#newbie try to install grub (Closed)
181 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
ok so sda1 is your efi partition, not your system partition ._.
soo
remove /mnt/boot
no
unmount /dev/sda3
so you are sure sda1 is mounted to /mnt?
then rm /mnt/boot
and just use /mnt as the grub command partition
499
blocked.
haha
bro that gif is weird
how long does it take for one cycle damn
so is it working?
I'm tired af
then just get this over with
rv
bruh ok wtdf
nothing is correct
run lsblk
weird ass
sda1 is not mounted bruh
sda3 is mounted
the hell are you talking about
fine leave it
mount /dev/sda1 /mnt/boot/efi
ok
run teh grub command
but with /mnt/EFI
right
scuffed setup
ok let's try something else
mount /dev/sda3 /mnt
Ok buddy I know the problem
weird partition layout I'd say
I'd say move the contents /dev/sda1 to /dev/sda3/boot and mount /dev/sda1 to /dev/sda3/boot/EFI
Mount the boot partition to /dev/boot/efi
Instead of just efi
Also just /boot works iirc
agh it's all fucked up
it does not
/boot as the efi partition??
/dev/boot
what is /dev/boot
I usually do either /mnt/boot but if it doesn't work I do /mnt/boot/efi
Does he have a directory for /mnt/boot/efi? He probably needs to make one
I mean I guess @manic cliff try the grub command but just with /mnt as installation directory
he does
scroll up
Yea
the fuck is going on
why the hell
What the fuck 😅
umount /dev/sda1
oh no wait
/dev/sda3 is scuffed
mnt but also root
what the fuck
also why do I suspect that /dev/sdb is your archinstall installation?
I don't think you can
you just fucked up a lot
just gave me a heart attack
"oops failed, formatted the drive"
...
Too few arguments for command note!
Usage: .note <name>
fuck why did it not do that
umount -R instead?
umount /mnt -R
umount -A /dev/sda1
that should work
lsblk?
yes!
actually
whate exactly are you trying to do here?
installing the bootloader for /dev/sdb?
which drive
is root
then run your grub command, but set the efi mount to /mnt and add /dev/sdb3 at the end
so it actually installs for /dev/sdb3 and not /dev/sda3
no
grub-install --efi-directory=/mnt/ /dev/sda3
should work
try mount
what does it output?
no it's not
/mnt is his boot partition
sda3 is root
sda1 is boot
sda1 is 500 megs man
So if he mounted boot to /mnt
Where is his root partition?
/dev/sda3
No, like where is it mounted
I don't think it's needed for teh installation
it only wants a device
not a mount point
Smh there is no reason to mount boot at /mnt
tehre is no reason to mount the root partition for nothing
He should have mounted root partition so the other files, such as /dev could appear
ugh
/dev is generated at runtime, no?
well that didn't help
ls /mnt
yeah I know
fucking hell what is going on
lsblk
mount /dev/sda1 /mnt
ls /mnt
WHY IS IT UNMOUNTD NOW
fucking dickhead os
nothing makes sense
FINALLY
run grub-install again
try /mnt and /mnt/EFI just in case
try both
in case it matters
oh!
then nvm for EFI
pacman -S efibootmgr
good sign
last step
to set your mobo tzo boot it
also take a picture of the full command
grub-install I mean
add /dev/sdb3 or whatever at the end, as to point it to your correct root partition
currently it will try to boot your iso
oyu need to set it to boot your actual root partition
did you add /dev/sb3 at the end?
or whatever your actual root drive is?
no
what is the device you want to boot? lsblk
You don't need to do that for UEFI
And it's the device name on BIOS anyway
I'm just going off past experiences and grub command syntax
This seems to have worked fine
well then go reboot I guess
Have you generated the GRUB config?
grub-isntall should do that, shoulnd't it?
not /etc/default/grub?
Oops I meant .cfg, not .cff
yes
I'd say
worst case would be to boot back into the iso and fix something
if that isn't the grub fuckup
Do you see anything related to GRUB or Arch in your boot entries?
@manic cliff I feel bad for you having to deal with grub and then having to use Discord on phone and making photos