Chile Patagonia style map and different aspect ratio

[digital fjord]

I think this is something that almost all players will like. 1. The landscape from steep peaks to forests, the game zone can be located on the coast. For this reason, I thought that the game lacks non-standard shaped maps, more elongated, and not square, for example, as in the screenshot.
2. A bunch of possible species, including new ones: Guanaco, Puma, Vicuñas, Patagonian Mara, Patagonian Culpeo Fox, Pudu, Gray Fox, Huemul Deer, Hare, Goose, White Tufted Grebe, Spectacled Duck.
In the end, this area looks just incredible, which I think is the most important thing.

[digital fjord]

Patagonian Mara can be the first rodent in game, with Class 2, due to weight 8-16 kg

[digital fjord]

Spectacled bear is insanely beautiful. But I don't really know if it is suitable for this map.

In any case, there should not be many of them on the map, 50-100 individuals or less. and the habitat is in the most mountainous part of the map.
Class 6
Upd: 10-16 individuals

[barren wolf]

Wayyyy less than 50, 12/16 is much more accurate given their irl status.

With this I’d like to see a falling block rifle in .270. Bringing a much needed buff to the cartridge.

[digital fjord]

That's ok too

Like tigers in nepal

[tropic cedar]

The spectacled bear does not live in Chile, much less in the Patagonian region.

[barren wolf]

I wouldn’t particularly mind if the Andes were generalized into one map tbf.

[tardy swan]

What would set this apart from Parque Fernano other than the species? Could Parque be updated with additional species? I would love mara, for example.

[barren wolf]

Terrain is completely different in every way

[tardy swan]

In the photos, other than the high mountains, it looks identical, even the plants. And it seems a bit much to have a second Patagonian map when there could be, for example, an Amazon one

[barren wolf]

Why exactly can’t South America have more than 2 map?

[tardy swan]

I just said that! An Amazon map would be great. A second Patagonian map would be, well, not very new. But I would love to see Parque updated with new species, for sure.

[digital fjord]

yes, it can be styled map, not exactly region

[digital fjord]

west and east coast of South America not so similar as I know, but there`s point for discussion

[tropic cedar]

Although the terrain of Chilean Patagonia is different due to the extension of the Andes, the trees and plants are the same as those on the Argentine Patagonian side, so basically it would be a Park 2.0, only the terrain would change.
The species of native animals are also the same but due to legislation in Argentina these are not considered Game Species so they cannot be hunted within Private Hunting Reserves (Cotos de Caza) except for the Puma, Fox and in recent years the Guanaco.
As Paque Fernando is a recreation of the Parque Diana hunting reserve, only species allowed there were included.

[barren wolf]

Parque really doesn’t do Patagonia justice, at all.

Patagonia is famous for bird hunting (doves mainly but ducks too)

[tropic cedar]

It doesn't do it justice because it is only a recreation of a specific hunting reserve with a biome limited to the Humid Mountain Forest, only a part of the Dry Mountain Forest and a little of the High Andean Steppe.
Ecotonal Shrublands, Shrub Steppe, Herbaceous Steppe, Mallines and Peatlands where bird hunting is practiced were not included because they are not found in that region.

[digital fjord]

bump