely keep enough fuel in production until the necessary technologies are there
Yes but it's only going to get more expensive
I mean the US Army is mainly running off of airplane fuel
To the point where some countries might just not be able to afford it
you aren't phasing that out with anything close to current tech
Avgas is sticking around for a looong time
yeah
thinking about it getting rid of the gas turbine might actually be short sighted for future logistics
especially if diesel keeps getting more and more expensive to get
(tho you can still run JP-8 in diesel engines)
Thing is avgas production is relied upon by the entire global aviation industry and requires entirely different production facilities to unleaded or diesel
electric planes are limited use cases anyways due to their range
And the global aviation industry isn't moving away from avgas the tech just isn't there
Diesel and unleaded though?
10 years before the entire developed world has phased both those fuels out of commercial and civil use
Give or take half a decade
And many militaries just won't be able to afford the drastic increase in cost that will bring
depends
electric military vehicles will likely remain out of reach cost wise for quite a while
even in a post wide adoption electric vehicles world
They will but this is just the general trend of where things are going
its likely a market will remain for diesel and unleaded fuel for quite awhile
especially when developing countries will have a much harder time making the transition
due to limited powergrid capacities
Yes but supply and demand remains king in these matters
and its likely buying diesel will likely be more affordable and practical for most nations
As demand reduces in the world's largest oil consumers (the developed world) prices will increase
And the developing world will too follow that trend at some point in this century
Full Electric Australian Abrams when
Australian range requirements mean that full electric just isn't really feasible here right now
Hell the army tried to keep Leo1s over the Abram's because Leo 1 had better range
Europe can facilitate large rural electric infrastructure
Good luck with that in Daintree rainforest
Or central Northern Territory
idk in terms of electric while it does offer advantages
Or the middle of nowhere
disadvantages even in wide adoption scenarios where diesel becomes more rare
just out way the new advantages
like if your reliant on civilian power infrastructure guess what the first thing your enemy is going to hit is going to be
if you have a network of battery trucks you then need to also develop a method of generating massive amounts of power in field
in the end we need further technological development but hybrids are an excellent step in that regard offering very few disadvantages
portable nuclear reactor lmfao
in terms of poorer nations it seems out of reach cost wise to make the switch especially with retraining their capabilities for such a thing
I mean you can make a mobile reactor work
Tho what happens when someone hits it
cry
Civilian wise I can see the advantages in mobile reactors
especially for more rural areas (assuming it’s affordable)
i suppose it depends on the front in the end
in a clash between the US and China in the Pacific, ships can provide power generation
I mean the ships also can carry large amounts of diesel and aviation fuel
odds are diesel would still stick around for the naval market as well
diesel and oil fuels are kind of necessary for ships yeah
but again the global commercial trend is trying to reduce consumption as much as possible, which would mean increased operating costs for our fleets
militaries would likely be the most able to eat the cost
they would until we can develop alternatives
I don’t really see any practical alternatives
outside of nuclear
idk how the hell you’d somehow make a ship hydropower and still have it go at reasonable military speeds for example
idk maybe we'll discover some magic rocks lmfao
only thing I think could be doable is if you can make affordable naval nuclear reactors for a all nuke fleet
idk if the USN wanted to dip a fuckton of money into such a concept they likely could but I doubt it would be anymore affordable than diesel
suppose fusion may be a future option
yeah thats gonna need a huge expansion of civil nuclear infrastructure so we can have enough nuclear engineers
if fusion becomes doable I don’t see why you can’t use it for powering a ship
tho may have similar issues to nuclear
Inb4 hydrogen
All electric is a joke
The CR3 EV proposal required more than 3 times the weight of the current power pack and fuel to maintain the same range
an ancient Majapahit statue from the Gaprang site, Blitar
What does the left statue look like
||There are 2 (two) statues facing each other in a squatting position. The Gaprang statue is depicted with the characteristics of a large body like a giant, having large genitals. The face of the statue is depicted with a sinister face, bulging eyes and a grimacing mouth showing its fangs, the hair looks straight back to the back.||
||From its embodiment, especially from the depiction of a very large genitalia, it can be assumed that the statue has something to do with fertility problems or it could be because his face is the face of a powerful giant. But it can also depict Hindu statues called tantrayana.||
the other statue has a gaping hole between its legs
Ah
clearer image of the statues
Big dicc powah
Most honorful act of Royal Navy
Pulling out of al-lore because it's already far off topic, small details like these are often key to telling sisters apart from one another
In the face of poorly captioned photos in the archive, it's a safe measure
I can tell because of the feel usually
See: Trento labelled as a French cruiser
or the AWM mislabelling KGV as Duke of York
Can be satisfied with Blücher, real bote
Just gotta bear the next week or so of people whose source on Blücher is r/historymemes
so how will you defend her
just say she was the most successful of the Hippers. End of story 
Her?
Not that much, she was in an awful position with a load that begged for that to happen
oof
btw, now that we have a gold Blucher
will scheer be gold or purple like the rest of the Desulands?
But the painting that people like to sell for that night is hilariously off
Someone tell him about USN cruisers

slightly off topic, but I can imagine North Carolina's smugface when she shows her thicc ass TDS
not that it matters, since the torpedo hit was by far not the main worry of Blücher's command

I think New Mex would be more fitting
or Tennessee
hm
North Carolina still showed some impressive TDS performance
NC's TDS is great, yea


























