I'm currently running comfig low but with a few tweaks to make the game look good (high LOD, x4 Anti-Aliasing, HQ lighting and textures, no shadows) but have tried the opposite (low LOD, keep x4 AA, low texture and lighting quality and no shadows) and get almost the same if not slightly worse FPS going to a worse looking game. Specs include a Ryzen 5 5600X, 32 GB RAM and a RX 5700XT getting about 220+ fps with the mentioned higher settings.
#Similar performance FPS across all comfig presets?
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
Screenshot tf/custom/
(the opengl addon isn't necessary to have since you're on windows)
Yes that's right good catch, didn't realize I opted for that when I downloaded it since getting new drives recently
are you just looking at an fps counter when you're saying 220+ fps?
using net_graph to track fps
You'd need to do a proper benchmark as fps in TF2 is all over the place
yeah, looking at an fps counter to compare between presets with your hardware is difficult to tell objectively which one is better
I could just be tripping, but I moved up from a Ryzen 7 3700X and 16 to 32 GB of ram and fresh installed onto a much faster SSD recently so it could just be a result of that + using mastercomfig
Wild how much variance there is even just map to map, some maps I don't fall below 200fps at all but others 220 is like an upper limit, depending on what's happening