#Add 1v1 and 2v2 to Ranked Mode

1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

ionic tide
#

upvote upvote upvote
why is this not in the game?

compact skiff
#

i agree, 1v1s and 2v2s are WAY easier to get into for new players compared to 4v4s

mental garden
#

good suggestion as always

polar pasture
#

I disagree

compact skiff
#

can we perhaps get an argument

ionic tide
#

can we perhaps not be stupid

reef dome
#

i agree that it would be easier to find games but i think it would be harder to get 4v4s then, when people just want to play 2s and 1s because queues are faster

#

if people just queue 2v2s and 1v1s what do you think happens to 4v4s

compact skiff
#

the idea is about getting more people into competitive

#

1v1 and 2v2 are way more likely to get someone to play

#

either with a friend or something else

polar pasture
compact skiff
#

its more about exposing us to flaws that we might've had in a blindspot

polar pasture
#

I wouldn’t have played krunker if it was just 1v1s or 2v2s

#

common wicz changing the argument

compact skiff
#

yeah i agree

#

but ranked v1 was pretty succesful for 1v1s

#

so there is a playerbase

#

for more brainless gamemodes

polar pasture
#

Even though it was successful old nack and ke we’re more active than ranked 1s and 2s

#

were

#

And it was 4s

#

Yeh there’s stats in jka discord

#

And chat logs here talking about long queue times for 1s and 2s later on

#

There’s many arguments for why 1v1s and 2v2s are good but it’s just not good enough to out weigh the pros of 4v4s

#

That’s why it’s not worth arguing

compact skiff
#

was about to say that

polar pasture
#

Lower elo ranked is 1-2m queue times

#

It’s just after gold it becomes slow

reef dome
#

play kpc

polar pasture
#

I assure you 2s and 1s will be that also lol

compact skiff
#

i agree

#

queue kpc

polar pasture
#

It’s the same probability lol

#

If you 1 guy that isn’t on the same level in 2s it’ll be unwinnable or auto win

#

If there’s 2 in 4s on one team it’s the same thing

#

The nice part in 4s tho is that it’s usually 1 on each team

#

This assumes 4 equally skilled players will want to play 2v2s

#

It’ll run into the same effect

#

Matchmaking will be the exact same tho

reef dome
#

lets not

#

maybe a one time event

polar pasture
#

Even if 4 good players play in a ranked match

#

It becomes a 2v2…

#

With 2 noobs

#

But I see your point

#

I think they should add voice chat

#

For a lot of people a good 4v4 is a win

#

I’m still satisfied with 90% of my ranked matches

#

Cuz I always look at it as what can I do more

#

It’s not supposed to be fair always

#

Or easy

#

I’m not satisfied when people leave or intentionally troll but that will be handled

#

If ranked was so bad then the leaderboard in na and eu wouldn’t be representative of skill

#

But top players in na lb are all players with earnings or good players with grind time

#

And can hang in top lobbies

#

None

#

Went from being super easy to hard

compact skiff
#

but that is another topic

reef dome
#

nah not always

polar pasture
reef dome
#

ive gotten games where i lose the amount i gained from the last win

compact skiff
#

okay maybe im exaggerating

polar pasture
#

WR is still prioritized

compact skiff
#

but if you were to go 50% winrate you would always climb

#

in the end

polar pasture
#

I think you’ll climb but plateau at high gold

#

It’s a lot harder right now to climb to master even to get to diamond

#

Honestly don’t mind it tho

#

Do it

#

And see

#

The same people that complain abt Val ranked type like this lol

#

I think it’s similar to Val 20% of games auto win, 60% you can control, 20% auto lose

#

If it’s such a dice roll you have players like demise with a 90% wr in 30 games

#

Or mozz last season

compact skiff
#

so ya

compact skiff
#

only difference is that youre usually in the elo you deserve to be

polar pasture
#

Just an example

#

Can list pvlse

#

In the beginning

compact skiff
#

bro i didnt dodge a game

#

wicz will never believe me

polar pasture
#

If the outlier is getting messed up then it might be an issue

#

If demise and mozz had 30% winrates then I’d say something is off

#

70 I think

#

If you’re a systems player that needs structure u will never thrive in ranked

#

Just being honest

#

You’re better off with scrims or nack/kpc when pugs have vc on and it is tier 1 limited

#

There’s people like Shadowstorm that is up there with high winrates as well

#

More people do play

#

It’s in lower elo

#

I like that

#

Maybe not 1v1s tho

#

2v2 and 3v3

#

But the thing is 4v4s will be dead

#

And people might miss 2s and 3s or will never be able to play 4s

main girder
#

Given a choice between getting games and 4v4s being dead vs. people not getting games and 4v4s being semi-alive, I'd go with the former.

long aurora
#

Have it so you can be in the ranked lobby queue and play 1s or 2s vs the people you’ll be playing against

spiral belfry
#

A 3v3 mode sounds good to me

inland obsidian
#

some people are just so good at those gamemdoes

#

like 2v2

#

hes like a pro

ancient wren
#

People probs just want it coz 4v4 match making is soo shit when the match making isnt rigged nobody will ask for it

paper hull
#

Honestly, some of the most memorable matches I've had were 1v1's. I think there's a pretty engaging part of being competitive, which can be expressed through 1v1s.

ancient wren
#

💀

#

That time 15k concurrent was called dead game now we are at 500-1k

paper hull