#Game mode suggestion: Ranked Royale
1 messages · Page 2 of 1
When I think of a ranked grinder I think of people spending hours in front of the computer, playing a game that brings them no joy, unleashing wrath upon everything that breaks their focus and costs them the game and their rating.
100% grantee ou that is not it
I reject this axiom. Now go supply proof.
I'm imagining the extreme case, but I believe that this is, in fact, and extreme case and not a unorthodox case.
Humans are irrational.
They take drugs when it destroys them
They pay more than what they believe is a fair price for coffee.
Playing games they don't enjoy is far from the rarest case of human irrationality.
are you irrational
I am human, therefore I am irrational.
how can you just assume every rank grinder is irrational
or gets no joy into gaming
although this isnt proof but me myself enjoys grinding ranked
"Every"? Was that what I said?
then how much of these ranked grinders get no joy
ofcourse some dont but a few bad apples dont ruin the basket
I do not have access to that statistic, but whatever proportion it is, it's enough for slice of life comics to depict it, and not lack resonance from the comments section.
well would it be enough for you to oppose ranked?
im sure that there are few people who rages everyday or gets no joy out of it but still plays it, but most comp players would enjoy it
I think its safe to assume that
wont these people that get no joy in the game still play sar even without ranked anyways
I can tell you that taking Joshua's observation out of context as advice was the best thing I did this past year.
(at least as far as SvR was concerned)
"A strange game. The only winning move is not to play"
what all have in common? they died
anyways to be the devil's advocate on this:
minecraft
but that's still quite vague
cause servers may have their own ranked system or whatever
oh yeah
they are over 20 years old so it's a bit unfair to blame it on "lack of ranked", lol
they are still bad examples to point out
and counter strike 1.6 is perhaps not dead
they are good examples, because I said "in history", then I was asked to point to examples, then I gave examples
nothing bad on my part here
history doesn't reflects today, we are talking about today
games that are alive
we do not apply suggestions from games that died
stop being bossy man... I will talk whatever I want about, got it?
and that game probably has it's own community-driven ranked mode
i wouldn't be surprised
atleast there is a reason why they recommand using a plugin that check your entire PC off hacks
Lol
sorry bo$$
Most sports.
And before you bring up the Olympics, that doesn't explain the players who neither record their match results when playing nor train for competitive play, as can be most visibly seen in school clubs for 2- or 4-player sports, which usually don't send all of their members to participate in competitions.
Most sports. elaborate on them
soccer for example definitely has ranks similar to mmr/elo
laliga (pro league) for example which has a leaderboard
elaborate on them.
You can't be saying that if I ring up my friends right now and play a game of soccer with them, I'd be participating in a ranking system?
I was talking about a pro league
Before you bring up the Olympics...
im not
And here I thought I was the pinnacle of pedantry...
you wouldn't, you could apply to a Sunday league which has rankings
Do all games of soccer exist only to train for some league?
no main purpose for games are to have fun
no, that's the equivalent of sar players hosting scrims with a circle of friends
nba doesn't use an elo/mmr but still has some sort of rankings
team based games are gonna have team based ranking
And here I thought I was the pinnacle of pendantry...
"Don't bring up the Olympics" brings up NBA and Sunday Leagues instead
I dont understand
Ah, so only skilled players would desire to create private lobby games. Is that what you're implying?
Would those be classified as scrims?
i thought you didn't like strawmaning
anyways, you cannot host private matches in sar with a circle of friends and then just post the results whenever you feel like to the staff and hope they are going to give you a medal for it
same as you going around and playing with your friends soccer or whatever and then sending the results to competitive organizations
you see, you first have to sign up to those organizations
This is another thing infuriating about these debates, it feels like I have to do the thinking for my opponents, too.
There are many soccer associations. They do not account for all games of soccer. Definitely not most "friendly games".
yes casual games
when you talk about competitive sport, i'd assume you do not talk about playing in the back of the yard with your friends and more about playing with professionals that specialize in sort of stuff
- Point taken. But please don't leave anything to implication if you don't want me to interpolate.
- Oh, so that means that all players attend private matches in the hopes of-
- You have to be kidding-
And which would a public game of SAR be more analogous to?
a public game of sar is casual? whats your point
literally any park really
or any public space where you can just join kids
to play football with
they do not even have to be your friends
the problem with this analogy it's that it mixes people playing a game competitively and then a game that has competitions being hosted
you jump between these points
SAR has only one competition area centered around
while football has thousands of ranked competitions
To prove Jatta's point: There exist popular games with competitiveness at least on par with SAR that do not implement ranked systems.
that doesn't mean sar wouldn't benefit from it
My primary examples were low player count games, like tennis and volleyball, it's you guys who latched on to the most hyped game of soccer
also the fact you couldn't come up with one proves it
also we give you the benefit that the rules that apply to an irl game apply same to an online game
soccer is the most popular sport for a reason
That would be Television, not rankings.
Also, quickly googling "burnout from competitive soccer" yields the point I was trying to prove...
so we are jumping to another point
give me a resource
What are the 3 points I'm jumping between, and how are they unrelated?
i do not even wanna consider that i have to explain how a physical game is more different
than a virtual game
I cannot post links.
Burnout and Mental Interventions among Youth Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Studies
this can get entirely off-topic if i did that
and it will derail entirely for this subject
I mean I rather have a burnout than not playing soccer at all
id eventually play it again anyeays
Mental burnout is one of the forms of burnout mentioned in the article titled above.
mental burnout is still tied to phyiscal burnout
you see, your brain is sending these signals
to most parts of your body
what kind of serious mental burnout you'd have in sar if you just move your fingers and your hand a little
do you kick anything around the room while playing sar?
do you constantly out of breath
while playing sar?
do you constantly get dehydrated cause of sar?
any sore muscles?
sorry but no
incomparable
While that is a well-documented occurrence, it's your turn to supply articles that prove that mental burnout in sports is primarily caused by physical burnout.
In fact, a quick google search already turns up counterexamples if you use the term "Burnout from competitive esports"
when you have a burn out doesn't it come from the thing you used to really like
really
If you need to capitalize to prove your point, you might be losing footing.
check on google
how does my brain communicate with my body
you see when i copied this it copied with the caps too
I already ceded that this is a well documented occurrence
My counterpoint is that it is not the primary cause of mental burnout.
Also, your "physical burnout is the cause of mental burnout" objection falls flat in the case of esports mental burnout.
post screenshots
Yes. Yes it does. What does this mean from players who really like SAR?
esports, we are talking about football here
would that not make it good? burn out comes from games people find enjoyable
I wouldn't be competitive in a game i hate
cant you also get a burnout from a game that doesn't have some sort of esports too
and if by sports you mean esports
then i can only say that i'm amazed by your ability to mislead a conversation
If you can dismiss analogous relations occurring in the esports community, I can dismiss analogous relations occurring between other cases of physical burnout causing mental burnout.
I don
't have time for this, class in 22 minutes
Not wasting my prep time on being your personal chatbot
i'm pretty sure i was clear enough i was mentioning to real life sports, and you were clear enough too by mentioning olympics as an example
Google can literally argue with you guys on my behalf
ChatGPT's too much of a yes-man though
so we research your arguments?
maybe.
i mean honestly, if a chatbot jumps between online gaming sports and real life sports then it must be a very old chatbot
that is not capable of completely memorizing what they talked previously
and keep itself to the subject
why is burnout such an issue, if you occurred it its obvious you need to quit/break if they dont its their ignorance.
when i first started sar hell I loved it about 150 hours in even i was burnt out i had a break.
that's also another point too but i gave him the satisfaction of actually debating his argument
honestly it should have stopped when he mentioned real life sports
maybe they are from same root but they are from completely opposite sides of the branches
My primary examples were low player count games, like tennis and volleyball
i can assure you that our romanian Simona Halep goddess is a ranked individual in tennis
and i'm pretty sure there's something similar things for volleyball too but i'm quite afraid of losing my messages perms or getting my first warning because of advertising
there's a leaderboard for volleyball
could be both
i mean hosts in sar can stream their games
why does that make a difference
anyways the point he started from
im sure sar comp was atleast interesting based on rukis most popular vids
he knew he lost the football comparation argument and then he switched to another
and tried to imply he is talking about the same thing
idk but this has to be a form of trolling
no offense
not sure why he brang up sports cause those definitely has ranked
so he can bring up playing it locally in the backyard? idk
The reason I have to jump topics so often is because I have to account for the possibility that you guys will cherrypick the cases of any context I choose that would benefit your arguments, and refuse to pay attention to anything but those cases.
This is why it is becoming excruciatingly difficult to resist the temptation to sling a singular insult regarding both of your intelligences and use that as justification to disqualify you from the conversation.
I need to use analogies to back up other analogies because your arguments are verging on unfalsifiable.
Before you mistake unfalsifiable for unassailable, let me clarify that "I have a dragon on my shoulder. It is invisible, massless and formless." is unfalsifiable.
Besides, this isn't how onus of proof works. You failed to prove your point. It's still your turn to prove it. I was trying to speed up the process by supplying esports examples as why your argument is unsound.
The two of you have some audacity calling me a troll; I'm the one getting fatigued of being forced to come up with hyperpedantic explanations in the futile attempt to prevent trite objections.
I was mentioning olympics as an exception to my example.
-# (This is an off topic question, probably best to continue in DMS, but)
but why do you continue to defend your criticism, even until it enters the (walls of text) phase?
And I don't seem to see you enjoying this either
Because I cling on to the naïve belief that everyone in the world is a reasonable being, just that some have deeply entrenched false beliefs that require time and patience to debunk.
I also do not want the conversation to be overrun by impulsive arguments.
Can I tag out? Please?
By tag out, you mean go back on track to the discussion, right?
I mean get somebody else to argue so that I won't have to worry about the discussion being one-sidedly in favor of ranked without my input.
Kind of like tagging out in sports.
I really hate how this seems to have turned into basically a competition that I'm thinking like this.
I wouldn't worry, someone makes a suggestion, some support it, and some are against it. It lets the developer see these perspectives, and judge them.
But Pixile isn't a Greek god. They don't elegantly sit in throne, as they watch a bloody tournament battle and grant the last bloody winner a bloody blessing.
-# Pixile watches a battle of 64 animals fight for the survival of the fitte-
They don't need anyone to prove their ideal, because they are the real judges at the end of the day. Yes, it makes their job easier if someone proves their ideal Superior, but 70% of the time that's an argument
And that's one of the last things that the devs want, it also influences the forum channel in a negative way.
Being real, no one really knows how to debate around here, at least most
Can't keep expecting an L and Kira situation, it's a reason why Ryuk found Kira the most interesting
some people, from sweat, probably
literally nobody does
If you want to visualize what this means: 2vs2 wrestlers, one has enough from one team, high fives with his teammate and rests
you are doing this to yourself, always, you can leave discussion at any time
even if discussion will be one-sided, as not sure if there is any tag partner this time. not many people recently here. For me, discussion is not interesting enough so not gonna tag in.
This translate to "my entire purpose here is to make the opposition speechless by bringing confusion instead of actually trying to prove my point by actual valid claims"
If your entire reason you are using these feedback channels to practice your mental gymnastics i have to tell you that twitter or reddit might be better platforms for that
The staff expects us to use this forum to give helpful feedback, you are doing nothing than derailing conversations to satisfy your ego
Please, do us all a favour and move this trolling to a more suitable platform than our cute animal game, we do not need to flood these chats
Your analogies to do not apply and they are reaching
Your analogies are good as saying that the reason you are not eating vegetables is because you hate fruits
You failed to prove your point the moment you switched to another topic to try to prove me wrong in a previous topic that you couldn't give a counter point to
No brother, you had to stick to your argument about sports and how is that any related to sar, this is not how it works
Maybe next time you will learn not to stay ontopic before you realize that you brought yourself an argument that you cannot back up
...do you speak for Pixile?
Because it sure sounds like you're going hard on this disagreement, and I also see you have ideas of what can and cannot be discussed.
Oh poor you, well you see, you had the choice to refrain from going into efortless tangets to make people speechless by confusion instead of trying to have a claim that's impossible to argue against
You do not try to reach a common agreement, you are doing cheap shots to reach your own personal "winning condition"
Please do it, you are not adding anything to the conversation
Hmm... that doesn't sound like Depths...
Do you really feel it necessary - or wise - to do the curb stomp thing?
I'm pretty sure the guidelines that i am expecting everyone to read before posting reflect that
You've been sure of a lot of things.
Still unsure that you have read them tho
Would you like to highlight which guideline you'd like to draw attention to?
Ok i see they are not part of the guidelines but still something you should read first before posting
Hmm. Okay. Okay.
And do you feel like you have honoured the spirit of this paragraph?
Unfortunately i got carried away in expectations that we will eventually go back into the current topic, which we did not
That's one way of putting it. Depths has expressed that he would like to cease his participation in the discussion. Without entering into the whys, I expect that you'll be honouring that request.
Still tho there's another part in the guideline which asked us to be civil
Sure. It does ask that.
Do you feel like depths has honored the spirit of it?
I admit that I only caught sections of it. I was too deeply engaged in another debate that was going on.
But I do know that I saw at least several points where the discussion became less about the topic and more about one-upping or diminishing participants.
In any case, I think we can agree that the discussion needs to get back on-track.
He's over it alright, but you both need to chill out as well alright, because being real- I don't think these kinds of debates strengthen the idea @frank pike , very long debates are very specialized, none of us here can debate like that period. Me, you Path, NRG, and Depths.
It doesn't matter who started it first, but both defender and attacker just add fuel to the fire. Discord am I right? 



If anyone here is sure that their super specific statement, can counter the super specific argument,
If you are that sure, that you are that correct.
-# I'm not joking or insulting anyone here, this is just what's been realistically been happening in the forums.
I need you to go Clone sar, and make that idea, then you can ask a pull request from Pixile if it works.
This goes to the one who created the idea, defending it with their life.
And the attacker who wants that idea dead at any cost.
