#Remove the "Your ban was detected as Appealable" message in jell
100 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
-- Assuming we have references to the two TextBoxes
local banReasonTextBox = script.Parent:WaitForChild("BanReasonTextBox")
local appealStatusTextBox = script.Parent:WaitForChild("AppealStatusTextBox")
-- Connect the `TextChanged` event of the banReasonTextBox
banReasonTextBox.TextChanged:Connect(function()
local banReason = banReasonTextBox.Text:lower() -- Convert the text to lowercase for case-insensitive matching
if banReason:match("unappealable") or banReason:match("%[U%]") then
appealStatusTextBox.Text = "Unappealable"
else
appealStatusTextBox.Text = "Appealable"
end
end)
```some super super simple code to make it possible, but im sure coded or Chairman would be able to make better code or whatever 

i agree with that too
I agree with this
why not just add a new argument to the ban command to make it appealable or not
How about just agree 
more hassle for officers tho
True
Congrats on sc
tbh its like the same amount of work, cause ur either typing [A]/[U] or selecting the same options in new input 
but honestly, either would work
as long as there is some standard way
so the message on Jell can be correct
Weren’t you a warrant officer?
Maybeee
Well then double congratulations
Thank you
bro used chatgpt
Wtf is wait for child
its an extremely useful too, and i use it all the time to speed up my workflow as a programmer
nothing wrong with it
its waiting to get the child element matching the input name
pretty much what is happening is with script.Parent is grabbing the element the script is attached to (aka a child of) then :WaitForChild waits to grab the child element of the script's parent that matches the input name
hopefully that helps!
Thanks
Voodoo 1, Viper's on station. Your journey ends here, Pilot. The skies belong to me. Nowhere to run, nowhere to hide.
Convert ecoban command to / and make it require a specification on if its appealable or not
Simple solution that eliminates confusion for all future bans
^^
already in the script
its already /
mb I assumed it didn't change since I'd last used it
then why dont it work 💀
i agree
at least make the function actually work, so it displays the correct information
agreed
it just currently confuses banned users
making it actually function would make it incredibly useful would it not
removing it is the lazy and harmful route
and im saying your suggestion to remove it instead of making it function is counterproductive
if they're gonna put the effort in to remove it, it might as well be fixed
whats the big deal anyway 99% of aegis bans arent even appealable
simply just say it anyway cuz they will come to ur dms asking to appeal anyway
a Jokel said it so its factual
yea simply supply evidence and say its unappealable then block or ignore them
yea it is
(most bans are actually appealable tf y'all on about)
you give the reason why they are banned and the evidence and then tell them if its appealable or not
regardless its still a nice feature to have
both
It detects keywords
in oretary if its says Exploiting then its unappealable automatic
and it does work
its just aegis bans are a whole paragraph
not wrong
it would be good if its selected reasons
same with oretary thats a cool idea
most likely would come to oretary as well since both use the same bot
ofc not since in the image supplied its a whole different sentence
also tf does [U] mean
mfw lil bro is banned for 'Knowing, repeated, and malicious usage of alts, ban evading, mass leaking, mass exploiting.'
no
i promise you these aegis mfs get innovative
need to invent new ban reasons
what did walac do
the thread image
simply say nothing
and call saul
AIA suspect you of having guidelines? Don’t worry just stay silent and call SAUL!!!
but yeah for ban punctuality and all that trash selected reasons wouldn't be a good solution
fr like i need to add the keep your self safe part at the end
is this real chat?
FR
if the person says "im sowy" just unban them (they are sorry for their actions)
hmmm
how can we program that Script detects that player's ban is unappealable or appealable
dont need to, they already have one
ur ban message gets displayed already
so if u just take content from the message, then boom
We don't need to that solution wont work and is impractical
Why are y'all approving removing the feature but then saying it should be fixed?
we never approved of removing the feature, unless it wont be fixed?? we just want it fixed... but if it isn't going to be fixed remove it as it is misleading
You literally approved a suggestion which says in its title it wants it removed
well with a tad more reading you can see that we either want it replaced with something work, a different message, or removed
but at least if it is removed, then it will not mislead people
but i didn't title the thread, yet it has lead to discussion about fixing the problem and removal is just one suggested fix
never