💡 Remove the 500 robux minimum in <#630526392144101388> and <#728187027467796571>. People should ...

[abstract moon]

Please discuss this idea civilly, don't forget to vote on this idea in #📝︱server-suggestions!

[gritty citrus]

@rapid tinsel what are your thoughts on the matter

[rapid tinsel]

I may be wrong, but I always thought of it as a quality control

[gritty citrus]

@primal moon same question. Are you afraid that people will be taken advantage of?

[rapid tinsel]

And some people don’t know how much their work is worth because they’ve never had robux before

So 500 is a good baseline

[gritty citrus]

The only downside I could see with this is that if everyone is offering, like, 50 - 300 robux, someone who’s really good at what they do may feel pressure to lower their prices so they get chosen even if their quality of work is better

[gritty citrus]

So then you believe that new devs could be taken advantage of because they don’t know the quality of their own work basically, yeah?

[cursive tapir]

i have to be honest there is already a loophole with this thing where people just say 500+ and negotiable

then they just negotiate it downwards

[gritty citrus]

We’ve warned for when people say 500 but can be lower. The exception is when they say 501 and negotiable because technically the could negotiate to 500

But it would be better if we could just have the accurate prices

[cursive tapir]

talking about negotiable prices ( #💰︱selling-assets

[gritty citrus]

Yeah that’s not allowed currently

[cursive tapir]

:/

[gritty citrus]

I think you should still be required to include a price in #💰︱selling-assets and #👷︱for-hire, I just think that it shouldn’t have a minimum amount

[cursive tapir]

yes

i agree with that

[gritty citrus]

Then vote yes :)

[cursive tapir]

since you changed the wording :)

[dusk crest]

i'd be for a channel for free hire people

[gritty citrus]

like a separate channel for people to offer their services for free and/or under 500 robux?

[dusk crest]

ye

[rapid tinsel]

That sounds way worse

[gritty citrus]

That sounds like it'd become chaotic like DevPro's Free/collab channel

[dusk crest]

the free for hire role seems hard to find tho

[gritty citrus]

i do agree with that

[dusk crest]

they never talk in general

[gritty citrus]

A lot of people with the role just chose every role tho tbh

[cursive tapir]

not for fire + for hire moment

[dusk crest]

[rapid tinsel]

Leaking mod stuff!!!!!!!

[gritty citrus]

That’s member information that anyone can see?

Anybody can see individual member’s roles

[rapid tinsel]

Mfw can’t detect irony

[tame field]

I don't agree with this

A reason the minimum price is set is to avoid flooding

There shouldn't be a minimum price in #💰︱selling-assets, but there should in #👷︱for-hire

Otherwise we have to deal with "make my whole game you get 100 Robux for it"

A lot more to moderate for the marketplace mods

[tender gyro]

This is a shit idea if the minimum were removed, it could flood the marketplace with low-value assets and services, potentially making it more difficult for high-quality offerings to stand out and reducing the overall perceived value of the marketplace

[tame field]

This

[tender gyro]

oh you said the same thing

i did not read sorry lol

well almost

[gritty citrus]

Nobody is asking people to make their games for them in #👷︱for-hire…?

What are you talking about

[tame field]

Damn bruh I was thinking of #💵︱hiring ong

https://tenor.com/view/uk-gang-gang-uk-drill-drill-rap-gif-22259702

My point still stands though, example aside

It's to prevent flooding

[gritty citrus]

Ill make a new suggestion just for #💰︱selling-assets

[tame field]

🔥