ANTI HBE SCRIPT

[paper eagle]

Can we hurry up and implement a ANTI HBE / HBE banning scirpt?
Shits literally dirt easy to code.

-- Hitbox detection script
local Players = game:GetService("Players")

-- Define acceptable hitbox size range for each body part
local HitboxSizeLimits = {
["Head"] = {min = Vector3.new(1, 1, 1), max = Vector3.new(2, 2, 2)},
["Torso"] = {min = Vector3.new(2, 2, 1), max = Vector3.new(3, 3, 2)},
["Left Arm"] = {min = Vector3.new(1, 2, 1), max = Vector3.new(2, 3, 2)},
["Right Arm"] = {min = Vector3.new(1, 2, 1), max = Vector3.new(2, 3, 2)},
["Left Leg"] = {min = Vector3.new(1, 3, 1), max = Vector3.new(2, 4, 2)},
["Right Leg"] = {min = Vector3.new(1, 3, 1), max = Vector3.new(2, 4, 2)},
}

-- Function to check hitbox size
local function checkHitboxSize(character)
for partName, sizeLimits in pairs(HitboxSizeLimits) do
local bodyPart = character:FindFirstChild(partName)

    if bodyPart then
        local partSize = bodyPart.Size
        
        if partSize < sizeLimits.min or partSize > sizeLimits.max then
            return true -- Hitbox size is out of acceptable range
        end
    end
end

return false

end

-- Function to handle player character appearance
local function onCharacterAdded(character)
local player = Players:GetPlayerFromCharacter(character)

if player then
    if checkHitboxSize(character) then
        -- Take action: You could kick or ban the player here
        player:Kick("Hitbox manipulation detected.")
    end
end

end

-- Connect character appearance to the function
Players.PlayerAdded:Connect(function(player)
player.CharacterAdded:Connect(onCharacterAdded)
end)

--

could always delete the "take action" part and revamp the script to log suspecious users to a database, for sc to investigate/manually ban in the connect character to the function part

[glass sable]

dang

[heavy bronze]

Yap?

[paper eagle]

fat?

[heavy bronze]

No

[glass sable]

just code for the game

not a foreign language

[paper eagle]

https://create.roblox.com/store/asset/2222057402/PhantomVisuals-Eye?externalSource=www

heard thats pretty good, all tho outdated ^

[heavy bronze]

Luau is so confusing

I dont get it

[glass sable]

its not that difficult to understand what it means. just its difficult to write it

nxi what do you use to learn code

anything specific?

[heavy bronze]

Thats what i mean

I know how to code just luau is stupid

[paper eagle]

this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LfaMVlDaQ24

25 hours long

[glass sable]

dam

[rough tundra]

Sure

[rocky glade]

i agree

god if u dont know how to code

coding looks like a whole foreign language

make it simpler

[glass sable]

i feel like its easy to understand the purpose of what its saying but to put it together is difficult

[spark matrix]

Real

cs50 is pretty good, came in clutch first year

[distant mango]

yes

chairman needs to make one

[distant mango]

I would suggest against doing stuff like this as it is extremely hard for a person to detect HBE especially when factoring in lag and stuff like that

but good idea

if a script can detect HBE better than a person then leave it up to a script imo

obviously include a logging system so SC can investigate or whatever but yeah

[paper eagle]

intention was so sc could eco ban, instead of the roblox ban idk how ban systems work

[distant mango]

really depends how accurate it is

if you can 100% detect HBE then just do an auto ban, people are not that good at detecting HBE unfortunately so yeah

if not then manual review

[paper eagle]

its really somethjing this game should have tbh

[limber estuary]

this wouldnt work for dod, as the script is for R6, dod is R15, and like others have said, this would likely be extremely unreliable when the server starts to get laggy

[paper eagle]

this doesnt do with anything server sided, eg laggy hitboxes, this is client sided and checks if a player has manually increased hitboxes

roblox hitboxes eg "humanoidRootPart" is always at a default set value

and if it is changed client sided, the script detects it

[limber estuary]

that script is server sided

[paper eagle]

its client sided

[limber estuary]

well it isn't because its connected to player added, if it were client sided that wouldnt be there

[paper eagle]

runs on the client end

[paper eagle]

this doesnt make sense

[limber estuary]

well

it does

[paper eagle]

not really

[limber estuary]

¯_(ツ)_/¯

[paper eagle]

• thats a very basic script

there is so much more that would need to be added into script to actually make it function

[paper eagle]

mb just realised lol

it is server sided

[limber estuary]

mhm

[paper eagle]

still dont see how that could impact detection

• instead of automaticlly banning players

i will revamp this 100%

[limber estuary]

delay betweem client & server may make it so the hitbox is within acceptable bounds on the client however outside of said bounds on the server,

hence leading to false positives

[paper eagle]

but u can code script to check player every 30 seconds, and then if player comes back true (player suscpious) it can get added into database and store with points

a more sus player would have higher detection points

and a laggy player would be on a lower end

.
-- Log system with DataStore
local function logDetection(player, partName, currentSize)
print("[DETECTION] Player: " .. player.Name .. ", Part: " .. partName .. ", Size: " .. tostring(currentSize))

-- Save the player's suspicious activity in DataStore
local success, err = pcall(function()
    local data = suspiciousPlayersStore:GetAsync(player.UserId) or {Warnings = 0, Detections = 0}
    data.Warnings = data.Warnings + 1
    data.Detections = data.Detections + 1
    data.LastDetection = os.time()
    suspiciousPlayersStore:SetAsync(player.UserId, data)
end)
if not success then
    warn("Failed to log detection for " .. player.Name .. ": " .. err)
end

end

i dont code

but this shit is dirt easy

so clearly someone that actually codes for job can do a much better job of this

isnt gonna be very hard

[shell yacht]

if its server sided cant it check the ping of the player and the server tps to see if its lagging and disregard it when its lagging

or calculate the appropriate hitbox size with lag

[heavy skiff]

thing is

the creation of a proper anti hbe is tricky

you'd need to account for the shooter's ping, the server ping and the discrepancy

[paper eagle]

this isnt based on hit detection

[heavy skiff]

and then have a proper verification that would always return true but false when something's wrong even with all variables considered

[heavy skiff]

better to just actually discard the shot instead of falsely flagging someone

[paper eagle]

false positives would be minimal for a non hbe, whereas a user would be pinging every 15-30 seconds

[heavy skiff]

again

you check on the server

not on the client

you never do checking on client

[paper eagle]

it would be serverly

server sided

this is what head hbe looks like

it will check if a player has ultered hitbox sizes based on the default values

nothing to do with lag

nothing to do with getting shot

it just checks the values in this

and if values are ulted, eg this

it will flag a player add a point to the database, sc ect could review

all flagged players can be added to the database, and each time a player gets flagged, lets say 30 seconds per check, if true = +1 point

1 hour of gameplay = 120 times getting flagged

which means its pretty obvious someone is using hbe

[rotund inlet]

suuus

[rigid storm]

lua is the easiest programming laguage to learn tbh

[heavy bronze]

No.

[paper eagle]

yeah so

https://gyazo.com/191331e3092c511a42b6bb468d203f7e

some improvements have been made

[glass sable]

dam

wish i knew code like you

[sick perch]

Ping doesn’t hbe most of the times

If a person was never in that area but a shit fires there and damaged them lag doesn’t have an affect

That’s most cases of hbe in aegis

[lusty willow]

@paper eagle can you elaborate on how this isnt a banned suggestion

Implementing anti-exploit. We already have one, and it's constantly being improved upon.

[paper eagle]

its not anti exploit

its anti hbe

and i think we all know the anti cheat is shit

[lusty willow]

is anti hbe not the exact same thing

hbe is exploiting

thus anti hbe is anti exploit, no?

[paper eagle]

no

but

atleast there is effort in this suggestion

unlike the others

[thorn matrix]

🤓

[sick perch]

This game doenst have that good of an anti cheat

And the admins don’t give it credit when they let exploiters play unnoticed

[rocky glade]

thats y ur not banned

the exploit logs didnt find u

[lusty willow]

tbf we do a pretty good job of tossing the exploiters

[rocky glade]

y blud say "we"

hes been an officer for like a day

[lusty willow]

acktually a week

🤓

[sick perch]

The ones that hide it a bit is what I mean

[lusty willow]

i mean if you're aware of any exploiters we've missed feel free to send a clip over\

plus while unmoderated servers around like 4am were more common last year its recently been really hard to find a server that doesnt already have someone with mod on who could ban the exploiter

[thorn matrix]

more then 90% of the time if we send a clip the player doesnt gett banned

[sick perch]

Ray6 guy

Had like 20 clips on him

Roblox banned him before aegis did

And Roblox never and cheaters for a century