#1984 enforcement of "no memes in #linux"
335 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
allow memes in linux post #84728
Dang it I reacted with the AMD arrow
I can't remove it on mobile
It only shows the first two reactions

This is canonically a reddit upvote
lol
New emoji just dripped
they're allowed when it's an example of something, usually a technical example, which is very very rare, but does happen, you've been in the server for a very long time, and should know this by now.
its amd now
#tech-general is an on-topic discussion channel. If you want to Shitpost, we have a dedicated channel for shitposting.in #urandom . #tech-general is the single on-topic discussion channel in this server directly related to the topic of the server itself. As a result, we expect at least some level of quality in that channel.
If you don't like not being allowed to post memes in a channel, you can simply hide the channel and not use it.
I do think if its relevant and isn't just spam it should be allowed
Otherwise it just turns into a giant wall of text
Just my opinion btw
It shouldnt warrant an outright ban lmao
the ban was already handled by Astrid and the user was unbanned
People aren't asking for it to be a dedicated shitpostfest, but to let people breathe a lil in regards to memes. Not for hundreds of absurd GIFs to be allowed
#tech-general feels like an IRC channel
From a non moderator, user standpoint, I still say that memes should be allowed to an extent
Or a better option, IMO is to rename off topic to general and move it above Linux, and allow memes there
From what I've seen, most Linux servers do this and the chat ends up on the topic of Linux anyway
And you can repurpose Linux as quick questions thereby removing an extra channel
It's a win win.
we've tried "general" before, no-one knew if it was off topic or on topic, which is why we have linux and off topic
we've also had people say to rename linux to general, and people say to rename off topic to general, which, kinda shows why it's a confusing idea, everyone has their own ideas over what a general channel is
Maybe just tell mods to relax a bit with enforcement, and have an unspoken rule that memes/gifs are fine as long as they contribute to the conversation
is it really that hard to post memes in #urandom?
No
But posting a meme in urandom is pointless if the convo its relevant to is in #tech-general
Most of the memes in urandom are completely unrelated to any conversation, and in that case that's where they belong
and is it really that hard to just follow the rules and not post memes
The rules are dumb (in my opinion)
That meme would be totally out of context in #urandom
totally fine that you have an opinion, and you express it here, I don't agree with you, I think memes often contribute in a negative way to the conversation
yeah talking about 1984 in that context doesn't look at all on topic for #tech-general in the first place
I mean even if you think that memes in Linux should be allowed, the rule is still in place and you still need to follow it
In the convo at the time it made perfect sense
A mod had just taken action against someone for posting a relevant meme, and I was comparing it to 1984
nope, if you have a problem with moderation, either #1006744879583461418 or a ticket
... tickets
#12073 📣 To report issues privately to the moderation team, use tickets.
To open a ticket, use the command /tickets open. This will open a private channel where you can talk to the moderators.
You can add other users to the ticket by using the command /tickets adduser in that channel.
When you're done talking to the moderation team, use the command /tickets close in your ticket's channel. This will archive all the messages sent in the ticket and delete the channel.
not "lets derail #tech-general because I disagree with a rule"
Well that's why I made this thread
which as I said is fine, but you made the example of posting that above meme as being relevant because a moderator took action
Oh cmon its not "derailing" linux
making linux into a "lets debate moderator actions" channel is 100% derailing it
either you're passing noisey commentary that doesn't add anything beyond you being noisey, or, you're trying to debate the mods when they moderate the server
if you act with a little maturity by expressing issues you feel do warrant a conversation by communicating clearly in a thread here or a ticket, that's very different
If your just going to insult me I'm not going to talk to you
I mean, I'm giving you very clear feedback, posting such gifs is just noisey, as well as off topic, and such behaviour is immature, do what you like, I stand by what I said fully.
How long ago was that experiment?
I think 2021? @rich mason might know? (Ref: question of when Linux was renamed to general)
Isn't that almost 3 years ago now.
I am sure stuff has changed and it's worth another test drive
It reminds me of that one quote I read where they said that just because older ideas failed does not mean we shouldn't try them again
But as above, people want to call Linux general, and they want to call Off-topic general, so what is general meant to be? There’s a lack of consensus and it creates confusion, what would be the thing to differentiate it for random users joining?
I think we can probably run a poll to decide that?
I think the community has a right to decide this
Not sure how that would help a random user joining to know what the community previously decided
IMO,
Off topic should be general and allow Linux conversation, as I said Linux can be reuprosed to quick questions
So the user doesn't have to decide, both channels work
So no on topic but not support related channel?
Personally the idea of no on topic Linux channel outside of a support based one seems like a terrible idea to me, and a lot of the suggestions around these topics to me looks like change for the sake of change, with obvious negative repercussions.
I also don’t think that leaving the rules up to the community is a good idea, mainly because everyone has their own opinions and I think it’d likely become a popularity contest rather than a what is a good idea contest.
everything will have a negative repercussion, it's not as though the current system is full of positives either.
Do agree with the second one though, however I do think the community has the right to be involved, even if barely.
But hey
We have an idea we think is terrible
So let's, why not put it upto the test?
No better way to evaluate a theoretical model by providing a physical one
Hate to butt in here but I would like to give my 2 cents , Rename off-topic to general and move it above #tech-general and make support roles available by default which unlocks #quick-questions and #1006743093120352338 to beginners which'll mitigate the influx of new users polluting the other channels
besides a sticky is more than adequate
a whole separate channel is largely unnecessary
It’s already been similarly tested, and there’s already a glaring criticism that people frequently suggest another channel would make a good “general” instead
Involved yeah, by making suggestions, preferably new suggestions not just repeated old suggestions, which the mod team can then discuss
How would you mitigate against help vampyrsm? Would that just go into #info-rules ? /genq
The test was 3 years ago, with an extremely smaller sample size.
Of course, there is that issue, however for now we can disregard it and serve off topic as the only one for the part of this experiment
The server was still massive back then
maybe lock all channels behind a reaction in #info-rules
1st one is what we are discussing
2nd one is a hard no go. Though the system can be improved but that's another whole can of worms
Not to the scale it is now though.
Pretty sure it was at least 5K ish
That's a lot more than I expected to be honest.
But it's at 11k now, closely trailing 12k. More than double
With new members, I say it's worth another shot.
I mean yes but it’s still in the thousands
this is the issue
- if #tech-general is called #general, people treat it as if it's #off-topic, #off-topic goes unused, and there's nowhere to have technical discussions
- if #off-topic is called #general, then #tech-general goes unused, and there's nowhere to have technical discussions
the server was big Enough at the time (over 2000 members and decently active, iirc)
My point is to keep off topic as a non-topic channel
I'd like to bring up Kaizen's server which implements this, the general channel is always technical, rarely ever going out of scope.
#tech-general can still have its use AA being a #quick-questions alternative/replacement
we intentionally have no "this is where you talk about everything" channel
why do we need a channel specifically called #general
because IMO the current terms on #tech-general feels too binding.
And #off-topic is non conventional, most servers use general as a name for it instead.
kaizen's server is also orders of magnitude smaller than this one, and not on Discovery
too binding?
"this is a channel for technical discussions"
The hard no memes rules.
Yet we allow maths, physics and other content to it as well.
those are technical discussions
my opinion is the issue doesnt lay in the channel layout, but in the issue of people actively ignoring the rules
this
and people just never reading #info-rules
the solution is better moderation
and not letting people use zero effort and get away with it
i think info rules is also long overdue for a revamp, at the moment it also doesnt have that much clarity on support rules
and maybe locking channels behind a reaction in #info-rules
because support rules are in #readme-support-access
info rules doesnt really tell you that its there
we already have onboarding enabled, it is basically this
that would probably help people get less confused
and onboarding literally gives you a checklist
saying to go to #readme-support-access and read it
Maybe it is, however moderation shouldn't come at a loss of what you can do.
off topic remains dead for most of the day
and afaik when i last joined on an alt the channel list was a bit wonky with stuff like event stuff not being visible by default
all the alternatives cause other, worse issues
aren't those issues theoretical though.
this is because whoever set those up didn't properly configure them in onboarding, i can fix it
no, we saw them in practice!
I think that’s a discord issue?
no
moderator election 2 electric boogaloo 
3 years ago.
this is i think thanos not being aware of how onboarding interacts with channel visibility
The server has new members, and new moderators.
I say a 2 week experiment is worth a shot
yes, and this server is 5.5 years old
it was already established at the time
Well the support rules is quite vague and It's not enforced so why impose an extra burden on those seeking help it'll only further encourage them to ask questions on other channels hence if we make it more accessible it'll keep them within the pertinent channels if you know what i mean
yes but, 3 years is still old
So many people have gone and new members have come
Why don't we just host a one week experiment.
Any reason why?
It satisfies everything,
We can get new data and if it doesn't work out, we can kill every idea that comes knowing it was problematic
.eval e.server.creation_time.to_i / (365.25 * 24 * 60 * 60)
48.01991089309707
we already have #off-topic for all your off topic needs
uhh
It was enforced when I was a mod, and I warned people for being help vampires, if you see someone not adhering to the support rules in a support area you should definitely open a ticket and let the mod team know- and they should usually warn someone for it
.eval 1+1
nope
.eval (e.server.creation_time.to_i - Time.now.to_i) / (365.25 * 24 * 60 * 60)
-5.964293830963064
we have existed for -5.9 years
nearly six years old
Server is negative years old 😭
the server was created -5.9 years from now
That's quite a long time
Anna, what's wrong with my experiment idea
Just a one week system
im going to point towards the obvious solution: more mods and hus
Where everything changes and we can revert back
I doubt #tech-general would go unused It'll balance out the casual conversations and the serious ones similarly to #controversial-archive , those who want to have a formal technical conversation could redirect a convo from general to #tech-general as they do with #controversial-archive
We obtain new data to go over too.
as i keep saying, we've tried it several times as the server grew, and the experiment never worked
then what's wrong with the current #off-topic
Several? I was only mentioned one instance.
i tried pretty much every combination of channel names that's been suggested
we have these channels archived
You bring up a very good point , the only issue now is to encourage people to take up "non - linux discussion " to #off-topic perhaps removing the countdown could work?
this is unimportant
"the server had 5000 instead of 10000 people" is not really meaningful
that's not even an order of magnitude
You have a larger sample size compared to before.
And maybe, the new members are better compared to the old ones who know how to adhere to rules better
In stuff like humans, it's hard to evaluate a theoretical model.
Anna, please, just one week
Let's see how this goes.
If it goes bad, we won't do one again.
.eval Math.log10(e.server.member_count) - Math.log10(5000)
0.350092885458106
Thing is the support rules are pretty broad i would say .. and not well defined besides they are pretty universal and not specific to this server alone
It
the final answer is no
no convincing?
no
It's irrelevant whether they were enforced or not
yes, our rules generally are this way
If you think there are better support rules you could always make a new set you think would work and put them in another #1006744879583461418 thread?
"just be a decent person" basically
That could work
@rich mason what happened with my suggestions before I banned myself and took a break?
Yeah I dont mind that my question is why lock that behind a role? :/ unnecessary
wha
which ones
I made a new #readme-support-access channel, you wanted to change the FAQ
because some people don't read the rules and make trivial mistakes
ohhh
It’s probably still on the mod channels?
lol, well it’s there if you want to use it, if not delete?
99% of servers have a general channel
It really feels like this server went out of its way to be different -- people are used to a specific format
.eval Class.new { include Discordrb::IDObject; def id = 399813025600765974; }.new.creation_time
uhh
idk lol
Actually, now that I think, what was the problem faced with these channels
Except for naming ofc
Was there any other moderation related issue or not
Perhaps we could reach a compromise and add the support role in the server guide thingy y'know the pop up a user gets upon joining a server? that could help
Support got turned into a forums area
and we'd really appreciate it
that way, people just click through and no one reads the support rules
again, you are literally given a checklist on join
They’re talking about arch-support and memes I think, memes is #urandom
Alright then
Weird thing but can we move voice channels further down, below the Other section?
People rarely use voice channels
- multiple arch-support-X channels were deprecated in favor of threads
- memes was duplicate of #urandom
I don't mean as in that
that's true, they used to be a lot more active
Did it increase work on the moderation team?
You can make it so that people have to read the rules before they join the server though
It almost works
That's assuming a person isn't smart enough to know a scrollbar exists to just scroll down fully.
it's already this way
Human Nature is this way after all, we. We cant control it
Anna what about this
Evidently, this method of obscuring the help channels isn't solving your issue either way
Valk onboarding features are better at forced rules reading than discord, but discord onboarding features are better overall, with discord you just tick a random box at the bottom
If it 1) didn't increase rule breaking
2) didn't put more overhead on the mod team
Except for the semantics, which can be decided later, it's a good idea
I don’t know what you mean by human nature, it’s a very broad concept- which behaviour are you referencing?
the one of skimming things.
idk, i carefully read the rules of every server i join
Me too
But most people don't do that, from what I've seen.
And the reaction system doesn't work either as the second you see a reaction "oh right that gives me access"
Though I can see most people reading it
reading the rules is literally a requirement to access any of the channels, if someone doesn't do it and then gets talked to by mods, it's entirely on them
A lot of people do read #readme-support-access I think, even skimming is generally fine, as long as you pick up the information, but some people dont read them at all, and they never will, those people should get zero support.
fair point.
it's not our job to protect people from themselves
I've got an idea why dont we combine support-info and rules then force each and every member to read each and every line? I've seen some servers employ an orwellian method where they'd sneak a little code which would need to be inputted at the end to gain access to the rest of the server and that code was hidden within the rules that way new members would have to read the rules
how does that sound?
I know its harsh but very very effective
it sounds condescending and awful for anyone who is actually interested in participating
That isn’t Orwellian
and it feels like this alone would filter out people who are slow at reading
Well if we want EVERYONE to read the rules then that's your only solution
yup :/
we don't want to force everyone to read the rules
Well couldnt we pick the lesser of the two evils? I'd rather have those entering filtered
I mean if someone doesn’t read the rules but follows them that’s not inherently an issue, and a lot of people that break rules break them knowingly and purposefully
Would have less gnome users /s
if someone hasn't bothered to do so, it's on them if they act against them
It goes back to this
i use gnome...
satire aaa
Well that's just ignorant
(dont bring up my past moderation history) LMAO
it's a really good DE at this point and the reason most people don't like it is because they don't take the time to learn its unique workflow, and jump to modifying it to work like what they've always used, with buggy extensions
i dont mind it i just love the unwarranted hate it receives
and i just hop on and off the bandwagon sporadically
.xkcd 1172
KDE users:
accurate tbh as a kde user
It's almost psychological torture I'd say it classifies as orwellian
xD
Stop thinking it’s Orwellian or the mods will kick you- is as close as you could get to on a discord server 😉
it's not orwellian, there's no constant surveillance, mental manipulation and conditioning, enforcement of compliant language use to prevent thoughts of dissent
:p
fair and no doublethink
doesnt really constitute as orwellian , I guess i just really like the word haha
1984 is such a great book
Unless there is and Anna is gaslighting you about all of that, including the gaslighting /j
1984
what the fuck is gaslighting
*gaslamping
i dont even know what it is, how would i be doing it?
nobody is talking about gaslighting, its all in your head
obviously yeah
you're saying meaningless things, it's like you're crazy or something
gaslighting isn't a real thing
obviously
I wouldn’t know, I wasn’t allowed to read it, concepts were not compatible with what I was allowed to think as a child /j
he has gone insane
have you guys read animal farm?
it's very small
It is but it packs a punch
It reminded me of lord of the flies
and it definitely hit different knowing a lot more about the politics of the cold war era
ever heard of that book?
i also read that one while bored in middle school
... in after-school detention for misusing the computer systems
Honestly Middle-school literature isnt as mind-numbing and sleep inducing as i remember them to be
perhaps I've matured to understand and enjoy them
It’s an equally famous book
or it's not forced on you anymore
this too
and you're seeing the merit in them
less influential and more bland :p
Yes it’s a far less interesting book
It's always a treat when information isnt being forcibly shoved down your throats
wasnt a fan of the morbidity of it
same
#MemesIn#tech-general
Ironic that discord shows the downvotes before upvotes
7 upvotes and 3 downvotes so far
It's a net positive
it was basically denied lol

so dont expect this to be implemented
#gaming is in discussion 
less harsh change, and even that was pretty controversial

but yeah lol im willing to bet my double color roles that this wont be implemented
We will not be lightening enforcement on this
based
🍞
🍞
@oblique acorn why are you bumping this thread? /genq
It wasn't me who started it
I only replied to the 🍞
You did however coninue it...
my suggestion is that the thread is closed unless there is anything further of substance to be added, but please stop making it look like there is new information by posting nonsense messages- take that as a general guideline for #1006744879583461418
https://discord.com/channels/399812551963049995/1189257606368333904 This'll pretty much solve this issue
