https://x.com/dwisecinema/status/1866684669401391208
If this is really the "NASA" "RRT-1" launch payload (see here for the name's origins https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=61922.msg2647550#msg2647550), which most thinks it's a GPS III satellite (Falcon 9 has the contract for SV10 while Vulcan has SV07-09, at least nominally), the lack of logo would be a departure from previous GPS III launches. And unlike previous ones neither USSF nor Lockheed Martin have publicized this launch so far.
e.g. SV06: https://twitter.com/planetdeimos/status/1614079044605153280
SV05: https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/463100639828770837/1316248712531673189/GPS_III_SV05_Falcon_9_B1062_LC40_061621_SpaceX_fairing_1.jpg?ex=675a5ba3&is=67590a23&hm=6a62bdc431d1d9b5b70a2e582c099e57288d93028f89b164daae0e174422b5f1&=&format=webp&width=1358&height=905
Some people offer the theory that this is to prevent criticisms of a Vulcan-bound launch being ditched but I'm not buying it. Could it have been really something else?
In any case, we might have the answer on the evening of December 13.
#GPS III-7 (RRT-1) | Falcon 9
263 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
On the other hand...the NOTAMs for 1st stage recovery and 2nd stage re-entry zones look so close to previous F9 GPS III launches that I really do think it's GPS III (though we won't know which of the 5 remaining - all declared ready for launch some years ago - until closer to launch):
Compared with the F9/GPS III SV06 launch:
Another weird thing: the previous GPS launch has marine navigation warnings around the launch site for just under 1.5 hours. https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=53035.msg2448997#msg2448997
This time it's 4 hours
SpaceX F9 : GPS III SV06 : CCSFS SLC-40 : 18 January 2023 (12:24 UTC)
Where to watch SpaceX rocket launches at Cape Canaveral. The best places & viewing locations locations to watch SpaceX Falcon 9, ULA Atlas V, SLS, Starship, NASA launches in person at Cape Canaveral, Florida. Where to go to see rocket launches if you are visiting Disney, Orlando.
ben cooper also says that a GPS launch is planned this month
This is why I'm still listing it as GPS
I did remember there was one or 2 cases where he got the identity wrong initially before though
it do be somethin
real
the payload is launching on the launcher
falcon
This is probably the best possible explanation I've seen: https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=61922.msg2647721#msg2647721
NASA is hosting laser retroreflector arrays on GPS III SV09 and GPS III SV10, so RRT-1 could mean Retro Reflective Target-1
SpaceX F9 : GPS III SV10 : CCSFS SLC-40 : NET 13 December 2024 (~23:30 UTC)
huh
The R-word on the G-word
Fairings are 215 and 218 if y'all wanted to know
They're the two fairing halves from Europa Clipper
something else
Based Clipper Fairings
ayo?
idk the source, saw in a chat
and I'm too lazy to look for it or ask, so deal with it on your own 
someone said B1085
and for some reason mentioned GPS III SV04 💀 they fixed themselves to SV10
NSF's Space Coast Stream yesterday I think
😵💫
rrt?
Presumably "Retro Reflective Target-1", referencing NASA's Laser Reflector Array (LRA) that is hosted on the satellite: #1316269456011300864 message
ohh
Well, hmm, Ben Cooper deleted his reference to this being GPS on his website…
The rocket NOTAMs still quacks like a duck though
If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck…
He did the same with Optus-X. Initially he called it Optus-X, but when SpaceX announced the mission, he called it TD7 and the Optus-X reference disappeared
B1085... called it
So do we still keep our entry here as GPS III SV10 or do we relist it
It really looks like a duck and quacks like a duck despite no-one really officially try to confirm it
So @slow portal ...do the NSF team really have "semi-insider" information that really confirms this as a GPS III launch? 'cause, well, NSF is actually the first media to actually call that out (horror)...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qbDifEAAK4U
GPS-3 (Global Positioning System) or Navstar-3 (Navigation System using Timing And Ranging) are the first evolution stage of the third generation of the GPS satellites.
The U.S. Air Force announced in May 2008 that a team led by Lockheed Martin has won the competition to build the next-generation Global Positioning System (Navstar) Space System...
No we just think it might be and therefore we put it
Hmm, hopefully we all are right!
I really think there's no way it isn't GPS
I had a quick look and it seems the launch might be heading to GPS constellation orbital plane C (there are 6, A to F), which last saw a new GPS satellite in July 2015 (so back in the Block IIF days)
geps
Did any of ships depart to scoop the fairings? 
Doug
use his full government name (according to my mom anyway) smh
he's Douglas the Tuglas
bob the slob
123rd booster reflight this year
And B1085 will become fastest booster to 4 launches (B1083 was the fastest to 3 launches, but its long turnaround for its 4th mission on Polaris Dawn meant that B1083 was only 11th fastest to 4 launches)
even B1058 was faster to 4 launches than B1083
1 minute push back for this
Less than one hour until Falcon 9 launches RRT-1 to orbit from Florida. Teams are keeping an eye on weather, which is 50% favorable for liftoff → https://t.co/YHCCvjzcQI
50 💀
:/

Looks like a scrub
No T-20 minute vent and this is updated to December 14 https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1lPJqOevRqYKb
@gritty crown u jinxed the wrong launch 
Due to high winds, we are standing down from today's launch of the RRT-1 mission. Teams will continue to keep a close eye on the weather as we work toward the next best launch opportunity. A new target launch date will be shared once available
Sounds like maybe not going to be tomorrow
60% GO + Booster Recovery Weather risk High...I doubt it
i got my merlins so idc lmao
https://www.patrick.spaceforce.mil/Portals/14/Weather/Falcon 9 RRT-1 L-2 Day Forecast - 15 Dec Launch.pdf
SLD45 weather forecasts says NET Sunday evening
It's from Ben Cooper
The next SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket will launch the RRT-1 mission for the U.S. Space Force from pad 40 on December 16 at 7:52 p.m. EST.
https://www.launchphotography.com/Launch_Viewing_Guide.html
Where to watch SpaceX rocket launches at Cape Canaveral. The best places & viewing locations locations to watch SpaceX Falcon 9, ULA Atlas V, SLS, Starship, NASA launches in person at Cape Canaveral, Florida. Where to go to see rocket launches if you are visiting Disney, Orlando.
i guess god misheard me when i was talking about 11-2 😭😭
SpaceX webpage updated, they are indeed on for a Monday attempt
Targeting Monday, December 16 for Falcon 9 to launch RRT-1 to orbit from Florida. Weather is 75% favorable for liftoff and teams continue to monitor recovery weather → https://t.co/YHCCvjzcQI
You know, I've always theorized that having the gray band on the RP-1 tank for GPS missions was due to the launch time and the exposure to sunlight. Looking at the launch times... I may not be that far off. Those that were launched later in the day carried the gray band while the ones launched early in the day did not carry it.
GPS-III SV01 - 13:51 UTC NO
GPS-III SV03 - 20:10 UTC YES
GPS-III SV04 - 23:24 UTC YES
GPS-III SV05 - 16:09 UTC NO
GPS-III SV06 - 12:24 UTC NO
GPS-III SV10 - 00:51 UTC YES
Not sure how it actually works but it might be the reason why we see the gray band on some missions and don't see it in others
IIRC SV04 didn't have a gray band
Huh I had seen pictures of it with the band, I guess they were photos of 3
Yeah it did not
SV04 did have a weird gray patch on the interstage though for some reason
Poor 62
i think that was just the TPS
did they forget to apply the TPS on that lower part lol?
1 minute tweak to T-0
Propellant load is about to begin and teams are keeping an eye on weather ahead of tonight's Falcon 9 launch of RRT-1 from Florida → https://t.co/YHCCvjzcQI
Stuck at a drawbridge omw to see it 💀
Looks like it's :00 on the seconds
GPS III-10 (RRT-1) | Falcon 9
Hmm
peak
I might have miscounted the stream delay
Commentary of T-0 at 00:51 probably false
2nd flight of both fairing halves, about a 2 month turnaround of those halves
Going to be a fun one to confirm mission success if the USSF is not saying a word about it
Well if it’s really GPS there will be confirmations through its user messages
How quick do those come after launch?
Liftoff!
Liftoff
first f9 launch im watching in ages
asds or rtls?
👍
Fairing sep
Herro chat
nice
Entry burn
lmao "on second thought we might not have great views of entry burn"
Entry burn shutdown
Landing burn
Landing confirmed
Nominal parking orbit insertion
nice
another excellent landing
6 people in mission control
Well the real ones working should be at the Cape isn’t it
it would be pretty funny if this is not a GPS satellite and SV10 launches in 2 or so years from now
The rocket return/re-entry zones and launch timeline looks too close for it NOT to be GPS to be honest
But it might not be SV10
IIIB SV01 
It is a GPS satellite
I don't understand why they have this much secrecy for a GPS launch
especially since they are the least classified satellites the space force operates
Yeah and they’ve publicly shown gps launches before so it’s weird
i fucking love falcon man
3 photogs were all slightly off? flight club missed lmaoooooo
great pics by all 3 though
sameeee
well it’s going to MEO no?
it is but deployment happened at <t:1734402072:t>
are they in ground tracking range
wtf does RRT-1 mean
I would assume if they weren’t 20 minutes ago they would be now so I don’t know
sometimes they also just take a hot minute
we’ll get a deployment tweet or a HAHAHAHAHA SO GUYS remember zuma… please don’t be mad……
Normally these missions take an hour or two after deployment for confirmation
There we go
It's finally out
Rapid Response Trailblazer
SV07

Named Rapid Response Trailblazer-1 (RRT-1), this mission was a U.S. national security space launch and was also intended to demonstrate military capabilities to condense a typical two-year mission planning cycle to less than six months.
The decision to accelerate the launch of SV-07 was made in mid-2024 when uncertainty around the Vulcan rocket’s readiness led Space Force leaders to reassess their options. Horne emphasized that this move was less about Vulcan delays and more about testing the boundaries of the NSSL program’s flexibility. “This is a way for us to demonstrate to adversaries that we can be responsive,” he said.
Horne said the satellites have been remanifested. Because SV-07 was reassigned to SpaceX, ULA will get to launch SV-10.
Alrighty then so a complete swap
Walt Lauderdale, chief of Falcon systems and operations at the Space Systems Command, said SpaceX’s familiarity with the GPS III program was instrumental in pulling off this mission on a short timeline. The company had previously launched five GPS III satellites.
“Our typical launch campaign is a 24-month cycle,” said Lauderdale.
Horne stressed that the goal of the RRT-1 mission was far more than just launching a GPS. It’s also about the Space Force learning how to be more adaptive. “That’s why we’re calling it a trailblazer mission,” he said. “We’re trying to send a message to an adversary that if a GPS asset were targeted, the United States would be able to get another one up quickly.”
The RRT-1 mission was intended to prove that the rapid deployment approach can be applied to larger, more complex national security payloads like GPS.
None of that Victus whatever shit
The decision to accelerate the launch of SV-07 was made in mid-2024 when uncertainty around the Vulcan rocket’s readiness led Space Force leaders to reassess their options. Horne emphasized that this move was less about Vulcan delays and more about testing the boundaries of the NSSL program’s flexibility. “This is a way for us to demonstrate to adversaries that we can be responsive,” he said.
Yeah LOL, I mean it's not like that the GPS program didn't have built-in contingency procedures to reassign launches over different rockets to keep the system running in the past 💀
there is one rocket and it is delta 2
Too small for today's GPS satellites
I do wonder had there been problems during the GPS Block IIF era, can they switch between Atlas V and Delta IV easily?
Its basically USSF telling ULA that they don’t trust them anymore and future missions will likely go to spacex
But in a diplomatic way
Why would USSF not trust them anymore
I think it's less extreme than "don’t trust them anymore" than "being a little sus at ULA" but yeah
I wasn't following spaceflight as closely as you were when IIF was launched
Check the comments on RE
Why would they have any reason to even be sus at them?
Because of Cert-2?
#316186751565824001 message
It's just that USSF isn't exactly satisfied with Vulcan being able to fly their satellites yet (i.e. it's not yet certified), that's what I mean as "sus"
After all managing GPS satellites replenishments is a serious matter, the USSF must have been satisfied enough to give SV07-09's ride to them and now finds out ULA isn't ready yet
It's not that serious IMHO but still something that I think USSF was not hoping to happen
This article also means the GPS satellites aren't exactly same enough that they can simply pull one out of storage and launch on whatever rocket they have certified/flown on with the GPS program within weeks
Well USSF hasn’t certified Vulcan yet, it sounds more like their problem of certifying them. ULA has had delays yes, they held off for a while on Cert-2 because they wanted to wait for Dream Chaser but eventually decided to go without DC. Of course they did have that Centaur boom pre Cert-1 that definitely delayed it. What I’m getting at here is that the USSF has no reason to be sus at ULA. ULA has continually tried to get Vulcan going as fast as possible. They’ve experienced setbacks yes, but that’s no reason to be sus at them.
I understand them switching the payload to get it going faster, but the USSF shouldn’t be mad at ULA, the USSF is also at blame here for the slower ramp up. ULA is ready for the next Vulcan flight, the vehicle is fully assembled and is just waiting certification then payload.
Maybe their suppliers (cough NG cough) shouldn’t screw up 
The Centaur boom was probably entirely ULAs fault
But Cert-2 GEM failure was most likely NGs fault
But there’s never been a report or anything
NG and whatever the hell RUAG's name is today
Why do all the launches happen when I'm asleep
This timezone sucks
UTC+3...
i wouldnt be surprised if ULA just wont get any new task orders for the next 4 years
if USSF is already this soured on them
Falcon 9 launches the RRT-1 mission from Florida
Falcon 9 launches the RRT-1 mission from Florida
I do wonder if RRT will become a legal mechanism to move non spacex payload contracts to spacex
doubt it
so some dude on another server said the legal mechanism is already there in nssl
¯_(ツ)_/¯
god I miss her
can't wait for the RL-10E RUD of April 2026
IIRC the USSF already has the option to move any NSSL launch between vehicles
yeah someone told me that later, so not sure why did vulcan gain sv-10 then
ussf guy said it had to get swap to vulcan
if it wasnt legally required then
I'd guess that that probably was the easiest option to prevent any contractual shenanigans with ULA
Same as GPS III SV01, which says "GPS III-2"
why was it 02 btw back in the days?
Did they swap laucnhers too (but w/ less stressful timeline like this one)

Because the tail number of the spacecraft was 2, not 1
interesting
Oh... this hurts https://fixupx.com/SLDelta45/status/1869481348794089508
who is their target audience 😭
what's the issue?
They let a Gen Z wrote the script 
LMAOO
Brainrot
its mean girls
But the GPS MEO is thousands of km away from the O3b MEO 
Did Doug return with the halves?
lmfao
star of the show 💀



