#should i install arch on flash drive?
35 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
I don’t see any reason why not? except maybe to install directly on the portable SSD instead
main thing to know is that a USB drive as a root is liable to slow down dramatically once you’ve used it enough
i dont have ssd thats why
i mean i have, but theres another distro on it and its all complicated to install
grub on another ssd, distro on another ssd and etc
problems
im not gonna daily drive it, and i never did write on that. Its brand new so fr why not?
im not gonna do play some games, edit and etc
im just gonna use it as rescue and not home(some times) like using on my uncles laptop
if it’s on a removable USB the motherboard may not be happy with GRUB trying to install itself as a permanent bootloader
the best thing is for it to use the fallback mechanism – I’m not sure how you can make GRUB do that, but that means to put the bootloader at \EFI\BOOTX64\BOOTX64.EFI and tell the computer to just boot the USB drive
but since we’re doing Arch anyway you might as well try something different
try Limine, and configure it manually – just read the documentation for usage and configuration and you can figure it out
i tried to just boot my laptop without usb
and grub works
can i just boot arch inside another grub
from grub basic bash console
that could work, or you could add a manual boot entry for the Arch USB in the other GRUB
I don't see the issue of installing Arch on a flash drive.
I installed Arch on a USB.
It is slow because the laptop where I installed it had only 8 GB of RAM and because the USB was slow.
Nothing else than that.
but sandisk ultra flair is one of most fastest sandisk flash drives
so i dont think thats the problem
could work os-prober?
I’m not familiar with os-prober
I haven’t seen it behave correctly or autodetect other Linux systems, so I can’t be sure
on my main distro(arch-based one) everything works great
it detect my windows 10 disk
im newbie in grub