#offtopic-discussion
1 messages · Page 126 of 1
being scared of death is fine
fear of death is honourable
(im in a place where i cant really watch it right now, but i've seen it before)
Seeing it is one thing; have you heard it? With the music? o.====.o?
just the thought of not existing is crazy bro, but you wouldnt even know, like before you were born
it's quite natural
fear of being forgotten is definitely scary
but if you try to be remembered, you're going to set yourself up to be forgotten.
I'd definitely read Ozymandias, nice poem
non-existence is both scary and weird
quite truly
dunno about that exact video but i have seen one similar with the same cat video as its base
Oh, okay, owo.
went from existential dread to cat video to existential dread
nothing is pretty weird and scary
because nothing is nothing. It's lack of anything. So nothing really gets yah .
Because it's impossible to exist. So you can't really think ponder about it welly
wild
I can find a cat video about existential dread, does that help, owo?
for me the scariest part about death has to be family and friends being sad and also pain, wouldnt want my death to be painful
i think just finding peace with it is the best way to go about it
nothing doesnt exist, nothing is nothing, you cannot be nothing because nothing isnt
pretty much
Okay but what are your thoughts about the number "zero", owo?
finding peace with the inevitability of death is a good way to do it
it's why i love absurdism and melodrama
it's wacky. Probably a way of defining/coping with the meaning of life
but I enjoy it
its a number (or is it vsauce theme starts playing)
life is weird.
Why not be weird with it
fr
bought the vsauce vinyl for my birthday!!
real
Dear goodness, Vsauce's writers are interesting.. XD
pretty much.
well
pretty "no much"
nothing just isnt
Or is it? *Vsauce music intensifies. o.=.o.*
wonder if ill be reincarnated
or go to an afterlife
but then the thought of just being immortal means nothing matters i feel
i could have literally been george washington and ill never know
never really liked the idea of reincarnation
doesn't really make much sense from a mixed science x theology view
if reincarnation is true wouldnt that mean that consciousness and life is limited in quantity
not everything has to make sense
hmm
not wrong
its easy for everything to have a meaning, but its also as reasonable for it not too… - me
what happens after death is for the dead to experience
and ME (I am Hades)
once you die, yes
oh
what happens when a god dies?
from what you read, gods don't really die
everything could make sense, its just that not everything might make sense within our understanding of everything
from what i read?
figurative read, not literal. Sorry
they are, by definition, incapable of death
how would one end the story of a god if not by death
the only thing close to death is with characters like Kronos or Ouranos
thered be no ending
you don't
a god falling into eternal sleep and being incapable of waking up could be classified as death
it's innately chaotic
pretty much
I had a shower thought story in my mind a few days ago about this
oh yeah
in terms of the point of view of gods being mythology
looking at people like Helios
by definition a god that stops being worshipped is no god
When ideas can die so can gods.
Which is obviously not the same as death in living things.
a god is an idea more than a thing
from the point of humans creating these characters
yes. It's all faith.
by defintion a god needs to be worshipped to be a god
so once a god is forgotten (and subsequently stops being worshipped) it is no longer a god
well, that's by our definitions
you used our definitions to defend the point that a god cannot die in the way a human can
why do, if god(s) exist
they need to rely on us? Why interact with us at all?
if a god exists then we might not know anything about it, we wouldnt know its power nor anything
all we know of gods has been defined by humans
gods, by default, are the definition of not dying.
Dying, by default as well, can only be defined by our experiences because death cannot be experienced in any other way to what we know
but the idea of gods interacting and needing humans is purely a concept made by humans and has no physical basis
real
why does a god need to be immortal, who made that definition?
Same with the idea of gods.
because then the norse gods arent gods at all
Thor dies in ragnarok just like so many other gods
there is only ONE god and its name is MEGALANIA
You can't just say "needing worship" is made up by humans, but "not dying" is not.
to be fair, i forgot about norse
the only god i feel like is and always will be is everything
i never stated not dying is man-made
i said dying is a physical aspect
who says dying has to be physical
when your brain shuts off, you just poof no?
I think the definition of "god" is intentionally rather broad to allow lots of different people to rally about it.
If you get too specific you end up like those cultist weirdos.
i mean
yes the idea of gods existing is human
but that's not the argument
some religions exist like such. Jainism, for example.
Well, there are atheist religions, too.
that's Jainism, for example.
the argument was if a god could die (and what would happen after), Isaac brought out "by definition a god cannot die" and thats where it started
arguments about non-sensical things that make you think are fun
to be fair though
Norse gods aren't really pure gods
in contrast to Greek Mythos
which the gods derive from chaos itself
"pure god" is a weird term
it's not really a proper term
what makes a god pure, if i may ask
I would call a god that is "more like a human" less "pure" than a god that is "more like reality".
a god that is "more nature than man" is more pure than a god that is "more man than nature you" mean?
with Norse
you could argue, due to Idunn's apples, that they were turned into such
as the apples gave them such ability to live long
BUT to be fair
Norse mythos is quite painfully obscure due to stuff
I think that doesn't quite grasp it, because that would make a tree god more pure than a human god.
demigod!
(i meant more like "a god that is more a concept/force of nature")
(man accidentally pressing Enter before done writing is annoying)
But just... look at Zeus... a horny dude with immense magical powers that cannot die.
Then look at the Christian god (not just Jesus, the whole thing) - in comparision that's quite the cosmic horror entity.
to be fair, are Aesir human?
the Abrahamic god is a being beyond everything, it is a nice example of a "true pure god"
Well, it could be an angel situation where the depictions kind of became "disney-fied" into superhumans.
Abrahamic god is defined as pure omniscience (all the omnis)
Hellenistic gods are a bit more weird with their "abilities" in their presence .
they more like immortal but to time
and can be killed
with exceptions ig
the Abrahamic god is defined as everything
well, everything minus everything
right
not limited
but also still limited
can do everything, and nothing
you can't really define such
stopped by their laws? Who knows
What am i reading
forknifef
but we'll never know
or maybe we will
who knows (yay!!)
when me and Isaac discuss obscure concepts and things its always fun
^
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vsL6NtTsUM
someone posted this before but i gotta say, this has to be the most accurate depiction of Rajang
dk rajang moment
A 'pure' god would not build humans in their image nor have human properties/appearance
Because being human, being natural, means being imperfect
(Mind if i chime in a little, i like that kind of discussions)
being human is to be human, a true pure god would be beyond that
says who?
who knows
i mean
how would we know
what if it's an "Adventure Time" scenario
A god would not even care about humans or create them 'in his image'
Because tbh all that humans got going for them is above average intellicence compared to many other species
thats the whole point i dont believe in it. Its so twistable every time
but how would we know this
Islam says god gave humans their imperfections as a "test"
so when intrusive thoughts hit, a person is measured by their ability to cast them aside
why not?, who are you to define what a god can and cannot do, what it will do, and wont do
To me a god is just a fictional transcendent being thats historically invented most likely by an upper class to keep the lower class in control. Smart idea
you dont have to believe in a god, its still fun to discuss what it may be, how it may be defined
true
Well, nobody
Neither are other people
Why would a god even do that? Just to have some fun watching a species rise and fall? Checks out lmao
why would it, why wouldnt it, both are equally useless answers
but that uselesness can be ignored
Maybe a god created the entire universe but focuses on a whole other planet and earth is just an overlooked byproduct of reality
that's the thing
who knows
kind of that and our ego
humans cannot accept a reality where you get nothing after you die
hence those countless afterlives depicted differently in each culture
the possibilities are quite and truly endless
- to explain things that were unknown
what is a god?, what isnt a god?
🤯
Humans (a lot of them at least) also cannot accept that they might not be the chosen ones, the center of all that exists
Causing them to invent religions, and twisting them to their own will until it is no longer about their so-called creator, but themselves and their power over other people
a god could be incomprehensible and impossible to understand, or it couldnt
to me, the question of "if universe is expanding on lightspeed, what is it expanding inside of?" is the more important question than whether or not god is real
I think to be a god it needs to be personified. Otherwise you could call reality itself a god, which in turn would make most atheists monotheists.
who's to say reality itself isnt a god
What if reality is a god
And the universe only exists in its dreams?
Ever expanding like dream worlds do
if universe is expanding on lightspeed, what is it expanding inside of
maybe nothing, maybe something, impossible to know, impossible to find out
Then the "only" is unwarranted.
kinda crazy that 2 mammals f’d eachother millions and millions of years ago and here we all are talking in discord about philosophy
if a dreamer is a god, then every living human is a god within their own mind
you had to ruin it!
something exploded billions of years ago
and it had to DO THIS
ye, but tbf ppl think too much about that stuff. So many ppl spend their life following rules (maybe for nothing) just because of that sole reason. Which is absurd to me cuz i dont see wild animals, plants etc pray and sacrifice stuff to avoid hell or what not. Why would all organisms except humans be punished or gifted a benefit just by the way of living
not just mammals, also those before
That's how i see it
Everyone is the god of their own thought worlds
so real
"because we humans are speshal!"
it all comes down to that false assumption.
literally anything that made that thing not to do something couldve made you and all your ancestors not exist, its so weird to think about
If you need to follow a strict set of rules to be a good person and avoid eternal punishment, then you are not a good person
then why wouldnt you fixate on a fun little thing created in your own dreams (im going back to your argument that "a god wouldnt fixate on something small and insignificant like humans")
whats a good person
their own camera
their own canvas
their own brain
their own experienced definitions of the absurd fluid that is life
could have, could maybe not have, is it actually random?
Ye literally. I think some christians believe that its because we can rationally think and reflect, that we can "take care if the earth" and depending on how de do that u get punished or not. Well we re not doing a good job then
that of the perceived opposite of a bad person
existence is really fragile
if the asteroid didnt hit the earth that day, we wouldnt be here
or if life didnt decide to invent photosynthesis and chose to gulp down volcanic fumes at the bottom, we woudlnt be here
True
Might have contradicted myself here
So yes, a god could focus on creating life to let it roam free
which is only defined by the experiences of a person
good and bad are subjective
Exactly
not really, if your great great great great great great great grandfather decided to meet another woman you would have literally not existed
quite truly only exist due to the experience of the individual
Maybe a conciousness had existed, in your place, but not you
maybe, but that cannot actually be proven can it?
Not really, they are usually informed by empathy and utilitarianism both of which aren't subjective at all.
like a balance
if you live in a world of good
what makes good good?
why isnt empathy subjective
It kinda can, like u cant get the exact dna sequence if it werent for certain parents. Even if the same parent have other babies its different every time
I'd say it's far more experiential
can you prove that a being that exists wouldnt exist if something different was done in the past
Because it's not just a viewpoint. Yes, it's your empathy, but i wouldn't call your mom subjective either.
Good things might be what brings the subjectively best outcome to a problem
But wouldn't a villain act good then, if he acts in his own will?
No, that is egoistical
So "good" is hard to define
i forgot the exact number of you being alive, but yeah i feel like it could
because someone's mother is physical matter
empathy is just chemicals
Everyone has different levels of empathy and a different moral compass
empathy is understanding and feeling emotions, emotions can be subjective
Theoretically no but the amount of dna combinations for the same thing are so low its virtually zero. So also yes but no
right, its highly likely (like an almost infinite likeliness) but it cannot be truly proven
one cannot yet prove that changes to the past would change the present
But the fact that there are never been born 2 ppl completely the same in history can kinda confirm it i guess. Otherwise it already would have happened
also its weird to think about why we had to exist. I mean i could've just not exist entirely but i have this first person view and i take it for granted because i dont know any better.
will I always exist? i wont and thats kind of scary. Maybe i get to have my consciousness, maybe I wont ever have this understanding of existence ever again. What if i wasnt an animal or just not a human, do i get to exist the way i do? AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Playin Monster hunter is easier
So a whole species devoid of emotion and only focused on action would be ideal, wouldn't it?
And nobody can make the argument that they 'couldn't live without happiness' because they don't have bad feelings either
Like robots, but organic life forms
No, emotion is very useful in cooperation, which is the basis of what is "good" in the first place.
why would a species without emotion be ideal?
why are emotions not ideal?
define emotions? Is being stressed an emotion?
If so then that would be really bad
Maybe death is just having your conciousness and personality reborn into a new body? A new start from rock bottom, to make new choices?
Or eternal nothingness, just ceasing to exist altogether?
well
empathy creates emotion
you can't really balance good from such without an opposite defining aspect (bad)
Sure, you could cooperate without emotion, but that seems a lot harder, especially since cooperation in nature seems to correlate rather heavily with emotion, moreso than with intelligence.
our shared understanding of "Good" is what keeps us and others alive in comfort (since that is ideal)
emotions are traits of animals that we know of designed to help you survive and react under circumstances
emotions may not be the way to go about it with an "ideal" species
our understanding of life is limited to that of Planet Earth's
good itself is based on understanding, which is inherently subjective
i highly doubt that because what is my consciousness and how does it get to exist without my human body/mind
it's why young kids who live in abused households don't really understand what's going on till they experience the outer world
Sure they're young. But, heck, it still applies from above. If you don't experience, you don't grow
Things we view as bad often happen as a result of emotions overwhelming or controlling a person
If we say 'this person has no heart, no emotion' they may just be full of negative emotion like fear, hatred or hopelessness
looking at bullies at schools
right, you can see this in the past as well (for example: slavers saying and thinking slavery is good)
So yes, having them is good, just not too much of it
Because too much of a good thing might get you a bad thing
"Eternal nothingness" isn't so "nothing" actually, because the choices you made will stick with the world, potentially forever.
the past is eternal, everything you have done you have done
The choices and impressions you left will stay, you will not
Your name may be remembered but nobody gets to see or touch you anymore
The body is gone
The mind is gone
The actions stay
emotions are repulsive
but they always dont have to be that way
Since one's personality is their entire self and that defines their emotions, someone having no emotions wouldnt still have emotions as in not having emotions? its weird
but again, we're trying to define life from what we saw on a smol rock
your actions will change the world and time forever
as long as forever is
how do we prove that when before we woke up actually happened and is the same version of ourselves and not just memories
everything that has ever been done, has been done, and that will never change
yeah okay "todd howard"
How do we prove the universe didn't just pop into existence 2 seconds ago and everything before that is just "lore"?
never heard that one before
How do we prove we are not in a hyper realistic dream state that, unlike our 'sub-dreams', have feelings and sensation
Maybe we are our higher dimensional selves, connected by a dream that doesn't cover their whole sensory world just like our dreams don't cover ours
yes 
we cant, but most evidence tends to point that the universe was created many billion years ago, could that evidence be fake? maybe, but also maybe not
yay
nah i dont think its that deep
but relativity can make it
if you're far enough and fast enough, you can probaby see big bang
but you had to be there before it happened
you'd have to go impossibly fast
yes
if you meet the ever-expanding universe
reach it
you probably could
but that would mean you'll have to go faster than light
Maybe a random deer in some forest anywhere in the world knows all the secrets of the universe in its random thoughts, but doesn't know that it does
Probability
not just faster than light, faster than expansion (which is faster than light)
still, faster than light
but absurdly faster
Throw some dark energy into your engine and go
give me some WORM HOLES!!
youre not wrong
Too bad nobody knows how dark energy even works
relativity is weird!
someone looking at our planet from the right distance can see ALLOSAURUS walking on it!
wormholes is less increasing speed and more decreasing distance (atleast how i understand it)
thats an insane thought
literally
imagine we discovery technology on that level
we could literally rehistorise history
you'd just have to be like 145 million lightyears away
Aliens wouldn't even see any life, nontheless intelligent, run around on that small planet of ours if they are far enough away
but still possible
not wrong
wormholes bend space time
best examples of it is the "folding a paper"
instead of going from A to B on the straight paper, you fold it in a way that A and B would be on top of each other
if we can truly make it possible
wormholes are real !
show me!!!
right, so it isnt speed, its nothing but shortening distance
And if they already visited at a time humans didn't view them as visitors from another planet, or didn't tell anyone (because why would they - think about it) they won't think to revisit us
theoretically
"oh, look at these monkeys holding tools. Wonder what they'll be like in a few thousand years!!"
Not that i believe in aliens deliberately trying to contact us or anything
More like "if our current understanding is reasonably correct, wormholes can possibly exist".
i want to meet an alien
we'll destroy ourselves before we even need aliens do to it lol
extraterrestrial life could exist, or it couldnt
the chance of it existing is higher than not
much higher
talked to an aussie astronomer recently
the general idea is that life likely exists
but in our radius? Likely not really any "human intelligence"
alien by definition is just weird and unknown, so you probably have already
I always think that if aliens exist and find us that they have super advanced technology etc but what if we are one of the first organims in the universe and we actually are the super advanced creatures going to visist other life forms in few thousand years
maybeeee
human intelligence as the benchmark for "intelligent lifeform" is very selfish of us
to find us
they'd innately have far superior tech to us
The observable part of the universe is so much smaller than the whole thing, and the ratio grows as time goes on
We might just be damned to be alone, and so might every other planetary civilization
Wormholes could be like "a googolplex of apples".
Conceivable, potentially possible but maybe not actually in existance.
its almost impossible even
its even theorised that the last unknown common ancestor had travelled to earth with an asteroid hitting the planet
still
the ability to construct is still impressive enough to be a small benchmark
so in theory, same ancestor hitting another planet, going through the same phases of extinction events as earth did, could possibly produce space dinosaurs 
almost impossible just means highly improbable
relatively!
Beavers cut down trees to build dams that hold water, protect them, are dry inside and act as homes
Would a lot of people categorize them as true intelligent life forms? Probably not
right, just like bees and many other insects build nests and hives
humans realize existence
most animals just exist
thats really the defining factor if you ask me
That's just arrogance though. Yes, you are more intelligent than a beaver, but it's not that much of qualitative difference.
That's like saying everything smaller than a truck is not a true car.
Bees and ants even have a whole SOCIETAL CONSTRUCT
And that works miles better than with humans (not that i advocate monarchy by birthright, but there we are at the other end of my argument)
sorry, I was being quite minimal.
Construct to control on a larger planetary and environmental level
a nice small benchmark
still impressive enough to be a small benchmark
other animals may realize existence as well, we just dont know it yet (or they may have not)
Humans are also smart enough to get space in the little heads of theirs to give themselves an identity crisis with a long talk about existance
dolphins!!!
dolphins fit within most intelligence categories (including having the ability to be evil)
not the way we do because they're physically incapable of
at least the majority
some animals pass the mirror test, which means they're self aware, but none can understand the existence the way we do
Human intelligence is so much more impressive in part because of a bunch of gamechangers that supercharged it:
- culture
- tool use
- writing
thank the apes for holding and making tools!
it truly just makes me wonder why were here and maybe there will never be an answer but if there is, whats the point, like why, live your life to fullest and be happy, but like why?
"physically incapable to understand the way we do" does not necessarily mean "physically incapable to understand"
Also a very high level of coorperation, because you can't hoard knowledge as we do if nobody cares.
the exchange of information
We did develop them and we learned from others
we developed better then others learned from us
Includes, but isn't limited to:
- preparing food for more use than pure survival
- attack other same species civilization for no reason other than thinking they are subhuman for not having the same ideals
I wonder if without the vast knowledge at our disposal human intelligence would actually look that impressive compared to other animals.
bugs, many bugs act like those two (except the subhuman and ideals part) (they're bugs they arent human)
racism aint limited to humans
same with storing food
ant wars!!
eeehhh
its tricky because you're, by nature, are designed to not think about death cause it might stress you
humans freely think about it and even created ways to cope with it
like afterlife
and death is part of existence
at least the way we know it
You think about death, because what comes after actually does concern you.
They might attack another hive of their own species for taking food, threatening their colony or invading territory
Never heard of a fight for no good reason, can you tell me a bit about it because i'd be interested to learn new stuff
we have no survival meaning, no physical threat
what's worse than the thing that kills? The thing after that
"designed not to think about death" i aint never heard that before
all living beings are designed to avoid death yes, but not thinking about it?
im pretty sure ive read papers that said a part of human brain purposefully works to not remind you of death, because it'd stress you
but it was long time ago and credibility is up for debate
Other animals probably also think about death, especially the cultural ones. Elephants come to mind.
I heard of animals committing suicide because of bad environment (like dolphins in captivity)
So yes, some do think about life and death in a way
Anyways gonna be back in around 7 minutes, got something to do rq
i believe doubt's more so referring to the idea of the eternal end that is death, as a philosophical debate of existence and not existence
and not the survival aspect of death
many species of ants will kill other ants (even of same species) if they are from a different hive, just because.
yes
ah
Oh that... yeah nobody else has time for that.
no point, doesn't help in survival
It helps humans, because humans use that to further cooperation.
i am so lucky i get to exist
and now im going to use this luck to kill Fatalis again
humans have basically conquered the act of survival
maybe not truly above but yes
to think and ponder about the afterlife?
Nature laughs at those pitiful claims.
Yeah, it works, but so did growing really big for Sauropods.
what are the odds of us evolving to become physically weaker and have no toes
humans have not conquered weather nor temperature
"im above nature!"
bold claim considering your entire planet and life in it depends on whether or not Sun is going to unleash a solar flame today
Sun
please dont
i mean we could
evolution is wacky. Who knows how it works purely
toes are useful for balance, toes probably wouldnt go away, physically weaker has a high chance since physical power isnt in high demand in current modern society
id argue we've conquered small scale temperature, its relatively easy to control our immediate enviorment
2025 foreshadowing moment
Humans depend so much on the ecosystems around us.
That's why we do preservation, not because we think Polar bears are cute.
not for our environment though 
poor earth having to deal with the climate; getting to deal with us for a tiny bit
rip the homie earth
we've controlled it small scale, we havent conquered it
she's still strong 💪 we're just a small speck
a tiny nuisance
cute privilege absolutely has a part in it
its survived worse (the species on the planet? not so much)
It helps with mobilizing people, the purpose is still survival though.
Earth will have no problem even if the blow up our nukes
^
hasn't really helped mobilise the fat old people who run our systems though 
Survival does though, at least for some.
greed is the truest deadly sin
i hate being an adult due to such
worst thing to happen. Much prefer having a parent to force me away from crap
Cut those fat old people some slack, because politics is really difficult and you don't actually have that much room to do stuff while also staying in the place where you can do it.
wrath, envy, lust, gluttony, pride and sloth got nothing on my boy greed
If the people who only care for their own needs and bend the system to their will take power, society goes into nowhere
Too bad almost only these people want the power, and then get it with a lot of empty promises and appealing to peoples fears
That's why so many politicians seem so inept - they are busy doing politics.
because the old fat people of their age were doing the same
modern politics is more about charisma than wisdom and intelligence
Politics is hard, i know, but focus on useful things that will bring everyone forward a bit, and not only you a lot
Yeah, it's the system. It's a bit better in democratic systems, but still not easy.
Charisma, big words and selfishness
being in a family that has many political ties to many layers of the government
you hear crap
You realise everyone there are flawed (surprise
)
but power likes to take people by the hand
like what do most modern leaders have in common:
wisdom? (a little but not really)
intelligence? (^)
ideals? (a ton but not the same)
charisma? (the most)
Democracy is hard too because (taking representative democracy here, not direct) politicians still influence people and might make them radical and politically conservative through telling them things to fear fear
democracy means the one who controls the people controls the world
dictatorship means the one who controls the world controls the world
It always was about charisma and intelligence and it still is. Charisma might be a bit more important now, because of mass media but you can manipulate that with intelligence, too.
And the people with high intelligence and decent values, but no charisma gets laughed at
Pretty privilege (or pretty word privilege) is real and people only want to think their world is perfect as it is
yeah, but if you cant make the people vote for you it dont matter how smart you are
Manipulation with intelligence is way rarer than through charisma in my opinion
2+2=4
No! 2+2=5
No. Here's why:
...
nah! I believe it's still 5
the orange man is a very good representation of control through charisma
It depends on the specific system, too.
In personal elections like the US charisma matters a lot more, in party based ones like Germany less so.
2 + 2 = 6 because you have 2 2's so you have to account for the extra two
or in Australia
vote whomever because we barely know what's happening. We're puppets anyways
yeah, true that
For germany, a lot is emotion based "here is an enemy you need to fear, vote us to be safe from it"
Prominent example the far right, extremist party AFD
a discussion going from death, to gods, to time, to death again, and then to politics (and many more in between) is a very nice thing
AFD is doing very US-like politics though. They are basically copying the Republicans and silently drop the parts that don't apply to Germany.
I love that kind of discussion for real
lol
"here is an enemy you need to fear, vote us to be safe from it"
sounds very similar to something that happened around 90-80 years ago
Similar thing, similar reasons, too.
Protests against AFD are literally happening because they are too similar
to be fair, thats just how all politics go nowadays
im not a centrist at all, cause thats stupid. but most of the time, nuance has completely been forgotten. the whole mindset has shifted to them vs us
Keep in mind back then people didn't expect it do be "that serious" until it was too late.
idk where i am on the political spectrum, i just mean what i mean and thats it
i think my views are definitely rather far left
im far left due to my country being far left, other than that idk
I'm for politics that work by the people, through the people, for the people
So basically a well structured democracy without selfishness and corruption
Accepting all beliefs, because that's how democracy works
Or at least should work
yeah but selfishness and corruption is very difficult to get rid of
That's what makes it powerful.
If you have "mob democracy" where only a few people do the thinking you are just as bad as an oligarchy.
Because it might be a deeply human thing, to achieve one's own goals first
Everyone is selfish in a way
all beliefs is very broad, two beliefs that contradict eachother wouldnt fare as well as two that dont
selfishness is super useful for your own survival
We cannot get rid of it, my description was an ideal situation that can never happen
right, perfection is impossible
That's why it exists in the first place, and it was good when we needed it
i'd say
I'd be quite "centrist" for the "modern westerner"
my ideals are quite mixed from left and right
selfishness is only "bad" because its "bad" against other people
Contradicting beliefs are actually very interesting and warrant closer inspection.
Because it often comes down to
- it doesn't actually matter, do your thing
- one of them is just wrong
- its a coordination problem that needs to be solved
in my country i'd say im more "centrist" yeah, but compared to like USA and stuff im "far left"
which country?
id argue the only 'right' view i have is having a smaller government reach over us (but thats not entirely right because they seem to like when the government has rights over your body and how you dress in public)
In a dictatorship it often ends with "that belief is wrong by definition" and in most cases it ends up very poorly.
oh lol
I might generally be more on the left side of things
But it doesn't matter to me because my beliefs are mine, nobody will change them without a lengthy, fair discussion and neither will i try to force my thoughts upon anyone of a different stance
exactly, what you mean is what you mean even if others mean something different
Depends, if it's actually a coordination thing you might want some government oversight.
I'm one who talks things out
Violence is unnecessary if the other person doesn't get aggressive
political and religious discussion for the last 3 hours
id rather the government moreso stays out of our personal choices, i should have worded that better. i dont want the government telling me what religion to follow, which religion is right, what medical decisions i can do with my body, who i can date, etc
I am surprised the moderators haven’t said no
im guessing since its offtopic they a) havent really checked here or b) dont see much harm in it as long as its not becoming hateful
Your personal choices usually don't fall under "needs coordination" though.
Let's keep going then
Before they nuke us
i mean we (me, isaac and another dude) did start with death and gods and all that
they dont, but they continuely intervene in things they dont need to. (im from the USA, so most of my experience with politics and government come from my experiences here)
Unless your personaly choice is something like "I go at red and halt at green".
right
the way y’all be tagging at me 🥱🥱🥱😤😤😤🦎🦎🦎🇱🇷🇱🇷🇱🇷
That's not a personal choice then, but breaking an agreed upon rule that might endanger yourself or others
i love the flag of liberia
Personal choices, like choice of clothing, religion (as long as you don't harm others through it), lifestyle (same as with religion) and so on shouldn't be universally controlled by a government
any ideal, lifestyle and choice, shouldnt be limited by a government (unless they are actively endangering other people)
That's what i said but less overcomplicated
Nice
This conversation took more turns than a road covering every inch of australia
erm
pretty much
we (the USA) were doing pretty well before the 2016 adminstration, and now we're taking many steps back with more steps already planned (project 2025)
we have VERY good roads thank you very much!
georgia used to be known for having pretty amazing roads
now they SUCK
RAR
built your infrastructure to PUBLIC TRANSPORTS AND NOT MEGAHIGHWAYS!!
CHINA ALREADY PROVED THE MORE ROADS ON A HIGHWAY DOESN"T SOLVE A PROBLEM!!!!
I WISH
public transportation outside of the major cities is almost non existent. would you believe i didnt see a public bus until i was 12
oh wow lol
sad to hear (coming from someone who takes the bus like almost every day)
it's hard to imagine that
as a euro dude who lived most his life in Australia
even sidewalks are pretty rare if you arent in a neighborhood or near some buisnesses
i hear they just stop
THEY DO LOL
lol
a sidewalk that just stops is weird to imagine for me
does australia have HOA's
HQAs?
homeowner associations
As a european person too
Some roads are really nice, and a lot of remote ones have more holes than a good swiss cheese
basically clubs for neighborhoods that decide what you can do with your house lmfao
sounds totalitarian
That is such a mental concept in my opinion
no
but we used to have neighbourhood watches
nothing to the extent of proper homeowner assocations
its supposedly to keep property value's up but usually its just "your grass is too high" "you cant have that pool in your front yard" "the christmas decorations arent the correct color"
People being people
Stupidity
not that i have to deal with it, i live in government housing. the worst thing we have to worry about is keeping our grill on our back porch
HOA leaders are stereotypical karens. infact i believe some of the first karens that went viral were HOA leaders
to keep property value's up
aint the US got a problem with property becoming too expensive, why'd they want it even more expensive
Seems weird, but there are some reasons.
There are legit coordination issues you can solve there and it also seems to be a safety measure.
But as far as I heard most far overreach and end up like Isle community servers with byzantine rules.
yes! its called gentrification
rich people upgrade lower class neighborhoods, introduce more buisnesses, raise the property value and taxes, and run out the poor people
Because
✨Capitalistic profit greed✨
search up Redfern if you wanna learn about some aussie gentrification lol
when i was younger, my grandpa used to shoot his gun into the woods every now and then to hopefully keep the property value down via keeping the rich people out
but he lived in a normal neighborhood built for those in lower/middle class so he was just being crazy
Capitalism gets a bad rep, when it's not even capitalism but corporatism.
For example the concept of "too big to fail" is antithetic to capitalism.
american solution to american problem
Though capitalism does indeed rather horribly when cooperation/coordination is needed.
Fair capitalism is a fair market, not helping out the biggest corporations and suppressing small ones and people
fair market
stinky people
Couldnt have said it better myself
i follow this one person on tiktok who runs her buisness in more of a socialist model. unlimited PTO, everyone gets paid the exact same depending on profit that year, incredible healthcare, etc
of course pure socialism isnt the solution but god, it seems nice
Production and trade for example are areas where capitalism could shine (but tends to degenerate into corporatism over time) while infrastructure is just not a match at all.
Yeah
And it correlates with better productivity and employee happiness too!
They are way less likely to exploit the benefits of her business unlike with gigantic corporations that don't care about the state of their workers because they don't get exploited back
From the systems we have seen so far social democracy seems to work best, but it's also very vulnerable to liberalization.
economy aint my forté so i'm probably not gonna be as active in this discussion
granted, she only has about 8-12 workers including herself but they all have about a 60-70k salary
her buisness is a fashion buisness iirc
Means it's inherently unstable as soon as we forget why we spend all that money on other people.
its not mine either. im more into the human rights part of politics because of my identity and things of that nature
ronald reagan you will RUE THE DAY!!!
(he convinced poor people to pay more taxes and that it was okay for the rich people to pay less LOL)
Liberalization.
politics as a whole as well for me, like i know its important and some things need change, but how to make that change happen i have no clue
It's cheaper.
elon musk would have paid 70% in taxes prior to reagan

(For the rich and the government)
It always depends on what is good for 'the people' and what is good for 'the corporation'
And because corporation controls it will always choose itself
go back to tribal!
Strongest lead group. We strong. We happy.
elongated muskox would not like that
Elon Musk doing the good work of showing everyone why neoliberalism is wrong and the rich aren't, in fact, smarter with the way they spend resources.
i have to know
no
sinful
missed opportunity
If there is dispute
Argue first
If no agreement
Fight over it
UK wasn't involved
So we don't learn 
might makes right
the american in me is always baffled at the idea of different countries having different history courses.
like does the average australian even know who lewis and clark is
like it makes sense ofc, but its still a reality check
we learn about american history
but we don't really go into niches
Very unlikely the strongest actually lead tribal groups.
Chimps are recorded to get rid of tyrants.
(obligatory not average australian) i have heard the names Lewis and Clark but i aint got a clue who
sounds like anti-tribal propaganda
we learn abit about australian history here too, but not much.
i think the furthest we got into it was the british stealing the land (per usual) and turning it into a prison island
European here
We of course got the history of our own countries, but also others and the most important thing, different viewpoints from different countries and how the world is connected
No... being lead by the strongest would suck.
more lies!!
Tribal, but elect our leader every once in a while
tldr; they were some of the first americans to go out west and map out the western part of the USA. they met a native girl (cant remember her name) who helped them quite a bit. they also ate their dogs
i mean yeah, the average american probably doesnt know who my man Harald Fairhair is
absolutely no clue
Well then folks, i need to leave
cya
As far as I know elections weren't all that uncommon in tribal societies.
Was fun here sitting for 2+ hours
hmm
i want to say her name was sequoia but thats also a type of redwood tree so uhhh
nvm it was Sacagawea
Mind you, that's "hey lets figure out who would be boss, what's your opinion" and not "let me secretly make an X on a piece of paper".
yeah
naturally the U.S history also massively favors the USA and its allies during lessons about WW1 and WW2, almost trying to justify alot of what they did
infact they completely left out the fact the USA was sending weapons and helping out the UK in WW2 and made it seem like Japan was just being crazy for the attack on pearl harbor
granted, WW2 japan was kind of insane but i dont think that was really the most insane thing they did
nuance was never really taught to us in history. there was 'good' and 'bad'. im guessing its an old relic from the times of the cold war where people were taught to hate communists lol
most countries massively favor their own countries actions in history
which makes sense but GOD
nationalism is good for getting people power
its like every country thinks its immune to propaganda and then on the flip side, says every country that their country has taught them to hate is riddled with propaganda and blah blah blah
oh 1900's humanity you will RUE THE DAY
"favours" is a light world 
thank god i spelled it like favors 

but i do like how america hates america until someone outside of it hates america and then the INNER PATRIOTISM comes gushing out
yeah we suck but ONLY WE CAN SAY WE SUCK RAHHHHH 🦅 🦅 🇺🇸
"im immune to propaganda, thats why i know [insert country/people] are bad"
genuinely how half the USA views china
Ah i hate America!!1 it sucks!!1
“Yeah i agree!!”
NO1!1! ITS THE BEST!1!!1
completely ignoring the fact the CIA was BUILT to push out anti-communism/anti-russia propaganda and now does the same to china
DULCE ET DECORUM EST PRO PATRIA MORI 🦅 🦅
omg
you reminded me
that im learning valyrian
from game of thrones (im based)
lol
i mean i can get behind that, me insulting myself is different from someone else insulting me
real
Fallout show is good
Watch it
I haven’t played fallout, should I still watch it
I dont see why not
It definitely helps to understand what things are, but I don't think it's necessary
What is this
Giant stick insect
I couldn’t tell if it was a glitch or a ai
It’s a bugged compy lol
Ohhh
Why do I feel like I was in this picture
the internet is no heavier than a tennis ball
Crocodile pfp!!!



It is you 🙂
Har har har har har
On EU2?
Yeah I was Spelkz
HAHA! That’s crazy!
Where am I
But I mean. That control 🤌🏻
If you missed @sfballet Swan Lake this run, it’s coming back April 30-May 5.
book an appointment!
-SAN FRANCISCO
www.thepointeshop.com/pages/san-francisco-showroom-appointments
-OAKLAND
www.thepointeshop.com/pages/oakland-showroom-appointment
-SANTA ANA
www.thepointeshop.com/pages/orange-county-showroom-appointment...
Swan: stretching*
people: omg its a ballerina!
I have something important to share with chat 
Daaaaaaaaaaamm
I love when my wifi card randomly dies in my laptop I love it so much I love having to order a new one I love it I love it I love it
I love having no laptop for a few days during the week when I have college yippee!
This has made my day
I no longer require a laptop
What is your favourite pc game guys
Isle
The one that doesn't exist that I want
Deep Rock Galactic, Monster Hunter World, Red Dead Redemption 2
yours'?
Escape from tarkov and valorant
oh Awesome! 😊
I played some HH too for aw hile, but it's not quite for me >.<
It's a really cool weapon though
It's really great for knockdowns and bonking
I love it
I played it for a bit, more than I thought actually o:
But my issue is the music playing >.< I never really got into it
I've been considering giving it a try in Mh:Rise again
I need mh:Wilds >.<
WARNING: FRESHLY GROOMED BABY!
woah you played it a lot
i dont have nearly as much xD
I don't even remember it xD
ALso, I'm in so much mental pain right now
oh im sorry to hear that
hope you feel better soon
I just found out Elden Ring has an option, that lets you switch to Keyboard & Mouse Keys to be displayed in game
oh xD Nothing serious like that
But I spent like 230 hours Guessing buttons for this game xD because they showed as Controller stuff
lmfao
at least its over
imma play Elden Ring one day
idk when
Yeah xD It's just...I wish I had known earlier
It's a cool game 😊 I'm planning on playing through it again with a new character, since the DLC is coming out soon
I still haven't beat elden ring :3
ooh
people have been loving Dragon's Dogma too, despite the microtransactions drama
though i dont have the system to play that
A lot of the drama is from people who haven't actually played it, as I've seen
Get the first one, gameplay wise it's not much different, still very good for its age
I hated the Companion system in Dragons Dogma 1 >.<
But it's been many years
a close friend of mine played it
he worships the game basically
I'm half-interested in 2, I might take a look when it's in a sale someday
I, couldn't get into itz I liked itz it deserves praise just not for me
i just hope microtransactios stay at MHW level for MH Wilds
That's fair, yeah ):
The Microtransactions are frustrating, even if the times are not a super important, and I think it's fair to complain about it.
But overall I don't think they make the game unfun.
I get for many people it's a Principles thing, since it's just a very reaccuring bad taste from big companies.
But yeah >.<
Weird how it’s still called “micro” transactions when some games have 50 dollar DLCs
I think the main issue I had with DD2, was the whole "One save that you can't delete" thing.
Which was made worse with the whole system banning people from the game when they deleted their save-games too often in their files.
Just from what I heard, I haven't been following this at all! >.<
The only thing, I can really say about either game
Os keep female characters away from the trolls
Or stuff like Stellaris ):
You get a game for 40€, but ...

( still amazing game of course, just something that always scares me away >.< )
Yeah
im ok for some hairstyles being paid
is it really a necessity for a AAA game? thats up for debate
just wanting things to stay at cosmetics and "character edit voucher" level
Yeah, same >.<
Overwatch had horrible microtransactions but it’s somewhat fixed now with earning premium currency for free being a thing now, and mythic skins no longer being fomo. But most fps games nowadays are free to play but if you want anything in it you better be ready to pay 20 dollars for each item!
meh ):
I think that's a very controversial opinion, but I dislike stuff like that more than a (well done at least) gacha system
Teo appreciation post
love his theme
Don't
Make me think about how much money I've spent
I can't wait for Mh: wilds >.<
Same
fomo is the bread and butter of those so called "free to play" games

Yeah that’s why I’m so happy it’s no more in ow2
with both War Thunder and Apex Legends, i stood awake countless nights just to get those sweet sweet rewards before time ran out
hmm
I just bought jwe2 
The apex grind to get something free is ugh hard…
I haven't played too many free to play games like that to be honest >.<
THEN THEY INTRODUCED THE SAME THING BACK 2 YEARS LATER
I keep considering getting it, but I'm not sure >.<
You just missed a huge sale for all frontier games
i havent for a long time
last time i played Newcastle was "new"
I got the deluxe edition for 17$
Nice! I recently got planet zoo
its surprisingly fun
That's okay, I don't mind waiting until the next one!
Oh ok
i didnt know i liked tycoon games before i gave JWE2 a try
turns out managing a park is fun
at least in a game
Same actually or I liked them but not that much
I should play Prehsitoric Kingdom again, I haven't taken a look in over a year
It’s way better now
The last time I played apex legends consistently was when they released valkyrie
I’m a filthy valk main…
i hve PK but im waiting for the proper release
i tried it like a year and a half ago, performance was... yeah
dude i bought her armor with Viper's helmet so fast its not a joke
The only free to play games I put soooo much time into is Fortnite and valorant
I don't play Fortnite anymore though

this was a bait for all Titanfall fans
and it worked
It sure did
I played Fortnite when they brought back the OG map in like December
Mmmm cheese
The only free game I play like that is Star Rail 
Which, in my opinion, has a pretty good monatization system (especially for a gacha game)
I’m still mad all the updating tf2 and stuff wasn’t hinting at tf3..
I like playing games with ranked modes like valorant or apex or fortnite
grow up
we all had that phase in our lives
you'll grow out of it
Why
I am ngl hoyoverse has pretty ok monetization for Gacha games
5000 hours
Some od my friends still play apex

once you hit a certain point, you dont get fun from dunking on people anymore
it feels stale
Oh
19 yo me would dig that still
The only game I still play ranked in is valorant
I've been playing it since the beta back in 2020
I have like 3K hours
(and I still suck)

Todays meal..
Only competitive game I permit, is Minecraft hunger games
the only competitive game i play nowadays is War Thunder
i have like another 3000 hours in that
i gave in for coop
My highest rank in valorant was diamond
but im playing War Thunder since 2013
Oh ok
jesus its 11 years
Leaking government info since 2013 

my relationship with war thunder is older than some people
Ha
Old
They do, yeah! 
Though that isn't much of a competition >.< there's so many predatory games like that around.
black ops 2 lobbies
the pit of human misery
Hopefully this years black ops game will be good
you'd get sued today the moment you ushered anything from that era
Black ops gulf war
Mhm
the toxicity
sheesh
but that was the fun part
back in the day at least
now everyone get offended too easily
I had a weird League phase for 2 years or so o:
we're at a point where "ill tear your limbs" can be taken more seriously on internet than face to face
never played league
love Arcane though
I was in the top like 40K players on the global leaderboard at one point but then stopped playing 
But I never saw too much toxicity actually o:
Maybe because I played with friends, and nobody of us took it super serious
Arcano
shush now
Which isn't that high but I think it's better than being in the top 1 million
I didn't watch Arcane ):

You should! A new season is coming out this year
hello? 911? yes thats her. send everything
D:
I can't wait for this years call of duty
CoD have been ballin since 2019
Same as the last
There's going to be a beta in August I think
I never played any CoD o:
The black ops games are good I think
Leonardo what happened
The modern warfares are kind mid
i guess its normal?
it was more of a boys thing
so dont worry
Rehab was supposed to be a fresh start
i started shooters with CS 1.5 at the age of 8
I'm going to grind the leaderboards once the new cod is out. I've always wanted to be placed really high on a leaderboard of a game I enjoy playing 
i wish i still had that spirit
Halo was my first introduction to shooters probably
i cant be bothered by sweating for some reason
i think im broken
you should never give up ideally
oh actually! o:
I played Borderlands, that's a Shooter, though not one like CS or CoD
like back in the day, id be STEAMING if some dude kept killing me in The Isle deathmatch map
now i let them bite my ass as i watch it with dead eyes
like "whatever"
i hereby congratulate you for being a part of Borderlands
based game series
I loved playin Maya
one of my friends still have her as pfp since Borderlands 2 came out
aw xD
that man never changed
this was a comeback attempt to BL2, ruined by goofiness
Yeah >.< same

Isn't a positive Kill/death ratio good ?
I used to wake up early in the morning practicing nade lineups for each "meta" map in CS
It is
Cringe
Anyways I’ll enjoy my meal now
have fun
I’ll have fun with the food thanks
you cringe 😤
Nuh uh
Enjoy your food 😊
I only played like 3 maps on cs
Dust 2, mirage, and inferno
I don't know any of the other maps
Vertigo was so underrated
I played vertigo and underpass quite a bit aswell
i was planning to join a team because i was getting invites but then collage happened
Really those are the only maps I ever played
Until the closed beta thing for cs2 started and it forced you to play other maps
i havent played cs in over a year i think
last time i played i joined to maybe drop the new case for money lmao
but i stopped pplaying it seriously back in 2022
My highschool had Esports and one of the games you can sign up for was valorant
I wanted to sign up but I didnt
Idk why
we all start small
wish you did sign up
I really wanted to play valorant and like compete with other schools
We had like tournaments and stuff against other schools
Not just valorant but also r6 siege and rocket leagie
League*
siege was cringe back in the day
shoot someone through bulletholes simulator
That sounds cool o:
I'm not much for competitive games >.< so that wouldn't be something for me
but my dumb ass still played it for so long
probably for the best lmao
its so energy draining
I did FF14 PvP, if that counts xD
idk how that works but cant be good
Aw xD It's a very niche thing in FF14
Somehow this made me think of Warden ): Did anyone of you play "For Honor" ?
i have it but never got into it
Warden loves it
I played it a lot with my friend on ps4
Mostly during covid
And everyone wasn't allowed to go outside
I have I think around 400 hours on ps4 and 130 on pc
Last time I played siege was during the season where they added that Tom Clancy guy to the game
thats a lot for that game lmao
to play that thing for more than 50 hours, you either hve to be good or bad enough to not care about how you play
At least you got into it now 😊 It's a fun game
last time i played they added that lady with a scar on her face
with laser fences and stuff
war thunder normal hours in like 1k plus
lol
Im at like 3.5 with .5 mostly being afk
I still don't have hours in any game on steam past 2k
Maybe if you count cumulative hours of minecryand terraria prior to getting a pc
My highest playtime on any game on steam is the isle
Maintenance day go brrrrrr
You should get that checked out my a professional
real, same for me
i said i have 3000 but apparently i lied
i have 2400 on steam alone
and i started to play it on steam in 2018
i played on launcher between 2013-2018
Atleast I think it is
I have I think 3 to 4 games on steam over 2k hours, but they are prob my top all time faves as well
Dang
steam is doo doo atm
I don't think I have any game that's over 450 hours other than the isle
My second most played is 1200 hours in Skyrim xD
On steam
My most played games on steam are beasts of Bermuda and ark
Mhw is nearing the 1000 hour mark
my most played top 3 is unironically the 3 games on my list that i wouldnt recommend to others
CS
War Thunder
The Isle
I dont even play the isle that much but Ima huge gamer, spend most of my free time gaming, I already have 160 hours in the isle and its no where near my fave games
does that mean i like torturing myself
Have like no afk time in the isle either
hm, I was about to say it's hard to AFK in the isle anyway, but I guess some people do AFK grow o:
It loaded for me D:
i afk grew in legacy
i aint walking around with a 90% sub giga
that thing is just dead on sight to anything
It's an MMO to be fair, easy to get many hours xD
hey we have the same font
And I'm the person with the least hours from my friends

I didn't know you could change the font o:
Most played steam games
font as in the colours
mb!
really really were
I bought dayz a few years ago but I hardly play it
I'm pretty sure I got it right around when the Standalone Game "released"
I usually just run around pick up a knife then get bored and leave lol
lol
Gotta get a gun and food and explore way up north
and find the right server, prob the trickiest part
(i have another 700 on Apex at Origin)
uhhh
i dont believe in mains!
play the most?
I never heard of Insurgency before o:
or fave
i play USA, USSR, Germany and Sweden
I only play Japan France and USA
Aww xD
(mostly public lobbies)
the cutest nations
(I don't have enough friends to play among us with so I played in public lobbies)
(don't play in public lobbies)
sweden is close 4th
Cutest and USA
hmmmmmmmmm

i have the whole USA and USSR aviation trees
tanks, i dont have much tech tree USSR ones but i got Moderna etc
USA tanks is at Abrams
Germany is fully spaded on land
Sweden tanks is at 9.0 i think
I think I have like 2000 hours on fortnite
Or something
aw xD
actually i take that back, i think i dont hve Leopard 2A7 yet
I can't wait for GTA 6 
i dont have a console nor a pc that could handle GTA6 so im not interested
I only have USA to like 5.7 on ground and 3.7 air France I own the jagaur E but at like 7.7 air, also for ground have the AMX-30 Super but am at its br at 9.7 with no backups.
Japan is 98% researched because new things keep coming out, but air fully done, ground is the 2% not done
maybe ill play before i die
Even have my top tier heli for japan
F15AJ is really good
you mean AAM-3 missiles are good 🎌
japan made missile
the thrust of F15 is out of this world actually but yeah
Why do I get like pubg vibes from that
what about other nations f-15s?
I never really got the appeal of GTA o:
Is it the Story ?
Because what else do you do ? o: Drive around ?
not super informed on the top tier jets meta even tho f-15 has my best kill ratio
by far
.....drive a car on the beach and kill innocents

hm xD
they're all solid
deinitely the most suited aircraft for air rb at top tier, besides Grippen but thats just op
but the thing is that its kit is subpar
It's ok because the beaches in GTA 5 were empty
Story
GTA4's story will break you
I usually just use cheat codes and fight the entire military for 2 hours
That's fair xD
I have issues locking a grippen while its flaring much more often then other jets, even with aam-3, so yeah that things airframe just works I guess
I think soon they're making older games run on a ps5 like GTA 4 and black ops 1
your periodic flare deployment when my AIM-9M:
9M do not care about it unless you spam flares
Gta4s story takes like 100 hours to complete I think
which makes it the best orbital strike missile
hence those 6 kills people getting with Grippen deez nuts
you can mistakenly flare an R73 but you cant do taht to a 9M
Nah nah same thing with aam-3, it will always hit with hard heat lock, but only the grippen effects that, flares just work with its airframe better is my thought
its airframe hides its engines heat better is what i think
its the deployment of flares as well
they drop right behind the engine on grippen
next best drop pattern belong to russians
USA drop pattern is like the worst
Very useful to know lol
japan drop pattern in my experience is decent
but I dont get flares till like top tier
you mean american xD
unless thats different
Was just saying how I feel about japans flare pattern
no no
i mean
do they drop different from american counterparts?
genuienly curious
cause if so, its bad
though if you got by, thats like fine
japan does make a lot of changes to imported aircraft
mhm
I'd have to haver experience in the american top tier aircraft, i only have the a4-b squadron jet
Su27 is just different though
i played all major top tier aircraft, its that stupid kit that just works
which is super fun btw imo
