#Starship Orbital Test Flight
1 messages · Page 9 of 1
I just want s26 off this plane of existence as fast as possible
this
literally launched old hardware
Because data
Why not the newest booster and Starship?
wanted to get rid of them
it was the most ready one i guess, good question
Ahhhhh
plus data
to get telemetry and data as its close to what the newer versions are
Because Elon said
I guess the data's a good enough reason
It also had that pipe collapse a while back. Its been repaired multiple times
Like they now learned that the interstage isn't strong enough 
the most honest answer lol
also at the pace spacex moves you will always be running somewhat outdated hardware
true
that shit got crumbled
and they were hoping it go smoother to see jhow the TPS tiles would fare
Also unironically another thing to note is PR
Is there any imagery of the TPS?
In the end I think this is a big win for the PR side
In flight
like im sure by the time B9 is ready there will be sufficient upgrades to w/e the next gen boosters to consider B9 somewhat obselete
Tbh its properly cheaper to blow up the bad infrastructure than test if it is bad
i wonder if starship has a black box of sorts. Will we get all the onboard footage?
That's way worse then intended
At this point Starship was doing loops, and the interstage isn't designed to handle to many lateral loads
we kinda saw this with the ship 20 booster 4 situation
i believe it does
saw somewhere that scuba divers were supposed to retrieve it
I reckon the fuel sloshing towards the heat shield side during re entry might make the blown off tiles not such a big deal
idk where tho, maybe it was mentioned on NSF
Like normally it would never deal with loads like this, and the entire interstage was already weakened heavily
its gonna have cryogenic fuel sloshing towards any hot spots during reentry
Is there a link to the onboard footage from each camera on SN15
I still can't believe how it managed to flip around like that and not tear in half.
That thing is SOLID
Because it supposed to land
same man I was amazed. mach 2 is mach 2 even at 40000ft
A F9 is also meant to land
But it would have been gone after the first flip
Its happened before
take the abort test for example
The year is 2027. Starship HLS has just launched to the Moon for its uncrewed landing test. Five Raptors went out at launch and six more after Max-Q. Starship is successfully propelled to TLI via the sheer explosive force of the FTS destroying the booster. There is still no flame trench. The entire city of Brownsville is covered in three inches of pyroclastic ashfall. For every tanker at launch there is also a cement truck continuously pouring concrete into the 500 foot crater below the OLM. The words "flame diverter" were added to the DeSantis administration's national watchlist of thought crimes two years ago. Thousands are dead from flying debris. Hoppy is inexplicably still alive and wears an eyepatch as part of the underground resistance.
Wild Rover 2 war zone footage with audio. Good stuff! #SpaceX #Starbase #Starship #Superheavy
3373
537
Guys we don't need a flame diverter

Real
Also the fact that with the launch sequence they sit on the pad with engines firing for 6 seconds
They literally pointed the worlds most powerful pressure washer at the ground
Which means that you have 33 fires spewing all their thrust into the ground for 8 or so seconds
Actually those first 3 engine casualties may have been from Debris actually

Possibly all of them
Because we only got the overlay after liftoff
What is the logic of no flame trench?
I dont get it
Make raptors resilient enough to not need it???
Apparently they need another enviro assessment
Difficulty with the high water table
OH NO THE TURTLESSSSSSS
dig a couple meters and it floods
i mean after this they probably will too 
the turtles took my plastic straws. I have no empathy for them. May they all perish
Not just turtles
The launch sent particulate miles away and if people breath it
Longer regulatory process and the fact that they're in a literal marsh so digging more than a foot into the ground is going to be massively annoying
less stuff less work/maintainance, faster turnaround/launch caidance
It can cause respiratory attacks and issues
It surely require less maintenance to rebuild the launch pad after every launch
Without regulations and stuff
id say just do something like a 145 degree where it goes into the ground, then back up at an angle
maybe itll dig a big enough hole to not need one
They're apperently adding a giant metal/water deluge/flame diverter for later
And they might need to redesign the Florida pad 
8 seconds*
you mean the sprinklers they have?
did it not have water deluge???????????
Nope
bruh
it had a water sprinkler system, but prety much no gushing
some things aint broke and dont need fixing
They need the water system from Pad 39A/B
the idea of water sound suppressing is known and works
and they have plenty of water available right there...
I know moving the Booster and Starship halfway across the country is problematic in its own right
but Starship's test REALLY would've been better at the Cape..
sea dragon?
even with potential RUD's?
...touche
i mean, raining gators are propably better than grackles
Revive sea lauch
Congrats you've built a Sea Dragon
Eh
Well they wanted to do that
But didn't work out
darn environment
using old oil derricks as mobile launch platforms
do they still have them?
just like the ship whos front fell off
Yeah it turns out that converting those was WAY harder than they thought it would be, I think they resold them at a loss
They resold them ye
yeah with a pan like that, gutting it all out would just leave a scaffolded barge bascally
Buy a container ship
Well yeah
cut a hole in the middle?
ooh a tanker ship could do, change the tanks to hold the fuel/deluge?
I'm thinking that they should buy one of those Great Lake tankers
sounds like a major explosion risk
eh if its in the ocean its fine
not like we have underwater vessels
...unless..
That's the dumbest fucking idea I've ever heard
But yeah everything considering they actually launched on the 2.5d ish try
Is kinda insane
Yeah NGL I was expecting a scrub or abort
I thought it would abort after like 3 seconds
Thought for sure the hold was gonna be it for today
What was the reason they went for this godforsaken tumble stage seperation again?
hmm if a regular sub missile silos have a diameter of 2m, and a sub is 8m, then if you were to launch a starship from it (excluding flaps/grid fins), it would need to be a 40m diameter sub
Atleast held for like 20 minutes
was incredibly impressed how it didnt just shred itself from the kerbal kracken
Not just like oh here we go
yeah lol
I mean... it kinda did eventually
the structure held beautifully
nah the explosion was the safetys firing
Oh wait you mean how well it held up during the tumble
Yeah true that was surprising
yeah as it was spinning, and turning, like those people in circuses who dance/spin on them ropes
Also showing that they can scrub superheavy and properly recycle them within a window
So yeah there are plenty of "wins"
Just well stage sep would've been nice 
hmm theres no correct term for that, other than "rope acrobat"
They made money on selling them, but not before dumping a shit ton into cleaning them up
It was a stupid idea from the start
i'm pretty sure they were for Elon's weird "Earth to Earth" thing
and agreed - it was a shit idea from the start
God Earth to Earth is such a fucking meme
Kinda reminds me of all those ideas NASA had when their budgets was essentially infinite
Yeah
Like a 1980s manned Mars mission and 70s Venus flyby
Tbf the Venus flyby was less unachievable than it was absolute useless
The Venus mission was unoffical and more of a napkin concept, IIRC
Yeah
The Mars mission was legitimately considered though, I think
cant remember much about it
The Venus one was probably more achievable than the Mars one though
Which is a low bar but still
The problem is that it would have been completely and utterly pointless from a scientific standpoint and also wildly dangerous
do you guys think we'll see another ship flight this year? i personally don't think so
eh, probably
Depends on the OLM
^
My guess is sometime this winter
yeah, maybe December
maybee, would be a nice Christmas present
Depends on the extent of pad damage, any necessary upgrades to the ship design, and so on
my complete guess is november but probably will be entirely wrong
i think at this point they'll try to go for a flame diverter
oh hey wont ya look at that
sensible engineering
i'd think so
Sub orbital tank farm would need removing though, and would the EPA allow them to divert the thrust into the reserve like that?
also the amount of digging is insane
and probably some convincing
Dont want birds nesting in there or other animals wondering in
Unless they clear it out before clearing the pad
That's during fts I think
https://twitter.com/JaneidyEve/status/1649060179642548225
view from South Padre island
4/20 View of SpaceX Starship first-ever launch attempt to orbit from Isla Blanca at South Padre Island, Texas. It was AMAZING!! Congrats on lifting off the Starbase launchpad!! @elonmusk @SpaceX
via @Tesmanian_com
777
It was a real AAP thing, they fleshed out the concept super well, just didn't build much of anything
Ironically if they actually launched when it was planned the crew would've died to a solar storm
y i k e s
Called it
this but +39000m
Reminder to my international audience: the closest place to watch Starship launches is not in the US but in Mexico. You can watch the launch 4km from the pad, against 8km in the US. It's double the distance in the US.
https://t.co/e8EtkrXzfW
so did the booster engines actually shutdown
i dont think the engines shut down
it was super slow and just flipped over
yeah
was the call for stage separation early?
like would the booster have kept going?
well no because it was low on lox
no i think it was on time its just the booster never shut down and the sep never occured
in that case that's probably software
which is slightly scary
the vehicle was upside down
real
I do like that SpaceX didn't beat around the bush
wdym
like every other company would've cut to a wide shot and been like "please wait for more info"
no cuz then danger of killin the starship engines
real
everyone just was happy
spx were just like yo this looks bad
@t @CSI_Starbase @SpaceX This could be the 2nd HPU (Hydraulic Power Unit) letting go? @CSI_Starbase
Credit| @SpaceX
338
I like how the clapping just intensified after RUD lol
battery jettison 🙂
"HPU hot swap"
lol
could be
If hydraulics failed, that explains why the sep didn't happen
that looks big
Remember the good ol days where their hydraulic system was total loss lmao
NOOOOO
I'm thinking that the sep command was given which led to the booster turning around and throttling down as planned
but that doesn't explain the tumbling
Hpus just gave up 😂
The tumbling is defo due to imbalances thrust tho
nah
The tumble could easily be corrected with the fins
It was under control
The inertia was just too much to correct after sep attempt
fair


I can't even tell if this is satire lmao
It's probably not 
Holy crap he's serious
There has always been a part of me that wants to lead flat-earthers on a wild goose-chase of evidence and whistleblowers
Just ignore them
so I just earn cult status as an undercover agent in the Naval Research Laboratory 
I just hope one day space travel is cheap enough that theyll fly and see for themselves
yeah, the best option
but theyd probably claim theyve been implanted with a microchip which makes their own senses decieve hem
them

typically people who are flerfs are poorer
Was a reference to the dude who used their money to build his own rocket
New Wallpaper
There was an attempt™️ wallpaper
NASA's suns storage
@next sierra @modest heron due to a series of events I was able to watch it live
Anyone know how many engines it can lose and still make orbit?

Depends on when in the flight I guess
I wasn't able to
I think it's like 8
god damn
This flight isn’t representative since it was at 90% thrust
Was starship too slow to achieve orbit today upon stage sep?
I remember reading three months ago, not sure if it is (or was) true
Stage Sep was supposed to be much higher and faster
I couldn't sum it up with enough words tbh so I'll just use three: "that was fucked"
It was barely around mach 2 at 39km
how fast was it supposed to be going
A rocket should be hypersonic by then
39km sounds about right for stage sep
Maybe around 8,000km/h
Good footage
Typically around 70-80km for Falcons
sounds wayyy too low
And Falcon 9 sep are low
Yeah f9 is way faster and way higher
yoooo thats epic
how did u find it
Any reason they couldnt throttle up to 100%
Yeah doesn't the core stage even reach orbital velocities
It was awesome
Yes
but why would it attempt sep with running engines
that feels wrong
Hydrogen do be crazy efficient tho
Because the computer fucked itself
What even went wrong
Only reason they can get first stage to orbit
mannyyyyyy things
many many things
I think it turned before the sep command was actually seny
That fake flat earther guy who died in his rocket?
Yeah
HPUs giving up, engines failing to light and then going down
I agree with the Scott Manley take that the low speed and high AOA caused it to flip
Biggest being the hydraulic failure
There is absolutely no way spx didn't test stage separation code
also the fact that i believe 8 engines shut down before the FTS was activated
Im surprised the AFTS didn’t activate sooner
I saw it turn and I was like holy fuck hit FTS
im surprised the thing didnt break apart by itself
yeah that seemed like wayy too long of a spin
Once it detected the whole vehicle upside down it should’ve detonated
It flipped like 5 times which is not nominal
that too, i didn't think it would handle the loads
it detected the firmament and had to turn around. NASA DOESNT WANT YOU KNOWING THIS
nominal
norminal
it's probably conservative
suboptimal if u will
It spun like 4 times
Imagine if it kept going after first flip lol
Yeah at that point I don’t think there was enough thrust to counter the inertia
You don't want to be conservative with the biggest missile ever made
Yeah lol
New loading screen icon/wheel
when i first watched it watched with no volume or subtitles so i thought they were still going to try and avoid debris hitting something else
THIS
Its center of pressure is far above center of mass, instant it has a few degrees AOA it wants to fly backwards.
So it can flip 4 times and yet it still can't handle the loads at MAX-Q
it's probably set to not deviate out of a set channel and it might've just flipped and took a while to flip out of the channel
It doesnt help that the grid fins dont fold
What aspect ratio would this even fit on
If it flew at that AOA at a higher altitude it would be fine
interstage was also apparently f'ed up
Hmm i might actually do that, make it within unity
it also probably doesn't give as much of a shit the higher it gets
you can afford leniency when you're 30k up
it looked good on the live didn't it
No
on another note
There was a noticeable crumple in the engine bay cam
Booster 7 fucking flew
someone do a lil calculation on the dynamic pressure of starships separation today, and an average F9 sep
thats what i thought but apparently it wasnt
despite that tube
YE EXACTLY this thing which has survived a broken transfer tube and an explosive fart
ill bet the pressure was way higher on todays flight, making the flip impossible
Well, tumbling at that altitude in that speed doesn’t have much aero loads
It would’ve been worse if it was Mach 4-5 and tumbling
where?
booster 7 kept going through pure spite
everything looked good on the interstage and its engines
My mind kept jumping back to the first Firefly launch

There’s a gif somewhere hold on
Spacex acquires firefly areospace
losing a raptor centre was a little shit tbf
B7 was ANGRY
reduced tvc
Right yeah this is that one
did someone say that one of the engines totally blew up
hopefully b9 testing goes a bit smoother
Yeah
I want this on a shirt
it did look like there was a fire in the engine bay
At T+30 there was a noticeable explosion and smoke cloud
iron man core shirt
I noticed that when I re-watched it
oh damn yh
Like that one NSF shirt where it's the starship engine pattern but it's this
so, second flight just like N1 second launch and falls back onto the pad ? 
My mind was blown by the graphic
considering a lot of people thought this thing would have failure cascades
the graphics were really fucking cool
leaning into the idea that they weren't gonna get all the engines to go at once
I thought it would shut down the engines opposite
nah
I think that the graphic showing engines which died is genius
the engines one was goated
Also the engine which died then came back lol
funniest part it I didnt even notice it in my excitement
not over yet 
It was like one of my focuses
might only happen if there's a lot of engine failure or maybe it doesn't do it if there's lots of engines shutting down
@wapodavenport That still doesn't answer a few questions:
- Why didn't SB's G&C not self-destruct until it tumbled for ~1:20s?
- Why didn't Starship, the launch abort system, not?
- Why did SB's G&C not terminate launch after engine outs on pad?
- What caused 3-6 engines to fail?
- Pad?
So stupid
I do question how it didn't get fast enough
i want that ui on F9 streams
(presumably)
I think it needs a timeline
i do want to know what caused so many engines to fail tho
Loss of thrust in a few engines Id assume
almost always gonna be a ring of 8 with one in the centre, all white
That explosion had to have damaged quite a few
hrm
noticably red in there? https://lunus.xyz/7HuNbo.png
hot engine bells or something more sinister
yeah, clean it up a bit, shrink the engine diagram, and add timeline
prob a fire
definitely a fire
With several engines out, wouldnt they have to reduce flow rate of fuel so they dont overdo them?
We didn’t even get to the point of noticeable flame creep
B7 went through hell and back just to get blown up 😂
Yeah clearly a fire on tbe spacex stream
so
Here is an aerial view taken today of the damage to the concrete surrounding the OLM.
@elonmusk flame trench by the next Starship Launch?
Full gallery will be available at https://t.co/l5nZ12tVTO or subscribe to our twitter
172
same time next year?
good LORD
Maybe for a phone it looks good
They would have to reduce the thrust of the engines opposite to the ones that failed
why is it so clean
wouldn't TVC be able to keep up
such a nice rectangle cut out
wouldn't that also decrease fuel usage
I would not have tweeted that because you know who could delete it if he really wanted to XD
My phone is 21:9
idk maybe something moved the dust a few hours ago
intense wind
Based
no i meant why the concrete was so nicely blasted off
Nvm it looks great
Aldi
new homescreen background
Starship
get that outta here 💀
this remains as the lock screen 😁
I will mercilessly hate on the Airane 5 for no rational reason
heh that was mine as well for a while
Just jealous of one of the most successful commercial rocket ever
doesnt make me hate it less 😛
Yeah
same reason i'm not even that big a F9 fan
I like it for its effectiveness and its economic success
but as a rocket itself its kinda meh for me
love it how of the 4 debuts this year so far all 4 have failed
It's beautiful irl
yes, which factors into the TWR decrease
the best way to start the year
SLS
Wait that was last year
With that much thrust imbalance, I doubt it
And with that crumple
yeah it makes sense
sorry im a delta 2 fanboy 😎
Which
The center of gravity would not be where it should be
too many outer engines got killed
Yeah I'm surprised it was more outer ones and only 1 inner
I just have a really furry alien-like animal with big glistening eyes and button smiling mouth as my homescreen
Lock screen is android randomised of many landscape images
Also liked the DIVM, and 4m Atlas V
2 inner
how can you like DIVM 
Oh ah
Out of the three
Ooh i might be able to customise android do it randomises between different rockets
I actually think it looks good (this is also getting increasingly unrelated to Starship OTF)
You're wrong !!!
The outer ones were the most exposed to falling debris on the initial ascent
Too bad
Napkin math says 5 engines (at 100% liftoff thrust), at 90% and potential underperformance on the "working" engines 3 sounds about right
could've possibly be damaged by concrete at liftoff too
mfw the wikipedia page for starship finally says that "It is the tallest and most powerful rocket ever flown"
Perhaps they throttled the engines up when some died
raptor 109% throttle wen
The launch was doomed from the start then
Wait this means SpaceX's success streak is gone
That's right at liftoff, as they go further they can lose more
I mean, does this count any more than the hops?
Man there's too many words for this launch
Good point
well yea i guess
I mean it is the highest starship launch
was also intended to go to "orbit"
clearly this was just supposed to be a 40km hop test from the start
clearly
side task of digging the flame trench
How does the orbital pad look
its also an explicit pure R&D launch with no payload
yes true
I fucking love methalox
Well... It looks like this Elon tweet aged beautifully and terribly
Maybe there was a payload
cheese
Jesus fucking christ it looks nuked
Scott manley?
Dmitry Rogozin
Putin himself
yknow today was a good day
no lmao, they would’ve just blasted their crew infrastructure with concrete
It launched yesterday in my time
Oh it seems there’s speculation that when the HPU blew up, some gimballing capability was lost
Which makes sense
"haha sorry guys LC-39A has been sandblasted to so no F9 Dragon launches for you"
||Only his dick||
Empty
how many HPUS are in superheavy? 3?
Two
2
did they both get kaboomed or only 1
They lost both of them, aka all gimbal
both i think
lmao both of them got nuked
What are HPUs
How does that happen
One at T+29 or so and the other around a minute in
Hydraulic power unit
who knows maybe the concrete knocked em out too 
I need so many starship pics omg
like all of that stuff is gonna need to be undone 
"Its uncanny how easy it is"
This is shrimply not loading for me
Starship launch today really makes me appreciate how dead perfect SLS's first launch was.
BuT iTeRaTiVe DeSiGn
They both have their benefits/drawbacks
no
I remember people criticized Artemis I for having go-fever
I mean when you are using engines and hardware/tech with 20-30+ years of flight experience... I'm not sure you really expect different. Not saying this to diss SLS but it is a factor
doesn’t fix they’re chucking stuff into a wildlife preserve
If SN8»SN9 was anything to go by then the next launch is going to be an even more catastrophic failure
A lot of the people that had the experience left NASA before SLS flew
yeah they’re about to go through stuff on the environment side
they had to relearn almost every operation during the pre-launch campaign
With iterative it's quick and you fly often. With NASA, it takes a long time but you can be damn well sure the thing it's gonna be perfect first try.
N1 reference
I'm well aware
This is true
true but a lot of the hardware was still flight proven
And supposedly hardware on Starship was flight proven as well
you have a stage 1 powered by STS hardware, upper stage based off an existing 2nd stage powered by an engine thats been in use since the 60s
we love leaks
Raptor does not have 20+ years of flight experience lol
i wish they ignited ship anyway lmao
yeah lol
But it does have flight experience, and hardware rich experience
and the skirt, wonder if it could’ve headed on
it probably has more test stand time than RS-25
very limited
other companies also don’t test by boom so
look, both Starship and SLS are complex vehicles
TRUE
we also have to realize that we dont know how much of today could literally just be concrete go brrrrrr
starship may be a little bit more complex
Let's embrace the fact that THIS THING FLEW
no it was supposed to happen, just kept happening
SN8 reference
Also whoever suggest using steel to cover the concrete is a little dumb
Im a big fan of thrust under skirts 
YES EXACTLY
i still cant believe it
It still feels sureal
most powerful rocket in history
I went nuts
I watched with my physics class
ever made
verified user
Does anyone remember this
I watched in the bathroom skipping class
SN8 concrete damage from its SF's?
yes ofc
No, nonono
Yeah
well one tried but his chute didn’t work
good view of tanks
you thought binary star systems were cool
always thought the tanks were a bit close to the OLM
Slow mo video of liftoff from the tower
OK NO STOP THIS IS EPIC
Pretty sure everyone at SpaceX told him it'd be a mistake
i mean they probably went up 10% in thrust when they lost 10% of engines
a 40km sep is heavily off nominal, this is basically if LV0006 kept rolling
They need to replace those
/DREAM
didn’t activate til out of corridor even with failure, prob to avoid pad boom
idk about 2
it’s like a dad that’s like DO I NEED TO TURN THIS CAR AROUND MISTER
I'm joking obviously
Terran 1 moment 
I do think there's a chance we might see if launch again before the end of the year
I wouldnt be terribly surprised
I'm almost confident that we'll see another launch this winter
That's what I was thinking
"We have decided we are moving onto super heavy heavy"
It's autumn here
triple core starship
December
Wowee
Given how the whole pad + concrete debris was underestimated the FAA will not be happy
me and her have a lotttt in common
It's gonna be hard to get permission for another launch
idk
Better focus on the cape tower
REAL
iss game over
wouldnt be surprised if we saw a launch at the end of the year but wouldnt be surprised if we saw one a year from now
And the concrete snow
I doubt it, depends on the integrity of the mounts foundation
And how long it takes to repair it
FMU FAA doesn't have jurisdiction here
Yeah
honestly I say 926 in 2nd half of october
i can’t wait
This is unacceptable
Nominal
i said B9S26 in november but that is purely a guess lol
Human made volcano
Isn't S26 scrapped
dont think so
They have jurisdiction to give a launch licence for the next attempt
Well imma go
same
School
i need to sleep
oh the FAA is NOT going to be happy
The FDA too
yeah thats not a good sign at all
mfw sand rain
I will not elaborate
or the EPA
stuff like this gives environmental groups actual stuff to criticize them for
OSHA
they’ve been violating for a longgggg time 
so, now that SFT 1 has happened, whats next
Artemis II or SFT 2 
New glenn reaches orbit successfully before starship 
New Glenn might succeed on its first attempt ngl
4/20/2024 for IFT 2 
i see it happening
yknow my bet this whole time is that vulcan will win the methalox race to orbit
wonder how the whole centaur V investigation is going
I mean for a while thats been the safest bet
I need to see that thing fly soo baaad
Starship was a big question mark + depends if you count its intended path as orbit
now it could win depending on when zq 2 flies
Will def be ZQ-2 imo
SFT 2
It's not full methalox tho
Not really
Landscape was really close
yeah ik but its still classed as a methane launcher
id say the safest bets were terran 1 and zhuque
Yeah
Eh i would have put VC over terran 1
Terran none
starship was probably the least safest bet
felt like starship would be the last to reach orbit of the 4
Tbh my bet is that terran 1 will be the last 
Well now it wont for sure
yeah
ooh idk about that
quite unsafe 
Since ZQ-2 is almost ready for its second attempt, chances are high
I mean if they dont launch it again I think its last by definition 💀
Literally disqualified
defo has highest chance
Inb4 terran r is before everything
DNF
in before Themis wins race
Neutron launches tomorrow 
Is neutron keralox
methalox iirc
ZQ-2 is literally the only one still in the race
was
it’s like the americans and landing in the moon 
damn Verniers
now there's like, one, like u said
ZQ-2: Preparing for Y2 this summer
Terran 1: Retired
Starship: Nuked launch pad
Vulcan Centaur: Not in the race since Centaur V is hydrolox
Terran R: Vaporware
Neutron: Slightly less vaporware but still years off
I was genuinely expecting starship to reach orbit for some reason
hey thats not fair Vulcan does deserve a spot on the Methalox race
tbh same, idk why I just felt like being optimistic
it does
always has been
I'll die on this hill
Besides, we're still looking at probably at least six months before Cert-1
TBH i was as well lol
I still had the realistic side of me saying "nah"
like when talking about the methalox race there were always 4, starship Terran zhuque and Vulcan
Why so much? I don't think the Centaur Investigation would take that long
but I legit was hoping for at least MECO/sep and S2 ignition, but I will not complain about wha we got
is it just me or did the full stack look smaller than i was expecting
cameras were wayyyyy too zoomed out
though if this turns out to be a concrete moment I will actually be mildly upset
didn't do it justice
Beautiful Launch
yeah same, imagine the views and how cool it would be if it worked
same
could just be u, it looked massive taking off
imo
Of course
like in a way the proportions were off
booster should’ve been longer
Starship had to go summer saluting
ah yes the dust cam™️
let’s hope cosmic perspective got some stuff
can't wait for their stuff
anyway imma go now, today was an amazing day, see u people later
it was sand
someone got their laptop covered in it
Tim Dodd's stream also mentioned it
they got covered in dust, initally thinking it was rain
Because of the Mechazilla next to it and a lack of humans/cars for perspective
and the lack of live launchpad cams
remember how B7 was never going to fly because of the downcomer 
i was dead sure it was toast
that downcomer is absolutely in worse shape now though
still seemed stubby
Hmm you know what? Im glad they didnt do this test on the moon
If it could do that much damage to the pad, just imagine the crater it would make on the moon!
Q4
Minimum
Has any debris washed up yet
This might actually be an interesting race too 
Artemis II
Hermit crab capable of withstanding 600 degrees Celsius thanks to its new starship TPS shell

?
the first alpha
Copium purge
A starbrick right?
fire suppression i think
yeah
it spun like we saw today
That one’s coming from the hold down arms itself so I think it’s actually the spin-up gases for the outer 20 engines. There does exist something like what you describe but I believe it‘a lower down
Those raptor failures I bet were from concrete breaking shit
Spacex had to deal with this design flaw
Before the next attempt (if they are allowed)
theyll be allowed, government would be shooting themselves in the foot to delay
Doubt
FAA is gonna be very pissed about the environmental impact
Turtles huffing concrete dust
disagree, it’s a critical habitat and you can’t just fuck those up
oh yeah they probably didnt factor the sheer cloud of concrete lmao
thats probably a way bigger environmental hazard than the ship
do we have hoppy info?
Hoppy looks fine to me, but I've heard that concrete has given it some bruises
Oh lmao oof
We could feel the excitement from our headquarters in Austin, TX! Congrats on another big milestone today @SpaceX. #GoBigTexas

Officially ruled a failure by the Space Police
https://twitter.com/planet4589/status/1649146583991087111?t=Fmf-rxtL2DGv6l80ehvM_A&s=19
Although the Starship flight test was planned as what I call a 'marginal orbit' not fully orbital, and not really expected to get that far anyway, I'm assigning today's flight a regular 'orbital launch failure' designation, 2023-F05.
804
6 engines out, 2 more on the way out
Man
I should have totally expected it
Those engines were sitting on B7 for basically a year
seriously
Tbh I'm surprised they kept it after the explosion
it was either send it or scrap it
Seems like they would have done anything to move alone in the vehicle tech tree
Scrap it, you already have another vehicle nearing completion
At this rate they may skip 9/26 and 10/27
?
Might as well, they're not going to be able to properly test them anytime soon
for what?
ohhh the stacks
nvm
Isn't 26 the one without flaps and a heat shield?
Yep
Same with 27, except 27 has a PEZ
Interesting
28 is the next block and the next after 25 with a TPS and flaps
Then next will probably be 28 and whatever booster is next
I think they'll skip a few because the next booster will need some big design upgrades
I hope SN11 and now this finally gets them to knock it off re: flying cooked vehicles
Stronger interstage, engines that don't explode, etc
All of this is retrofit-able
In still shocked it got as far as it did with raptors activity exploding in the engine bay
Same
With no TVC and six engines out I have no clue how it even made it through Max-Q
Much less BECO with eight engines out and god knows what else
I was surprised that it made it through Max-Q too
But also... the thing wasn't going anywhere near the speed it was supposed to be thanks to six engines going out. Could that have lessened the forces at Max-Q?
Yes, they were probably at like 60% throttle at Max-Q
Gotcha
seems like they just turned off SAS and hit the boom button when it started falling lol
....well... The booster engines certainly cut off...
... after the FTS was activated 
Does the daily hopper still exist
They forgot sas the whole Time
Or well jest at the end
@AstroLepra Actually I'm the suborbital police too, but undercover.
yes
I can’t wait until some starship debris washes ashore in wherever it does and sells it on eBay
Yeah
Ok so if you get close to Starbase from the Mexican side you can be at least 3 miles away from the pad.
I'm gonna do this one day, dont care if I put myself at risk
vs. the 5 miles from South Padre Island...
I'll flying into Mexico
oh snap wrong image
You could wait a day then go to boca chica beach
I'd rather see the launch 3 miles away
or maybe go to Boca Chica the day before and then go to Mexico for the launch
Oh I thought you meant to look for parts mb
Would debris fly towards me from 3 miles away tho?
across the border
Starship doesn't have a visa so you're safe
I already am familiar with crossing the border so this would be perfectly normal for me
just on the other coast
I'm from Cali/Baja
Was trying to make a dumb joke
If it explodes yes
As in, the debris isn't legally allowed to cross the border without a visa
That was the joke
the lighthouse in question
in Bagdad Beach
Man you know here's one thing I never understood
Who the fuck goes out to every concrete building in the middle of nowhere and covers it in graffiti
Like in the city I get it
Ah gotcha
so a lot of people have been there
Yeah that makes sense
But still, just in general who the fuck is graffitiing every abandoned building in the desert
very fascinating place, how the border fence goes into the ocean and then stops
Tijuana
Who is driving 50 miles into the Mojave to write their tag on the abandoned army complexes
Like, the shit that happened to Buran
Why would you bother to do that
I am from
Nice
I live by the coast now but I was born in Imperial County
After I was born I lived in Mexico, I even went to school in America despite living in Mexico
The only thing I can ever think of when I hear about Tijuana is the bit in Futurama where Bender says "we're a stone's throw from Tijuana" then he throws a rock over the border fence and hits some guy in the head who says something like "OUCH, woe is me, what a horrible day here in Tijuana, Mexico" in a comically loud voice to no one in particular
yeah the barrier is literally in urban areas like that
It still fucks me up that they built a city on the border between California and Mexico then decided to name the two halves "Mexicali" and "Calexico"
It's called a 'portmanteu'
True
half a word with another half of a word
Mexicali and Calexico were founded more than 100 years ago by an American land colonization company
Makes sense
New Shepard
before then they were practically the same place and the border wasnt enforced much yet
Yeah that segment is basically in the middle of the Mojave isn't it
Oh right that's the Imperial Valley
Sorry we dumped like several million gallons of river water in there and fucked up everything
Yeah true
They made the desert bloom :)
But the Salton Sea itself is kind of a disaster isn't it
One of the greatest civil engineering projects in American history too
Yeah
Yes it was an accident, and now highly toxic. Tbf it dumps from Mexico so they cant really regulate it
they need to sign some kind of international agreement for that
Yeah
The Laguna Salada used to be full of water too back then but dried up
That place is so beautiful honestly
Oh yeah wasn't like, the whole Imperial Valley an even larger lake that wasn't toxic and was actually ecologically normal until like the 1300s or so
That's Lake Cahuilla
Yeah
prehistoric lake, also the reason the entire region is below sea level
it used to be connected with the Gulf of California
What is it with the American West and giant endorheic lakes that used to exist in the desert
Glaciers I guess
it's so mesmerizing driving down the highway and seeing the flat horizon in the middle of nowhere
it's flatter than you can imagine
next to a mountain range that is like more than 4000 feet tall
I get the same feeling when I stand on a big hill over the prairie here in Texas
fwiw matamoros has a reputation for americans being sunk soooooo not the best place to go
I love being able to see incredible distances over land
i am already mexican so I'll get along fine
So far the horizon sinks beneath you
because it’s famously hard to get to so it’s a prize
True
I go back and forth Tijuana all the time, which is the most dangerous city in the world. And I never get into any trouble
Mogadishu
woah that’s cool, mustve sucked when you were running late in the mornings tho
But yeah Tijuana sounds pretty dangerous
I guess I just look like them, if you dont look like you're from there they can jump you
Yeah that makes sense
i also speak the language
yeah I remember my dad would yank me out of the bed at 7am and put me in the car in my blanket. My mom would change me after crossing.
it was preschool and they had uniforms
remember it vividly
Mexico seems like a lovely place that happens to have been through hell
prehistoric lakes are so cool
fair
Lake Bonneville moment

