Discussion - mid12345678910

[icy hawk]

5 is actually too muhcc

id like it to be 3

not cause u have 3

i always though about this

[heavy basalt]

its not difficult to not get warned 5 times 😭

1 or 2 is understandable, but by the time u can even reach 5 you should have atleast a few appealable by then

[icy hawk]

change it to 3

lwk

[still zephyr]

keep it the same

no point

just follow the rules and your fine

[bitter kindle]

Threshold for what?

[cinder depot]

If you get warned 5 times you get banned then you have to appeal

To join back

[bitter kindle]

Oh, that's not a very good system, not all warns are equally as bad

[icy hawk]

they do

wdym

like

u get a warn if u sent the n word

if u spam

these are fair

[heavy basalt]

tru

we're actually starting to ban for spamming tho

so it's all good

[bitter kindle]

It's fair to get a warn for both, saying the n word should get you baned faster than spamming

If people are banned based on warn count, you'll end up banning someone for 5 minor incidents but let someone else who said the n word 4 times be free of consequences.

[compact lodge]

I agree

Maybe 4

[still zephyr]

I think 5 is enough honestly

We dont need more or less

Its perfect how it is

[carmine relic]

This should be an instant unappealable permanent ban

[compact lodge]

That should be a ban

People who say that type stuff are bound to make problems later on

[icy hawk]

i never said that it doesnt deserve ab ban or anything
can yall stop pinging me for this