#history
1 messages · Page 3 of 1
"I recall the first days when the conflict between the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia began artificially
to be blown up. Once, when I carne from Kiev to Moscow, I was invited to visit Stalin who, pointing
to the copy of a letter lately sent to Tito, asked me, "Have you read this?"
Not waiting for my reply he answered, "I will shake my little finger and there will be no more Tito.
He will fall.". . .
But this did not happen to Tito. No matter how much or how little Stalin shook, not only his little
finger but everything else that he could shake, Tito did not fall. Why? The reason was that, in this
case of disagreement with the Yugoslav comrades, Tito had behind him a state and a people who
had gone through a severe school of fighting for liberty and independence, a people which gave
support to its leaders.
You see to what Stalin's mania for greatness led. He had completely lost consciousness of reality"
“Stop sending people to kill me. We've already captured five of them, one of them with a bomb and another with a rifle… If you don't stop sending killers, I'll send one to Moscow, and I won't have to send another.”
We need Yugoslav destroyer Ljubljana as Tito personality based shipgirl while Stalingrad cruiser as Stalin personality based

The Balkan coast belongs to Austria-Hungary
Don't make me post the full name
Romanian riverine navy time
Aye Romania had ironclads
I have photos now I think
10 October 1941. SMR Regele Carol I sinking.
SMR Regele Carol I

The NMS Mihail Kogalniceanu monitor on the Danube
The NMS Dacia mine-laying ship in mission
Two Romanian torpedo-boats and a German submarine at Constanta
The 102 mm Bofors gun on the NMS Delfinul submarine
Real Romanian Navy Hours
Guys look at this little thing
CB-Class Submarine
@desert agate Do it 

It's all fun and games until the pocket submarine ganks one of your full sized boats
cheeky Italian meme
mg-34?
Yeah
With a bunch of ww2 stuff
Gas mask
Lol hat is basically the same as when I was in bmt just different patern
Armor officer and military tank historian Nicholas Moran rates eight tank battles in movies, such as "Saving Private Ryan" and "Fury," for realism.
Moran breaks down the accuracy of World War II tank history and battle tactics in "Kelly's Heroes" (1970), "Saving Private Ryan" (1998), and "Fury" (2014). He looks at the realism of features and c...

Why CIWS have STANDBY mode? It seems both Uss Stark and Israeli INS Hanit had their Phalanx CIWS in STANDBY mode during the times of attack. Which prevented CIW working
Because you don't want to shoot civilians, for example
presumably civilian aircraft
Ah 
so you don't do some especially spicy fucky wuckies
Tho I doubt a civilian will fly that close to ciw range. Radar should make him friendly by then no?
I don’t think it’s like ace combat where they read iff tags
If it’s moving towards it it’s gonna assume it’s a threat
That was one of the things that fucked Uss Stark actually
AWACS spotted the Iranian Mirage
Tagged it as Friendly however
But still warned the Stark about its path
Stark then asked Mirage to identify itself but got no response
Then Mirage turned away. Since it already launched its 2 Exocet missiles. But radars didn't pick it up
Nah Crew's big balls saved the ship
They managed to control fire and flooding
Captain was found guilty of course. Got lot of mistakes
Uss Stark's defenses against anti ship missiles were
Mk 13 mod 4 GMLS with magazine of 40 SM-1
Phalanx MK15 mod 0
Mk75 mod 0 OTO 76mm
Mk 36 SRBOC decoy system
AN/SPS-49 (V) 4 air search radar
Mk 92 Mod 2 Fire control system, STIR gun, missile fire control radar
But as I said. Phalanx was at STANDBY so it didn't work.
Mk36 decoys weren't armed or ready to use
And the plane attacked from blind spots for both CIWS and STIR that prevented use of SM-1 missile system. And Captain didn't do any maneuvers to avoid both missiles or removing blindspots
As for the SPN-49 Radar. It was activated only 6 minutes before attack and didn't really give tracking attention to aircraft until the attack
But i will blame this to AWACS plane who tagged the Mirage as friendly
Oh shit that reminds me
I went to the local gun show last weekend and some dude was selling AT-3 Saggers
I hope they were just training rounds
@spring briar Do you know what sort of cap the French 138 mm SAP had
the one used on the Fantasques?
Yeh
can't say for certain but likely similar to the 152
What’s that one like
the cap ofc misses its tip in that drawing
but we aren't sure what it looked like so
smth like this might be close enough
this being the mle1924 sap
the art is to derive the AP cap shape from the exterior view of the shell
SAP tho? 
harder
but possible
if you can see two seams you already know there's something there
I'll give you a heads up if I find an actual cross section
expect smth like this but with a large cavity
mk
Teeny
but I checked the weights and scaling it up to 138.6 gives me still a 3.5 kg weigh difference (real 138.6 is 3.5 kg heavier than upscaled 130)

and given the 138.6's hoists etc are based on the 152's it seems logical that the shells are too
also wdym teeny
The cap
overstatement
there is none
this is basically USN special common but with a dye cap
What's grundring
base ring
That makes sense
just a structure to screw the dye cap onto
and soldered in place with hard solder



don't think they did that
but I might look for the report
After Jutland, a new type of shell (known as Greenboy) was developed. As lyddite-filled old projectiles were proven to be too sensitive against thick armour, thus it became crucial to develop a new type of explosive inert enough for armour-piercing purposes. Besides the inertness of the explosive, the discoveries of insufficient fragment penetration of Lyddite-filled projectile aforementioned were also taken considered. The newly developed type of explosive, “Shellite” was a mixture of picric acid and DNP (dinitrophenol), and the naming of the explosive was based upon the mixture ratio. For example, Shellite 60/40 means 60% of picric acid plus 40% of DNP.
I christen these tests
"the copium tests"
That makes more sense
Insufficient fragment penetration because the fragments were too small or too slow?
Left: CPC filled with black powder
Right: CPC filled with lyddite
so it seems to be creating fragments that are too small
neato
Right says APC not CPC

Wonder what the frag pen target was 
ok but you get the point
even with a smaller filler compared to the CPC, the lyddite creates smaller fragments
Yeh, as it should
Must have been multi layered as that's where large fragment penetration shows superiority
Big ass chunks
Is it just me, or does the black powder CPC shell have a bias towards longer, oblong pieces?
all under water
underwater drag forces will be nasty on small, fast fragments, tru
yep
they also serve to create a good resistance against larger fragments at very high speed
maybe that's why the APC had so few larger fragments as well
faster explosive -> more pressure -> more shattering of larger fragments due to larger surface area and asymmetric force application
the USN APC did well since it seems the walls of the shells were thicker
I'm thinking the longer duration of the BP filler meant a more gradual pressure peak than HE yeh
which corresponds to the more chonky USN AP
Lesser shock effect and thus larger chunks
indeed
look at the russian 12" apc
quite a long, thin walled shell
like CPC
but CPC had a much lower explosive pressure behind it
so more shearing of larger chunks
aight
but now I really gtg

I wonder what instances of underwater shell fragment damage in WWII there are.. 
There's Yamato on White Plains I guess
some superficial splinter damage from water hammer and fragments on Sodak from Kirishima
.45-70-loaded Contenders lesgo
Load your contender with .30-06
Yes
No barrel options sadly
unless you go custom or DIY
17 HMR to .45 Long Colt for the pistols.

Contender with +P load 
iirc you can fit in a 6.8 Remington barrel
Just get a Thor at this point
yesh
Still laugh at how funky that gun looks
or just get an XR-100
Wouldn't XR-100 count as rifle tho
XP-100
idk, but if you're in the Contender train, then nup (and yes, this image is of XP-100, but it still stands).
You know what, fuck you
bolt action’s your AR
warthunder be like: "Hit"

Ye
Germans: Parry this casual
Congratulations, History 
So basically they put the Picture of the protected Cruiser Tamandaré instead of the merchant ship
Although that's the least mistake

Compared to the tons of people on that comment section repeating the conspiracy theory
Those made me sick actually 

“In nomine virtus”
Nave Thaon di Revel, il primo dei sette Pattugliatori Polivalenti d’Altura, termina un intenso periodo di addestramento.
Scopri le novità su nave Paolo Thaon di Revel 👉https://t.co/WKAtZk2DGw
BRAVO ZULU!
#MarinaMilitare #NoiSiamolaMarina
PPA my beloved
76mm sovraponte my beloved
@frigid karma I am still waiting for French Pistols of World War 1.
im genuinely impressed by this one
who...who do they think they fought
Greece and eastern europe? idk
They didn't even fight one of the big 3 allies.
Battle of Cape Matapan: So I started blasting
These people dont even know a naval war happened anyway
it's always only about ground battles
This falls into the 'On 19 December 1941, absolutely nothing happened'
aside from the two mentioned in the vid, we also have the 1873 revolver, and the star model 1914, as well as 1911s for their tank crews
france didn't have a particularly advanced pistol industry in wwi and had to import a lot of their handguns over
The Eastern Front is a battleground of Blitzkrieg and Deep Battle; Panzers vs. T-34s; Nazism and Communism. You'd think that there would be no place for cavalry tactics here. But the Wehrmacht, Red Army, and Regio Esercito do still use centuries-old cavalry tactics in their waging of war.
Join us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/TimeGhostHis...

grammar plz
I still can't understand English when used in that particular situation
Like, if you're doing n-th recursive negatives, the actual meaning is either doesn't matter or doesn't even correlate with the logical meaning

Is that you
no
this is me


Ngl, looks a bit like AAVE. The double negation is a hallmark of that.
ayo what-
Oh boy, I sure do love the cracking sound of 15 inch shells passing by and skin-peeling blast impact blowing off my face every 30 seconds
They're likely removable.
I'm sure people will sit on them during combat
yeap
Like 95% of the time the guns won't fire, and you can just sit on them with no issue
Combat or firing practices occupied very little time compared to times where you could sit on the deck
imagine having the luxury of sitting on a nice bench on a long journey
especially on smth like a La Gal
I'll prefer sitting on the aft deck of a Deutschland and using the torpedo tube as a sunroof
the guy in the back looks enthusiastic
also nice to see the two offset tubes in the centre
Guy in front is just chilling
atleast he's away from the heinous shit his compatriots were doing on the mainland
and I won't be the first to say that reading helps you keep your sanity
just got a book from a friend
lists Richelieu as 41000 ton standard

mk


Sounds like they're either using normal displacement as designed, or else they're using standard displacement after her refit in the US.
Though I thought she was still closer to 40,000 tons standard rather than 41,000 tons at that point?
it's the post refit std dsplmt
stop eating bofors.
If you want to see a simulation tested, then write a comment and I will try to make your simulation in a week or two and post it on YouTube. (Lots of demand lol).
Ah yes
Gneisenau’s 360mm turret roof (that is actually 150mm thick with the turret face being 360)

More faulty experiments for wehrbs to use as sources

Why not, do you think
oh dear lord
Scharns the pocket battleships
Something tells me this person is about to do it

armchair admirals are always hilarious
5 km plunging fire
Yes
Different navies used AP or APC designations
Doesn’t matter
Just nomenclature
Like the US using HC instead of HE
First comment is…
would still get through probably
this video has already done more damage than I expected
Something something lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is still putting on its shoes

what the fuck
Holy shit that cannot be real
Germany performed well at the start of the war thanks to their ballistas on tracks
Space Yamato
Just shoot straight down onto the deck at altitude of 5km
wh
WHAT
???????????
Remember when Christopher Columbus landed in the Americas and the locals fucking double tapped him with a spas-12
Richy are you on light mode

The Vikings left Newfoundland after they found their helmets could not, in fact, block the domestically produced .50 cal rounds by the natives
Made a small rifled slug, earbud for scale
v small
.600 caliber slug
for when that elephant is wearing level III body armor

what are you pondering about jaba
Its stability
it's very short so it needs a pretty low angular velocity
Too short and it might jam in barrel 
and is pretty much only effective at short range
yep
it was more of an experiment to see how accurate I could do rifling grooves
so now it's a spinny top
I should show my collection of weird metal thingies I made to hone my machine tooling

ironic because the spas is italian
Yes that’s why I chose it
Ah the delta wing being too back?
Every time I look at It the cockpit nose proportions just bother the shit out of me
Naa delta wings are cool
I just don't like how the front looks
Like looking straight at it
Also has the round part in the boxes
Ohhh I see. That's not her fault but the design forcing it
A diverterless supersonic inlet (DSI) is a type of jet engine air intake used by some modern combat aircraft to control air flow into their engines. It consists of a "bump" and a forward-swept inlet cowl, which work together to divert boundary layer airflow away from the aircraft's engine. This eliminates the need for a splitter plate, while com...

I'm sorry Tea. When you see it you won't be able to unsee it.
But F-35 also has them
Yes but it's not as noticeable as the homelanders bulge from the boys

It just strikes me as absolutely over the top and goofy even tho there is a reason
Cockpit also feels really small
Well plane is 20.3? meters
F35 is 15.6 meters
So that 5 meter difference show ye
I think they copied the F-22 cockpit for stealth
So they didn't try to go for longer cockpit for looks
But twin seat version may look sexier for you then

🍄
visibly, at subsonic velocities, a boat tail helps as well
so
logically
we should put boat tails on everything
damn cost and logistics
let's put a RBT on the 16" SHS
bruh
"french 380 mm HE shell"
- is actually a german 380mm HE shell

Sherman sent a Strong hug
Is Sherman an anfibious vehicle as well?
German tank
This post has been updated with comments from Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Mike Gilday The latest plan to design a future force calls for a fleet of 373 manned ships, buttressed by about 150 unmanned surface and underwater vehicles by 2045, according to Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Mike Gilday’s update to his Navigation …
12 Columbia-class ballistic missile nuclear submarines
12 Aircraft carriers
66 Submarines split between fast attack and large diameter payload boats
96 Large surface combatants like the Arleigh Burke class destroyer and the emerging DDG(X) next-generation destroyer
56 Constellation-class guided-missile frigates
31 Large amphibious ships
18 Light amphibious warships to support to Marine Littoral Regiments
82 Combat logistics ships and auxiliaries
150 large surface and subsurface unmanned vessels that will act as sensors and as auxiliary magazines to the manned fleet
0 Zumwalt

hi


Zumwalt is included in the Large surface combatant numbers you goof
Not even mentioned ripbozo

zumwalt is ddx type
Nope
no
DDX is the new one
DDG-1000
so yeah I'd assume they're in the ddg/x numbers
is zumwalt
The class design emerged from the DD-21 "land attack destroyer" program as "DD(X)" and was intended to take the role of battleships in meeting a congressional mandate for naval fire support.
Zumwalt is the old DDx let's say
It may not be all Fords
10 Ford is planned
2 is either youngest Nimitzes or
Light carriers
That US mentioned once
Here. The real DDX
yeah the light carrier concept is a big question mark
Esper called for em at some point iirc
but there's no design work being done
Yeah this is 2045 plan. Long way to go still
only specs I've heard are that they'd be conventionally powered and use emals
but thats all theoretical
wonder what the subsequent fords will be named
since Enterprise and Miller have certainly shaken up the usual convention
escape, bronco, mustang, expedition, etc
USS Dick Best when
Mustang 
Dunno man Uss Escape wouldn't sound scary to me
focus, escort, fiesta
tfw the light carriers would be about the same size as everyone else's normal carriers
Like even US/Nato have certain name respect for Soviet planes.
Tu-22 example, first proposed name was Bullshot, but it sounded like bullshit so it was a no. Other proposed name was Beauty. But it praised the plane so that was a no as well. Final decision was Blinder
Felon 
Tu-4: Bull
Tu-95: Bear
Tu-160: Blackjack 
there are no large guns on warships, they tend to have one or two 5'' at best
I mean. Navies are reducing the largest guns on ships for a while.
It used to be 406mm. Fall to 203mm fall to 152mm fall to 127mm
Then Zumwalt tried 155mm then got oofed
it'll always be useful to have a decent all arounder that is less extreme than launching a missile
Most pirates came from those nations attacking transport ships. Using guns against against boats is cheap and effective
The answer to it is even more bs for me
I don't really think they said with that meaning
Yeah...
Speaking of guns
The MB already bought 4 76mm OTO Melara guns for its new frigates
Already said that to Undie
And i think he was glad to hear it
Literally just the current LHDs
like i dont get the big deal they are trying to make out of yes/no CVLs
you're already running CVLs
marketing language
No unde like
The navy counts em separately
CVLs would be separate from LHDs/LHAs
i mean sure
but functionally theyve been literally using some LHAs as CVLs
like the deployement of whoever it was in the baltics
loaded with only f-35s
“While we anticipate that additional study will be required to assess the proper high/low mix of carriers, eight to 11 nuclear-powered carriers will be necessary to execute a high-end conflict and maintain our global presence, with up to six light carriers joining them,” Esper said in his remarks.
Ah, think I found a better source
Filling said LHDs and LHAs have a boxier design than aircraft carriers due to them having to also ballast down to launch and recover surface connectors in the water. That box shape keeps them from achieving the higher speeds that make a Ford- or Nimitz-class carrier more survivable, he said.
Still, Filling said, “I will say that our current LHD class for most nations is their primary carrier, and so our team has done a lot with the integration of the Joint Strike Fighter that make our current LHDs very capable. I think the limitations are acknowledged, though, that certainly vertical launch aircraft have limitations on range and payload, and that’s why this in-between study was asked for, to see if we could, for Distributed Maritime Operations, provide more carrier attack points than we have currently.”
Why would you need a 155 for it
A 30mm gun on each side will handle it
From what I remember. Modern 152-155mm is the golden desire of navies. But it's way too complex or expensive.
I'm not sure why. Either it's range, damage advantage or something else
Of course they are not for against pirates but land targets or ships
But yeah the concept is dead. Those guns will be replaced with much more useful missiles
a gun is pretty much never going to go away by virtue of cost effectiveness
especially if any actual conflict starts up and you start expending missiles
Not to mention storage capacity
It's interesting topic on planes too
J-20 for example. Has no guns
But latest F planes and Su-57 does
I guess J-20 will rely solely on long range sniping with missiles
Will always avoid dogfights as best she can
She also has PL-15 missile. Which has 200km range air to air
Different topic of discussion entirely
Guns on ships can be used to easily bombard static positions
Guns will stay also because cheaper targets yes
You can strafe folks with a gun on a plane, sure, but like
You won't shoot Harpoon to a small boat
it's also pronounced "Fah-Go"
the MiG and the 9K111 are named after the instrument not the slur
Yes slur is 2 G
About the 2 G slur version. It's immediate origin is unclear, but it is based on the word for "bundle of sticks," ultimately derived, via Old French, Italian and Vulgar Latin, from Latin fascis.
It somehow evolved into a slur overtime
language is weird, nobody really knows where the Fuck word came form
language is also very interesting. it's changed so much over the years that we have people who are dedicated to study what what words mean what
Fuck and miss
I mean you do
But why
historically it’s been primarily used against missile boats and gun boats
it’s most recent target was a tug boat (we can’t go into depth about that one here)
generally put militaries don’t care about cost while in combat
regarding crap like RHIBs
It’s still common practice to expend a hellfire or other similar laser guided missile

like if a military is in a combat situation it’s going to use the munitions it has unless it absolutely has to reserve them
thats because naval combat literally doesn't exist though
because if it does it's decently likely the world will end with it
we’ve had intense naval combat against both Libya and Iraq that saw the mass employment of harpoons against Soviet made missile boats
yeah and in the case of actual warfare you're going to likely actually preserve your big guns
irl atm they're sitting around collecting dust
so why not
If you’re getting raided by Somali pirates and you have a perfectly good .50 cal on deck just use that
Or, for shits and giggles, set the ciws to active
We just had a entire two decade conflict where common practice was to dump a 400k missile on 1-2 man sized targets at a sustained rate
I don’t see why that trend wouldn’t continue especially in the naval department in a peer v peer conflict
especially when one of the main tools against smaller boat attacks is the Seahawk fleet
there's an enormous difference between a protracted peer vs peer war and a two decade long shooting gallery that was so overkill and low intensity that most military development boiled down to marketing gimmicks and production for the sake of job creation
also lawd please do not call that intense naval combat
it's about as intense as going 10mph over the speed limit
In a peer to peer you have the full industrial might of the largest economies known to man going against each other
missiles don't appear out of thin air into the middle of the pacific
especially on the US side you have the ability to maintain missile especially with rationing civilian silicon production
even if you ignore production cost the sheer lack of storage and annoyance of rearming is going to play into it
It's also forbidden to reload missiles through supply ships because how dangerous it is now right. So ship has to return to port to load its missiles again
like sure early on there’s likely gonna be shortages as prewar stocks deplete but once war time production ramps up I doubt the US is gonna have issue maintaining a missile supply
this is approaching the same sort of logic as saying a soldier should use his M4 to shoot apart some foliage in his way instead of using a knife because, well, fuck it, the US is drowning in bullets anyway
ammo conservation is one of the most basic concepts out there
horse
If your a USN ship engaging small boats
Why wouldn’t you use your Seahawks hellfires
especially when odds are said small boats likely also have some type of missile system
werent we talking about full ass harpoons
I was referring to missile boats and gun boats
im talking about honest to god AShMs
since there’s the historical cases of harpoons being used against ships that are only a few hundred tons
Shooting RPG to single infantry 
like the Nanuchka
I’d use a harpoon against
This is what I was calling a small boat
Yeah against missile boats it makes sense
Since that thing can hurt you alot
But non missile boats
You may try to harpoon the nanu, but the nanu has a CIWS
yeah that historically hasn’t worked for it
Not an amazing CIWS, but it actually has one unlike any small western boat of its age
yeah its packing fucking malakhits that one's valid
We didn't start strapping Phalanxes on until like 15 years after those sailed out with AK-230s
I doubt gun CIWS is really gonna stop any modern ASHM most of the time at this point
Hypersonic ones especially. Since they weren't designed for those speeds
dinky phalanxes no
It's replacement, the far more terrifying Tarantul, ups the ante with a 76mm capable of defensive fire and two AK-630
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tarantul-class_corvette
The Soviet designation Project 1241 Molniya (Russian: Молния, lit. 'Lightning') are a class of Russian missile corvettes (large missile cutters in Soviet classification). They have the NATO reporting name Tarantul (not to be confused with the Stenka-class patrol boat, whose official Soviet name is also Project 205P Tarantul). These ships were de...
Tarantul 
It also swaps out the ancient Termits for P-270s
They have the NATO reporting name Tarantul (not to be confused with the Stenka-class patrol boat, whose official Soviet name is also Project 205P Tarantul).
goddammit stop doing this NATO
if you're going to make goofy reporting names dont use the same damn language
akula was bad enough
There's also the one-off Tarantul IV which swaps the twin AK-630s (one on each side) for a rear mounted Kashtan

have we even had one successful combat intercept of a ASHM with gun CIWS
I wonder why US didn't do similar Kashtan type CIW. Like combining Phalanx with Sea Ram as single module
Honestly it’s wasteful

Why waste time with the gun when you have a missile system there?
since again gun CIWS is increasingly growing more and more ineffective
gun-based CIWS in the 20-30mm range has always been bad at its job
Queen Elizabeth
0 missile
3 Ciw 
True I guess
There is no good photos of RKA-71 with it mounted
but art based on the grainy photos has been made
Gowd can't wait for her in War Thunder
its so cute
I mean phalanx has had plenty of successes in the CRAM role
Well it did saved the ship from Hull hit I guess
I’m just referring to any success of using any gun CIWS in combat intercepts
There were actually multiple cases in the persian gulf where Phalanx would have worked (it was on target) had the RAMs or SM-2s not hit the missile first.
In fact, it was part of the reason we decided to put the Phalanxes back on after taking them off
That said, Phalanx won't work against anything supersonic or hypersonic
It just doesn't have the range
I mean it’s better to have them then not have them
I just don’t see the point in super Russian style gun CIWS when missile get the job done arguably better
just try something with actual punch like italy
But against something like Termit phalanx works well in testing, and in practice would have scored a few shootdowns had the missiles not nabbed them first
Do NATO allies share the secrets of anti ship missiles between each other? Since one of most success against hurting NATO ships were done by French Exocet missiles
I mean, yesn't
The harpoon club shares info
the exocet club shares info
the losers in the corner with Otomat share info
But the clubs don't really talk to each other
presumably the same reason every other ship runs AAMs and gun CWIS at the same time
they're just uh
on the same mount

I mean in that case just bring more missiles and have a smaller CIWS system
Honestly, if you want a gun CIWS go 30mm or bigger. 20mm offers only a narrow engagement window against subsonic missiles, and is basically hopeless on anything faster.
you're gonna have to ask the majority of navies in the world about that one
I mean, it all depends on how much you're trying to invest into the CIWS, but the whole point of CIWS is that it doesn't have a huge extra footprint on the ship. It's there to save you from leakers, but any serious effort to improve the defense of the ship should be going elsewhere, to your main layers of defense.
There are the Oerlikon 35mm systems which are really cool as they aren't gatlings, you have the dumb Italian 40mms, and you have the GAU-8 derivatives (Goalkeeper and the PLA's CIWS setups)
also yeah it helps the funny ultra tunguskies are firing rounds that hit like a particularly stiff breeze rather than just a light tickling
Ex, the reason Phalanx remains so popular is because of how limited the footprint is
Gigantic APS system for ships 
like I get it the moment you need a good CIWS once a missile bypasses every other later of defense my argument becomes dumb but considering how it’s gone historically it just seems gun CIWS isn’t the best investment to double down on
and frankly redundancy in case the missile fails to intercept is just never a bad thing
you never put all your eggs in one basket if you can help it
Fujian's 1130s have even been fitted with an AESA
based
Weird they removed it now.
(The 1130 being a GAU-8 with 11 instead of 7 barrels, for a 10,000 rpm cyclic rate.)
GAU-8 phalanx
that's a goalkeeper
It is pretty much the final word in gun CIWS, unless you want to count the Chinese 20 barrel system they are working on
~~the chinese in no way copied goalkeeper as the basis for the type 730 which evolved into 1130, no siree 😮💨 ~~
This thing is underrated
AIM-220 will follow similar purpose
wonder if you could make the new 50 MM bushmaster work with the phalanxes radar
copying is fine and dandy as long as you're copying something as based as goalkeepers in my book
The original 730 is as close to a straight goalkeeper clone as you can imagine
They've since added on extra sensors, revamped the gun...
Kashtan

still hate the way that system looks
dutch wank represent
Reminder they have a type 2030 in development that actually fires twice per rotation (at top dead center and bottom dead center)
Cyclic rate of 20 barrels firing twice per revolution? yes
lmfao
China is underrated I tell you
They literally develop a new weapon every month
honestly at that point those guys are just fucking around to see how ridiculous they can make it
I mean China isn’t really underrated
Also Kashtan/Kortik is being phased out for Naval Pantsir
Main issue is they just rarely share anything spec wise
Difference was other than new system etc. That Kashtan had no missiles while Pantsir does right
i love you water tunguskies

should've just stuck more gasts on tho
That makes it even more sexier. The mystery behind it 
sounds like a good way to get a STD
Fear the unknown 
The pure amount of Chinese systems that exist but are hard as shit to find anything on their capabilities
Hell most of their "reveals" are non offical photographs too
I probably need to pick up or download some used Janes books at some point
hey kremlin i forget are you actually russian
Nobody knows really
When you don't know someone's nationality. You cannot blame his choices as national bias 
So I keep that
🧠
i need to track down an actual russian to get the fsb to sell me an rsh12
i want to break my wrist but in a niche and fancy way
Ask Cinbri if it helps
eh they’ll probably show up on the black market soon
i desire my wrists to cease existing
o god that thing
Javelin were like 60k$. But how do you know if it's legit or scam. Since that's odly low price.
i guess it helps theres a fucking bajillion of them
That as well true
Javelin wise
idk I can see several areas where those things can get leaked out of the system
Regarding Russian gear it’s pretty common to find gear stolen from the Russian army for sale
fsb trying to develop top-down 12.7mm rounds to avoid overpenetration in a hostage situation
like you can get ratnik for a affordable price
i've bought older fsb stuff for pretty cheap it just gets a lot dicier going for actual firearms lul
Is that the super gun from destiny 2
that said these are just for counter terrorism shit so it's not exactly gonna be often out in STRANGE, UNSPECIFIED EASTERN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES
yes
they’re deploying FSB units to the magical land of Eastern European land
But enough about that
yeah but these are goofy specialty guns and pretty new/low volume
i'd expect them tossing stuff like vals around more often
..which i'd also like
Like I'm pretty sure I remember ironically the guy that made the br in 2 just didn't know what a famas was
Also is this new helmet for J-20?
probably should talk about this in the other server tho I’ve seen everything from DSR-308s to MP40s in magical Eastern European land
Which server 
don’t worry about it

my sides are still in orbit from that one instagram post with the mg42
85 MM anti aircraft guns being used as well
waiting for someone to dig an elefant out of the ground
Which?
I mean I’ve seen T-34s used as roadblocks
I have seen things you people wouldn't believe. Burning attack ships on shoulders of Orion.
i'd need to dig it up again but it was some azov dude holding one up for a camera with a caption that boiled down to "once again defending europe from bolshevism"
Also don't ignore the activated Museum IS-3
Have I’ve ever told you of the grand battle of new Hong Kong between the UNSC and the covenant
and my eyes rolled back into my head
lol
wasn’t that the Italian MG3
I remember the image you were talking about without the cringe text
and i cant really eyeball mg42s and mg3s apart
Finally they fixed the Sherman
I just remember seeing the patch and seeing the weapon and going “yup this man is gonna have a fun time”
...i like how they're all t-34s
Type Sovetsky Soyuz 
ok one on the far right
You could make that into a cool sci-fi tank probably
right here we go
this got posted in a voice chat and both me and my super freaboo friend started howling

the blue armband just in frame really ties it all together like a ribbon
yeah that’s the one
It was the Italian MG3 I think
So stealth for tanks may actually work somewhat
i thiiink they're already playing around with goofy radar absorbing paint to bring signatures down a bit?
there’s not really much radar guided munitions out there that are gonna justify the sacrifices for the proposed stealth designs
Damnit
but that's fairly minor
all that really matters is thermal signature reduction
shoutout to that weird french camo that fucks up visual recognition algorithms
That’s probably going to be important going forward tbh
aye
Speaking of. Why tanks exhaust aren't under the tank but usually above or side
never thought I needed a F-15 tornado hybrid in my life
i enjoy
I have no idea
I’ve seen exhausts placed all over the place
I just assume whatever’s most convenient at this point design wise
probably a water concern
or just mud
because putting them on the floor would let it start piling in
I mean back when exhaust would blind your thermals in WT
Im just remembering the blind spot the Stryker and Bradley had
and i think making a snorkel that could reach under to the floor but also not get destroyed whenever the suspension bottoms out a bit is gonna be a ballache
b-based???
also thinking about it having the exhaust at the bottom is probably not the best idea seeing from what horse said
aye
since if the vehicle gets damaged by a mine but can still run you don’t want to give the crew carbon monoxide poisoning

i think you could make it work with some trickery but it's not something anyone has really sat down and seriously played around and designed
and there's other more straight forward (partial) solutions
like dedicated cooling for the exhaust gasses
I mean if you don’t want any exhaust just start running hybrid vehicles
well, fully electric, hybrids are still gonna need exhaust
not a bad idea
You get the benefits of a EV without the drawbacks
plus a tank should be excellent at recharging it's battery via energy regeneration since there's just so fucking many sources of friction and waste heat you can draw from
god
a fully electric tank just sounds like the most cursed design possible
like you'd have to heavily armor the bottom of the hull since it would be especially vulnerable against AT mines
and likely would have to keep the crew isolated from the battery incase it catches fire
If we do run out of natural resources. It will be forced solution no?
Crewless
in my head I'm basically imagining a modern MBT-70 but electric
cooling a 1500hp electric motor is going to be
A tank battery would be was bad as over cooking
Interesting
Like turrets will fly
Green energy tanks 
you would have to basically give the battery its own armored compartment
that would probably need if possible its own blowout panel
electric is also a sort of iffy solution
Literally need to pull a space odyssey
synthetics and hydrogen are probably more practical in the long run
Can you use human parts as biofuel?
Like how they eject the AI
idk current EV batteries are decent for car use
tho for military purposes
main issues are the design compromises needed
the fact you need to spend several hours charging it
since you aren't charging a tank battery fast
and it would likely be even more lithium intensive than current gen EV batteries
lithium is hypercancer for the environment and for automobiles it has its own issues
I mean
like having an absolute microscopic spare part market
Every gangsta till Tesla's tanks start passing profit of General Motors
compared to the average C02 emissions of the current car market
its a decision between compromising the global climate
or local environments
future batteries have the promise of greatly reducing the amount of lithium required
yeah, it'll just likely dial right back when synthetics and hydrogen are up to snuff
tho that doesn't change the fact lithium mining will devastate local environments
What happened to water powered engines 
What's the point of an EV tank anyways. EV automobiles I get but why a tank
I mean
it would be cheaper to run and have the sound benefits
main issue is just
weird ass design requirements needed
alongside charging times
and additional vulnerabilities to AT mines
global lack of fuel in the future, near silent running as far as engine noise goes, absolutely fucking enormous torque and throttle response, no exhaust
I can see it with future EV tech
especially with the new lithium batteries that are much less fire prone
Leopard 2 already had problems just with the turret capacitor banks
tho with current tech its just pointless
Full electric sounds absolutely nightmarish
hybrids probably the way to go regardless if you want the benefits of EVs
the Sara future
But US is honestly one of the forces with the least to worry about when it comes to introducing novel/synth fuels
funny hybrids with energy regenerative systems tickle the engineering corner of my brain
everything mechanically bleeding into each other is cool and good
Lithium is nowhere near the worst nightmare in most modern batteries
Considering it's been a huge focus
fair shout
That the military has been bashing a certain party over the head about
But they can also take the most advantage of the technology by starting the development earliest
Which is what they've been doing
Oh
(It is possible to build cobalt-free lithium batteries, but Lithium Iron Phosphate chemistry doesn't have the energy density of Lithium Nickel Cobalt Maganese)
Tesla Tanks one day 
LIP battery chemistry does have other benefits - it lasts far longer (over 10,000 full charge cycles) and doesn't have a thermal runaway mode. It's also much cheaper.
the average elon musk fan showing the most recent elon musk wholesome twitter post to the children in the Elon cobalt mine
im eagerly looking forward to tesla dying when everyone else (rapidly) gets good at EVs and it turns out the funny meme man is a complete moron
You've never seen a Nissan Leaf explode like a tesla or other EV because Leafs use LIP batteries for cost reasons
Amazon's Tanks 
Impossible, he reposted an anime meme on social media once
He must be a smart businessman
I don't really think Tesla is going anywhere
tho Elon himself deserves some type of reckoning
Probably not anytime soon
I mean, the Polestar 2 and the Ioniq 5 are a lot better than what Tesla builds. And they use Volvo (polestar) or Hyundai (Ioniq 5) OEM parts.
same
Corn powered tanks when?
*cornrade
tesla can survive without musky tusk as long as they make their cars look less fucking horrendous
ethanol powered tanks
otherwise i will continue casting curses upon them
But technically already a thing
Turbines are exceptionally fuel agnostic
Yeah, the US has run the Abrams on Ethanol
Which, if you know how the US makes its ethanol
Means Corn Tank Corn Tank
And on hot fermented leaf juice*
The US is unironically a corn-based economy
They started to use Silicon Carbide right. Shouldn't that change things or it's overhyped technology?
It's main reason of obesity
Not really
can someone explain to me why most EVs just decided grilles suck btw
Corn doesn't effect meat as well right. Since too much corn could mean feeding the animals with it as well
electric motors and batteries are still hot as fuck and also most cars look fucking horrible without them
Force them to put the batteries in front with a grille so firefighters can actually douse the batteries
Rather doing gymnastics that are different for each brand
Because there's no stanard
Speaking of which
I wasn't kidding with corn-based economy
like even if you're not using them for cooling holy shit just keep it for aesthetics anyway
like, for example
No no put the batteries on the bottom for emergency explosive propulsion
It is really something the amount of things we make from corn, and corn derivatives
take this SLS, reasonably good looking car imo
Oh gawd
I will never not find it funny that EV fires have to be treated the same way as nuclear reactor emergency
That said, this is getting off topic
Constant immersion and circulation
Because otherwise they will eventually manage to use the water's components to reignite
And also the water used ends up more contaminated than the water used for a reactor

you see these cars were built months to years ago so its history
also to be fair to merc they managed to make this thing look pretty alright
concept but still
i love how i could instantly tell it was a goofy lambo concept
Finding a more efficient ICE and a better emissions control at car itself would end up working out better than EV considering the losses incurred between the power station and the wheel meeting road
fucking people flying Ustache flags here for some fucking reason
























