#Starship Flight 6
1 messages · Page 5 of 1
i do think it's plumbing of some kind but i'm assuming pneumatics
doesn't look cryo
maybe high pressure GN2 or GHe
I can get more pictures.
yeah but also thats probably just all i can conclusively say anyway on it lol
also whatever that is it certainly is not a flex hose
at least not intentionally
Quite rigid
yeah disregard I only saw the one photo in the dark and also may be fucking stupid
I'll grab some more pictures. Please hold.
see part about being a collosal dumbass
it's some form of toob
fascinating
It's probably unimportant GSE since there were a ton of cryo trucks.
So Stage 0 looked healthy to me
tile?
Rubbery material
iirc there’s a number to call to report debris, it’s technically theft if you don’t check with them first lol
With what appears to be char
Ope. I will check with them
oh huh
yeah, i dunno where that number is
haven’t seen it since flight 1
game is game maddie
why give them an opportunity to ask for it lol
because it’s doing the right thing?
bleh
if it’s not important they probably don’t care
ik people have called in tiles etc and they got to keep them
it’s also helpful to know where stuff falls etc
@tidal glen
I will email.
That’s for CRS-7
Ope
Still active as of Crew-7
Already sent the email. I will happily return any debris.
oh interesting
Thank you for confirming this real spiffles statement
Top was the pipe. Bottom two were rubber
Caveman painting Starship?
you're talking to ms tax fraud
for fucks sake
I don't commit tax fraud
oh
best summary. stealing this 🫳
pushes ship hardest it's ever been pushed
has their smoothest entry yet
what in the FUCK????
Yeah that's def just some random pneumatic line
Nothing special
It does look like it very violently stopped being a pneumatic line
push harder
wait that's a badass ceiling design
control room iirc
It’s even missing tiles
LMFAO
I'm in a chat with some dumbass who thinks booster didn't land due to TRUMP WATCHING THE LAUNCH

like "uh oh it's reputation loss if it fails"
my brother in christ, it failed already 
the only semiplausible explanation would be tighter margins due to VIP presence but in reality lol no
they were like 6 miles away from the launch site 
there are a lot more danger from a crowd of ppl at control center rather than the flying beer can
yeah that’s why i said semiplausible but in reality no
assuming they were at the production site, more like 2
they didnt show the hawthorne crowd once on stream 🤔
tho that's way before (or way after) the launch
they were at the control room no?
turns out it was the tower that had problems
I mean the bent antenna probably didn't help
second vid, that's next to Ad Astra school
seems liek they either moved control room or they have another one farther away
Please report these if you haven’t already. Anything found could be beneficial
They went to the control room after the booster landing
He watched the launch from outside; probably not too far from the room
pretty sure someone can pinpoint it better than me
My theory is something similar, previously they mentioned updating commit criteria for catch, and that means probably more stricter and tighter criteria which the booster didn't meet(obv )
it was the tower that aborted but sure
Why would they close their commit bounds in response to a successful catch?
Already done.
Thanks! We appreciate it
They had already called out tower is good
I forgot who but eitherMusk(a truly reliable source of unbiased info) or SpaceX themselves said they were aiming at a more efficient catch
Wait that made no sense
Statement on SpaceX' website says that divert triggered by health checks on the tower
So something must have gone NO-GO after that was called out
Anyone have a copy of the NOTMAR? I'm trying to put a pin on the map for where I watched from.
Our boat may have even crossed the NOTMAR line briefly.
Yeah I think that Musk said that. SpaceX Twitter stated that it would “expand on booster capabilities” so you can likely read into that as similar statements
elon loves bulletproof stuff
but is it steel-ball proof?
#starship cruising through Barceloneta, Puerto Rico @SpaceX Flight Test 6.
Go Starship, go #SpaceX
Video 📹 by: Graciano Rosario https://t.co/bYnD8iH11P
Is this something likely to be the antennas on top of the tower that fell over a bit, or do we think that was unrelated?
Possibly, but the chopsticks were also behaving different compared to Flight 5: https://x.com/CSI_Starbase/status/1859074034698183118
An interesting thing I noticed, but didn't think much of at the time...During the pad avoidance maneuver, the chopsticks seemed to take quite a beating (per usual).
After Starship cleared the tower the chopsticks began closing to perform the automated health checks. The ended up opening up again a few minutes later which did not happen during flight 5. This the time period where the issue was detected.
Since the road opened crews have been on the chopsticks performing inspections.
Note: You can also see the before and after of the lightning tower damage. I doubt this truly played a part in triggering the abort but its possible it was a factor
Here is the Official statement from SpaceX:
"Following a nominal ascent and stage separation, the booster successfully transitioned to its boostback burn to begin the return to launch site. During this phase, automated health checks of critical hardware on the launch and catch tower triggered an abort of the catch attempt."
Full tweet
Gah D has a photo that's like exactly like the second one there
Send it
I’m in desperate need of flight 6 pics
Congratulations @SpaceX on the incredible sixth test flight of Starship. We captured the launch plume live from our cameras on the Space Station 🚀
El lanzamiento de la Starship y el aterrizaje en el mar del Super Heavy visto desde satélites.
@SpaceX #Starship #Starbase #IFT6
hopefully EDA's fellas caught the booster explosion in slo motion
most likely
why assume that it's still floating just because the boats are out there
plus they've shot it until it sank in the past
the boats are following it
Do you have a different reason for these boats to be very slowly moving?
oh
no
these artifacts are interesting. you can see that they happen during the downlinking from the ship, because in the twitter stream the artifacts continue moving with the ground as if nothing happened. the ship would not encode something like this, so this mustve happened at some point after that. iirc tom scott has a video about movement as a video encoding technique
(translated message)
Source: https://t.me/ivan_mks63
Anyone have a gif of ship and booster landing ?
cosmodrome 💀
Космодром is such a cool word tho
this is a better translation
i was reading the first paragraph and initially approached it like a pro-russian telegram post. then i read "i managed to capture" and realised what i was looking at 💀 im so cognitively biased
I liked this launch, yeah the booster didn't do the thing but other than that preformed nominal. The real show was that ship landing, incredible
This?
Also the people complaining that the booster fell into the ocean are ignorant to the fact every other rocket does that. (With the exception of f9 and fh [I am not counting the penis rocket])
:|
Small diversion to the Indian Ocean
floating platform
And uh floating platform
it is now a floating platform tbf
Was sonic boom heard?
Think it was 30km offshore. Didn’t see anyone report the boom
Ah
I love the press ❤️❤️❤️
Boater
Booter
The Daily Mail; disregard
It’ll be the same as usual, most clickbait headlines but overall decent and factual articles, with people complaining about the headlines, assuming the articles are also bullshit, and ignoring the press companies that actually have decent headlines and articles
Happens every time
Boca chica cosmodrome 😭
That actually sounds cool
shitty firefox translation
“cosmodrome” is just a better word overall
Who wrote that lmfao
@spacesudoer Lost comms to the launch tower computer. Catch would probably still have worked, but we weren't sure, so erred on the side of caution.
incredible
I mean the antenna was fine last time
fixed
I heavily doubt it tbh
Well they said it was go for tower initially so they did have communications with it but obviously lost it later on and there’s no way that’s what they rely on for such a critical thing cause that tower is the most likely thing to be destroyed during a launch
Elon never mentioned the antenna. Just to note
do you know something we dont
booster fell off
how else are u gonna communicate with the tower?
underground cables which aren't as susceptible to getting plumed?
I'm just saying. Maybe it is the antenna. Maybe it isn't.
Laying cables is expensive and often unnecessary
i would lay cable
I need to find out what country the stuffed banana came from...
woah
Cables or at least have a second option of communicating with it then a little antenna
tracert
Lightly roasted b̶a̶n̶a̶n̶a̶ launch tower.
Print: https://t.co/f7S5ISkMwr
📸 - @NASASpaceflight
mexico took over ift6. all the photos are orange
we didnt even get blue flame on stream

They do. I saw boxes for the fiber.
They really did tone down the CO2 didn’t they
I’m also almost certain that’s a regen channel leak there
People say this every flight I swear
I sorta agree
Would lay cable to like, a more robust small building like near where the test pads are, then wireless from there to LC
daily heil detected, messaged rejected
okay i cant lie i missed the earlier bit of this and thought you meant a cable from the booster to the tower 💀
Ye but are we sure there’s a leak
yeah it was me, i was the leak
LMAO
man really returns to twitter posting just to dunk on the BBC
i respect that so hard
It's not how big it is but how you use it

Next level quote
called it
flamey end sidewards
Oh so it actually burned
I had no idea why people kept saying that it was in flames cuz I couldn't see it on any views
But I guess it was
residual methane probably?
So I looked at my pipe again and found what looks to be remains of a hose on one end.
Meaning probably hydraulic.
your pipe
Also people found this hose
my pipe looks different
If only all girls said this 
TSE probably knows the exact part number and location this pipe came from 
TSE?
The Space Engineer.
@plush crown
That is a garden hose
lmao did someone loose their garden hose
it's the same construction as one probably got blown off the bunker I know they have some of that stuff there
Average tankwatcher discussion
being completely serious they have a garden hose on the OTF bunker south side
I knew he'd know lmao
The fact that:
- It's a garden hose
- You know exactly which building in Boca it came from
Does not do anything to dispel that statement
true
according to ryan hansen space i was correct
#SpaceX #Starship Flight 6 bellyflop and splashdown stabilized! Watch as the ship pitches forwards before flipping to perform its landing burn:
I never noticed this https://vxtwitter.com/cham_kyle/status/1859237802522874053
I was researching the flight 6 stream and did anyone notice the BANANA DANCE??
Broadcast reuploaded by @mcrs987 https://t.co/dl3l6PFnkk
not very good
What about the pipe?
Found about here
damn it I was expecting some cool fact 🤣
GOD DAYUM
sex
Yes. That was after I moved it.
It was initially by the road
I noticed it lol
That fireball was so cool in person
Even if I only saw the top...
oo\
could you hear it?
could you fel the heat
No
for flight 5 i was able to feel heat on landing burn
It was either that or a second set of sonic booms
did you get sonic booms??
no clue why the sonic booms wouldn’t come together, the HSR’s would be pretty dang close to the booster’s
Two sets of booms. Double booms for both. Second was probably the booster exploding.
assuming it even gets one audible from that distance
ohh cool i hadnt heard anyone mention sonic booms
like no videos or anything show them either
Not super loud
I may have the first set on video
Turned it off right before the second.
oo
I'll have to check. It was my camcorder.
They're both sonic booms
Booster main boom and then the ground reflected boom
Possibly the hotstage later but I don't have a solid record of it
But that was the case with FLT5
tons of people confusing the reflected booster boom 30s after touchdown for the hotstage boom, when in fact the hotstage boom was almost a minute 30 after touchdown
It was the hot staging ring sonic boom
The BYU team we interviewed had data from it and the sonic boom profile was completely different from the sonic boom profile of the booster
It was a double sonic boom, not triple, and it had ripples which indicate heavy turbulence in the airflow compared to the booster's sonic boom which was pretty much clean
I commend BYU for getting a multiple-century head start on researching how to build the Nauvoo
Here's the graphic with the sonic booms and launch audio levels
Booster sonic boom vs hot staging ring sonic boom
oh wait what
And the link to the paper https://pubs.aip.org/asa/jel/article/4/11/113601/3320807/Starship-super-heavy-acoustics-Far-field-noise
lmao what
Slightly tasteless The Expanse reference lmao
But it was even after this graph ends
You say the reflected boom was the one happening 30 seconds after the booster boom
Roughly hold on I'll get the exact times here
That's the one in the graphic and it has a different profile
They also found out that for some reason the engine noise at landing burn is still quite loud and very equivalent to the launch audio noise level
Which is on squares b and d
Okay wait just so we're on the same page this is all FLT5 data right
Yeah
And there was three booms. Booster main, booster reflected, and hotstage
They only recorded two sonic booms
I also don't recall hearing on our audio any third sonic boom
We did see the reflected boom because of the cloud interactions but not sure how we'd hear it
I was recording for multiple minutes after touchdown so I've got all of them I can compile them real quick here
Unfortunately I talked over like two of them I think but they're still very audible
I can go back if you want and listen to the thing, we have hours of footage before, during, and after flight so it'd be easy to go check in a sec
Yeah I'm going to get you specific timemarks here in a second
Just waiting for it to export
I've listened to one of the feeds and what I found is at 8:28:27 in the recording is the booster boom, then at 8:29:16 there's a distinctive double sonic boom, the one on that paper. About 20 seconds later, at 8:29:38 into the recording, there's a faint thud, only detectable when bumping up the volume a lot. Another faint thump can be heard a minute after the double sonic boom at 8:30:16
That faint thud was much louder compared to the double
At least from my vantage
You can hear how that second double is also muffled which lends to it being reflected more
The last one is still sharp
What would it have reflected off of tho
The ground
Oh there's some helicopter video somewhere where it is especially apparent
@plush crown any idea what my metal pipe is for?
I can't really ID it because it's so generic. Just standard probably fluid line, not cryo, from who knows where
threads on the end just standard 3/4 npt
not sure where exactly it could be from
Thanks. I'm thinking maybe hydraulic. Is there anything that I could look for that might be a clue?
If it had one of those part labels I'd be able to locate it down to a specific sector (that little QR on part tags has sector numbers) but this evidently doesn't have that
Yeah doesn't seem to.
why is the hsr so shiny
metal
that reminds me of that one saturn 5 staging video
Yeees
the sun...
Big if true
oh you mean thats the shadow of the sun and not a reflection of the earth
makes sense
re hls demo in 2025,
That seems like someone said by the end of FY25 which was the plan a while ago and sudoer (massive asshole) is now pushing it as factual
Where is this from
Andrew is cool
Yeah I mean sudoer says this but also strongly dislikes saying where he gets info, so unless he tells then I’m assuming he pulled it out of his ass
rectal sourcing
I mean it makes sense cuz all he says is shit and that's where it comes from
Lmao
Hot stage separation and the beginning of Super Heavy boostback burn on Starship's sixth flight test
After a successful landing and splashdown in the Gulf of Mexico, Booster 13 experienced a RUD.
However, the aft end still appears to be intact.
Omg
boat
i cant belive sudoer is our source 💀
Yeah and now I wouldn’t be surprised if his account gets terminated 💀
He posted something he probably wasn’t supposed to
oh shit the tweet is already deleted
Something something
therefore elon cant run a successful business
Lmfao
Good thing I saved the image
I could see this happening from Star base, but a single launch only, like, only to orbit
Maybe a single refuel demonstration
But it wouldn't be September
Closer to November -december
Cause don't they have an active newer HLS mockup at Star base?
Like people have gone to tour inside?
I would believe that they are targeting September internally. I would not believe anyone actually believes they're doing that then
read upchat
Oh lmfao
💀
Mb
Saved to like every starship related discord server now tho lmao
see that's what happens when you give an idiot confidential information
wau
307
Wonder if that guy also has S31 floating videos
We are closer to the launch of the HLS demo than the first starship flight
Ooo s31 floating vid?
Omg
mine is 983 kB 🤔
Think it's still out there floating?
something's alive in the ocean
Would be cool if they recovered it
Omg
holy fucking shit
Where's that from
Nice man on TikTok decided to share them all
That's awesome
Sonic boom
I can't even recognize those debris
Tank section with chines
The one sinking is crazy
Funny seeing it so weak and just sinking then hitting the ground
its to stop spacex getting on at them
if spacex make the TFRs higher or anything because RGV isnt being professional and stuff like that being shared then flyovers would get extremely extremely difficult
thats what they say
YOOOOOO
According to the boat captain on the salvage operation:
"I shot it till it sank. It was floating to Mexico. Couldn't let that happen. "
LMFAO
who's gonna listen him
like what he gonna do
X is a FREE SPEECH app 🦅 🇺🇸 🦅 🇺🇸 🦅 🇺🇸 🦅 🇺🇸 🦅 🇺🇸 🦅 🇺🇸
also seems like sudoer left the server? can't find him by @
Streisand Effect time
Of all the people
I think he accidentally fell out of a window of the server
yay
Lmfao he’s cooked and he knows it
or alternatively fell down the stairs.
tries to act like he didn't do anything bad and does only good 
According to the boat captain on the salvage operation:
"I shot it till it sank. It was floating to Mexico. Couldn't let that happen. "
Found the videos on a different server
theyre on all the servers, except rgv
oh wait
I FUCKING CALLED IT
buttfucking Jesus?
@tidal glen @coarse sonnet
what happened
Booster sinking footage got leaked by Sudoer
and someone on tiktok
Yea I think it was just the guy and sudoer happened to find it
Salvage captain apparently shot at the booster until it sank to avoid it floating into Mexico
fair
thats wild
funny how you have the same response to booster scuttling and inappropriate things
fuck you im leaking this cool ass mothafucking video of a massive steel booster sinking in literal seconds
Wait so that peice that's sinking is the aft of the booster???
i just realised its in two pieces at that point
aand deleted
lol lmao
LOX tank
methane tank literally shit itself
into dozens of pieces
there is a weird resistance in the space "media" circle to leaked content and such
getting people to tell you and show you things you shouldn't see is like, half of journalism
are the prominent space commentators being hedonist when they discourage the sharing of leaked content
especially funny when tzero is industry lol
"only i should have the privilege of seeing leaked footage"
i think it's also kind of emblematic of the access journalism you see a lot in the musk circle
everyone wants to stay on the good side of elon but at the same time, yeah no if you found something out via sources (nevermind by some tech's incompetence posting to tiktok) that's all fair and square
that said yea source protection is usually a good idea if you want to keep that access
but this reads much more like sudoer suddenly panicking that he did something good ol elon might not love
It's not just space, it's something that I see more widely on internet communities
let’s be real if elon got that footage first he would be twitching trying not to release the footage himself
Proud to say that i've already leaked space stuff
It's my go-to response
like i've leaked shit in a lot of my writing. most of the good journalists i know do, but it's one of those things you also have to personally do the work to vet and caveat as necessary
also not dramatizing helps
Also this seems pretty harmless it's just the booster floating in water and sinking it's not like raptor injector plates or something
i like how injector plates are always used as the example of a well kept secret
there aren’t many really
what the FUCK did lavie just ADMIT she LEAKED stuff!! i’m reading this info to every space server to exist!!
If you had like a good photo of the Raptor injector then yea that's probably at least some level of intruguing but for the most part yeah no
It's just one of those things that gets thrown around as "omg itar!!!"
Which also leaking that would be the fault of whoever had direct contact with it, not media as long as they could establish separation
I was given the example of TVC actuators as something SpaceX tries to keep under wraps and quiet but they seemingly aren’t very good at that either
Same vibes
drake!
tse leak
Oh look it’s me
that is 100% what it was btw
also I just wanna put this out there, the og DM screenshots had the guy's name in it
so that's probably one of the reasons that the OG source took them down
this is really funny
idk man if you're gonna go out there yourself snooping on shit and also regularly try to leak info from tours and such with zero attempt at protecting your sources
i don't know that you get to start pearl clutching about tHe LeAkS
if you're gonna go out there yourself snooping on shit
do you know more than i do
eh, the boats ™️ are close enough, and the average media operation at starbase is already indistinguishable from professional industrial espionage anyway
He needs validation, and he’s not getting it this time. That’s why he’s mad

damn oliver salty
always is
True and I think the leaked pictures are more then enough footage we need of B13 after splashdown
the starbase twittersphere seems to be a shouting contest of "look how much i know" from people with zero actual intuitive knowledge of how anything they're looking at works
lavie i love these journalistic insights, keep it coming
and like, it's okay to not know these things - but seeing everyone try to brand themselves as the expert on starship with all the spicy info nobody else has will lead to shit like this lol
I just met you and holy you are very based
You have my respect
Yeah
lmao i try my best. just shit you see leading both a media op and doing comms work in the industry
Cool
They have spoken with spacex about there camera locations and told it was all good. They also don’t put anything on the dunes or mudflats
Fair enough then
And yea ignoring that last sentence as most outlets have their own land in the area
Lmfao how is it still afloat, B13 refueses to die
Two things to this. A, mildly ironic posting an email intended to not be public under a post about not leaking information on his part. B, IGW is not a part of SpaceX's media program
We still comply with that though
We've worked in coordination with them over such things but we are not a part of their media roster
I’m not sure it really matters if you’re credentialed media or not when that’s an FWS ruling lol
,
I just want to make it clear we are not a part of their media pool so we are not restricted to only SpaceX property
Pretty much everything we do that many seem to deem as risky or something we clear that with SpaceX first...eg, the camera placement, the whole ridgewind thing, among a few other future and/or ongoing projects
Everythings in line
future projects 👀
Yeah, but as to your other two points, neither of these really matters when all that’s being quoted is a FWS rule lol. I would probably be slightly more careful about the direct wording if I were sharing it
Also, nothing about that says don’t set cameras off SpaceX property
It just says don’t piss off the FWS by setting it on their property
As to the rest of it there is nothing illegal about what IGW is doing (assuming you are compliant with the FWS), but there is also nothing illegal about as media publishing info that was given to you you would not otherwise be privy to (even if the person who gave you it broke an NDA)
My problem isn’t entirely what y’all are doing, though I will say the pretty… cavalier ops and the amount of money suddenly poured into it definitely raises the sus meter a little bit. So forgive me if that doesn’t immediately pass the sniff test. But I do think the pearl clutching about “leaks bad :(“ is pretty antithetical to being a journalist
You are welcome to not used leaked material. Just… maybe don’t try to claim a moral high ground for it, ya know
Once again we comply with it
I totally understand that and I do kind of share that thought. I'm not in charge of social media so I have no control over what Joey posts I think he was kind of just echoing what I've been saying throughout today. I dunno for sure though
(just got into a meeting so can’t respond)
What's going on 
Such a sick shot
Insane accuracy
That's a very scorched Ship
Slightly
goodbye chat
you know what happens now
so so clean
Holy sheeit
is it broken
yes
wow
I think its different cause its the FWS
Once again we comply with FWS regulations
But it says in that letter not to place cams in dunes or mudflats
yet you did
Something about IG is fishy to me tho
Except we don't
There are multiple places you can feel free to go look at in the EPA but there is very specific information about what areas are defined as each
None of our cameras are in those legally defined areas
I just watched your last video, im not stupid like you make me seem
I never said that whatsoever
If you joined this server just to start drama in another place please leave
That ain't a question that's an attempt at an insult. If you have questions then ask them without trying to go all accusatory
Do you have a map of the legally defined areas, as well as your cam locations?
Am curious
I could take your word for it but eh
...
Silence here speaks volumes
Chillax it takes a few minutes to search hundreds of pages of PDFs
lol okay
More images of Starship Flight 6 as seen from the International Space Station have just been released!
ISS072-E-218659: T+2:04
ISS072-E-218660: T+2:33 (just before hotstaging)
ISS072-E-218661: T+3:34 (boostback burn shutdown)
Check them out here! https://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/SearchPhotos/ShowQueryResults-Table.pl?results=Latest_ISS_Imagery
I mean this isn’t necessarily intentional. It’s just that TVCAs are typically packaged in a manner which is less visible, especially after a full dress out. They’re just usually less visible
Page 118
Page 123
https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/2022-06/PEA_for_SpaceX_Starship_Super_Heavy_at_Boca_Chica_FINAL.pdf
Page 51
Page 66
Page 308
Page 321
Page 329
Page 322
https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/2022-06/AppendixD_EndangeredSpeciesActSection7Consultation.pdf
Page 2
https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/2022-06/Appendix_H_Jurisdictional_Wetland_Determination.pdf
We don't have a map of cameras for Flight 6 but we do for Flight 5. 6 used the same locations only with PTZ2 and two gopros moved, five less gopros in total.
All camera locations that aren't contained within the boundaries of the PDFs listed above are just the roadside cameras...which are, you know, on the road.
Additionally we had Jordan out with us during camera placement and camera retrieval and he approved of every single location right there in person (the two on the island in the center of the frame were moved further west than shown in the map)
Jordan?
Guy talking about it just might have been wrong about how sensitive they really are tbh
Spacex environmental director
Cool
Huh didn’t know that
Yeah I mean I can see why a cutaway version or disassembled version would be very problematic. But actuators aren’t major trade secrets. You’re not going to know how to build one by looking at it
This has been floating around for two years https://vxtwitter.com/StarshipGazer/status/1605973237648592900
Lots of Raptor 2 engines in tent 1 yesterday with the new electric thrust vector control hardware.
12/21/22
https://www.starshipgazer.com/
https://www.patreon.com/StarshipGazer https://t.co/ADnl5Gkx6J
They show plenty of closeups of the actuators in their own videos those aren't an issue externally
I haven't seen any of the videos for a while. But yeah, I don't see why external views would be an issue
So real quick just so we can make this clear, does this answer your question?
It's worth noting SpaceX has much more property around there than the one for the launch site
I'm aware that's just the primary pad site
Yeah I just note this cuz there's been some folks out there not knowing this putting cameras in SpaceX's lots and then got the tap on the shoulder
Totally yep
Shots are actually really good https://youtu.be/zGjQTYG4840?si=lrnBfOt0LfcNB-u2
For Starship/Super-Heavy's sixth flight test, We returned to Starbase, Texas to destroy more cameras and push the envelope...so you wouldn't have to.
Watch Starship/Superheavy launch up close in 4K HDR!
This mission was a unique one for us. Our first at Starbase, running a hybrid launch pad camera setup, introducing multiple High-end Mirrorle...
Bobber McBobberface :
Yes thank you
very good explanation, I just hope that other people who arent as educated can follow the rules
True that....unfortunately there's a whole lotta idiots. It was like a madhouse over in the flats during setup
Some guy walked over the property line going closer to the vehicle. Drone approached said guy. Said guy proceeded to flip the drone off
this is why we can’t have nice things✨
i HATE anyone who acts like that so much
ruins it for everyone else
Mhm
much like everyone who decided it was a good idea to spread those leaked videos further
You see it's all a big circle here
when I'm in a brainless competition and my opponent is michael paul
once someone posts it on twitter there’s not much of a difference whether it’s spread around or not tbf
For once it wasn't michael paul
he posted them too
I did manage to get sudoer to delete it within a few minutes but yeah it was far too late. But that was just the video of it at night. The other 4 were found by others so it wasn't just a one person thing
He wasn't the epicenter though
was it people posting things they were told not to post or was it employees being stupid
both
He's a pretty big pain in the ass aftershock though
Yeaa
It's a whole mess so basically some guy who was on it sent it to a friend on facebook, (messages below) said facebook recipient posted it publicly. recipient's wife saw that and posted it on tiktok, which a few hours later sudoer found, in which case he posted that to twitter making everyone aware of it. this might be the first time in history a game of telephone has worked without any information being dropped
all of this is now wiped by the way the facebook posts gone the tiktok account deleted
so yes both
the responsible thing to do would be to message the tiktok account and say how dumb it is to post it and save the guy his job but uh
sudoer doing sudoer things
Oh they used the Shoot It With Big Guns approach to sink it?
I still find that hilarious. It is the most American/Texan thing ever.
Do they shoot it with normal guns or a standard industry "remote hole applicator device" which is almost exactly a gun
ah okay yeah i can see how this was sudoers fault lol
What kind of gun did they use?
I know personally, I would want to use an M107A1, firing incendiary (explosive) ammo.
Big caliber gun attached to the boat
Just like at the Cape
You should see the babies they have inside Doug and Bob to sink Falcons
Sink Falcons?!
Do we have pictures of these babies?
Pics?
Yeah so far that's what SpaceX launches from the Cape
It's r-word unfortunately
Redacted?
ye
Do you at last know the type?
i'd imagine that since the booster's exterior has the general integrity of a couple dozen layers of tin foil, you wouldn't need much more than five M16A4s and a lot of 7.62 ammo
Ye it’s a weird one
Does seem to be the same though
i dont see why they wouldnt be the same engine
both of them quite clearly say 387 to me
Wonder how many of B13's raptors were taken from B12
I’m surprised they wouldn’t say anything about it on the webcast
Or even mention it on Twitter
that doesnt really serve as any evidence against them reusing engines
spacex are known to not release stuff
there were a significant number of RBs (and presumably RCs too) removed from B12, though theres a few spotted remaining on it so most probably went to mcgregor
im thinking 3 or so engines got reflown
https://x.com/spacerhin0/status/1860300211542806800?s=46
https://x.com/spacerhin0/status/1860300214378041499?s=46
Now the main thing that's made me unsure about this is that SpaceX didn't mention that they were reflying an engine. This is unusual as you would expect there to be a big deal about "being on the way to rapid reusability".
I love watching people figure this shit out in real time
I mean it literally looks like 307
it also looks significantly more flown than the other engines lol
if anything they both look like 307
also uh
they did refly an engine
just not sure if it's this one
they reflew at least 2
387 and 314?
High-speed internet for when you’re flying through space or coming in for a landing on the other side of the world
an image and a video
Pixel analysis reveals that there is a curve in (
@BocasBrain ITAR police are surrounding your house right now. Hide in the basement, grab your PS5 and RUN 🏃♂️
so this image is basically ITAR too 
The beauty and fury of humanity's adventure to space
patch png
they could have at least put it in a hexagon
hexa-bros 
(no offence)
I ordered one for me and one for the relative who went with me...
It was cheaper to buy them separately.
Because shipping
Where's it actually from? Seems more like an emulation than the actual original image
SpaceXNow - Stay informed with the latest SpaceX news, launches, and statistics.
M16s fire 5.56x45
so it's just a recreation
Yes, but it's better than nothing
that thing looks charred as hell holy shit
re; it's 367, not 387.
now people will believe that a raptor wasn't reflown on B13...
You're saying it was?
(it wasn't)
LMAO
yea
oh they weren’t kidding https://fixupx.com/CSI_Starbase/status/1860520765696692557
Now that I've finally had a chance to go back and look at this for myself...
Here is the video clip from @Erdayastronaut's livestream appearing to show large caliber rounds impacting Booster 13's aft section. These may be 20mm or 50 cal rounds fired from the boat on the left side of the screen.
Great catch by @RyanHansenSpace!!
Quoting Ryan H...
Lol tf??!!
Ra Ra B13, SpaceX's favorite space machine
Are people really surprised they shot at the booster when the PEA from 2022 already contemplated this possibility?
Not to mention they do the exact same thing to Falcon 9
that probably makes recovery a lot more difficult if they keep shooting their boosters
It's just an American recovery
They shot at a F9 Block 3/4 booster in the Atlantic in February 2018 (SES-16/Govsat-1) after it accidentally floated on an expendable booster mission that somehow still makes a landing burn
Block 3
☝️
goes hard
Godspeed🫡
Quoting Austin Barnard🚀 (@austinbarnard45)
Imagine being a pirate and seeing this, my god
is austin barnard related to joe barnard and why is he leaking
He’s not leaking and no they’re not lmao
austin barnard used to work on the booster team
he installed the camera on B12 that has the gridfin shot
works at BO now
damn
Ye he don’t plan on retuning to spacex so he ain’t gotta worry about damaging relations
we dont know that
how is it not leaking if its damaging relations
hes still under NDA
and he only left spacex to finish college
he could easily return when hes done
He’s said quite a lot he loves it at blue and has said he don’t plan on going back atm
spacex fosters an unhealthy work-life balance
It's not surprising, but it is hilarious
Is that the forward section
Or the aft because there's video of the aft floating at night
that's the one with engines (aft if I get it correctly)
aft ye
Enjoy this incredible audio and video from around the launch pad of the 6th full stack flight test of Starship, featuring a Super Heavy Booster aborted catch in late afternoon lighting!!! 4K slow motion captured on various cameras including ZCam, Freefly Ember, BlackMagic 12K Ursa, and RED Komodo X with SIGMA lenses and Meade Telescopes.
SpaceX...
Why does it stop suddenly right before fully submerging? Did it hit the ocean floor? The Gulf is pretty deep so I doubt it
It was quite close to shore, relatively speaking.
”relatively quite close to the shore”
why the black shadow around the plume
Photoshop because the Earth is actually flat
(dark side of the cloud I think)
(it's angled a little weird tho I agree)
likely just an artifact of any contrast boosting image processing
S31 can be reused
wonder if they could just... use steering thrusters near the top to slow it down as it tumbles into the water and then that can be its emergency landing mode
I keep seeing ppl who thinks banana on Flight 6 was real/biological (not stuffed/plastic)

i am one of them 

ripe banana stem isn't so tough that you can just tie it up and expect it to survive all those vibrations
plus the bay is not pressurized right? the outgassing would need to be considered. wait a minute...
if it's not pressurized... it has to withstand compression as it's coming in
also, outgassed bananas would be an excellent novelty food
idk if people know this but bananas become bruised when they are too cold
so it would have probably darkened in a matter of seconds
is it cold in the payload bay?
well frankly i hypothesise the banana would keep its temperature quite well because the only way in which the heat is dissipated is through radiation, which is slow
but i wonder what the temperature in the payload bay would be at liftoff with the sun heating heating up the ship and the propellant cooling down the ship
It wasn’t even a real banana
~~why is it called heating when the sun heat heat up the ship heat down out the banana ~~
I didn’t know if it was real or not but the evidence saying it’s not is pretty convincing
then yeah it didn't become bruised
"first biological payload" my ass
oh really? I missed that then oop
Because I thought it was real too and then I rewatched the webcast and they said it was a plush
I mean I’m pretty sure anyway, maybe would be a good idea to fact check me
I don't think it matters because rockets pass the Karman line in 3 minutes so the temperature would have dropped very rapidly
why do you think it is cold in space
in LEO at least
on the surface of celestial bodies yeah no
it is cold but if you are facing the sun that's when it isn't pretty much
It’s <the concept of ambient temperature is not useful here> in space
But inside starship it might be pretty chilly at first what with all the cryogens nearby
and during reentry it was probably very hot
Haven’t seen this tracking before, it’s really good https://youtu.be/KBssNyjZeE0?si=LJ9j7-QHSAmxTJR9
Full Launch video - minor edits.
Shot from Raptors Roost in Boca Chica, TX
undefined degrees
without a source of heat, space is very very cold
Isn't that just a freeze-dried banana?
Dinosaurs
it would be shriveled up and dark brown from the cold
not your typical frozen banana
But vacuum
well sure but the idea of “hot” and “cold” really stop working the way you’d think they would
all heat transfer is either conductive by direct contact or radiative
which others have said, but yeah it’d be probably not cooling down real fast
a real banana might explode tho (if not vented)
banana vented
Banana vent
T+4 banana vent
how do you vent it? stab it with a fork?😭😭
or a skewer
ehh I don't think it would have exploded
the peel is more permeable than you might think it's not an air tight seal for the contents inside
it would've just gotten brown and maybe smaller
yeah but we’re also talking peak depress rates (if controlled properly> around 0.1psi/sec
if uncontrolled peak can be much higher
i mean you can always throw one in a vacuum chamber and find out
it also might just uneventfully come open
would you have to worry about water boil off?
In this video, an experiment was conducted to check how vacuum will influence the banana.
Over the years I've freeze dried a lot of things, and now, I want to see what it does to a banana.
#shorts
(this last one doesn't have a peel)
always neat to find out someone did that
so does that mean... we don't need pressurized space suits anymore? just have temperature regulation and we're all good!
assuming a human is interchangeable with a banana in a vacuum
anyone got a human in a a vacuum videos? 
since there is so much debate about what exactly would kill a human in space and how fast it would happen, i have a suggestion
Let's find out
i ask for one (1) brave volunteer from the audience
@ashen lynx said he wants to volunteer
mememememememeeeeee!
I would be ok with this
Scott Manley said "IFT-6"
based
Lots of updates for the second half of November, multiple SpaceX launches, including IFT-6. China debuts the Long March 12. SpaceX gets a critical contract to deliver the Dragonfly mission to Titan. And Blue Origin puts New Glenn Vertical.
Follow me on Twitter for more updates:
https://twitter.com/DJSnM
I have a discord server where I regularl...
Yeah it pisses me off
#1025438364775747584 message
He knows it’s wrong
Yeah i love the guys content and everything but his recent stuff has noticeably been lacking
oh no he said a phrase
does this mean I should be mad at people who call MR-3 "Freedom 7"
I really don't care lol
I just knew it would drive some people crazy
it is such a non-issue though
does that really matter
like
at all
well of course you'd descend from Mt Sinai and say as much
This
Yes
FLT as an abbreviation is also acceptable

IFT
No

SOFT
All systems and weather are go for the second integrated flight test of Starship. Today's webcast will go live ~35 minutes ahead of liftoff → https://t.co/bJFjLCiTbK
Weather is 70% favorable for today’s third integrated flight test of Starship.
The live webcast will begin ~30 minutes before liftoff, which is currently targeted for 7:30 a.m. CT → https://t.co/G1H8uoTxWD
huh
integrated flight test is a perfectly fine name for the early starship quasi orbital launches, interchangeable with flight test
being long name, they can be abbreviated as IFT or FT
ohh yea they stopped after 3rd
https://spacenews.com/spacex-sets-early-june-launch-of-next-starship-test-flight/
https://aviationweek.com/taxonomy/term/158851
Reputed news also say Integrated flight test for the 4th and 5th Superheavy launch
why are we even fighting about this of all things
so while Flight test is prefered for these launches, Integrated flight test is also used
someone needs to ask elon or gwynne or jared at this point
or someone important idk
I meeean NXF uses different mission names even for F9s
So what's the deal with Starships
As long as everyone understands it's a 5th flight, it's fine 
It's not like Starlink Mission #210 and Starlink Group 6-65
we should just call it "the sixth time the thing did the thing" then
unironically
The 6th doohikey
people within the company call it different names what exactly makes you think an outside news article would be definitive
- Source matter, an article from a famous journal is a more quotable source
- Language is malleable, if it is widely reported as a name then it becomes a viable name
also internal names kinda don't matter?
lots of companies have internal naming for various thing which is entirely irrelevant to anyone outside, the PR is what matters
the 6th doohikey took off, and the thingamabob performed a offshore divert instead of being caught by the whatchamacallit
the "internal" name is literally just designated as flight. There's no acronym there. it's a word. it's correct

ok but as I said internal name don't matter
the word flight is irrelevant? even though that's literally what they call the damn thing publicly too?
SX calls one way for 1-3, and other articles call it another way for 1-3, SX calls it another way for 4-5, articles call it one way for 4-5 , both are semantically correct, both are correct, both are interchangeable
IFT=FT
you're going on about only using the public PR name but they've literally never said IFT. integrated flight test, sure, on flights 1 and 3, but never the acronym
why do you care so much
what matters for our purposes is that both of them can be called both names equally as validly
integrated flight test = IFT = FT = Flight test
Acronyms obviously are a shortening
so what's wrong with FLT then?
they call them flights
it's not an acronym it's an abbreviation
FLT is a bit weirder
two different things
y'all are still on this?
call it whatever you want
yeah for some reason
just saying that it all means the same thing
god it's not that deep lol
just call it something, as long as everyone understands what you're referring to does it actually matter?
yeah
IFT is instantly recognisible in the entire spaceflight community
Flight or Flight test already needs a bit more context, or you then have to use Starship flight test
as it is right now in written form IFT is the shortest way to unambiguously name starship flights
love how you say yeah but then continue trying to justify it somehow
Literally the same like Starlink Group 12-1 and Starlink 12-1
Yes, i agree with haylee and continue their point
everybody understands it!
Integrated Death Test 6
Can't wait for IFT-7. 
(tbh I don't care much about what it's called, I just think it's funny when people get worked up about it)
I wonder what the chances are SpaceX does another naming change and it becomes F<number>
The IFTs will continue until morale improves
(the people yearn for another STS-like designator)
IFT-243 launching Starlink V3.5 satellites to orbit from LC-39Ab 
It would fall perfectly in line with SpaceX's inconsistent naming schemes and the evolution of the starship, booster, (and raptor?) serial numbers to have just one letter at the start.
Wait the raptors have multiple letters bc variants
When IFT-56 lands on the moon I will make sure to remind that one guy that threw a fit on Twitter about it
What actually pisses me off is that he called CZ-12 a "Falcon 9 clone"
Out of all the Chinese F9 copies CZ-12 is the least similar
You actually got me surprised I thought they was launching the next one lmfao
Idk why
💀
💀
Starship jumpscare
IFT until it launches actual payloads (not pathfinders or dummy or tests) then SF (ship flight) and SHF (superheavy flight) (different bc on some missions the ship will launch more than once (and without the booster) (see artemis/future mars missions where it lands, then re-launches) )
Wut
I swear a lot of people will be very disappointed when Starship is on the 3000th flight and it's still doing test flights lol
I'd recommend having a way wider view of the program than "oh it's still a test and it's not carrying and '''actual''' payload, therefore this flight doesn't make Starship '''really''' '''''operational''''' so therefore I'm gonna make up my super duper extra special nomenclature for this"
Michael once in the day made the variants of Starship in a very similar sense on the app and I've gotten rid of most of it cause I think it's very constraining and silly imo. He had still the full stack flights marked as "prototype" and I'm like well yeah, we'll probably be in Ship 400 and Booster 230 and those might still be considered a "prototype" under whatever made up rule one wants to come up with
So I changed that, because it's dumb

are these not flight tests though? once they're doing commercial missions like launching satellites or things like that (after the first sat launch ofc) then itd be a normal flight
unless you count a foam banana as an actual payload
Those will still be test flights
The same way the space shuttle was still an experimental test vehicle after 135 flights. Because Starship is not your rinky dinky Atlas, Vulcan, or Titan rocket, it's a completely new and experimental vehicle
okay sure the shuttle might have technically been an "experimental test vehicle" but did anyone actually refer to it as such?
Trying to carry over this sort of "baggage" of how to name a program and a rocket operational or not depending on whether it launches a payload or not is completely flawed in my opinion
Ask the CAIB
One of the results from that investigation was that NASA should have never called it off as operational after four flights. That it was a highly experimental and risky test vehicle and it should have been treated as such.
falcon 9 was a completely new vehicle style as well, launch a stage into space and vertically land
Which is proving my point because we didn't need stupid special nomenclatures for flights that were considered "tests"
Like the first flight didn't carry any payloads and it's just Falcon 9 Flight 1
It carry a dummy Dragon on top to simulate aerodynamics and that's it
what about falcon heavy?
Falcon Heavy Demo Flight?
it carried a dummy payload and was called a test mission, then when it carried actual payloads those werent tests
according to SpaceX "Falcon Heavy Test Flight"
Yeah
So you agree then that probably if it had kept being tested for six flights in a row and had been launching dummy payloads all the time, SpaceX would have called it "Falcon Heavy's sixth test flight" am I right?
Because...
yes, because those would be test flights
Right
what purpose do these current flights have?
to test stages of flights and reentry
and recovery
As well as building up experience launching Starship which they had none of it just a year and a half ago
As SpaceX says "the payload is data" or some stuff like that
once the primary purpose is to launch payload, it will not be a test flight
Okay so flight 8 it is then
Which coincidentally is the first flight into orbit and the first ship catch. But that's not a test flight
i wouldnt say launching payload is the sole primary purpose, the test of the ship catch and orbital insertion is also a primary purpose
See now we're moving the goalposts 😅
Now it's not just enough that it is launching a payload
Because there's more stuff
once none of the purposes of a flight is to test launch, reentry, or landing, then it will be a normal flight
So it'll keep being a "non normal flight" for hundreds of flights then
By the way does in space prop refilling count too in the list of things that doesn't make it a "normal flight"? I ask just to add it to the list of extra things on top of "it needs to launch a payload"
id say that the launch phase, hotstaging, boostback burn and ship reentry and landing are all "flight proven"
once they start prop refillings, those will be "prop refill tests", not "test flights" because that is in-mission, whereas the first manned one will be a manned test flight
once that is proven then those will just be normal segments of flight
SN1
IFT1
Number 1 <---- ????
Flight 1
IFT is more consistent with SN
as for normal flight hmm
we need an acronym for that when the time comes
I mean we could do the sane thing that everyone does and call it by the payload name lol
or starship flight # and superheavy flight #
(so a launch after say, the first lunar landing + return, might be starship flight 152 superheavy flight 151 (or Flight 152:151)
Is it so hard to just call it flight like oh my goodness why are we dying on this hill it's the only one that makes sense for both phases and it's actually used
because the ship and booster will have differing numbers of launches
Then call them UNINTEGRATED flights
