Clarify in subsidiary guidelines what counts as disrupting a training by raiding coolant. Many people interpret this rule in different ways, such as threatening ban players who raid coolant at this time, or banning players for playing with coolant (even if it doesn't effect the training!!) It should be clarified to something such as "setting off the 800 temperature warning or raising the temperature above 800 counts as disturbing the training" (forcing ard out of the training to protect coolant) @tawdry veldt
#Clarification on what classifies as causing a meltdown during training
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
np
"causing a meltdown" is literally what it means, causing the reactor to overheat and go into meltdown
Basically if a meltdown occurs then you will be disciplined
It’s as simple as that
Doesn’t matter about the alarm you set off
If meltdown happens then that’s it
if you need a more indepth description of this that's your problem.
How hard is it to just not cause a meltdown?
You want us to say 800 specifically so you can troll and balance the temp?
Just don't touch it?
so it being at 799 throughout the training is disrupting it even though there is no alarm that goes off nor any indication of any kind to disrupt the training nor any meltdown of any kind?
if a raider purposefully balances it then it is of no problem to aegis at the time of a training, no harm is done during said training
plus a raider balancing it means they are aware and respectful of this rule
purposefully not causing one
It's a troll.
still disrupting training
but tell me
how is it disrupting a training if there is no way of knowing its even being touched
aegis logic
Only ban if it goes to 800
All they'd have to do is try not to have us write every specific detail down..?
the rule state you get banned if you cause a meltdown, even says coded, yet you get banned even if you dont do that because its trolling?
loophole moment
not a loophole its two separate things???
So loophole
It’s easy. Just wait until the training ends to mess with coolant. Not that hard.
its already clarified, "Causing a reactor meltdown during a training/event is not allowed. It will be considered the same as disrupting training."
Just don't make it go boom when training
But that should only apply when it's at 800 or more shouldn't it?
I don't see how touching the coolant and keeping it below 800 is considered disrupting trainings or events since it isn't triggering anything and they might want to try and keep it has high as possible without going to 800 or more during trainings so they can cause a meltdown a few minutes after the training is over.
what if the coolants where off before training, and training start but u just defended the coolants and didnt turn it back on
is that meltdown during training
apparently
there's not even a mention of what happens if you turn them off and leave before a training
like how could you ban someone when they would have zero idea that a training was being hosted
If something like that happened then just hit up your lawyer division and you'll be fine
.
completely random and also you can
that was a wrong ban
you made a whole suggestion for a false ban that a TO made
but its still respectable
mainly because of that, yes, however it has still been argued against what it counts as by officers in the past
not naming names but people being threatened to get banned for just being in coolant during a training
How about when there’s training mode activated the coolant stays at whatever temp it’s at but it can’t be turned on or off by clicking the little pad thing until training is over
yeah could be turned on in SC room