#Starship Flight Test 3
3942 messages · Page 4 of 4 (latest)
anyway
rotisserie starship
The Jebidiah Kerbin was a trooper. He was with us till the end
I think a lack of control at some point?
here or snap
Or maybe a passive thermal demo
insta*
My guess was LOC at SECO
real
yeahđ
official call now is loss of vehicle
personally i donât think the spinning was supposed to occur during reentry
confirmed
RIP S28
well uh
insta
Seems suboptimal
i donât think it helped cool it down like expected 
đ
over
ye my leading theory
wdym it was obviously intended!!
cooking the ship like kebab
hmmm space baked stainless steel
Right nerds bets on when Flight 4 will be
yesterday
May-July
In 3 hours
tommorow
Assuming pad is ok? April
my birthday :)
The confetti gif đ
Iâm was going to say June so that works 
please please pretty please do it while max is here
tomorrow at 9
No chance
So we calling this one a success?
Yes
100% sticking with late April / early May
MARACAS ELON
oh fuck it is pie day
I cannot see it being next month
Why
SpaceX logo on Dan's pie lol
S29 and B11 are gonna be tested over the next three weeks and the hardware will be ready for a 4/20 WDR
THEY ALL HAVE PIE LOL
Too soon. SpaceX might be ready but the FAA wonât
i mean the backup times are there for tomorrow so
They had pies that whole time???
Didn't FAA give them permission for more flights after this
man whats with these dates they are launching on
This will trigger a new mishap investigation
It made it a lot further than I thought it would
Faa moment
next launch May 4th, or April 1st
Can we talk bout that reentry footage
I dunno
Partial failure 
Yes FAA doing their jobs is a big FAA moment
thats shit was crazy
big 50 million $ paycheck to the program#
may 4th seems possible
So we can expect another failure investigation right? Because not all mission requirements were met right?
idk man that seems very reasonable
just let boeing do it already smh
Feed me spacex
Yes the FAA will have launched a new mishap investigation by the end of the day
Yeah, the license covered launch + reentry
FAA needs to ensure safety, part of that is investigating failed launches
So is it dead?
Very dead
Yep
Cool
NO
its joined ift-1 and 2
it landed at my house
Ye I mean re-entry part
well all parts of the launch were within safety parameters so
Do you reckon they'll get any data physically recovered? Do they have a black box
i get to keep it now
Lol no
Hopefully less time for license this time since it seems less to fix
i was hoping
Good to see all engines fired as expected with none shutting down unexpectedly
well if they did itâs in the black (ocean floor)
It would be amazing if we got recorded reentry footage
bruhhh
except the ones that didnât
space 
they should have thrown a pie onboard for good luck
Congrats SeX
well, i meant that there were no rock tornadoes or chunks landing around the caribbean
I really woke up at 5am to listen to jazz for an hour
IS THAT THE STARLINK DOOR
It was all on stream, RUD likely happened when they lost camera + data
i love how they launched an SHLV but couldnât have the door not be stuck
like bruhđđ
Yoooo
lmfao
Yeah that door looked so flimsy
I had to wake up at 4am to watch the most powerful rocket succeed
low bar lmao
is the landing marked as a failure
still, should mean less things to fix
You think it rudded? Reentry break up seems to be a slow process if you look at Colombia
launch site open
its a SUD
i mean, the plasma mightve gotten in through the broken door
holy shit r process s process
and begun a fire inside
They confirmed the door shut?
it was ocillating during plasma
thought it fell off?
Yup
What's wack is that the plasma started the instant it hit the Karmen line
Wait did they do the in space raptor demo?
No
I mean it made it all the way through ascent which for NXF means a success
Damn
SpaceX themselves will of course have to do that, and I am sure FAA will still look into them anyway given the booster still crashed, the ship still burnt up and supposingly the ship would probably stay in orbit given they cancelled the Raptor relight
All very reasonable
They did prop transfer, payload bay door open/close but not relight
Do we know if the propellant transfer demo succeeded ?
think so yeah
whaddya wanna bet what caused the failure tirst
Full stop light
tiles or bbq
the computer reported it succeeded but they'll have to pick over the data to confirm
if succeeded then that means a big payday for the program
No. The flight computer sent telemetry confirming it had completed the actions but there is no confirmation the prop transfer was successful.
Ok
My biggest concern here is the apparent loss of attitude control and how early into the coast it began
agree yeah
Booster they'll figure out but nothing can happen in orbit until you get attitude control sorted on ship
I think so too yeah
The fact that the nose was oscillating randomly in large amplitudes and not locked to a particular attitude or following the flight path angle is a dead giveaway of LOC
always design your spacecraft with the assumption that it will lose attitude control immediately on deployment
that coast and reentry was very kerbal
any idea where the reentry was, i wodner if anyone got video of it
this is an interesting spherical trig problem wait
Me holding A and D trying to get the reaction wheels to orient me for reentry
Literally
That shit was doomed before plasma started
Can someone confirm this?
Edit: Confirmed, thank you.
I missed the first few minutes of the return of the commentators around T+40m.
Can someone confirm this?
Edit: Confirmed, thank you.
I missed the first few minutes of the return of the commentators around T+40m.
While there were lots of questions over whether heat shield would work, I think this was more an attitude control issue.

It gave out before plasma which sealed its fate
Sbin
I thought it was odd that it was still doing a bbq roll at 100km
any word on what the pieces were that were falling off? i dont think they were heatshields but im nt sure what else if that colour on it
tiles and ice
Congrats to @SpaceX on a successful test flight! Starship has soared into the heavens. Together, we are making great strides through Artemis to return humanity to the Moonâthen look onward to Mars.
Mostly ice
where were you when S28 is kill?
watching in class đ„Ž
take a guess when the launch was (it spiked way higher than this at liftoff, like 143bpm lol)
here
i was eating dorito wen phone ring
Lmao
oh I've been one-upped
seemed to be inactive đ„Ž
definitely not optimal
not a bbq apparently
lmaooo
now thats what iâd call mach fuck
sprint my beloved
Oops
Tiles defo came off so I think that the ship wouldâve burned even if the attitude control wasnât busted
Less tiles came off during ascent than last time but I still saw three or four visibly fly off
Also the bits that came off prior to reentry
Me vibing in the payload bay at 210km (I'm stuck and can't get out)
right I missed re entry and I've just scrolled thru the chat what the actual hell happened
was it spinning during re entry?
Watch this Timelapse, youâll see
literally a ksp starship
Disabled SAS
Congrats to @SpaceX on a successful test flight! Starship has soared into the heavens. Together, we are making great strides through Artemis to return humanity to the Moonâthen look onward to Mars.
Happy birthday to @SpaceX! What a day!
HUGE congratulations to the entire team for this incredible day: clean count (glad the shrimpers could get out in the nick of time!), liftoff, hot staging, Super Heavy boost back and coast (and likely a couple engines making mainstage during landing burn!), clean ship âinsertionâ and coast, payload door c...
BILLBILLBILLBILLBILLBILL
Are there any good pics from the launch yet?
There should be a few from NSF
pixel watch user!?!?!?!?
Looking for wallpaper material lol
some of the reentry shots would be good wallpaper material
what a picture that first one
Any videos of the booster hitting the water?
Fair
crunchy
Kinda sucks but it is what it is
I doubt thereâll be much footage of the Starship re-entry either
Maybe from South Africa/Mauritius?
There must be something, people got separation and that was further away
"I don't know about you, but we're feeling 22" -- @kate_tice getting in a Taylor Swift reference on a SpaceX livestream makes my day complete
Uhhh high res?
đđ
I donât have them sorry
Sucks
Spin stabilization, maintains a given pitch angle with higher efficiency. It didn't exceed critical angles during dangerous phases of reentry, so it should have been ok rolling like that
Classic example of a stable pitch angle
maybe there will be video
Its uncanny how easy it is
Maldives must have been close
is it daytime there tho
in the last frame it looks like theres plasma inside the door
Confirmation of mishap investigation
how long do you reckon this time?
Barely even a mishap
im thinking a bit shorter again now its caught the DoD's interest
The booster experienced a failure and the ship broke up, possibly after experiencing an extended period of loss of control. The mishap will probably be 3 months minimum, perhaps 5

"Help step booster, I'm stuck and I can't get out-"
nah man its game over 24 month investigation, starship cancelled, bill nelson in tears
idk if i can agree there đđ
0-60mph in 8 seconds
i think mishap is about the right word tbh
mishap but not failiure by any means
whereas the first flight woildve been closer to "misadventure"
Iâd really love to see the booster ram into the water
first flight wouldve been closer to âweeeeeeeeeeâ
yeah lmao, i'd say flight 1 and 3 were fairly successful, 2 was borderline tbh
"rock tornado"
smh I can easily do 3.5 here on earth
I mean
It slapped the ocean at Mach 0.9
Not a lot will be left from that
"crater in pad"
my expectations were so low for 1 i think
mfw launchpad conditions are literally compared to an erupting volcano in a published paper:
Maybe some wreckage will wash up on shore but only bits and pieces of metal
That reminds me
Gonna make a tier list for media coverage of this flight as they come up
Reutersâ own is already like an A-Tier so far
For a first it was nice yes, loved the impromptu trench that thing made
wait yeah it is
who needs to dig a trench manually when you can just launch a starship that is definitely going to die
but you just know that this is going to be spun the wrong way as it makes it down the funnel of general media
project plowshare:
Which is why the first articles are usually the best ones
indeed
Uh um⊠@Erdayastronaut đ€Ł
Reuters, AP, and (surprisingly) CNN usually make good Starship articles so I wonât be surprised about them
ngl i feel like part of the reason why science communication is hard is that the set of ideas communicable to the public in a headline is just not large enough to resolve nuance while preserving accuracy
there is a reason that technical language exists and that is to concisely express highly specific ideas about extremely complex things -- taking that away just removes our ability to do that
Very true
Iâve realized that most articles that people berate for being âmisleadingâ or âanti-SpaceXâ just have shitty headlines
yeah
The content itself is usually decent
Kinda why journalists (especially ones speaking on live tv) need to have sizable technical knowledge on spaceflight before they report on it
Using simplistic language just wonât work without being misinterpreted
One of these are not like the others
Spaceflight "journalists" don't have a sizable technical knowledge of what they report on.
Not even all the engineers working on a project have a good understanding of the entire system.
?
Spot the only person to not be cheerful đ
?
True, but I was more referring to reporters who donât usually make big reports involving spaceflight making basic errors when reporting on spaceflight
A certain Michael Baylor?
Mikhail
I think the biggest issue that the "community" has with mainstream reporting is that they don't spin things the same as places like Ars Technica
As someone who works on a large program that gets a decent amount of public reporting, no matter who is writing the article something is always wrong. Different places put different spins on it, that's just how news works.
I think thatâs it, yeah
Not every MSM article spins it in a negative light, but none spin it in an extremely positive light like a more niche-ish article would
If that makes sense
Yeah, changed it
Eric Berger is happy to put a positive spin on starship breaking up because his audience is made up primarily of enthusiasts who want to read a positive article
NBC doesn't give a shit. The rocket blew up so they'll say the rocket blew up and the average reader will say "oh another one blew up" and move on with their day
The mainstream media isn't trying to discredit SpaceX or whatever, they're just not putting the same "community" polish on it
mach fuck into the water isnât kind so
I think I see a girl in there somewhere
SpaceX successfully launched the third Starship test flight today, completing nearly all test objectives set for the mission.
đ NSF Store: https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/shop/
⥠Become a member of NASASpaceflight's channel for exclusive discord access, fast turnaround clips, and other exclusive benefits. Your support helps us continue our 24...
there was no landing so no
Womp womp
Also I'm amazed that once getting to flight operations, there were so few scrubs so far
Flight 1 had a scrub due to frozen pressurization valve on booster, then just some T-40 s hold before launching April 20
Flight 2 had a short T-40 s hold
Flight 3 had no holds
died 1969
born 2023
welcome back N1-L3 No. 05
yeah itâs crazy
lmaoooooo
Where digitized mission patch
LAHFSUJDGH
did we even get the SFT-2 one?
remember decembros
It's spinning so much
good post
It certainly appeared to be in an uncontrolled tumble
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/world-us-canada-68546912 where does this go would you say?
itâs true i guess?
i think that the updates were clearly made by someone who wanted to see the launch, rather than someone who was just given the basics of what happened and asked to write about it.
seeing starship in space is so surreal, ive only ever seen it in KSP or renders
just feels like KSP
but its not
its real
also the live views are genuinely insane
The BBC is so ass when it comes to stuff like this
The SpaceX team said it will take some time for them to understand exactly what happened.
Couldn't write something worse
It's almost like they want to fuel conspiracy theorists
well
at least they got the capitalization right
big milestone for them
Sky News are actually really decent
LOL true
thatâs a funny ass headline lmao
better than SPAC X VULCAN or w/e the FAA called it
Which?
Giant SpaceX rocket blasts off in most successful test launch yet
At least it's positive and true
I'd rather dumbed down words than straight up nonsense or misleading stuff
just makes me chuckle lmao
Yeah
from the BBC article
Sky News have got to be A too
CNBC was deeming it a full failure on its broadcast and called it the âheavy boosterâ
also not wrong
Trust Elon to post the lowest res photo possible to Twitter
was 29 rolled back?
yes
đđ
Fair
Confirmation that the onboard computer did not initiate raptor relight due to high roll rates. That confirms LoC without saying LoC
Booster also broke up before it hit the water at 460m altitude.
huh thats interesting
imagine if it actually SN11'd
or really thats just flight 2 boostback again
the plume did look very unsteady, but I wonder if it could also be aero forces? 1100 km/hr on the deck is not kind
With no information on the booster failure I'd have to imagine it's propulsion system related
UH
yeah, thatâs more likely
Similar to IFT-2? We'll see if they even publicly say
Also "initiated a propellant transfer demonstration" but careful to not say that it was successful
nooooo
That all throws a much different lens over this test than the initial takeaways I had this morning
"successfully lit several engines" đ
Probably fuel sloshing again - that booster was swinging WILD under that stratosphere upper level winds on the way down and there was little fuel left.
AFTS may have fired?
That is beautiful
I saw elsewhere that AFTS is typically safed during descent on F9, may be implemented similar here
"Results from these demonstrations will come after postflight data review is complete."
I think they are just careful evaluating since I imagine measuring cryogenic fuel transfer in microgravity is...an art
Don't think it was ever tried before like this (storable propellant, yes, not cryogenic ones)
Shouldnât be difficult Itâs not like itâs rocket science or anything 
yeah lol. Only had it for like two weeks, it was $100 so why not
I never really saw the appeal of having a smartwatch but now that I'm running around and frequently using contactless payments it's somewhat useful
Space Shuttle ECO sensors: 
(see the scrubs of STS-122 in late 2007 to know why)
Measuring the amount of propellant in a tank is very difficult on orbit. Measuring flow rates in a line is pretty trivial. I agree that it's not confirmation either way but I'd expect them to know the outcome of that test by the end of the day.
Knowing how telemetry is monitored on other programs I'd be surprised if that number wasn't displayed on console in real-time
yeah that makes sense because if it does nothing it wonât hit anything but if it detonated it would rain debris everywhere
remember when IFT-3 was supposed to be a tower catch
"On your screen we see the booster heading back to the launch pa-"
booster slams into OLM at mach 1
đ„
wonder how big the hole would be
I donât
What a launch
need engine bay cam
Me when I don't pay attention in my additude dynamics class
wdym
Failure due to loss of attitude control
And I'm currently taking a class on attitude lol
ahh gotcha
Real
I have a bad habit of making jokes using engineering language since like 2/3 of my friends are engineering students or engineers, lol. mb
You will understand our pain soon enough
I think it will just show a white hot hell
no lmao i just wasnât sure if you meant that it wasnât actually retrograde or not
i know was attitude dynamics is
@undone whale seems this is why there was no deorbit burn
well "deorbit"
Yeah - I did mention the rates were a bit high
How tf can you live thar close and have not even known anything was happening
Ooohh maybe that
@Marco_Langbroek Found this cloud trail in the Indian Ocean around the time it was reentring and near your predicted site. Could it be it?
Ok ok I figured you would I'm not crazy
Or rather, I am crazy but did not act like it in this one particular instance
oh?
Status on the pad yet?
watching SN8 rn
kinda crazy it didnât have any engine outs
the fact that spacex proposed tropics launch on this thing is so funny to me
looking at this, i doubt Earth-to-Earth is on the cards any more
It was never more than a fantasy
short of launching like 20-30km offshore
it was never really on them lmoa, short of maybe some super specialised military shit
or obviously moving starship hardware
It'll be used for moving hardware I'm sure
Albeit maybe not bc I'm sure a barge is a helluva lot cheaper
picture updated, super heavy lift launch vehicle launches (not counting FH) as of recent
I love that timeline we're living in
thatâs gonna be crazy
get boosters from west coast to east coast under their own power
as of recent
i started this powerpoint file (yes, powerpoint u read it right) after A1
i think i might include FH actually
actually nah

was Rvac cutoff supposed to happen that early?
I fell asleep halfway through re-entry did it survive?
lmao nope
Yep, if your rotation rates are high enough you wouldn't be able to settle propellant and might not be able to feed at all
It's very weird to me including falcon heavy on SHLV lists
Legitimately it's a MLV
realistically its an MLV
Oh we twinning
screw it im getting rid of FH
Work at the launch site continues
[ Credit: NSF Starbase Live ]
better
Whats cool is you can see the ship fyling off into space as the booster does its boostback burn
Yeah this was awesome
I had to do a double take when I saw plasma starting to form lmao
I was nodding off
i considered having this as my phone background
surely it would be a HLV
not SHLV
but isn't HLV 20t and above normally
yeh falcon 9 being HLV is uh
i mean it is, just
but its a HLV in the same was FH is a SHVL
HARD
technically it is, but i don't know of any launches where its launched over 20t
it is capable tho
It hasn't.
And I currently have the most up-to-date performance curves of Falcon Heavy fully expendable in my possession. It's not a SHLV
Falcon 9 is HLV when expended and Vulcan is an HLV in VC4 and up
oh whats FH payload capacity ?
I'd break my NDA if I publish numbers.
I have the mass capability that Falcon upper stage is qualified to down to the gram.
Off by a significant margin
The big thing is that the theoretically realizable mass capability is unachievable unless upper stage is fully resigned to qualify to a higher mass. And there are no payloads that have requested a new upper stage so it hasn't happened.
So why does SpaceX provide incorrect data?
Instead FH is used as a high energy variant of F9
probably becuase they could redesign the upper stage
if it were needed
The number on the SpaceX website is the theoretical capacity, not the actual capability of the vehicle
Oh that makes sense
its as capable as a rocket which can launch 63t, just with the issue that it can't hold something which is 63t
which is fine
as long as leo isn't what you're doing
In its current form it is not a SHLV, which is my entire point. Until you do it, it's just conjecture
It has a lower payload capability than SLS and Starship by an order of magnitude
i'm quite happy to agree with you
It's a high energy F9. And F9 carries the same mass constraint
does make sense
it is smaller
personally i dont really count it as a SHLV
doesn't seem like anyone here does tbh
not big enough
which is fair until they do that redesign, which like likely never will
with starship on the horizon there's no reason to
Credit to jof_reddy
I also doubt they'd ever do the redesign. Payloads that are over the mass limit could just launch on Vulcan or even New Glenn if they're truly that heavy, and by doing so you'd avoid having to pay SpaceX to develop an entirely new stage
I have a feeling a lot of starship launches in the future will have a kick stage of some kind
Like Helios
could well do, quite a lot won't simply because a lot will be for fuelling
or starlink
Starship will run into volume constraints until an expendable second stage is developed
Yeah but I feel it would be cheaper for someone contracting a starship to buy a separate kick stage than pay for multiple refueling
deep space missions could be flown on a starship with a fairly large kickstage
most likely, depends how spacex price it tbh
Refueling starship multiple times would only be good for sending it to Mars or the Moon
depends how successful starship is from a cost perspective as well
I donât think itâll ever get down to the $10 million that Mlon Eusk said it would once
Go SpaceX!
#SpaceX #SpaceXLaunch #StarshipLaunch #ElonMusk
If you guys are curious, the PPE and HALO portions of this 2022 GAO report state that the project is mass constrained by the Falcon Heavy mass limit
An ars technica article from the fall estimated the mass north of 18t
Alright I'm back from my comfort nap
So from what we know
IFT-3 was perfect all the way up to the boostback burn
B10 had some issues shutting down the Raptors during the boostback, and later failed to relight all of them before smacking into the GoM at Mach 0.899. It also appeared to have grid fin issues.
S28 got into its orbital coast, but seemed to have issues with the pez dispenser. The fuel transfer is said to have been initiated but not confirmed to have been successful.
There appeared to be attitude control issues, which became more apparent as re-entry began. This is likely the reason that the Raptors weren't relit for the deorbit burn.
Telemetry was available up until ~65 km, and S28 broke up not long after that.
Since the ship was spinning at the time the tiles can't be immediately blamed for the loss.
Yeah mostly because it is not flying in fully expendable configuration and I don't think SpaceX would be happy losing all three boosters anyways
Sides are going for ASDS landings on that one as far as I understand
So FH can't do the full push that it would in fully expendable configuration
Again, I have the performance capabilities for a fully expendable FH and it's not even in the same ballpark as the numbers on the website.
And the mass constraint is a physical limitation of falcon upper stage, not a function of whether or not you're expending boosters
Physical limitation?
Yes, it's a limit inherent to the design of the stage.
So when they launch the 17.5 tonnes of Starlink satellites plus dispenser there's no mass limitation?
Because I don't think I understand what you mean
17.5t is under the mass limit
So PPE and HALO are more massive than that is what you're saying?
Cause last time they mentioned mass numbers of those the two added up to about 14 tonnes
According to the GAO report I uploaded, PPE and HALO are heavy enough to where the mass limit is a mission constraint
And again, according to Ars Technica last year PPE + HALO is north of 18t
The same article says PPE+HALO will be the heaviest payload SpaceX has ever launched
Mmmmm
That's weird then since SpaceX themselves want to fly more Starlinks on F9 which would mean an even higher mass
I'm guessing they just don't think they'll achieve that recertification in time for PPE/HALO otherwise I don't see how it all comes together
Like to me the whole physical limit sounds like a thing it could be solved by upgrading the second stage for this flight and making it able to do that
Rather than trying to thin down the stack of modules
My understanding is that qualifying to a higher mass is not trivial and would likely require a redesign of major aspects of the stage. As I stated earlier.
can I have em
For sure. I'll email you them from prison
Weird that itâs ok to talk about those figures but only in riddles
idk if this was posted yet but i saw this in another server and just...
https://vxtwitter.com/INiallAnderson/status/1768333275511021863
"This could go wrong let me be clear." "If the mechanisms inside jam up that would be pretty embarrassing"
đ 31
đ
fine
Yeah it looks to be fine, less damage than after flight 2
it's a SHLV if they expend and build a beefier payload adapter and don't follow the russian definition
I already explained that it's not, the limit is on the upper stage, not the payload adapter, and it can't lift any more than Falcon 9 can in its current configuration
It's all proprietary information. I can talk about stuff that has already been confirmed publicly elsewhere but beyond that I have to be pretty careful
Itâs quite silly isnât it
100% agree
The data rights that SpaceX has been able to leverage should be illegal imo
Wish there was some way to make that happen but
<political ranting>
therefore we should kill them all

At least for my project, we will have to publish our launch mass eventually. And our insertion orbit has already been published, so you'll be able to confirm performance to a specific orbit (which is currently proprietary)
There's a lot about the data rights that I think is dumb. Knowing what the performance of falcon to a particular altitude is doesn't really help your competition. They either have a rocket that can beat that performance or they don't. Knowing where the goal posts are doesn't change that
gotta say though itâs wacky how one could afford a fully expended FH but not afford one customised to their requirements
either SpaceX charges way more for that, or falcon heavies are way cheaper than I thought
The launch for Gateway isn't cheap (pretty price gouged imo), and Gateway is cost sharing the development of the long fairing with USSF, there's a lot of dev funding already built in
or maybe itâs fixed price based on a lower expected mass that might explain it
rip
I'll also say that just because the mass limit is a factor doesn't mean that it's actually in play. PPE+HALO can be close to or at the mass limit without wanting to go above it
I would expect PPE+HALO to go for a trajectory that uses the most performance it can whatever its mass though
That's entirely different than qualifying to a higher mass
The spacecraft team will use all the performance available, but that doesn't require SpaceX to change anything about upper stage
ITAR be like that
I think Doc is awesome, but he needs to stay in his place https://fxtwitter.com/docm77/status/1768274218175561854?s=46
Has he semi-obsessively followed this program since the hoppy days? Probably not. Does he not know the term development? Obviously not
i feel like you would be the last person anyone would tellđđ
Right, right, it just also means I think we should see the full capability on display even if itâs not mass
Thatâs not ITAR
(and subsequently burning up)
someoneâll slip eventually
Ok but it lasted a long time like that, so if there was one tile missing, and it maintained correct attitude the whole time, it wouldâve absolutely made it
falcon heavy canât lift more than current falcon 9?????
thatâs not a sound conclusion
Guess weâll have to wait to find out
All we know is that it did melt when there were a couple tiles missing and no attitude control, that doesnât mean that if either of those factors were missing it would have made it for sure
it also was not in the hard part of reentry
i feel like the door breaking might have made it worse too
oh that too, I forgot about that lol
Yeah having a big hole in the side of your spaceship for plasma to recirculate inside might be slightly not great
nocom
Yeah that's correct
Nope
It can deliver the same mass to a higher energy trajectory
Hence Psyche using Falcon Heavy for its interplanetary trajectory instead of Falcon 9 alone
Europa Clipper will also use FH for an interplanetary trajectory. PPE+HALO will use FH to get to an elliptic parking orbit
@CSI_Starbase Did a quick hack job on this to stabilize the rotation!
đ 268 đ 42
i cant tell if this is a joke or actulyl real
casue that shit seemed to spin alot
?
It's sped up
it had been spinning since not too long after SECO
true
Hence why it's a partial failure
I love how it rotated to aft inherently flawed design that will require a total redesign of starship
I picked this up, looked wild
wtf that webcast music
did Elon push the elevator music to be used as a BG music? đ
Definitely not Elon
my flight 3 prediction was quite accurate tbf
Same
Listen to all the Jazz songs from SpaceX's Integrated Flight Test 3!
The songs are in the same order as the original broadcast, with some relaxing starship cruising in the background for your enjoyment :)
Also somebody tell me why these songs were next to impossible to find??? like where tf did spacex go to find half of these???đ„đ„đ„
Original B...
The fantasy roleplay aspect of the fandom is very strange to me
it's how they sustain hype and the illusion of a long-term goal
notable that the public isn't nearly as invested, even compared to other exploration platforms
Roll 2d10 for the payload delivered to LEO
For a lot of people it also seems like every bit of optimism is "fanboysm"
which one is this then
https://x.com/BellikOzan/status/1768514028090085558
Sick and tired of "Starship isn't for going to Mars" takes.
Yeah, it's possible a better architecture replaces it before it ever performs in that capacity, but
a) That's what it was designed for
b) It's actually a very good architecture for that
c) There's nothing nearly asâŠ
I'm legit struggaling to remember a time SpaceX talked about their Mars plans beyond a mere mention as a long-term goal
if it was something that's legit planned and now that Starship has a succesfull ascent, you'd think they'd at least announce more of their plans and timeline and non-transport hardware they're developing for the mission (ISRU?)
the elevator music went so hard
if he did thatâs a rare musk w
NASA is now doing annual architecture reviews and publicizing the results. At least from a PR angle, it appears they're doing far more to actually go to Mars than SpaceX is
(and if Orion gets to an operational status before it is outshown, then I doubt SpaceX gets their all-starship architecture to happen on the government's dime)
Sexo
those images are beautiful
But even with those caveats, Starship is already the most revolutionary rocket ever built. Because of a relentless focus on costs and cheap building materials, such as stainless steel, SpaceX can likely build and launch a fully expendable version of Starship for about $100 million. Most of that money is in the booster, with its 33 engines. So once Super Heavy becomes reusable, you can probably cut manufacturing costs down to about $30 million per launch.
100 mil for a rocket that big is, I think it's fair to say, fairly cheap
source? eric borgars ass
surely SpaceX doesn't need news sites trying to do their launch service advertising for them
Glad to see Eric Berger is still the most objective space reporter out there 
Our beloved war criminal
Looking back on it
I still have a hard time realising how insane Starship briefly surviving reentry with its steel side facing the plasma was
How much DV does starship have left in orbit? It wasn't carrying a payload this flight and it seemed to have little to no fuel left
Didn't they say they'd need to refuel in orbit like 12 times to be full
I thought it was 6-8
"ten-ish" for HLS, so a minimum of "ten-ish"
Did it catch re-entry
Someone needs to calculate that
Dude I swear
I genuinely canât believe thereâs ppl that donât believe in rockets man
Only firmament is in your head thatâs preventing any knowledge from getting in
Like
Please
Flight 3 liftoff as viewed from the top of the tower
Slow motion view of Starship ascending through clouds above Starbase
Did anyone get footage from the ground of the booster?
They're keeping their cards surprisingly close to their chest but there is indeed a team within SpaceX working on Mars architecture
Only reason I know that is because someone on Twitter mentioned that they were part of said team
so the source is a "trust me bro"
Any ship debris images?
I know through a connection that they exist but that development is still super early and the team is super small.
It's also pretty standard for early development teams like that to exist in engineering, especially aerospace, over a decade or two before something is expected to be implemented.
I thought as much, yeah
Doubt anyone can ask much about it without forcing a breach of a couple NDAs
Not AFAWK, no
Best thing we have is a weather satellite image of the cloud pattern created by re-entry
yes
not sure if I can share but a bit of ship washed up in Madagascar
like same day as flight
Why not sure?
because it was taken by a friend of a friend
Oh gotcha
Do we have a rough idea of seconds yet for launch?
kk
DAMN THAT HOT https://fxtwitter.com/SpaceX/status/1768807328021917716
Yes
That comment section is a mess (as usual)
moonlink
I say this with all seriousness, it must be nice to be that detached from reality. Imagine how happy you'd be if you could just believe in fairy tales
True, but I still prefer believing in facts
I donât know, in order to build this sort of worldview you need to make up a conspiracy, secret manipulators suppressing your ideas, and thatâs not a very pleasant state of mind
strong agree with this
a simpler world is a happier one, even if its stupid and incredibly unhealthy
Imagine if these were in flicker..
Their kinda compressed
Ok it's like so annoying though space has so much good photos and they have to compress it on x
mmm
Idc if it's 1 bit photos these photos look spectacular no matter how much compression and no one can change my mind on that
Didn't think about that lol that's true, using fairy tails to shadow yourself from the real harsh reality must be a dream
That's true but they have the high resolution versions is the thing
It's like
Gate keeping feeling
Like at least give spacex x account low compression permissions or something
Also Using x in a Sentence is so weird
we all do this to some degree yknow
Scotts video is #2 on trending
wow
"Damn. 18000 of these on our beaches. Starship pollution bad."
- A Twitter user that 100% exists and will actually say that unironically
I want one
if i find an intact one ill use it as a dinner plate
mmmmm microplastics in my dinner
This is such a dumbass title because yeah it made it to orbit but it failed on reentry, so they have to ground it because it didn't meet the entire mission
it succesfuly made it to orbit (perigee below ground (uncontrolled))
(Just my view of considering this launch a success)
The launch is considered only till starship's 6 enginge cutoff, after that anything performed is considered as missions done by a payload such as a sattelite but in this case the whole ship is the sattelite, for the booster, we consider landing as a separate factor in the app and moreover this is a suborbital launch which was meant to disintegrate on landing, which it anyways did just a bit above
I see it as:
Launch was successful
Landing wasnt successful
loss of Attitude control after SECO, as well as Engine relights not happening can disqualify a lot of launches as success
as far as I see it, it's not yet qualified as an expendable launcher
sooo no orbit
very simple
suborbital
one might call it

They did suborbital propellant transfer
next step: suborbital refuelling

starship
oh god oh fuck the foam hit the leading edge
Don't joke about that shit Ryan
some shit should just be off limits
sadly there are far too many dipshits who fail to comprehend this
If I had a nickel for each Columbia joke made in this thread, Iâd have two nickels.
Which isnât a lot, but it really shouldnât have happened twice
Is that guy even real? Heâs kinda in the same realm as that one SLS guy in the idiot provocateur department
I know itâs not actually foam but the resemblance is striking isnât it?
Sorry I made that comment without the appropriate gravitas
Who is this
SpongeBob
I think you're genuinely just completely clueless 
do you happen to need medical assistance?
tbf would a tps tile hitting one of the flaps even do anything?
I don't know the interior construction of the flaps so not sure, but I can guarantee the tiles were fired with an air cannon at the leading edge of the flap. That's a test no one is forgetting now...
So my guess is no it wouldn't do anything
dents plausibly
No one of note donât worry about it
I donât think denting is something that really happens with this material
Ceramics arenât know for plastic deformation
i was thinking more about what would happen after a tile gets struck
bare metal getting struck again
oh, yeah. At that point itâs probably more academic than anything
Enjoy this incredible audio and video from the launch pad and various locations of the most powerful rocket to ever fly, SpaceX's Starship on its third integrated flight test, IFT3! 4K slow motion captured on various ZCam's, BlackMagic 12K Ursa, RED Komodo X and G2 4.6K with SIGMA lenses and Meade Telescopes.
SpaceX's third launch of Starship t...
this is just
beautiful
Do you guys think during the recap videos spacex does for these launches they will show the booster explosion over the ocean
Because currently i cant find any footage of ot happening
Or they waiting for how not to land video
real
The booster apparently came down >100km outside of the target zone so it's likely there were no cameras in range
Source?
:Trust me bro
jkjk
No gimme a minute to find the tweet
No but actully, FAA staetment or?
I was gonna say why they didnt light fts then but that whole range was cleared
So more like 80km away from the target splashdown location
How was this like found?
Like just based on the clouds seen?
If ture tho thats very insane

(I think TSE actually figured this one out by lawful means)
https://fxtwitter.com/mcrs987/status/1768382282727817560
T+ 15:19 Booster splashdown location on Google Earth Pro.
Approximately 25°35'27.80"N 96°19'28.06"W
Is it insane? All it means is that boostback didn't achieve the desired maneuver.
LMFAOOOO
Insane that they didnt light FTS yeah
it wasn't out of bounds as far as FTS is concerned
atleast i think they shouldve since it went well outsideo of the keep-out zone?
Or is that not how it workds?
Oh
I have seen comments stating FTS is safed during falcon 9 boostback, I wouldn't be surprised if the same is done here
How can they even get those coordinates from a blurry map?
Before entry burn
đ€·ââïž it's probably rough
I bet you can do it more precisely by looking at cloud maps and matching it to the onboard views than going by that thing
bit outside my wheelhouse
Take a crack at it!
I'm not that much of a nerd to do it myself
Don't believe that for a moment
I wasn't gonna say anything but uhhhh 
yeah alex and "not that much of a nerd" are not things that go together
probably looking at the shore colors to get a roguth estiamtl relative to those obecjts
One of the songs they used during ship coast https://www.extrememusic.com/albums/3155?item=53226&ver=191014&sharedTrack=dHJ1ZQ==
LMFAO
hehe ok thatâs funny
Good reasoning on why we still classify this as success 
Say no more
Circled the same clouds in different views, shows that the booster splashed down at the yellow dot approximately
How far away would that be?
The quick analysis looks to be right from what I can see so that's probably even more accurate than eyeballing the position from a blurry pc screen đ
That yellow dot is at approx. 25°56'N 96°4'W, which is 109km (68mi) from the launch pad.
Which would be well within the launch hazard area
Very very different from this
Their location would be here in the cloud pattern, I don't think that matches
so TSE asked to ask if he can quote tweet his original one to correct it, and if he should credit your twitter or something else
same goes
that okay with y'all?
Average ĐĐœĐ”ŃĐłĐžŃ enjoyer posted that as a reply
I think it was sent as a reply
ah okay
Sure, seems like they already saw my reply, thx for asking anyway and sorry for the late answer
Successful expendable starship launch
Succesful expendable starship ascent*
Close enough to orbit
Successful assisted starship hop
LMFAOOOOOOO
6-9 was defineltyy just a troll number givin
So do we have any info on when they'll think about attempting to catch the booster with the arms
~6-9 years time
/j
Curious how big of a hole the booster will make
Complete obliteration of the launch pad
Literally ksp
Awesomee
This video is the second, more technical version of the reentry sequence I have put together. If you just want to admire the visuals, go watch the simple version on RGV Aerial Photography at https://youtu.be/-0oUejtpVmo
Starship Flight Three (IFT-3/OFT-3) lifted off in the morning of March 14th 2024.
Starship successfully reached orbital velo...
This is a representation of what Ship 28's re-entry would have looked like on Starship Flight 3. The first render is a multiview with all three viewpoints plus the webcast. The render includes onboard flap camera reconstruction, showing the angle of the flaps and the orientation of the vehicle in reference to the earth.
The other render is an e...
Do the flaps not have alot of control authority to correct the spin
Not in the upper atmosphere where itâs not as dense
Yep you're relying almost entirely on RCS until you're far deeper into the atmosphere
The move the flaps because they have a little control, but not much
it didnât though?
I canât watch so maybe thatâs just a clickbaity title but man
Close enough ig
Like isn't it a tiny amount of difference of burn to get to orbit or not
The glow started at 100km but the velocity on the livestream didnt begin to decrease until it was at 85km. If the entire starship doesn't slow down at all then the flaps likely won't have much effect either, not above 90km at least.
Ohh
looks like it was corrected in the description, maybe they can't edit titles on Nebula or smth?
hah, oof
I don't think orbit no orbit matters
It reached 9 what % with a voluntary shut down
There's no point in just leaving an empty starship up there when you're unsure about the restart capabilities
Starship reached orbit in the same way that if I throw a ball it orbits the earth
I think the thinf is it's not worth arguing about because it was so close it doesn't matter
Throwing a ball isn't almost in real orbit
depends how fast you throw the ball, and where you throw it from
I prefer throwing manhole covers
well there's about a 99% difference in orbital velocity between Starship and that ball
This argument has gone on for years
It reached orbital velocity did it not
True there's that, plenty of sub orbital trajectories that would be orbital at like 200km circular
i mean what if we look at characteristic energy
which is basically equivalent to looking at semimajor axis
He also noted that the inter-tank cryogenic propellant transfer test on the third Starship flight last month was successful by all accounts, although analysis of data from it is ongoing.
yay!
oh hey that's neat
SpaceX final Update:
https://www.spacex.com/updates/#flight-3-report
Clogged thrusters
Getting the feeling the filters arenât addressing the root cause of the blockage here
It just came out that the HSR may have been jettisoned on this flight too
POSSIBLY MORE EVIDENCE;
Shadow on the vapor as the vehicle passes a cloud layer appears to show the seconds immediately following the jettison. Not sure how I didn't notice it up until right now but it's certainly there. The booster lost control immediately following this.
Quoting TheSpaceEngineer (@mcrs987)
Some smart folks over in the @RG...
I tried to reproduce the view at ~6:47:10 by modeling the sun angle and shadow being cast onto the vapor. The only way to get the angled shadow on the vapor is if an object is at an angle roughly right above the camera on the booster. Here I'm showing the HSR at an angle to produce the angled shadow in the render.
The issue is that this casts ...
Well, they certainly didnât try to.
It seems like something they would've mentioned if they intended to jettison it
so it partially peeled off, for some reason
that explains the intentional jettison for flight 4, maybe to avoid the control challenges that HSR peeling events would bring
Could the ring being partially ripped off be one of the reasons the booster lost control?
And has seriously no one caught it on video during its descent?
I guess come to think of it I actually don't remember much tracking footage from NSF or anyone else after liftoff
That's what happens when you're like close to 100km off course yeah
The absolutely weapons-grade autism that went into noticing this
at any rate SX is considering dropping the footage from it soon so that would be cool
"no point in keeping it hidden"
hah! That would be nice but itâs not like we have any way of knowing whether theyâre considering it or not
Itâs TSE what do you expect
damn they said that?
the whole shit around Flight 3 HSR looks like this rn
man this is gonna be so funny if all the shit they came to is wrong
like the dozens of hours spent rendering, checking, re-checking, re-re-checking, tweeting are for nothing 
â
â nah ur just full of shit
wait, huh?
as in from a nearby ship?
probably S28 cams? I'm not actually sure but supposedly they do have footage of t
If they have footage, the only camera I know that could see it would be the one on the top dome... if they still have it

kill this user
god that was awesome, can't wait for flight 4