#Toxicity enforcement in Discord
1341 messages · Page 2 of 2 (latest)
I'm not
reason why i downvoted is that the idea of general toxicity is fine as long as its not much and in a joke way
its only a bad thing when its repeated but
i hate cosmomystic
dude
striking people
for calling others
a dumbass
trying to ban the word dumbass is crazy
dont you think thats outrageous
like i fully understand if someone is harassing you and what not
just ignore the rest of what i said
The ISSUE isnt in the word dumbass
if its blatant harassment then yeah strike them for that
It's in how you can only express yourself by insulting others
if someones getting a little bit annoyed i dont think its that bad
Your only way of communication
as long as its not repeated 100x like nuggets did
@surreal trellis @granite pendant and anyone else involved, apart from the pinned message, are there any points of relevance you want taken into consideration
Is disrespecting others
cause he was out of line
and no we're not giving AA staff mod perms in the main discord
Super sent a long list of examples, did you check them?
please do not strike for saying dumbass
someone suggested that?
person who made the post
half of them contained people just jokingly telling others
it was one of the first things I read in here, and i only read 5 lines
1k messages in this post
Its truly disturbing how easy you all take insults for
its not like its a blatant death threat
Like atleast value yourself
im calling someone a dumbass jokingly đ
still i dont think striking someone for calling a dumbass or a fat fuck
learn to have some fun thats the most disturbing thing
i dont think anytime ive insulted someone here ive ever actually been serious
thats my point abt the toxicity
The main point of interest is condensed into the fact that:
- there is recurrent and un-punished toxicity that is borderline harrassment
- people HAVE approached ahrd in the past about it, they have been redirected to the officer core as they are supposed to undergo the chain of command, and no clear outcome has occurred
- officers occasionally join in on "the fun"
- often turns into harassment cases and unnecessary harsh punishments are taken that may not have been required if it was dealt with earlier
if it seems genuine and non-jokingly, and its repeated
I apologize but where I come from, fun isnt insulting others
this post is fine
then ur missing out
you have to have the worst childhood
if you havent insulted someone
Absolutely fine by me
then strike for it
like honestly
Again
but i think some people are a lil too sensitive and cant tell if people are joking
like listen to urselves im sure many of you have called others or insulted others jokingly
The issue isnt in the word dumbass
personally IDC abt toxicity but I can see why it should be enforced against
you understand how absurd it is
yeah exactly
The issue is in the context you talk in
to get striked for insulting others especially ur friends jokingly]
And the meaning you have
could you direct me to the list of examples these points are based off of
There is aegis somethinf
this post was made because of mrnuggets #1246262570340454462 its all in there
get ready to be sent 1500 examples of nuggets in a feed back post
AHRD case details may be retrieved with the permissions of the DoE, but other examples have been linked by super above
would you like for me to send examples in dms?
^
if you don't like what's being said send in an appeal
why are there downvotes on this
But like
hating
riiiiight
@static elm this too
the people who downvoted is the funniest bit of this post
if all it is is
"hey x person harassed me"
"dm an officer not us"
then no I'll pass, ill refer to the list of examples ive been pinged abt tho
what yâall doing abt nugg btw
idk its bieng talked abt
you can see how absurd it is
bro what are we meant to do
didnt you also get toxic though
it wasnt one-sided
give him a verbal warning for like calling others dumb
give him a verbal warning for trying to express his views in a not so nice way
raid event was crazy
give him a warning for toxicity ??
it is essentially that, but we dont know where exactly it got til
till*
direct me to stated messages please
did you like
its not even over the top toxicity
I do not recall being toxic to the same magnitudes as I was advised by my seniors to back off
đ€·ââïž
sorry im not going to gather proof of every single little thing for a feedback post
https://prnt.sc/UT-bEnBYoH4l
but heres something
different post
hours afterwards
still quoting him and quite obviously triggered
I shall provide context to this rq
go dms I have 16 screenshots
regardless of the person people who argue in feedback threads arenât doing anything but clowning themselves
dw i agree with you that nuggets was 100% out of line
it just reflects the inability to put forth an intellectual argument
feedback should be given reasonably
^
also you must try to understand that it was 5 am and I had dealt with seven infections on the border, with the guy saying I had an issue with skill
my mental status was not of the best levels
make one joking insult and immediately receive 14 strikes for toxicity
i downvoted because i do not want people striking me for insulting others jokingly
im already on my last strike i think
this is NOT what would happen
why were you online at 5am dealing with infections đ
literally
dude considering the sources thats been pointed out by super
Ok so argument:
-people are being toxic
- officers aren't being strict enough about it
====
counter argument:
- the "toxicity" is mostly just a joke
- most of the quoted examples are hardly "toxic"
is that an accurate summary of the whole thread
it might have hapopened
if itâs a joke it obv wouldnât, it would be for extensive arguments that went on despite mod warning
of course it would help when people go too far in their arguments, but itâs gonna end in random people getting strikes for making one comment
i think thats good
look at supers stated sources
but nuggets was toxic
most of it are jokes
striked for those
I like the core suggestions but that doesnât mean there are parts that need to be edited
if I wasnt going to, who would?
the game would be unplayable, ARD HR would be blamed for divisional inactivity, and so many other issues!
our mental health is on a steady degradation (stemming from https://discord.com/channels/412291659347263498/1246262570340454462) and we've had a hell of a week this week!
extensive arguments should already be handled with the given system without the need to start striking people for the smallest bit of toxicity
let people struggle.....
its dod its ok
dod being unplayable is a good thing
for all of us
we can actually gain back our moral sanity
right... till a repeat of the january and february div checkups happens...
what else am I supposed to say if Iâm not making fun of cow for being fat on a daily basis
keep it to dms!
idc abt his sources, as I said Iâm only drawing on written suggestion itself. Just because super included those examples it doesnât meet thatâs what the rule would manifest as if instituted
its not that hard
im going to report u to harassmne tnow
u can joke around and shit but not every1 sees shit as jokes as corny as that sounds
aegis conversations decrease by 300%
Iâd like to think our officers arenât stupid and identify the difference between real toxicity and a joke
ermm
the yolker abuse in aegis chat will be gone tho
I mean even here I can see some people complaining about âtoxicityâ even in the form of obvious jokes
âkeep it to dmsâ
no more calling him an egg
guys i say we just let this discord become like oretary
lets post 1500 slurs daily each
they often miss key details and let things go
some people may be sensitive and pointless insults simply ruin their day
ofc its not like people should just stop publically reprimanding others
but the limit should be enforced better
you donât need a new rule or penalty to stop arguments that should already be punished with the given system
what makes it a joke is it being recognized as a joke between two parties. If someone just says âhahahaha your aim is ass hahaâ they wonât get striked right away, but if the person tells them to stop or they continue after moderator warning then yeah
yes
Officers dont even bother to moderate toxicity, atleast lately.
Most toxicity I've seen is in pms
then again, you should also have the skill to be able to approach the officer core via dms and explain
honestly as long as i dont get striked for calling cosmo a dumbass
then im fine
or calling cosmo stupid
fat fuck
because i dont think many people take it that serious
etc
its not like they have to cater to you
if someone is sensitive they can inform the officer and get the person to stop
because most of the time its just jokes until someone actually tells them theyre being harassed
canât really blame the other person for making one joke, but if they continue to do so even after the other has expressed obvious negativity they should be punished
in which case then officers will handle it
shut up cutdata
fatdata
only reason cutdata wants this thread is so he doesnt get constantly harassed as a fatass in aegis chat
This is generally where people need to be drawing attention to the issues where they're facing. If they continue the conversation instead of notifying a moderator, or retaliate in the same manner there's no point in complaining about inefficient moderation when they're both told to stop the conversation instead of strikes being handed out
^^^^^
Factual
and from what ive seen thats when they actually take action
500lbs to 189lb
Banned
ok then tell an officer if they donât do anything tell an overwatch
boom case solved
yes!
but often people get ignored even after doing so!
that is the point of this forum
people then approach ahrd, who are known to take harsher actions
cutdata works his magic yet again
and then the overwatch tells them to go tell an officer..
well just say u already did
ur just gonna yoyo back and forth if you take it up the chain of command really
if someone approaches a UC saying an officer hasn't handled something properly they wouldn't be sent to an officer
@minor sand FUCK YOU
so they go to ahrd, who conduct an investigation and reveal a toxic history of the abuser, leading to harsh punishment
Hey hicom
which is very unnecessary
my point ^
Bro @elfin quail why do u have wastelander role ur aegis
i think the hard part of this is that so many people have different views on what toxicity is
The main issue is.
You approach an officer, the officer tells the other party to stop, the other party starts mocking you for being sensitive to their insults, the bigger problem is that officers tend to agree with them on that.
So in reality your asking the officer to moderate what he himself isnt following.
the reason i downvoted is because i dont wanna be striked for insulting my friends jokingly and i cant trust officer+ to know what the limit is
Then there is an issue with the officer
inform OW, they'll handle it - if this is truly a recurring issue we can also just make a notification to officers to handle toxicity better, and a notification to overwatch to be on the lookout for similar issues, and we monitor from there
not doing their job
so really this suggestion is "improve officer core"
if you're able to provide a fully fleshed out report with credible evidence proving that the officer core is truly lacking we can do something about it
i shit you not Ive seen ow and toml join in with the other party
people have left aegis and dod as a whole as a result of it
most of the time all that is brought to hicom is "offifcer suck" / "officers dont do x" / "fix officer core"
we can't work with that - besides preliminary action
@static elm stop bullying me with "edater" wtf
shut up edater
there are many instances where officer core strikes others just cause the guy copied what the officer did
fl im edating your mama
Super did have a very good argument on the current issues within the office core, I personally dont feel like if the officer core undertakes any major duties that they can lack in.
Most of them do duty states and trainings which are often done in a very fine manner
but im not gonna find evidences because i am too lazy for that and id leave it to people who actually care about this game
@strange glade look at this guy
she can make me some good curry
WHAT
this thread and the raid event thread is literally twitter in a nutshell
i mean ur fighting fire with fire
you post a suggestion that negatively affects raiders = war
then you post a suggestion about toxicity because of what people said in the suggestion
= more fire
minus all the onlyfans advertisements
and the football gifs
you know what
buff pksf
my new suggestion
if someone goes and clicks on a sketchy link we can change that
true, but some stuff was simply not required
there were people replying with two word answers to paragraphs lmao
250 shield hp isnt enough
cancel aphrxnium
clearly buffs sthd gonna have to say no
cosmos favourite player^
đ no
how is it even fun to watch soccer
boring sport
at least people nearly die playing football
thatâs the entertainment
@wintry gulch
both suck tho tbh
bro did not see the 2022 wc final
anyways back to on topic guys
bro did not watch 2016 euros
cause most people cant create a valid response
if it has the word euro in it I am NOT watching it
Ok
or are too lazy to read
hey at least our world champion is actually champions of the world..
sorry cosmo
fl this is why ur staying as a spc
sorry cosmo đ
cant follow the rules of feedback posts
so you wont be an officer if you cant do that..
well the main discord rules apply here
the suggestion bans apply here, and i suppose staying on topic to the convo here
specific rules
can we just have an officer on standby when suggestions that include very hostile nerfs or buffs
are posted
to stop all toxic intentions
not a bad idea tbh
cause they'll think the other person is stupid due to their opinion on it
thats not very nice of you
add âbuffs pksfâ to a list of banned words
thats a good way to stop toxicity really
nerf pksf to banned suggestions
-
A reminder is being issued to the officer core to handle issues involving toxicity.
-
A notification is being issued to the overwatch core to monitor officers, and be receptive to complaints from community members and act accordingly.
-
All members are advised to contact an officer if faced with toxicity or other forms of harassment, as opposed to escalating the situation.
And finally, a little word of advice from my end, not every little jibe deserves a strike, nor is it "toxicity". But if it does go too far, feel free to contact moderation.
This thread is now being locked.
@surreal trellis if you have further comments to make you can DM me to reopen