#š” i dont think the ranking system is "fair", i feel it should be based on a challenge, like if yo...
1 messages Ā· Page 1 of 1 (latest)
Please discuss this idea civilly, don't forget to vote on this idea in #šļø±server-suggestions!
im sorry to say this might be THE worst suggestion of this year so far
you cant just say that and not explain it at all lol
i think you just said it in a very weird way, instead you should make a ticket but that staff memeber should ask you for your work so you can actually be authenticated
it's not staff, but the way you get a rank is make a ticket, submit work, it gets judged by one or more rankers, and you get ranked based on where they think your work falls according to their judgement and guidelines they follow
I don't know about other skills, but I don't think it's possible to make an exam that could reliably judge the requirements for scripter 2, or judge the skills required for scripter 3+ at all
yeah this is terrible
what challenge could judge someone's ability properly
like with gfx you cant ask someone like to do rimlighting and that automatically makes them qualified
Before you say itās terrible maybe make your point a bit more thought out lol I donāt just mean make em do a single taskš
im not elaborating because repertor just said everything there is to say
but you did make it seem like a single task when you said "x challenge"
Itās a challenge. Not a taskā¦
Also repertor said it wouldnāt work on ONE skill lmao thereās 10š? So I think you saying āterribleā kinda backs up my point of saying maybe make a better point before saying that
whatās the difference
A task is a single thing. A challenge is multiple tasks
yeah and i gave an example of why it wouldnāt work for gfx
do you want an expert from every field to explain why it wouldnāt work for them specifically
Okay⦠so Two / 10 cool
Iām not a ranker so no hence the āsuggestionā and not the action
brother you seriously need to read some definitions before jumping on the bandwagon wagon lol
Your points are just nil at least repertor gave an opinion and not just a straight dissš
saying that the current system is unfair because itās opinion based doesnāt make sense because you need confirmation from multiple tankers
rankers
Since when?
and also a challenge would just take too much time
Soooo creating a script for scripted 3 = easy buuuut doing a challenge for scripted 3 (exactly the same) = too long?
Rightā¦
what?
How? You have no rank?
Righttt
So we just forgetting the point now cause you have no valid argument?
i just gave the argument?
Hmmm well⦠ānot opinion basedā because multiple tankers have to⦠give their opinionsā¦
bro obviously some work is involved in ranking
you use your PAST work
And if you have no past work?
maybe we arenāt on the same page i assume you mean like you make a ticket, then they give you the challenge, you do it, then get the rank
you cant
why would you apply for a rank when you have no experience
Yeah but more complicated than that but itās not up to me to decide hence why I put it in suggestions lol
Why would you use old work for ranking up if youāre gaining experience?
past doesnāt necessarily mean like old
i would apply with my recent stuff
and what i think is best
For example I cant use any old work for ranks cause I have none lol
** You are now Level 12! **
so then donāt apply for the rank
if you donāt deserve it why should you have it
⦠bro youāre missing the point. Giving a challenge would allow for people to provide recent work instead of having to use old work. They might also learn things along the way if they canāt do them
Makes sure your scripts are actually up to date etc.
how fast do you think people improve
Someone could submit something they made in 2020 but because of updates those scripts donāt work anymore, so they get the rank and actually have no clue what to do because of new code
like something you made 2 days ago probably isnāt gonna be complete garbage in comparison to what you can make now
then if the rankers see that itās outdated then they deny it
EXACTLY. Iām saying ranks shouldnāt be an open close sort of system. They should be something that people apply for and build up to and eventually submit their challenge similar to like a school test or whatever
So the tankers give them a list of what theyād need to learn to have the skills to get this rank. The ranker then asks them some questions letās just say āwhat do you use collection service forā or something, the ranker confirms they actually know what theyāre talking about and they review the submission and then boom someone with a rank that ACTUALLY knows what theyāre doing
whatās stopping them from using google
Thatās where the rankers actually do their jobs. Come on you must know how easy it is to distinguish a human answer from a robot answer
open a ticket and ask
š„±
itās pretty easy to paraphrase on the fly
If staff want peopleās ranks to be genuine they gotta be willing to go through answers and check if say they use chatgpt or google
this ain't a school exam
why š
i feel like you should
yeah thatās what iām saying itās not that serious
Kind of is when you think about it
Literally learning computer science haha
Thereās chats that help people learn stuff etc if anything this is quite literally a school environment
You can technically even higher a ātutorā to either do something for you or help youš
So yeah⦠this kinda IS a school test
there's problems to this like tickets just absolutely stacking up and rankers since they're doing this completely voluntary not wanting to literally tutor people or act like a teacher assigning homework
this would not work for like 90% of the skills and make all skill role tickets 10 times longer to do
thats my point they shouldnt be short.
so let me get this straight, the whole point is to needlessly make the rankers do extra work and make the people apply do extra work for something that is no more reliable than what is in place š
no problems there
I feel like you just didnt think this one through
I didn't make a script for s3, I submitted work I did for projects I'd be working on even if the ranking system didn't exist. Likewise for s2. The other members I know of that earned s2+ did likewise.
Why do you feel that getting certified to a certain level should take a long time and lots of effort?
Getting to a certain skill level can be difficult, but I don't see why getting the rank should too
because thats the correlation
takes a long time to get
What correlation?
The ranking and the skill are two completely different things.
in what way are they different? shouldnt they be the exact same?
Generally you can't get the ranking without the skill in the current setup, but you only get a ranking when you apply and submit enough work
so what happens if the person thinks they are a certain rank but they arent? they just get told they arent and thats end of? they have no way of knowing how to get the next rank
ive asked rankers why i couldnt get a certain rank and their reply was "we need to see more"...
tfs that mean
My experience was that the ranker that disagreed had a conversation with me
yeah YOUR experience what rank did you apply for?
S4
in other words you had plenty of knowledge and experience to go off of whether they advised you or not? im talking about newer people like me
If you think rankers should give more feedback on rejections, that sounds like a fine suggestion that I'd probably vote for.
okay ill suggest that then?
like when i applied to g2 i got told that "youre not at g2 level yet" okay? so what is?
But excluding expert judgement of actual work from certifications IME tends to make the certifications much less valuable. I've seen it repeatedly in the real world, where many software development certifications are completely worthless
newer devs need to be told this so they have some sort of direction
otherwise its just a blind test of "i think this is good enough but it might not be" and hoping for the best
there should be some sort of system where a person knows they WILL receive the rank beforehand
Here you go: #šļø±server-suggestions message
as depressing as it is after all that youve summed up my original suggestion in one sentence lol
i just didnt know how to word it
instead of challenge i really meant "guidelines" like you say like "you have to be able to do X thing for this" and such
and how would you make a non cheatable test with objectively right asnwers that can accurately test the skills for all skill ranks
came in a bit late jimmi its been resolved now lol
not really
just saying why waht you said didnt make sense, as far as my reading of this no one said waht I just said
so not late
okay i dont care like i said its been resolved :))
real
we are actually making documetns for all skill roles documenting evrything you need to know about the evaluation
we already had one for scripting but were making on for each skill
pretty sure it also incldues example works for certain roles
itll take some time but it will also save alot of time