have moderators stop "signing" their mod notes

[lyric rose]

fr we can already see whose the one issuing the modnote signing it only harkens back to the days of cringelords on smf forums and etc

[patent flume]

I sometimes do this if I'm banning someone, as they can't see who, this was my way of letting living know who it was without living having to ask someone else, or make an alt etc.

This is what valk showed me when I was testing things out with my alt

It says the length of time for a mute or ban, and the reason, but not which of the mod team did anything. So if someone wanted to contact the mod that took action, or only contact a mod who didn't take action, or just have closure on knowing who did ban them etc. they can have that information. If it's just a troll I don't bother, if I talk to them first explaining I'm banning them I don't both, but with living I have been having a low energy day and I've spoken to living a ridiculous number of times about their behaviour, so I don't really know what else there was to say.

[lyric rose]

O

now i c y

[subtle stone]

also, %whois doesn't show who did an action

%whois @lyric rose

[flat wyvern]

@lyric rose: 323477430855532544 | kant#2320
Account created at: 2017-06-11_15:03:49 UTC
Joined the server: 2020-09-16_15:12:12 UTC
Roles: @-everyone, member, archive, #controversial, color20 [c] and support access
1 known username: kant
3 known nicknames: 你是身穿經典袴, 經典袴 and 经典袴
They have 2 warnings, with these notes:
1) 2022-06-07: Muted for 100 days
2) 2022-10-06: agrees not to reaction gif/meme in linux

[patent flume]

that's true, but we don't really do it for most things anyway, is that something you want us to start doing? /genq

like I think I'm the only one to give out the notes on the agreement, so we know that's me, but the first one, I'd wager as Mu because of length, but I've seen I think all mods give out ones that just read "Muted for 100 days"

[subtle stone]

no

[lyric rose]

OOUUUGGHHH MY PERFECT CLEAN RECORD, STAINED OHHHHHHHHH

[flat wyvern]