#Party mode and 2v2 3v3 game modes in ranked
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
4 stacking ranked would be miserable for other players, it should be like faceit where its a max of 2 people per party, also 2v2 and 3v3 modes might kill ranked q, perhaps this feature is best for LTMs
Why should this make 4v4 miserable for players? If there are two people in a group, that's not bad, in principle, but why can't you assemble a whole team of four at once, even if you consider that there's some gap in their ratings? 2 vs. 2 and 3 vs. 3 are unlikely to kill the ranked queue. Yes, they might even be empty. Most likely, 3v3 will be the most empty, but 2v2 is something like a flash match. There are a lot of 2v2 flash tournaments at ranked ds servers. If they do them, it means there's demand for them. They don't often do 1v1 or 3v3, mostly if it's a small flash tournament, it's 2v2, if it's a larger one, it's 4v4. If they add these modes for a limited time, then they can understand their effectiveness. At the very least, they can conduct such an experiment, and, depending on the result, draw further conclusions about introducing these modes. But I think it’s worth trying, at least for 1 ranked season.
if 4 stacks existed the best 4 players could simply queue together and shit on any other team that played against them. as for ranked modes i dont think there are enough players to support multiple modes, plus you can easily play 2v2s and 3v3s in nack, cka, and kpc
it is quite possible on alt accounts, but not on the main ones, bc good players also play on their rating, and thus, playing against noobs, they will humiliate themselves more, you don't get any rewards from playing on servers, so this is also a minus.
wdym humiliating
i dont think you know what your talking about
Playing against noobs humiliates a pro player
I know what I'm talking about.
@onyx radish thoughts on this
because all comp players HATE playing against noobs amiright
I think you are an idiot
TBH
Did I say that pro players hate playing with noobs? I said that they humiliate themselves
Explain your point of view
how exactly is it humiliating for pros when they end up 10king
You obviously are not a pro player and neither am I but I don't logically see how a pro gets humiliated by doing well in a match
And the fact you said that you know what you're talking about means that you are an idiot
Hence why I called you an idiot
First, read what was said, it was about pro players can make a party of 4 players and smash all the lobby, of course not on their main accounts, at the beginning they play against noobs, and here it is about why they humiliate themselves with these noobs? And not about the fact that they just humiliate themselves because they play well, isn't it clear who plays on anranged acs? Either this alt belongs to pro and he smurfs, or a beginner, or something in between
I've explained everything to you in detail. And I really know what I'm talking about
I dont give a shit about the party queue there should be no 4 man party queue at all that would be insanely unfair
I could stack with 3 other tier 1s and literally win every game
you obviously don't know how the game works
T1 should play with players at their own level, not with noobs. You probably won't be assigned to T1 players if you're not playing at the same level, and if they're using alt accounts, it's a violation. For example, you could get banned on KPC for this. Therefore, it's important to consider this, such as reporting player due smurfing
The solution to this problem is quite easily feasible
You might not understand what I'm talking about, but I'm saying that if pro players want to make a full team of four players and dominate every game, they'll still face resistance in their rankings, and it's not guaranteed that they'll win every game. If they want to create alt accounts and do it this way, it'll be humiliating for them to play against beginners who are new to ranked games.
as a t1 player Im telling you that there is no way that we can get games with only tier 1s
There is a reason tier 1 nack/kpc get zero games when it's tier 1 only
What is it?
You say its easy but whats your answer then
^ Sums it up pretty well
i like the idea of 2v2 2 stack queues
just would be hard to implement considering the low player numbers and taking elo into consideration
it doesn't have to be t1 with t1, but their skill level should be similar, not like one player gets 5 kills in the entire game while the other gets 13k points.
Just add report to player due smurfing
"skill level should be similar" so basically you're saying that there will be 3 games every night for the good players
yeah that's smart
🤣
It's unlikely that there will be only 3, it's clear that you won't get a game against 4 good players at once, but you will clearly not be so relaxed about your rating
I wonder what's so funny about this? If this practice is truly feasible. If you record your games, or at least record a few moments where you can see a player isn't playing at their level, send the link to the video to kpcg, and wait a bit, then that person will be banned, and the problem will be solved.
That's dumb tho
I'm not sure about the state of ranked as i havent played in a while, but top players used to get like one game an hour max since their ratings were too high
Playing on an alt was the only option if you wanted to enjoy some ranked gameplay
why
If you search for a game in all regions, it finds the game very quickly.
As i said i'm not up to date with the current state of ranked, I'm only explaining how it used to be
If you're now able to get games fast even as a high ranked player, then that's really good
at low ratings it finds in a minute
Yeah that's my point
some people just want to play ranked games, not wait for ages for a single game
Which is why some people were " smurfing "
Nope
Queues take less time now but the matchmaking is awful
Still takes about 10 minutes when there’s different people playing not just the same lobby requeuing into each other
Smurfing makes no difference because the match maker puts everybody into the same game regardless of elo
So “smurfing” means nothing
Smurfing is when you manipulate the elo system with new accounts to put you into easy lobbies, but the lobby is the same even if you’re on a master account vs a silver one
At this the moment, smurfing doesn't matter because there are too few players in the game, but with more players, this problem will need to be dealt with.
it puts everyone in one game because there are very few players, otherwise even at low ranks it would take a lot of time to pick up a whole lobby of bronze or silver players
Perhaps the developers did this on purpose to keep this mode alive.
it does
u and another player gets 2 npcs while other team gets 2 players 2 smurfs or 2 players 1 smurf 1 npc
smurfing in ranked just affects the ranked experience negatively and should be banable
or the match maker should work on number of kills/death of everyones last 5 games
but that smurf can be replaced by the person on their main account
so it makes no difference
the player is the same
so why would you waste time and ban smurfs now if it doesnt matter? literally proving my point thanks
Because the problem needs to be addressed immediately, not put off until "when needed."
It's the same as an illness. If you don't treat it right away, it will be much more difficult to do anything about it later.
yea itll be replaced by an actual player whos actually silver and not some tier 1 eu kid quing asia on a brozne acc
idk about asia
but in NA its literally just higher rank NA people playing on silver-gold NA accounts
dont get many asia/eu ppl in our games
but yea ur right but at the same time a master can get in the same lobby as a silver-gold player
so smurfing doesnt do anything
maybe for na
not for asia
it ruins soo many games in asia
so smurfing should be banable
it not being banable coz it doesnt affect 10 games played in a region doesnt make sense when its ruining 50 games in other region
yea i can see that