#pc-build-help-and-tech-talk
1 messages · Page 9 of 1
and multiple layers of a level is just poopoo
yep
easily cuts my fps in half
same as biolab environment but perhaps even worse
bc biolab just doesn’t run but at least it doesn’t flood my memory
whereas dimensions just seem to be invisible textures loaded in on top of eachother until that dimension is turned on
Oh Ok. I'm pretty new so I've only done all the A and B levels in R1 and R2
"16GB VRAM" what the fuck
want me to show you?
the game DEVOURS vram if there’s dimensions
Oh no I trust you... It's just, damn
Like no frustum culling ?
devs dun goofed up
yep sure is
this is extremely difficult if you are good with used parts
but I guess it boils down to "best for the budget I have"
there isn't really a "the best value PC" except that there is, but why target that
Dad spilt basically a full glass of water directly into the top vent of his pc while it was on, place your bets whether it still works after its dry on a week
that depends on what you want the performance to have as features. If you're only looking to do 1080p at a rock solid 60fps, a surprisingly low budget can get you there. When you start pushing higher resolutions and more effects, that's where things start to cost more and get harder to maintain the "fps per dollar spent" equation in the positive.
is 60 FPS good for GTFO or is it in the eh works but id get smth better catogory
i mean, the game is mostly "slowly creep around and stare into the fog"
What is considered overpriced or too expensive for a PC case?
over 180 usd, or a case several sizes larger than what the motherboard requires.
just confirm that your monitor can actually run over 60 fps (which unless its a cheap 4k monitor, most monitors run at at least 75 fps nowadays).
most of the later levels involve decent gunplay, but i'd say you dont really need more than 100 fps.
100-150$ is a good price for anything high end ish
Usually well made, and doesn't look cheap either
My p600s was like 160 and honestly, best case ive had so far.
And how come there aren't many 4 stick DDR5 kits?
Because very few people need 64 gb ram, also its more stress on the mc, so trying to sell based on an xmp or expo or whatever does not work well
Ie 2 kits at xmp is no longer stable
Is 4 8GB sticks still OK to do?
big case enjoyers club
but yea for aio/normal heatsink i would not drop over 150 for a case
Of ddr5? Sounds silly.
Why?
because 2 x16 sticks are cheaper than 4x8, with probable better performance going to the 16gb sticks.
I like 4 sticks instead of 2.
Interesting
you can get “filler” sticks
fake ram sticks
to fill up your empty slots
probably cheaper and definitely better for performance
btw ddr5 is dog
xD
so unstable real big headache to get to work right good luck xmping it you could get lucky lol
and 4 stick ddr5 very annoying too
idk
Just get a two stick kit with good enough speed and you're fine
They seem finicky as fuck about speed for one of the two manufacturers but that's about it
the issue with that is generally it's achieved through some sort of overclock
so you get ghosting and frame smearing
but it isn't that horrible unless you managed to get a really bad monitor
Honestly, when i can get a 4k 144hz 27 in qd oled is when im going to fucking upgrade
EXPO seems to work fine for me
that probably exists
I have the ultrawide variant of that exact spec
well
not exact
4k is usually 32 inch huh
there was an implied displayport 2.1
is there a 27in 4k 144hz+ qd oled?
not that i know of
I see them with 32 inch tho
I swear by ultrawide
hate uw
nvm i’m capping
it was qled
and there’s miniled
but no oled
damn
they start at like 42 inch
which is too big for me
exactly.
the closest is PG32UQXR for the moment, but its not out yet.
but its not oled
Does anyone here know what would be the like minimum gpu "level" to hit ~180fps on all settings around high in this game specifically? I currently have a 2060 and get about 50-100fps on all low settings and have seen that the recommendation is a 4070 but i just wanted to know if anyone has actually gotten the frames i want, on the settings i want, with a gpu they already have tested it with.
my cpu is a 2600x if that's relevant
you probably are being bottlenecked by your cpu and basically everything else.
the performance you're asking for is probably going to be from:
(at 1440p) a 7900xt/xtx 4080/4090
but its sometimes a crapshot with this game under windows.
I can verify 4070ti will give you 165 consistently (that's as high as my monitor will go) with max settings at 1440p
@bright shard @atomic mountain
thank you both. so it seems like i'm gonna minimum need a 4070 and then see how the cpu handles that—and see if that, too, needs to be upgraded.
You don’t get 180 FPS at this game with a 4090
R4-R5 levels you get 120 max consistently and dip to 60 at times
Shows just how unoptimized this game is
you could probably eek out a little more in linux with proton, but eeeeh.
definitely runs like crap
my utilization on this game was always better with dxvk instead of straight dx
very annoying
i don't know for my 7900xt, but i don't really care about any game tweaking, because i still am only at 1080p@75
I can run cyberpunk at psycho settings better than GTFO
To put things into perspective
i hope that one performance tweak mod gets completed
It’s looking pretty good
The optimization mod increases your frames by a lot
And you don’t lose frames when flicking
waiting for cyber-pay-day to also run like crap
Do you recommend any mods? I just started playing 2077 but only vanilla.
Honestly I can't imagine that a monitor like that wouldn't ever be endgame
Outside of the fact that it eventually will do burn in, which will be mini led to take over that
I meant for visuals or QoL stuff. Nothing really game changing.
Well, maybe not even QoL stuff.
😵💫 too many negatives
are you agreeing or disagreeing
I'm saying that at that point, a 4k 144-240Hz in oled would be an endgame for a really long time
I can't imagine that it would ever not be, until mini led becomes more viable
There is 8k but who the hell is ever gonna play anything without piss poor performance on that resolution
hard agree.
unless computing really hits that breakthrough 10x discovery, 4k@160 is going to be the reasonable cap for a long time
the breakthroughs will have to be made in monitor tech to improve experience
What about for CPUs?
From what I remembered a while ago over all the discussions of the 4090 and that nearly all or pretty much all the CPUs couldn't actually keep up with the 4090 to provide a true 95-100% usage on the 4090, there was maybe something brought up for optimizations for that
I suppose it's kinda pointless but I did remember that
I think more that windows has to do optimize for CPUs I think? But I honestly don't remember anymore past that point
i think the next big thing would be getting rid of direct x entirely
its just too slow and bloated and causes issues with cpu overhead
a wholesale vulkan sort of deal
or something that could be easily translated into vulkan
full vulkan support would be cool
i know that khronos group absolutely has to be cooking something crazy up
But from what I remember it's outright worse if you're running something pre 20 series
But maybe that part is just that there isn't optimization for older GPUs to take better advantage of it
main problem is very few games are actually running straight vulkan
we dont really have a point of base comparison for the most part outside of dxvk
by the time such a shift would be feasable, 20 series would be a far memory
Yeah most of the world probably will have at least gotten a good upgrade to support true vulkan I suppose
nice i mena i build pcs and about most of em work with xmp or docp same thing. but after a stress test we find them to be unstable so we lower the mhz til we find the sweet spot of stability and performance but 4 sticks is almost always a nightmare lol
oh yeah 4 sticks is ass on ddr5
but I’m saying I can run my sticks at 6000 mt easily
(advertised speed)
and memtest does not complain
Typically, for the case of two sticks, you can get away with a bump, even past xmp.
Its likely easy because your ram was already highly binned.
I think monitors are kind of underrated by the gaming community. They’d rather spend 2000 on a 4090 for “higher quality settings” than 700 on an OLED monitor… wonder which one will do most for your experience
that’s been my experience as well
All my high refresh bros tell me going past 180hz is a scam when your monitor is already a blurry mess.
The response time is the real metric to shoot for, for clarity.
Yep.
both gtg and 0-100
an order of magnitude faster than even TN or VA
ips has always been strange
I mean, if your monitor already is like 1440p and 144hz, or higher, it's good enough either way
I like ips, the black bars on va are weird.
Outsidfe of overall colors and the black color
I had a 144hz 1440p ultrawide before my current monitor
it was a cheap VA panel
like on the cheap end of VAs
had horrible overshoot when enabling any kind of overdrive
pictures were smeared out when moving
But it's sufficient anyway, the only drawback is my PC just sorta sucks if I want to enjoy RDR2 but have it run really well with the high/est graphics
I would definitely do oled but since it has burn in, I don't really want to get one for the burn in
I'd just have to eventually wait for that one for a nice setup later on where it's not a hassle to have a secondary main monitor
Its becoming less of a problem
Im just glad plasma did not evolve into the pc space. Those things get HOT.
yeah i play at 144hz that was my jump from 60
i've seen 240hz and 200hz and it just doesnt feel different
our eyes really cant perceive that
Nah that's not really true
But yeah I'm pretty sure the main issue going up to 240hz is purely just the response times being dogshit for the refresh rate
Eyes definitely can, monitors just arent there yet.
If the refresh rate can do 240hz, but the pixels aren't able to change colors fast enough, it doesn't look any better than just having 144hz
144hz is the sweetspot in terms of good refresh and response
its been pretty much perfect
But since response times are shortened to a true range of 1 milliseconds unlike the shit lies that companies tell you about regular panels like TN/VA/IPS, it looks godtier for 240hz
i'venever played above 1080p tho
And it has practically 0 ghosting, it shouldn't look like a blurry mess
I genuinely have no clue how people come to the conclusion that you aren't able to see past a certain framerate
Your eyes aren't made of materials that computers share
They easily can surpass all monitors on resolution, refresh rate, response times that we haven't really reached with monitors yet at all, if we were to compare eyes to monitors
Eyes and brains are definitely not equal.
Well for sure not at all
But eyes can do so much more than people who assume shit and believe that you can't see past 60fps or 144fps
The outliers definitely outpace the general population
It's just simply a dumb lie, and the thing is, your eyes are actively focusing on the monitor, nothing else
It will do far better on something that isn't moving that displays image than if it were to shake around during an earthquake for example
Honestly, i wonder how many of them just forgot to change their monitors refresh rate.
reminds me of greekgodx
If i can't trust them to send an email, idgaf about what their thoughts are on rr and biology
Played on 60hz for so fucking long until one day playing apex and talked about how his current didn't feel any different from the old one
And someone said he probably forgot to set his refresh rate
I wish monitors, windows, and games were less trash at negotiating frame rates
Ah yes, please give me 60fps ootb.
it do be like that
on the serious side though, I ended up getting an OLED display and the insane response times on that panel make ghosting look surreal (it does not exist)
even playing gtfo and turning around while having a bright reflection in your fov (black to white)
that reflection will never be blurred during your turning around
always razor sharp
it’s pretty insane
it’s like I’ve always had motion blur on when playing on VA
get an 8K screen with 360hz
or else you die
no I like my monitor
oo btw if you consider oled one thing to consider is that they are seriously sensitive to light
Why are there not many white or silver motherboards?
Because they sort of just decided to set on a standard of just being darker colors
Unless you are going for a certain color scheme, like a full white out build, it usually just works with a lot of stuff
Would be nice if most of them had a color picker
Could play around with black and choose certain highlights, or have a choice of a full white
I can imagine that increasing costs quite a bit
just having white already makes it more expensive
silver is oddly specific, sounds like a one and done custom job that would be at least 3x the price
Silver being close enough to white.
but thats still different paint
and white boards are already expensive enough
being the only other color than black
ASRock have some funky colored AM5 boards like the b650 live mixer and a few blue accented boards
bUt iS It SIlVeR
For it being ugly, it has some nice specs at least from what the manufacturer claims
Unnecessary for gaming or streaming though
Like all the extreme overclocking stuff matters fuckall to the streamers and content creators lmfao
But I could buy that in any other board that does it better or doesn't look quite as fugly
"I got a i9-13900K"
"you know what to do with the K?"
"no, but it is the most powerful"
I try to look for it
And it's fucking nowhere
Do they want people to buy it or not
funny enough
they just released IEMs designed for mobile streaming
shit audio, best comfort design
the audio is bad because it is "tuned for long periods of use"
lol
13900ks😶
Highest power draw CPU at 493 recorded by hardware unboxed
Second highest being 371, with a close follow up being 355 by the 7950X
Honestly can't imagine how the fuck it's really just passable
The 12900K being the second, doesn't even hit 100c at the same time as the 13900K, which took that 17 seconds

what about TR
400W base under all core load
I don't think you could use a threadripper for multiple stuff as efficiently as just the 13900K/7950X
fair
In which I mean to be able to game, do the production work, etc. as efficiently, so pretty much sticking to the usual consumer products like the ryzen lineup
Threadrippers serve their purpose in a more specific area of computers than the ryzen/intel core lineup
fair point
my 7700x draws 135W max
still overheats though
because ryzen 7000 is HOT
ye
How much better cooling is a custom loop setup?
as compared to what? an AIO?
Depending on how it might be, it can be the same, or much better
depending on how it's built and how many radiators/reservoirs you're using, could be equal to anywhere from "close" to "nearly double the efficiency"
Like on a build shown above from like a few days ago to a week, the dude had a radiator that was the size of the entire case but thinner
That probably cools it off efficiently, and probably outdos the more popular AIOs
But considering if it's gonna be a basic custom for the CPU or GPU, I don't think it really is worth it in the long run
Doing custom loops require somewhat more maintenance, you gotta drain the water and clean it out if you see anything unwanted in the water
I generally don't reccomend people go "custom loop" unless A) you want to tinker with it and fixing/adjusting/moving/building things is fun for you, or B) you're looking to overclock and need the thermal headroom.
It's a lot more work to deal with a custom than it is to have an AIO
He's pretty much average guy who wants to play games, usual plug and play so I don't think having more maintenance on top of dust cleaning would be the best for him
It's like... Microwave popcorn (AIO) versus movie-style popcornmaker with authentic oil/seasoning/butter (custom loop)
sure, it's better, but do you really need that much overkill if you're only going to eat a handfull of popcorn? not really
Eh only depends on how the custom loop is again, overall I would say the average custom loop builds can compare to the regular AIOs
yeah, that's true
In just about a lot of cases with building a PC, you really don't have to do cutom loop. I see it only as more of a passion and want, rather than a need unless you want to do extreme/ish overclocking and maybe workstation stuff where your 13900K will start heating up with all the fat lot of wattage for the CPU
I was just looking at parts for a third PC.
I get 2, but 3?
3 sounds like a me amount of pcs
(I have 4)
although one is a laptop
so 3 I guess
I have a gaming rig, server and a laptop
hides his totals
1 gaming rig, 1 server, 1 NAS, 2 laptops, a chrome book and a work-issued laptop.
Hey guys. I think 1 ram isnt working. I build a new pc, borh rams were working. Now i made some bios changes and suddenly the ram in the 4th slot doesnt work anymore. I Put it out, now my pc boot. I put it back in and it doesnt boot. Even if i switch the working ram with the not working one it diesnt work. So its the ram and not the mb slot probably
I resetted csmos battery too. Didnt seem to fix it
to test ram, look into running a ram testing software on a bootable usb
there's lots of them out there that'll do the trick.
you want to test each stick, in each slot, to isolate if it's the stick or the slot
if you move the "bad stick" somewhere else in the chain, it's possible it's your MB slot that's faulty.
I tried it. Its the actual stickrr and not the slot
I resetted the cmos battery again and now it does work. But i get this screen
press F1
that'll load your bios. it's possible the bios is a problem, and isn't detecting something
also, you have 6 keyboards and 5 mice
enable DOCP
Enabled
quit and reboot, just to see
also, it should be like that, A2 and B2 is generally the config for most motherboards.
Ye
should work now, if you go into the bios, you should see those values.
if it booted at 6400 thats impressive for ryzen 7000
I have an ryzen 9 7900x3d
what do you mean by "kick out" ?
It's possible that it's a Lian-Li RGB controller that goes through a USB connection to get power.
look for that piece specifically, i'm sure you'll find a bunch of people asking the same question.
because although that's a fan, it's also an RGB fan with a utility/software to make it sync up with sound/effects/etc.
so because it's more than just a "standard fan" it's possible that it's showing up in your settings because something's making it show up there (like Lian-li's RGB Control Software, whatever it's called).
Ye i have the controller it connected to an usb thingsy...
@sweet bone do you know how i can make this thingy, to double up the speed of the 2 ssds?
I know that the x670e-plus supports that kind of option tho
are you talking about using raid 0?
skill issue
Yea
Is this game good on ultrawide?
I was called ultrawide in high school
Idk
Is it better in certain aspects? Yes
Define "good" for me
Okay brudda I shall define good.
Does the hammer actually take up too much room on the screen?
I see.
I've been in the market for a new monitor and had heard that it takes up a lot of space, so that's why I ask.
Your monitor is 45", is that still 21:9 aspect ratio or is it larger?
21:9 yes
It does take up a lot of space
And make sure if you're going with the new tech that you have a GPU that can handle it
I had to buy a 60" desk to commodate a dual monitor setup
My desk is pretty big so no issue there. Are the dual monitors the same model?
No
I have a 24.5"
Vertical
My monitor is pricey (ultrawide)
No way I'm getting 2 if I don't need 2
For sure. What model, if you don't mind me asking?
Which one?
the ultrawide
Get Into the Action with this 45 Inch Curved Gaming Monitor, Featuring 21:9 Aspect Ratio. Order the LG 45" UltraGear™ OLED Curved Gaming Monitor on LG.com/us.
I'm an early adopter
Appreciate the share. Honestly thought a 45" OLED would be even pricier.
Does the resolution look good to you?
For last gen the AW3432 was pretty goated
Was actually considering that until the new shit came out
Resolution is good
Especially with that refresh rate too
Honestly cracked
I always hear people say like pixel density drops off for 1440p past like 32". Then I'll look myself and think, it really doesn't look that bad.
What card do you have?
What made you want to stay at 1440 instead moving to 4k?
Could 4090 not push 4k close to 240hHz.
Ah yeah huh. I think there's a samsung that does, but besides that........
Was the 45" size a decision you made for games, or other stuff as well?
Nah it was just the only thing with 1440p and 240 Hz [insert ultrawide]
I wanted a QD OLED panel
But MSI and Samsung were coming out Q2/Q3 with that and they were gonna be 54”+
Being an early adopter and my computer at the time being broken I couldn’t really wait
You think the oled was worth it vs some of the nicer ips panels?
OLED worth
Imo
Better color, faster response times
IPS panel is fine, my alienware monitor is IPS and it's alright
You have to worry about backlighting
I was lucky and it barely has any
For sure. It sounds like it's a pretty sweet panel. You concerned about burn-in?
Kinda
Which is why I wanted a QD OLED panel
But I've been pretty diligent with the image cleaning process(es) so I think it'll last long
It also does it automatically too, which is nice
Does QD have like a safety net for burn-in?
It just projects OLED for better longevity
If you want the fancy specifics, you can do the research youself
Pretty interesting
Long story short, just helps with less burn in and stuff
I see. You're running a 4090 at 3440x1440 so that must get you dummy frames at that res.
I'm considering a 34" ultrawide, high refresh (at least 144Hz). Don't know about oled yet.
I'm still rocking a 1080Ti, so I think the resolution should be fine.
Might struggle a bit
You think those extra horizontal pixels will do it?
Maybe, I upgraded from a 10xx series card because it couldn't even run 20 FPS at 1080p
Would scare me to run 4K, probably wouldn't achieve the refresh rate even though 1808Ti is a powerhouse
I came from a 27" 2560x1440 panel at 144Hz, until it broke. I reached close to 144 fps in a lot of the games I played. I'm now on a burner 24" 1920x1080 panel at 60Hz, lel.
Ah well
I doubt 1080Tis are pushing 4k past 60fps. I'm comfortable with 1440 for higher fps.
Appreciate the sharing Void.
if you have the money I agree with void, get a qd oled monitor
burn in is an oversold issue
the monitors have built in protection AND a short timeout when no user input is given
and especially in gaming there’s no real chance of burn in
anyways
about gpus:
amd just dropped some new drivers and they seem to have boosted all 6000 cards by about 20% performance and all 7000 cards by 25-30 ish
that’s insane
I know I always tell people amd has more potential bc of raw power but I wasn’t expecting this
Don't you tend to hear that more with nVdida's cards?
No the raw power part.
oh nah no way
nvidia has less raw power for the price but usually better drivers AND a bigger feature set
which usually means nvidia falls behind in fps at native resolutions, without ray tracing and all
but when you start to enable dlss and rt, amd is nowhere
but now that they basically gave all their GPUs a 1 tier upgrade
amd should be a no brainer over any 40 series under a 4080
Oh I see what you're saying.
Nvidia still holds the position for pure brute force (4090), but the cards below that on AMD's side have proven to be a better value in recent generations. I'm starting to remember again.
I've been out of the gpu knowledge base since like 2018 so that info slides by me usually.
fair point
the 4070 is worth getting if these new drivers weren’t there
for amd
but rn
you get a 6950 xt for the same price as a 4070
which is honestly insane
they are more or less equal
6950xt is better in most games but 4070 has that feature set
both good cards for 1440p ultra 144hz tho
gtfo does the funny less fps than AAA titles tho
I think this over last month
GTFO just sucks ass in terms of performance 😩
yep
Does that also do a bit more work on the power draw too?
doesn't seem like it
Gah damn, not even home for a while to take part in this massive jump. But i also just bought a 6700xt, so my dad is gonna get a day 1 boost he wont even notice.
yep
I suppose regardless of the fact power draw is still sort of a thing, honestly can't really turn down an extra 20-30% increase for raster
I was gonna go for the 4080 but honestly
idk?
I think it was more about idle
But honestly just comparing it to the 4080, you'd be dumb to not get the 7900 XTX unless you had a specific reason whatsoever
maybe it's better for streaming because it has some encoding related extras
Ray tracing, I'm pretty sure it handles fairly well enough to not be an issue anyway
I got xt only because xtx wasnt in stock and i literally could not wait longer.
😔
They apparently were planning to make the XT the biggest seller
Dumb idiots as no one wants the XT as the XTX is literally only pennies more for better performance
Of course it eventually gets lowered
But I mean
I still would rather an XTX
I ordered the XTX 7m after the release tddttdtf 🙏
Was affraid of bots mass buying them to resell at insane prices
How
ever heard of pre-ordering?
A sin so unforgivable
No
I didn’t preorder
I quite literally ordered the day before
Just as Mayroo said
MSI sent me an email at 2 am saying that the 4090 is in stock to be ordered day before
I was playing GTFO at the time, dropped everything and paid for it
Lmao
Pre-ordering doesn’t exist in this market
Not real lol
It only ever happens after the first batch goes out and they go “out of stock preorder next batch” type shit
Even then I didn’t see that for the 4090 when it went out of stock
I was joking partly
But yeah there really isn't a pre order
I don't think any company has done a preorder right after AMD/NVIDIA announces a date and price
hello can I get pc specs and fps, I want to compare game performance
amd ryz 7 2700x + 32g mem + nvid 3060 + win11 details somewhat reduced, a solid 60fps, without vsync (max framerate 61) 1440p.
i5-8300H, 16GB, GTX 1050, Win11, having that one setting reduced, get about 40FPS at 1080p
Please also bear in mind that GTFO is not an optimized game, these game performance numbers are bound to be better in other respective games
yeah it cannot use a RTX 4090 to it's fullest extent, which is a great example of how game requirements can be jank
so if you get a top end GPU, don't expect it to just fix everything
The performance is really weird with gtfo, though a lot less weird now
Used to be that you could have a 580 but a similar ish card or only somewhat better was doing poorly iirc
Was only pretty obvious when the 2080 Ti couldn't even run the game well enough
Well maybe earlier
But yeah
5800X3D + 4090 + 32gb cant get even stay above 70fps in some cases 
get around same fps as my friend with 2080ti + 7800x3d
i get 100+ on a laptop 3060 (i have my texture resolution at half)
Yeah if you play in 420p I guess it runs smooth
SOME cases yes
my lowest fps would be in R7D1 probably
either that or R6DX
90 still though
R7 had some horrible maps for sure. i play on 5120x1440
R6DX was worse than R7D1
def
Thanks ygs
Are RTX 40 series cards still having driver issues and such? Or are they OK to buy now?
do you recall any specific issue or just a general "is it mature enough to not troubleshoot often"
I've never really heard of any issues with the 4000 series
The only issue is that the low end is just a horrible buy, the only good option is to go with a 4080 and 4090 least to my understanding
Unsure of what the 4070 ti was like, but I don't think it was really received too well?
Which was just improper installation iirc
Yep
Just make sure to push that connector in
Honestly, don't understand how people did it
Don't be scared to break it
I actually think they're dumbfucks ngl
Because when I installed mine there is a massive audio click
Like, very noticible
It's like the 24 pin for the motherboard, you are gonna have to, and you won't break it
I just heard from someone that the 40 series were bad to buy, and they cited "driver issues".
I have no idea where that comes from
like others said, the only reason it's a bad buy is the price
Maybe that was like a very near day one version
By then, it's already been like 3 months?
I was thinking of just getting a 3090 ti.
Far more than enough time for it to be great software side
Hi there, im playing on my dads laptop and ould I be able to run the game on a Intel Core i5-1135G7, intel iris xe graphics and 8 gb ram? I dont mind if it looks pixilated, just wanna know if it would be playable?
yo
Reading the minimum requirements on the steam page (https://store.steampowered.com/app/493520/GTFO/) it seems like your PC can handle it
Your team of prisoners is dropped into the Rundown when a new Work Order is issued by The Warden, the mysterious entity holding you captive. The Rundown is a series of expeditions, each one taking you deeper into a decayed research facility called The Complex. You descend level by level, scavenging tools and resources that help you survive in a...
$26.79
34974
78
But you'll be on lower graphics
Awesome thanks
Np!
Would you by any chance know what fps I could get?
Those requirements are there a for a reason, use them :)
Ah
That would be too specific
I couldn't tell you
Ah ok cool
map depends a lot on fps
or the other way around
like your computer explodes if you ever restart from a checkpoint on r7c3
if theres a way for a user to break something, it will break
To be fair I suppose a lot of new beginners started doing their first builds with it
That or they somehow didn't expect it to be actual effort to push it in like a lot of the previous cards
NO! What would you pay for it where you are from? I really doubt it would be worth the money
Only 40 series card actually worth the money is ironically the 4090
i'd honestly say wait till the 50 series, if you can and save up for it rather
Nah you cannot be sure what will become of the 50 series, 4090 was the only good card and it launched at around 2k for the cheapest model in Europe, you can expect exactly the same for the 50 series or even more
remember when we complained about the prices of the 30 series and also said "wait until 40 series"
- scalpers to high heaven
lol
It's never really been a better time for a while
You'll be alright with waiting to buy a 4090
Especially since I think the scalper issue has been a non issue lately
It's cause chip prices went down
Nvidia also lowered prices for all GPUs before that too
Watch 50xx series cards come and more scalpers arise
Who knows, you'll just have to watch the market(s)
I suppose
but just gonna be standard for all releases now since whenever RTX 2000 came out unfortunately
But Scumvidia is also keeping the 4090 at msrp in Europe at just under 1.6k so price reduction is also an illusion
Still better than 4060/4060TI/4070/4080. All of them shit value and shit cards. All of them could have been good but no Shitvidia needed to nerf them so they fit in their shitty little power brackets of how good they want them to be, not how good they can be
Shit value, sure. Shit cards? Debatable depending on the card
Cards below starting at the 4070Ti start to get really spotty
4080 is alright, main complain was quite literally just price
I mean yeah sorry, wording. The cards are not good for what you pay
Still power efficiency of the 4090 alone is just worlds above the rest of the 40 series. Either you spend the money for 4090, or you go AMD or 30 series for less money. Those are the smart decisions imo
I mean, if not the 4090, you can just go with the 7900XTX especially with the recent performance boost update
Just about far more performance in raster for 1000$ than you'll get with the 4080
Exactly what im saying
im in asia so the prices are relatively higher, and i think it also went up recently (but im not sure cuz i wasn't keeping up to date)
but yeah a lot of my friends are just saving up for when the 50 series drops, and that's just an option
Somehow i doubt its going to be a successful launch for them but of course i hope the cards are good and not that expensive. But it seems unlikely especially since the first one they will launch will be the Titan again (5090)
False hopes, I’ll bet it’ll be hell of a card but it’s gonna be expensive still
Happened for 2 generations so far
Doesn’t help that in the US inflation is rising and chips got more expensive overall
Yeah i dont expect it but i can still hope for those that dont want to throw their money away
These are big tech companies we are talking about. Prices will always probably be shit and you’ll have to pay it anyways in reality
They care about profits mainly
Yeah because nvidia has no competition and amd is shitting the bed
nvidia doesn't have competition in the top end, but for the rest amd is way better value
nvidia is putting minimal effort because of the focus on milking AI
Me with the 4070ti. 😢
First PC, first card. I couldn't justify spending more than what I already did for the GPU.
Yeah, 4060TI for example is really just a shit card. 3060TI but more expensive
3060 TI but with the access to DLSS 3.0 stuff and perhaps better ray tracing which is either better, the same for the most part, or even worse due to the fact most of the specs are worse than the 3060 Ti
ah yes totally, a hundred megabytes of cache will be just enough to replace 500GB of VRAM, sure
I upgraded from the 10xx series cards, due upgrade time for me
Yeah i love frame generation especially all the extra input lag it generates😂
The only use for frame generation is singleplayer games with not a lot of quick input needed
But then again, graphically, it looks far more worse
So yeah
Frame generation is honestly just a big joke
Just make a better card instead of adding some dumb shit that can make more frames that aren't even rendered realisitcally
If 50 series has a single 8gb card
They are officially mocking the unknowing consumer market
Aint no way my mom just found my 2ds that I had lost for 7 years 
The days of 8gb vram being okay are gone, 16 shouldbe been the standard in the 30 series already
I mean, 8GB is still alright
But tbf
Considering that they can actually make a 5060 that is more like a 5060 than a 3060, yeah, at this point make it 12 or 16GB
It's just the whole Intel and 4 cores maximum thing at this point
They have to budget for this shit instead of making better looking game, just because nvidia forces 8gb on most consumers
Apparently they just got tired of that and said fuck it, we'll just make the game and not give a shit about 8GB for the most partt
They should have just went and made games that couldn't realistically just be sufficeable with 8GB long ago
Could have helped to pressure NVIDIA to moving up on the amount long ago
They already have
4070 looks like a decent value to me as well, for me it is 4060ti and down which are just hilariously bad
but 4070 actually competes with the 6950xt and trades blows at the same price point
which is impressive bc 6000 radeon is usually the better deal
a little funny thats what you think
probably think Garden of Ban Ban is optimized
"oh it runs on 40 series so it must be fine"

What
are you waffling on about

this is the radio from that stupid game
count the number of polygons you see
and compare it to what is actually rendered
do you seriously think that polygon count is worth what the end result is
^ GTFO in a nutshell
Except instead of polygons it’s a bunch of shapes stacked on top of each other
High fidelity graphics
Bro
Everything looks like it was made by a 3 year old
💀
Besides
The game has actually killed and damaged some computers
lol
"we need more than 8GB of VRAM in budget cards!"
I mean, in some understandable aspects, sure
Just 12GB and that should offer enough room
Surely they're not gonna make the 3060 Tiv3 again, I hope at least
I mean yeah eventually would need more
like how for a Windows system, 8GB is the minimum for decent use
Nvidia: 8 is enough now buy our overpriced cards!
yeah adding more VRAM is only going to drive up the price
you know that right
nVIDIA isn't going to magically lower prices to "make it more fair"
They never had a fair price after the 1080 Ti anyway
it's like people saying iPhone should switch to USB-C so iPhones "can charge faster" or "transfer data faster"
no they are switching to USB-C now
but they can totally keep the same slow speeds and charging as before
it isn't a magic "oh I got you now mega corp" solution
granted I will enjoy seeing the iPhone 15 with USB-C so all chargers are finally the same shape
Except the prices have absolutely no relation to cost anymore, they are just pricing and bottlenecking cards to fit into their desired tiers of card. Amd understood the importance of vram
Also vram is getting a lot cheaper so price really isnt an argument for them to
-not put in more or
-increase prices while putting in adecuate amounts
They might go wireless right?
It’s either they go USB C or they just go completely wireless for the iPhone
Honestly I don’t even know why this is a choice for Apple, everything else in their lineup (besides AirPods) uses USB C
I think they have to provide usb C
apple doesn't want to do it because they make money on every lightning cable sold, the reason they don't want to switch to usb-c is greed
Not necessarily
Apple could just go completely wireless if they didn’t want to put in USB C
Albeit it would be very dumb
Kinda cool kinda not cool at the same time
Yea but it’s already done
Could be so easy
But no, we love proprietary things
hey i have a problem, for some reason gtfo is totally mute when i start the game. Other audio works fine. I cannot choose any audio device from within game settings as there are no options to do so
edit: I fixed it, sorry for disturbing! Just had to reconnect bluetooth earphones and then disconnect again while game was running
bluetooth headphones while gaming are cancerous
suddenly windows does something in the background and "your headphones are now in headset mode, enjoy the 8khz mono audio from your game"
at worst u have to quit game and relaunch to gain "normal" quality again
Some manufacturors are just evil
Like bruh why does my bluetooth headset need a fucking dongle
I ALREADY HAVE BLUETOOTH
stop making your product reliant on me not losing a 1"x1" piece
Which isn't even usefull
does the game run well on the steam deck?
What does the steam page say
The console is going to be an annoyance
i meant desktop my bad
like does it crash often etc
well yea sorta you can use the deck in desktop mode which just boots up linux and then its a regular computer
idk if its powerful enough cus ive been hearing the game has optimisation issues
Ah steamOS
i'm pretty sure the plugged in mode is like
the exact same fucking thing
Unless steam page is wrong
That should be good
ight
Plus you get 2h for refund tbf
Just gotta make sure you don't stay in game while looking for lobby in #lfg
yea ik its just my game wasnt booting this morning even tough it was working just fine yesterday
just got it to work too
idk how well the steam deck would do with gtfo
But tbf most PCs won't really have a problem if they're like low playable/mid range I guess?
And by low playable, barely just enough to hit 60fps
It has ridiculously poor optimization in quite a handful of cases though
did it just now
thats old news
the EU already forced any big phone company to use USB-C or else they can't sell in the EU
which is why the iPhone 15 is going to have USB-C
also yeah, literally every other Apple product uses USB-C, pretty absurd it required laws getting put in place just for the iPhone to switch over
would be interesting to see a fully wireless phone to begin with
surprised no Android manufacturer tried it yet
Ye ye
but i think the Android boom died when LG phones died
Android only has folding screens going for it now
in terms of unique hardware
There has been wireless charging phones
But honestly I don't see a good reason for it
Cable charging is so easy to have and carry around to any place that offers electricity
Android doesn't really need unique hardware tbh
A 250€ phone that does everything I need is nice
Yeah, I don't care much for whatever extra software there is
It just has to have at least a charging port, headphone port, and runs well enough
Yeah
Spending 1.2k on a phone because it "takes good pictures" is insane
I'm not playing fortnite on my phone
Just buy a cheap phone and buy a separate, better quality camera, lmao
Yeah that's pretty much why cameras exists
Though depending on how new your phone is, it should be far more than sufficient to offer high quality images
I like having a good phone
I spend money on phone cameras not because it’s great value compared to getting a dedicated camera (which I have btw) but because I appreciate just having a swiss army knife of tech with me
My 6 year old phone kinda slow, want to upgrade to something with octacore
paying 700€ more to post to onlyfan isn't a great return to investment
and it's not like I go on trips and wanna take 16000x9000 pics
Damn, someone getting an octacore, I heard this one guy who was bragging about getting a hexacore but that sounds so small
Keep in mind these phone processors cores are generally cut down ecores, on top of being mobile processors. If your phone cost more than 300 usd and you didn't get 8, you either got a very fancy 6 core, or you got ripped off
All i want is to open a web page and not want it to chug and choke on Javascript abominations
Fuck web 2.0
My dinky tablet was 150$ and it has an 8core
Works well for aniyomi/tachiyomi/newpipe
This has strong "this is a fucking website" vibes
AND THE SKY IS BLUE
the question I asked, to make it more clear, "a portless phone"
eSIM exists, wireless charging exists, NFC, and bluetooth
so it's entirely possible
but no one has done it yet
It probably wouldn't sell that well
this is probably the most based take I've seen
though the main issue with cheap phones, is that the CPU can be cheap
which affects general use
but yeah all of these people going "omg this Samsung S23U takes the best photos ever"
meanwhile it's like
get an actual camera if you want good photos
it's cheap to get a 1 inch sensor
and it's already leagues ahead of a smartphone camera
Sony only just broke into the 1/2 inch size for smartphones
and that phone, the Xperia 1 V, costs at least $1400
Actually, modern phones are so good that in certain situations they are the best tools for the job in terms of fotography/videography
For a decent camery body you start at like 1k, when you buy all the lenses you need you go far beyond that. Phone is very good
Good camera is worth it if its youe profession or you like taking photos so much that you think its worth it (in which case you should try to monetize anyway)
Some lenses i use are over 2k€, thats a single lens without body, i think its clear that a phone that takes pictures but also works as a phone is more worth it
Huh
does this guy think filming a movie is done on an S23 Ultra that James Cameron pulled out of his sweaty pocket
smh what do you think? Obviously it was
It clearly has the best camera and rivals even the best of dedicated studio cameras
I didnt say that...
been asking around and apparently if you have a recent flagship
its kinda true
unless you need that professional aspect, a Pixel 7, S23, iPhone 13/14, or Xperia 1 V, is good enough for most people
also that smartphones dominate the sub $2000 market for cameras
dedicated cameras are better but only if you have the skill and time
or just need that $5000+ camera quality
also just like, remember to clean your smartphone camera lens before taking a picture
Keeping my fingers off the lens truly is a challenge

Yeah im not lying to you
Good phones are perfectly good cameras for amateurs
who the fuck reacted to my message
It was maggie
Who is Maggie
maggie
Maggie is maggie

Hm.
Hmmm
A friend of mine
Tried downloading the game and got the “your pc dont meet the requirements for this game”

Is anyone really knowledgeable about building computers? I just put my new computer that I had built recently into a new case and now one of my hard drives is locked somehow, the boot drive, if anyone can help me please message me directly
If anyone sees this or can help message me directly
LMAO
Deserved
windows? did u change motherboard? tpm module comes to mind..
I figured it out, I'm good
.. windows install disk, google bcdedit... ah good nth 🙂
We kinda curious now
the tale as old as time
you browse many a web forum, seeking answers, many questions
countless time spent, your fingers ache from the scrolling
your mind drowsy
you perk up, finally the answer is given
laying your sore eyes across the screen, reading the text; "nvm I figured it out myself"
I never felt so attacked by one of your messages
mama mia
Yes
anyone that's worked in IT for any lenght of time knows this pain.
hehe I broke my cpu cooler today
Tfw when i move my pc long distance, cpu cooler and gpu are coming out
upgrade bios - remember running 3200mhz dram - set it so - bluescreen twice mid-game - back to auto 🙂
what do you mean "locked"?>
i put the parts into a new case, forgot to put power to boot drive ssd, the screen was telling me that drive was locked, but it wasnt even recognizing the drive. i gave it power and unplugged all the other drives and its all good now
right but I was just replacing my cpu
and I dun goofed up
new one was overheating so I decided to remount the cooler tighter
bad idea
broke the screws
now it’s not making contact anymore so I guess that’s an aio dead
oh yikes
fr

THE GOOD ENDING
HE REPLIED
Oooo tech support
How may I help you
My name is Hamid, I have only been here for a short distance
Hey Hamid, so my friend is selling me his pc but it has an overheating issue, what should i do to fix it?
Is it a closed loop watercooler or an air cooler?
Air cooled
Then question two would be how many fans does it have and do they have clearance from cables or possible hard drives?
Happen to know which one?
I can do my best to get photos of it
Pretty sure that cables “in front” (subjectively) that affect airflow was debunked quite a while ago
If GPU overheat, maybe need clean and repaste with Mayroonaise™️
If CPU is overhead maybe need clean and repaste with Mayroonaise™️
There's a fair bit you can do to resolve overheating of the CPU, like repasting the cpu with new cooling paste, a pea sized dot spread over it would suffice already
you sending me some if i get the sponsorship deal?
If both are fine, maybe Dusty is in your case
Cable blockage of airflow is most definitely an influence of temp increase
got it got it
I don't think cables can make a big difference in how it performs
i wouldnt doubt they effect it, but not as much as paste would
Apparently that isn't sufficable anymore, two lines of paste and spreading it evenly on the whole CPU works far better than a pea blob and pressure
Likely due to size increase over the generations of CPUs maybe
But I said spread out over the cpu die
o alright
Best to diagnose which component is overheating by checking it with speccy, in case it's an amd processor you gotta get the amd master utility program but speccy shows Intel cpu and whatever GPU Temps.
could also get msi afterburner and turn on the gpu and cpu temps and play a game or use stress test to figure out what it is
Pea blob is fine for am4-am5 but for Intel 12-13 gen the CPU's are too big for that
I typically do the cellotape masking and spread with plastic wrapped finger
Then smooth with plastic card
Basically oem preapplied paste quality
Works well
Consistent.
Me with a graphite pad 
how good are they? I don't see people using them all that much
Great, less messy when swapping AIOs and shit, very flexible for any CPU, has minor performance gains over typical paste
Reusable and has better longevity
Kinda want to get one for my server so I don't need to worry about repasting it
I 1000% recommend
what is overheating?
as in
what component
am5 cpu check reddit for cooler compatibility. AM4 coolers fit in the backplate holes but because of the move from PGA to LGA, the AM5 cpu’s are actually “lower” and may not make proper contact with your cooler depending on the bracket provided
I had this issue with my nzxt coolers. They sell AM5 brackets now
the AM4 brackets don’t put enough mounting pressure on the cpu to transfer heat correctly, or, in nzxt’s case, may even cause your cooler contact plate to hover above the CPU. I had 80c in BIOS
odds are if your screws/brackets stop your cooler from going down without feeling gradually more resistance on the screws before that, your cool plate is not touching the CPU and you WILL overheat
Not looking for advice but I just fixed my pc and I’m very happy about it
A byte
geforce 'x
must feel good to have the rig power up and shines and goes brrrr as it should. cool stuff.
needs more X
someone with 3060?
ye
I’ve got a 3060
adjust your fan curves :o
mine just sounds like coil whine (it’s very quiet but the mic tunes it up)
nah I like the noise
my bro
I have a wack Chinese gpu 
meat computer
IShowMeat
omg yes!1
Yo, i got some big issues going on here with my new pc. Can anybody help me? Google cant help me either
CPU red light.
Once I was building that pc, i Had an similar issue. The RAM stick which was plugged into the 4th slot, caused my pc to not boot. Switching the slots didnt help, only running my computer with the left stick was working. I gave them back, got the same product but new ram sticks. Now i was using it again for a couple of days. Maybe a week or two. Now i probably have the same issue again. Red light cpu. For some reason, resetting my BIOS a few times was working the last time with the old sticks. But comeon, do I have to reset the bios every like 2 weeks for like 6 Times in a row?🥲
Specs:
X670e-plus WiFi
Amd ryzen 9 7900x3d
Rtx 4070ti
G Skill 6400mhz 32gb Trident Z5
For some reason my keyboard is lightning and powered too, it doesnt do it usualy when i have my pc turrned off. It just is like as my pc would be fully booted
many motherboards have a "charge from usb port" setting, keeps mouses and keyboards lit
But why the heck is it lightning, when my pc is turned off. Usualy when my pc was working completly fine, my keyboard wasnt lightning once my pc was turned off
Like, it suddenly stops working the next day i wanna boot it 🥲
i've had that happen when unplugging and replugging my PC power supply or after recovering from a circuit breaker pop. The LED stuff
First, my cpu is orange, then red.
I have an updated BIOS, no beta Version. Rams are correctly sticked into the right spots.
potential things that come to mind:
mounting pressure getting variations because of heat, sometimes just right, but always on the line of not being correct
bios version being old, overall stability likely improved
memory controller on CPU not the best, try keeping RAM at 6000 speed
Has AMD fixed voltage issues with memory controller and ram on X3D chips?
If not that may be what's causing the issue
Yea, my mb only supports 6400 and my rams are working on 6400 too. Idk how to make it more down tho. Specialy when i cant boot my pc
what kind of voltage issues? the catastrophic failure thing seemed resolved with bios updates
Did it? Then nvm
at least the failures stopped popping up
I just recall something about voltage and CPU with new X3D fucked up
It fucked up my non-X3D chip as well
Hmm 😕
yeah, even GN felt confident enough to call it "resolved"
there's some suspicions that it could still impact CPU lifespans without a failure but hardly any evidence for now
In the bios there should be a setting to set your memory speed to 6000
I have an MSI X670 Ace
So it exists
Try it
resetting bios not doing the trick anymore?
I cant boot my pc
You can't even access the bios?
Nope
Damn
Yep
Remount your CPU cooler
Fully black screen stuck
Tried
Not working
The screws are fine
Im using all in one water cooling tho
kinda low on simple things to try, if you think you can be careful I'd take out the CPU and inspect for bent pins
Cant i remove the one ram stick and then go into BIOS?
No, im highly sure the bent are fine
you need at least one stick of RAM
Haha piece of Shit pc
if u psu full off / on power reset, no beeps on power-on?
One ram stick works again
ahh nth
Huh?
It doesnt work still, nvm
usually "bricked" pc beeps a few times if there's a no display problem
i'd go by https://www.asus.com/support/FAQ/1046157 once it starts acting up
It gets weirder and weirder...
Display Port sign was there, but no mb logo popped Up
i'm suspecting the power supply, fails to deliver volts/amps under load
had a psu that was fine for days, hours, then later stages, just minutes.. load it a bit and boom gpu shut off
@viscid prism What PSU are you running?
