#what's the full process of changing the license of a wiki's content? and is it a good idea?
15 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
You need permission from anyone whose made an edit before to change the license of existing contributions
Yep. Everyone who has made nontrivial changes need to be on board.
With that said if your wiki uses CC BY-SA 4.0 it is already difficult to port changes back to Fandom which still uses CC BY-SA 3.0. 3.0 and 4.0 are one way compatible.
oh ok
would i be able to relicense images that were posted to fandom and moved to the miraheze wiki, and then claim that fandom doesn't have the rights to use them?
If you have made adaptations to the original image and license the new image under CC BY-SA 4.0, then it would be harder for the Fandom wiki to use the adapted version, but they still can.
I strongly recommend learning more about the CC license if you want to rely on it.
alright
Legally, they can't use the adapted version, as long as it is changed to 4.0, since Fandom is under CC BY-SA 3.0
CC licenses aren't backwards compatible
You can always add a notice on the page that says "this page is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0". And images in particular can be licensed separately from articles.
Maybe I'll finish https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/User:PetraMagna/CC some day. Probably need to run it through T&S for some screening though.
This page aims to explain what the share-alike clause in a Creative Commons (CC) license usually entails. The most commonly used licenses on wikis are CC BY-SA and...