#Online Dating Within AEGIS
2445 messages ¡ Page 3 of 3 (latest)
What would you consider out of hand
so whats already in place i assume
Basically what we have now but make it more strict
In sensitive cases I'm pretty sure people affected would much rather approach someone they trust, privately, as opposed to every single officer+ being able to see their case
what do we have now
But thing is as it happened before in other circumstances the person who was reported of an incident didnt handle with it and the person who was reporting it left due to lack of trust within AEGIS regcom+
And nothing much was done except for the removal of the offender
And the removal of power to the one who didnt handle the report
Whereas if they could report it to somewhere all officers+ can see then it gets dealt with
Anyways u can still make it so u can also do it privately
That incident had nothing to do with regcom or the overwatch core whatsoever. It was entirety within IC/HICOM
There was also nothing anyone below HiCOM could've done about it
Still though if u added a way to allow it to be reported to multiple officers then it would provide a more trust in the system
Instances like those absolutely shouldn't be handled by regcom+ as a whole, given their sensitivity. Also edating was hardly the biggest issue there lol
Make it overwatch+ then
As long as multiple people deal eith it
Then its more trustworthy
I'm down to hear concerns and do whatever i can to address them but in some cases there really isn't much we can do. That incident for instance, a UC would'nt have been able to do much, besides possibly investigate, then rely on IC/HiCOM to enforce anything
At which point those entities would've had to conduct their own investigation regardless
Not to mention the risk of private matters spilling out where it shouldn't when more and more people are involved
Well why let 1 member deal with such a serious situation
Why not make it multiple
It would be more trustworthy right?
IC is a tribunal
HiCOM is what, 9 people?
It was never one single person that was responsible
Well you could argue IC basically crumbles whenever coded isn't here but that's a separate issue
It was always 1 person though that gets informed
They are relied on
To start the consern
If they arent there then they could prevent further insight
And cause distrust
Anyways i agree with your point on limiting friendships with banning of e dating
Most of the time, multiple hicom are informed if we're dealing with a particular situation.
It should just be monitored more closely
Yes but its relied on that person to start the consern why not make a place where itâs automatically addressed?
Then its dealt with more effectively
Id be repeating the multiple points already made against this.
The marshal incident was a fault. IC have publicly stated as much. But that doesn't mean sensitive issues should be opened to a range as wide as regcom+, for quite a lot of reasons, one is quite simply there's not a whole lot they can do
Make it overwatch+ then
They can investigate
Toml can then act apon it
Once its done
Toml and IC would have to conduct their own investigation regardless
These are sensitive issues with heavy punishments
All you're achieving is unnecessarily involving more individuals than what's required, and damaging the privacy of people affected
More often than not it's usually a request from the parties affected that incidents be kept as secretive as possible
Ig
But when its not dealt with properly
Its unfair
To the person repoting
I would rather have a situation dealt with and be public
Then for it to be too late
And barely dealt with at all
You're not really thinking about the gravity of the situation. In a situation like this one would absolutely not want such an investigation to be public
I see what you're trying to get at but it's absolutely not the way to go
Maybe my expectations for ranks that deal with it were too low
But if toml deal with it anyways
Make a way where they can deal with it easier
Like where toml can see conserns
Anyways its 6am
And i havent slept
Dont judge
It was a one off failure, I'm sure toml and IC will be more than aware of past shortcomings and work to improve things internally
Although, a way to report things directly to the entirety of HiCOM doesn't sound too bad..
The issue is if we made it something like a ticket it'd just be misused by initiates wanting points
Thing is, most the time if something needs to be dealt with by HiCOM the person that was initially contacted would just involve everyone else
We're talking about a one off failure where that didn't happen, but most of the time that isn't the case
Thing is though what if someone reports it to a lets say regcom member
Cuz they didnt know
It would be harder to deal with and keep private
Because the officer wouldnât know what to really do
Except alert more
Well the regcom member is expected to escalate to HiCOM when they don't know what to do
What if they didnt and just told other officers
That would be less than ideal
It'd bounce around and get to HiCOM eventually but it's not rlly what I'd prefer happening
True but what are you trying to say here lol
Anyways it was a fun discussion lightning but i gotta sleep
I mean half the drama in this community is just⌠weird for a roblox game in all honesty
Even if we had, let's say, HiCOM tickets. If someone DM'd an officer it's likely the same issue
Yeah it's an unfortunate reality but it really isn't just aegis
Lets e date in a military roblox game
Yah I know
You see it across such communities and it's disappointing and unwarranted but it does happen
Mhm
I love dating in block game
Say the same thing 10 more times please
Why
Cause you already seem to like doing it
No
Sceptism does tho
@gilded basin he is always looking for someone
Since he cant get any real love

Lol
Not what I meant but ok
Poor scep
What did u mean then
Youâve said the same line over and over, something along the lines of being sarcastic about dating in a roblox game
We get it
Ok
Its not really something to care about tho
Its just a joke
Whatever
Anyways other people have said sarcastic jokes about it
So if ur gonna moan at me
Do it to them
Or just dont ignore it
Havenât said the same joke ten times đ
2 times bro it aint that deep
đ¤
Shut up scep
@gilded basin Love me
this thread is too serious for me
@hot wadi panda can we edate
yes
letsgo
Grammar
"I don't even know you are" Fixed: I don't even know who you are
Listen lady
Propher grammar ia not necessary, don't think it's a big dealđ
neider does me
Proof
Fr
@frozen star đ¤¨
Shush scep u cant say anything
Ur the biggest e dater on roblox
I agree with. This suggestion is trying to fix corruption inside aegis but itâs nearly impossible to fix it
đđ
Saying we need to "fix the corruption inside aegis" is also not very truthful to the underlying issue. Remarkably very few instances on the higher-level are done out of corruption.
Drama
Agreed.
And to be fair 'bias' can never be 'fixed' because sub-conciously for certain reasons one can be biased towards an individual they have seen more of rather than someone who you barely see but did the same.
Sub-concious bias is of course inevitable.
But it is the blatant bias that we must prevent and that actually CAN be prevented.
i just upvoted bc someone told all mdf to upvote
im down voting
i dont think people need to make it apparent they are dating in a border game
its a personal type thing and obviously its ok but i dont want to hear your couple shit
@empty rivet did u downvote bc you want to date me
wouldn't the most successful version of implementation be not invasively invading relationships but rather forcing them to stay private and discouraging them (even though edaters probably wont care) and in the event that the specified groups listed in the suggestion decide to bring this public then demote the parties involved?
taking a stance as a group against edating on your platform but not actively witch hunting and only enforcing it when lines are crossed seems the most logical, right?
I donât think heâs suggesting that we have an e-dating gestapo. However, blatant fraternization has been an issue here for a long time
Yea I know but others have brought up a valid concern of privacy and many of these cases are not easy to catch immediately until one party is unsatisfied
If they keep it private, that should solve the nepotism issue.
I think officers should understand the power dynamic and why fraternization would be prohibited.
Keeping things private doesn't solve nepotism, in fact it would likely make it worse & harder to detect.
Hicom are finishing the final discussions regarding this issue and will be releasing a statement & any changes to come by this conference.
After carefully reading of each argument, and a lot of the points each person has been making.
đŤ
If officers are going out of their way to hide illicit behavior from HICOM and IC, thatâs another problem that needs solvingâŚ
? Wdym
This whole issue was brought up due to public displays of affection between Officers and Enlisted members, if prohibiting fraternization causes them to instead privatize their behavior, that brings the officerâs loyalty into question.
While I donât think AIA, HICOM, and IC should be invading the privacy of others, it should be understood by all Officer+ that the power dynamic still remains regardless of public display.
oh I read your message wrong
Is it really our place to interfere with what happens outside the group? If everything is kept separate from the group there is no right for the group's administration to pry
Imo
No, itâs not. The issue is fraternization within AEGISâs ranks.
We'll wait for the HICOM verdict. I doubt an outright blanket ban will be enforced
Imo an easier fix to this is just that if the person is Officer+ they should not be allowed to vote for their SO, it keeps everything fair,
Aka in AOA invites, officer promotions, etc
People wont be able to blame nepotism or anything of that sort on the officer and their SO, yes them not being able to vote might suck but it keeps everything as fair as possible since everyone finds this a big issue.
should just let people be happy
if it starts affecting AEGIS, that's where "letting people be happy" starts to become a problem.
Can't have 100% of both worlds.
You're right, there is no 100% of both worlds but there definitely is able to be and should be a common ground in this "situation". Those who have an existing relationship with one another and they just happen to be Officer+ or in the AOA spending time and putting in effort to work up the ranks, shouldn't be investigated or put on hold or looked down upon because they are in an intimate relationship with one another. And most importantly they shouldn't have their personal lives looked into because a situation or two happens every 6 or so months involving two people in an intimate relationship. I don't see those who are good friends with each other being persecuted because of their friendship. But the truth is that the bias and nepotism comes from those friendships. Not the intimate relationships. There's a few cases where the two individuals are in a intimate relationship are being bias to help each other out and cheat the system but that happens every once in 5-6 months at most. I don't think anyone can't sit here and try to justify that the leading cause of bias is coming from people in romantic relationships rather than the ones in good friendships. The ratio between the two is just so disproportionate.
I'm not saying that those who are in intimate relationships shouldn't be re-assured, or measures brought against them to not bring their personal life into the AOA. Instead I'm saying that they shouldn't be stripped of their privacy and get fucked over when they have put all this time and effort into the group.
how much time did you spend typing that
This is basically my opinion. If it doesn't effect stuff negatively I generally don't have a issue with people doing it. Its their lives afterall but once it causes negativity like prejudices and effecting other peoples experiences then that is when it becomes a issue.
I think we've found a sound solution that addresses both sides concerns. Hopefully by this conference, tensions will be eased and we can continue on normally with the change đ
cool
Every week on Saturday at 3:00PM EST.
For the last two Saturdays of every month, it's hosted at 10:00AM EST for our Aussy and Asian region.
^
lol
what I donât get is
What people thing keeping it private will solve
It certainly wonât prevent any bias and furthermore by having more public relationships the individual can be put under more scrutiny when deciding things like promotions, etc
(Not that I am advocating that hicomm must be aware of every relationship either, that is just as bad)
I've stopped involving myself at this point
I just fly VTOLs and chill
Are officer+ able to excuse themselves from votes, etc?
no but it shouldnt be that hard to allow it / make it a rule
If there is a concern for bias they should be given the option to either excuse themselves, or vote knowing if it later turns out they acted unfairly or had a bias there will be repercussions
force someone to be neutral regarding any decisions made about someone they are in a relationship with
Exactly
It could even be voluntary if they donât believe they can make a fair decision
by DEFAULT and IMMUTABLY, they have to be forced to abstain regarding any voting or decisions made if they are in a relationship
exceptions would be mayyyyyyybe ToML, and probably IC+ since we NEED these people to respond and they cant exactly be neutral because it would lead to no decision being made
IC sure toml no
fair
IC+ then
since theres only 2 if we force one to abstain it would literally cut their workforce in half lmfao
if any form of anti-bias rules are in place id be the first to advocate it applies to toml as much as it does to everyone else because their decisions have more impact than most of officer+ put together
no - just make it compulsory
relationships MUST be declared to ToML+, you can declare them in private if you want but you have to
and then mandate neutrality
would only apply to Officer+ and Div OW+, ignore most of AFA - AS
okay Ive had my dose of children RPing as adults for one day imma go watch some anime adios
I mean it should be both
It should be compulsory at tomls discretion
But say itâs a friendship or something
n o
That toml does not need to be informed of
if you want to prevent this behaviour
The officer can abstain themselves
Yes
no optional
I know
I literally said this 2 days ago
Its the easiest fix
Yeah it was your suggestion that gave me the idea of optionally abstaining from a vote
I donât think anyone should be required to declare a relationship to toml
it should be required
if you dont require it
then theres zero point
Thatâs a massive privacy invasion
btw the hicom decision is shouted this conf
no it isnt
in case u guys havent heard
I know in some workplaces itâs required
But this is not a real job
This is an online community
Ugh
I have a better idea
If ur in a relationship that has a power dynamic, aka an EFA and a Veteran Officer
This information is disclosed to Regcom and itâll be noted down
this is all fax
N o
The VO should not be allowed to take part in any votes regarding EFA
Then HICOM
Just
HRâs that can note it down
And keep track
The veteran officer should be excluded from any votes that have anything to do with EFA
its an easy fix
eh okay
Ut keeps everything fair
anyway
No one can get blamed for nepotism
im done with this conversation
Myah same
Bias is still one component, can there really be consent in a relationship with a power dynamic?
I just realized I could've made everyone
this suggestion with one simple change:
(with rizz)
changing my vote rn
Bros on to something
honestly
W post
but one thing is jsut that if its outside of aegis it shouldnt matter
unless it affects their aegis work or sum shit
you got my â back
FR BRO
hit the gym
focus on urself
not some random online person
who u will prolly never meet
fr
you can't even know if its really a woman or a man on the other side đ
True bro
with modern voice changers you literally cant even know in vc anymore
YES THATS WHAT I'M SAYING
You can literally sound like anyone
true
Hold on lemme try sounding like a girl
So apparently this has been here and I didn't see it 
ikr
i saw the thing #đ˘đglobal-shout and i thought wth is this e-dating about
fr
The new rule will not exempt ToML or IC.
no
We aren't the relationship police.
lol
Also to address the recent conversation,
In the shout there is a clause mentioning if you can't trust yourself to not vote justly in matters involving your relationship (if you think your s/o deserves a promotion, you must be able to prove without a reasonable doubt they're qualified given the facts of their position. Have they met quota? Cooldown done? Exemplary performance otherwise?)
Then you probably shouldn't be an officer+. However we would like to think we're all respectable & responsible enough to conduct ourselves properly.
So while on one hand we encourage- for your own safety- to not vote / involve yourself with matters with your s/o involving AEGIS,
We also greatly appreciate and can value those who aren't clouded by their relationship and look at the facts
W
Not to toot my own horn but I know if I were in a relationship in AEGIS that I'd be capable of looking past that and enforcing our rules fairly, voting if needed, etc without the influence of said s/o.
yeah
being clouded by a relationship isnt healthy
if u cant vote without being biased from your relationship
then why vote?
GODGAMER707505reborn is typing...
whar
hello
some people donât even know they are being biased
yeah
thats the problem
if they dont know then clearly their relationship isnt healthy
Ladies.
Tbh the simple fact of "e-dating" seems really wrong, you'll probably never get to see the other person so why bother smh
Imagine you do, and your mother asks you how you met, then you both look at each other and dead seriously say: "We met on Roblox."
Imagine the faces of your relatives lol
Man, explaining that I have good friends that I've known for years from roblox is cringy as hell
You know the funny part is, only my sister knows what Roblox is, my parents half know it.
But they would never take you serious again.
Having to explain the whole game to friends and my current position is already pretty weird lmao

even when I met oce and lites last week my family who was travelling with me was like "uhh, what?"
You know the funny part, my Dad walked in on me playing DoD once and he asked me "Why are these guys protecting you, and why do you not have a uniform like the rest?"
So then I had to explain this entire thing to him which took me 15 minutes as he wanted to know details đ
"Why are you just sitting there doing nothing, how is that fun"
That's the next thing he asked.
Then he asked what jell was when an initiate tried to TK me for the 5th time. So I had to explain that too.
(Note this was all when I got UC for the first time)
u met them??
Corpsii doing the AIA meetup irl
He's on his way to yo coĂśrdinates cuh
don't let this guy cook
let him cook you yolker
shut the hell up
lol
hell yeah bro gotta see them ladies
||this is a joke, but yes we did meet up as friends||
Isn't that just regular dating then?
(I don't know much about dating smh)
imma hop on stage and start e dating the toml đ¤Š
đ
i want to online date đ
ew
is normal medals etc still gonna happen
ye
ok
I have a strong feeling the proposal will satisfy both the for & opposing major parties of the suggestion.
Why e-dating needs to be public like can't you just keep it personal and don't mention about it in general channels?
They know they'll get a-trained but they still do it in general
i wonder what happened to start this debate lmao
Locked post since it has been resolved. đ
@fluid badger could leave it open for another 24h or something?
wai
might be good if someone wants to debate the decision or whatnot
rather than clogging ontopic
doesn't make a big difference.
Fineeeeeeeeeee đ
I just read those paragraphs at the top.
I completely Agree with what he has stated and there should be change within AEGIS.
Hey @ashen hedge.
What does The Chairman think of these things?
bro probably doesent even know
He trusts HICOMs judgement when it comes to AEGIS's community.
Thats good.
@scenic lance thoughts regarding the decided solution?
at least he got something
Honestly I think this is a good solution to a complex problem.
we basically sort of run the group, we make changes and stuff to guidelines etc. Dylan can be considered like our overseer, he usually doesn't get involved too much or give his input on things and allows us to make the changes
that makes sense
It provides a reasonable solution while also discouraging online dating within the community in the first place, which is honestly one of the biggest things I wanted from this post.
when did u get aia (ik its off topic but i need to ask)
God damn.
Do you have any concerns with how we decided to do it? I know you and some others felt pretty strongly about your suggestion so I wanted to make sure I addressed it
how nice would you have to be to someone to classify it as e dating
Heres a concern when considering the ups or down. Do you think people might abuse this rules to give biases to people they don't like. Like report them for edating when they actually are not.
People bouta date me with consent
without*
Sir you are dating uh matxdata I saw it with my own eyes!!!!
Well I saw you with uhh... AEGIS OS yeah you were dating him!
OMG
I was found out. Ya know Ais gotta do what ais gotta do
Corpsii wants to keep it open for ~24 hours to let people discuss if needed
he said it here earlier
they can't report them for edating without proof
and what would be considered valid proof. Things can be forged and friendships could appear like edating. Thats just the one thought I had.
then that person that was reported only needs to explain
and the person that falsely reports him gets his ass booted
I assume both sides would have to be showing affection
can someone tell me what happened in the conference
#đ˘đglobal-shout message
we cant view the channel that the ruling was made in
or at least I cant
Its global shouts
I can see the conference details but the ruling part itself shows #no access
oh
Yes it really
only applies to AEGIS
but I'll post it here
thanks
no access đ
ty
lol
aaegis already pries into peoples life outside of the group
wht happened with scrutinized proves it
That's not the same at all.
Scrutinized is an exploiter, a troll, a schemer

