#Stockfish 17.1 test depth 60-70-50
29 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
?
Check
?
I'll do some tests on the engine alone.
Is English not your native language
It is difficult to understand what you are saying
use translator
Sorry
My English is not very good
Always in one position, the motor calculates two movements that cannot be decided which one, which makes one think that there is still something more to squeeze out.
@lapis kernel
Proof 1
If you mean that the best move can change even at high depths, this is normal
Trust me, I will change that no matter what it costs. I will keep my word.
@lapis kernel
I will analyze about 100-200 positions per day and see something that repeats itself.
proof 1
- e4 c5 2. Nc3 Nc6 {Opening: B25: Sicilian Defense, Closed Variation, Traditional} 3. Nf3 e5 4. Bc4 d6
analysis of a4 d3 h3
First, we will look at the ideas for each play or movement that are reached with each one to determine a response.
a4
- e4 c5 2. Nc3 Nc6 {Opening: B25: Sicilian Defense, Closed Variation, Traditional} 3. Nf3 e5 4. Bc4 d6 5.a4
For this I will have to do an extreme analysis that may last a few days or hours to determine how good this movement is for the engine.
I will do this by looking at the creativity positions and how good A4 is.
Stockfish 17.1 vs Stockfish 17.1 100 games
First we will see from this position playing these engines 100 games
The result will be displayed here