https://nextspaceflight.com/launches/details/753
https://www.isro.gov.in/GSATN2EnhancingIndiaBroadbandInfrastructure.html
#GSAT-20/GSAT-N2 | Falcon 9
269 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
PERFORMANCE NARMAL
g sat
real
6.67×10^-11 sat
Gsat
I don't think yt does closed captions for livestreams anymore it's so sad
Where's JRTI right now and the ETA for getting back to Port Canaveral?
Is there enough time to support launching on the 18th?
Not too far away as of a few hours ago
I believe the record for time from port to landing zone is something like 36 hours, so should be enough time left to reach the LZ
I’ve never been up there at the right time to see them unfortunately
Ik where to go to see them but am never there at the right time ☹️
Alan V
hmmm
sounds extremely similar
the ULA spies are back at it
JRTI is now leaving port
They literally lifted the booster right as it docked and it's on the port with no stand lmao
Absolute sight
three boosters in port right now
LMFAO
huhge
Peculiar
and the fun little pictures for each mission because why not
SpaceX Mission Patch
25.86 day turnaround of B1073, 7th fastest overall
And record JRTI turnaround at 4.215 days, current record 4.742 days (not particularly impressive compared to ASOG's record of 3.509 days)
And B1073 will become fastest booster to 19 launches, beating old record of 985 days by B1071 with 918 days
And with this launch SLC-40 will match its total of 55 launches from last year, with a month and a half left to go (SLC-4E and 39A long ago passed their respective totals)
[ Credit: NSF SpaceCoast Live ]
BIRB
So basically it’s not delaying
Yep
They'd need to scrub for the day for that, so then it's delaying more then 10 minutes 
Then why does the window on the app say it has until 3:20
Because that is the window, but once they start propellant load, they cannot move it anymore and would need to scrub
F9 cant hold prop load and restart
something something super chilled
Oh
I see
No?
no
Why would it be?
where tf they got that 2nd stage with small velcro pads, last time we saw it on SL 10-7 launch mid-August
after that there only been long velcro pads (or basically no velcro/MEK)
probably a reserved older stage
been a long reserve 
indian government got freaked out after F9 failures in july/august
so they probably reserved it in july
Yeah that's probably the case
I hope they removed that valve 
whats the fun in that
This was originally scheduled to launch in Early-August
a valve caused a failure IIRC, so they had to remove it on next stages to avoid that shit again
nvm just being silly 
Viasat will actually be using this satellite to provide in-flight connectivity over India, because for some reason they're not allowed to use their own satellites for that
Fairings flying for 5th and 1st times
im placing bets, SN213 for one of them
and 220 for the other
where the FUCK are my fairing SNs
16 Falcon 9 launches in the last 30 days
howfas
Entry burn shutdown
8160 km/h
damn
Landing burn
SECO-1
NOI
Landing confirmed
First JRTI landing for B1073 in over a year
michael baylor from nsf
Mike Taylor retiring from SpaceX after almost 17 years
It was unfortunately too cloudy to see
And my phone died right before so I couldn’t watch the stream 💀
average Florida experiece 
420
Spacecraft separation!
Updated
is CRS-1 counted as successful?
Yes
aight
GSAT-N2 weighing 4700 kg has been injected into the desired Geo-synchronous Transfer Orbit (GTO) and ISRO’s Master Control Facility (MCF) has taken control of the satellite. Preliminary data indicates satellite in good health.
(2/3)
Already talking to the satellite
wow next F9 is the 400th

It's three F9 boosters
not 3 F9 S2s tho
yeah but that doesnt count as three Delta IV launches does it
Delta IV Medium has two types of second stages
i mean unless this checklist u have is F9 booster launches
So do you count those as different flight numbers
then thats fair
It's just launches
Falcon Heavy is part of Falcon 9 because it uses the same hardware by pretty much all means
Falcon Heavy has its own separate flight numbers... 
personally id keep them separate but who am i to tell u im just an irrelevent internet user
if falcon heavy is part of falcon 9, then how do you differentiate between f9+fh launches and f9 launches?
its part of the falcon 9 family
but i wouldnt class it as a f9 launch
same way a Delta IV Heavy is part of the Delta IV family but its separate to the Delta IV medium
It ain't that hard
i meant when you say stuff like the 400th falcon 9 launch
Not sure what you mean
by your definition, that number includes fh and f9. what if you wanted to express only the number of f9 launches, excluding fh? it would be stupid to say ”400th falcon 9 launch, not counting falcon heavy launches”
I still don't get it
I don't need the F number to know how many Falcon 9s have been launched
Again, let me point this to you lol
It's all automated to count them without needing to even look at whatever F number they have
so 33 of those 399 are FH F9s
but you said the number of falcon 9 launches includes falcon heavy launches
yeah exactly
No
I said the F number included Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy
It's not even the number of Falcon launches
Because there have been more Falcon launches than F numbers
which one is the F number
does F mean flight
It's completely different from the table before
alright
This thing does not count any F number stuff
It just takes how many missions are under Falcon 9 and Falcon 1, Falcon Heavy, and Starship
And then it spits out which ones were successful and which ones were not
does F number include the 4 F1s?
No because it's a completely different rocket
alex i dislike your numbering system
alright
Also it was 5 F1s
same
but hey who cares if its not ours
if it suits alex then it doesnt matter
And the 399 here counts Amos 6 which was a mission but not a launch
And it also counts suborbital launches of the full Falcon 9 rocket such as the one for In-Flight Abort Test
So far there have been 397 orbital launches of Falcon 9, 395 of which have been successful
so 3 more till 400 orbital ones
And 5 to 400 successful
next one is 400 if u count those two then
this is like counting the countries of the world
Is AMOS-6 counted in the "official" flight numbers for F9?
Also is SH-# the actual designation for Starship flights?
I need something to put in the parentheses under "Starship Flight #" other than "(IFT-#)"
they're not IFTs
Nah I made that one up for my own spreadsheet
oh really? sadge
I DON'T HAVE ANYTHING TO REPLACE IT WITH
Also because it sounds like n*zi shit
ssh is and will forever be sea surface height to me 😭
F1, GH, F9R, F9, FH, SN, SH
easy
Just do SFT or FLT
I'm not happy about the IFT thing either but as I've said many times I can't replace it until SpaceX releases an actual numbering system
Just please don’t use IFT
Use FLT
or SFT
Something besides it
IFT makes me wanna throw up im sorry 💀
otf
Absolutely not
SpaceX uses FLT in all of their NOTAMs
Also as much as I want to replace the IFT rn I just think it's funny how it pisses everyone off which is why I'm still gonna leave it until SpaceX gives an actual designation
Where did the F9-### and FH-### numbers even come from in the first place
alex made them up
F9 and FH- have been used for a while now
i’m not sure where they came from but it’s bow they’re listed on wiki
nope, cuz SpX doesn't count missions, they count ALL successful launches 
define successful launch
new documentary by matt walsh titled what is a successful launch
payload deployment is my bar of success
payload deployment in a usable orbit
a usable orbit is defined as one that can be utilised for the satellite's primary functions
yeah
The real question is what is a partial success
payload gets into an unusable orbit
but an orbit nonetheless
or only one of the few payloads fails to get to its designed orbit
As always McDowell has the answer to such questions lol
Jonathan McDowell's new homepage
He says off-nominal orbit but usuable is a partial success
And orbit but not usuable is a failure
ask SpX 
afaik Zuma wasn't successful (I don't rember who claimed it, might be my poor memory making it up), but it's counted in as well 
SpaceX called Zuma a success, I believe it was WSJ who claimed it was a failure
ye I rember Northrop supplied PAF adapter and it didn't work 💀
I meeeean
rocket did work, it did achieve intended orbit
just one particular element didn't succeed 
Yeah that's what the report says, don't think it was ever confirmed by the NRO (unsurprisingly)
What ship went to scoop the fairings? 
Bob

I'd expect Doug to remain out there for 6-66
https://www.nsilindia.co.in/sites/default/files/GSAT-N2 Launched successfully.pdf
After nearly 34 minutes of flight, GSAT-N2 got successfully injected into its intended super Geo-Synchronous Transfer Orbit (GTO) with Perigee of 250 km, Apogee of 59,730 km and 27.5 degree inclination.
1651 m/s to GEO
booster
bostre
That's in UK English
boosta
Did Bob came back to port with fairing halves? 

