#AIA bans // Corruption and Transparency
2910 messages · Page 3 of 3 (latest)
no, i wouldnt do the report unless theres evidence i could see
but we dont get any proof about any situation aia deals with
walac stop yapping ur exposing ur self
we aren’t too good for saucy, saucy is too good for us
GET RID OF ALL AIA EXCEPT FOR BUZAREC AND KAZU
Why should we...?-
this thread isn’t really getting anywhere
Why should you 💀
Okay so you were impatient during the initial contact of your false ban and claiming there was no evidence despite us needing evidence for bans to be made in the first place, and this is the same person saying AIA is corrupt?
so why are you saying why should we wstop arguing if we only know 1 side
can we keep this focused and serious guys
oh my gawd this aia is using dots on fucking discord definetly ban them
💀
Haha skill issue
I’ll make it equal for all parties!
Again, it depends.
as toml?
L for him
🗣️🗣️🗣️
Pretty much, but argue if you wish. I am just trying to tell people not to insult others for doing their responsibilities in the group. Plus it is a rule anyways, ya'll should behave yourselves
so this whole forum... was to make a dig at walac by gaining public attention due to to6xic's ban?
no
my point was for more transparency
it seems... very much like that
GET RID OF ALL AIA EXCEPT FOR BUZAREC AND KAZU
🗣️🗣️🗣️
Maybe 💀
right now
every ban that wasnt handled right
in a moderation sense yea kinda
buddy is only using emojis now he exposed him self to much
GET RID OF ALL AIA EXCEPT FOR BUZAREC AND KAZU
ight discord moderator

cmon can you just give an example of someone’s status, reason of ban and how long AIA gathered evidence?
Your ban is an awful example
proof okay if its sent its fine but its the fact you guys arent transparent enough
any good example
Unless it’s your own ban, no.
in that case the stage is yours, provide one
Toxic boutta make this the Berlin Wall revolution
bruv
GET RID OF ALL AIA EXCEPT FOR BUZAREC AND KAZU
That goes for a lot of the bans asking to be represented in here 💀
sorry i dont have more to say guys i dont really keep up with the day-to-day bans
so lets say hypothetically: im accused of alting and i get the evidence for my ban, am i allowed to tell people the evidence
We just inflate the numbers by false banning people dw
cuz if its my ban it should be my choice for what i should do with the evidence on me
i mean
LMAOO
W FUCKING MANS
W
bro made an animation just for this
Dunno, a lot of bans happen so can’t say off the top of my head
pack ur stuff
i made it like a month ago when friedo asked and it looks like it predicted the future
3 pages long
OK MAYBE KEEP YOU TO
Man is going by no evidence of this.
HE AINT DENY IT
this seems like a forum for people disgruntled with AIA to try and gain public sympathy 💀
Defund aia
Ask me about it in DMs, I’ll look when I can.
it feels very made for toxic's ban
WALAC GOTTA GET BETTER WITH UR WORDS PAL
pretty much
Equal question, equal response
GET RID OF ALL AIA EXCEPT FOR BUZAREC AND KAZU
if you really wanted walac gone... this forum wouldnt exist
you would be talking to toml/IC rn
STOP WITH GRAMMAR UR NOT THAT GUY PAL
My sarcasm is less noticeable
IC ALSO CORRUPT SO ITS USELESS PAL
I’m corrupt guys
Nah no way
Defund dylanjkl
i wonder why
I can confirm aia is corrupt (my alt is in aia)
THERE IS ONLY ONE WAY WE SOLVE THIS AND ITS BY PROTESTING AGAINST THESE CORRUPT RATS
that is so brief and short of a reason that there is no actual valid reason to judge why it was rejected
no wonder buzarec is such a W aia
My alt*
suchhh
🤓
your own evidence proved you wrong
i was actually excited to read some suggested policy changes for AIA (im the guy that likes just seeing policy suggestions) to be disappointed with useless drama
funny prank haha
this is so sad
we werent supposed to tell anyone bro
shit my bad
he will never have time
I will eat your skin.
Sometimes that’s the case
sorry my dog stepped on my keyboard
if ur yapping right now right here you got time smarty youve been at it for a good hour
can this get you banned
i mean the fact that it takes super long is annoying but from my experience walac is one of the best aia's
Wow it’s like I don’t do anything in AIA itself, you have no idea what I do within AIA itself
nothing
Because I’m actively replying to you guys, I don’t have extra arms or anything
cutdata and matxdata helped each other get in aia
You keep telling yourself that buddy
Ok bro hmu 😼
why would you be replying to us ur duty in aia is more important right???
I think I’ll be the best aia public relation
this has gone from a aia transparency thread to personal attacks, if you have nothing relevant to contribute to the thread, stop talking in here
bet bet
I was a decent SC NGLLLLLL
Because I have priorities, you’re just being overdramatic now
Gotta invest into that general grievous fit
Fr
yo typing in this for 2 hours is some bad ass priorities pal
why yall so focused on aia transparency
Considering I’m getting pinged for everything I say, no wonder
the games almost dead
you attacked walac for classified evidence then said he wasnt fit to be uoc when he said no
why so serious
only thing alive is the community
It’s about sending a message
i get pinged alot i dont respond tho
if i dont want to
im talking about your method of delivery
That’s because whenever I don’t respond I’ll get called unfit, inactive, etc.
there are ways to ask for change without going at someone head
cutdata is corrupt
ur the one not responding to dms for 2 weeks lmao
how does this make sense
ur contradicting ur self pal
nah dip sherlock
in fact it'll just make people defend them more
this some valid shit no cap
why does bro keep exposing himself
ur calling ur self unfit
its not us no more
its you to man
Well he’s not the only one messaging me lmao
Directorate involves more then just the UOC.
walac has a entire division to operate
you wasted like an hour yapping here instead of doing ur duties
No duh his busy between that and his irl life
aint doing so good ait
Walac is probably the most merciful UOC that we have had
If you want to get rid of him
It won't end the best for you cases.
@wise ledge Cut it out or you'll be striked. Michal has already warned all of you.
what are you talking about pal
were typing
getting warned for speaking is mind blowing
this is crazy
bros mad
Maybe I do, maybe I don’t
and idk when he warned me
they tryna silence us fr
(he has no idea how AIA works)
what worked best for me is sending reminders
no hes to busy yapping here
i dmd walac like every 4 to 6 days orso
Haven't you been speaking in this chat for 2 hours like you accused walac of doing? It is above. This is your last warning 😐
no personal opinion allowed sir!
no ive speaked here for 30 minutes max
Guys, I think we had enough
well like i said Bacons ban appeal took 2 months
Let’s go chill
can i not type no more?
''more complicated''
seems to be if things are complicated
idk how aia works
my best advice would be to contact corpsii about it if you think walac and/or other aia arent doing their jobs correctly
You're all welcome to continue conversating, just don't insult innocent people. If you have any problem(s) like what you're mentioning, then you should bring your concerns to a member of ToML+, not publicizing it for public attention.
@wise ledge You as well. ^^
I understand you are passionate to want to share your thoughts
lol
im instigating it
i fucking love when a random suggestion actually gets political like this
how is this not locked
saving this
or closed
my bro is actually typing a storm
id like to bet 4 shinglings it's a long version of "everyone shut the fuck up"
thank god
i was hoping to come back to see corpsiis response
corpsii cooking something
ive been watching him type for like 20 minutes
I could never
last time i typed something like this was when i was answering a question on how to make a duty state in-depth on mobile
Bro is gonna run outta space to type even with the upgraded amount nitro allows
😂 😹 😭
discord going to crash when he presses enter
he still didnt finish yet??
I agree that more can be done internally with AIA to help fact-check, authenticate, and validate incidents brought forward. I also agree that for certain situations, as much evidence as possible is better than nothing at all.
However, these changes would be kept within AIA, shared with HICOM. As AIA continues to revamp and develop itself after the recent transparency changes that coded gracefully made (mainly for HICOM), there will be more and more opportunity for us to improve the way AIA conducts itself. Is it perfect? No. Is it corrupt, inefficient, unethical or otherwise? No.
"Corruption" is a harsh accusation here, because that's not at all what you're referring to could be described as. AIA already tries to do exactly what you're preaching here, and it's something I've tried to develop further after becoming their AO. Evidence for most major-offenses is provided to fellow AIA, HICOM, and those involved when necessary. Just because a perpitrator does not know what evidence is used against them doesn't make them innocent. AIA are not required to publicize evidence on that scale, but they- for the most part- have it, and provide it to HICOM and other AIA members.
Most- but yes, not all- bans are given fairly and justly. Could some of the current ban severities be lessened based on the context? Sure, I could get behind that. But that doesn't mean that suddenly- or that we already have hundreds of innocent people banned wrongfully.
I would love to see the certain "dms" you're referring to that you want to make public, it could've been an accidentally mismanaged case but I'd have to know all the details before deciding that. I'm assuming that incident is what sparked this thread.
AEGIS does not ban people simply because we assume they're doing wrong @ anyone saying we're "guilty until proven innocent". We strongly try to prevent that mindset. That's part of the reason many people who likely should've been banned faster than they were went unbanned for so long. Should there be some more safety measures to ensure power isn't being abused, a step wasn't missed, the proper context is acquisitioned properly? Totally, already on it. AIA- and AEGIS moderation itself- is improving as time goes on.
As for the transparency concern, I apologize that the initial plan for AIA transparency hasn't come. Honestly I completely forgot about that shout, and I wasn't the AO of AIA at the time. I don't know exactly what was planned for that but I can speak with AIA, HICOM, and potentially other admins to make sure we're doing something good in that regard.
Nobody has ever been banned for having an alt that has not played DoD. hommie I have like 10 alts that AIA, HICOM, etc doesn't know about. I'm not dumb enough to use them on DoD either. A larger effort could be made to help prevent these bans, however, since a lot of these bans are from people who simply didn't know any better and honestly should probably be given a lot more leeway with how they were treated. (not that they were treated poorly, just given a harsh punishment for a relatively innocent rule break assuming it wasn't malicious).
"Trust me bro"- as silly as this is lol, it is the reality for the public. We are not going to publicize every ban case, every evidence ever recorded on every possible offense, just so the public can throw their two cents in on how a certain situation was handled. As shitty as it sounds for all of you who aren't in the loop where you can see or request the evidence/context and be in the position to recieve it, that's how it is. This doesn't mean I'm disgarding what I said in previous paragraphs, fyi.
🤯
HOLY
I'll have to reread the shout and identify what is appropriate to change, thanks for bringing that up. @ what I said above too.
also
I forget where I read it but I do have time to stay in the loop with AIA cases.
aegis intelligence security bureau
Maybe every single case doesn't get my attention, but I do check often and I read through the discussion channels, giving my two cents, suggesting actions, etc.
Gtg, lmk if I missed something or if you need something addressed.
Should be on again in a few hours or tomorrow morning.
oh and @ what I said above, said changes I mentioned will be made public.
is it possible to request evidence on why aia banned you
I'd argue it depends, I'd rather that be a discussion between officer, uc, and/or AIA UO+. Not every offender requires their evidence to be sent to them.
@mortal moat are you just able to lock this now everythings been said
are your dms open
I'm fine with leaving it open if you'd like to respond. I'm open to having a discussion with you.
I mean as this post has been open, I'm fairly sure that everyone has said whats said but my last response will be this,
Will their be the change we want?
yes, always.
Not in the way you or some of the others who shared, or exaggerated / amplified your beliefs want it done, no. Not necessary. But @ what I said in my paragraph (which I'm sure you read), I will look into some of the points mentioned here that aren't already undergoing changes, and release a shout when these changes are implemented. Likely shouldn't be expected for another month or two, considering how new AIA's change was and my repositioning in AIA as the AO.
Yes as long as some points we said get some sort of recognition and change we are happy
yeah, @ what I said in my message I think I addressed that pretty clearly. Hopefully lol
k gtg I'll leave it open for a little bit longer.
Yea I saw, I did see some things which were a bit alarming that was said in this conversation
I'll just dm it
bro wrote an entire essay
ok 👍
i love how in this argument 90% of the up votes are people against aia and 90% of the downvotes are aia or officers\
depends but as walac/corpsii said its happened in the past
the upvotes got cleared there was many more
the people against the corrupt
tuff out here
yeah i know
it was 18 2 originally
Why did the upvotes got revoked
they didnt
ok that just means more people disliked it
stop on yapping like nothin happened
what
what makes you think a mod removed them
it happened out of no where
went from 18 to 5
instantly
bahaha shut up bro
we still have 18
thats crazy
it went back up to 18
but they tried to reduce it
fr
that image was taken at 2:47 PM
look at it again
Sorry sir, can I get invited back to sthd server 👉👈
It got removed to zero ages ago
Check logs or something
dont ask me
idk if you read my message or not but check it out.
and for the mistrust of AIA, imo that's a you problem. There are very few cases that proves you can't trust AIAs actions. You can dislike AIA all you want, but that doesn't mean suddenly all their actions need to be questioned or not believed.
I feel like the fact that there are cases shows that
on gawd
nobody’s perfect
there are cases with literally any possibility, just because theres one bad incident here and there doesn't taint all the good.
My bad, I was going off the last few comments.
So your telling me the person that made this suggestion trusts aia
Why are you only targeting 6 memebers
First you ban a one for entering a wasteland spawn and know your saying we don’t trust aia because their only proof they can tell us is “it’s classified”
crazy
We join an argument and you add that to the list of reason not to make 6 a trusted family
.
He’s only targeting us when you know damn well there more people then just 3 six
That's because there was three 6 members in chat during then. He was making a point.
He is not targeting six, he was saying how 6' isn't everyone.
He even apologized for the misunderstanding.
He’s always using 6 to try and put in a bad spotlight and this typa bullshjt is just pissing me off
Which he never had to do, but still did.
The only one using 6 to try and put it in a bad spotlight is yourself right now.
Damn
You got me there
You good officer
Sorry for all the shit I talked about you behind you back
why do aegis hate 6
if you got 6 in ur name ur automatically hated
6 generally just has a not-so-good reputation because quite a few of their members break rules
not everyone
but some
they are toxic
¨they¨
Well, maybe some people, and I don't know why. Still, this is kinda weird.
toxic ahh family
Nah yall just love false banning us
Naw ur a cool warran officer
Don't believe the 6 lies!!
zniy will not be happy to see this
I blame some toxic members , but majority of 6 are nice guys
Looks like everyone's said their piece
Spending 1000 dollars on a roblox game is insane
my bad
Makes sense never liked Intelligence divs most of them are begs half the time in RP groups not all but majority
Not giving evidence is crazy
Banning someone for having an alt is insane sounds like a fun time
mystery men that may or may not ruin ur career in dod and ur money
yes officer this one right here 😰
hes O whatchu expect
alright probably both
sc has highest authority
d m!!1!1
Only to those that ask for it on a case-by-case basis.
word
this
Basically its not relevant to you guys
The whole point to why aia is classified so much
Is because there is no point in knowing it
Half of the info would probably mean nothing to non aia
There’s information that’s not meant to be known or seen by the general public, as well as information that would otherwise damage the reputation of AEGIS or individuals
Yeah
Evidence is based on a need to know basis
what proud said
Chairman made it this way
He aint gonna change it
If everything was unclassified
There will be a lot of controversy regarding people
And that
Its better to keep some things private
Exactly
The most common for classification is to prevent further cases from people finding out about it
Anything aia wants to declassify is up to AIA leadership and HICOM
so good luck
It’s just a case of curiosity and misinformation. We could ban someone and they can just spread misinformation making people automatically come to the conclusion that we are somehow corrupt
This has happened more than people think, and it will never stop
Yeah
Just ignore it
People aren’t gonna stop
So u just gotta let it go by
Until they forget about it

I mean they always forget about it with time
So just ignore them
Ez
They are secretive for a reason
i direct people who try to appeal to me to the correct people
i only ignore stupid questions that arent relevant in any way
if someone has a legitimate concern about their ban i will tell them what to do
It reminds me of how people used to hate films
Some where chill tho
cuz you are
its proven
- ur literally being hypocritical
automatically think every aia member is bad
stupid mfs
everyone has bias
buzarec is not bad
leaders should not have bias
leaders should reduce their bias
that’s like telling soldiers to not ever make mistakes
you
that’s impossible
im not a leader tho
if u werent a member of 6 u wouldnt be complaining rn
it's impossible for anyone to not have a bias lol
tust me i would
u wouldnt
ive always complained
you should avoid having a bias in ur positon
avoid, yes
i joined 6 like 2 weeks ago
but it's impossible for people to not factor at least some bias in your decision
i aint really notice the hate towards em till now
impossible
cuz its a bad family
because u r now a member of 6
tries way too hard to get members
impossible not really yall just need to mature
i got invited to 6' at least 10 times
denied 10 times because
data on🔝
i think we're pretty mature even if we don't like a set group of people
i maintain no dislikes towards any groups of people
are you?
gets in the way of my job
didnt bro like start rking during a combat dept event?
all are individual
not impossible
you were dead before joining 6 💀
ive been inactive in this group till i came back and they invited me
so yes
i cant comment much on 6' but even if i disliked how their members act
i wouldnt hold it against them as some kind of prejudice
now you’re on 24/7
W mans
that is cap i played yesterday this whole week
that makes no sense
people have different personalities which simply have to be understood
i'm observant and try to keep my words to myself unless i think it's beneficial to the conversation
AIA do not hate specific groups of people for being that group of people
i at least havent noticed such, and certainly havent held such grudges myself
what about to the regis group?
and as for the actual TOPIC of this post
i think our transparency rules are fine
but if change happens
then change happens
i am indifferent and will do as protocol instructs
theyre not all bad people necessarily
some were misled and hadnt heard of AEGIS before
i wouldnt hold that against them
@loud thicket its not that hard see pal
cant let ur emotion control u
that doesnt prove much
he is still
will be still partly biased
even if he says he isnt everyone is to some degree
bro ur in 6 and now ur complaining abt this
some dall yall will learn
because i was inactive for a year
i did not know 6 existed till i joined
if u werent inactive u would care
yes
wouldnt*
there is no point in arguing, everyone is biased its not pyhsically to be unbiased
if there wasnt bias
there wouldnt be more then one uo
uc
officer
dc
its funny how aegis find everything is arguing
i find this as a nice peaceful conversation
i love @cobalt gulch more then anyone and if he wants i will host a tryout for him 😻
bros defending himself to prove that he isnt biased
no
he is for MDF
yes
no
nope
yes
guys please do not chat spam in uh suggestions please and thank you
- DPM if GAMEBIGHT and best dod player
:ban 
nope
i am biased
but i could care less because im not in a leading position
as i said earlier on the topic of the post
- AIA keeps its evidence classified for source protection, we lose all effectiveness if its all revealed to the public
- ToML+ can review it already
- I am personally opposed to the idea of changing our transparency rules, but I would not resist if they were changed. Like I said, I'm here to do my job, not interpret the rules to my liking.
so anyone could care less
i mean the only way its changing is if TOML+ decide
but if i were in a leading position i would take that bias away simple
doesnt seem like walac will ever do it
i also saw @wise ledge making some hefty claims about our UOC and agency as a whole
i understand you may be frustrated with us and our UOC
however, i havent seen our UOC or any AIA trying to actively silence anyone for speaking their mind about AIA
which is understandable
walac to busy hacking ppl accounbts

walac cracking alt accounts to get them banned
thats it
@cobalt gulch come my dear i will host a tryout for you 😻
im obliterating you
not if i ban you first
ill ban u before
u can't ban an admin
unbid has same mod as me thus he can't ban me
ill get chairman himself to ban you
not if i bribe him first
i have a hypermansion
yeah well
my dad owns roblox
my dad owns nasa
my dad owns the planet
my dad owns the universe
my dad owns the multiverse
my dad owns your dad
stop talking here please
lmfao waited for someone to tell that
my ass
🤓
sorry guys go on
I like to be hands on with things even as a UOC, as for the hacking part I was merely joking but there was an incident at the beginning of the year where known exploiters impersonated SIBYL and agents in order to gain access to multiple accounts and attempt to ruin our reputation.
ok moderator i will listen to you
come #aegis @versed fog
i also saw a claim about us banning people for simply owning alts
that was addressed, but to reiterate
we don't ban people for having alts, we ban people for using alts on DOD
i got a message from that thing
there was even fake chairman
Yeah it was an embed with something about suspicious activity.
i had no idea how the thing worked normally so i thought it was real for a second
but
i just blocked
That's good.

we can always show up to your front door
pls no

irl pksf to protect ur house
fr
i think something people forget about AIA is we are trying to ensure that the rules aren't broken
i'm much more glad when there aren't any incidents ongoing
dude shut the fuck up 🤣 you're a massive instigator
If you're going to make a comment, make some sense.
Don't spread malicious lies.
i didnt see this before
CORPSII IN THE HOUSE 🗣️ 🗣️ 🗣️
say less
but didnt i just prove that not all of us have a bias?
i dont think any family is bad as a baseline
pipe down ur the father of the corrupt
the individual is more important
woah woah
LOL
ur the only one that has proved to me you dont have a bias and i respect u for that
i think the least possible toml there could be is corpsii lol
that he is corrupt
the rest cant be bothered, but i can tell you that all AIA i'm aware of don't have anything against 6'
if some did, they would be the very small minority
You'll be striked if you continue to break rule 1 & 4. Stop acting like an asshole just so you can say some bs, untruthful accusations. If you want to have a discussion here, do so without spreading lies.
i think that everything that can be said here has been said and now people are just bickering and arguing in circles
oh loow here we go silence me with threats
the aia hater mindset
It's easy to play the victim.
i think those strikes are justified
bro
i hate aia forcing us to not have alts
im sure they are
why are the approve reactions removed
god bless america
why are they approve
to be fair
you didnt have a point that time
that was an ad hominem attack that really had nothing to do with the discussion
its not like it matters tbh, its up to aia leadership and TOML
the
just like the pksf one
i dont insult people when discussing a subject
im not speaking about aia on that
yeah but still public opinion
toml arent gonna change it so not much point in voting on it
he was the one that pinged me telling me "shut the fuck up"
uhh idk, I'd like to think that it's a bug but either way the voices have been heard, regardless of the votes.
wow
you clearly didn't read the past 12h.
💀
nah
You're not talking back, you're spreading malicious lies.
Starting drama.
he was telling you to not spread misinformation
show us evidence then
people even admit they are biased
But.. you just affirmed I'm not?
Therefore we're not all biased?
the irony of this is hilarious
scroll up look at officers admiting
Which would make that statement false.
okay but those are officers, who also have no idea how AIA works internally
I've not shown any bias in my comments here, as far as I'm aware.
skull
i hate aia #defundAIA #freeMyBoyDavidApple
im not talking about yall aia freaks
W aia
im talking about aegis in general
this is lowkey an aia thread
well everyone has moved on from that topic but yall
Every human being has some form of bias in them whether it's intentional or not. The great thing about AEGIS moderation is that it bases itself on facts, and clear outlines. It removes the "bias" aspect largely because of this. But there is no "corruption" lol.
i am biased and corrupt and my own feelings are the only factor in my ban decisions @wise ledge
you got me
no @kindred spade has proved yall just need to mature and not let emotion control you pal
When discussing a subject, it's important to focus on defeating the point another person is making, not defeating the person making the point.
Corpsii is not letting their emotions control them.
That's almost like what happens 24/7 here.
thats cap ur a good man dont let them make u bad buzarec
I'd argue Corpsii is more mature than me.
can confirm this is true
wait, we can't just ban people we don't like? 😭 😭
as an sc for almost 1 year
no
drama????
ur most mature person here
🍿
fr
Share
That's not really true. I've just chosen my words carefully like a politician.
AIA AO Corpsii and other AIA leadership here are perfectly mature and reasonable.
thats cap dont defend them
They wouldn't be in those positions otherwise.
I have confidence in their abilities. I've seen them first hand, no?
@wise ledge thoughts on mo6ve's ban
Everyone makes mistakes either way.
friends hire friends and thats how it starts
I do too.
Your deluding your perspective by actually believing the nonsense you're trying to spill. It's almost like you're trying to say the first negative thing that comes to mind, and instantly believing it without any retort.
i dont even know what its for and could care less
fair
we just banned him because we don't like him fr fr 🗣️
trueeee
i banned him because he said my feet pics are mid
They are
:O
i believe it cuz i see it happening right now
cant open that
you've done it now
Once again, it's important to consider what's being defeated in a debate.
We're not defeating the person. We're defeating the point they make. The distinction is important.
Nothing you're saying is happening right now.
you banned kano for spawn killing which is a warnable offense also the spawn just came out there was no rules on it
i love rule 1

that is bias
what is the point of this convo anymore im not really seeing it
to show bias
Didn't you just call it a spawn?
yes it is a spawn
Spawn killing has always been a bannable offense, and he blantantly bypassed the few spawn protection the spawns have and spawn killed.
This is not bias, this is a clear fact.
It is a spawn, after all.
they has not spawn protection dylan later put the barrior thing
Spawn killing has never been allowed.
Kano found a loophole around the spawnkill protection, and was able to spawn kill because of it.
He was banned because spawn killing is a bannable offense, and always has been.
I don't think those who banned ka6noo have bias against him. But I don't really know ka6noo, so I can't speak on that.
spawn killing is warnable
no
no
or atleast most people get warned for it
spawn camping is
no
no
spawn killing isnt
or kick warned
spawn camping and spawn killing are two different things.
well ive been warned for it man
this ^^^
spawn camping is warnable, spawn killing is bannable
look at my warns prettu sure there is spawn killing in there somewhere
Spawn killing isn't supposed to be possible with the spawn protection system in place. However, in the clip you can clearly see kano directly trying to- and succeeding in- making that spawn protection null & void.
the spawn protection is null when the person engages in combat pal
He moved 2 feet in the clip, was obliberated.
because mercs aint have no spawn protection at the time
Kano just traced him until he left his spawn.
the spawn just came out
This is quite literally making your argument worse.
from what ive seen spawn killing is kickwarn OR warn and serverban? but what kano did was mass spawn kill, so really i think an ecoban was justified
So he broke a rule, but because the spawn didn't have adequite planning he shouldn't be held to a standard of common sense & the general guidelines?
That's a weak ass argument.
Spawn killing has always been against the rules. Spawn camping has always been against the rules.
Both offenses were committed.
You're not a moron,
nah its insta ban since there is a spawn protection system and if they bypass it by any means then they are abusing the system
You didn't need a sign telling you not to spawn kill or spawn camp.
AMCS Spawn is a spawn
Spawn killing is prohibited
??
i see
I'd hope that you don't think so low of yourself that you think you actually need to see a sign telling you not to spawn kill or camp a spawn.
ive never seen a person get banned for spawn killing
if they disable the spawn protection via shooting someone then you can kill
mane what are you yappin about
Maybe because since you've started, spawn killing shouldn't have been possible. The system made to prevent it has been here for a while.
Yet kano was able to get around it.
Are you iliterate? What confused you so I can help you understand?
english not my first language so maybe
idk
Not mine either. But I do my best. :D
that's understandable.
What is confusing you where you don't understand what I said?
i got banned for spawn killing in 2020 😭
Just because spawn protection wasn't implemented at the time but exists for all the other spawns doesn't mean it's allowed, that's just making an excuse to do it.
L
It was implemented, still bypassed.
You can see it in the clip. The only difference after the update is they had no barrier
the system is set to when the person with spawn protection is enged in combat their spawn protection is reomved
I got banned for spawning in 1956
Even worse then. 💀
Yet as you can see in the clip, Kano was mag-dumping into the guy, giving him no chance to even step foot out of his spawn.
As soon as the guy moved, he was killed. Did not have time to fight back.
he aint kill him tho
what would happen if an officer or sc accidenally ecobans themselves
He did, though.

A very interesting discussion
if he is in his spawn with spawn protection and the merc does not shoot at him then he cant be killed
interesting.
@icy arch be our lab rat please
oops sorry sir i accidentally ecobanned myself pls pls pls appeal
poor mar
The merc moved a few feet which disabled the spawn protection, allowing kano to- while still mag dumping into the merc- kill him instantly.
dont say that to him
ok chat why are we talking about this guys ban in this thread 💀
bit off topic ive just realised
If you are prohibiting movement out of a spawn by effectively killing them as they move and lose spawn protection, that's spawn killing.
everything is off topic
What is even happening now
mr 6 member isn't happy
yo what do you think about aegis complaining we spawn killing them
i remember the days when spawn camping wasnt enforced
idk
old man
there where raiders killingg every random wastelander once they step 1 inch out of spawn for "kd"
You guys don't spawn kill AEGIS for the most part. Wastelanders definititely used to spawn camp though.
topic went AIA > Bias > AIA > Bias > Corpsii. V. Ba6ne discussion > Bias accusation (ka6noo case)
@mortal moat can we lock this thread its clearly going nowhere
Honestly just close the thread now
dardog threated to warn me for spawn killing yesterday if i did not stop killing them
Everyone made their point
its a nice place for conversation
why close i
tt
He would've been wrong so long as you weren't shooting in the "aegis spawn" hallway, which I'm sure was highlighted in the og shout not so long ago.
just leave
Use #🌐global or something
I am happy to discuss non-classified matters in DMs if anyone has questions for me that I may or may not able to answer
you can exit out the thread you know
If you were shooting in the aegis spawn hallway, it would've been SK.
The point of this thread is for the AIA issues brought up, not “bias” for a reasonable ban
pls
^ I agree, it is getting offtopic.
what did ka6nooo do
you're allowed to do that if you give them a few seconds to run afaik
sorry i didnt wanna read 100000 messages of this thread
is that big hallway that leads to roof count as aegis spawn then?
No, the spawn hallway. Not the big corridor
Anyone know the record for most messages in a feedback thread?
idk
ok
not the main topic, it's offtopic atm.
No.
And if that's all you were doing, it'd just be a warning for spawn camping so long as you were given a verbal warning to stop first.
Which it sounds like you were given an adequite verbal warning.
pls let me be last to speak
Thankfully 🙏🏻
Anyways, yes, this is offtopic. Buz I believe even aced said he wouldn't mind it being closed, so feel free.
fr
He heard my points, I heard his, we came to a conclusion.
oi
No :)
a
no
yes
.
bye bye
maybe
bye


