Move Misclassification

[worn bay]

i assume you are talking about chess.com move classification stuff

that's not part of stockfish, it's something chess.com built independently on top

in other words: this has nothing to do with stockfish and no one here can do anything to change that

[bold kelp]

both moves are equally bad, according to the rules of chess they should be evaluated equally

[flint igloo]

Also recheck your proposed mates in 1. Some of them are not even check and some aren't mates.

[fading jasper]

they are all mates and they are discovered attacks on the king, so the knight moves and the bishop checks the king

[flint igloo]

Examples: h4 is not a check; Ng5 is a check but not a mate as Kh6 is possible.

[fading jasper]

yea but most of them are mates, sorry

but Kh5 is a blunder because it allows mate in 1

and i’m guessing it was misclassified because stockfish was at a really really low depth or really really short on time

[flint igloo]

g5 allows mate in 1 as well

[fading jasper]

oh yea

[fading jasper]

you sure?

I can’t figure out how

[flint igloo]

Qxg5 looks pretty mate to me

[fading jasper]

right yea it’s mate

so Kh5 is best move and g5 is alternative but they both lead to mate in 1

[flint igloo]

From an engine's perspective they both lead to mate in 1, so they are equal.

[tacit epoch]

btw, we should close this issue since the answer has already been established

[worn bay]

you can "close" support posts?

[tacit epoch]

I remember there was one closed about replacing "support" with "help"

[worn bay]

must be a mod thing