#I can't get audio working for the 3.5mm jack
1143 messages · Page 2 of 2 (latest)
heres a better screenshot since its not split across 2 lines lol
no audio is coming out of the headphones
when I plug it into linux mint, it works
yeah I toggled the output devices
so there's Digital Stereo HDMI Output + Analog stero input
digital stereo hdmi output
analog stereo input
pro audio
I'm looking for analog stereo output
i see
since that's what it said on linux mint
what's librewolf
its a fork of firefox with security patches preapplied so u dont have to harden it urself
yeah i use both
in a weird spot with browsers atm am changing them up to use hardened firefox but idk what role i wanna use it in yet 
yeah I'm like that but with tor
I like my privacy, but I don't know what to use tor for, it's just so slow
firefox is amazing, I use around a dozen custom profiles for it and store the profiles on an external drive, I can use the same profiles wherever I go
use it for onion services and nothing else 🤷 if u have services u use that offer an onion site use it coz free privacyy
yee
see idk if i want firefox to be my primary browser for me to be signed in on all my accounts and such or if u want it to be my disposable browser for general browsing
i might use ungoogled chromium as my primary browser and firefox as disposable im not sure what i want yet
rn im using librewolf for everything lmao
browsers are kinda my jam, if you want tips I can probably help
I NEVER log into all sites on a single browser
in fact, by default, I use a firefox template using ffprofiles
how many browsers do u have installed lmao
all my profiles are hardened so that they don't save anything on restart
in fact could firefox containers be considered as private as separate browser instances?
I mean, I have firefox installed and that's it. But in terms of profiles? Around 12 and I intend on increasing that number
No
I don't recommend containers
whats wrong with them?
My browser setup is quite complicated so I wouldn't recommend it to the average person but, you aren't the average person
containers don't provide the same security as a separate profile
and I like being able to have different settings for each activity
for example, these are some of my profiles:
phf - my main profile
discord - discord only
study - I use it for studies related to school
shopping - i only have one shopping profile for a specific site
email - I use it to login to emails (I intend on installing QubesOS side by side with Arch, and I will only use Qubes to open emails cause they're a huge threat vector
Honestly, the more you compartmentalize your activities the better.
true
the easier solution, than using so many firefox profiles, is using Qubes
and more secure
however i need to consider the complexity and effort and balance it against my threat model
true but i dont wanna lock myself that hard into one specific setup
honestly I like my setup, it's convenient for me. But here's the thing, if you want to be able to login to every site on a single browser, on a single profile, your losing a lot of privacy and security.
What I'm saying is, I don't trust containers to fully protect my online privacy.
perhaps in future if i got another machine i could do all personal activities on that qubes machine and keep this one for general use
I definitely recommend qubes
i see, why is that may i ask?
in fact, if qubes was a bit more user friendly, and had better performance, i'd recommend it to everyone, and I'm pretty sure Zen is the future of computing
Supercookies
You ain't fooling facebook with those containers.
Actually, you're not fooling facebook by even using separate ff profiles
facebook is an example.
sites can track you across browsers, containers won't help
i mean can supercookies breach containers? ik regular cookies cant
I'm convinced even across VMs but that's a whole different story
Yes
I don't trust containers. I've never used them extensively.
I set about:profiles to my home page so it's easier to manage the profiles
i see i see
it's like a manager for your VMs
think of your profiles as VMs
also...
if you want to protect against supercookies across profiles, encrypt each profile.
assuming you only decrypt the ones you need, nothing can breach the encrypted profile
unless they're open at the same time
i see i see
I don't personally encrypt each profile but I would, if I wasn't planning on using Qubes
and that setup is a little complicated, requires a lot more work
encrypting each profile when needed, making sure not to decrypt too many at once, and decrypting when not in use, etc
i mean maybe u could sandbox the profiles and firefox using bubblewrap so they cant access each other 🤷 idk if that would work tho
I've never used bubblewrap, i'm not sure what protections it has.
also I doubt it would be any better than encrypting each profile
again, in this scenario, Qubes is the perfect solution
you can't beat qubes at this type of setup
can you run 2 instances of firefox with different profiles or is that not possible? as i would like to have up to 2 browsers open at the same time for general searching while using an account - i imagine this is not recommended but is it possible ?
qubes is a type 2 hypervisor so it will beat any VM or sandbox program
*type 1 hypervisor
if that wasn't possible my setup would be a whole lot less viable
my bad
oki good good
thats interesting
so how do u run multiple firefox instances? do u just open a new window and switch the profile?
using two profiles at once is fine. You're not fooling anyone by only using one at a time, it's not a concern for me.
yesyes
on any given hour I'm probably running like 3-4 at a time
yeah
firefox is really easy on the cpu/ram
it is yes
interesting well i will look into creating some more firefox profiles maybe off of the basis of arkenfox and try that setup out :)
maybe i will be able to just use one browser :)
ofc ofc
thats installed by default on librewolf aswell lol its pretty much a given lol
canvasblocker, cookieautodelete, decentraleyes as well
although ublock is king
i have them all installed on each profile by default
hmm i have heard conflicting things about those other 3, because as much as they may reduce tracking, more and more of their features are being included in firefox anyway and having more and more extensions can be a fingerprint in in of itself
(not just those 3 extensions ofc but just adding too many extensions in general)
yes, httpseverywhere is redundant now
I think canvasblocker is okay, the others are optional
yes thats a special case as well
It's hard to determine how much the others are contributing to your privacy/security
i haven't looked into the specifics and don't have enough knowledge to really know what they're doing
i mean i use all those 4 that u mentioned btw and also privacy badger (which i have heard is no obsolete actually) anyway
i read something the other week about them i will have to refind it and verify the reasoning
I wouldn't use privacy badger personally but I'm sure it's not bad
actually I'm pretty sure privacybadger is just a worse version of ublock origin
yeah its just not necessary and u dont want unnecessary stuff coz it can be used to fingerprint u
it works differently, but ublock origin can do 99% of what it does
alright
i'm gonna fuck around with my new install and see if it all works, thanks so much
send a fr
sent*
oh i forgot to send you a screenshot
wait did i
hmmm
i mean maybe try analog stereo input as the output lol? i think at some point kde got confused and mixed up the inputs and outputs of the 3.5mm jack controller
I tried all of them
there will be a way to fix it but idk how off the top of my head
u will prbly have to make pulseaudio configs or pipewire configs to switch the source and sink of the audio jack controller around i imagine
which is a pain but should be solvable
ok
(audio issue still unresolved)
local/wireplumber 0.4.11-4
Session / policy manager implementation for PipeWire