[ Player Reports Suggestion ]

[cinder echo]

Instead of Denying ❌ player reports where the report can't be accepted because the user is already banned OR:
Denying ❌ reports when the report is valid but is only a verbal warning..

You Reviewed 📂 tickets where the user was verbally warned, or already Eco-banned, but can't (publicly) take any further action.

Prevents the mislead of people thinking their reports are invalid (Which may make them not report it again)
And for instances of verbal warnings, would ensure the user understands it has been handled and any further reports Would result in approved actions.

--- Example
❌ REPORT IS DENIED

Your proof is invalid.

❌ REPORT IS DENIED

But it actually wasnt and heres more information:

----------------------OR WHAT COULD HAPPEN IS BELOW, ABOVE IS WHAT'S IN PLACE RIGHT NOW.

❌ REPORT IS DENIED

Your proof is invalid.

Report has information

Here is the information

So if the report was accepted and it resulted in a verbal warning or user is already ecoban, but not a moderative action, the reaction should reflect that.

This would help the user reporting, site control understanding what happened, and on-lookers checking reports.
this also helps site control keep tabs on verbals

@outer arrow reactions pls

[crude sorrel]

Yk there is a message the sc provides when he reviews it.

[drowsy monolith]

^

denied
user verbally warned

[cinder echo]

Yeah I've mentioned that in the suggestion...

[drowsy monolith]

Why would they be confused then

[cinder echo]

Face value it's not good to look at for no~ reason

[cinder echo]

Theres an obvious answer to that question

❌

[drowsy monolith]

There’s an obvious reason

they even ping you

and link the report to it

[cinder echo]

❌ Opinion denied

Your opinion is valid but can't add it to the suggestion

[drowsy monolith]

💀

[cinder echo]

see wat i mean

[outer arrow]

there is always a reason when denying player report

[drowsy monolith]

the fuck that doesn’t make sense at all nore related

[cinder echo]

just make it an emoji meaning theres something done with the report or additional information

not just denied ❌

[drowsy monolith]

they say the reasons

[outer arrow]

useless

[cinder echo]

No, not useless.

[outer arrow]

yes it is

[cinder echo]

in your opinion

[drowsy monolith]

I’m not gonna argue with stupid useless suggestions

[outer arrow]

yeah, sc uo opinion

[rain lance]

aren’t u supposed to be banned

[cinder echo]

Having it as denied causes distress in users for no reason

Just make it something where its accepted but there is no formal punishment

[drowsy monolith]

ACCEPTED
USER HAS BEEN VERBALLY WARNED THANK YOU FOR THE REPORT

[outer arrow]

what distress

it literally tells them the reason

[cinder echo]

❌ Denied

But the report was accepted

[drowsy monolith]

big difference smh

[cinder echo]

It's confusing to me, let alone the 13 year olds

[outer arrow]

by accepted report its classed as punishment was given to the person

[cinder echo]

just make a neutral option

[drowsy monolith]

Usless

[cinder echo]

Make it an information thing rather than accepted or denied

[outer arrow]

but it literally has the information

[drowsy monolith]

they say it in the messages

[cinder echo]

Report was accepted but only as a verbal warning

[drowsy monolith]

mhm

[outer arrow]

ALL denied reports have reason

[cinder echo]

❌ DENIED

Report was accepted but only as a verbal warning

[drowsy monolith]

yep

[outer arrow]

yeah thats what i did

[cinder echo]

so the report wasnt denied then

not fully accepted either

a middle

[drowsy monolith]

APPROVED

Report was accepted but only as a verbal warning.

[cinder echo]

they deny it bruv

and what about ecobans

[outer arrow]

i dont even think reports that have verbal warning are logged as denied

[drowsy monolith]

they are

[cinder echo]

❌ DENIED

Report is totally valid but user is already banned, so we make it look like the report is invalid

[drowsy monolith]

denied user was already verbally warned

[cinder echo]

You can't use the same thing for Invalid, False reports for Correct, valid reports.

[outer arrow]

Your player report has been denied, user is already banned.

[drowsy monolith]

usually when’s already handled the deny it

Accepted user has been banned already

[cinder echo]

User is already banned, thanks for your report.

much better, cleaner and better information for the user.

Means it wasnt invalid or false like the reaction would suggest at face value

[drowsy monolith]

not when there’s a stated reason

[outer arrow]

if they read the little ifnromation in the message they would know its valid

[cinder echo]

Not anyone else seeing the reaction on the report

[drowsy monolith]

exactly

[cinder echo]

It's more harm than not by not making an informative option

[drowsy monolith]

NO ONE ELSE GIVES A SHIT bru

someones reported denied ah there must be a reason

let me look why

[cinder echo]

Report denied: Must be false or invalid

[drowsy monolith]

no

[cinder echo]

Report has information? Let's read

Like what's so wrong about that?

[drowsy monolith]

If you have fucking common sense there’s always a reason

[outer arrow]

BUT EVERY DENIED REPORT HAS THE INFORMATION

[cinder echo]

It's a roblox game

[outer arrow]

HOW MANY TIMES DO WE NEED TO TELL YOU

[cinder echo]

Just change it to say theres information

[outer arrow]

nah im done

electrix have fun

[drowsy monolith]

leaving this stupid ‘argument’

[cinder echo]

Like actually whats the problem??

If theres information regarding the report, don't deny it the same way you would with invalid reports.

[drowsy monolith]

point as already been made

please read up for further arguments thank you

[cinder echo]

❌ REPORT IS DENIED

Your proof is invalid.

❌ REPORT IS DENIED

But it actually wasnt and heres more information:

OR:

❌ REPORT IS DENIED

Your proof is invalid.

Report has information

Here is the information

[drowsy monolith]

Literally what happens already btw

[cinder echo]

What happens already is the top one

[warm mulch]

Justice for my report

[cinder echo]

Hence the "OR"

[drowsy monolith]

#🚶player-reports message

#🚶player-reports message

Need i do more

[cinder echo]

Yeah so as I said: What happens already is the top one

idk why ur spamming

The suggestion is to implement new things

Why are you saying the old bad one is what happens already

we know

[drowsy monolith]

Why are YOU spamming

[cinder echo]

ur spamming links to existing things like that affects the suggestion for new things

like what

[drowsy monolith]

thing is this is a usless suggestion that already as a perfectly good system

[cinder echo]

what ur linking is bad, makes the user think its false before reading more. Just let them know there is information

read this again

❌ REPORT IS DENIED

Your proof is invalid.

❌ REPORT IS DENIED

But it actually wasnt and heres more information:

----------------------OR WHAT COULD HAPPEN:

❌ REPORT IS DENIED

Your proof is invalid.

Report has information

Here is the information

[drowsy monolith]

And I’m done arguing my point

Read what i said before

your point exists already

[cinder echo]

my point is to add Report has information

link those messages

if it exists already

for some reason u think my point is to add ❌ REPORT IS DENIED

[drowsy monolith]

your suggestion makes no sense

[cinder echo]

yeah this just looks like a you issue

[drowsy monolith]

It ALREADY EXISTS

[cinder echo]

i gave an example

[cinder echo]

💀

❌ REPORT IS DENIED

Your proof is invalid.

❌ REPORT IS DENIED

But it actually wasnt and heres more information:

----------------------OR WHAT COULD HAPPEN IS BELOW, ABOVE IS WHAT'S IN PLACE RIGHT NOW.

❌ REPORT IS DENIED

Your proof is invalid.

Report has information

Here is the information

[drowsy monolith]

Your suggestion makes no sense just like you

[cinder echo]

how can i make it more obvious

[drowsy monolith]

and you spamming that isn’t helpful

[cinder echo]

💀

ur a lost cause

leave the suggestion

[drowsy monolith]

it already exists

leave

get out

[cinder echo]

❌ REPORT IS DENIED

Your proof is invalid.

❌ REPORT IS DENIED

But it actually wasnt and heres more information:

----------------------OR WHAT COULD HAPPEN IS BELOW, ABOVE IS WHAT'S IN PLACE RIGHT NOW.

❌ REPORT IS DENIED

Your proof is invalid.

Report has information

Here is the information

[drowsy monolith]

STOP SPAMMING IT

[cinder echo]

You keep saying Report has information

already exists

[radiant grove]

not needed anymore when accepted

plus

vw's are not stored anywhere

so hard to keep track of

[drowsy monolith]

IT
You know just like you can’t get me to see the point of your suggestion I won’t get you to see my point

[cinder echo]

This would be easier to see for site control rather than them seeing an X reaction on a report

[drowsy monolith]

case lost cause no one won

[cinder echo]

Not specifically that emoji

but something not DENIAL meaning it is a valid report

but is only a verbal warning or user is banned or theres additional information

[unborn bane]

glazes suggestion

[cinder echo]

For anyone new:
I am suggesting we use:

Report has information

Here is the information

Instead of

❌ REPORT IS DENIED

But it actually wasnt and heres more information:

[ashen brook]

Banned player suggesting this btw

[nova creek]

this system makes no sense

it's fine as it is now

[cinder echo]

not as good as it could be

[rain lance]

Banned player suggesting this btw

[cinder echo]

hence the suggestion

always improve

[rain lance]

there’s not much to improve

it’s either th report was accepted or denied

doesn’t need to go farther then that

[nova creek]

I'm literally a former sc and this system just overcomplicates thing

[rain lance]

fr

[cinder echo]

So if the report was accepted and it resulted in a verbal warning or user is already ecoban, but not a moderative action, the reaction should reflect that.

This would help the user reporting, site control understanding what happened, and on-lookers checking reports.

this also helps site control keep tabs on verbals

[nova creek]

I just said this system makes no sense

it overcomplicates things

[cinder echo]

you're throwing a tantrum

explain what doesnt make sense

[nova creek]

why would sc need to do anything besides accepting or denying a report

and then explain why that report was denied or state that the report was accepted

[cinder echo]

to help clarify what happened with the report

[cinder echo]

they do that anyway

[nova creek]

brother, they already do that

[cinder echo]

❌ REPORT IS DENIED

Your proof is invalid.

❌ REPORT IS DENIED

But it actually wasnt and heres more information:

----------------------OR WHAT COULD HAPPEN IS BELOW, ABOVE IS WHAT'S IN PLACE RIGHT NOW.

❌ REPORT IS DENIED

Your proof is invalid.

Report has information

Here is the information

[nova creek]

a checkmark is a pretty obvious indicator that a report was accepted

[cinder echo]

And a denial reaction is a pretty obvious indicator that a report was denied

But the report wasnt denied and was accepted, but with additional information

so change it to an informative reaction instead of ❌

[nova creek]

not a sensible system

[cinder echo]

stop throwing a tantrum, what isnt sensible

improve it dont just flat out deny it

[nova creek]

okay you know what, you're like talking to a brickwall

[cinder echo]

I am talking to a brick wall but giving it every possible chance to say what they dont like so I could change it

[high jungle]

It's unnecessary but I upvote

It should be smth like

[nova creek]

you already get the information when a report is denied

[cinder echo]

It could be any reaction

just the idea itself

a neutral option

[nova creek]

it's either accepted or denied

[ashen brook]

Banned player suggesting this btw

[cinder echo]

It's either Accepted, Denied, or has information.

Like the user is already dealt with

[ashen brook]

Why can't we just leave it as it already is

[nova creek]

it shows you weren't sc

[ashen brook]

Why overcomplicate stuff

[nova creek]

it really does

[cinder echo]

it's changing a reaction to a more neutral one

if thats complicated

[ashen brook]

It's just useless

[cinder echo]

ur cooked

[ashen brook]

Lmao

https://tenor.com/view/high-intelligence-specimen-gif-26711283

[cinder echo]

sheep smh

[nova creek]

@outer arrow and this suggestion was marked as appropriate?

[cinder echo]

[ Player Reports Suggestion ]

[ashen brook]

Calling us sheeps when your most normal suggestion is fucking useless

Is this the biggest achievement you can get

[rain lance]

ladies ladies calm down

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1471488682417590334/1471488682677768320/holy_aura.gif

[cinder echo]

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1404248951309467700/1448759914158620917/togif.gif

[ashen brook]

https://klipy.com/gifs/an-iq-too-high

[high jungle]

Your player report has been accepted , however, first offence is a verbal warning.

It shoulb be like this

[high jungle]

Uhh???

[cinder echo]

Nah because the report didnt have anything done

they dont track verbals nor does it have moderative action

so the report has information but the report may be valid

well it is valid but its neutral

not accepted nor denied

same with reports on banned users

not accepted nor denied

so a neutral option is needed

[high jungle]

So

Like this?

The other one

Bcuz i dont know where is it

[ashen brook]

He's

BANNED

[high jungle]

This one

[high jungle]

Reimanasan?

[cinder echo]

It'd be a new emoji

[ashen brook]

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/568636503614291980/1476615369484402812/copy_34E04ED3-9988-4B13-BC75-FAFF76936E09.mov?ex=69a3163a&is=69a1c4ba&hm=3465d757d26b80e79810c5e273ad3034364fd4c448c674286dd0ddce1ec1ac8b&

[cinder echo]

more neutral

[ashen brook]

Who else

[high jungle]

Ohhh ok

[frank canyon]

accepted means the user has been warned, banned or ecobanned

[high jungle]

I read banned sugg

[cinder echo]

ty

[high jungle]

YES SC

[cinder echo]

So when the user is given a verbal, or the report is valid but user is already banned, its a neutral option instead of denied

thats what the suggestion is

[frank canyon]

pending emoji

its used for reports being reviewed

[crude sorrel]

That's like saying let's change the wrong answer mark on a test from red to green cuz it stresses people

[nova creek]

another former sc btw ^

[spiral meteor]

What is this suggestion 💀💀

[cinder echo]

If the answer on a test is accepted but doesnt contribute to the overall score it recieves a neutral mark

Instead of a denied mark

for a better comparison

[spiral meteor]

No

0 reason why it should be added

[cinder echo]

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1403359703697981472/1475232783252066327/i-guess-bro-v0-vbkfueewkzig1.gif

[nova creek]

another former sc btw ^

[drowsy monolith]

user up votes his own suggestion

⚠️ then starts spamming the same shit when he knows he’s loosing

[cinder echo]

theres no losing im just helping you guys understand

if you cant it's nothing to do with me

[radiant grove]

i mean if this is only going to be used for vw's and such

i guess it should work just as fine

[cinder echo]

Anything where the report may be valid but denied for any reason, just change it so the user is aware theres information blocking the report from being accepted.

[radiant grove]

sc could just introduce new rule where if its a vw, and when its accepted, it still should be given description that its a verbal warning

[radiant grove]

when report is denied, the reason is given along with the decision

[cinder echo]

This would be the same but denied changed with information

[radiant grove]

no point then

a denial is denial regardless if its invalid or valid

reason is given along with it

[cinder echo]

The problem

If its valid make the reply informative rather than using the same format as a denied report for invalid reasons

[radiant grove]

the report checker should give reason as to why the report is denied (even if its invalid + the reason its invalid)

basically works just like normal report system

im fine with this being used to keep track of vw's and such

[cinder echo]

Just with a changed emoji that would help keep track of reports against banned users or being used as a verbal warning 🤝

[full mica]

another ratio i see

[nova creek]

he finally left

[glass hawk]

Did he get banned bro

[rain lance]

lmaoo