#ban manjaro from #linux-support

43 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

royal eagle
#

title

left knoll
#

yes

royal eagle
#

reasons:
manjaro is generally bad and a lot of issues are probably manjaros fault
most manjaro users just use linux for bragging rights /hj
manjaro sucks

#

.s manjaro

lusty grove
fallow jay
#

Manjaro offered a pre-built Arch Linux experience (likely because this was absent for its time) with the usual "works with gaming" and other common applications. The second link from hadet.dev even mentions "It attempts to cater to the the same demographic of users as Mint".

I don't think banning Manjaro is enough. Attention needs to be redirected elsewhere to something that can do roughly what Manjaro claims it can do. There are also so many guides that recommend it uncritically in the same way that one would recommend installing Ubuntu.

This highlights the failures of Arch Linux to offer a coherent and well-built experience even as "build the system yourself" is the dominant ideology, otherwise a disaster like Manjaro likely wouldn't have happened. I think there should be a common basis or specification for Arch Linux builds that isn't just a hellish experience through the wiki which is built of isolated pages per topic which sometimes omits concerns of the overall system.

Endeavour OS sounds good but it doesn't have the same appeal as mentioned. It even says "A terminal-centric distro" on its front page. It just sounds like it's another tweaker or ricing operating system but a bit more friendly than plain Arch.

#

Things are different today than they were a decade ago. This is a good thing but I don't think the opportunity has been seized.

#

Ban Manjaro, but not thinking through the hard problem makes it worse and inexcusable.

fallow jay
#

I can write shit unlike you or many others

royal eagle
lusty grove
#

lmao

lusty grove
lusty grove
#

imagine

#

saying "you cant write well" after being accused of not writing well

lusty grove
#

oh wait you didnt even claim its ai generated technically you just said it soudns like ai

#

lmao

wintry fable
#

Yes

lusty grove
#

anyways, ban memejaro

livid oxide
#

bugjaro

#

gruh

livid oxide
#

aur crying on the right corner

fallow jay
lusty grove
#

Use antergos

silver garden
#

Denied

#

You're welcome

lusty grove
light geyser
#

Is this just a shitpost?

royal eagle
#

not really

#

i think it might be a good idea

light geyser
#

I'll say what I say in #tech-general , if people know the issues with manjaro, or simply aren't interested in hearing the negatives, and still choose to use manjaro, then that is their perogative, and as long as they use the correct tags in #1006743093120352338 as outlined by #readme-support-access then there really isn't a problem with them asking for help

light geyser
#

manjaro does have a tag, it's the other distros tag

#

it shares it with any operating system that isn't vanilla arch

light geyser
#

what is the argument for manjaro having its own tag?

#

those aren't argument for manjaro having it's own tag, every distro has it's own little issues and bugs, garuda could equally be said to need it's own tag by this logic.

slate nova
lusty grove
coral widget
#

based

mossy otter
#

best idea ever

lusty grove
#

must remove manjaro