#In Golden Flame
1 messages · Page 124 of 1
Man this is literally the scene where Po finds out his real dad isn't a goose while he's a fucking panda
Jade: "Girl... I... I am a literal tube soldier-"
-# I feel like Eruca can go an unnerving amount of time without blinking
Kid named system trauma
i was also going to play a burning memories mech but tbh burning memories is way too much
ESPECIALLY the vergil mech
bro has a novel for every system
plus with the enkidu if vergil gets close to me i just kill him
Deserved
too long didn't read AAAAA mech
I'll try to cover you with my razor swarms
but vergil is completely on his own out there
i don't need it i'll win
there's something so funny about the "allied or hostile" inclusion here
I can't wait until the final combat, you'll be out of repcap, on 2 stress and 3 structure. No remaining systems and your only weapon is your integrated melee
bifurcate the goblin
what situation would you want to rip your teammates in half
won't happen i'll kill em first 
when you get that twinksunzi
"you fool, you're jammed. You can't attack me or do anything about this. Additionally the priest has put a sanctuary on me, you don't stand a chance"
"THIS ISNT AN ATTACK BITCH. IM INCREASING MY ORATOR DIE FROM THIS"
god i love orator
"getting the enemies to stand down with the power of my voice and tearing them in half"
-# stupid question... but how much armor can you pile onto a frame before it stops being a twink...
same with FA
not fa
just because you put a big coat on a twink doesn't make it not a twink
thats not what you said though
Source: Al's unhinged psyche
Bifurcate, is unfortunately hostile
Orator however, just doesn't want you to attack or force saves
oh my god not what i'm talking about
really? what makes you think that?
just simply do not attack
Just tear them in half lol
same situation with FA just do something that isn't an attack, and you can still use the reaction while jammed
How
it doesn't say that you need to communicate nor is it a tech action
oh wait i'm dumb
no reactions
well you can still increase it 
Yeah
holy fuck i want to go home lmfao
i've been jammed once and then i just grappled the mfer
ive never seen jamming used i think
But increasing field analyst die is limited to not taking any hostile actions besides scan? Anything that targets a hostile? No FA increase
pizza warmer broke, freezer broke and almost electrocuted me/we're probably going to lose a bunch of frozen product, microwave broke, and my coworker decided to get into a screaming match with shoplifters and i was sitting there listening to them threaten each other like :)))) im not involved :))
i'm just accepting i don't know what the fuck you're talking about
1 more hour though
because you can just not do a hostile action
Real
That is true
Ushtabi
Pebcac your friends
pebcac shots
"You do not recognize the screams in the vent"
where's kutuzov in the triangle
"I full action pebcac my mates"
"YOU BASTARD WE'RE NOT UNDER ANY EFFECTS"
"Hehe, time to roll a d6"
never did i think i'd be a lancaster
good question
soft butch meow
I think I'm a Frotth?
futch or butch-ish
I'm butch-ish, femme-ish
lets go im a goblin
or maybe futch... idk man
Same as Lannie?
gender
Ushabti tho
the swallowtails are different
I like being Ushabti
My next char is probs gonna be ushabti or gothy femme
fair fair
i think im pegasus swallowtail
where's the Orchis on this? otherwise:
- MC: butchy-femme
- BW: Femme-ish Goth
Would Amber Phantom also be a gothy femme?
wait are we just picking our mech or what
Orchis be indeed foth
i don't think the phantom is that gothy tbh
bro looks like a power ranger
butchy femme?
femme-ish imo
I mean… most SSC frames are crowding the fem and goth corners
it's the hooves
juli don't
am I wrong?
Don’t what?
hoof whore
-# is that what bronies evolved into…
I’m sorry naana
But it will happen again
Oh ik where shrimp is
i know
i think i'd like to be femme-ish goth but i'm probably closer to where the vlad is
The "man" category... Featherless biped
What are you talking about it’s flawless
No way ||featherless feather||
sometimes you just gotta kill
This ain’t about them
unless i trigger overkill 5 times and enter the danger zone
You still generate heat when Torch misses its attack, and when you land torch hits w/ disdainful blade you can throw a knife or plasma claw
Fair- but if you have the right team then you won’t miss very often
everyone else is consuming the lock ons!!!
You can also Lock On but pfffft
we have 2 greedy gobblers
not in the danger zone!!!
ahem
NOOOO
Hunter 3 is next priority tho I assume
you know what i never considered
Noooo
excluding the swallowtail, are there other good lock-on inflicting mechs
saladin with spotter
i think maybe we need more lock ons
Goblin
nah, not really
Do you have good sensors? Yes, you're good at lock on
Any mech with 15 sensors
deez
but a gobbie eats lock on as fast as they make them...
BALLS
hipo can lock on to 2 characters and both of you can consume 1
Why is the Goblin consuming lock on tho?
Tarax is good at it
it gets rewarded for not doing that tho
More accuracy to their tech attacks
Liturgicode?
it needs a teammate to shoot its beyblade
oh wait I'm stupid... I thought Autopod only procs when the gobbie consumes the lock on...
also you have the HORUS core that lets you lock on as a reaction
Anyway Chomo (yes it will consume Lock On but that’s what Spotter 2 is for)
goated
"please, I just need +4 +2 accuracy to hit bro, please I really need to hit this puppet systems"
my honest reaction
targeting a hornet
just bifurcate some B
You should bifurcate yourself NOW
bc its between gilgamesh with giant rocket launcher that blows holes in buildings or support goblin that will help the lock on consumers consume more lock ons
If we’re going off mechs that enjoy staying still technically speaking Barbarossa is a decent Lock On-er
And a Crack Shot Death’s Head is also a pretty good Spotter
10 sensors but size 3 makes you literally see above covers
i could easily see myself having fun with both but i want to contribute meaningfully to team synergy
Metahook Barbarossa
Honestly, We'll have a Enkidu and a Amber Phantom Vergil running around in the front line so an artillery frame/playstyle could combo well
LOL SICK
This deffo fits the vibe of SSMR uhuh yep
LETSGOOOOO
GRILL DAD
catalyst pistol
for THIS BUILD
projected shield, torch, 2 overkill rolls that will definitely happen. boom, dangerzone 
tf2 pan sound
Basically
Heatgunner sworder
target me with your blast 2 cluster i dare you 
I think if I could play absolutely anything and we were at a higher license level
I would love a toku with those fucked up electric claws the manticore has
You can just do that
Oh yeah
Sadly it's a heavy CQB so Toku's meek mounts can't handle it...
that is the saddest thing I've ever heard
I just think it would look so fucking cool
Super Saiyan mech shooting off a kamehameha
at least the Annihilator has some secondary attack effects like the arc projector...
You can make a world killer reflavoured as a burn oriented Tokugawa. Sacrificing sensors and technology for up armouring and heat resistance. Decksweeeper equipped with dragons breath rounds and a duckbill choke
Tokugawa actually being another offshoot of the manicure would not be too far fetched
manicure
Well I was editing it but I got called out so I can't change it
The HORUS MANICURE 💅💅💅💅
There's also the Sherman with its ZF4 SOLIDCORE "fuck everything in that general direction" Cannon?
Thanks I regret my words
i was gonna add lips and eyelashes if that makes it any better
Please, no 😩
please yes
doitdoitdoit

🫦
Castigate the enemies of the Valley-Girl
Ok the eye lashes are pretty fucking funny
Mech about to sing Science Fiction Double Feature
Damn
What's wrong with WHorus?
al-
Pixel
When yo tapping the manticore but that mf Charged Exoskeletons your shih
i never want to say that again
WARNING! THIS MACHINE.png 
wonderful haha
weren't you just in chapter 3 like, a month ago
Pixel is built diff
His party clipped through Al's map and skipped CH4
t-that means ch4 spoilers ||no puppygirl?||
That's when I sent him the secret hidden map
The backrooms
It contains the worst enemy of them all
Regular assault
Backwards longjump through [chapter 3 spoilers]||'s Cabin||
CH4 ||actually they convinced CAUSTIC and let it leave with TRIPLE POINT. Phoebe also helped pull the casket back together :>||
ohhh... I am not sure what I am going to do for ch4 ||but spoilers I am tempted to make it easier for caustic to be convinced, but triple point lashes out at being left, so combat ensues anyway! with either caustic helping or... against, depending what they say||
but that's a problem for future hipo
right now... time for las vegas!
huehuehue
you'd be surprised.
i would not
:3
I wanna be your frien :c
Accepted
:D
i love scheduling
Ironically, in my Wallflower group's last session we had to determine what downtime action covered "find someone, anyone in this town who will give me a fucking manicure"
goodnight <3
Just finished another ending of CBP-2077 and it made me wonder if a Subaltern like Lotus would even get a funeral. He can't be put in a composter and being scrapped for parts may not be the ideal outcome for him, so it makes me wonder.

Which ending?
(no dlc spoilers if applicable)
Morning :3
Mornin
Gay morning everyone!
Gorning
Question the answer to which I'll check in on in the morning: has anybody (other than my insane housemate) used the Catastrophe Beam?
Maybe, but that depends if they survive past the first shot
it is a morning indeed
It do be morning
morn
G'm...
it is a mourning 😔
The what
Yippie I have adquired a 5th player :D
We have 2 duos and 1 guy mixed in the drama
Yippe
exotic from ||ch2||
I am a duo against my will-
It's gonna be fun
Not for our characters but still
am i the one mixed? 🥺
bunny thump
was i even talking about players?
Vergil but it's a bnuy girl with a tempest sword
Vergil but it's a bnuy girl with a tempest sword good
Vergil's gonna be so evil yall are gonna have to kill him session 1
and then you have a deer ready for the therapy stroll through a random forest
-# I have too many of these memes
oh god jsjsjsj
good morning calliopeeeee
June! :D
no, it's October
I thought it was July?
that's you Juli!



Who allowed this child to pilot a mech-
it's too joyous-
The deer posting is especially funny to me cause of reasons undisclosed
are you allowed to disclose those reasons?
i do mind actually
who became deer coded?
3 days
also her name is jade omg I don't know this deer and I love it already-
I love that we constantly devolve into [insert critter here] posting
Critter posting is good
Also just because I remember it from yesterday
According to @west phoenix this critter is AI generated and cannot be real /Insert JK just in case
flabbergasted
ok, last critter posting so we can go back to lancer
but friendly reminder that this bastard exists
critter posting and lancer go hand in hand
No one actually
And for the actual reason u shan't say, that's @shell bison choice
More than fair
Deer posting for Act 2
-# |it's when Jerry finally sprouts his antlers||
Some word choices after I wrote that arevery funny
||[Don't] Fear the Reaper. I let Johnny keep V's body and spent a while checking all the names at the cemetery||
one of these days im gonna ask the wise folk of igf chat for maid dress recommendations
I think that's the first ending I did
good 1761585240 calliope
Shes also Vtuber on twitch, under the name jadevelfire
I'll keep in mind :D
When jerry Asks the SRT to come in their best attire
Men in maid outfits, Women in butler outfits 
What about the other way around
both valid
hmm wanna ask
where can i get the character arts for the IGF characters?
tried to take it from the pdf, but it's always with white backgrounds which means my PNGs end up with messy spiky white borders
I think you can use office draw to get them without the white background but I might be wrong about this
I usually just make the tokens taking advantage of that white BG! but yeah, the images are the one in the pdf <.<
Hello Calliope 
I have transparent pngs of all the characters in act 1
Am i allowed to post them here in a zip file?
Loki zip bomb
i'd be interested.
You are now thinking about a blunt
I know that you can upload them also here so people can see it and use it
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1SUZx4YIG9xyEtBwYjZGqicFdYQk05vFzSw_Z97O-fMY/edit?usp=sharing
do ping me if you've uploaded it since i plan to use it
you can also use any online "pdf image extractor" to get stuff from any pdfs
I used a PDF editor to copy and paste them into an image software
I got myself a sun lamp to burn my retinas while indoors
The first thing I bought when I realised I could buy whatever I wanted with my money was a lava lamp
i hate late at night
"damn I need to see colours rn"
And then I flash bang myself with blue
I would let her watch orange
1 frame pimpkin
Because I would not be watching tv so I don't care
pimkun
funniest part of the lease agreement i'm signing rn
performances of any obligations hereunder by an act of God,
strikes, epidemics, war, acts of terrorism, riots, flood, fire,
hurricane, tornado, sabotage, or other occurrence which is beyond
the control of the parties, then we shall be excused from any
further performance of obligations and undertakings hereunder,
to the full extent allowed under applicable law.
the stupid rabbit ass gif
which one
the "formula" they list as how they calculate my utility costs is the number 6
oh my igoodness gracious
don't worry, I have far stupider gifs
HEllo calliope, I am vibing this this color scheme
melonhead
bunny got to excited
gordon you lousy motherfucker
hello gorgon!
and stop fucking with the microwave
"Good news Gorden! The cybernetics department replaceded my colon!"
I always seem to spawn in during bun content
usually you show up and the bun posting commences
june buns reveal
oh my gooness gracious bunny dot gif
Guh
I have an uncanny ability to arrive during most bun related topics
the Celery Santiago
:c
I'm sorry It was literally the first thing that came to mind
can't share nothing
The Grass Wonder also came to mind
YOOOOO FASHIONMECH
;v; thank you
damn I already felt bad
sorry again Void 
hello calliope
ello
c:
The bun that goes around
comes around
With s fucking mech!
me when I’m Homophobic Marge from Five Nights At Homer’s 2
='w'=
So that's the first Yuri
@tame tide I want you to know that my players liked your (ch2) ||GETTING RAILROADED|| map enough that they asked me to do the combat again right now two hours ago (and also so that they could try out builds a little bit)
And I got to absolutely destroy them this time
One of them had a white witch and I got to marker rifle him every single turn
Fuck your core power
I got to work 30 minutes early and was STILL late to log in because I went to the bathroom and the lock broke, trapping me in the stall
... how's everyone else going this morning?
Doing good
Finally got to take revenge on my players for bullying my opfors in a non canon reenactment of a fight
I hit 4 attacks in a turn with a breacher 
I think I still love cataphracts the most
are they now swearing complete destruction of all breachers now?
No but the one that played the white witch said "Ok, next time, the scout first"
Oi don’t steal the bnuy, needz him for session
Hehehehehehehehehehe
clawks (yes the whole screen is the clock, no I don't know why I do this to myself)
you guys scare me with your landing pages and your fancy clocks
eh i don't do much, i just steal from others :)
Not 100% sure yet, though I did just have a cursed idea:
||i think it would be really cool if it manifested as errors in the system, like it wasn't supposed to be there||
||and when it's filled up it's almost replaced/erased the slots for the regular clock maybe?||
idk that could be a shit idea but i'm just throwing it out there
Gay night, everyone!
||No, I agree it would be very cool; I might see if I can make something like that work as an overlay on top of the existing screen (so I can overlap the two clocks in Foundry as Ada suggested)||
eepy
oof- good luck
Hey y'all! Hope everyone is doing okay! My team is finally about to start Mission 2 this Saturday, and in preparation I've drawn another iteration on one of the upcoming major NPCs in Mission 2... ||Rita! Except this time she's been swapped with Jill Stingray frm Va-11 Hall-A who has become such a prominent character/NPCs in my group's TTRPGs she's in every single one as an NPC and universal constant! This Bartender now runs the Icebreaker and dropped smoking for candy but otherwise fits the glove extremely well for Rita, and I'm looking forward to everyone's reactions to her!||
||Shadow the hedgehog is devastated to learn about this||
Very cool looking though
i wish it was easier to build breachers as PC concepts
i also wish weapons like the breacher shotty and the cataphract's ram cannon existed as PC options
i rather like the rebaked ram cannon
Siege ram and juggernaut tortuga?
But playing around that when you can just delete enemies isn't as good
me when its the morning
Good morning
evil morning
true neutral morning
no way...
yes way
norway!?
Lawful neutral morning
Whenever I did an alignement test I kept leaning towards lawful good but I think it's because most of the lawful came from questions like "would you stab a stranger in the back for 100 thousand dollars" and I'm like no??? why would you stab someone??
i swear i first found this vid through tungle but couldn't find it so i had to google
and found the original tiktok
meh most tests are extremely superficial like that haha
Do the real test
Maid outfit, buttler outfit... Or mix?
Neither, I don't like dresses, skirts, or suits
sorry for long text but at this point why not just sharing
how i treat dnd alignment is
lawful good: most of your actions are to better others' lifes, you follow strict morals, and your vows and loyalty is hard to break. its not about following rules or laws but your own conviction.
neutral good: the ""normal"" person, you seek goodness but with a more relaxed and variable mentality.
chaotic good: same as before, just that you dont have any strict guidelines, and thus you are more unpredictable. in some extremes you can do good by "any means necessary".
lawful neutral: strong conviction, loyalty, strict morals, but what one would call a "grey person". for me this alignment is more for those that actually follow the status quo.
true neutral: not a real alignment a human person can have, rather reserved for a weird being like spirits or gods etc, or robots (?). for me true neutral requires the person to have barely no self volition, maybe even no emotions at all.
chaotic neutral: might feel weird but for me this is the "living la vida loca" (?). there's nothing specific that guides their actions, only doing what they want.
lawful evil: most of your actions are to better your own life in a selfish way. you have your own strict guidelines and convictions, but it is for your own benefit despite others. again its not about rules or laws.
neutral evil: for me this is just ""normal"" person, just that again, its more selfish.
chaotic evil: benefit for yourself despite others by any means necessary. so basically the alignment dnd gives to almost all villains-
Owl with glasses 🤓 ☝️

https://www.ascii-code.com/character/␞
another day, another wishing comma-separated-values files were using proper control characters
Detailed information about ASCII character ␞, also known as the record Separator
separators my estranged
one big reason these stopped being used is that there was no qwerty keys for it. these were used for punch card programming in ye olden days
replaced in modern lingo by tabs and commas WHICH ARE TEXT, NOT CONTROL
Boo hoo normal people like to read
these characters display as triangles, like the play button
hell, they could display as fucking anything because they're CONTROL CHARACTERS
"Hatsune Miku"-separated values
Gay morning everyone!
I really like writing a villain who is like
Evil in a very banal, real kind of way
Petty style?
No no

This dude is currently out in the arctic wilds negotiating with the natives for access to their resources, and brokering deals that massively favour the empire he belongs to. Those that refuse to bend the knee are killed. Despite that, he respects their culture and practices, even learned their own language, and regards them highly for their survivability and fighting prowess.
It's very much modelled on the early colonisation of America.
It's just business. He likes the natives but they're in the way and he's got a job to do.
This doesn't read banal to me but
"I like you and your culture, please make it easier for me" 4000 barbarosas Aiming at his position
It's laid back evil. The evil that springs from the cogs of empire turning as usual.
Corporate evil (Also known as Corporate)
"i like you, trust i really do. but i like myself more"
"empire said you either gotta bend the knee or die and well you aren't agreeing to the terms of this land arrangement so..."
... Thomas Jefferson
Good morning calliope 
Literally yes
none of that was banal or laid back. the dude was rampant and intentional. his only defense were fancy speeches
you could say nonchalant, or uncaring evil
woefully uncaring villain
Was difficult trying to convey what I meant
understandable
Though I think like
"The evil inherent in the cogs of empire turning" is the best way to describe it
Star Wars empire has a lot of posers that think they're like this. Until the empire also eats their faces
the only one that, to my opinion, holds this sway is Grand Admiral Thrawn
The dude is truly just plainly evil in such an unnerving, effortless way
and also hits that mark of "Love your culture btw. very pretty"
He's the main villain for my Lunar Exalt
There're secondary antagonists like the Bull of the North who got her father killed, and the Guild who enslaved her mother
But this guy
He burned down her entire tribe's home, killed the only person who looked after her when her parents were absent, and then nearly blew her up with a magic exploding arrow
She wants him so unbelievably dead
Hell hath no fury like a Lunar scorned
Insert "I'll pay the devil twice as much to keep your soul"
that guy in the miku binder
the only good version of jefferson
honestly, never understood the hate
it was clearly an AU for the characters of Hamilton the play
yeah but it's weird out of context i suppose
Nah she'll fucking burn that too
One Quajillion Burn Damage
May be slightly difficult because he's a Fire Aspect Dragon Blooded Exalt
But she'll figure it out
Might be able to ask an Abyssal for help
DBZA Freeza: "I've done the whole 'leave the children' thing but all they do is grow up to try to get revenge and die anyways! Really, I'm doing them a service by killing them now."
In context this is more pragmatic than it sounds
In Exalted, not finishing your target off risks them popping off as an Exalt much, much more powerful than you
I can retract that kindness if you wish, but then who's the villain?
And sometimes killing them anyway does that as well
I love you DBZA
my all-time favorite joke is from dbza kai 3: vegeta vs android 18
is it the cunt bit or is it the "agh my pride" or something else
the cunt bit



"Gonna cunt all over me with your cunty face, cunty boots and your... VAGIIINAAAA?"
And then he gets chiropactic
How’s everyone doin
Kinda tired rn
Mood
2 hours of sleep here 
I was awoken at 1 am to my friend calling me and telling me to call another friend because they possibly accidentally ate ceramic
Uh ?
It was not a fun three hours
Geez. I'm sorry, is your friend okay?
Are you okay???
I am fine, just very sleepy. They on the other hand….. was just really fucking drunk and thought they did and messaged the bud the shit which caused the whole fuckery
Unrelated, my chomolungma player is switching to the Imp. I let him do a full respec for this because he's (finally) beginning to look into character building instead of me pulling him along
the building is happening!
Played some more with ||cult influence|| clock ideas last night; ||I know it's supposed to be In Golden Flame, but what if we went a little bit Promare with Feather's color scheme?||
||THE GODS WERE RIGHT TO FEAR PROMETHEUS! plus it looks like a digital flame which adds a looooot imo hehe||
me when i dont know if i can click the spoiler
You can't
Or hope cascades /jk

||Let the final verses be written so the page may finally turn||
I really wanna see 👀
hmm, doing it that way means that you only need a transparent png the same size as the lower image
just saw the revised one, nice
are you planning to publish it by any chance?
Once they're done, yeah, I'll throw them all in a gdrive folder and add it to the GM resource sheet
yay!
oh shit oh fuck
you'd stab someone if they were evil
oh great heavens
I would not
good lord this is cool as fuck
super late reply but i was asleep and i have strong feelings about alignment in d&d so
That it shouldn't exist?
It's an extremely ancient holdover
-# shhh let them cook
lawful good: your heart is in the right place, but you lack the willpower to truly challenge evil. you follow your society's example of what a good person is because you believe that's the right thing to do in the eyes of the people who wrote your laws. you would abide evil if combatting it meant breaking a law or rule.
neutral good: you do what you believe to be morally good and beneficial to your own vision of what society should be. you would abide evil if your personal beliefs overlapped with it/you didn't believe the actions were morally wrong.
chaotic good: the revolutionaries who actually change societies and destroy evil. you have a vision for what a good, benevolent society could be and are willing to tear down what exists today for a better tomorrow. you would not abide evil.
lawful neutral: "i don't care who's in charge, as long as their policies don't affect MY life." you have your head in the sand and do what you're told to do because you were told to do it.
neutral: these are the people who don't care what happens to anyone else, or really themselves. lackadaisical and lacking conviction, you just go wherever the wind takes you and don't have any strong feelings about where you may end up.
chaotic neutral: you have a hatred for authority, but not because you have a hatred for injustice. you simply don't like being told what to do.
lawful evil: CEOs, billionaires, politicians. you've stepped on the backs of anyone who made the mistake of having less than you do and taken it from them on your way up. however, you haven't done anything wrong. you wouldn't dare; society has laws for a reason, you know. there's a natural order to things that needs to be maintained. in fact, you (or someone you know) are probably the one writing the laws in the first place. probably best to keep it as such, that way society keeps working the way it has been.
neutral evil: you take whatever you can from others for the love of the game. you revel in seeing others suffer. you have a vision for society: you at the top and everyone else at your beck and call. the alliances you forge are purely for your own gain, and you're willing to throw them away the instant it looks like you might not come out on top of the deal.
chaotic evil: raw, unchained ego. you need to eat and fuck. you'll kill anyone who wants to stop you from it. there's a reason most chaotic evil creatures are wild animals.
but yeah it shouldn't exist because it doesn't clearly identify itself as what it is and it encourages bad roleplaying and putting characters into boxes
law: i do what i'm told to...
chaos: i do what i want to...
good: ...for the benefit of others
evil: ...for the benefit of myself
I take it you don't like the lawful alignement 
lawful good is seen as "ultimate good" too often is all
lawful good is like. oh i can't throw a brick through the dictator's window because that would make ME a criminal too
Me personally I think alignements are cool but that people take it too seriously and try too hard to make everything fit neatly in clearly defined little boxes and jump too quickly to "this is not what X alignement would do"
i don't think characters need to be in boxes at all, yeah
i think it gets even dumber when you start talking about a character's alignment changing
you know, kind of like gender
my approach is entirely vibes based
"I think this character is Neutral Evil"
"Why is he Neutral Evil?"
"Idk it's my character and I say he feels Neutral Evil."
my approach is encouraging critical thinking skills in my players by having them actually think about what the character they created would personally think about an issue
i think a better alternative is to expand the whole "personality traits, bonds, ideals, flaws" thing
orderly vs rebellious
-# me shaking the "gender discussion" bag to lure the Eleonor into the topic
however, i do love your take on chaotic good
real "for better or for worse, an anarchist"
chaotic good recognizes that a lot of laws exist to maintain power structures that benefit lawful evil, so they're in direct opposition
based on your descriptions, Roland started out as Neutral Evil. He just wants to get himself ahead, and having to - I apologize for the image - eat where he shits is really doing a number to him
well here you can talk about authority vs anti-authority
-# I dont wanna conflate the names of specific economic and political ideologies like authoritarian vs anarchist
-# but i think .. it is a good way to frame it
Who are we framing
you
roger rabbit

ROGER RABBIT WAS FRAMED?!
who would do this
cuz like.... what the fuck is an anarcho-capitalist.. besides a terrible contradiction. these things dont relate well with characterization, only about politics
(spoilered for political semi-hot take, will remove post if flying too close to the sun) ||I will conflate this with specific ideologies; if you flip the typical alignment chart so that good is on the left side and lawful is on the top, it maps pretty 1-to-1 with the typical 4-quadrant political compass||
-# However much i believe political belief biases character, they're some terribly shitty people who are lefty
I can't read anarcho without thinking about this dumb meme every single time
but but but, the political compass is already known to be an insufficient categorization
which really circles back to how dnd aligment is just too fucking simple
i'll do the same: ||lawful good are the people who oppose authoritarianism on paper but still let authoritarians take advantage of the status quo because "hurting anyone is wrong, even if they're a fascist"||
You're definitely correct, people's beliefs are far more complicated than you can map cleanly, let alone on just two axes, and that's true for both ethical and political positions
political beliefs to me are like sexuality because i have no fucking clue where I'm sitting even though I do have some kind of beliefs
idk that's pretty gay
"That sounds a little gay, dude"
"It ***is ***a little gay, dude."
Good morning calliope
-# don't mind me, I'm just watching since I can't really add anything to this conversation
I do like the axis of "what would I do for my goals" and "are my goals selfish or selfless" or something like it
like i do already agree with June's first take here as an improvement of the chart
i'm gonna stop myself from rambling bc i can feel a little fire inside my chest wanting to go on a political rant about authoritarianism lmfao
back on topic yeah i think the chart should be simpler actually and not sold as such an important part of your character's personality
like this
this is as complex as i think it needs to be
Don't worry Juli, just make space
I don't even fucking know either
and then it gets tucked waay waaay waaaay in the back of the sheet and you actually come up with the nuances yourself
What would Neutral be in this context?
If you're not doing things for yourself or others, if you're not doing it because you're told to or because you want to, what do you do, why do you do it?
an unnecessary classification that muddies the whole thing up
exactly
a neutral person wouldn't be an adventurer
neutral is 99% of hobbits
<- plays neutral characters all the time
i think if i had to expand that to include neutrality
Neutral is the folks who is not an adventurer, but is in the mess by external reasons me believes
true neutrals just dont have convictions
<- momentarily turning evil by forcing june to expand their simple alignement chart
if spectator was a person
law: i do what i'm told to...
neutral: i do what i can...
chaos: i do what i want to...
good: ...for the benefit of others
neutral: ...because i can
evil: ...for the benefit of myself
lawful neutral is ultimate npc
"yeah i didn't vote, it doesn't affect me anyways."
"guess the police are going to be in our streets all the time now, but i don't care because it's not like i do anything illegal"
Wouldn't "I didn't vote because it doesn't affect me" be Chaotic Neutral then 
Or Neutral Evil 
no chaotic neutral is like
Or even Chaotic Evil 
Who the fuck is John Pork 
Simply don't use alignment, ever.
I will and you can't stop me
Inhales
<- evil
LETS ALIGN DEEZ-
dang the alignment topic returned
no because you think the law is absolute! so lawfulness must be morally good! supporting the status quo Is the morally superior choice
-# your nuts are unaligned??!?
neutral evil is voting for the authoritarians because you benefit from the power structure they want to create/maintain
If the law was absolute there would be no vote. There is a vote. It is therefore your obligation to vote. Lawful Neutrals would therefore vote.
I don't think morality fits into nine neat boxes
neutral evil is campaigning for local senate in order to skim off the top
lawful neutral is following the law because laws are meant to be followed
Nut alignment
And furthermore I think moralism is a curse
law: i do what i'm told to...
neutral: i do what i can...
chaos: i do what i want to...
good: ...for the benefit of others
neutral: ...and that's that
evil: ...for the benefit of myself
The Kingdom of Conscience will be exactly as it is now. Moralists don't really have beliefs. Sometimes they stumble on one, like on a child's toy left on the carpet. The toy must be put away immediately. And the child reprimanded. Centrism isn't change -- not even incremental change. It is control. Over yourself and the world. Exercise it. Look up at the sky, at the dark shapes of Coalition airships hanging there. Ask yourself: is there something sinister in moralism? And then answer: no. God is in his heaven. Everything is normal on Earth.
neutrality requires you to not be acting for the sake of anything
evil is for your sake, good is for others' sakes
I disagree on evil
Since we are talking about D&D and fantasy adventures and whatnot
i think evilness is simply selfishness
What about those who do things not even for their own benefit
neutral
(throwing discourse molotov) "I didn't vote because it doesn't effect me" can arise from multiple alignments, and therefore can only be mapped by adding a third axis "scope of concern", suggested categories "petty", "communal" and "universal"
Good question, I don't know, I'm not "Absolute Evil ™", but antagonistic forces that want to destroy the world for seemingly no reason and/or just to return to nothing because this entire world is fucked we might as well not have it, do exist (at least in fiction)
The fucks going on here
Nothing 
igf chat not being about igf again 
Discourse™
Typical lancer leftism?
We are arguing about D&D Alignment
And how it's like the gender dichotomy and how it should be abolished or something idk I lost my thesaurus I'm just throwing words together like an LLM
i think if i had to classify a certain fictional religion that believed that i would call them an extremist chaotic good with extremely misguided and flawed ideas about how to enact that good
they're actually a really good example of why the alignment chart doesn't work at all lmao
<- evil
it's more accurate to say they believe they're chaotic good
I'm evil
No I'm evil, because I am a white man
just to toss in my thoughts (i actually did before but no one read it sob sob
) i dont think lawful alignments should be read to be about literal laws, as morals and personality exist without a goverment. how can many creatures that belong to no strict society be considered lawful (something), if its not because they follow just their convictions? i think its alike mistakenly thinking that all paladins follow a god, when its their oath that give them powers. sometimes its an oath to a god yes but not always.
but anyways, i think this topic can last forever cuz afterall dnd is a world where goodness and evil are concepts you can actually grasps (like demons are actually made of evil like if it was a substance) so that makes it very different from our reality-- aka it can be way more exaggerated
thats my ted talk (?) imma go draw now some lesbiabs
Everyone else here is a poser
yeah there's a lot of things to be said about good and evil existing as tangible concepts in d&d lore
Funny reading pathfinder where a spell can outright do evil damage
They removed that in the recent version, believe it or not
tear the whole thing down it sucks and is built on a foundation of racism and moralism and
Idk what evil damage is but it's funny to conceptualise as it's being cast by a moustache twirling Disney villain
now all aligned damage are "spirit" damage where it attacks the soul directly
But my book doesn't say that 😭
How dare my book not be directly updated
No but I already have a however hundred many page tome gaining dust in my bookshelf
Yeah it is pathfinder 2e
Oh 2e2
i think tangible good and evil can be interesting but yeah it was used for some weird racism--
and now bc of feedback they are scared of giving anything a backstory (im so sorry owlins you deserved better)
I personally view good/evil better as selflessness/selfishness
SEE LÉO
I do think that, for all that I have no desire to play 5E beyond BG3, having paladin/warlock not care about alignment and instead be about specific oaths to an ideal/entity is a lot more coherent
it becomes especially complex when you have oaths like Treachery and pacts like the Celestial
Without them, how would the queers ™ have their tieflings?
ogre 🙂
dunmeshi
dunmeshi ogre > tiefling
yes i do the same. thinking that also allows as a GM to create NPCs that are (x) evil and not be a villain outright.
people are complex afterall
Demons as the embodiment of selfish creature, helping themselves for their own gain and slaying those in their way.
Angels being supportive, helping others and sacrificing their own wellbeing to strike down those that down tread others
evil doesn't mean villain and good doesn't mean hero
What if I do good things purely to feel good about myself
neutral good
Ultimately IMO any other definition of good/evil can land too well into being subjective
angels are even more exaggerated because a lot of them only exist to help in a specific event or to a specific person and once their goal is fulfilled they vanish/die
Is that not a selfish reason
"good things" needs to be defined
Stealing candy from babies
Easy one would be something like donating to charity
if you do benevolent and selfless things because it makes you feel like a benevolent and selfless person, you're neutral good
the difference is doing good to yourself despite others wellbeing. thats when it lands in evilness imo
right
-# Depending on how young that baby is candy could be a choking hazard, thus stealing is a good thing 
I'm a patron saint🙏
I stole candy from a baby, I saved it's life
I stole from that struggling mother of 4. If I didn't they'd have to pay taxes
stealing money from a different charity to give it to one that benefits you lands you more in neutral evil territory
Chaos/Law to me just feels more vibes based. Idk how to define that
i think eleonor put it well earlier
They're all vibes based to me
orderliness vs rebellion
would you break a law that hurts people? or would you follow it bc its a law and you don't want to be a criminal
i think a good dilemma i just thought about is, how would we categorize when good actions are being harmful. the person is good cuz thats their intentions, but they are doing harm without noticing, to a point where it feels evil for a third party.
Like, murder is illegal, I'm not gonna do murder, but not because it's illegal, I'm not doing it because it's murder are you out of your fucking mind??
THE FUCKS ARE GOING?!
Yeah they went that way
"sorry i know you're starving snd all but... they outlawed giving food to the unhoused. can't have that going on my record. let's see if we can get you a job somewhere and get you some legal food"
Run after them
vs "here you need this food more than me. don't tell anyone"
Seriously, he's all out.
Watch more Robot Chicken: http://asw.im/72fWCs
SUBSCRIBE: https://youtube.com/adultswim1?sub_confirmation=1
About Robot Chicken:
Robot Chicken is Adult Swim's long-running stop-motion animated homunculus of a sketch show. Witness sex, violence and 80's toy references collide through fan-favorite characters like the Hu...
not acting doesn't determine something
would you STOP a murder?
is it? Someone tells you to kill someone, is nothing determined by your refusal to do it?
which has its roots in eugenics and isn't scrutinised heavily enough
refusing is an act
I can keep popping off with these about dnd alignment btw
I am an alignment abolitionist
I will insult the concept of alignment until I'm dead
If alignment has 1000 haters I'm one of them
-# honestly thats a good question even outside this topic. would you stop a murder irl? i think i'd be frozen in place.
Man if there was a murder going on in front of me I don't think I'd even be able to process it before it happened
tho if the victim is someone i know, im pretty sure i'd jump to the attacker like an animal 
Fairly sure I would still be unable to process it
There is no axiomatic good or evil force and whoever tells you otherwise should be shot on sight as a misanthrope
-# i think thats a lot--
There are only people operating in an environment, and said environment incentivises certain behaviours according to material needs.
making my players fill in the alignment box on their character sheet with where their character is on Kohlberg's stages of moral development
marking in a spot underneath the pyramid
this character is a feral animal

Lawful is kinda ultimately “pro status quo”
yes
pasted from earlier: "lawful good are the people who oppose authoritarianism on paper but still let authoritarians take advantage of the status quo because 'hurting anyone is wrong, even if they're a fascist'"
Hopefully this all becomes relevant when Leviathan team has a crashout and Invader gets to tell everyone he does not want to shoot Steele in the face
coward
Or (ch3) ||Ignatius||
Or (ch5) ||Capella||
extra coward
That's his entire character
honestly, (act 2) ||Really confused about why Howl spares Steele anyways. Im not emotionally advanced enough to get it. Killing evil doesnt make you evil||
the test should be "would you kill a fascist? why or why not"
yes, no question
I don't think I would
paradox of tolerance
I think if you wanted an example of a lawful good character trying to make active change, stuff like Activism Lawyers or Charity Runners fall into the category of Lawful Good- they’re trying to use the establishment and adjust it in its intended way in order to make active change.
you don't have to tolerate intolerance
Now people who work for a charity may just be neutral good, trying to help out wherever they can and not thinking about the widespread tactics. But a charity organizer is ultimately trying to use capitalism for good
Which has SEVERAL flaws
Cause if I kill someone then there's going to be the people that want to avenge them, and then there's people who take it as a lesson that "oh so you can just kill the people who are a problem" and those can be on both sides of the problem which means more murders which means more revenge which means more murders and then it's just the roman senators assassinating each other every month all the time and like
christ i don't have the mental capacity for that
lawful good
"if you kill the Tyrant, are you the Tyrant?", thread locked after 16k pages-
superman mentality
But, I've never had anyone close to me die or get fucked over by prejudice
I've lived all my life basically free of conflict
Yeah I just kill people. It's not justified
bad superman writing really
So you know, I'm a tiny bitch baby carebare who doesn't know any better and who just wants people to not be bad
neutral evil: killing is fun
Tyrant cycling
Neutral?
really, we're probably at like 180k now
Surely that'd be more aligned to chaos?
no bc you're not doing it for any reason that lays on the axis of obedience or rebellion
hell me too. irl im a god damn coward that doesnt even commit to helping local dsa beyond my monthly dues. I run away and avoid avoid avoid. But hell if im not gonna kill hitler given the chance
the law does not apply
HE'S ALIVE!?!?!? /j
I don't think I agree with that reasoning
Al, we started this discussion with restating the alignment charts
i think personally i wish i had less to lose because the desire to actually change the world for the better at my own expense eats away at me constantly and i find myself sleepless sometimes because i can't tune out that desire
but i know i lack the conviction to actually lose things like my freedom or my life
Yeah but i close discord and open it minutes later and as per usual there's hundreds of messages so I miss stuff
oh i totally get it, just said it for info
but the minute the gloves come off and it become apparent im going to lose one of those things regardless, i'd be going out in a blaze
everyone has that line where shit hits the fan
there are some people with very ... upsetting to say the least ... flags on their property in my neighborhood
"I wish to be a martyr and change the world for the better" I say, as I lie on my sofa, typing on discord and continue to watch Minecraft gameplay on YouTube for 2 hours because I'm scared of job applications and lack the energy to go outside after I woke up at 11am
meeeeeeeee
the most i've done is throw away someone's sign. makes me feel like kind of a wuss but i have to be honest and admit i like being sble to come home and play video games and talk to the funny people living in my phone
I donate some money I won't miss to charities and hope for the best
I don't give money to people on the streets because I don't have any on me but I have a credit card full of potential euros
I grumble when the people in power are saying the problme are the people "who don't want to work" when the richer get richer and richer and then I vote for those who don't apparently hate the poor or those with a different skin tone and cross my fingers it won't get ignored or turn out they're also the worst
That's all I do, cause I'm a coward and I'm scared of stepping out of my comfort zone
-# i saw bad sings in streets before but tbh i was afraid of removing them barehanded as i was told they hide tiny blades to hurt whoever removes them
i'll shout someone down or rip up a westboro/GHF sign in someone's yard but anything that actually would land me in jail i'm afraid to do
i greatly admire the people who are brave enough to lead the revolutions and i wish i was them but i'm not. i give leftovers and pocket cash to people on the street, i volunteer at food banks, i am involved in local mutual aid groups, etc., but i'm not going to end up on a poster as the face of anything bc i'm too afraid to give up what i have
whats great about that is that if you do get injured (in the US), no matter if your attempt to remove it is destruction of property, boobytraps are a muuuch worse crime and they would be mega ultra liable for injuries
You are often surprised by how much good people do in their lives and never make mention of it to anyone simply because it's a moral inclination in them to do the right thing.
Donate to a cause who's benefits they won't see.
Help someone on the road with a busted tire.
Pay for a colleges snacks/lunch.
Give clothes that are no longer needed to shelters.
Doing good isn't for the recognition, you do it simply because it's the right thing to do. And that's enough.
fuck i'm still working on getting to the point where i'm less comfortable living a lie than going out in public without considering societal expectations and whether or not i'll be called a slur
why do i care when people call me slurs? who knows. working on that
i am the president of an intersex rights association and im affiliated with 3 more
and thats...a lot already, and i still feel its not enough.
hell yeah
I use a lot of my income to help friends with bills and just get them nice things
i think the core of my belief system could be condensed into "if we don't have each other, we have nothing"
100 bucks is not much to me, but i remember when it was life-changing 5 years ago
I so that sometimes but like
It feels like the bare minimum
So few people do like the bare minimum
society, and american society especially is plagued with this individualism that literally kills people
Because a lot of people, like you said, are fearful of loosing what they got.
So doing what seems like "the bare minimum" is a lot in uncertain times. Which is why you do what you can and therefore it's enough to help people in a lot of need. Every little bit adds to a bucket.
in conclusion d&d alignment is archaic and flawed
No no I see it
I'd space him
Anyway my point is my character isn't gonna shoot the big bad evil in the face but someone else in the group probably is and if nothing else that's gonna be great dramatic tension 
i think if the power structure of the world wasn't so immensely skewed towards injustice and protecting the perpetuators of it using lethal force, i'd be a bit more of a rebel
i got into trouble in college being involved with people who were doing more than me and realized i didn't have the nerve to be as punk as i wanted to lol
At that point, you just got to ask what is better?
The outlaw justice of kill him and move on, when calliope and by extension a LOT of other people see if you do evil you just get domed
or
If you do bad stuff you get repromanded by a procedure to show that we are trying to do better by showing all the crimes done and tossing him in a cell. At the end of the day, it's still a human. An awful example of a human, but still a human.
You could be shooting the big bag evil in the face by having me glue the gun to your hand and making you pull the trigger 
"started out"? What changed???
nothing i think?
I know you said “in conclusion” but I do wanna bring up my just thought of potential interpretation where the axis of good vs evil is selflessness vs selfishness and lawful vs chaotic is using vs ignoring the status quo.
Lawful Good will try and improve the status quo
Lawful Neutral will try and enforce the status quo
Lawful Evil will try and exploit the status quo
Chaotic Good will try and remove the status quo
Chaotic Neutral will just ignore the status quo
Chaotic Evil will try and replace the status quo outright
Neutral Good will adhere the status quo (positively)
Neutral will obey the status quo
Neutral Evil will adhere to the status quo (selfishly)
he's just tired of getting shit on
So he's still neutral evil but he's a loser
The alignment system is always gonna be flawed but imo this is the interpretation I think I can find the most interesting since it may change depending on the nature of the status quo
which, societally, morals do
what is evil to one society could be good to another
depends on how the laws got written
my favorite part of pathfinder wrath of the righteous being the lawful neutral character in the evil realms executing people who say "sorry" when bumping into you
I smell a boyfailure
So like, examples:
Lawful Good: Civil Rights Lawyer
Lawful Neutral: Court Appointed Prosecutor
Lawful Evil: Corporate Defense Lawyer
Chaotic Good: Rebel
Chaotic Neutral: Hermit
Chaotic Evil: Fascist
Neutral Good: A “good Samaritan” for lack of a better word
Neutral: Average citizen
Neutral Evil: HOA President
Release the fujoshis
Going beyond the alignment discussion, Lawyers are genuinely such good examples of “exploiting / adhering to the status quo” imo because they represent how that can mean so many things
(Act 2) I wouldn't kill ||Steele|| because ||the Cult has a machine that can bring people back from the dead, and I don't want them bringing him back for some reason.||
||Steele 2||
||Steele, Enriched by the Flame||
||Heat-Treated Steele||
spoilers...
||Steele, exactly the same but now his ego has absolutely no limit||
||In Golden Steel||
||haha so true guys||
Act 2 BIG spoilers: ||Imo, I think Howl in trying to bring Steele back alive is both trying to adhere to and test one status quo while also trying to completely replace another, which really subverts my alignment interpretation and is also really interesting to me just from a writing standpoint||
||Genuinely my favorite part of Howl- feels very Leverage of her||
||i can do it too you know||
||Dead Men don’t pay their debts||
||Can Union really truly punish Evil? Tune in at 5 to find out!! -Howl||
||I’m running my Howl as using the prosecution of Steele to test if Union is really all it’s cracked up to be, so yeah exactly that||
This chat looks like a fuckin scp article
||Ipswitch: Today we are here with Howl to see what's more effective: Union's measures or a fucking blackbeard to the face!!!!||
||”We totally would arrest Steele, but um, we don’t have jurisdiction in Calliope”
“Okay here’s Steele in a cage, prosecute him cowards.”||
we're talking about some alignment stuff relevant to act 2 and the punishment of evil

Genuinely, I think watching Leverage + Leverage Redemption is a very good way to get ideas on how to narratively write justice outside the law that isn’t just murder
The revenge plans get so elaborate and they’re so fun to watch
||I to can write spoilers||
And Leverage has a ton of fun with its antags ranging from “this guy’s kinda complicated and sympathetic but we’re still gonna destroy his life” to “hey wanna watch some lesbians disassemble a neo nazi cell?”
It’s pretty camp in a lot of regards is a way a friend described it, but that’s kinda what makes it fun. I mean we love IGF for a reason lol
Huh, second time I hear about Leverage




